Book contents
- The Making of Modern Property
- The Making of Modern Property
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 What Roman Antiquity Had to Offer
- 2 The Foundations of Romanist-Bourgeois Property
- 3 Crafting Romanist-Bourgeois Property
- 4 Reform, Not Revolution
- 5 The Tensions of Absolute Property
- 6 Roman Dominium in the Republics of Latin America
- 7 The Social Critics
- Conclusions
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 July 2023
Book contents
- The Making of Modern Property
- The Making of Modern Property
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 What Roman Antiquity Had to Offer
- 2 The Foundations of Romanist-Bourgeois Property
- 3 Crafting Romanist-Bourgeois Property
- 4 Reform, Not Revolution
- 5 The Tensions of Absolute Property
- 6 Roman Dominium in the Republics of Latin America
- 7 The Social Critics
- Conclusions
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Making of Modern PropertyReinventing Roman Law in Europe and its Peripheries 1789–1950, pp. 327 - 354Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Abel, Wilhelm, Geschichte der deutschen Landwirtschaft vom frühen Mittelalter bis zum 19. Jahrhundert (Stuttgart: Verlag Eugen Ulmer, 1962).Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio, “Introduction,” in Spano, Michele (ed.). Il valore delle cose (Macerata: Quodlibet, 2015).Google Scholar
Akkermans, Bram, “The Numerus Clausus of Property Rights,” in Graziadei, Michele and Smith, Lionel (eds.), Comparative Property Law: Global Perspectives (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2017), 8–12.Google Scholar
Albano, Manuel Carrasco, Comentarios sobre la Constitucion Politica de 1833, 2nd ed. (Santiago: Imprenta de la Libraria del Mercurio, 1874).Google Scholar
Alexander, Gregory S., “Pluralism and Property” (2011) 80 Fordham Law Review 1017–1052.Google Scholar
Alexander, Gregory S., Property and Human Flourishing (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Alexander, Gregory S., “The Social Obligation Norm in American Property Law” (2009) 94(4) Cornell Law Review 745–819.Google Scholar
Alibrandi, Ilario, Teoria del Possesso Secondo il Diritto Romano (Rome: G. Aurelj, 1871).Google Scholar
Amunátegui, Miguel Luis, Introducción: Proyecto Inedito del Código Civil, Opuscolos Científicos, in Obras Completas de Don Andrés Bello, vol. 13 (Santiago: Imprenta Ramirez, 1890).Google Scholar
Ando, Clifford, Imperial Ideology and Provincial Loyalty in the Roman Empire (Berkeley: University California Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Anguita, Leopoldo Urrutia, “Vulgarización sobre la posesión ante el Código Civil chileno” (1934) 31(1–2) Revista de derecho y jurisprudencia 5–13.Google Scholar
Anon., (A Barrister of the Inner Temple), The Code Napoleon; or, the French Civil Code (London: William Benning, 1827).Google Scholar
Appiani, , Bellorum civilium, Gabba, Emilio (ed.) (Firenze: La “Nuova Italia” Editrice 1958).Google Scholar
Arias, Gino, “La Proprietà Privata nel Diritto Fascista” (1935) 6(5) Lo Stato: Lo Stato Rivista di Scienze Politiche e Giuridiche 332–335.Google Scholar
Arnaud, André-Jean, Les juristes Face à la société du XIXe siècle à nos jours (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1975).Google Scholar
Arnaud, André-Jean, Les Origines Doctrinales du Code Civil Français (Paris: Librairie Générale de Droit et Jurisprudence, 1969).Google Scholar
Arndts, Karl Ludwig, Lehrbuch der Pandekten, vol. 1 (Munich: Cotta’sche Buchhandlung, 1865).Google Scholar
Arndts, Karl Ludwig, Lehrbuch der Pandekten, vol. 4 (Munich: J. G. Cotta’sche Buchhandlung, 1861).Google Scholar
Arndts, Lodovico, Trattato delle Pandette, Filippo Serafini (trans.) (Bologna: Tipi Fava & Gragnani, 1872).Google Scholar
Atkins, Jed W., Roman Political Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Atria, Fernando, “Derechos Reales” (2005) 2 Revista de Derecho de la Universidad Adolfo Ibañez 29–105.Google Scholar
Atria, Fernando, “El sistema de acciones reales, parte especial: la acción de precario” (2017) 30 Revista derecho Valdivia 57– 86.Google Scholar
Audren, Frédéric, and Fillon, Catherine, “Louis Josserand ou la construction d’une autorité doctrinale” (2009) 1 Revue trimestrielle de droit civil 39–76.Google Scholar
Audren, Frédéric, and Halpérin, Jean Louis, La Culture Juridique Française: Entre Mythes et Realités, XIX–XX Siècles (Paris: CNRS Éditions, 2013).Google Scholar
Backhaus, Jürgen Georg, Physiocracy, Antiphysiocracy and Pfeiffer (New York: Springer-Verlag, 2011).Google Scholar
Badian, Ernst, “Tiberius Gracchus and the Beginning of the Roman Revolution” (1972) 1 Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 668–731.Google Scholar
Baillon-Passe, Christian, “Réponse à Jean-Pascal Chazal: mission accomplie, on va relire Josserand” (2003) 32 Dalloz 2190–2191.Google Scholar
Barnave, Joseph, Oeuvres Posthumes. Introduction à la Révolution Française (Paris: Bérenger, 1842).Google Scholar
Barros, Lauro, Ensayo sobre la condición de las clases rurales en Chile. Memoria presentada al Concurso de la Exposición Internacional de 1875 (Santiago: Imprenta Agricola de Enrique Ahrens, 1875).Google Scholar
Bayly, Christopher A., The Birth of the Modern World 1780–1914 (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2004).Google Scholar
Bechor, Guy, The Sanhuri Code and the Emergence of Modern Arab Civil Law (1932 to 1949) (Leiden: Brill, 2008).Google Scholar
Belime, William, Traité du droit de possession et des actions possessoires (Paris: Joubert, 1842).Google Scholar
Bell, Abraham, and Parchomovsky, Gideon, “Reconfiguring Property in Three Dimensions” (2008) 75 University of Chicago Law Review 1015–1070.Google Scholar
Bell, Sinclair W., and Plessis, Paul Du (eds.), Roman Law before the Twelve Tables: An Interdisciplinary Approach (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Belleau, Marie Claire, “Les Juristes Inquiets” (1999) 40 Les Cahiers de Droit 507–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bello, Don Andrés, “La Agricultura de la Zona Tórrida (1826), Poesias,” in Obras Completas de Don Andrés Bello, vol. 3 (Santiago: Imprenta Ramirez, 1883).Google Scholar
Bello, Don Andrés, “Latín y Derecho Romano, Opuscolos Literarios,” in Obras Completas de Don Andrés Bello, vol. 8 (Santiago: Imprenta Ramirez, 1885).Google Scholar
Bello, Don Andrés, “Proemio del Derecho Romano, Opuscolos Jurídicos,” in Obras Completas de Don Andrés Bello, vol. 9 (Santiago: Imprenta Ramirez, 1885).Google Scholar
Bello, Don Andrés, “Proyecto de Código Civil,” in Obras Completas de Don Andrés Bello, vol. 12 (Santiago: Imprenta Ramirez, 1887).Google Scholar
Bello, Don Andrés, “Temas de Historia y Geografia,” in Obras Completas de Andrés Bello, vol. 23 (Caracas: Fundación La Casa de Bello, 1981).Google Scholar
Belviso, Jacobus de, Apparatus in Usus & Consuetudines Feudorum (Heidelberg: Hans Kohl, 1559).Google Scholar
Berman, Marshall, All That Is Solid Melts into Air: The Experience of Modernity (New York: Penguin, 1982).Google Scholar
Beseler, Georg, System Des Gemeinen Deutschen Privatrechts, 4th ed. (Berlin: Weidmann, 1885).Google Scholar
Besnier, Bernard, “La conception stoïcienne de la matière” 2003 (1) Revue de métaphysique et de morale 51–64.Google Scholar
Bilbao, Fransico, “Revolución,” in Obras Completas de Francisco Bilbao, vol. 1 (Buenos Aires: Imprenta de Buenos Aires, 1865), 7–42.Google Scholar
Birks, Peter, and Nicholas, Barry (eds.), New Perspectives in the Roman Law of Property: Essays for Barry Nicholas (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Blaufarb, Rafe, The Great Demarcation: The French Revolution and the Invention of Modern Property (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleicken, Jochen “‘In provinciali solo dominium populi Romani est vel Caesaris.’ Zur Kolonisationspolitik der ausgehenden Republik und frühen Kaiserzeit” (1974) 4 Chiron 359–414.Google Scholar
Bois, Guy, La Mutation de l’An Mil: Lournand, Village Mâconnais de l’Antiquité au Féodalisme (Paris: Fayard, 1994).Google Scholar
Bonfante, Pietro, Corso di Diritto Romano: La Proprietà, vol. 2 (Milan: Giuffrè, 1968) [reprint].Google Scholar
Bonfante, Pietro, Corso di diritto romano: Diritti Reali, vol. 3 (Milan: Giuffrè, 1972) [reprint].Google Scholar
Bonfante, Pietro, Istituzioni di diritto romano, 10th ed. (Turin: Giappichelli, 1946).Google Scholar
Bonfante, Pietro, “La Catalogne du Milieu du Xe à la fin du XIe Siècle: Croissance et Mutations d’une Société” (1982) 98 Cahier de Civilisation Médiévale 143–147.Google Scholar
Bonfante, Pietro, Scritti giuridici varii: Proprietà e servitù, vol. 2 (Turin: UTET, 1918).Google Scholar
Bonnecase, Julien, L’École de l’Exégèse en Droit Civil: Les Traits Distinctifs de sa Doctrine et de ses Méthodes d’Après la Profession de Foi de ses Plus Illustres Représentants (Paris: E. de Boccard, 1924).Google Scholar
Bonnecase, Julien, Science du droit et romantisme: le conflit des conceptions juridiques en France de 1880 à l’heure actuelle (Paris: Librairie du Recueil Sirey, 1928)Google Scholar
Bourde, Andre J., Agronomie et Agronomes en France au XVIIIe Siècle (Paris: SEVPEN, 1967).Google Scholar
Bourde, Andre J., The Influence of England on the French Agronomists, 1750–1789 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1953).Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, Homo Academicus, Peter Collier (trans.) (Standford: Stanford University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Bowen, Edwin W., “The Relief Problem of Ancient Rome” (1942) 37 The Classical Journal 407–420.Google Scholar
