Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T08:02:35.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1.1 - Cognitive Theories of Crime

from Part I - Psychological Underpinnings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2021

By
Clive R. Hollin
Edited by
Jennifer M. Brown  and
Miranda A. H. Horvath
Jennifer M. Brown
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Miranda A. H. Horvath
Affiliation:
University of Suffolk
Get access

Summary

The application of cognitive theories to criminal behaviour has moved through various stages. Sutherland’s Differential Association Theory (1930s/40s) introduced the notion of cognitions (definitions in the theory) as a factor in explaining crime. Following Skinner’s operant learning, Bandura’s social learning theory (1960s/70s) emphasised the role of cognition acquiring and maintaining behaviour, including criminal behaviour. In the 1980s social information processing articulated the sequence of encoding social cues, interpretation of cues, clarification of response goals, response access or construction, response decision and behavioural response. These cognitive processes may be affected by the individual’s emotional state, particularly anger in crimes of interpersonal violence. The 1980s also gave the view of the criminal as a rational decision-maker prepared to seize an opportunity to offend. The theories have given two contrasting approaches to crime reduction: (i) change offenders’ thinking and values; (ii) remove the opportunity for crime through situational crime prevention.

Keywords

Interpersonal CognitionRational Decision-MakingReducing CrimeSocial Learning TheorySocial Information Processing Theory
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Forensic Psychology , pp. 19 - 34
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akers, R. L. (1973). Deviant behavior: A social learning approach. Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Akhtar, N., & Bradley, E. J. (1991). Social information processing deficits of aggressive children: Present findings and implications for social skills training. Clinical Psychology Review, 11(5), 621–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, C. A., Berkowitz, L., Donnerstein, E., Huesmann, L. R., Johnson, J. D., Linz, D., Malamuth, N. M., & Wartella, E. (2003). The influence of media violence on youth. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 4(3), 81–110.Google Scholar
Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1995). LSI-R: The Level of Service Inventory–Revised. Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J. S. (2004). The Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (LS/CMI). Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
Antonowicz, D. H., & Ross, R. R. (2005). Social problem-solving deficits in offenders. In McMurran, M. & McGuire, J. (Eds.), Social problem solving and offending: evidence, evaluation and evolution. John Wiley & Sons, pp. 91–102.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bennett, T., Holloway, K., & Farrington, D. P. (2009). A review of the effectiveness of neighbourhood watch. Security Journal, 22(2), 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, R., & Hollin, C. R. (2009). Developing citizenship. EuroVista: Probation and Community Justice, 1(1), 24–31.Google Scholar
Burt, C. H. (2020). Self-control and crime: Beyond Gottfredson & Hirschi’s theory. Annual Review of Criminology, 3, 43–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. G. (Eds.). (1986). The reasoning criminal: rational choice perspectives on offending. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115(1), 74–101.Google Scholar
Feeney, F. (1986). Robbers as decision-makers. In Cornish, D. B. & Clarke, R. V. G. (Eds.), The reasoning criminal: rational choice perspectives on crime (pp. 53–71). Springer.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. J. (2015). Do angry birds make for angry children? A meta-analysis of video game influences on children’s and adolescents’ aggression, mental health, prosocial behavior, and academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(5), 646–666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freedman, B. J., Rosenthal, L., Donahoe, C. P., Schlundt, C. P., & McFall, R. M. (1978). A social-behavioral analysis of skill deficits in delinquent and nondelinquent adolescent boys. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46(6), 1448–1462.Google Scholar
Gaffney, L. R. (1984). A multiple-choice test to measure social skills in delinquent and nondelinquent adolescent girls. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52(5), 911–912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibbs, J. C. (1993). Moral-cognitive interventions. In Goldstein, A. P. & Huff, C. R. (Eds.), The gang intervention handbook (pp. 159–185). Research Press.Google Scholar
