Book contents
- The Ape that Understood the Universe
- Praise for The Ape that Understood the Universe
- The Ape that Understood the Universe
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- 1 The Alien’s Challenge
- 2 Darwin Comes to Mind
- 3 The SeXX/XY Animal
- 4 The Dating, Mating, Baby-Making Animal
- 5 The Altruistic Animal
- 6 The Cultural Animal
- Book part
- Permissions
- Notes
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 September 2019
Foreword by
Book contents
- The Ape that Understood the Universe
- Praise for The Ape that Understood the Universe
- The Ape that Understood the Universe
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- 1 The Alien’s Challenge
- 2 Darwin Comes to Mind
- 3 The SeXX/XY Animal
- 4 The Dating, Mating, Baby-Making Animal
- 5 The Altruistic Animal
- 6 The Cultural Animal
- Book part
- Permissions
- Notes
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Ape that Understood the UniverseHow the Mind and Culture Evolve, pp. 325 - 354Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Abbot, P., Abe, J., Alcock, J., et al. (2011). Inclusive fitness theory and eusociality. Nature, 471, E1–E4.Google Scholar
Alexander, R. D. (1974). The evolution of social behavior. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 5, 325–383.Google Scholar
Alexander, R. D. (1987). The biology of moral systems. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Alexander, R. D., Hoogland, J. L., Howard, R. D., Noonan, K. M., & Sherman, P. W. (1979). Sexual dimorphisms and breeding systems in pinnipeds, ungulates, primates, and humans. In Chagnon, N. A. & Irons, W. (Eds.), Evolutionary biology and human social behavior: An anthropological perspective (pp. 402–435). North Scituate, MA: Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
Allison, R., & Risman, B. J. (2013). A double standard for “hooking up”: How far have we come toward gender equality? Social Science Research, 42, 1191–1206.Google Scholar
Anderson, K. G. (2006). How well does paternity confidence match actual paternity? Evidence from worldwide nonpaternity rates. Current Anthropology, 47, 513–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, K. G., Kaplan, H., Lam, D., & Lancaster, J. B. (1999). Paternal care by genetic fathers and stepfathers II: Reports from Xhosa high school students. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 433–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, K. G., Kaplan, H., & Lancaster, J. B. (1999). Paternal care by genetic fathers and stepfathers I: Reports from Albuquerque men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 405–431.Google Scholar
Anthony, C. D. (2003). Kinship influences cannibalism in the wolf spider, Pardosa milvina. Journal of Insect Behavior, 16, 23–36.Google Scholar
Apicella, C. L. (2014). Upper-body strength predicts hunting reputation and reproductive success in Hadza hunter-gatherers. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 508–518.Google Scholar
Apicella, C. L., Feinberg, D. R., & Marlowe, F. W. (2007). Voice pitch predicts reproductive success in male hunter-gatherers. Evolution and Human Behavior, 3, 682–684.Google Scholar
Apicella, C. L., & Marlowe, F. W. (2004). Perceived mate fidelity and paternal resemblance predict men’s investment in children. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 371–378.Google Scholar
Archer, J. (1998). Why do people love their pets? Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 237–260.Google Scholar
Archer, J. (2002). Sex differences in physically aggressive acts between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 313–351.Google Scholar
Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8, 291–322.Google Scholar
Archer, J. (2006). Testosterone and human aggression: An evaluation of the challenge hypothesis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 319–345.Google Scholar
Archer, J. (2009). Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 249–266.Google Scholar
Archie, E. A., Hollister-Smith, J. A., Poole, J. H., et al. (2007). Behavioural inbreeding avoidance in wild African elephants. Molecular Ecology, 16, 4138–4148.Google Scholar
Arnocky, S., Piché, T., Albert, G., Ouellette, D., & Barclay, P. (2016). Altruism predicts mating success in humans. British Journal of Psychology, 108, 416–435.Google Scholar
Arthur, W. B. (2009). The nature of technology: What it is and how it evolves. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure on the modification and distortion of judgments. In Guetzkow, H. (Ed.), Groups, leadership and men (pp. 177–190). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Press.Google Scholar
Atran, S. (2002). In Gods we trust: The evolutionary landscape of religion. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Axelsson, E., Ratnakumar, A., Arendt, M.-L., et al. (2013). The genomic signature of dog domestication reveals adaptation to a starch-rich diet. Nature, 495, 360–364.Google Scholar
Badinter, E. (2010/2011). The conflict: How modern motherhood undermines the status of women (A. Hunter, Trans.). New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Baker, R. R., & Bellis, M. A. (1993). Human sperm competition: Ejaculate adjustment by males and the function of masturbation. Animal Behaviour, 46, 861–885.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Banerjee, K., & Bloom, P. (2013). Would Tarzan believe in God? Conditions for the emergence of religious belief. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 7–8.Google Scholar
Barash, D. P. (2007). Natural selections: Selfish altruists, honest liars, and other realities of evolution. New York: Bellevue Literary Press.Google Scholar
Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (Eds.). (1992). The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barrett, L., Dunbar, R. I. M., & Lycett, J. (2002). Human evolutionary psychology. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Catanese, K. R., & Vohs, K. D. (2002). Is there a gender difference in strength of sex drive? Theoretical views, conceptual distinctions, and a review of relevant evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 242–273.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2004). Sexual economics: Sex as female resource for social exchange in heterosexual interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 339–363.Google Scholar
Bekoff, M., & Byers, J. A. (Eds.). (1998). Animal play: Evolutionary, comparative and ecological perspectives. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, A. P., & Weinberg, M. S. (1978). Homosexualities: A study of diversity among men and women. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Bendixen, M., Asao, K., Wyckoff, J. P., Buss, D. M., & Kennair, L. E. O. (2017). Sexual regret in US and Norway: Effects of culture and individual differences in religiosity and mating strategy. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 246–251.Google Scholar
Bennett, C. H., Li, M., & Ma, B. (2003). Chain letters and evolutionary histories. Scientific American, 76–81.Google Scholar
Bentley, R. A., Hahn, M. W., & Shennan, S. J. (2004). Random drift and culture change. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 271, 1443–1450.Google Scholar
Berlin, B., & Kay, P. (1969). Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Berté, N. A. (1988). Kékch’i horticultural labor exchange: Productive and reproductive implications. In Betzig, L., Borgerhoff Mulder, M., & Turke, P. (Eds.), Human reproductive behavior (pp. 83–96). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Betzig, L. (1986). Despotism and differential reproduction: A Darwinian view of history. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.Google Scholar
Betzig, L. (1989). Causes of conjugal dissolution: A cross-cultural study. Current Anthropology, 30, 654–676.Google Scholar
Betzig, L. (2012). Means, variances, and ranges in reproductive success: Comparative evidence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 309–317.Google Scholar
Birkhead, T. R., & Møller, A. P. (1998). Sperm competition and sexual selection. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bixler, R. H. (1982). Comment on the incidence and purpose of royal sibling incest. American Ethnologist, 9, 580–582.Google Scholar
Bixler, R. H. (1992). Why littermates don’t: The avoidance of inbreeding depression. Annual Review of Sex Research, 3, 291–328.Google Scholar
Bleier, R. (1984). Science and gender: A critique of biology and its theories on women. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Blume, M. (2009). The reproductive benefits of religious affiliation. In Voland, E. & Schiefenhövel, W. (Eds.), The biological evolution of religious mind and behavior (pp. 117–126). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Blurton Jones, N. (1987). Tolerated theft: Suggestions about the ecology and evolution of sharing, hoarding, and scrounging. Social Science Information, 26, 31–54.Google Scholar
Bobrow, D., & Bailey, J. M. (2001). Is homosexuality maintained via kin selection? Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 361–368.Google Scholar
Boesch, C. (2003). Is culture a golden barrier between human and chimpanzee? Evolutionary Anthropology, 12, 82–91.Google Scholar
Boulet, M., Charpentier, M. J., & Drea, C. M. (2009). Decoding an olfactory mechanism of kin recognition and inbreeding avoidance in a primate. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 9, 281.Google Scholar
Boutwell, B. B., Barnes, J. C., & Beaver, K. M. (2014). When love dies: Further elucidating the existence of a mate ejection module. Review of General Psychology, 19, 30–38.Google Scholar
Bowles, S. (2009). Did warfare among ancestral hunter-gatherers affect the evolution of human social behaviors? Science, 324, 1293–1298.Google Scholar
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2011). A cooperative species: Human reciprocity and its evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boyer, P. (2001). Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Buckle, L., Gallup, G. G., & Todd, Z. A. (1996). Marriage as a reproductive contract: Patterns of marriage, divorce, and remarriage. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17, 363–377.Google Scholar
Burghardt, G. M. (2005). Genesis of animal play: Testing the limits. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Burnham, T. C., & Johnson, D. D. P. (2005). The biological and evolutionary logic of human cooperation. Analyse and Kritik, 27, 113–135.Google Scholar
Burns, A. (2000). Looking for love in intimate heterosexual relationships. Feminism and Psychology, 10, 481–485.Google Scholar
Burnstein, E., Crandall, C., & Kitayama, S. (1994). Some neo-Darwinian decision rules for altruism: Weighing cues for inclusive fitness as a function of the biological importance of the decision. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 773–789.Google Scholar