Bowman, Alan, and Wilson, Andrew (eds.), Quantifying the Roman Economy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Brenner, Robert, “Agrarian Class Structure and Economic Development in Pre-Industrial Europe” (1976) 70(1) Past & Present 30.Google Scholar
Brenner, Robert, “The Agrarian Roots of European Capitalism” (1982) 97(1) Past & Present 16.Google Scholar
Brenner, Robert, “The Agrarian Roots of European Capitalism,” in Aston, Trevor H. and Philpin, C. H. E. (eds.), The Brenner Debate: Agrarian Class Structure and Economic Development in Pre-Industrial Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), 10–63.Google Scholar
Brenner, Robert, “Bourgeois Revolution and Transition to Capitalism,” in Beier, A. L. et al. (eds.), The First Modern Society: Essays in English History in Honour of Lawrence Stone (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), 271–304.Google Scholar
Brett, Annabel, “Individual and Community in the ‘Second Scholastic’: Subjective Rights in Domingo de Soto and Francisco Suárez,” in Blackwell, Constance and Kusukawa, Sachiko (eds.), Philosophy in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries: Conversations with Aristotle (London: Routledge, 1999), 146–168.Google Scholar
Brissot, Jacques-Pierre, Un indépendant à l’ordre des Avocats: sur la décadence du barreau en France (Berlin: 1781).Google Scholar
Bruns, Carl Georg, Das Recht des Besitzes im Mittelalter und in der Gegenwart, vol. 1 (Tübingen: H. Laupp’schen Buchhandlung, 1848).Google Scholar
Brutti, Massimo, Vittorio Scialoja, Emilio Betti: Due Visioni del Diritto Civile (Turin: Giappichelli, 2013).Google Scholar
Buckland, William W., and McNair, Arnold D., Roman Law and Common Law: A Comparison in Outline, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965).Google Scholar
Burns, Robert P., “Blackstone’s Theory of the ‘Absolute’ Rights of Property” (1985) 54 University of Cincinnati Law Review 67–86.Google Scholar
Butler, Eliza Mariab, The Tyranny of Greece over Germany: A Study of the Influence Exercised by Greek Art and Poetry over the Great Writers of the Eighteenth, Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1935).Google Scholar
Byers, Michael, “Abuse of Rights: An Old Principle, A New Age” (2002) 47 McGill Law Journal 389–434.Google Scholar
Cabanis, André, “Le Courant Néo-Monarchiste sous le Consulat” in Tulard, J. (ed.), in La Contre-Révolution. Origines, histoire, postérité (Paris: Perrin, 1990), 313–324.Google Scholar
Cabrera, Luis, Luis Cabrera: Bibiliografía: Aspectos de su Vida, Paginas Escogidas, Cabrera, Mercedes (ed.) (Mexico: Cultura, 1951).Google Scholar
Cabrera, Luis, “La reconstitución de los ejidos de los pueblos como medio de suprimir la esclavitud de los jornalero mexicano,” in Obras Completas, vol. 1 (Mexico: Ediciones Oasis, 1972).Google Scholar
Cabrera, Luis, “Los Bienes y la Propiedad Conforme al Nuevo Codido Civil,” in Obras Completas, vol. 1 (Mexico: Ediciones Oasis 1972), 258–321.Google Scholar
Cahan, Jean Axelrad, “The Concept of Property in Marx’s Theory of History: A Defense of the Autonomy of the Socio-economic Base” (1994) 58(4) Science & Society 392–414.Google Scholar
Caldera, Hugo D., “La Garantía Constitucional del Derecho de Propiedad y la Expropiación” (1979) 6(1/4) Revista Chilena De Derecho 312–335.Google Scholar
Camara de Diputados, “Sesión 43 Ordinaria, 9/1/1864,” in Sesiones de Congreso Nacional 1864 [Chile].Google Scholar
Capdequi, José Maria Ots, España en América, 2nd ed. (Bogota: Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 1952).Google Scholar
Capogrossi Colognesi, Luigi, “Alcuni problemi di storia romana arcaica: ‘ager publicus,’ ‘gentes’ e client,” (1980) 22 Bullettino dell’Istituto di Diritto Romano “Vittorio Scialoja” 29–65.Google Scholar
Capogrossi Colognesi, Luigi, “Ager publicus e ager privatus dall’età arcaica al compromesso patrizio-plebeo,” in Roset, Jaime (ed.), Estudios en homenaje al Profesor Juan Iglesias, vol. 2 (Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 1988), 639–650.Google Scholar
Capogrossi Colognesi, Luigi, Law and Power in the Making of the Roman Commonwealth, Laura Copp (trans.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Capogrossi Colognesi, Luigi, “Proprietà,” Enciclopedia del diritto 160–225, vol. 37 (Milan: Giuffrè, 1988).Google Scholar
Carbonnier, Jean, Flexible droit: Pour une sociologie du droit sans rigueur, 10th ed. (Paris: LGDJ, 2001).Google Scholar
Carcaterra, Antonio, Le definizioni dei giuristi romani: metodo, mezzi e fini (Naples: Jovene, 1966).Google Scholar
Carcaterra, Antonio, [Bruno Schmidlin], “Horoi, pithana und regulae – Zum Einkluß der Rhetorik und Dialektik auf die juristische Regelbildung,” in Temporini, Hildegard (ed.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, vol. 15 Recht (Methoden; Schulen: Einzelne Juristen, 1976), 101–130.Google Scholar
Carcopino, Jérôme, Autour des Gracques: Etudes Critiques (Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1967).Google Scholar
Cazzetta, Giovanni “Abuso del diritto e forma di unità del guiridico” (2017) 58 Rivista di Diritto Civile 559–581.Google Scholar
Centeno, Miguel A., and Ferraro, Agustin E., “Republics of the Possible: State Building in Latin America and Spain,” in Centeno, Miguel A. and Ferraro, Agustin E. (eds.), State and Nation Making in Latin America and Spain: Republics of the Possible (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 3–24.Google Scholar
Chacón, Jacinto, Exposición Razonada y Estudio Comparativo del Código Civil Chileno, vol. 2 (Valaparaiso: Imprenta de Mercurio 1878).Google Scholar
Chaimowicz, Thomas, Antiquity as the Source of Modernity: Freedom and Balance in the Thought of Montesquieu and Burke (Piscataway, NJ: Routledge, 2008).Google Scholar
Chazal, Jean-Pascal, “Relire Josserand’, oui mais … sans le trahir!” (2003) 27 Recueil Dalloz Sirey de doctrine de jurisprudence et de législation 1777–1781.Google Scholar
Christman, John, The Myth of Property: Toward an Egalitarian Theory of Ownership (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Cicero, . Brutus. Orator, G. L. Hendrickson (trans.) Loeb Classical Library 342 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1939).Google Scholar
Cicero, . De Domo Sua, N. H. Watts (trans.) Leob Classical Library 158 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1923).Google Scholar
Cicero, De Finibus H. Rackham (trans.) Loeb Classical Library 40 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1931).Google Scholar
Cicero, . De Lege Agraria, J. F. Freese (trans.) Loeb Classical Library 240 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1930).Google Scholar
Cicero, . De Officiis, Walter Miller (trans.) Loeb Classical Library 30 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1913).Google Scholar
Cicero, . De Oratore, E. W. Sutton (trans.) Loeb Classical Library 348 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1942).Google Scholar
Cicero, . Topica, H. M. Hubbell (trans.) Loeb Classical Library 386 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1949).Google Scholar
Cicero, . Tusculanae Disputationes, J. E. King (trans.) Loeb Classical Library 141 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1927).Google Scholar
Cimbali, Enrico, La nouva fase del diritto civile nei rapporti economici e sociali con proposte di reforma della legislazione civile vigente, 3rd ed. (Turin: Unione Tipografico-Editrice, 1885).Google Scholar
Codex Justinianus, Paulus, Krueger et al. (eds.), Corpus Iuris Civis (Berolina: Apud Weidmannos, 1900).Google Scholar
Codice per lo Regno delle Due Sicilie (Napoli: dalla stamperia reale della Real tip. del Ministero di Stato della cancelleria generale, 1854).Google Scholar
Cohen, Felix S., “The Pragmatic Meaning of Private Property Dialogue on Private Property” (1954) 9 Rutgers University Law Review 357–387.Google Scholar
Conte, Emanuele, “Framing the Feudal Bond” (2012) 80 Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 481–495.Google Scholar
Conte, Emanuele, “Modena 1182, the Origins of a New Paradigm of Ownership: The Interface between Historical Contingency and Scholarly Invention of Legal Categories” (2018) 15 Glossae European Journal of Legal History 5–19.Google Scholar
Conte, Emanuele, “Pillio da Medicina,” in Birocchi, Italo, Cortese, Ennio, Mattone, Antonello, and Milletti, Marco Nicola (eds.), Dizionario Biografico dei Giuristi Italiani (XII–XX secolo), vol. 2 (Bologna: Il Mulino, 2013) 531–536.Google Scholar
Conze, Werner, “Nation und Gesellschaft – Zwei Grundbegriffe der revolutionären Epoche,” in 198 Historische Zeitschrift (Oldenburg: Walter De Gruyter & Co, 1964), 1–43.Google Scholar
Cornell, Tim J., The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000–264 BC) (London: Routledge, 1995).Google Scholar
Corradini, , Domenico Garantismo e statualismo: Le codificazioni civilistiche dell’Ottocento, 3rd ed. (Milan: Giuffrè, 1986).Google Scholar
Cortese, Ennio (ed.), La proprietà e le proprietà: Pontignano, 30 settembre – 3 ottobre 1985 (Milan: Giuffrè, 1988).Google Scholar
Council of Europe, Colloquy on European Law, “Abuse of Rights and Equivalent Concepts: The Principle and Its Present Day Application,” in Proceedings of the Nineteenth Colloquy on European Law, Luxembourg, 6–9 November 1989 (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 1990), 1–180.Google Scholar
Cruz, Feliú Guillermo, La Abolicion de la Esclavitud en Chile, 2nd ed. (Santiago: Editorial Universitaria, 1973).Google Scholar
Cuche, Paul, A la recherche du fondement du droit: y a-t-il un romantisme juridique? Extrait de la Revue trimestrielle de droit civil 2 (Paris: Librairie du Recueil Sirey, 1929).Google Scholar
