Book contents
- Global Health
- Global Health
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Section 1 Global Health: Definitions and Descriptions
- Section 2 Global Health Ethics, Responsibilities, and Justice: Some Central Issues
- Section 3 Analyzing Some Reasons for Poor Health and Responsibilities to Address Them
- Section 4 Environmental/Ecological Considerations and Planetary Health
- Chapter 20 The Environment, Ethics, and Health
- Chapter 21 Ecological Ethics, Planetary Sustainability, and Global Health
- Chapter 22 Mass Migration and Health in the Anthropocene Epoch
- Chapter 23 Animals, the Environment, and Global Health
- Chapter 24 Justice and Global Health: Planetary Considerations
- Section 5 The Importance of Including Cross-Cultural Perspectives and the Need for Dialogue
- Section 6 Shaping the Future
- Index
- References
Chapter 24 - Justice and Global Health: Planetary Considerations
from Section 4 - Environmental/Ecological Considerations and Planetary Health
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 February 2021
Book contents
- Global Health
- Global Health
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Section 1 Global Health: Definitions and Descriptions
- Section 2 Global Health Ethics, Responsibilities, and Justice: Some Central Issues
- Section 3 Analyzing Some Reasons for Poor Health and Responsibilities to Address Them
- Section 4 Environmental/Ecological Considerations and Planetary Health
- Chapter 20 The Environment, Ethics, and Health
- Chapter 21 Ecological Ethics, Planetary Sustainability, and Global Health
- Chapter 22 Mass Migration and Health in the Anthropocene Epoch
- Chapter 23 Animals, the Environment, and Global Health
- Chapter 24 Justice and Global Health: Planetary Considerations
- Section 5 The Importance of Including Cross-Cultural Perspectives and the Need for Dialogue
- Section 6 Shaping the Future
- Index
- References
Summary
When I started to work in Pittsburgh, a journalist called with a request for an explanation about infant mortality. Recent surveys had shown that infant mortality in some neighborhoods of Pittsburgh was higher than in developing countries such as Nicaragua and the Philippines. These findings caused an uproar on social media. How was this possible? In 42 countries, infant mortality rates are lower than in the United States. For every 1,000 American babies born, an average of 5.82 will die before their first birthday. In Pennsylvania, the average infant mortality rate is 5.9. In Pittsburgh, the average is 6.65, but in some areas it is up to 22, especially among African-American populations. Americans, unaccustomed to not being in a leadership role, cannot imagine why such disparities occur (Smith, 2017).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Global HealthEthical Challenges, pp. 316 - 325Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Smith, A. (2017). Infant mortality in Pittsburgh and beyond. National Health Corps. Available at www.nationalhealthcorps.org/pittsburgh/blog/infant-mortality-pittsburgh-and-beyond.Google Scholar
Adams, S., Blokker, P., Doyle, N., et al. (2015). Social imaginaries in debate. Social Imaginaries 1, 15–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alkon, A., & Agyeman, J. (eds.) (2011). Cultivating Food Justice: Race, Class, and Sustainability. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ashby, M., & Morrell, B. (2018). To the barricades or the blackboard: bioethics activism and the “stance of neutrality.” Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15, 479.Google Scholar
Beall, R., Blanchet, R., & Attaran, A. (2017). In which developing countries are patents on essential medicines being filed? Globalization and Health 13, 38.Google Scholar
Benatar, S., Daar, A., & Singer, P. (2003). Global health ethics: the rationale for mutual caring. International Affairs 79(1), 107–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benatar, , Daar, A., & Singer, P. (2005). Global health challenges: the need for an expanded discourse on bioethics. PLoS Medicine 2(7)), e143. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benatar, S. (2005). Moral imagination: the missing component in global health. PLoS Medicine 2(12), e400. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020400.Google Scholar
Bastian, B., Denson, T., & Haslam, N. (2013). The roles of dehumanization and moral outrage in retributive justice. PLoS One 8(4), e61841. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061842.Google Scholar
Chambliss, J. (1991). John Dewey’s idea of imagination in philosophy and education. Journal of Aesthetic Education 25, 43–49.Google Scholar
Chen, N., & Sharp, L. (eds.) (2014). Bioinsecurity and Vulnerability. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Crockett, M. (2017). Moral outrage in the digital age. Nature Human Behavior 1, 769–771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, S., Kamradt-Scott, A., & Rushton, S. (2015). Disease Diplomacy: International Norms and Global Health Security. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, A., Jordens, C., Macneill, P., & Zion, D. (2018). Bioethics and the myth of neutrality. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15, 483–486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duhigg, C. (2019). Why are we so angry? The untold story of how all got so mad at one another. The Atlantic, January–February, 63-75.Google Scholar
English, A. (2016). John Dewey and the role of the teacher in a globalized world: imagination, empathy, and ‘third voice. Educational Philosophy and Theory 48, 1046–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, P., & Campos, N. (2004). Rethinking medical ethics: a view from below. Developing World Bioethics 4, 17–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garrafa, V., Solbakk, J., Vidal, S., & Lorenzo, C. (2010). Between the needy and the greedy: the quest for a just and fair ethics of clinical research. Journal of Medical Ethics 36, 500–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Honneth, A. (2007). Disrespect: The Normative Foundations of Critical Theory. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Jennings, B., & Dawson, A. (2015). Solidarity in the moral imagination of bioethics. Hastings Center Report 45, 31–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacIntyre, A. (2007). Edith Stein: A Philosophical Prologue, 1931–1922. Lanham, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Moreno, J. (2005). In the wake of Katrina, has “bioethics” failed? American Journal of Bioethics 5, W18–W19.Google Scholar
Peppard, C. (2014). Just Water: Theology, Ethics, and the Global Water Crisis. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.Google Scholar
Pogge, T. (2013). World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Resnik, D. (2012). Environmental Health Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlosberg, D. (2007). Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements, and Nature. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 45ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherwin, S. (2011). Looking backwards, looking forward: hope for bioethics’ next twenty-five years. Bioethics 25, 75–82.Google Scholar
Solomon, M., & Jennings, B. (2017). Bioethics and populism: how should our field respond? Hastings Center Report 47, 11–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sparke, M., & Anguelov, D. (2012). H1N1, globalization and the epidemiology of inequality. Health & Place 18, 726–736.Google Scholar
Stuurman, S. (2017). The Invention of Humanity: Equality and Cultural Difference in World History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ten Have., H. (2016a) Vulnerability: Challenging Bioethics. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ten Have, H. (2019). Wounded Planet: How Declining Biodiversity Endangers Health and How Bioethics Can Help. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmons Roberts, J. (2007). Globalizing environmental justice, in Sandler, R., & Pezzulo, P. (eds.), Environmental Justice and Environmentalism: The Social Justice Challenge to the Environmental Movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 285–307.Google Scholar
Williams, T. (2005). Beyond distributive justice. Logos: A Journal of Catholic Thought and Culture 8, 90–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, T. (2003). Phenomenology and the moral imagination. Logos: A Journal of Catholic Thought and Culture 6, 104–121.Google Scholar