Burt, A., & Trivers, R. L. (2006). Genes in conflict: The biology of selfish genetic elements. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1988). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tactics of mate attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 616–628.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1996). Sexual conflict: Evolutionary insights into feminism and the “battle of the sexes”. In Buss, D. M. & Malamuth, N. M. (Eds.), Sex, power, conflict: Evolutionary and feminist perspectives (pp. 296–318). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (2003). Sexual strategies: A journey into controversy. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 219–226.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (2005). The murderer next door: Why the mind is designed to kill (5th ed.). New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (2014). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind (5th ed.). New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (2016). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating (rev. ed.). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., Goetz, C., Duntley, J. D., Asao, K., & Conroy-Beam, D. (2017). The mate switching hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 143–149.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J. (1992). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychological Science, 3, 251–255.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Larsen, R. J. (2001). A half century of mate preferences: The cultural evolution of values. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 491–503.Google Scholar
Campbell, A. (2002). A mind of her own: The evolutionary psychology of women. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, A. (2005). Feminism and evolutionary psychology. In Barkow, J. H. (Ed.), Missing the revolution: Darwinism for the social sciences (pp. 63–99). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Camperio-Ciani, A., Corna, F., & Capiluppi, C. (2004). Evidence for maternally inherited factors favouring male homosexuality and promoting female fecundity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 271, 2217–2221.Google Scholar
Carter, G. G., & Wilkinson, G. S. (2013). Food sharing in vampire bats: Reciprocal help predicts donations more than relatedness or harassment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 280, 20122573.Google Scholar
Carter, G. G., Wilkinson, G. S., & Page, R. A. (2017). Food-sharing vampire bats are more nepotistic under conditions of perceived risk. Behavioral Ecology, 28, 565–569.Google Scholar
Case, A. C., Lin, I.-F., & McLanahan, S. (1999). Household resource allocation in stepfamilies: Darwin reflects on the plight of Cinderella. American Economic Review, 89, 234–238.Google Scholar
Case, A. C., & Paxson, C. (2001). Mothers and others: Who invests in children’s health? Journal of Health Economics, 20, 301–328.Google Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., & Feldman, M. W. (1981). Cultural transmission and evolution: A quantitative approach. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., Menozzi, P., & Piazza, A. (1996). The history and geography of human genes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Changizi, M. (2011). Harnessed: How language and music mimicked nature and transformed ape to man. Dallas, TX: BenBella Books.Google Scholar
Chasin, B. (1977). Sociobiology: A sexist synthesis. Science for the People, 9, 27–31.Google Scholar
Cheney, D. L., & Seyfarth, R. M. (1990). How monkeys see the world: Inside the mind of another species. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Clark, R. D., & Hatfield, E. (1989). Gender differences in receptivity to sexual offers. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 2, 39–55.Google Scholar
Cloud, J. M., & Perilloux, C. (2014). Bodily attractiveness as a window to women’s fertility and reproductive value. In Weekes-Shackelford, V. A. & Shackelford, T. K. (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on human sexual psychology and behavior (pp. 135–152). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1991). The evolution of parental care. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T. H., & Vincent, A. C. J. (1991). Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females. Nature, 351, 58–60.Google Scholar
Cochran, G., & Harpending, H. (2009). The 10,000 year explosion: How civilization accelerated human evolution. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Collins, K. (2015). America’s most prolific wall punchers, charted. Quartz. Retrieved February 24, 2017, from https://qz.com/582720/americas-most-prolific-wall-punchers-charted/Google Scholar
Confer, J., Easton, J., Fleischman, D., et al. (2010). Evolutionary psychology: Controversies, questions, prospects, and limitations. American Psychologist, 65, 110–126.Google Scholar
Conley, T. D. (2011). Perceived proposer personality characteristics and gender differences in acceptance of casual sex offers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 309–329.Google Scholar
Cook, M., & Mineka, S. (1987). Second-order conditioning and overshadowing in the observational conditioning of fear in monkeys. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 25, 349–364.Google Scholar
Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 163–228). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cosmides, L., (1997). Evolutionary psychology: A primer. Center for Evolutionary Psychology. Retrieved March 26, 2015, from www.cep.ucsb.edu/primer.htmlGoogle Scholar
Coyne, J. A. (2011). Evolution 2011: Hot research – with cats! Why Evolution is True. Retrieved March 30, 2015, from https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2011/06/19/evolution-2011-hot-research—with-cats/Google Scholar
Cronin, H. (1991). The ant and the peacock: Altruism and sexual selection from Darwin to today. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cunningham, M. R., Roberts, A. R., Barbee, A. P., Druen, P. B., & Wu, C. H. (1995). “Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours”: Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 261–279.Google Scholar
Curry, O. S., Mullins, D. A., & Whitehouse, H. (2019). Is it good to cooperate? Testing the theory of morality-as-cooperation in 60 societies. Current Anthropology, 60, 47–69.Google Scholar
Curtis, V., de Barra, M., & Aunger, R. (2011). Disgust as an adaptive system for disease avoidance behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 366, 389–401.Google Scholar
Daly, M., Salmon, C., & Wilson, M. (1997). Kinship: The conceptual hole in psychological studies of social cognition and close relationships. In Simpson, J. A. & Kenrick, D. T. (Eds.), Evolutionary social psychology (pp. 265–296). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1982). Homicide and kinship. American Anthropologist, 84, 372–378.Google Scholar
Daly, M., (1987). The Darwinian psychology of discriminative parental solicitude. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 35, 91–144.Google Scholar
Daly, M., (1998). The truth about Cinderella: A Darwinian view of parental love. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Daly, M., (2001). An assessment of some proposed exceptions to the phenomenon of nepotistic discrimination against stepchildren. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 36, 287–296.Google Scholar
Daly, M., Wilson, M., & Weghorst, S. J. (1982). Male sexual jealousy. Ethology and Sociobiology, 3, 11–27.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of the species by means of natural selection. London: Murray.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: Murray.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1976/2016). The selfish gene (fortieth anniversary ed.). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1979). Twelve misunderstandings of kin selection. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 51, 184–200.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1982). The extended phenotype: The long reach of the gene. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1983). Universal Darwinism. In Bendall, D. S. (Ed.), Evolution from molecules to men (pp. 403–428). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1986). The blind watchmaker: Why the evidence of evolution reveals a universe without design. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1993). Viruses of the mind. In Dahlbom, B. (Ed.), Dennett and his critics: Demystifying mind (pp. 13–27). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1998). Unweaving the rainbow: Science, delusion, and the appetite for wonder. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
de Waal, F. B. M. (1996). Good natured: The origins of right and wrong in humans and other animals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
de Waal, F. B. M. (1997a). Bonobo: The forgotten ape. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
de Waal, F. B. M. (1997b). The chimpanzee’s service economy: Food for grooming. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 375–386.Google Scholar
de Waal, F. B. M. (2005). Our inner ape: A leading primatologist explains why we are who we are. New York: Riverhead Books.Google Scholar
Deacon, T. W. (1997). The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Deacon, T. W. (2013). Incomplete nature: How mind emerged from matter. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Deaner, R. O., & Smith, B. A. (2013). Sex differences in sports across 50 societies. Cross-Cultural Research, 47, 268–309.Google Scholar
DeBruine, L. M. (2002). Facial resemblance enhances trust. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 269, 1307–1312.Google Scholar
DeBruine, L. M. (2005). Trustworthy but not lust-worthy: Context-specific effects of facial resemblance. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 272, 919–922.Google Scholar
Dehaene, S. (2010). Reading in the brain: The new science of how we read. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Del Giudice, M. (2013). Multivariate misgivings: Is D a valid measure of group and sex differences? Evolutionary Psychology, 11, 147470491301100511.Google Scholar
Del Giudice, M., Booth, T., & Irwing, P. (2012). The distance between Mars and Venus: Measuring global sex differences in personality. PLoS ONE, 7, e29265.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin’s dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. New York: Simon & Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (2006). Breaking the spell: Religion as a natural phenomenon. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (2009). The cultural evolution of words and other thinking tools. Paper presented at the Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. Retrieved March 3, 2018, from http://ase.tufts.edu/cogstud/dennett/papers/coldspring.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (2017). From bacteria to Bach and back: The evolution of minds. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Diamond, J. (1997). Why is sex fun? The evolution of human sexuality. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Dixson, A. F. (1998). Primate sexuality: Comparative studies of the prosimians, monkeys, apes, and human beings. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dixson, B. J., Sagata, K., Linklater, W. L., & Dixson, A. F. (2010). Male preferences for female waist-to-hip ratio and body mass index in the highlands of Papua New Guinea. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 141, 620–625.Google Scholar