Dagan, Hanoch, “Markets for Self-Authorship” (2018) 27 Cornell Journal of Law & Public Policy 577–600.Google Scholar
Dagan, Hanoch “The Real Legacy of American Legal Realism” (2018) 38 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 123.Google Scholar
Dann, Otto, “Gleichheit und Gleichberechtigung, ” in Brunner, Otto, Conze, Werner, and Koselleck, Reinhart (eds.), Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe: Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland, vol. 2 (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1972), 1006–1026.Google Scholar
Davidson, Nestor M., “Standardization and Pluralism in Property Law” (2008) 61 Vanderbilt Law Review 1597–1666.Google Scholar
De Cecco, Marcello, “The Economy from Liberalism to Fascism,” in Lyttelton, Adrian (ed.), Liberal and Fascist Italy, 1900–1945 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), 62–73.Google Scholar
De Grand, Alexander J., Italian Fascism: Its Origins and Development, 3rd ed. (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Delalleau, Charles, Traité de l’expropriation pour cause d’utilité publique, vol. 1 (Paris: Cosse, Marchal et Compagnie, 1866).Google Scholar
Demolombe, Charles, Cours de Code Napoléon: Traité de la Distinction des Biens, de la Propriété, de l’Usufruit, de l’Usage et de l’Habitation, 2nd ed., 2 vols. (Paris: Durand, 1861).Google Scholar
Deroussin, David, “Josserand, Le Code Civil et le Code Libanais des obligations et contrats,” in Le Code civil français et le dialogue des cultures juridiques (Paris: Bruylant, 2007), 49–94.Google Scholar
de Saxoferrato, Bartolus, In Primam Digesti Novi Partem Commentaria (Torino: Augustae Taurinorum, 1589).Google Scholar
D’Isernia, Andrea, Libellus omnium legum allegatarum per Andream de Isernia in vsibus feudorum (Venice, 1576).Google Scholar
Dominguez, Ramón, Nuestro Sistema de Inquilinaje (Santiago: Imprenta del Correo, 1867).Google Scholar
Donahue, Charles, “Private Law Without the State and During Its Formation” (2008) 56(3) The American Journal of Comparative Law 541–566.Google Scholar
Donahue, Charles Jr., “Ius in the Subjective Sense in Roman Law: Reflections on Villey and Tierney,” in Maffei, Domenico, Birocchi, Italo, Caravale, Mario, Conte, Emanuele, and Petronio, Ugo (eds.), A Ennio Cortese, vol. 1 (Rome: Il Cigno Edizioni, 2001), 506–535.Google Scholar
dos Santos Chuna, Alexandre, “The Social Function of Property in Brazilian Law” (2011) 80
Fordham Law Review 1171–1182.Google Scholar
Dross, M. William, and Favario, Thierry (eds.), Un ordre juridique nouveau? Dialogues avec Louis Josserand (Paris: Mare & Martin, 2014).Google Scholar
Duby, Georges, La Société aux XIe et XIIe Siècles dans la Région Mâconnaise (Paris: Ed. de l’Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, 1989).Google Scholar
Duguit, Léon, “Changes of Principle in the Field of Liberty, Contract, Liability and Property,” in The Progress of Continental Law in the Nineteenth Century, The Continental Legal History Series, vol. 11 (Boston: Little, Brown, and Company, 1918), 65–146.Google Scholar
Duguit, Léon, Le droit social, le droit individuel et la transformation de l’État: conférences faites à l’École des hautes études sociale (Paris: F. Alcan, 1908).Google Scholar
Duguit, Léon, Les Transformations Generals du Droit Prive Depuis le Code Napoleon (Paris: Librarie Felix Alcan, 1912).Google Scholar
Dumas-Lavenac, Sophie, “Le Droit selon Louis Josserand” (2015) 2 Revue juridique de l’Ouest 39–53.Google Scholar
Dupin, Andre Marie Jean Jacques, Dissertation sur la Vie et les Ouvrages de Pothier (Paris: Béchet Aîné, 1825).Google Scholar
Duscio, Francesco, and Vecchio, Vincenzo, Dell’enfiteusi, o commentario del tit. 9 nel libro 3 delle Leggi per lo Regno delle Due Sicilie, vol. 1 (Catania: Pietro Giuntini, 1852).Google Scholar
Eberle, Lisa Pilar, “Law, Empire, and the Making of Roman Estates in the Provinces during the Late Republic” (2016) 3(1) Critical Analysis of Law 50–69.Google Scholar
Edict den erleichterten Besitz und den freien Gebrauch des Grundeigentums so wie die persönlichen Verhältnisse der Land-Bewohner betreffend (Memel: Königreich Preußen, 1807).Google Scholar
Egana, Juan, Memoria Sobre Los Mayorazgos de Chile (Santiago: Imprenta de R. Rengifo, 1828).Google Scholar
Fabres, José Clemente, Instituciones de derecho civil chileno, vol. 1 (Valparaíso: Imprenta del Universo, 1863).Google Scholar
Feenstra, Robert, Fata Iuris Romani, Études d’Histoire du Droit (Leyde: Presses Universitaires de Leyde, 1974).Google Scholar
Fenet, Pierre-Antoine (ed.), Recueil complet des travaux préparatoires du Code civil, 15 vols. (Paris: Videcoq, 1836).Google Scholar
Fenouillet, Dominique, “Étienne Louis Josserand (1868–1941)” (1996) 17 Revue d’histoire des Facultés de droit et de la science juridique 27–46.Google Scholar
Filangieri, Gaetano, Scienza della Legislazione, vol. 2 (Milan: Società Tipografica de’ Classici Italiani, 1822).Google Scholar
Finley, Moses I., The Ancient Economy (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Finley, Moses I., (ed.), Studies in Roman Property (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Flower, Harriet I., Roman Republics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Foster, Sheila R., and Bonilla, Daniel, “The Social Function of Property: A Comparative Perspective” (2011) 80 Fordham Law Review 1003–1015.Google Scholar
Fox-Genovese, Elizabeth, The Origins of Physiocracy (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Frank, Andre Gunder, Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America: Historical Studies of Chile and Brazil (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1967).Google Scholar
Frémont, Auguste-Federic-Mathilde, Recherches Historiques et Biographiques sur Pothier: Publiées à l’Occasion de l’Érection de sa Statue (Orleans: Gatineau, 1859).Google Scholar
Frier, Bruce W., The Rise of the Roman Jurists: Studies in Cicero’s Pro Caecina (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985)Google Scholar
Frontinus, Sextus Julius, De Aquis Urbis Romae, Rogers, H. R. (ed.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004).Google Scholar
Gagliardo, John G., From Pariah to Patriot: The Changing Image of the German Peasant (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1969).Google Scholar
Gaius, , Institutiones or Institutes of Roman Law, Edward Poste (trans.) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1904).Google Scholar
Gallo, Filippo, Studi sulla distinzione fra “res mancipi” e “res nec mancipi” (Turin: G. Giappichelli, 1958).Google Scholar
Gamauf, Richard, and Hausmaninger, Herbert (eds.), A Casebook on Roman Property Law, George A. Sheets (trans.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Gans, Eduard, System des Römischen Civilrechts im Grundrisse (Berlin: Ferdinand Dümmler, 1827).Google Scholar
Garat, Dominique-Joseph, “Nouvelles Litteraires: Suite de l’Extrait des Loix Municipales de Langeudoc, Etc.” (February 19, 1785) no. 8 Mercure de France 103–123.Google Scholar
Garaud, Marcel, Histoire Générale du Droit Privé Français: de 1789 à 1804, La Révolution et la Propriété Foncière, vol. 2 (Paris: Recueil Sirey, 1958).Google Scholar
Garnsey, Peter et al., The Roman Empire: Economy, Society and Culture, 2nd ed. (Oakland: University of California Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Gaudemet, Jean, “Tendances et Méthodes en Droit Romain” (1955) 145 Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Étranger 140–179.Google Scholar
Ghisalberti, Carlo, La Codificazione del Diritto in Italia, 1865–1942 (Rome: Laterza, 1985).Google Scholar
Giardina, Andrea, “The Transition to Late Antiquity,” in Scheidel, Walter, Morris, Ian, and Saller, Richard P. (eds.), The Cambridge Economic History of the Greco-Roman World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 741–768.Google Scholar
Gierke, Otto Friedrich von, Die soziale Aufgabe des Privatrechts (Berlin: Springer, 1889).Google Scholar
Gierke, Otto Friedrich von, Deutsches Privatrechts, vol. 2 (Leipzig: Duncker und Humblot, 1905).Google Scholar
Gierke, Otto Friedrich von, “The Social Role of Private Law,” Ewan McGaughey (trans.) (2018) 19(4) German Law Journal 1017–1116.Google Scholar
Goldhammer, Jesse, The Headless Republic: Sacrificial Violence in Modern French Thought (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Goltz, Theodor von der, Geschichte der deutschen Landwirtschaft (Stuttgart: Cotta, 1902–1903).Google Scholar
Gooch, George Peabody, Germany and the French Revolution (London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1920).Google Scholar
Gooch, George Peabody, History and Historians in the Nineteenth Century (London: Longman, Green and Co, 1913).Google Scholar
Gongora, Mario, Origen de los Inquilinos de Chile Central (Santiago: Editorial Universitaria, 1960).Google Scholar
Gordley, James, and Ugo, Mattei, “Protecting Possession” (1996) 44(2) The American Journal of Comparative Law 293–334.Google Scholar
Gordley, James R., “Suárez and Natural Law,” in Hill, Benjamin and Lagerlund, Henrik (eds.), The Philosophy of Francisco Suárez (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 209–229.Google Scholar
Gray, Marion W., Prussia in Transition: Society and Politics under the Stein Reform Ministry of 1808 (Philadelphia: The American Philosophical Society, 1958)Google Scholar
Grossi, Paolo, A History of European Law, Lawrence Hooper (trans.) (Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010).Google Scholar
Grossi, Paolo, Il Dominio e le Cose: Percezioni Medievali e Moderne Dei Diritti Reali (Milano: Giuffrè Editore, 1992).Google Scholar
