Book contents
- The Civil Sphere in East Asia
- The Civil Sphere in East Asia
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Contributors
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 South Korea’s Presidential Scandal and Civil Repair
- 2 System Crisis and the Civil Sphere
- 3 Boundary Tension and Reconstruction
- 4 Performing Civil Disobedience in Hong Kong
- 5 Fault Line in the Civil Sphere
- 6 Three Moral Codes and Microcivil Spheres in China
- 7 Attempting Civil Repair in China
- 8 Fantasy Is More Believable
- 9 Institutions and Civil Instantiation
- 10 What Constitutes “Autonomy” in the Japanese Civil Sphere?
- 11 Developing Communicative Institutions in Local Communities
- 12 Reconciliation through the Transnational Civil Sphere?
- Commentary
- Conclusion
- Index
- References
10 - What Constitutes “Autonomy” in the Japanese Civil Sphere?
The Struggle over Surrogacy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 February 2019
Book contents
- The Civil Sphere in East Asia
- The Civil Sphere in East Asia
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Contributors
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 South Korea’s Presidential Scandal and Civil Repair
- 2 System Crisis and the Civil Sphere
- 3 Boundary Tension and Reconstruction
- 4 Performing Civil Disobedience in Hong Kong
- 5 Fault Line in the Civil Sphere
- 6 Three Moral Codes and Microcivil Spheres in China
- 7 Attempting Civil Repair in China
- 8 Fantasy Is More Believable
- 9 Institutions and Civil Instantiation
- 10 What Constitutes “Autonomy” in the Japanese Civil Sphere?
- 11 Developing Communicative Institutions in Local Communities
- 12 Reconciliation through the Transnational Civil Sphere?
- Commentary
- Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Civil Sphere in East Asia , pp. 213 - 233Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Edwards, Arthur. 1999. “Scientific Expertise and Policy-Making: The Intermediary Role of the Public Sphere.” Science and Public Policy 26(3):163–70.Google Scholar
Ehara, Yumiko (江原由美子), ed. 1992. Feminizumu no syutyou (フェミニズムの主張). Tokyo: Keisosyobo.Google Scholar
Hirayama, Shiro, and Katsuhiko, Takahashi (平山史郎・高橋克彦). 2002. “Koudoseisyokuiryou no genba kara mita ’jikokettei’ no jissai to kongo no kadai (高度生殖医療の現場から見た「自己決定」の実際と今後の課題).” Sanfujinkanosekai (産婦人科の世界) 54(5):51–58.Google Scholar
Hoshino, Kazumasa (星野一正). 2002. “Seisyokuiryou wo ukeru kanjya no jinkakuken to shite no jikoketteiken (生殖医療を受ける患者の人格権としての自己決定権).” Sanfujinkanosekai (産婦人科の世界) 54(5):5–11.Google Scholar
Jennings, Bruce. 2007. “Autonomy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics, ed. Steinbock, Bonnie. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 72–89.Google Scholar
Kane, Elizabeth. 1988. Birth Mother: The Story of America’s First Legal Surrogate Mother. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Komatsu, Yoshihiko. 2007. “The Age of Revolutionized Human Body and the Right to Die.” In Dark Medicine: Rationalizing Unethical Medical Research, ed. LaFleur, William R, Bohme, Gernot, and Shimazono, Susumu. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 180–200.Google Scholar
Kotani, Satoshi (小谷敏). 1998. Wakamonotachi no henbou: sedai wo meguru syakaigakutekimonogatari (若者たちの変貌―世代をめぐる社会学的物語), Kyoto: Sekaishisousya.Google Scholar
Leflar, Robert B. 2002. Nihon no Iryō to Hō: Infōmudo Konsento Runessansu (日本の医療と法―インフォームドコンセント・ルネッサンス), trans. Michiyuki Nagasawa. Tokyo: Keiso Shobo.Google Scholar
Lock, Margalet. 2001. Twice Dead: Organ Transplants and the Reinvention of Death. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markens, Suzan. 2007. Surrogate Motherhood and the Politics of Reproduction. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Miyadai, Sinji (宮台真司). 1998. “Jikoketteigenron: jiyuu to songen (自己決定原論―自由と尊厳).” In Sei no jikokettei genron: enjyokousai/baibaisyun/kodomo no sei (「性の自己決定」原論―援助交際・売買春・子どもの性). Tokyo: Kinokuniyashoten, pp. 252–72.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, Shigemi (中川成美). 2002. “‘Enjokousai’ wa baibaisyun dewa nai?: Seisa na ki aidenthithi wo motome te (<援助交際＞は売買春ではない？―性差無きアイデンティティーを求めて).” Baibaisyun to nihonbungaku (売買春と日本文学), ed. Okano, Yukie, Hasegawa, Kei, and Watanabe, Sumiko. Tokyo: Tokyodou Syuppan.Google Scholar
Potts, Michael, Byrne, Paul A, and Nilges, Richard G. 2000. Beyond Brain Death: The Case Against Brain Based Criteria for Human Death. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Tateiwa, Shinya (立岩真也). 1998. “Kuukyona-katai-yurui jikokettei (空虚な～堅い～緩い自己決定).” Gendaishisou (revue de la pensée d’aujourd’hui) (現代思想) 26(8):57–75.Google Scholar
Tsuge, Azumi. 2000. “Reproductive Health and Reproductive Rights as Women’s Human Rights.” Journal of the National Women’s Education Center of Japan 4:9–14.Google Scholar
Tsukahara, Kumi (塚原久美). 2014. Chuzetsugijyutsu to repurodakutibu･raitsu: feminisutorinri no shiten kara (中絶技術とリプロダクティヴ・ライツ: フェミニスト倫理の視点から). Tokyo: Keiso Syobo.Google Scholar
Ueno, Chizuko (上野千鶴子). and Shinji, Miyadai (宮台真司). 1999. Baibaisyunkaitaishinsyo: kindai no seikihan kara ikani nukedasu ka (買売春解体新書―近代の性規範からいかに抜け出すか). Tokyo: Tsugesyoboushinsya.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by