Dixson, B. J., & Vasey, P. L. (2012). Beards augment perceptions of men’s age, social status, and aggressiveness, but not attractiveness. Behavioral Ecology, 23, 481–490.Google Scholar
Dolivo, V., & Taborsky, M. (2015). Norway rats reciprocate help according to the quality of help they received. Biology Letters, 11, 20140959.Google Scholar
Dudley, S. A., & File, A. L. (2007). Kin recognition in an annual plant. Biology Letters, 3, 435–438.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1993). Coevolution of neocortical size, group size, and language in humans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 681–735.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1996). Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Dunn, E. W., Aknin, L. B., & Norton, M. I. (2008). Spending money on others promotes happiness. Science, 319, 1687–1688.Google Scholar
Durham, W. H. (1991). Coevolution: Genes, culture, and human diversity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H. (1995). The science and politics of comparing men and women. American Psychologist, 50, 145–158.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408–423.Google Scholar
Easton, D., & Hardy, J. W. (1997). The ethical slut: A practical guide to polyamory, open relationships and other adventures. Berkeley, CA: Celestial Arts.Google Scholar
Eaton, S. B., Konner, M., & Shostak, M. (1988). Stone Agers in the fast lane: Chronic degenerative diseases in evolutionary perspective. American Journal of Medicine, 84, 739–749.Google Scholar
Eens, M., & Pinxten, R. (2000). Sex-role reversal in vertebrates: Behavioural and endocrinological accounts. Behavioural Processes, 51, 135–147.Google Scholar
El Mouden, C., Burton-Chellew, M., Gardner, A., & West, S. A. (2012). What do humans maximize? In Okasha, S. & Binmore, K. (Eds.), Evolution and rationality: Decisions, co-operation and strategic behaviour (pp. 23–49). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, B. J., & Symons, D. (1990). Sex differences in sexual fantasy: An evolutionary approach. Journal of Sex Research, 4, 527–555.Google Scholar
Emlen, S. T. (1984). Cooperative breeding in birds and mammals. In Krebs, J. R. & Davies, N. B. (Eds.), Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach (pp. 305–339). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Emlen, S. T., & Wrege, P. H. (2004). Size dimorphism, intrasexual competition, and sexual selection in Wattled Jacana (Jacana jacana), a sex-role-reversed shorebird in Panama. Auk, 121, 391–403.Google Scholar
Essock-Vitale, S. M., & McGuire, M. (1980). Predictions derived from the theories of kin selection and reciprocation assessed by anthropological data. Ethology and Sociobiology, 1, 233–243.Google Scholar
Essock-Vitale, S. M., (1985). Women’s lives viewed from an evolutionary perspective: II. Patterns of helping. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6, 155–173.Google Scholar
Fausto-Sterling, A. (2000). Beyond difference: Feminism and evolutionary psychology. In Rose, H. & Rose, S. (Eds.), Alas poor Darwin: Arguments against evolutionary psychology (pp. 174–189). London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Fehr, E., & Gaechter, S. (2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415, 137–140.Google Scholar
Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2005). Manipulations of fundamental and formant frequencies influence the attractiveness of human male voices. Animal Behaviour, 69, 561–568.Google Scholar
Feingold, A. (1990). Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on romantic attraction: A comparison across five research paradigms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 981–993.Google Scholar
Feingold, A. (1992). Gender differences in mate selection preferences: A test of the paternal investment model. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 125–139.Google Scholar
Feingold, A., & Mazzella, R. (1998). Gender differences in body image are increasing. Psychological Science, 9, 190–195.Google Scholar
Fine, C. (2010). Delusions of gender: The real science behind sex differences. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Fine, C. (2017). Testosterone rex: Myths of sex, science, and society. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Fisher, H. E. (2006). Why we love, why we cheat. Ted. Retrieved March 3, 2018, from www.ted.com/talks/helen_fisher_tells_us_why_we_love_cheatGoogle Scholar
Fisher, H. E. (2008). The brain in love. Ted. Retrieved March 3, 2018, from www.ted.com/talks/helen_fisher_studies_the_brain_in_loveGoogle Scholar
Fisher, H. E. (2009). Why him? Why her? How to find and keep lasting love. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Fisher, H. E. (2016). Anatomy of love: A natural history of mating, marriage and why we stray (2nd ed.). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Fisher, H. E., Aron, A., Mashek, D., Li, H., & Brown, L. L. (2002). Defining the brain systems of lust, romantic attraction, and attachment. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 413–419.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1930). The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, C. J., Thomson, M. C., & Whittaker, M. B. (2010). Altruism between romantic partners: Biological offspring as a genetic bridge between altruist and recipient. Evolutionary Psychology, 8, 462–476.Google Scholar
Fletcher, G., Simpson, J. A., Campbell, L., & Overall, N. (2013). The science of intimate relationships. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Flinn, M. V. (1988). Step- and genetic parent/offspring relationships in a Caribbean village. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9, 1–34.Google Scholar
Ford, C. S., & Beach, F. A. (1951). Patterns of sexual behavior. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Freeman, D. (1983). Margaret Mead and Samoa: The making and unmaking of an anthropological myth. Canberra, ACT: Australian National University Press.Google Scholar
Friday, N. (1973). My secret garden: Women’s sexual fantasies. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1953). The methodology of positive economics. In Essays in positive economics (pp. 3–43). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, R. A. (2014). A natural fix for A.D.H.D. The New York Times. Retrieved March 27, 2015, from www.nytimes.com/2014/11/02/opinion/sunday/a-natural-fix-for-adhd.htmlGoogle Scholar
Frost, P. (2015). The fellowship instinct. Evo and Proud. Retrieved January 30, 2017, from http://evoandproud.blogspot.my/2015/11/the-fellowship-instinct.htmlGoogle Scholar
Gallup, G. G., Burch, R. L., & Mitchell, T. J. B. (2006). Semen displacement as a sperm competition strategy. Human Nature, 17, 253–264.Google Scholar
Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573–587.Google Scholar
Gardner, M. (2000). Kilroy was here. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved April 2, 2015, from http://articles.latimes.com/2000/mar/05/books/bk-5402Google Scholar
Geary, D. C. (1995). Reflections of evolution and culture in children’s cognition: Implications for mathematical development and instruction. American Psychologist, 50, 24–37.Google Scholar
Geary, D. C. (2010). Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Gettler, L. T., McDade, T. W., Feranil, A. B., & Kuzawa, C. W. (2011). Longitudinal evidence that fatherhood decreases testosterone in human males. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 16194–16199.Google Scholar
Gillings, M. R. (2014). Were there evolutionary advantages to premenstrual syndrome? Evolutionary Applications, 7, 897–904.Google Scholar
Gintis, H. (2000). Strong reciprocity and human sociality. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 206, 169–179.Google Scholar
Glocker, M. L., Langleben, D. D., Ruparel, K., Loughead, J. W., Gur, R. C., & Sachser, N. (2009). Baby schema in infant faces induces cuteness perception and motivation for caretaking in adults. Ethology, 115, 257–263.Google Scholar
Goodall, J. (1986). The chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gottfredson, L. S. (2007). Innovation, fatal accidents, and the evolution of general intelligence. In Roberts, M. J. (Ed.), Integrating the mind: Domain general versus domain specific processes in higher cognition (pp. 387–425). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Gottschall, J., Martin, J., Quish, H., & Rea, J. (2004). Sex differences in mate choice criteria are reflected in folktales from around the world and in historical European literature. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 102–112.Google Scholar
Gottschall, J., & Nordlund, M. (2006). Romantic love: A literary universal. Philosophy and Literature, 30, 432–452.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. (2000a). More things in heaven and earth. In Rose, H. & Rose, S. (Eds.), Alas poor Darwin: Arguments against evolutionary psychology (pp. 101–126). London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. (2000b). The spice of life: An interview with Stephen Jay Gould. Leader to Leader, 15, 14–19.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J., & Lewontin, R. C. (1979). The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian program: A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 205, 281–288.Google Scholar
Graham, P. (2010). The acceleration of addictiveness. PaulGraham.com. Retrieved March 30, 2015, from www.paulgraham.com/addiction.htmlGoogle Scholar
Gray, P. B., McHale, T. S., & Carré, J. M. (2017). A review of human male field studies of hormones and behavioral reproductive effort. Hormones and Behavior, 91, 52–67.Google Scholar
Griffin, A. S., West, S. A., & Buckling, A. (2004). Cooperation and competition in pathogenic bacteria. Nature, 430, 1024–1027.Google Scholar
Gurven, M., & Hill, K. (2009). Why do men hunt? A reevaluation of “Man the Hunter” and the sexual division of labor. Current Anthropology, 50, 51–74.Google Scholar
Gwynne, D. T., & Rentz, D. C. F. (1983). Beetles on the bottle: Male buprestids mistake stubbies for females (Coleoptera). Australian Journal of Entomology, 22, 79–80.Google Scholar
Haddad, W. A., Reisinger, R. R., Scott, T., Bester, M. N., & de Bruyn, P. J. N. (2015). Multiple occurrences of king penguin (Aptenodytes patagonicus) sexual harassment by Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella). Polar Biology, 38, 741–746.Google Scholar
Hagen, E. H. (2005). Controversial issues in evolutionary psychology. In Buss, D. M. (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 145–176). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hagen, E. H., & Hammerstein, P. (2006). Game theory and human evolution: A critique of some recent interpretations of experimental games. Theoretical Population Biology, 69, 339–348.Google Scholar