Grossi, Paolo, “Un Paradiso per Pothier, Robert-Joseph Pothier e la Proprietà Moderna” (1985) 14 Quaderni Fiorentini per la Storia del Pensiero Giuridico Moderno 401–456.Google Scholar
Haferkamp, Hans-Peter, “The Science of Private Law and the State in Nineteenth Century Germany” (2008) 56(3) The American Journal of Comparative Law 667–689.Google Scholar
Hahn, Henricus, Dissertatio inauguralis de iure rerum et iuris in re speciebus harumque divisionibus in genere (Helmstedt: Heredes Lucii, 1639).Google Scholar
Hakim, Nader, “La Contribution de l’Université à l’Élaboration de la Doctrine Civiliste au XIXe siècle,” in Hecquard-Théron, Maryvonne (ed.), Les Facultés de Droit inspiratrices du droit? (Toulouse: Presses de l’Université des Sciences Sociales, 2005), 15–33.Google Scholar
Hakim, Nader, “Socialisation du droit et romantisme juridique: autour d’une controverse entre Julien Bonnecase et Paul Cuche,” in Gallinato-Contino, Bernard and Hakim, Nader (eds.), De la terre à l’usine: des hommes et du droit. Mélanges offerts à Gérard Aubin (Bordeaux: Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux, 2014), 139–173.Google Scholar
Harries, Jill, and Wood, I. N., The Theodosian Code (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Hawkins, Cameron, Roman Artisans and the Urban Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Hayem, Henri, “La Renaissance des Études Juridiques en France sous le Consulat” (1905) 29(3) Nouvelle Revue Historique de Droit Français et Étranger 96–122.Google Scholar
Henrion de Pansey, Pierre-Paul-Nicolas, “Justices de paix,” Ouvres Judiciaires du President Henrion de Pansey (Paris: Dussillon, 1843).Google Scholar
Hervé, Francois, Théorie des Matières Féodales et Censuelles, vol. 1 (Paris: Knapen and Sons, 1785).Google Scholar
Heyne, Christian Gottlob, Opuscula Academica Collecta, vol. 4 (Göttingen: Dieterich, 1796).Google Scholar
Higgs, Henry, The Physiocrats: Six Lectures of the French Economistes of the Eighteenth Century (London: MacMillan and Co., 1897).Google Scholar
Holbach, Paul-Henri-Dietrich d’, La Politique Naturelle, ou Discours sur les Vrais Principes du Gouvernement, vol. 1 (London: Marc-Michel Rey, 1773).Google Scholar
Holden, Jane, and Harrison, Carolyn (eds.), Law and Geography (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Ipsen, Günther, “Staat aus dem Volk: Scheitern, Wollen, Vollbringen des Freiherrn vom Stein in der Preußischen Reform” (1973) 12 Der Staat – Zeitschrift für Staatslehre 147, 157.Google Scholar
Israel, Jonathan I., The Enlightenment That Failed: Ideas, Revolution, and Democratic Defeat (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Israel, Jonathan I., Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650–1750 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Jakab, Éva, “Property Rights in Ancient Rome,” in Erdkamp, Paul, Verboven, Koenraad, and Zuiderhoek, Arjan (eds.), Ownership and Exploitation of Land and Natural Resources in the Roman World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), 107–131.Google Scholar
Jaksić, Ivan, Andrés Bello: Scholarship and Nation-Building in Nineteenth-Century Latin America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Jara, A., Ley de 10 de junio de 1823, in Legislación indigenista de Chile (Mexico: Instituto Indigenista Interamericano, 1956).Google Scholar
Jaraquemada, Pedro José Prado, Los Actuales Poseedores de Mayorazgos de Chile Apoyan la Justicia con que la Representacion Nacional ha Dercectado su Reduccion al Valor Primitivo en que se Fundaron (Santiago: Imprenta de la Independencia, 1827).Google Scholar
Jhering, Rudolf von, Der Kampf ums Recht, Vortrag des Hofrates Professor Jhering Gehalten in der Wiener Juristischen Gesellschaft am 11. März 1872 (Vienna: Manz’sche Buchhandlung, 1872).Google Scholar
Jhering, Rudolf von, Law as a Means to an End, Isaac Husik (trans.) (Boston: The Boston Book Company, 1913)Google Scholar
Jhering, Rudolf von, The Struggle for Law, John Lalor (trans.) (Chicago: Callaghan & Company, 1915).Google Scholar
Jhering, Rudolf von, Sul fondamento della protezione del possesso, Francesco Forlani (trans.) (Milan: Vallardi, 1872).Google Scholar
Jhering, Rudolf von, Der Zweck im Recht, vol. 1 (Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel, 1877).Google Scholar
Joerges, Christian, “Die Wissenschaft vom Privatrecht und der Nationalstaat,” EUI Working Paper LAW no. 98/4, European University Institute, 1998.Google Scholar
Jolowicz, Herbert Felix, and Nicholas, Barry, Historical Introduction to the Study of Roman Law, 3rd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972).Google Scholar
Jones, Peter M., The Peasantry in the French Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Jördens, Andrea, “Possession and Provincial Practice,” in du Plessis, Paul J., Ando, Clifford, and Touri, Kaius (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Roman Law and Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 553–568.Google Scholar
Josserand, Louis, “Configuration du droit de propriété dans l’ordre juridique nouveau,” in Mélanges juridiques, dédiés à M. le professeur Sugiyama (Tokyo: Association Japonaise des Juristes de Langue Française; Maison Franco-Japonaise, 1940), 95–110.Google Scholar
Josserand, Louis, De l’esprit des droits et de leur relativité: théorie dite de l’abus des droits, 2nd ed. (Paris: Dalloz, 1939).Google Scholar
Justi, Johann Heinrich Gottlob von, Staatswirtschaft (Leipzig: B. C. Breitkopf, 1758).Google Scholar
Kagan, K. Kahana, “Res Corporalis and Res Incorporalis: A Comparison of Roman and English Law of Interests of Life” (1945–1946) 20 Tulane Law Review 98–111.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Steven L., and Reinert, Sophus A. (eds.), The Economic Turn: Recasting Political Economy in Enlightenment Europe (London: Anthem Press, 2019), 30–120.Google Scholar
Kaser, Max, Eigentum und Besitz im älteren römischen Recht, 2nd ed. (Cologne: Böhlau, 1956).Google Scholar
Katz, Larissa, “Spite and Extortion: A Jurisdictional Principle of Abuse of Property Right” (2013) 122 Yale Law Journal 1444–1483.Google Scholar
Kehoe, Dennis P., Law and Rural Economy in the Roman Empire (Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Kehoe, Dennis P., “Property Rights over Land and Economic Growth in the Roman Empire,” in Erdkamp, Paul, Verboven, Koenraad, and Zuiderhoek, Arjan (eds.), Ownership and Exploitation of Land and Natural Resources in the Roman World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), 88–106.Google Scholar
Kehr, Eckart, “Zur Genesis der preußischen Bürokratie und des Rechtsstaats,” in Der Primat der Innenpolitik: Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Preussisch-Deutschen Sozialgeschichte im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert (Veröffentlichungen der Historischen Kommission zu Berlin), vol. 19 (1965), 31–52.Google Scholar
Kelley, Donald R., “Gaius Noster: Substructures of Western Social Thought” (1979) 84(3) The American Historical Review 619–648.Google Scholar
Kelley, Donald R., The Historians and the Law in Postrevolutionary France (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Kelley, Donald R., “The Metaphysics of Law: An Essay on the Very Young Marx” (1978) 83(2) American Historical Review 350–367.Google Scholar
Kelley, Donald R., and Smith, Bonnie G., “What Was Property? Legal Dimensions of the Social Question in France (1789–1848)” (1984) 128(3) Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 200–230.Google Scholar
Kitchen, Martin, The Political Economy of Germany 1815–1914 (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Klubock, Thomas, “Ránquil: Violence and Peasant Politics on Chile’s Southern Frontier” in Grandin, Greg and Joseph, Gilbert M. (eds.), A Century of Revolution: Insurgent and Counterinsurgent Violence during Latin America’s Long Cold War (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010), 121–159.Google Scholar
Knapp, Georg Friedrich, Die Bauernbefreiung und der Ursprung der Landarbeiter in den älteren Teilen Preußens (Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot, 1887).Google Scholar
Kocourek, Albert, “Introduction,” in von Jhering, Rudolf, The Struggle for Law, John Lalor (trans.) (Chicago: Callaghan and Company, 1915).Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart, Preußen zwischen Reform und Revolution: Allgemeines Landrecht, Verwaltung und soziale Bewegung von 1791 bis 1848 (Stuttgart: Ernst Klett Verlag, 1967).Google Scholar
Kraus, Christian Jacob, “Gutachten über die Aufhebung der Privatuntertänigkeit in Ost- und Westpreußen (1802),” in Conze, Werner (ed.), Quellen zur Geschichte der deutschen Bauernbefreiung (Göttingen: Musterschmidt, 1957), 66–75.Google Scholar
Kunkel, Wolfgang, An Introduction to Roman Legal and Constitutional History, John M. Kelly (trans.), 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, “Feudalism and Capitalism in Latin America” (May/June 1971) I(67) New Left Review 19–38.Google Scholar
Lamennais, Félicite Robert de, De l’esclavage moderne (Paris: Pagnerre Editeur, 1840).Google Scholar
Larousse, Pierre, Grand Dictionnaire Universel du XIXe Siècle, 17 vols. (Paris, 1868).Google Scholar
Laurent, François, Principes de droit civil Français, vol. 6 (Brussels: Bruylant, 1871).Google Scholar
Lee, Daniel, “‘Office Is a Thing Borrowed’: Jean Bodin on Offices and Seigneurial Government” (2013) 41(3) Political Theory 409–440.Google Scholar
Lee, Daniel, Popular Sovereignty in Early Modern Constitutional Thought (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