Glueck, S., & Glueck, E. (1950). Unraveling juvenile delinquency. Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Goldstein, A. P., Glick, B., & Gibbs, J. C. (1998). Aggression replacement training (2nd ed.). Research Press.Google Scholar
Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Greer, C., & Reiner, R. (2012). Mediated mayhem: Media, crime, criminal justice. In Maguire, M., Morgan, R., & Reiner, R. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminology (pp. 245–278). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guerette, R. T., & Bowers, K. J. (2009). Assessing the extent of crime displacement and diffusion of benefits: A review of situational crime prevention evaluations. Criminology, 47(4), 1331–1368.Google Scholar
Hatcher, R. M., Palmer, E. J., McGuire, J., Hounsome, J. C., Bilby, C. A. L., & Hollin, C. R. (2008). Aggression Replacement Training with adult male offenders within community settings: A reconviction analysis. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 19(4), 517–532.Google Scholar
Hollin, C. R. (2003). Aggression Replacement Training: Putting theory and research to work. Reclaiming Children and Youth: The Journal of Strength-Based Interventions, 12(3), 132–135.Google Scholar
Hollin, C. R., Palmer, E. J., & Clark, D. (2003). The Level of Service Inventory-Revised profile of English Prisoners: A needs analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30(4), 422–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollin, C. R., & Palmer, E. J. (2003). Level of Service Inventory–Revised profiles of violent and non-violent prisoners. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18(9), 1075–1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollin, C. R., & Palmer, E. J. (2006a). The adolescent problems inventory: A profile of incarcerated English male young offenders. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(7), 1485–1495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollin, C. R., & Palmer, E. J. (2006b). The Level of Service Inventory–Revised profile of English Prisoners: Risk and reconviction analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33(3), 347–366.Google Scholar
Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2004). Empathy and offending: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9(5), 441–476.Google Scholar
Jurkovic, G. J. (1980). The juvenile delinquent as moral philosopher. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 709–727.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, L. (1964). Development of moral character and moral ideology. In Hoffman, M. & Hoffman, L. (Eds.), Review of child development research (Vol. 1, pp. 381–343). Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, L. (1984). Essays on moral development: the psychology of moral development. Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Lilley, R. J., Cullen, F. T., & Ball, R. A. (2002). Criminological theory: context and consequences (3rd ed.). Sage.Google Scholar
Luckenbill, D. F. (1977). Criminal homicide as a situated transaction. Social Problems, 25(2), 176–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, J. (2006). General offending behaviour programmes: Concept, theory, and practice. In Hollin, C. R. & Palmer, E. J. (Eds.), Offending behaviour programmes: development, application, and controversies (pp. 69–111). John Wiley.Google Scholar
McLean, S. J., Worden, R. E., & Kim, M. (2013). Here’s looking at you: An evaluation of public CCTV cameras and their effects on crime and disorder. Criminal Justice Review, 38(3) 303–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMurran, M., & McGuire, J. (Eds.). (2005). Social problem solving and offending: evidence, evaluation and evolution. John Wiley.Google Scholar
Marshall, W. L., & Marshall, L. E. (2019). Empathy and sexual offending: Theory, research and practice. In O’Donohue, W. & Schewe, P. (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault and sexual assault prevention (pp. 229–239). Springer.Google Scholar
Mayhew, P., Clarke, R. V. G., Sturman, A., & Hough, J. M. (1976). Crime as Opportunity (Home Office Research Study No. 34). HMSO.Google Scholar
Miller, N., & Dollard, J. (1941). Social learning and imitation. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Nietzel, M. T. (1979). Crime and its modification: a social learning perspective. Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Novaco, R. W. (1975). Anger control: the development and evaluation of an experimental treatment. D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
Novaco, R. W. (2006). Anger dysregulation: Its assessment and treatment. In Cavell, T. A. & Malcolm, K. T. (Eds.), Anger, aggression, and interventions for interpersonal violence (pp. 3–54). Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Novaco, R. W., & Welsh, W. N. (1989). Anger disturbances: Cognitive mediation and clinical prescriptions. In Howells, K. & Hollin, C. R. (Eds.), Clinical approaches to violence (pp. 39–60). John Wiley.Google Scholar