Hahn-Holbrook, J., & Haselton, M. (2014). Is postpartum depression a disease of modern civilization? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 395–400.Google Scholar
Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Halpern, D. F. (2012). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (4th ed.). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Hamer, D. H. (2004). The God gene: How faith is hardwired into our genes. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Hames, R. B. (1987). Relatedness and garden labor exchange among the Ye’kwana. Ethology and Sociobiology, 8, 354–392.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. (1963). The evolution of altruistic behavior. American Naturalist, 97, 354–356.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour: I & II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–52.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. (1996). Narrow roads of gene land: The collected papers of W. D. Hamilton. Oxford, UK: Freeman/Spektrum.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. D., & Zuk, M. (1982). Heritable true fitness and bright birds: A role for parasites? Science, 218, 384–387.Google Scholar
Hardy, K., Brand-Miller, J., Brown, K. D., Thomas, M. G., & Copeland, L. (2015). The importance of dietary carbohydrate in human evolution. Quarterly Review of Biology, 90, 251–268.Google Scholar
Harford, T. (2016). How to be a happier man. Men’s Health. Retrieved March 21, 2017, from www.menshealth.co.uk/healthy/stress/how-to-be-a-happier-manGoogle Scholar
Harpending, H. (2013). Ongoing evolution in humans. Paper presented at Culture- Gene Interactions in Human Origins CARTA Symposium. Retrieved March 3, 2018, from www.ucsd.tv/search-details.aspx?showID=24112Google Scholar
Harris, C. R. (2013). Humans, deer, and sea dragons: How evolutionary psychology has misconstrued human sex differences. Psychological Inquiry, 24, 195–201.Google Scholar
Harris, F. (1975). The short stories of Frank Harris: A selection. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, S. (Producer). (2016). Complexity and stupidity: A conversation with David Krakauer. Waking Up [Podcast]. Retrieved March 3, 2018, from https://samharris.org/complexity-stupidity/Google Scholar
Harvey, P. H., & Bradbury, J. W. (1991). Sexual selection. In Krebs, J. R. & Davies, N. B. (Eds.), Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach (3rd ed., pp. 203–233). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hawkes, K. (1991). Showing off: Tests of an hypothesis about men’s foraging goals. Ethology and Sociobiology, 12, 29–54.Google Scholar
Hawking, S. (2008). Stephen Hawking asks big questions about the universe. Ted. Retrieved March 3, 2018, from www.ted.com/talks/stephen_hawking_asks_big_questions_about_the_universeGoogle Scholar
Hawks, J., Wang, E. T., Cochran, G. M., Harpending, H. C., & Moyzis, R. K. (2007). Recent acceleration of human adaptive evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 20753–20758.Google Scholar
Henrich, J. (2004). Cultural group selection, coevolutionary processes and large-scale cooperation. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation, 53, 3–35.Google Scholar
Henrich, J. (2016). The secret of our success: How culture is driving human evolution, domesticating our species, and making us smarter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2012). The puzzle of monogamous marriage. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 367, 657–669.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 165–196.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–83.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., & McElreath, R. (2003). The evolution of cultural evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology, 12, 123–135.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., (2007). Dual-inheritance theory: The evolution of human cultural capacities and cultural evolution. In Dunbar, R. I. M. & Barrett, L. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 555–570). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hewlett, B. S. (1991). Intimate fathers: The nature and context of Aka pygmy paternal infant care. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Hill, K., & Hurtado, A. M. (1996). Aché life history: The ecology and demography of a foraging people. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hill, K. R., Walker, R. S., Božièeviæ, M., et al. (2011). Co-residence patterns in hunter-gatherer societies show unique human social structure. Science, 331, 1286–1289.Google Scholar
Hinde, R. A., & Barden, L. (1985). The evolution of the teddy bear. Animal Behaviour, 33, 1371–1373.Google Scholar
Hoffman, J. I., Forcada, J., Trathan, P. N., & Amos, W. (2007). Female fur seals show active choice for males that are heterozygous and unrelated. Nature, 445, 912–914.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Holmboe, S. A., Priskorn, L., Jørgensen, N., et al. (2017). Influence of marital status on testosterone levels: A ten year follow-up of 1113 men. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 80, 155–161.Google Scholar
Holmes, W. G., & Sherman, P. W. (1982). The ontogeny of kin recognition in two species of ground squirrels. American Zoologist, 22, 491–517.Google Scholar
Hrdy, S. B. (2000). Mother nature: Maternal instincts and how they shape the human species. New York: Ballentine Books.Google Scholar
Hrdy, S. B. (2009). Mothers and others: The evolutionary origin of mutual understanding. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, J. (2011). On the origin of tepees: The evolution of ideas (and ourselves). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, S. M., Dispenza, F., & Gallup, G. G. (2003). Sex differences in morphological predictors of sexual behavior: Shoulder to hip and waist to hip ratios. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 173–178.Google Scholar
Jablonski, N. G. (2006). Skin: A natural history. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Jaeggi, A. V., & Gurven, M. (2013). Reciprocity explains food sharing in humans and other primates independent of kin selection and tolerated scrounging: A phylogenetic meta-analysis. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 280, 20131615.Google Scholar
James, W. (1880). Great men, great thoughts, and the environment. Atlantic Monthly, 66, 441–459.Google Scholar
Janicke, T., Häderer, I. K., Lajeunesse, M. J., & Anthes, N. (2016). Darwinian sex roles confirmed across the animal kingdom. Science Advances, 2, e1500983.Google Scholar
Jankowiak, W., & Diderich, M. (2000). Sibling solidarity in a polygamous community in the USA: Unpacking inclusive fitness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 125–139.Google Scholar
Jankowiak, W. R., & Fischer, E. F. (1992). A cross-cultural perspective on romantic love. Ethnology, 31, 149–156.Google Scholar
Jankowiak, W. R., Nell, M. D., & Buckmaster, A. (2002). Managing infidelity: A cross-cultural perspective. Ethnology, 41, 85–101.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. C. (1996). Attributes of Carnegie medalists performing acts of heroism and of the recipients of these acts. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17, 355–362.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. (2010). Where good ideas come from: The natural history of innovation. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Johnston, V. S., & Franklin, M. (1993). Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 183–199.Google Scholar
Jones, B. C., Hahn, A. C., Fisher, C. I., et al. (2018). No evidence that more physically attractive women have higher estradiol or progesterone. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 98, 1–5.Google Scholar
Jordan, B. K., Mohammed, M., Ching, S. T., et al. (2001). Up-regulation of WNT-4 signaling and dosage-sensitive sex reversal in humans. American Journal of Human Genetics, 68, 1102–1109.Google Scholar
Joshi, P. K., Esko, T., Mattsson, H., et al. (2015). Directional dominance on stature and cognition in diverse human populations. Nature, 523, 459–462.Google Scholar
Judge, D. S., & Hrdy, S. B. (1992). Allocation of accumulated resources among close kin: Inheritance in Sacramento, California, 1890–1984. Ethology and Sociobiology, 13, 495–522.Google Scholar
Jussim, L. (2012). Social perception and social reality: Why accuracy dominates bias and self-fulfilling prophecy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kahlenberg, S. M., & Wrangham, R. W. (2010). Sex differences in chimpanzees’ use of sticks as play objects resemble those of children. Current Biology, 20, R1067–1068.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science, 306, 1776–1780.Google Scholar
Kaplan, H. (1994). Evolutionary and wealth flow theories of fertility: Empirical tests and new models. Population and Development Review, 20, 753–791.Google Scholar
Kaplan, H., Hill, K., Lancaster, J., & Hurtado, A. M. (2000). A theory of human life history evolution: Diet, intelligence and longevity. Evolutionary Anthropology, 9, 156–185.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, E. (2010). Shall the rich inherit the Earth? Demography and politics in the twenty-first century. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
Kellogg, W. N., & Kellogg, L. A. (1933). The ape and the child: A comparative study of the environmental influence upon early behavior. New York: Hafner.Google Scholar
Kendal, R., Hopper, L. M., Whiten, A., et al. (2014). Chimpanzees copy dominant and knowledgeable individuals: Implications for cultural diversity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36, 65–72.Google Scholar
Kennair, L. E. O., Bendixen, M., & Buss, D. M. (2016). Sexual regret. Evolutionary Psychology, 14, 1474704916682903.Google Scholar
Kenrick, D. T., Groth, G., Trost, M. R., & Sadalla, E. K. (1993). Integrating evolutionary and social exchange perspectives on relationships: Effects of gender, self-appraisal, and involvement level on mate selection criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 951–969.Google Scholar
Kenrick, D. T., & Keefe, R. C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 75–133.Google Scholar
Kenrick, D. T., Keefe, R. C., Bryan, A., Barr, A., & Brown, S. (1995). Age preferences and mate choice among homosexuals and heterosexuals: A case for modular psychological mechanisms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1166–1172.Google Scholar
Kenrick, D. T., & Sheets, V. (1993). Homicidal fantasies. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 231–246.Google Scholar
King, R. (2013). Baby got back: Some brief observations on obesity in ancient female figurines: Limited support for waist to hip ratio constant as a signal of fertility. Journal of Obesity and Weight Loss Therapy, 3, 1000159.Google Scholar
King, R., & Belsky, J. (2012). A typological approach to testing the evolutionary functions of human female orgasm. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1145–1160.Google Scholar