“Lettres au Redacteur du Producteur sur le systeme de la cooperation mutuelle, et de la communaute de biens, d’apres le pla de M Owen” (4 Julliut 1826) 4 Le Producteur: journal de l’industrie, des sciences et des beaux-arts 526–544.Google Scholar
Leibholz, Gerhard, “Carta del Lavoro 21 aprile 1927,” in Zu Den Problemen des ascistischen Verfassungrechts: Akademische Antrittsvorlesung (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2019 [1928]), 99–106.Google Scholar
Lemercier de la Riviere, Paul Pierre, L’Ordre Naturel et Essentiel de Societes Politiques (Paris: Desaint Libraire, 1767).Google Scholar
Lenaerts, Annekatrien, “The General Principle of the Prohibition of Abuse of Rights: A Critical Position on Its Role in a Codified European Contract Law” (2010) 18 European Review of Private Law 1121.Google Scholar
“Ley de Desamortización de Bienes de la Iglesia y de Corporaciones. Lerdo de Tejada, 25 de Junio de 1856,” in Derechos del pueblo mexicano. México a través de sus constituciones, volumen II, sección segunda (Historia constitucional, 1831–1918), https://archivos.juridicas.unam.mx/www/bjv/libros/12/5625/17.pdf.Google Scholar
“Ley de Nacionalización de los Bienes Eclesiásticos, 12 de julio de 1859,” in Derechos del pueblo mexicano México a través de sus constituciones, volumen II, sección segunda (Historia constitucional, 1831–1918), https://archivos.juridicas.unam.mx/www/bjv/libros/12/5625/23.pdf.Google Scholar
“Ley Sobre Ocupación y Enajenación de Terrenos Baldios de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos, 26 de marzo de 1894,” in Derechos del pueblo mexicano, México a través de sus constituciones, volumen II, sección segunda (Historia constitucional,1831–1918), https://archivos.juridicas.unam.mx/www/bjv/libros/2/940/39.pdf.Google Scholar
Liberatore, Pasquale, Trattato dell’ Enfiteusi in Corso di diritto civile del Signor Delvincourt, novellamente tradotto dall’ultima edizione francese ed accompagnato dalla nuova giurisprudenza civile del Regno delle Due Sicilie, vol. 10 (Naples: Nel Nuovo Gabinetto Letterario Largo Trinità Maggiore, 1841).Google Scholar
Lieber, Francis, Reminiscences of an Intercourse with Mr. Niebuhr, the Historian During a Residence with Him in Rome, in the Years 1822 and 1823 (Philadelphia: Carey, Lea & Blanchard, 1835).Google Scholar
Lindenfeld, David F., The Practical Imagination: The German Sciences of the State in the Nineteenth Century (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Livy, , Ab Urbe Condita, Conway, Robert Seymour and Walters, C. Flamstead (eds.) (Oxonii: E Typographeo Clarendoniano, 1914), 44–50.Google Scholar
Locré de Roissy, Jean Guillaume, Esprit du Code Napoléo, vol. 1 (Paris: Imprimerie Impériale,1805).Google Scholar
Loria, Achille, “Socialismo Giuridico” (1893) 1 La Scienza del Diritto Privato 419–527.Google Scholar
Luzzatto, Giuseppe, Sul regime del suolo nelle province romane: spunti critici e problematica. in Atti del Convegno Internationale sul tema: I diritti locali nelle province romane con particolare riguardo alle condizioni giuridiche del suolo (Roma, 26–28 ottobre 1971) (Rome: Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, 1974).Google Scholar
Lyttelton, Adrian (ed.), Italian Fascisms from Pareto to Gentile (New York: Harper and Row, 1975).Google Scholar
Mackrell, John Q. C., The Attack on “Feudalism” in Eighteenth Century France (London: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar
MacRae, Duncan, Legible Religion: Books, Gods, and Rituals in Roman Culture (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Magallón Ibarra, Jose Mario, Instituciones de Derecho Civil, vol. 1 (Mexico: El Porrua, 1987).Google Scholar
Maleville, Jacques de, Analyse Raisonnée de la Discussion du Code Civil au Conseil d’État, vol. 2 (Paris, 1805).Google Scholar
Mann, Golo, Deutsche Geschichte des 19. und 20. Jahrhunderts (Frankfurt a.M.: Fischer, 1969).Google Scholar
Manning, Joseph G., The Last Pharaohs: Egypt under the Ptolemies, 305–30 BC. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Marcadé, Victor-Napoléon, Élements du Droit Civil Français ou Explication Méthodique et Raisonée du Code Civil, vol. 2 (Paris: Cotillon, 1842).Google Scholar
Markoff, John, The Abolition of Feudalism: Peasants, Lords and the Legislators in the French Revolution (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, 1 Das Kapital, 25 Karl Marx-Freiderich Engles Werke (Berlin: Dietz, 1972).Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, 3 Das Kapital, 25 Karl Marx-Freiderich Engles Werke (Berlin: Dietz, 1972).Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, Einleitung, 13 Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, Marx Engels Werke 615–641 (Berlin: Dietz, 1971).Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, Zur Kritik der Hegelschen Rechtsphilosophie, 1 Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, Marx Engels Werke 203–333 (Berlin: Dietz, 1981).Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, “Zur Kritik der politischen Okonomie,” in A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, S. W. Ryazanskaya (trans.), Dobb, Maurice (ed.) (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1970).Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, and Engels, Friedrich, “Manifest der Kommunistischen Partei,” in Manifesto of the Communist Party, Karl Marx and Frederick Engels (trans.), Engels, Frederick (ed.) (Chicago: Charles H. Kerr & Company, 1888).Google Scholar
Mauer, Hermann, Das landschaftliche Kreditwesen Preußens agrargeschichtlich und volkwirtschaftlich betrachtet: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Bodenkreditpolitik des Preußischen Staates (Straßburg: Verlag von Karl F. Trübner, 1907).Google Scholar
Maupetit, Michel-René, Lettres de Michel-René Maupetit: Député à l’Assemblée Nationale Constituante (Charleston, SC: Nabu Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Maza, Sarah, The Myth of the French Bourgeoisie: An Essay on the Social Imaginary 1750–1850 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
“Mensaje con que el Presidente de la República, don Manuel Montt, y el Ministro de Justicia, don Francisco Javier Ovalle, remitieron al congreso de 22 de noviembre de 18 el proyecto de Código Civil,” in Urquieta, Pedro L. (ed.), Obras Completas de Andres Bello (Caracas: Fundacion la Casa de Bello, 1981), 87–106.Google Scholar
Merlin, Philippe-Antoine, Rapport fait au comité des droits féodaux le 4 septembre 1789, sur l’objet et l’ordre du travail dont il est chargé (Versailles: Baudouin, 1789).Google Scholar
Meyer, Eugenia, “Introducción Biográfica,” in Cabrera, Luis (ed.), Obras Completas, vol. 1 (Mexico: Ediciones Oasis, 1972), viii–xix.Google Scholar
Mirabeau, Victor R., L’Ami des Hommes ou Traité de la Population, vol. 1 (Avignon, 1756).Google Scholar
Mirow, M. C., Latin American Law: A History of Private Law and Institutions in Spanish America (Austin: University of Texas Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Mirow, M. C., “Léon Duguit and the Social Function of Property in Argentina,” in Babie, Paul and Viven-Wilksch, Jessica (eds.), Léon Duguit and the Social Obligation Norm of Property: A Translation and Global Exploration (Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2019), 267–285.Google Scholar
Mirow, M. C., “Origins of the Social Function of Property in Chile” (2011) 80 Fordham Law Review 1183–1218.Google Scholar
Moatti, Claudia, The Birth of Critical Thinking in Republican Rome, Janet Lloyd (trans.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Momigliano, Arnaldo, “Niebuhr and the Agrarian Problems of Rome” (1982) 21(4) History and Theory 3–15.Google Scholar
Mommsen, Theodor, “Nuovo esemplare dell’editto ‘de accusationibus’ di Costantino: Lettera del Prof. T. Mommsen al Prof. V. Scialoja” (1889) 2 Bullettino dell’Istituto di Diritto Romano 129–135.Google Scholar
Monateri, Pier Giuseppe, and Somma, Allesandro “The Fascist Theory of Contract,” in Stolleis, Michael et al. (eds.), Darker Legacies of Law in Europe (London: Bloomsbury, 2003), 55–70.Google Scholar
Monier, Raymond, “La date d’apparition du dominium et de la distinction juridique des res en corporales et incorporales,” in Studi in onore di Siro Solozzi (Naples: Jovene, 1948), 357–374.Google Scholar
Monson, Andrew, Communal Agriculture in the Ptolemaic and Roman Fayyum Princeton/Stanford Working Papers in Classics Paper No. 100703 (2007), doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1426939.Google Scholar
Monson, Andrew, From the Ptolemies to the Romans: Political and Economic Change in Egypt (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
de Montmorency, J. E., “Robert Jospeh Pothier and French Law” (1914) 13 Journal of the Society of Comparative Legislation and International Law 265–287.Google Scholar
Mooers, Colin, The Making of Bourgeois Europe: Absolutism, Revolution, and the Rise of Capitalism England, France and Germany (London: Verso, 1991).Google Scholar
Moore, Barrington, Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World (Boston: Beacon Press, 1966).Google Scholar
Motte, Olivier J., “Demolombe, Jean Charles Florent,” in Stolleis, Michael (ed.), Juristen: ein biographisches Lexikon; von der Antike bis zum 20. Jahrhundert, 2nd ed. (Munich: Beck, 2001).Google Scholar
Mottek, Hans, Wirtschaftsgeschichte Deutschlands: Ein Grundriss (Berlin: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, 1957).Google Scholar
Mourlon, Frédéric, Répétitions Écrites sur le Code Civil, 13th ed., vol. 1 (Paris: Garnier, 1896).Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel, and Sartori, Andrew, “Approaches to Global Intellectual History,” in Global Intellectual History (New York: Columbia University Press, 2013), 3–30.Google Scholar