Palmer, E. J. (2003). Offending behaviour: moral reasoning, criminal conduct and the rehabilitation of offenders. Willan.Google Scholar
Palmer, E. J., & Hollin, C. R. (2003). Using the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles with English prisoners. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 8(2), 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, E. J., & Hollin, C. R. (2004a). The use of the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles with English young offenders. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9(2), 253–263.Google Scholar
Palmer, E. J., & Hollin, C. R. (2004b). Predicting reconviction using the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles with English prisoners. Legal & Criminological Psychology, 9(1), 57–68.Google Scholar
Pearson, D. A., McDougall, C., Kanaan, M., Bowles, R. A., & Torgerson, D. J. (2011). Reducing criminal recidivism: evaluation of Citizenship, an evidence-based probation supervision process. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7(1), 73–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgement of the child. Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Piza, E, L. (2018). The crime prevention effect of CCTV in public places: A propensity score analysis. Journal of Crime and Justice, 41(1), 14–30.Google Scholar
Przybylski, A. K., & Weinstein, N. (2019). Violent video game engagement is not associated with adolescents’ aggressive behaviour: Evidence from a registered report. Royal Society Open Science, 6(2), 171474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiners, R. L. E. P., Corcoran, R., Drake, R., Shryane, N. M., & Völlum, B. A. (2011). The QCAE: A questionnaire of cognitive and affective empathy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(1), 84–95.Google Scholar
Reppetto, T. A. (1976). Crime prevention and the displacement phenomenon. Crime & Delinquency, 22(2), 166–177.Google Scholar
Rock, P. (2012). Sociological theories of crime. In Maguire, M., Morgan, R. & Reiner, R. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminology (pp. 39–80). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, R. R., & Fabiano, E. A. (1985). Time to think: a cognitive model of delinquency prevention and offender rehabilitation. Institute of Social Sciences and Arts.Google Scholar
Ross, R. R., Fabiano, E. A., & Ewles, C. D. (1988). Reasoning and rehabilitation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 32(1), 29–35.Google Scholar
Rotter, J. B. (1945). Social learning and clinical psychology. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviourism. Cape.Google Scholar
Sutherland, E. H. (1939). Principles of criminology. Lippincott.Google Scholar
Sutherland, E. H. (1947). Principles of criminology (4th ed.). Lippincott.Google Scholar
Sutherland, E. H., & Cressey, D. R. (1970). Principles of criminology (8th ed.). Lippincott.Google Scholar
Sutherland, E. H., & Cressey, D. R. (1974). Principles of criminology (9th ed.). Lippincott.Google Scholar
Sykes, G., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670.Google Scholar
Tong, L. S. J., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). How effective is the “Reasoning and Rehabilitation” programme in reducing re-offending? A meta-analysis of evaluations in four countries. Psychology, Crime and Law, 12(1), 3–24.Google Scholar
Walters, G. D. (1995a). The Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles. Part I: Reliability and preliminary validity. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 22(3), 307–325.Google Scholar
Walters, G. D. (1995b). The Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles. Part II: Identifying simulated response sets. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 22(4), 437–445.Google Scholar
Walters, G. G. (2002). The Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS): A review and meta-analysis. Assessment, 9(3), 278–291.Google Scholar
Walters, G. G. (2005). Incremental validity of the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles as a predictor of continuous and dichotomous measures of recidivism. Assessment, 12(1) 19–27.Google Scholar
Walters, G. G. (2019). Criminal thinking: Theory and practice. In Polaschek, D. L. L., Day, A., & Hollin, C. R. (Eds.), The Wiley international handbook of correctional psychology (pp. 637–653). Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Welsh, B. C., & Farrington, D. P. (2009). Public area CCTV and crime prevention: An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis. Justice Quarterly, 26(4), 716–745.Google Scholar
West, D. J., & Farrington, D. P. (1973). Who becomes delinquent? Heinemann Educational.Google Scholar
Wilcox, P., & Cullen, F. T. (2018). Situational opportunity theories of crime. Annual Review of Criminology, 1, 123–148.Google Scholar
Yochelson, S., & Samenow, S. E. (1976). The criminal personality, vol. 1: a profile for change. Jason Aronsen.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×