Kirby, S., Cornish, H., & Smith, K. (2008). Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 10681–10686.Google Scholar
Kordsmeyer, T. L., & Penke, L. (2017). The association of three indicators of developmental instability with mating success in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38, 704–713.Google Scholar
Kruger, D. J., & Nesse, R. M. (2006). An evolutionary life-history framework for understanding sex differences in human mortality rates. Human Nature, 17, 74–97.Google Scholar
Krupp, D. B., DeBruine, L. M., & Barclay, P. (2008). A cue to kinship promotes cooperation for the public good. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 49–55.Google Scholar
Kuhle, B. X. (2011). Did you have sex with him? Do you love her? An in vivo test of sex differences in jealous interrogations. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 1044–1047.Google Scholar
Kurzban, R. (2002). Alas poor evolutionary psychology: Unfairly accused, unjustly condemned. Human Nature Review, 2, 99–109.Google Scholar
Labuda, D., Lefebvre, J.-F., Nadeau, P., & Roy-Gagnon, M.-H. (2010). Female-to-male breeding ratio in modern humans: An analysis based on historical recombinations. American Journal of Human Genetics, 86, 353–363.Google Scholar
Laland, K. N. (2017). Darwin’s unfinished symphony: How culture made the human mind. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Laland, K. N., & Brown, G. R. (2002). Sense and nonsense: Evolutionary perspectives on human behaviour. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Laland, K. N., Uller, T., Feldman, M., et al. (2014). Does evolutionary theory need a rethink? Nature, 514, 161–164.Google Scholar
Lamminmäki, A., Hines, M., Kuiri-Hänninen, T., et al. (2012). Testosterone measured in infancy predicts subsequent sex-typed behavior in boys and in girls. Hormones and Behavior, 61, 611–616.Google Scholar
Langlois, J. H., Roggman, L. A., Casey, R. J., et al. (1987). Infant preferences for attractive faces: Rudiments of a stereotype? Developmental Psychology, 23, 363–369.Google Scholar
Larmuseau, M. H. D., Vanoverbeke, J., Van Geystelen, A., et al. (2013). Low historical rates of cuckoldry in a Western European human population traced by Y-chromosome and genealogical data. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 280, 20132400.Google Scholar
Lassek, W. D., & Gaulin, S. J. C. (2009). Costs and benefits of fat-free muscle mass in men: Relationship to mating success, dietary requirements, and native immunity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 322–328.Google Scholar
LeBoeuf, B. J. (1974). The hectic life of the alpha bull: Elephant seal as fighter and lover. Psychology Today, 8, 104–108.Google Scholar
Lee, S., & Hasegawa, T. (2014). Oceanic barriers promote language diversification in the Japanese Islands. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 27, 1905–1912.Google Scholar
Legare, C. H., & Nielsen, M. (2015). Imitation and innovation: The dual engines of cultural learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19, 688–699.Google Scholar
LeVay, S. (2011). Gay, straight, and the reason why: The science of sexual orientation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levitan, D. (2006). This is your brain on music: The science of a human obsession. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Li, G., Kung, K. T., & Hines, M. (2017). Childhood gender-typed behavior and adolescent sexual orientation: A longitudinal population-based study. Developmental Psychology, 53, 764–777.Google Scholar
Li, N. P., Bailey, J. M., & Kenrick, D. T. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the tradeoffs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 947–955.Google Scholar
Liao, X., Rong, S., & Queller, D. C. (2015). Relatedness, conflict, and the evolution of eusociality. PLoS Biology, 13, e1002098.Google Scholar
Lieberman, D., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2007). The architecture of human kin detection. Nature, 445, 727–731.Google Scholar
Lieberman, D. E. (2013). The story of the human body: Evolution, health, and disease. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Lihoreau, M., Zimmer, C., & Rivault, C. (2007). Kin recognition and incest avoidance in a group-living insect. Behavioral Ecology, 18, 880–887.Google Scholar
Lippa, R. A. (2009). Sex differences in sex drive, sociosexuality, and height across 53 nations: Testing evolutionary and social structural theories. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 631–651.Google Scholar
Lishner, D. A., Nguyen, S., Stocks, E. L., & Zillmer, E. J. (2008). Are sexual and emotional infidelity equally upsetting to men and women? Making sense of forced-choice responses. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 667–675.Google Scholar
Litchfield, H. E. (Ed.). (1904). Emma Darwin, wife of Charles Darwin: A century of family letters. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Littlefield, C. H., & Rushton, J. P. (1986). When a child dies: The sociobiology of bereavement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 797–802.Google Scholar
Lloyd, E. A. (2006). The case of the female orgasm: Bias in the science of evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lonsdorf, E. V. (2017). Sex differences in nonhuman primate behavioral development. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 95, 213–221.Google Scholar
López, P., Muñoz, A., & Martín, J. (2002). Symmetry, male dominance and female mate preferences in the Iberian rock lizard, Lacerta monticola. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 52, 342–347.Google Scholar
Lorenz, K. (1943). Die angeborenen formen möglicher erfahrung. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 5, 235–409.Google Scholar
Low, B. S. (1989). Cross-cultural patterns in the training of children: An evolutionary perspective. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 103, 311–319.Google Scholar
Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Kell, H. J. (2014). Life paths and accomplishments of mathematically precocious males and females four decades later. Psychological Science, 25, 2217–2232.Google Scholar
Lukas, D., & Huchard, E. (2014). The evolution of infanticide by males in mammalian societies. Science, 346, 841–844.Google Scholar
Lumsden, C. J., & Wilson, E. O. (1981). Genes, mind, and behavior: The coevolutionary process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, A. (1996). Thought contagion: How belief spreads through society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Maccoby, E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mace, R., & Holden, C. J. (2005). A phylogenetic approach to cultural evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20, 116–121.Google Scholar
Mach, E. (1896). On the part played by accident in invention and discovery. Monist, 6, 161–175.Google Scholar
Madsen, E., Tunney, R., Fieldman, G., et al. (2007). Kinship and altruism: A cross-cultural experimental study. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 339–359.Google Scholar
Mann, J. (1992). Nurturance or negligence: Maternal psychology and behavioral preference among preterm twins. In Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 367–390). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, G. (2012). Guitar zero: The science of becoming musical at any age. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Marks, I. M., & Nesse, R. M. (1994). Fear and fitness: An evolutionary analysis of anxiety disorders. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 247–261.Google Scholar
Marlowe, F. W. (1999a). Male care and mating effort among Hadza foragers. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 46, 57–64.Google Scholar
Marlowe, F. W. (1999b). Showoffs or providers? The parenting effort of Hadza men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 391–404.Google Scholar
Marlowe, F. W. (2000). Paternal investment and the human mating system. Behavioural Processes, 51, 45–61.Google Scholar
Marlowe, F. W. (2003a). A critical period for provisioning by Hadza men: Implications for pair bonding. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 217–229.Google Scholar
Marlowe, F. W. (2003b). The mating system of foragers in the Standard Cross-Cultural Sample. Cross-Cultural Research, 37, 282–306.Google Scholar
Marlowe, F. W. (2004). Mate preferences among Hadza hunter-gatherers. Human Nature, 15, 365–376.Google Scholar
Massen, J. J. M., Dusch, K., Eldakar, O. T., & Gallup, A. C. (2014). A thermal window for yawning in humans: Yawning as a brain cooling mechanism. Physiology and Behavior, 130, 145–148.Google Scholar
Massen, J. J. M., Ritter, C., & Bugnyar, T. (2015). Tolerance and reward equity predict cooperation in ravens (Corvus corax). Scientific Reports, 5, 15021.Google Scholar
Matzke, N. J. (2015). The evolution of antievolution policies after Kitzmiller v. Dover. Science, 38, 28–30.Google Scholar
McClintock, E. A. (2011). Handsome wants as handsome does: Physical attractiveness and gender differences in revealed sexual preferences. Biodemography and Social Biology, 57, 221–257.Google Scholar
McClure, B. (2004). Reproductive biology: Pillow talk in plants. Nature, 429, 249–250.Google Scholar
McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Mead, M. (1928). Coming of age in Samoa: A psychological study of primitive youth for Western civilization. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
Melfi, V. (2005). Red baboon bottoms as sexual traffic lights. The Naked Scientists [Podcast]. Retrieved January 26, 2015, from www.thenakedscientists.com/podcasts/naked-scientists/animal-communication-sexual-signalling-and-emotionsGoogle Scholar
Mencken, H. L. (1916/1982). A Mencken chrestomathy: His own selection of his choicest writings. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Mesoudi, A. (2011). Cultural evolution: How Darwinian theory can explain human culture and unify the social sciences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Miller, G. F. (2000a). Evolution of human music through sexual selection. In Wallin, N. L., Merker, B., & Brown, S. (Eds.), The origins of music (pp. 329–360). Harvard, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Miller, G. F. (2000b). The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Miller, G. F. (2007). Sexual selection for moral virtues. Quarterly Review of Biology, 82, 97–125.Google Scholar
Miller, G. F. (2013). Mutual mate choice models as the red pill in evolutionary psychology: Long delayed, much needed, ideologically challenging, and hard to swallow. Psychological Inquiry, 24, 207–210.Google Scholar
Millward, J. (2013). Deep inside: A study of 10,000 porn stars and their careers. Jon Millward Data Journalist. Retrieved February 24, 2017, from http://jonmillward.com/blog/studies/deep-inside-a-study-of-10000-porn-stars/Google Scholar
Moeliker, C. W. (2001). The first case of homosexual necrophilia in the mallard Anas platyrhynchos (Aves: Anatidae). Deinsea, 8, 243–247.Google Scholar
