Anderson, A., Bader, M., Bard, E. G. et al. (1991). The HCRC map task corpus. Language and Speech, 34(4), 351–366.Google Scholar

Bachman, L. F. and Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language Testing in Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Biber, D., Conrad, S., and Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus Linguistics, Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and Assessing Intercultural Communicative Competence. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Canagarajah, S. (2006). Changing communicative needs, revised assessment objectives: Testing English as an international language. Language Assessment Quarterly, 3(3), 229–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canagarajah, S. (2007). Lingua franca English, multilingual communities, and language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 91, 923–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canale, M. and Swain, M. (1981). A theoretical framework for communicative competence. In Palmer, A. S., Groot, P., and Trosper, G., eds., The Construct Validation of Tests of Communicative Competence (pp. 31–36). Washington, DC: TESOL.Google Scholar

Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching and Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Online. Accessed 19 August 2017 from www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Framework_EN.pdfGoogle Scholar

Council of Europe. (2012). Framework of Reference for Pluralistic Approaches. Online. Accessed 10 August 2018 from http://carap.ecml.atGoogle Scholar

Council of Europe. (2018). CEFR Companion Volume. Online. Accessed 7 June 2018 from https://rm.coe.int/cefr-companion-volume-with-new-descriptors-2018/1680787989Google Scholar

Deardorff, D. K. (2011). Assessing intercultural competence. New Directions for Institutional Research, 149, 65–79.Google Scholar

English Profile. (n.d.). English Profile - What the CEFR Means for English. Online. Accessed 19 August 2017 from www.englishprofile.orgGoogle Scholar

ETS (n.d.). TOEFL iBT® Test Content. Online. Accessed 19 August 2017 from http://www.ets.org/toefl/institutions/about/contentGoogle Scholar

Feuerstein, R., Feuerstein, R. S., and Falik, L. H. (2010). Beyond Smarter: Mediated Learning and the Brain’s Capacity for Change. New York: Teachers’ College Press.Google Scholar

Gee, J. and Handford, M. (2012). The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Geranpayeh, A. and Taylor, L. (2013). Examining Listening: Research and Practice in Assessing Second Language Listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hall, C. J. (2014). Moving beyond accuracy: From tests of English to tests of ‘Englishing’. ELT Journal, 68(4), 376–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harding, L. (2012). Accent, listening assessment and the potential for a shared-L1 advantage: A DIF perspective. Language Testing, 29(2), 163–180.Google Scholar

Harding, L. (2015). Adaptability and ELF communication: The next steps for communicative language testing? In Dawadi, S., Mader, J., and Urkun, Z., eds., Selected Proceedings from the IATEFL TEA SIG 2014 Conference. Granada: IATEFL.Google Scholar

Harsch, C. and Martin, G. (2012). Adapting CEF-descriptors for rating purposes: Validation by a combined rater training and scale revision approach. Assessing Writing, 17, 228–250.Google Scholar

Harsch, C. and Poehner, M. (2016). Enhancing student experience abroad: The potential of dynamic assessment to develop student interculturality. Language and Intercultural Communication, 16(3), 470–490.Google Scholar

Harsch, C., Pant, H. A., and Köller, O., eds. (2010). Calibrating Standards-Based Assessment Tasks for English as a First Foreign Language. Standard-setting Procedures in Germany. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar

Harsch, C., Ushioda, E., and Ladroue, C. (2017). Investigating the Predictive Validity of TOEFL iBT® Scores and Their Use in Informing Policy in a UK University Setting. ETS Research Monograph. Princeton: ETS.Google Scholar

IELTS. (2015). Ensuring quality and fairness in international language testing. Online. Accessed 21 August 2017 from www.ielts.org/-/media/publications/quality-and-fairness/quality-and-fairness-2015-uk.ashx?la=enGoogle Scholar

IELTS. (2017). Speaking band decriptors. Online. Accessed 22 August 2017 from www.takeielts.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/IELTS_Speaking_band_descriptors.pdfGoogle Scholar

Jenkins, J., Cogo, A., and Dewey, M. (2011). Review of developments in research into English as a lingua franca. Language Teaching, 44(3), 281–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kim, H. and Elder, C. (2009). Understanding aviation English as a lingua franca. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 32(3), 23.1–23.17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lantolf, J. and Poehner, M. (2004). Dynamic Assessment: Bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1 , 49–74.Google Scholar

Little, D. and Erickson, G. (2015). Learner identity, leaner agency and the assessment of language proficiency. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 120–139.Google Scholar

