Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-05T01:40:53.835Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 60 - Intrapartum Asphyxia and Its Sequelae

from Section 6 - Neonatal Problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2021

Tahir Mahmood
Affiliation:
Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy
Charles Savona Ventura
Affiliation:
University of Malta, Malta
Ioannis Messinis
Affiliation:
University of Thessaly, Greece
Sambit Mukhopadhyay
Affiliation:
Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital, UK
Get access

Summary

Asphyxia describes any condition that results in oxygen deprivation and, in the unborn or soon-to-be-born infant, may occur prenatally in utero, during delivery or postnatally [1]. In cases of intrapartum asphyxia, the duration of oxygen deprivation may vary and is critical to the ensuing insult to the infant’s vital organs and, especially, to the brain. Oxygen deficiency at tissue level (hypoxia, see Box 60.1) is often accompanied by glucose and nutrient deprivation, and is further compounded by pre-existing or complicating factors in the mother, especially pyrexia, and in the infant such as sepsis or congenital anomalies, the concomitant degree of metabolic derangement (e.g. extent of hypoglycaemia or metabolic acidosis), and the time to delivery and effective resuscitation. All of these factors will potentially compound any hypoxic injury and the extent of any ensuing brain damage, described as hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE, Box 60.1). Attempts to assign an HIE ‘grade’ may help to correlate early symptoms and signs with the degree and likelihood of long-term sequelae [2], although accurate prognostication of asphyxial brain damage remains difficult.

Type
Chapter
Information
The EBCOG Postgraduate Textbook of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Obstetrics & Maternal-Fetal Medicine
, pp. 477 - 485
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Long, M, Brandon, DH. Induced hypothermia for neonates with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy. J Obstet Gynaecol Neonatol Nurs. 2007;36:293–8.Google Scholar
Robertson, NR, Groenendaal, F. Neurological syndrome and encephalopathy scores. In Rennie and Roberton’s Textbook of Neonatology, 5th ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2012. pp. 1135–6.Google Scholar
Alfiveric, Z, Devane, D, Gyte, GM. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006Jul 19;(3):CD006066.Google Scholar
Rocha-Ferreira, E, Hristova, M. Plasticity in the neonatal brain following hypoxic-ischaemic injury. Neural Plast. 2016;2016:4901014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4901014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kurinczuk, J, White-Koning, M, Badwani, N. Epidemiology of neonatal encephalopathy and hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy. Early Hum Develop. 2010;86:329–38.Google Scholar
Badwani, N, Kurinczuk, JJ, Keogh, JM, et al. Intrapartum risk factors for newborn encephalopathy: the Western Australian case-control study. BMJ. 1998;317:1554.Google Scholar
Allen, KA, Brandon, DH. Hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy: Pathophysiology and experimental treatments. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev. 2011;11(3):125–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization. World Health Report: make every mother and child count. 2005.Google Scholar
Cross, KW. Resuscitation of the asphyxiated infant. Brit Med Bull. 1966;22:7378.Google Scholar
Dawes, G. Birth asphyxia, resuscitation and brain damage In Foetal and Neonatal Physiology. Chicago:Year Book Publisher; 1968; pp. 141–59.Google Scholar
Northington, FJ, Chavez-Valdez, R, Martin, LJ. Neuronal cell death in neonatal hypoxia-ischaemia. Ann Neurol. 2011;69(5):743–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salas, J, Tekes, A, Hwang, M, Northington, FJ, Huisman, TAGM. Head ultrasound in neonatal hypoxic-ischaemic injury and its mimickers for clinicians. A review of patterns of injury and the evolution of findings over time. Neonatology. 2018;114:185–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cabaj, A, Bekiesinska-Figatowska, M, Madzik, J. MRI patterns of hypoxic-ischaemic brain injury in preterm and full term infants – classical and less common MR findings. Pol J Radiol. 2012;77(3):71–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Apgar, V. A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the newborn infant. Anesth Analg (Clev). 1953;32:260–7.Google Scholar
Lie, KK, Groholt, EK, Eskild, A. Association between cerebral palsy and Apgar score in low and normal birthweight infants – a population-based cohort study. Br Med J. 2010;341:c4990.Google Scholar
Thompson, CM, Puterman, AS, Linley, LL, et al. The value of a scoring system for hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy in predicting neurodevelopmental outcome. Acta Paediatr. 1997 86;757–61.Google Scholar
LaRosa, D, Ellery, S, Walker, DW, Dickinson, H. Understanding the full spectrum of organ injury following intrapartum asphyxia. Front Pediatr. 2017;00016. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2017.00016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarnat, H, Sarnat, M. Neonatal encephalopathy following fetal distress. A clinical and electroencephalographic study. Arch Neurol. 1976;33:696705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levene, M, Sands, C, Grindulis, H, Moore, JR. Comparison of two methods of predicting outcome in perinatal asphyxia. Lancet. 1986;1:67–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Goodwin, TM, Belai, L, Hernandez, P, Durand, M, Paul, RH. Asphyxial complications in the term newborn with severe umbilical acidaemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;167:1506–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, JA, Kamlin, CO, Vento, M, et al. Defining the reference range for oxygen saturation for infants after birth. Pediatrics. 2010;125:e1340–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Azzopardi, D. Clinical management of the baby with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy. Semin Fetal Neonatol Med. 2010;86:345–50.Google Scholar
Thoresen, M, Penrice, J, Lorek, A, et al. Mild hypothermia after severe transient hypoxic-ischaemia ameliorates delayed cerebral energy failure in the newborn piglet. Pediatr Res. 1995;37:667–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A, Brocklehurst, P, Gunn, A, et al. Neurological outcomes at 18 months of age after moderate hypothermia for perinatal hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy: synthesis and meta-analysis of trial data. BMJ. 2010;340:c363. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c363Google Scholar
Rutherford, M, Ramenghi, L, Edwards, A, et al. Assessment of brain tissue injury after moderate hypothermia for perinatal hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy: a nested sub-study of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:3945.Google Scholar
Shankaran, S, Pappas, A, Laptook, AR, et al. Outcomes of safety and effectiveness in a multicentre trial of whole-body hypothermia for neonates with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy. Pediatr. 2008;122(4):e791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azzopardi, D, Robertson, NJ, Bainbridge, A, et al. Moderate hypothermia within 6 h of birth plus inhaled xenon versus moderate hypothermia alone after birth asphyxia (TOBY-Xe): a proof-of-concept, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(2):145–53.Google Scholar
Nair, J, Kumar, VHS. Current and emerging therapies in the management of hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy in neonates. Children. 2018;5(7):99.Google Scholar
Van Velthoven, CT, Kavelaars, A, van Bel, F, Heijnen, CJ. Repeated mesenchymal stem cell treatment after neonatal hypoxia-ischemia has distinct effects on formation and maturation of new neurons and oligodendrocytes leading to restoration of damage, corticospinal motor tract activity, and sensorimotor function. J Neurosci. 2010;30:9603–11.Google Scholar
Cowan, F. Outcome after intrapartum asphyxia in term infants. Semin Neonatol. 2000;5:127–40.Google Scholar
Azzopardi D, Strohm B, Linsell L, et al., on behalf of TOBY Register. Implementation and conduct of therapeutic hypothermia for perinatal asphyxia encephalopathy in the UK – analysis of National Data. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038504CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×