Møller, A. P. (1993). Female preference for apparently symmetrical male sexual ornaments in the barn swallow Hirundo rustica. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 32, 371–376.Google Scholar
Møller, A. P. (1997). Developmental stability and fitness: A review. American Naturalist, 149, 916–932.Google Scholar
Møller, A. P., & Birkhead, T. R. (1993). Certainty of paternity covaries with paternal care in birds. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 33, 261–268.Google Scholar
Morris, C. (2016). Porn’s dirtiest secret: What everyone gets paid. CNBC. Retrieved February 24, 2017, from www.cnbc.com/2016/01/20/porns-dirtiest-secret-what-everyone-gets-paid.htmlGoogle Scholar
Muller, M. N., Thompson, M. E., & Wrangham, R. W. (2006). Male chimpanzees prefer mating with old females. Current Biology, 16, 2234–2238.Google Scholar
Muniz, L., Perry, S., Manson, J. H., et al. (2006). Father-daughter avoidance in a wild primate population. Current Biology, 16, R156–157.Google Scholar
Murdock, G. P. (1967). Ethnographic atlas. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Murdock, G. P., & Provost, C. (1973). Factors in the division of labor by sex: A cross-cultural analysis. Ethnology, 12, 203–225.Google Scholar
Nedelec, J. L., & Beaver, K. M. (2014). Physical attractiveness as a phenotypic marker of health: An assessment using a nationally representative sample of American adults. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 456–463.Google Scholar
Needham, J. (1970). Clerks and craftsmen in China and the West: Lectures and addresses on the history of science and technology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nesse, R. M. (2006). Why a lot of people with selfish genes are pretty nice except for their hatred of The Selfish Gene. In Grafen, A. & Ridley, M. (Eds.), Richard Dawkins: How a scientist changed the way we think: Reflections by scientists, writers, and philosophers (pp. 203–212). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nesse, R. M., & Williams, G. C. (1994). Why we get sick: The new science of Darwinian medicine. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Newberry, M. G., Ahern, C. A., Clark, R., & Plotkin, J. B. (2017). Detecting evolutionary forces in language change. Nature, 551, 223–226.Google Scholar
Neyer, F. J., & Lang, F. R. (2003). Blood is thicker than water: Kinship orientation across adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 310–321.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1886/1966). Beyond good and evil: Prelude to a philosophy of the future (W. Kaufmann, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Norenzayan, A. (2013). Big gods: How religion transformed cooperation and conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (1992). Tit for tat in heterogeneous populations. Nature, 355, 250–253.Google Scholar
Nowak, M. A., Tarnita, C. E., & Wilson, E. O. (2010). The evolution of eusociality. Nature, 466, 1057–1062.Google Scholar
Oberzaucher, E., & Grammer, K. (2014). The case of Moulay Ismael – fact or fancy? PLoS ONE, 9, e85292.Google Scholar
Ogas, O., & Gaddam, S. (2011). A billion wicked thoughts: What the Internet tells us about sexual relationships. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Öhman, A., & Mineka, S. (2001). Fears, phobias and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 108, 483–522.Google Scholar
Orians, G. H. (1969). On the evolution of mating systems in birds and mammals. American Naturalist, 28, 1–16.Google Scholar
Paczolt, K. A., & Jones, A. G. (2010). Post-copulatory sexual selection and sexual conflict in the evolution of male pregnancy. Nature, 464, 401–404.Google Scholar
Pagel, M. (2012). Wired for culture: Origins of the human social mind. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Parker, G. A. (1970). Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biological Reviews, 45, 525–567.Google Scholar
Parker, K., & Wang, W. (2013). Modern parenthood: Roles of moms and dads converge as they balance work and family. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
Pasterski, V. L., Geffner, M. E., Brain, C., et al. (2005). Prenatal hormones and postnatal socialization by parents as determinants of male-typical toy play in girls with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Child Development, 76, 264–278.Google Scholar
Pasterski, V., Hindmarsh, P., Geffner, M., et al. (2007 ). Increased aggression and activity level in 3- to 11-year-old girls with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH). Hormones and Behavior, 52, 368–374.Google Scholar
Pedersen, F. A. (1991). Secular trends in human sex ratios: Their influence on individual and family behavior. Human Nature, 2, 271–291.Google Scholar
Pelé, M., Bonnefoy, A., Shimada, M., & Sueur, C. (2017). Interspecies sexual behaviour between a male Japanese macaque and female sika deer. Primates, 58, 275–278.Google Scholar
Penn, D., & Potts, W. (1998). MHC-disassortative mating preferences reversed by cross-fostering. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 265, 1299–1306.Google Scholar
Perrett, D. (2010). In your face: The new science of human attraction. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Perry, G. H., Dominy, N. J., Claw, K.G., et al. (2007). Diet and the evolution of human amylase gene copy number variation. Nature Genetics, 39, 1256–1260.Google Scholar
Perry, S. (2011). Social traditions and social learning in capuchin monkeys (Cebus). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 366, 988–996.Google Scholar
Petrie, M., & Kempenaers, B. (1998). Extra-pair paternity in birds: Explaining variation between species and populations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13, 52–58.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct: The new science of language and mind. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (2002). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (2011). The better angels of our nature: Why violence has declined. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (2012). The false allure of group selection. Edge.org. Retrieved May 20, 2013, from http://edge.org/conversation/the-false-allure-of-group-selectionGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. (2018). Enlightenment now: The case for reason, science, humanism, and progress. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Pinker, S., & Bloom, P. (1992). Natural language and natural selection. In Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 451–493). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, Susan. (2008). The sexual paradox: Troubled boys, gifted girls, and the real difference between the sexes. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Polderman, T. J. C., Benyamin, B., de Leeuw, C. A., et al. (2015). Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies. Nature Genetics, 47, 702–709.Google Scholar
Pollan, M. (1990). The botany of desire: A plant’s-eye view of the world. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1979). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Pound, N., Lawson, D. W., Toma, A. M., et al. (2014). Facial fluctuating asymmetry is not associated with childhood ill-health in a large British cohort study. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 281, 20141639.Google Scholar
Power, M., & Schulkin, J. (2009). The evolution of obesity. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Prentiss, A. M., Skelton, R. R., Eldredge, N., & Quinn, C. (2011). Get rad! The evolution of the skateboard deck. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 4, 379–389.Google Scholar
Price, M. E. (2012). Group selection theories are now more sophisticated, but are they more predictive? Evolutionary Psychology, 10, 45–49.Google Scholar
Principe, G. (2012). Orangutans on Ritalin: An evolutionary developmental psychology perspective on ADHD. This View of Life. Retrieved March 27, 2015, from https://evolution-institute.org/article/orangutans-on-ritalin-an-evolutionary-developmental-psychology-perspective/Google Scholar
Pusey, A. (2004). Inbreeding avoidance in primates. In Wolf, A. P. & Durham, D. H. (Eds.), Inbreeding, incest, and the incest taboo. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Puts, D. A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 157–175.Google Scholar
Puts, D. A., Dawood, K., & Welling, L. L. M. (2012). Why women have orgasms: An evolutionary analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1127–1143.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, K. (1927). Across Arctic America: Narrative of the Fifth Thüle Expedition. Fairbanks, AK: University of Alaska Press.Google Scholar
Ray, D. W. (2009). The God virus: How religion infects our lives and culture. Bonner Springs, KS: IPC Press.Google Scholar
Reser, J. E. (2011). Conceptualizing the autism spectrum in terms of natural selection and behavioral ecology: The solitary forager hypothesis. Evolutionary Psychology, 9, 207–238.Google Scholar
Revonsuo, A. (2000). The reinterpretation of dreams: An evolutionary hypothesis of the function of dreaming. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 877–901.Google Scholar
Richerson, P. J., Baldini, R., Bell, A., et al. (2016). Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, e30.Google Scholar
Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Richerson, P. J., Boyd, R., & Henrich, J. (2010). Gene–culture coevolution in the age of genomics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 7, 8985–8992.Google Scholar
Ridley, M. (1993). The red queen: Sex and the evolution of human nature. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Ridley, M. (1996). The origins of virtue: Human instincts and the evolution of cooperation. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Ridley, M. (2010). The rational optimist: How prosperity evolves. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Rohwer, S., Herron, J. C., & Daly, M. (1999). Stepparental behavior as mating effort in birds and other animals. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 367–390.Google Scholar
Rozin, P., Haidt, J., & McCauley, C. R. (1993). Disgust. In Lewis, M. & Haviland, J. M. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 575–594). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, C., & Jethá, C. (2010). Sex at dawn: The prehistoric origins of modern sexuality. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Saad, G., & Gill, T. (2003). An evolutionary psychology perspective on gift giving among young adults. Psychology and Marketing, 20, 765–784.Google Scholar
Sagarin, B. J., Martin, A. L., Coutinho, S. A., et al. (2012). Sex differences in jealousy: A meta-analytic examination. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 595–614.Google Scholar
Salmon, C. A. (2012). The pop culture of sex: An evolutionary window on the worlds of pornography and romance. Review of General Psychology, 16, 152–160.Google Scholar
Sasaki, T., & Biro, D. (2017). Cumulative culture can emerge from collective intelligence in animal groups. Nature Communications, 8, 15049.Google Scholar