McNamara, T. (2012). Language Assessments as Shibboleths: A Poststructuralist Perspective. Applied Linguistics, 33(5), 564–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pearson. (2017). PTE General. Specification. Online. Accessed 22 August 2017 from www.pearsonpte.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/PTE-General-Specification-2017.pdfGoogle Scholar

Pennycook, A. (2017). Translanguaging and semiotic assemblages. International Journal of Multilingualism, 14(3), 269–282.Google Scholar

Rupp, A. A., Vock, M., Harsch, C., and Köller, O. (2008). Developing Standards-based Assessment Tasks for English as a First Foreign Language – Context, Processes and Outcomes in Germany. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar

Said, H. (2011). Phraseology: Pilots and Air Traffic Controllers Phraseology Study. Montreal: International Air Transport Association.Google Scholar

Trinity College London. (2016). Exam Information: Graded Examinations in Spoken English (GESE). Online. Accessed 22 August 2017 from www.trinitycollege.com/resource/?id=5755Google Scholar

Trinity College London. (n.d.). Online. Accessed 22 August 2017 from www.trinitycollege.com/site/?id=3108Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and Language. In Hanfmann, E. and Vakar, G., eds. and trans. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Wicaksono, R. (2012). Raising students’ awareness of the construction of communicative (in)competence in international classrooms. In Ryan, J., ed., Cross Cultural Teaching and Learning for Home and International Students: Internationalisation of Pedagogy and Curriculum in Higher Education. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

ALC. (2006). Standard speaking tests. Available online from www.alc.co.jp/edusys/sst/english.htmlGoogle Scholar

Atkinson, J. M. and Heritage, J. (1984). Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bonk, W. J. and Ockey, G. J. (2003). A many-facet Rasch analysis of the second language group oral discussion task. Language Testing, 20(1), 89–110.Google Scholar

Brown, A. (2006). Candidate discourse in the revised IELTS Speaking Test. IELTS Research Report, 6, 71–89.Google Scholar

Cambridge English. (2008). Cambridge Preliminary English Test: Official Examination Papers from University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations (PET Practice Tests). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cambridge English. (2009). Cambridge First Certificate in English: Official Examination Papers from University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations (FCE Practice Tests). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cambridge English. (2018a). Cambridge English First (FCE). Available online from www.cambridgeenglish.org/exams-and-tests/first/Google Scholar

Cambridge English. (2018b). Grade statistics. Available online from http://gradestatistics.cambridgeenglish.org/2016/fce.htmlGoogle Scholar

Canagarajah, S. (2006). Changing communicative needs, revised assessment objectives: Testing English as an international language. Language Assessment Quarterly, 3(3), 229–242.Google Scholar

Cohen, J. (1998). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. Hillsdale, MI: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Eiken Foundation of Japan. (2014) TEAP Speaking rating scales. Available online from www.eiken.or.jp/teap/construct/sp_rating_crit.htmlGoogle Scholar

Field, J. (2005). Intelligibility and the listener: The role of lexical stress. TESOL Quarterly, 39, 399–423.Google Scholar

Field, J. (2018). Rethinking the Second Language Listening Test: From Theory to Practice. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar

Galaczi, E. D. and Taylor, L. (2018). Interactional competence: Conceptualisations, operationalisations, and outstanding questions. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(3), 219–236.Google Scholar

Gass, S. M. and Mackey, A (2000). Stimulated Recall Methodology in Second Language Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Geranpayeh, A. and Taylor, L., eds. (2013). Examining Listening: Research and Practice in Assessing Second Language Listening. Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Issacs, T. (2008). Towards defining a valid assessment criterion of pronunciation proficiency in non-native English speaking graduate students. Canadian Modern Language Review, 64, 555–580.Google Scholar

Iwashita, N., Brown, A., McNamara, T., and O’Hagan, S. (2008). Assessed levels of second language speaking proficiency: How distinct? Applied Linguistics, 29(1), 24–29.Google Scholar

Jaiyote, S. (2016). The relationship between test-takers’ first language, listening proficiency and their performance on paired speaking tests. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Bedfordshire.Google Scholar

Jenkins, J. (1997). Testing pronunciation in communicative exams. In M. Vaughan-Rees, ed., A Special Issue of Speak Out! Bringing Together the Interests of the IATEFL Pronunciation and Testing Sigs, pp. 7–11.Google Scholar

Jenkins, J. (2000). The Phonology of English as an International Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Khalifa, H. and Weir, C. J. (2009). Examining Reading: Research and Practice in Assessing Second Language Reading. Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