Munzer, Stephen R., A Theory of Property (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Narváez Hernández, José Ramón, “El Código Privado-Social: Influencia de Francesco Cosentini en el Código Civil Mexicano de 1928” (2004) 16 Anuario Mexicano de Historia del Derecho 201–226.Google Scholar
Natoli, Luigi Ferlazzo, Letteratura e Diritti. Scritti su Salvatore Pugliatti (Milan: Giuffrè, 2002).Google Scholar
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg, The History of Rome, Julius Charles Hare and Connop Thirlwall (trans.), vol. 2 (Philadelphia: Thomas Wardle, 1835).Google Scholar
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg, “Letter 213 to Savigny Venice 4th Sept., 1816,” in Chevalier Bunsen, , Brandis, , and Lorbell, (eds.), The Life and Letters of Barthold George Niebuhr: With Essays on His Character and Influence (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1852), 319–321.Google Scholar
Niort, Jean-François, “Le Code civil ou la réaction à l’œuvre en Métropole et aux Colonies,” in Niort, (ed.), Du Code noir au Code Civil. Jalons pour l’Histoire du Droit à la Guadeloupe. Perspectives Comparées avec La Martinique, La Guyane et la République d’Haïti (Paris: L’Harmattan, 2007), 59–86.Google Scholar
Nippel, Wilfried, Ancient and Modern Democracy: Two Concepts of Liberty?, Keith Tribe (trans.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Obermann, Karl, “Bemerkungen über die soziale und nationale Bedeutung der preußischen Reformbewegung unter dem Ministerium des Freiherrn vom Stein,” in Die Volksmassen: Gestalter der Geschichte – Festgabe für Leo Stern (Berlin: Rutten & Loening 1962), 127–153.Google Scholar
Olson, Richard G., Science and Scientism in Nineteenth-Century Europe (Urbana; Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Ortolan, Joseph-Louis-Elzéar, Explication Historique des Instituts de l‘Empereur Justinien, 6th ed., vol. 1 (Paris: H. Plon, 1857).Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor, “How Types of Goods and Property Rights Jointly Affect Collective Action” (2003) 15 Journal of Theoretical Politics 239–270.Google Scholar
Ouvry, Henry Aimé, Stein and His Reformers in Prussia, with Reference to the Land Question in England: And an Appendix Containing the Views of Richard Cobden and J. S. Mill’s Advice to Land Reformers (London: Kerby and Endean, 1873).Google Scholar
Pardessus, Jean-Marie, “Rapport de la commission,” in Vanufel, Charles and de Villeneuve, Clément Felix Champion (eds.), Code des Colons de Saint-Domingue (Paris: Vergne, 1826), 93–134.Google Scholar
Parker, Harold Talbot, The Cult of Antiquity and the French Revolutionaries: A Study in the Development of the Revolutionary Spirit (London: Octagon Books, 1965).Google Scholar
Paterculus, Velleius, Compendium of Roman History Augusti, Frederick W. Shipley (trans.) (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1924).Google Scholar
Patetta, Friderico (ed.), “Excerpta Codicis Vaticani Reg. 435,” in Gaudenzi, Antonio and Palmerio, Giovanni Battista (eds.), Bibliotheca iuridica medii aevi, vol. 2 (Bologna: Libreria Fratelli Treves di Pietro Virano, 1892), p. 135–136.Google Scholar
Peabody, Sue, “There Are No Slaves in France”: The Political Culture of Race and Slavery in the Ancien Régime (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Pereira, Juan de Solórzano, Politica Indiana (1647), https://rarebooks.library.nd.edu/exhibits/durand/indies/solorzano.html.Google Scholar
Perozzi, Silvio, Sulla struttura delle servitù prediali in diritto romano (Rome: Forzani, 1888).Google Scholar
Perry, Erskine, Von Savigny’s Treatise on Possession: Or the Jus Possessionis of the Civil Law, 6th ed. (London: S. Sweet, 1848).Google Scholar
Phipps, Helen, “The Agrarian Phase of the Mexican Revolution of 1910–1920” (1924) 39(1) Political Science Quarterly 1–18.Google Scholar
Pinelo, Antonio De León, Tratado de Confirmaciones Reales, Encomiendas, Oficios y Casos en que se Requieren para las Indias (s.n., 1630).Google Scholar
“Plan de Ayala: Edicion Conmemorativa 93” (Camera de Disputados 2019) (original published in 1913), http://biblioteca.diputados.gob.mx/janium/bv/ce/lxiv/plan-ayala.pdf.Google Scholar
Planck, Gottlieb Jakob, Leges agrariae pestiferae et execrabiles, Opuscula Academica Collecta, vol. 4, Heyne, Christian Gottlob (ed.) (Göttingen: Dieterich, 1796), 350–373.Google Scholar
Planiol, Marcel, Traité élémentaire de droit civil, 4th ed., vol. 2 (Paris: Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence, 1907).Google Scholar
Plessis, Paul Du, Borkowski’s Textbook on Roman Law, 4th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Plutarch, , Vitae Parallelae: Tiberius Gracchus, vol. 2, Schaefer, E. G. H. (ed.) (Leipzig: J. A. G. Weigelii, 1820–1822).Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A., The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law: A Study of English Historical Thought in the Seventeenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Pollock, Federick, “Review of ‘Property, Its Duties and Rights Historically, Philosophically and Religiously Regarded: Essays by Various Writers, with an Introduction by the Bishop of Oxford’” (1914) 30 The Law Quarterly Review 111–112.Google Scholar
Poly, Jean-Pierre, and Bournazel, Eric, The Feudal Transformation, 900–1200, Caroline Higgitt (trans.) (New York: Holmes & Meier, 1991).Google Scholar
Poly, Jean-Pierre, and Bournazel, Eric, La Mutation Féodale, Xe–XIIe Siècles (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1980).Google Scholar
Portalis, Jean-Étienne-Marie, “Discours de rentrée à l’Académie de législation. Paris – 26 novembre 1803” (2014) Les Cahiers Portalis 31–34.Google Scholar
Portalis, Jean-Étienne-Marie, “Essai sur l’utlité de la codification,” in Discours, Rapport et Travaux inédits sur le Code Civil (Paris: Joubert, 1844), 5–6.Google Scholar
Portalis, Jean-Étienne-Marie, “Exposé des motifs du projet de loi sur la propriété, titre II, livre II du Code Civil, présenté le 26 Nivôse an XII,” in Ecrits et discours juridiques et politiques (Marseille: Presses Universitaires d’Aix, 1988), 111–127.Google Scholar
Portalis, Jean-Étienne-Marie, “Exposé general du système du Code Civil,” in Locré de Roissy, Jean Guillaume (ed.), La législation civile, commerciale et criminelle de la France, ou Commentaire et complément des Code Français, vol. 1 (Paris: Treuttel and Würtz, 1827), 316–336.Google Scholar
Pothier, Robert Joseph, Oeuvres posthumes de M. Pothier, vol. 1 (Paris: Guillaume Debure, 1777).Google Scholar
Pothier, Robert Joseph, Traité du Droit de Domaine de Propriété, vol. 1 (Paris: Guillaume Debure, 1772).Google Scholar
Programa del Partido Liberal Mexicano y Manifiesto a la Nacion (Mexico: Archivo General de la Nación, July 1, 1906).Google Scholar
Proudhon, Jean-Baptiste-Victor, Traité du Domaine de Propriété (Brussels: Meline, Cans et compagnie, 1842).Google Scholar
Proudhon, Pierre-Joseph, “Lettre à Karl Marx, Lyon, 17 mai 1846,” in Langlois, J. A. L (ed.), Correspondance de P.-J. Proudhon, vol. 2 (Geneva: Slatkine Reprints, 1971), 198–202.Google Scholar
Proudhon, Pierre-Joseph, “Qu’est-ce que la propriété?,” in Kelley, Donald R. and Smith, Bonnie G. (eds. and trans.), Oeuvres completes de P.-J. Proudhon, vol. 1 (Paris: Lacroix Editeurs, 1873), 200–230.Google Scholar
Proudhon, Pierre-Joseph, “Qu’est-ce que la propriété?,” in Kelley, Donald R. and Smith, Bonnie G. (eds. and trans.), What Is Property? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), 200–230.Google Scholar
Puchta, Georg Friedrich, Corso delle Istituzioni di G. F. Puchta, Antonio Turchiarulo (trans.) (Naples: Tipografia all’insegna del Diogene, 1854).Google Scholar
Puchta, Georg Friedrich, Cursus der Institutionen, vol. 3 (Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel, 1841–1847).Google Scholar
Quesnay, Francois, “Maximes générales du gouvernement économique d’un royaume agricole et notes sur ces maximes,” in Oncken, Auguste (ed.), Oeuvres économiques et philosophiques de F. Quesnay (Paris: Jules Peelman, 1888), 330–336.Google Scholar
Quinzacara, Eduardo Cordero, “La Dogmática Constitucional de la Propiedad en el Derecho Chileno” (2006) 33 Revista Chilena de Derecho 125.Google Scholar
Ramirez Rondo, María Deborah, “Concepión del Estado Agrario en Andrés Bello” (2015) 41 Revista de Derecho y Reforma Agraria 91–96.Google Scholar
Rathbone, Dominic W., “The Control and Exploitation of ager publicus in Italy under the Roman Republic,” in Aubert, Jean-Jacques (ed.), Tâches publiques en enterprise privée dans le monde romain (Geneva: University of Neuchâtel, 2003), 135–178.Google Scholar
Rathbone, Dominic W., Economic Rationalism and Rural Society in Third-Century A.D. Egypt: The Heroninos Archive and the Appianus Estate (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Reimann, Mathias, “Nineteenth Century German Legal Science” (1990) 31(4) Boston College Law Review 837–897.Google Scholar
Reinert, Sophus A., “Another Grand Tour: Cameralism and Antiphysiocracy in Baden, Tuscany and Denmark-Norway,” in Backhaus, Jurgen (ed.), Physiocracy, Antiphysiocracy and Pfeiffer (New York: Springer, 2011), 39–96.Google Scholar
Rémy, Philippe, “Le Rôle de l’Exégèse dans l’Enseignement du Droit au XIXe Siècle” (1985) Revue d’Histoire des Facultés de Droit et de la Culture Juridique, du Monde des Juristes et du Livre Juridique 91–105.Google Scholar
Renauldon, Joseph, Traité Historique et Pratique des Droits Seigneuriaux (Paris: Despilly, 1765).Google Scholar
Renner, Karl, The Institutions of Private Law and Their Social Functions, Agnes Zchwarzschild (trans.) (London: Routledge, 1949).Google Scholar