Saxon, L. (2012). Sex at dusk: Lifting the shiny wrapping from Sex at Dawn. Lexington, KY: Createspace.Google Scholar
Scelza, B. A. (2014). Jealousy in a small-scale, natural fertility population: The roles of paternity, investment and love in jealous response. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 103–108.Google Scholar
Schärer, L., Rowe, L., & Arnqvist, G. (2012). Anisogamy, chance and the evolution of sex roles. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 27, 260–264.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. (2004). Ancient Egyptian sibling marriage and the Westermarck effect. In Wolf, A. P. & Durham, W. H. (Eds.), Inbreeding, incest, and the incest taboo: The state of knowledge at the turn of the century (pp. 93–108). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 247–275.Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P. (2014). Evaluating evidence of mate preference adaptations: How do we really know what Homo sapiens sapiens really want? In Weekes-Shackelford, V. A. & Shackelford, T. K. (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on human sexual psychology and behavior (pp. 3–39). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P., & Pilcher, J. J. (2004). Evaluating evidence of psychological adaptation: How do we know one when we see one? Psychological Science, 15, 643–649.Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P., & 118 Members of the International Sexuality Description Project. (2003). Universal sex differences in the desire for sexual variety: Tests from 52 nations, 6 continents, and 13 islands. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 85–104.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, A. (1818/1966). The world as will and representation, Vol. II: Supplements to the fourth book (E. F. J. Payne, Trans.). New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Scott, I. M. L., Clark, A. P., Boothroyd, L. G., & Penton-Voak, I. S. (2013). Do men’s faces really signal heritable immunocompetence? Behavioral Ecology, 24, 579–589.Google Scholar
Sear, R., & Mace, R. (2008). Who keeps children alive? A review of the effects of kin on child survival. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 1–18.Google Scholar
Segerstråle, U. (2000). Defenders of the truth: The sociobiology debate. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Seligman, M. E. P., & Hager, J. L. (Eds.). (1990). Biological boundaries of learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Sell, A., Lukazsweski, A. W., & Townsley, M. (2017). Cues of upper body strength account for most of the variance in men’s bodily attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 284, 20171819.Google Scholar
Seyfarth, R. M., & Cheney, D. L. (1984). Grooming alliances and reciprocal alliances in vervet monkeys. Nature, 308, 541–543.Google Scholar
Shackelford, T. K., & Goetz, A. T. (2006). Comparative evolutionary psychology of sperm competition. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 120, 139–146.Google Scholar
Shackelford, T. K., & Larsen, R. J. (1997). Facial asymmetry as an indicator of psychological, emotional, and physiological distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 456–466.Google Scholar
Shackelford, T. K., Voracek, M., Schmitt, D. P., et al. (2004). Romantic jealousy in early adulthood and in later life. Human Nature, 15, 283–300.Google Scholar
Shepher, J. (1971). Mate selection among second generation kibbutz adolescents and adults: Incest avoidance and negative imprinting. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 1, 293–307.Google Scholar
Sherman, P. W. (1977). Nepotism and the evolution of alarm calls. Science, 197, 1246–1253.Google Scholar
Sherman, P. W. (1980). The limits of ground squirrel nepotism. In Barlow, G. B. & Silverberg, J. (Eds.), Sociobiology: Beyond nature/nurture? AAAS Selected Symposium 35 (pp. 505–544). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Shermer, M. (2004). The science of good and evil: Why people cheat, gossip, care, share, and follow the Golden Rule. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Shermer, M. (2009). The mind of the market: How biology and psychology shape our economic lives. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Shubin, N. (2008). Your inner fish: A journey into the 3.5 billion-year history of the human body. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Simoons, F. J. (1969). Primary adult lactose intolerance and the milking habit: A problem in biological and cultural interrelations. American Journal of Digestive Diseases, 14, 819–836.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 870–883.Google Scholar
Singer, P. (1981). The expanding circle: Ethics and sociobiology. New York: Farrar, Strauss, & Giroux.Google Scholar
Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 293–307.Google Scholar
Singh, D. (1995). Female judgment of male attractiveness and desirability for relationships: Role of waist-to-hip ratio and financial status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1089–1101.Google Scholar
Singh, D., Dixson, B. J., Jessop, T. S., Morgan, B., & Dixson, A. F. (2010). Cross-cultural consensus for waist–hip ratio and women’s attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 176–181.Google Scholar
Singh, D., & Luis, S. (1995). Ethnic and gender consensus for the effect of waist-to-hip ratio on judgement of women’s attractiveness. Human Nature, 6, 51–65.Google Scholar
Slater, A., Quinn, P. C., Hayes, R., & Brown, E. (2000). The role of facial orientation in newborn infants’ preference for attractive faces. Developmental Science, 3, 181–185.Google Scholar
Smith, E. A., Bird, R. B., & Bird, D. W. (2003). The benefits of costly signaling: Meriam turtle hunters. Behavioral Ecology, 14, 116–126.Google Scholar
Smith, E. A., Hill, K., Marlowe, F., et al. (2010). Wealth transmission and inequality among hunter-gatherers. Current Anthropology, 51, 19–34.Google Scholar
Smith, M. S., Kish, B. J., & Crawford, C. B. (1987). Inheritance of wealth as human kin investment. Ethology and Sociobiology, 8, 171–182.Google Scholar
Smith, R. L. (1984). Human sperm competition. In Smith, R. L. (Ed.), Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems (pp. 601–659). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sober, E., & Wilson, D. S. (1998). Unto others: The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sohn, K. (2016). Men’s revealed preferences regarding women’s ages: Evidence from prostitution. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37, 272–280.Google Scholar
Sohn, K. (2017). Men’s revealed preference for their mates’ ages. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38, 58–62.Google Scholar
Sommer, V., & Reichard, U. (2000). Rethinking monogamy: The gibbon case. In Kappeler, P. (Ed.), Primate males (pp. 159–168). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sommers, C. H. (2013a). Freedom feminism: Its surprising history and why it matters today. Washington, DC: AEI Press.Google Scholar
Sommers, C. H. (2013b). The war against boys: How misguided policies are harming our young men (rev. ed.). New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Sommers, C. H. (2013c). What “lean in” misunderstands about gender differences. The Atlantic. Retrieved January 12, 2017, from www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/2013/03/what-lean-in-misunderstands-about-gender-differences/274138/Google Scholar
Sperber, D. (1985). Anthropology and psychology: Towards an epidemiology of representations. Man, 20, 73–89.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stack, S. (1987). Celebrities and suicide: A taxonomy and analysis, 1948–1983. American Sociological Review, 52, 401–412.Google Scholar
Starr, S. B. (2015). Estimating gender disparities in federal criminal cases. American Law and Economics Review, 17, 127–159.Google Scholar
Stephen, I. D., Hiew, V., Coetzee, V., Tiddeman, B. P., & Perrett, D. I. (2017). Facial shape analysis identifies valid cues to aspects of physiological health in Caucasian, Asian, and African populations. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1883.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93, 119–135.Google Scholar
Stewart-Williams, S. (2002). Gender, the perception of aggression, and the overestimation of gender bias. Sex Roles, 46, 177–189.Google Scholar
Stewart-Williams, S. (2007). Altruism among kin vs. nonkin: Effects of cost of help and reciprocal exchange. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 193–198.Google Scholar
Stewart-Williams, S. (2008). Human beings as evolved nepotists: Exceptions to the rule and effects of cost of help. Human Nature, 19, 414–425.Google Scholar
Stewart-Williams, S. (2010). Darwin, God, and the meaning of life: How evolutionary theory undermines everything you thought you knew. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stewart-Williams, S. (2014). The sticking point: Why men still outnumber women in science. Psychology Today. Retrieved January 12, 2017, from www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-nature-nurture-nietzsche-blog/201402/the-sticking-point-why-men-still-outnumber-women-inGoogle Scholar
Stewart-Williams, S. (2015a). Evolution and morality. In Wright, J. D. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (2nd ed., Vol. XV, pp. 811–818). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Stewart-Williams, S. (2015b). Foreword: On the origin of afterlife beliefs by means of memetic selection. In Martin, M. & Augustine, K. (Eds.), The myth of afterlife: Essays on the case against life after death (pp. xiii–xxv). Jefferson, NC: McFarland.Google Scholar
Stewart-Williams, S. (2017). The science of human sex differences: Implications for policy on gender equity. Gifted Women, Fragile Men. Retrieved March 21, 2017, from http://euromind.global/steve-stewart-williams/Google Scholar
Stewart-Williams, S. (in press-a). Afterlife beliefs: An evolutionary approach. In Wulff, D. M. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of the psychology of religion (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stewart-Williams, S. (in press-b). Are humans peacocks or robins? In Workman, L., Reader, W., & Barkow, J. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of evolutionary perspectives on human behavior (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stewart-Williams, S., Butler, C. A., & Thomas, A. G. (2017). Sexual history and present attractiveness: People want a mate with a bit of a past, but not too much. Journal of Sex Research, 54, 1097–1105.Google Scholar
Stewart-Williams, S., & Thomas, A. G. (2013a). The ape that kicked the hornet’s nest: Response to commentaries on “The ape that thought it was a peacock”. Psychological Inquiry, 24, 248–271.Google Scholar
Stewart-Williams, S., (2013b). The ape that thought it was a peacock: Does evolutionary psychology exaggerate human sex differences? Psychological Inquiry, 24, 137–168.Google Scholar