May, L. (2011). Interaction in a Paired Speaking Test. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In Linn, R. L., ed., Educational Measurement, 3rd ed. London and New York: McMillan.Google Scholar

Messick, S. (1996). Validity and washback in language testing. Language Testing, 13, 241–256.Google Scholar

MEXT. (2008). The course of study for upper secondary school. Available online from www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/shotou/new-cs/index.htmGoogle Scholar

Nakatsuhara, F. (2012). The relationship between test-takers’ listening proficiency and their performance on the IELTS Speaking Test. In Taylor, L. and Weir, C. J., eds., IELTS Collected Papers 2: Research in Reading and Listening Assessment (pp. 519–573). Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nakatsuhara, F. (2014). A research report on the development of the Test of English for Academic Purposes (TEAP) Speaking Test for Japanese university entrants – Study 1 and Study 2. Available online from www.eiken.or.jp/teap/group/pdf/teap_speaking_report1.pdfGoogle Scholar

Nakatsuhara, F. and Jaiyote, S. (2015). Exploring the impact of test-takers’ L1 backgrounds on paired speaking test performance: How do they perform in shared and non-shared L1 pairs? Paper presented at the BAAL/CUP Applied Linguistics Seminar. York St John University, 24–26 June 2015.Google Scholar

National Centre for University Entrance Examinations. (2017). Transition in the number of applicants. Available online from www.dnc.ac.jp/data/suii/suii.htmlGoogle Scholar

O’Sullivan, B. (2011). Introduction – Professionalisation, localisation and fragmentation in language testing. In O’Sullivan, B., ed., Language Testing: Theory and Practice (pp. 1–12). Oxford: Palgrave.Google Scholar

O’Sullivan, B. and Dunlea, J. (2015). Aptis Genearal Techinical Manual Ver 1.0 TR/2015/005. Available online from www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/aptis_general_technical_manual_v-1.0.pdfGoogle Scholar

O’Sullivan, B. and Weir, C. J. (2011). Test development and validation. In O’Sullivan, B., ed., Language Testing: Theories and Practices (pp. 13–32). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Post, B. (2011). Using acoustic analysis software to analyse L2 pronunciation features. Paper presented at the 3rd BAALTEASIG Conference. University of Warwick.Google Scholar

Seedhouse, P. and Egbert, M. (2006). The interactional organisation of the IELTS Speaking Test. IELTS Research Report, 6, 161–205.Google Scholar

Sewell, A. (2013). Language testing and international intelligibility: A Hong Kong case study. Language Assessment Quarterly, 10(4), 423–443.Google Scholar

Shaw, S. D. and Weir, C. J. (2007). Examining Writing: Research and Practice in Assessing Second Language Writing. Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tanaka, C. (2018, June 13). Private-sector test results to account for 20% of national university English entrance exam scores. The Japan Times. Available online from www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2018/06/13/national/private-sector-test-results-account-20-national-university-english-entrance-exam-scores/#.W5aI8uhKhAkGoogle Scholar

Taylor, L. (2006). The changing landscape of English: Implications for English language assessment. ELT Journal, 60(1), 51–60.Google Scholar

Taylor, L., ed. (2011). Examining Speaking: Research and Practice in Assessing Second Language Speaking. Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tsuzuki, M. and Nakamura, S. (2009). Intelligibility assessment of Japanese accents. In Hoffmann, T. and Siebers, L., eds., World Englishes: Problems, Properties and Prospects (pp. 239–261). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Weir, C. J. (2005). Language Testing and Validation: An Evidence-Based Approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Young, R. (2011). Interactional Competence in Language Learning, Teaching, and Testing. In Hinkel, E., ed., Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning Volume II (pp. 426–443). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). In Holquist, M., ed. Emerson, C. and Holquist, M., trans. The Dialogic Imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Boyle, B. (2017). Response to Ward (2017, 19 May). Exclusive: More Sats ‘chaos’ as two thirds of moderators fail to assess pupils’ work correctly. Times Educational Supplement. Online. Accessed August 2017 from www.tes.com/news/school-news/breaking-news/exclusive-more-sats-chaos-two-thirds-moderators-fail-assess-pupilsGoogle Scholar

Busby, E. (2018, 18 May). ‘Worrying decline’ in pupils choosing English at A level. The Independent. Available from https://edition.independent.co.uk/editions/uk.co.independent.issue.250518/data/8368091/index.htmlGoogle Scholar

Carter, R., ed. (1991). Knowledge about Language and the Curriculum: The LINC Reader. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar

Davies, C. (2017). Sats tests for seven-year-olds in England set to be scrapped. The Guardian. Online. Accessed August 2017 from www.theguardian.com/education/2017/mar/30/national-sats-tests-for-seven-year-olds-set-to-be-scrappedGoogle Scholar

Department for Education and Skills. (2006). Primary National Strategy: Primary Framework for Literacy and Mathematics. Norwich: OPSI.Google Scholar

Department for Education. (2015). Policy Paper: 2010 to 2015 government policy: school and college qualifications and curriculum. Online. Accessed 1 August 2017 from www.gov.uk/government/publications/2010-to-2015-government-policy-school-and-college-qualifications-and-curriculum/2010-to-2015-government-policy-school-and-college-qualifications-and-curriculumGoogle Scholar

Dombey, H. (2008). The simple view of reading – Explained. Online. Accessed August 2017. www.teachingtimes.com/news/the-simple.htmGoogle Scholar

Eaglestone, R. and Kovesi, S. (2013, 31 October). English: Why the discipline may not be ‘too big to fail”. Times Higher Education.Google Scholar

Gillen, J. (2014). Digital Literacies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Goddard, A. and Beard, A. (2007). As Simple as ABC? Issues of transition for students of English Language A Level going on to study English language/linguistics in higher education. Report Series 14. The Higher Education Academy English Subject Centre.Google Scholar

Goddard, A. and Carey, N. (2017). Discourse: The Basics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the New Media Age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lightfoot, M. and Martin, N. (1988). The Word for Teaching Is Learning: Essays for James Britton. NATE. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Mansell, W. (2017). Battle on the adverbials front: Grammar advisers raise worries about Sats tests and teaching. The Guardian. Online. Accessed August 2017 from www.theguardian.com/education/2017/may/09/fronted-adverbials-sats-grammar-test-primaryGoogle Scholar

Ofsted, . (2013). Improving literacy: Moving English forward. Ofsted Schools Survey Reports. Online. Accessed September 2017 from www.gov.uk/government/publications/moving-english-forwardGoogle Scholar

Parliament Education Select Committee Report on Primary Assessment. Online. Accessed August 2017 from https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmeduc/682/68202.htmGoogle Scholar

Perera, K. (1984). Children’s Writing and Reading: Analysing Classroom Language. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Richmond, J. (2015). Reading 3 to 7. English Language and Literacy 3 to 19: Principles and Proposals. Leicester: UKLA and Owen Education.Google Scholar

Rosen, M. (2016). How to engage an audience? Good conjunctions and suffixes. [Irony alert]. Online. Accessed August 2017 from http://michaelrosenblog.blogspot.co.uk/2016/05/how-to-engage-audience-good.htmlGoogle Scholar

Rosenkvist,  M. (2010). Using student test results for accountability and improvement: A literature review. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 54. Paris: OECD Publishing. Online. Accessed August 2017 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5km4htwzbv30-enGoogle Scholar

Rumelhart, D. (1976). Toward an interactive model of reading. Technical Report No. 56. San Diego, CA: Center for Human Information Processing, University of California at San Diego.Google Scholar

Russell Group. (2016). Subject choices at school and college. Online. Accessed August 2017 from http://russellgroup.ac.uk/for-students/school-and-college-in-the-uk/subject-choices-at-school-and-college/Google Scholar

Ward, H. (2017). More Sats ‘chaos’ as two thirds of moderators fail to assess pupils’ work correctly. Times Educational Supplement online. Online. Accessed August 2017 from www.tes.com/news/school-news/breaking-news/exclusive-more-sats-chaos-two-thirds-moderators-fail-assess-pupilsGoogle Scholar

Weale, S. (2017). More primary school children suffering stress from Sats, survey finds. The Guardian. Online. Accessed August 2017 from www.theguardian.com/education/2017/may/01/sats-primary-school-children-suffering-stress-exam-timeGoogle Scholar

Wiggins, K. (2016). Top adviser calls for a rethink over ‘really demanding’ grammar test for 11-year-olds. Times Educational Supplement. Online. Accessed August 2017 from www.tes.com/news/school-news/breaking-news/exclusive-top-adviser-calls-rethink-over-really-demanding-grammarGoogle Scholar

Wyse, D. (2017). Evidence given to the Parliamentary Education Select Committee: Primary Assessment, 3: Design and Development, Writing, para 34. Online. Accessed 31 July 2019 from https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmeduc/682/682.pdfGoogle Scholar