Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T13:59:27.831Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Manufacturing: The Cornerstone of a Planning Strategy for the 21st Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2020

Santosh Mehrotra
Affiliation:
Jawaharlal Nehru University
Sylvie Guichard
Affiliation:
Université de Genève
Get access

Summary

Although India's gross domestic product (GDP) growth rate since independence has consistently increased decade by decade, industry (including manufacturing, construction, and so on) accounts for only 25 per cent of GDP (in 1950, it was 8 per cent). The manufacturing sector contributed in 2017 only about 16 per cent in the GDP, stagnating since economic reforms began in 1991. By contrast, in some Asian economies, the share of industry has exceeded 30–40 per cent while that of manufacturing, 20–30 per cent. For example, Malaysia roughly tripled its share of manufacturing value-added in GDP from 1960 to 2014 to reach about 24 per cent, while Thailand's share increased from 13 per cent to 33 per cent over the same period (Mitra et al. 2017); Vietnam too has seen a sharp increase in recent decades. In India, manufacturing has never been the leading sector in the economy other than during the second and third plan periods, and certainly not since the economic reforms.

No major country in the world has managed to reduce poverty or sustain growth over long periods of time without the manufacturing sector becoming the lead sector, driving economic growth. This is because productivity levels in industry (and manufacturing) are much higher than in either agriculture or services, and it has historically proved to be the source of productivity gains across the primary and tertiary sectors, through the spread effects of technological change. Manufacturing is an engine of economic growth because in addition to higher productivity, the manufacturing sector offers greater opportunities for economies of scale, for embodying technological progress and generates forward and backward linkages that create positive spillover effects in the economy. The growth in services after manufacturing growth is very different in nature – it is in research and development (R&D) and high-end services – while without manufacturing, they are in low-end and fragile services. This is because manufacturing provides a strong technological base in the country. Not surprising that Rodrik (2011) has demonstrated that countries with larger manufacturing sectors grow faster.

Almost all organized sector industries saw accelerated growth of output and employment from 1991–1992 to 1995–1996 (with minerals and metals, machinery, automobiles, and chemicals and petrochemicals out-performing). However, this growth of organized manufacturing decelerated between 1996–1997 and 2001–2002.