Renner, Karl, Die Rechtinstitute des Privatrechts und ihre sozial Function: Ein Beitrag zur Kritik des bürgerlichen Rechts (Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1929).Google Scholar
Reuter, Timothy, “Debate: The Feudal Revolution: III” (1997) 155 Past & Present 177–195.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Susan, “Fiefs and Vassals: Fiefs and Vassals after Twelve Years,” in Bagge, Sverre, Gelting, Michael H., and Lindkvist, Thomas (eds.), Feudalism: New Landscapes of Debate (Turnhout: Brepols, 2011), 15–26.Google Scholar
Ripert, Georges, “Abus ou relativité des droitsin” (1929) 49 Revue critique de législation et de jurisprudence 33–63.Google Scholar
Ritter, Gerhard, Stein – Eine politische Biographie, 3rd ed. (Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlagsanstalt, 1958).Google Scholar
di Robilant, Anna, and Syed, Talha, “Property’s Building Blocks: Hohfeld in Europe and Beyond,” in Balganesh, Shyamkrishna, Sichelman, Ted, and Smith, Henry E. (eds.), Wesley Hohfeld a Century Later Edited Work, Select Personal Papers, and Original Commentaries (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022), 223–257.Google Scholar
Rodotà, Stefano, Il terribile diritto. Studi sulla proprietà privata e i beni comuni (Bologna: Il Mulino, 2013).Google Scholar
Roederer, Pierre-Louis, De la Propriété Considérée dans ses rapports avec les droits politiques, 3rd ed. (Paris: Hector Bossange, 1830).Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre, The Society of Equals, Arthur Goldhammer, trans. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Rose, Carol M., “Canons of Property Talk, or Blackstone’s Anxiety” (1998) 108 Yale Law Journal 601–632.Google Scholar
Rose, R. B., “The Red Scare of the 1790s: The French Revolution and the Agrarian Law” (1984) 103(1) Past & Present 113–130.Google Scholar
Roselaar, Saskia, Public Land in the Roman Republic: A Social and Economic History of Ager Publicus in Italy, 396–89 BC (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Hans, Bureaucracy, Aristocracy and Autocracy: The Prussian Experience 1660–1815 (Boston: Beacon Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Rossi-Doria, Malio, Riforma Agraria e Azione Meridionalista (Naples: L’ancora del Mediterraneo, 2003 [1948]).Google Scholar
Rota, Antonio, “L’apparato di Pillio alle Consuetudines feudorum e il Ms. 1004 dell’Archivo di Stato di Roma” (1938) 14 Studi e Memorie per la storia dell’Università di Bologna 112–113.Google Scholar
Rudorff, Adolf August Friedrich, “Ueber den Rechtsgrund der possessorischen Interdicte” (1831) 7 Zeitschrift für geschichtliche Rechtswissenschaften 90–114.Google Scholar
Ruefner, Thomas, “The Roman Concept of Ownership and the Medieval Doctrine of Dominium Utile,” in Cairns, John W. and du Plessis, Paul J. (eds.), The Creation of Ius Commune: From Casus to Regula (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2010), 127–142.Google Scholar
Ruiz, Francisco H., “La Socialization del Derecho Privado y el Codigo Civil de 1928” (July–December 1946) 8 Revista de la Escuela Nacional de Jurisprudencia 45–88.Google Scholar
Saleilles, Raymond, Étude sur la théorie générale de l’obligation d’après le premier projet de code civil pour l’Empire allemand, 2nd ed. (Paris: F. Pichon, 1901).Google Scholar
Samburski, Samuel, Physics of the Stoics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1959).Google Scholar
Samuels, Warren J., “The Physiocratic Theory of Property and the State” (1961) 75 The Quarterly Journal of Economics 96–111.Google Scholar
Sanders, James E., The Vanguard of the Atlantic World. Creating Modernity, Nation and Democracy in Nineteenth-Century Latin America (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Santamaria, Fransisco, Nuevo código civil para el Distrito y territorios federales : expedido en 30 de agosto de 1928; exposición de motivos, de la Comisión autora del Proyecto (Mexico: Ediciones Botas, 1933).Google Scholar
Sarris, Peter, “The Eastern Empire from Constantine to Heraclius (306–641),” in Mango, Cyril (ed.), The Oxford History of Byzantium (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), 19–70.Google Scholar
Savigny, Friedrich Karl von, Vom Beruf unserer Zeit für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft (Heidelberg: Mohr und Zimmer, 1814).Google Scholar
Savigny, Friedrich Karl von, Geschichte des römischen Rechts im Mittelalter, vol. 1 (Heidelberg: Mohr und Zimmer, 1826)Google Scholar
Savigny, Friedrich Karl von, The History of the Roman Law During the Middle Ages, Elias Cathcart (trans.), vol. 1 (London: Adam Black, 1829).Google Scholar
Savigny, Friedrich Karl von, Das Recht des Besitzes. Eine civilistische Abhandlung (Giessen: Heyer, 1803).Google Scholar
Savigny, Friedrich Karl von, System des heutigen römischen Rechts, vol. 1 (Berlin: Veit, 1840).Google Scholar
Savigny, Friedrich Karl von, System of Modern Roman Law, William Holloway (trans.), vol. 1 (Madras: J. Higginbotham, 1867).Google Scholar
Savigny, Friedrich Karl von, Of the Vocation of Our Age for Legislation and Jurisprudence, Abraham Hayward (trans.) (London: Littlewood & Co., 1831).Google Scholar
Savigny, Friedrich Karl von, Von Savigny’s Treatise on Possession: Or, the Jus Possessionis of the Civil Law, Erskine Perry (trans.) (London: S. Sweet, 1848).Google Scholar
Scheidel, Walter (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Schiavone, Aldo, Alle Origini del Diritto Romano Rorghese: Hegel Contro Savigny (Rome: Laterza, 1984).Google Scholar
Schiavone, Aldo, The End of the Past: Ancient Rome and the Modern West, Margery H. Schneider (trans.) (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Schiavone, Aldo, The Invention of Law in the West, Jeremy Carden and Antony Shugar (trans.) (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Schiavone, Aldo, La storia spezzata. Roma antica e Occidente moderno (Rome: Laterza, 1996).Google Scholar
Schissler, Hanna, Preußische Agrargesellschaft im Wandel – Wirtschaftliche, gesellschaftliche und politische Transformationsprozesse von 1763–1847 (Göttingen: Vandenhoek und Ruprecht, 1978).Google Scholar
Schlumbohm, Jürgen, Freiheit: Die Anfänge der bürgerlichen in Deutschland im Spiegel ihres Leitwortes (Düsseldorf: Pädagogischer Verlag Schwann, 1975).Google Scholar
Schmidt, Walter, “Marx und Engels über den historischen Platz der preußischen Reformen,” in Preußische Reformen – Wirkungen und Grenzen. Aus Anlass des 150. Todestages des Freiherrn vom und zum Stein (Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1982), 54–74.Google Scholar
Schorr, David B., “How Blackstone Became a Blackstonian” (2009) 10 Theoretical Inquiries in Law 103–126.Google Scholar
Scialoja, Vittorio, “Aemulatio,” in Enciclopedia Giuridica Italiana, vol. 1 (Milan: Società Editrice Libraria, 1910), 426–452.Google Scholar
Scialoja, Vittorio, “Nota a Corte di Cassazione di Firenze del 13 dicembre 1877” (1878) III(1) Il Foro Italiano 481–493.Google Scholar
Scialoja, Vittorio, Teoria della proprietà nel diritto romano, Bonfante, Pietro (ed.), vol. 1 (Rome: Sampaolesi, 1928).Google Scholar
Scozzafava, Oberdan Tommaso, “La Soluzione Proprietaria di Robert-Joseph Pothier” (1980) 9 Rivista Diritto Commerciale 327–344.Google Scholar
Seneca, Lucius Annaeus, De beneficiis: Opera Quae Supersunt, Haase, Friedrich (ed.), vol. 2 (Leipzig: De Gruyter, 1884).Google Scholar
Seppel, Marten and Tribe, Keith (eds.), Cameralism in Practice: State Administration and Economy in Early Modern Europe (Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Servant, Hélène, “Les registres d’état civil en Guadeloupe: le reflet d’une histoire mouvementée” (2007) 146–147 Bulletin de la Société d’Histoire de la Guadeloupe 93–111.Google Scholar
“Sesión del Congreso Nacional 66, en 21 de marzo de 1825, número 151, por Frai Matías Fuenzalida,” in Letelier, Valentín (ed.), Sesiones de los Cuerpos Lejislativos de la República de Chile (1810–1845), vol. 11 (Valparaíso: Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional de Chile, 1886–1908), p. 476–477.Google Scholar
Seton-Watson, Christopher, Italy from Liberalism to Fascism, 1870–1925 (London: Methuen, 1967).Google Scholar
Sheehan, James, German Liberalism in the Nineteenth Century (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Sherwin-White, Adrian Nicholas, The Roman Citizenship (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Shovlin, John, The Political Economy of Virtue: Luxury, Patriotism, and the Origins of the French Revolution (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Simon, Walter M., The Failure of the Prussian Reform Movement 1807–1919 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1955).Google Scholar
Simonde de Sismondi, J.-C.-L., Nouveaux principes d’économie politique ou De la richesse dans ses rapports avec la population (Paris: Delaunay Libraire, 1819).Google Scholar
Singer, Joseph W., “Property as the Law of Democracy” (2014) 63 Duke Law Journal 1287–1336.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda, States and Social Revolutions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E., “Property as the Law of Things” (2012) 125 Harvard Law Review 1691–1726.Google Scholar
Smith, Vanessa, “Joseph Banks’s Intermediaries: Rethinking Global Cultural Exchange,” in Moyn, Samuel and Sartori, Andrew (eds.), Global Intellectual History (New York: Columbia University Press, 2013), 81–109.Google Scholar
Snowden, Frank M., Violence and the Great Estates in the South of Italy: Apulia, 1900–1922 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Solar, Luis Claro, De los Bienes, in 4 Explicaciones de Derecho Civil y Comparado 8 (Santiago: Jurídica de Chile, 1992).Google Scholar