Strassmann, B. I. (1997). The biology of menstruation in Homo sapiens: Total lifetime menses, fecundity, and nonsynchrony in a natural fertility population. Current Anthropology, 38, 123–129.Google Scholar
Swaddle, J. P., & Cuthill, I. C. (1994). Preference for symmetric males by female zebra finches. Nature, 367, 165–166.Google Scholar
Symons, D. (1989). The psychology of human mate preferences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 34–35.Google Scholar
Taylor, T. (2010). The artificial ape: How technology changed the course of human evolution. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Tehrani, J., & Collard, M. (2002). Investigating cultural evolution through biological phylogenetic analyses of Turkmen textiles. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 21, 443–463.Google Scholar
Tennie, C., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Ratcheting up the ratchet: On the evolution of cumulative culture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 2405–2415.Google Scholar
Tennov, D. (1979). Love and limerence: The experience of being in love. Lanham, ML: Scarborough House.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. G., & Stewart-Williams, S. (2018). Mating strategy flexibility in the laboratory: Preferences for long- and short-term mating change in response to evolutionarily relevant variables. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39, 82–93.Google Scholar
Thomas, M. G., Ji, T., Wu, J., et al. (2018). Kinship underlies costly cooperation in Mosuo villages. Royal Society Open Science, 5, 171535.Google Scholar
Thornhill, R. (1976). Sexual selection and nuptial feeding behavior in Bittacus apicalis (Insecta: Mecoptera). American Naturalist, 110, 529–548.Google Scholar
Thornhill, R. (1992). Female preference for the pheromone of males with low fluctuating asymmetry in the Japanese scorpionfly (Panorpa japonica: Mecoptera). Behavioral Ecology, 3, 277–283.Google Scholar
Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1993). Human facial beauty: Averageness, symmetry, and parasite resistance. Human Nature, 4, 237–269.Google Scholar
Thornhill, R., (1994). Human fluctuating asymmetry and sexual behavior. Psychological Science, 5, 297–302.Google Scholar
Thornhill, R., Thornhill, R., & Palmer, C. T. (2000). A natural history of rape: Biological bases of sexual coercion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tidière, M., Gaillard, J.-M., Müller, D. W. H., et al. (2015). Does sexual selection shape sex differences in longevity and senescence patterns across vertebrates? A review and new insights from captive ruminants. Evolution, 69, 3123–3140.Google Scholar
Tiger, L., & Shepher, J. (1975). Women in the kibbutz. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Tishkoff, S. A., Reed, F. A., Ranciaro, A., et al. (2007). Convergent adaptation of human lactase persistence in Africa and Europe. Nature Genetics, 39, 31–40.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 19–136). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Touboul, J. (2014). The hipster effect: When anticonformists all look the same. arXiv, 1410.8001.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35–57.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B. (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man: 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago, IL: Aldine Press.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. L. (2002). Natural selection and social theory: Selected papers of Robert Trivers. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Turkheimer, E. (2000). Three laws of behavior genetics and what they mean. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 160–164.Google Scholar
Tybur, J. M., Miller, G. F., & Gangestad, S. W. (2007). Testing the controversy: An empirical examination of adaptationists’ attitudes towards politics and science. Human Nature, 18, 313–328.Google Scholar
Tylor, E. B. (1871). Primitive culture: Researches into the development of mythology, philosophy, religion, art and customs. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
van den Berghe, P. L. (1979). Human family systems: An evolutionary view. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Van Dongen, S., & Gangestad, S. W. (2011). Human fluctuating asymmetry in relation to health and quality: A meta-analysis. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32, 380–398.Google Scholar
van Schaik, C. P., Ancrenaz, M., Borgen, G., et al. (2003). Orangutan cultures and the evolution of material culture. Science, 299, 102–105.Google Scholar
van Veelen, M., García, J., Sabelis, M. W., & Egas, M. (2012). Group selection and inclusive fitness are not equivalent; the Price equation vs. models and statistics. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 299, 64–80.Google Scholar
Vasey, P. L., Pocock, D. S., & VanderLaan, D. P. (2007). Kin selection and male androphilia in Samoan fa’afafine. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 159–167.Google Scholar
Voelkl, B., Portugal, S. J., Unsöld, M., Usherwood, J. R., Wilson, A. M., & Fritz, J. (2015). Matching times of leading and following suggest cooperation through direct reciprocity during V-formation flight in ibis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 2115–2120.Google Scholar
Waitt, C., & Little, A. C. (2006). Preferences for symmetry in conspecific facial shape among Macaca mulatta. International Journal of Primatology, 27, 133–145.Google Scholar
Wallen, K. (2005). Hormonal influences on sexually differentiated behavior in nonhuman primates. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 26, 7–26.Google Scholar
Walpole, S. C., Prieto-Merino, D., Edwards, P., et al. (2012). The weight of nations: An estimation of adult human biomass. BMC Public Health, 12, 439.Google Scholar
Warraq, I. (2002). Virgins? What virgins? The Guardian. Retrieved March 30, 2015, from www.theguardian.com/books/2002/jan/12/books.guardianreview5Google Scholar
Washburn, S., & Lancaster, C. (1968). The evolution of hunting. In Lee, R. B. & DeVore, I. (Eds.), Man the hunter (pp. 193–303). Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Washburn, S. L. (1978). Human behavior and the behavior of other animals. American Psychologist, 33, 405–418.Google Scholar
West, S. A., Griffin, A. S., & Gardner, A. (2007a). Social semantics: Altruism, cooperation, mutualism, strong reciprocity and group selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 20, 415–432.Google Scholar
West, S. A., Griffin, A. S., & Gardner, A. (2007b). Social semantics: How useful has group selection been? Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21, 374–385.Google Scholar
Whitehead, H., & Rendell, L. (2014). The cultural lives of whales and dolphins. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Whiten, A., Goodall, J., McGrew, W. C., et al. (1999). Cultures in chimpanzees. Nature, 399, 682–685.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, G. S. (1984). Reciprocal food sharing in the vampire bat. Nature, 308, 181–184.Google Scholar
Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and natural selection: A critique of some current evolutionary thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. S. (2002). Darwin’s cathedral: Evolution, religion, and the nature of society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. S. (2015). Does altruism exist? Culture, genes, and the welfare of others. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. S., & Sober, E. (1994). Reintroducing group selection to the human behavioral sciences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 585–654.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. S., Wilson, D. S., & Wilson, E. O. (2007). Rethinking the theoretical foundation of sociobiology. Quarterly Review of Biology, 82, 327–348.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1985). Competitiveness, risk taking, and violence: The young male syndrome. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6, 59–73.Google Scholar
Wilson, M., (1992). The man who mistook his wife for a chattel. In Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 289–322). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. L., Boesch, C., Fruth, B., et al. (2014). Lethal aggression in Pan is better explained by adaptive strategies than human impacts. Nature, 513, 414–417.Google Scholar
Wingfield, J. C., Hegner, R. E., Dufty, A. M. J., & Ball, G. F. (1990). The “challenge hypothesis”: Theoretical implications for patterns of testosterone secretion, mating systems, and breeding strategies. American Naturalist, 136, 829–846.Google Scholar
Wolf, A. P. (1966). Childhood association, sexual attraction, and the incest taboo. American Anthropologist, 68, 883–898.Google Scholar
Wolf, A. P. (1970). Childhood association and sexual attraction: A further test of the Westermarck hypothesis. American Anthropologist, 72, 530–515.Google Scholar
Wolf, N. (1991). The beauty myth: How images of beauty are used against women. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699–727.Google Scholar
Wood, W., (2012). Biosocial construction of sex differences and similarities in behavior. In Olson, J. M. & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. XLVI (pp. 55–123). London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Woods, V. (2010). Bonobo handshake: A memoir of love and adventure in the Congo. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Workman, L., & Reader, W. (2014). Evolutionary psychology: An introduction (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, R. (1994). The moral animal: The new science of evolutionary psychology. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Wynne-Edwards, V. C. (1962). Animal dispersion in relation to social behaviour. Edinburgh, UK: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
Xue, M. (2013). Altruism and reciprocity among friends and kin in a Tibetan village. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34, 323–329.Google Scholar
Young, L., & Alexander, B. (2012). The chemistry between us: Love, sex, and the science of attraction. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Yudkowsky, E. S. (2006). The human importance of the intelligence explosion. Paper presented at the Singularity Summit 2006, Stanford, CA. Retrieved March 3, 2018, from www.scribd.com/document/2327576/The-Human-Importance-of-the-Intelligence-Explosion-Powperpoint-Presentation-HandoutGoogle Scholar
Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection: A selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53, 205–214.Google Scholar
Zahavi, A., & Zahavi, A. (1997). The handicap principle: A missing piece of Darwin’s puzzle. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, M., Silberman, J., & Hall, J. A. (2013). The relation between intelligence and religiosity: A meta-analysis and some proposed explanations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 325–354.Google Scholar
Zuk, M. (2013). Paleofantasy: What evolution really tells us about sex, diet, and how we live. New York: Norton.Google Scholar