Type
Chapter
Information
Planning in the 20th Century and Beyond
India's Planning Commission and the NITI Aayog
, pp. 208 - 243
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahluwalia, Montek S. 2002. ‘Economic Reforms in India since 1991: Has Gradualism Worked?Journal of Economic Perspectives 16 (3): 6788Google Scholar
Ahluwalia, Montek S. 2006. ‘India's Experience with Globalization.Australian Economic Review 39: 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altenburg, Tilman. 2011. ‘Industrial Policy in Developing Countries: Overview and Lessons from Seven Country Cases.’ Discussion Paper 4/2011, German Development Institute, Bonn.Google Scholar
Birdsall, Nancy M. et al. 1993. The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and Public Policy: Main Report (English). A World Bank policy research report. New York: Oxford University Press. Available at http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/975081468244550798/Main-report (accessed on 23 October 2019).Google Scholar
Chang, Ha-Joon, ed. 2003. Rethinking Development Economics. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
FICCI. 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018. Survey on Inverted Duty Structure in Indian Manufacturing. New Delhi: Mimeo.Google Scholar
Forbes, N. 2016. ‘India's National Innovation System: Transformed or Half-formed?’ Centre for Technology, Innovation and Economic Research, WP/2016/01. Mumbai.Google Scholar
Francis, Smitha. 2016. ‘Impact of Trade Liberalisation on the Indian Electronics Industry: Some Aspects of the Industrial Policy Dynamics of Global Value Chain Engagement.’ Institute for Study of Industrial Development, Working Paper 182, July.Google Scholar
Gupta, Vaibhav, Ganesan, Karthik, and Ghosh, Arunabha. 2016. Make in India: How Could We Be Strategic. New Delhi: Council on Energy, Environment and Water.Google Scholar
Hallward-Driemeier, Mary and Pritchett, Lant. 2015. ‘How Business Is Done in the Developing World: Deals Versus Rules.Journal of Economic Perspectives 29 (3): 121140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herstatt, C., Tiwari, R., Ernst, D., and Buse, S.. 2008. ‘India's National Innovation System: Key Corporate Perspectives.’ Working Paper, Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg.Google Scholar
Hoda, Anwarul and Rai, D. K.. 2014. ‘Trade and Investment Barriers affecting International Production Networks in India.’ ICRIER Working Paper 281, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Kumar, S. Vijay and Ganeshan, Swati. 2015. ‘Moving Forward with a World Class Mineral Policy for National Mineral Security.’ Discussion Paper, June, The Energy and Resources Institute, India.Google Scholar
Lall, Sanjaya. 1996. Learning from the Asian Tigers: Studies in Technology and Industrial Policy. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press Ltd.Google Scholar
Lee, Jong-Wha and Mehrotra, S.. 2017. Human Capital Development in South Asia: Problems and Prospects. Manila: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
Maira, Arun. 2015. An Upstart in Government. New Delhi: Rupa Publications.Google Scholar
Mani, S. and Nabar, J.. 2016. ‘Is the Indian Government Justified in Lowering Tax Incentives for R&D Expenditure of Firms?Economic and Political Weekly 2 (30).Google Scholar
McKinsey Global Institute. 2014. From Poverty to Empowerment: India's Imperative for Jobs, Growth, and Effective Basic Service. Mumbai: Mckinsey and Company.Google Scholar
Mehrotra, Santosh. 1990. India and the Soviet Union. Trade and Technology Transfer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mehrotra, Santosh. 2014. India's Skills Challenge: Reforming Vocational Education and Training to Harness the Demographic Dividend. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mehrotra, Santosh. 2016. Seizing the Demographic Dividend. Policies to Achieve Inclusive Growth in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mehrotra, Santosh and Parida, Jajati. 2018. Employment and Skills in India, 2004–2016. An Examination of Three States of the East Coast Economic Corridor. Manila: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
Mehrotra, S. and Biggeri, M., eds. 2007. ‘Asian Informal Workers: Global Risks, Local Protection.London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mehrotra, S. and Acharya, S.. 2017. ‘Planning for Human Development—Experiences in Asia.Theoretical Economics Letters 7: 16071631.Google Scholar
Mehrotra, S. and Giri, T.. 2020. ‘India's Enterprise Structure: Not Just the Middle Is Missing.’ In India's Small Enterprises: The Era of Transition, ed. Matthews, P. M.. Bangalore.Google Scholar
Mehrotra, S., Parida, J., Gandhi, A., and Sinha, S.. 2014. ‘Explaining Employment Trends in India 1993 to 2012.Economic and Political Weekly 49 (32): 4957.Google Scholar
Mohanty, M. 2013. ‘Growth and Globalization: An Anatomy of the Slowdown of the Indian Economy.’ Paper presented at IIM Kolkata, March.Google Scholar
Ministry of Finance. 2018. Economic Survey. New Delhi: Government of India.Google Scholar
Ministry of Mines. 2008. National Mineral Policy, 2008. New Delhi: Government of India.Google Scholar
Ministry of Mines and FICCI. 2013. Development of Indian Mining Industry: The Way Forward. New Delhi: FICCI and Metals and Mines Division, Government of India.Google Scholar
Mitra, Sabyasachi, Hasan, Rana, Sharma, Manoj, Jeong, Hoe Yun, and Guha, A.. 2017. Scaling New Heights: Vizag–Chennai Industrial Corridor India's First Coastal Corridor. Manila: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
MSDE (Ministry of Skill Development & Entrepreneurship). 2016. A Review of Sector Skills Councils and India's Skills Ecosystem. Report of an Expert Group (chaired by Sharda Prasad). New Delhi: Government of India.Google Scholar
Nagaraj, R. 2019. ‘Make in India: Why the Lion Did Not Roar.’ India Policy Forum, 3 April.Google Scholar
Nolan, Peter. 2003. China at the Crossroads. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Panagariya, Arvind. 2008. India: The Emerging Giant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pant, Manoj. 2017. ‘Indian Industry and Inverted Duty Structure: An Analysis.Indian Institute of Foreign Trade, New Delhi, mimeo.Google Scholar
Pathania, K.. 2017. ‘Empirical Estimates of Inverted Duty Structure in Indian Manufacturing.’ Institute for the Study of Industrial Development, conference on Economic Growth and Industry, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Peres, Wilson and Primi, Annalisa. 2009. ‘Theory and Practice of Industrial Policy: Evidence from the Latin American Experience.’ CEPAL Desarrollo Productivo Serie 187. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.Google Scholar
Planning Commission. 2013. The 12th Five Year Plan. Faster, More Inclusive and Sustainable Growth. New Delhi: Government of India.Google Scholar
Prakash, Arun. 2018. ‘Note Made in India.’ Indian Express, 31 January.Google Scholar
RBI. 2015. Report of the Committee Set Up to Examine the Financial Architecture of MSMEs, Reserve Bank of India. Mumbai: Reserve Bank of India.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 2002. Institutions, Integration and Geography: In Search of the Deep Determinants of Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 2011. ‘Unconditional Convergence.’ CEPR Discussion Paper 8631, November.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 2016. ‘Premature Deindustrialization.Journal of Economic Growth 21: 133.Google Scholar
Shankar, Ajay. 2018. ‘Leveraging Procurement for Make in India.’ Business Standard, 2 October.Google Scholar
Singh, Harshavardhana. 2017. ‘Trade Policy Reform in India since 1991’. Brookings India Working Paper 2, March, New Delhi.Google Scholar
SIPRI. 2018. World Arms Imports and Exports. Stockholm: The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph and Greenwald, Bruce. 2014. Creating a Learning Society. A New Approach: Growth, Development and Social Progress. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Subramanian, Arvind and Verma, Rashmi. 2016. ‘Stitching up Employment.’ The Indian Express, 23 June.Google Scholar
Thomas, Jayan Jose. 2019. ‘How to Revive Indian Manufacturing? On the Need for Industrial Policy’. In State of Working India, 2019, ed. Basole, Amit, 110130. Bengaluru: Centre for Sustainable Employment.Google Scholar
UNCTAD. 2018. World Investment Report, 2018: Investment and New Industrial Policies. Geneva: United Nations Publication.Google Scholar
Veeramani, C. 2012. ‘Anatomy of India's Merchandise Export Growth, 1993-4 and 2010–11.Economic and Political Weekly 47 (1): 94104.Google Scholar
Wade, Robert. 2012. ‘Return of Industrial Policy?International Review of Applied Economics 26 (2): 223239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. 2018. The Indian Economy: A Mid year Update. New Delhi: World Bank.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×