Solar, Luis Claro, “Nota a sentencia” (1905) 3 Revista de derecho y jurisprudencia 294–301.Google Scholar
Somma, Allesandro “I Giuristi Francesi e il Diritto della ‘Grande Trasformazione,’” in Durand, Bernard, Le Crom, Jean Pierre, and Somma, Allesandro (eds.), Le droit sous Vichy (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klosterman, 2006), 437–452.Google Scholar
Steel, Catherine, “Introduction: The Legacy of the Roman Republican Senate” (2015) 7(1) Classical Receptions Journal 1–10.Google Scholar
Steenland, Kyle, “Notes on Feudalism and Capitalism in Latin America” (1975) 2(1) Latin American Perspectives 49–58.Google Scholar
Stein, Peter, Regulae Iuris: From Juristic Rules to Legal Maxims (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1966).Google Scholar
Stein, Peter Roman Law in European History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Steinlechner, Paul, Das Wesen der iuris communio und iuris quasi communio (Innsbruck: Wagner, 1876).Google Scholar
Stella, Attilio, “Bringing the Feudal Law Back Home: Social Practice and the Law of Fiefs in Italy and Provence (1100–1250)” (2020) 46(4) Journal of Medieval History 396–418.Google Scholar
Stewart, John Hall, A Documentary Survey of the French Revolution (New York: Macmillan, 1951).Google Scholar
Summenhart, Konrad, De contractibus (Hagenaw: Heinrich Gran for Johannes Rynman, 1500).Google Scholar
Taine, Hippolyte, Les Origines de la France Contemporaine: La Révolution (Paris: Hachette and Co., 1882).Google Scholar
Talamanca, Mario, “Gli ordinamenti provinciali nella prospettiva dei giuristi tardoclassici,” in Archi, Gian Gualberto (ed.), Istituzioni giuridiche e realtà politiche nel tardo impero (III–V sec. d.C.) (Milan: Giuffrè, 1976), 95–246.Google Scholar
Temin, Peter, The Roman Market Economy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Thomas, Yan, “Le valeur des choses: Le droit romain hors la religion” (2002) 57(6) Annales: Histoire, Sciences Sociales 1431–1462.Google Scholar
Tibiletti, Gianfranco, “Il possesso dell’ager publicus e le norme de modo agrorum sino ai Gracchi” (1948) 26 Athenaeum 173–236.Google Scholar
Tibiletti, Gianfranco, “Il possesso dell’ager publicus e le norme de modo agrorum sino ai Gracchi” (1949) 27 Athenaeum 3–42.Google Scholar
Tierney, Brian, Liberty and Law: The Idea of Permissive Natural Law, 1100–1800 (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Toews, John Edward, Becoming Historical: Cultural Reformation and Public Memory in Early Nineteenth‐Century Berlin (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Toullier, Charles-Bonaventure-Marie, Le Droit Civil Français Suivant l’Ordre du Code, 6th ed., vols. 1–3 (Paris: Cotillon, 1846).Google Scholar
Toynbee, Arnold, Hannibal’s Legacy: The Hannibalic War’s Effects on Roman Life (London: Oxford University Press, 1965).Google Scholar
Troplong, Raymond Theodore, Commentaire sur la prescription (Brussels: Meline, Cans et Compagnie, 1843).Google Scholar
Troplong, Raymond Theodore, De la propriété d’après le Code civil (Paris: Pagnerre, 1848).Google Scholar
Trosne, Guillaume-François Le, De l’Ordre Social: Ouvrage Suivi d’un Traité Élémentaire sur la Valeur, l’Argent, la Circulation, l’Industrie et le Commerce Intérieur et Extérieur (Paris: Guillaume Debure, 1777).Google Scholar
Trosne, Guillaume-François Le, Éloge Historique de M. Pothier (Orleans: Vve Rouzeau-Montaut, 1773).Google Scholar
Trucco, Humberto, “Teoría de la posesión inscrita dentro del Código Civil chileno” (August 1910) 7(6) Rvista de derecho y jurisprudencia 132–150.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard, The Sleeping Sovereign: The Invention of Modern Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Tuori, Kaius, “The Myth of Quintus Mucius Scaevola: Founding Father of Legal Science?” (2004) 72(3–4) Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 243–262.Google Scholar
Tuori, Kaius, and Björklund, Heta (eds.), Roman Law and the Idea of Europe (London: Bloomsbury, 2019).Google Scholar
Ulpian, , Liber singularis regularum, Krueger, Paulus (ed.) (Berolini: Apud Weidmannos, 1878).Google Scholar
Vardi, Liana, The Physiocrats and the World of the Enlightenment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Vargas, Victorio Pescio, Manual de derecho civil, vol. 9 (Santiago: Jurídica de Chile, 1978).Google Scholar
Vassalli, Fillippo E., Scritti Giuridici: Contributi alla teoria dei beni pubblici, vol. 2 (Milan: Giuffrè, 1960).Google Scholar
Vicuna, Félix Vicuña, El Porvenir del Hombre (Valparaiso: Imprenta del Comercio, 1858).Google Scholar
Vidal, Michel, “La Propriété dans l’école de l’exégèse en France” (1976–1977) 5–6 Quaderni Fioreninti per la Storia del Pensiero Giuridico Moderno 7–40.Google Scholar
Villata, Maria Di Renzi “La Formazione dei Libri Feudorum, tra Pratica di Giudici e Scienza di Dottori,” in Il Feudalesimo nell’Alto Medioevo (Spoleto: Preso de SEDE del Centro, 2000), 651–720.Google Scholar
Villey, Michel, Le droit et les droits de l’homme (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1983).Google Scholar
Villey, Michel, La formation de la pensee juridique moderne, 4th ed. (Paris: Montchretien, 1975).Google Scholar
Vinogradoff, Paul, “Introduction,” in Huebner, Rudolf (ed.), A History of Germanic Private Law, Francis S. Philbrick (trans.) (Boston: Little, Brown & Company, 1918).Google Scholar
Visscher, Fernand de, Nouvelles études de droit romain: public et privé (Milan: Giuffrè, 1949).Google Scholar
Vita, Anna de, “Proprietà e Persona nella Strategia dell’Esclusione. Rimeditare Vichy: Tutto in Ordine Niente a Posto,” in Le droit sous Vichy (Frankfort am Main: Klosterman, 2006), 11–50.Google Scholar
Wächter, Carl Georg von, Handbuch des im Königreiche Württemberg geltenden Privatrechts (Stuttgart: Metzler, 1842).Google Scholar
Wächter, Carl Georg von, “Ueber Theilung und Theilbarkeit der Sachen und Rechte” (1844) 27 Archiv für die civilistische Praxis 155.Google Scholar
Wakefield, Andre, The Disordered Police State: German Cameralism as Science and Practice (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Warmelo, Paul van, “Aspects of Joint Ownership in Roman Law” (1957) 25(2) Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 125–195.Google Scholar
Watkins, Thomas H., “Vespasian and the Italic Right” (1988) 84(2) The Classical Journal 117–136.Google Scholar
Watson, Alan, “The Birth of the Legal Profession” (1987) 85 Michigan Law Review 1071–1082.Google Scholar
Watson, Alan, The Law of Property in the Later Roman Republic (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Weimar, Peter, “Die Handschriften des Liber Feudorum und seiner Glossen” (1990) 1 Rivista Intenrazionale di Diritto Comune 31–98.Google Scholar
Wesenbeck, Matthaeus, “ad Digest 41.1,” in Pandectas Iuris Civilis (Basel: Eusebius Episcopius, 1566).Google Scholar
Whitman, James Q., The Legacy of Roman Law in the German Romantic Era (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Wichmann, Christian August, Über die natürlichsten Mittel die Frohn-Dienste bey Kammer- und Ritter-Güthern ohne Nachtheil der Grundherren aufzuheben (Leipzig: J. G. I. Breitkopf, Sohn und Comp, 1795).Google Scholar
Wickham, Chris, “Debate: The Feudal Revolution: IV” (1997) 155 Past & Present 196–208.Google Scholar
Wieacker, Franz, “Cicero und die Fachjurisprudenz seiner Zeit” (1978) 3 Ciceroniana 69–77.Google Scholar
Wieacker, Franz, History of Private Law in Europe: With Particular Reference to Germany, Tony Weir (trans.) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Wieacker, Franz, “Über das Verhältnis der römishen Fachjurisprudenz zur griechisch-hellenistischen Theorie” (1969) 20 Iura: rivista internazionale di diritto romano e antico 448–477.Google Scholar
Windscheid, Bernardo, Diritto delle Pandette: con note e riferimenti al diritto civile italiano, vol. I, Carlo Fadda and Paolo Emilio Bensa (trans.) (Turin: Unione Tipografico-Editrice, 1930).Google Scholar
Windscheid, Bernardo, Lehrbuch des Pandektenrechts, 6th ed., vol. 1 (Frankfurt: Rütten & Loening, 1887).Google Scholar
Wolfe, Martin, “Jean Bodin on Taxes: The Sovereignty-Taxes Paradox” (1968) 83(2) Political Science Quarterly 268–284.Google Scholar
Wolff, Hans Julius, Roman Law. An Historical Introduction (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1951).Google Scholar
Wood, Ellen Meiksins, Liberty and Property: A Social History of Western Political Thought from the Renaissance to Enlightenment (London: Verso, 2012).Google Scholar
Wood, Ellen Meiksins, The Pristine Culture of Capitalism: A Historical Essay on Old Regimes and Modern States (London: Verso, 1991).Google Scholar
Xifaras, Mikhail, “L’École de l’Exégèse: Est Elle Historique? Le Cas de Raymond-Théodore Troplong (1795–1869), Lecteur de Friedrich Carl von Savigny,” in Heinz, Mohnhaupt and Jean-François, Kervégan (eds.), Influences et Réceptions Mutuelles du Droit et de la Philosophie en France et en Allemagne (Frankfurt: Klostermann, 2001), 177–209.Google Scholar
Xifaras, Mikhail, “Ya-t-il une théorie de la propriété chez Pierre-Joseph Proudhon” (2004) 47 Corpus, Revue de philosophie 229–282.Google Scholar
Yavetz, Zvi, “Why Rome?: Zeitgeist and Ancient Historians in Early 19th Century Germany” (1976) 97(3) American Journal of Philology 276–296.Google Scholar
Zuiderhoek, Arjan, “Introduction: Land and Natural Resources in the Roman World in Historiographical and Theoretical Perspective,” in Erdkamp, Paul, Verboven, Koenraad, and Zuiderhoek, Arjan (eds.), Ownership and Exploitation of Land and Natural Resources in the Roman World 1–18 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar