Aboh, Enoch Olade. 2009. Clause structure and verb series. Linguistic Inquiry 40: 1–33.Google Scholar

Ackema, Peter. 2006. Review of Yafei Li, X°: A theory of the morphological-syntax interface. Journal of Linguistics 42: 205–211.Google Scholar

Ahlner, Felix and Zlatev, Jordan. 2010. Cross-modal iconicity: A cognitive semiotic approach to sound symbolism. Sign Systems Studies 38: 298–348.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2006. Serial verb constructions in typological perspective. In Aikhenvald and Dixon, 1–68.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.). 2006. Serial verb constructions: A cross-linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aissen, Judith. 1987. Tzotzil clause structure. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar

Aissen, Judith. 1996. Pied-piping, abstract agreement, and functional projections in Tzotzil. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14: 447–491.Google Scholar

Aissen, Judith. 2003. Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 435–483.Google Scholar

Alexiadou, Artemis. 1997. Adverb placement: A case study in antisymmetric syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Alexiadou, Artemis and Anagnostopolou, E.. 2001. The subject-in-situ generalization and the role of case in driving computations. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 193–231.Google Scholar

Alsina, Alex. 1992. On the argument structure of causatives. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 517–556.Google Scholar

Anderson, Stephen. 1992. A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, Stephen. 1999. A formalist’s reading of some functionalist work in syntax. In Darnell et al., vol. 1, 111–136.Google Scholar

Atkins, P. W. 1994. The 2nd Law: Energy, chaos, and form. New York: Scientific American Books.Google Scholar

Babyonyshev, Maria 1997. Covert feature checking and conjunction agreement in Russian. Paper presented at 1997 Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics (FASL), University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar

Bach, Emmon. 1964. An introduction to transformational grammars. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar

Bach, Emmon. 1971. Questions. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 153–166.Google Scholar

Bach, Emmon. 1986. The algebra of events. Linguistics and Philosophy 9: 5–16.Google Scholar

Bachrach, Asaf and Katzir, Roni. 2009. Right-node raising and delayed spellout. In Grohmann, Kleanthes K. (ed.) Interphases: Phase-theoretic investigations of linguistic interfaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Baker, Brett and Harvey, Mark. 2010. Complex predicate formation. In Amberber, M., Baker, B. and Harvey, M. (eds.) Complex predicates: Cross-linguistic perspectives on event structure, 13–47. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Baker, Mark. 1989. Object sharing and projection in serial verbal construction. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 13–33.Google Scholar

Baker, Mark. 1996. The polysynthesis parameter. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Baker, Mark. 2001. The atoms of language: The mind’s hidden rules of grammar. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Baker, Mark. 2002. Building and merging, not checking. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 321–328.Google Scholar

Baker, Mark and Stewart, Osamyimen. 2002. A serial verb construction without construction. Ms. Rutgers University, New Jersey.Google Scholar

Barwise, Jon and Cooper, Robin. 2002. Generalized quantifiers and natural language. In Paul Portner and Barbara Partee (eds.) Form semantics: The essential readings, 75–126. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Bautista, Calixto Agüero. 2014. Weak crossover and the syntax–phonology interface. Berkeley Linguistics Society 40.Google Scholar

Belletti, Adriana. 2004. (ed.) Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Benmamoun, Elabbas. 1992. Functional and inflectional morphology: Problems of projection, representation and derivation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California.Google Scholar

Berwick, Robert and Chomsky, Noam. 2016. Why only us? Language and evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bickerton, Derek. 1990. Language and species. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Blevins, James. 1990. Syntactic complexity: Evidence for discontinuity and multi-domination. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar

Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar

Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2015. Distributed morphology. Ms. University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar

Boeckx, Cedric and Piattelli-Palmarini, Massimo. 2005. Language as a natural object, linguistics as a natural science. Linguistic Review 22: 447–466.Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight. 1977. The form of language. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight. 1982. Intonation and its parts. Language 58: 505–533.Google Scholar

Borer, Hagit. 2005. The normal course of events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Borer, Hagit. 2014. Wherefore roots? Theoretical Linguistics 40.3/4: 343–359.Google Scholar

Borer, Hagit. 2015. The category of roots. In Alexiadou, A., Borer, H. and Schafer, F. (eds.) The syntax of roots and the roots of syntax, 112–148. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bošković, Željko. 2002. On multiple wh-fronting. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 351–383.Google Scholar

Bošković, Željko. 2009. Unifying first and last conjunct agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27: 455–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bošković, Željko and Takahashi, Daiko. 1998. Scrambling and last resort. Linguistic Inquiry 29: 347–366.Google Scholar

Bowden, J. 2001. Taba: Description of a South Halmahera language. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Bowers, John. 1993. The syntax of predication. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 591–656.Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan and Moshi, Lioba. 1993. Object asymmetries in comparative Bantu syntax. In Sam A. Mchombo (ed.) Theoretical aspects of Bantu grammar, 47–91. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

Bruening, Benjamin. 2018. The lexicalist hypothesis: Both wrong and superfluous. Language 94: 1–42.Google Scholar

Byrne, Francis. 1985. Pro_prox in Saramaccan. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 313–320.Google Scholar

Carnie, Andrew. 2002. Syntax: A generative introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Carrier, Jill and Randall, Janet. 1992. The argument structure and syntactic structure of resultatives. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 173–134.Google Scholar

Carstens, Vicki. 2002. Antisymmetry and word order in serial constructions. Language 78: 3–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chao, Yuen-Ren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Chaves, Rui. 2012. On the grammar of extraction and coordination. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30: 465–512.Google Scholar

Chen, Zhe. 2017. The classification of Chinese adverbials, interrupted scopes and the nature of minimality in non-movement dependencies. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar

Chen, Zhe. in press. Probed by a modifier at the bottom of a clause. Journal of Chinese Linguistics.Google Scholar

Chen, Zhe and Yafei, Li. 2016. Looking at vP from the Chinese perspective. Foreign Language Teaching and Research 4: 483–497.Google Scholar

Chen, Zhe and Yafei, Li. 2021. Bipartite agentivity expression in Chinese passives. Syntax 24: 123–141.Google Scholar

Cheng, Lisa and Sybesma, Rint. 1999. Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 509–542.Google Scholar

Cheng, Lisa and Sybesma, Rint. 2005. Classifiers in four varieties of Chinese. In Cinque, Guglielmo and Kayne, Richard (eds.) Handbook of comparative syntax, 259–292. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Jacobs, R. and Rosenbaum, P. (eds.) Readings in English transformational grammar, 184–221. Waltham, MA: Ginn.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1982. Some concepts and consequences of the government-binding theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Martin, Roger, Michaels, David and Uriagereka, Juan (eds.) Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2001a. Derivation by phase. In Kenstowicz, Michael (ed.) Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2001b. Beyond explanatory adequacy. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 20.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2004a. Biolinguistics and the human capacity. Lecture at MTA, Budapest.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2004b. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Belletti, 104–131.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2007. Approaching UG from below. In Sauerland, Uli and Gärtner, Hans-Martin (eds.) Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomsky’s Minimalism and the View from Syntax-Semantics, 1–29. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2012. The science of language: Interviews with James McGilvrary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130: 33–49.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2015. Problems of projection: Extensions. In Di Domenico, Elisa, Hamann, Cornelia and Matteini, Simona (eds.) Structures, strategies and beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti, 3–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam and Lasnik, Howard. 1993. The theory of principles and parameters. In Jacobs, Joachim, von Stechow, Arnim, Sternefeld, Wolfgang and Vennemann, Theo (eds.) Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research, 506–569. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Christensen, Peer, Fusaroli, Riccardo and Kristian, Tylén. 2016. Environmental constraints shaping constituent order in emerging communication systems: Structural iconicity, interactive alignment and conventionalization. Cognition 146: 67–80.Google Scholar

Chung, Dae-Ho. 2004. Multiple dominance analysis of right node raising constructions. Language Research 40: 791–812.Google Scholar

Chung, Sandra. 1991. Functional heads and proper government in Chamorro. Lingua 85: 85–134.Google Scholar

Chung, Sandra and Ladusaw, William. 2004. Restriction and saturation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo and Rizzi, Luigi. 2010. The cartography of syntactic structures. In Heine, Bernd and Narrog, Keiko (eds.) The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 51–65. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Citko, Barbara. 2005. On the nature of merge: External merge, internal merge, and parallel merge. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 475–496.Google Scholar

Collins, Chris. 1997. Argument sharing in serial verb constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 461–497.Google Scholar

Couvee, Sascha and Pfau, Roland. 2018. Structure and grammaticalization of serial verb constructions in Sign Language of the Netherlands: A corpus-based study. Frontiers in Psychology 9: 993.Google Scholar

Creissels, Denis. 2016. Transitivity, valency and voice. Ms., European Summer School in Linguistic Typology, Porquerolles. www.deniscreissels.fr/public/Creissels-ESSLT.pdf.Google Scholar

Croft, William. 1990. Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Croft, William. 1991. Syntactic categories and grammatical relations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Croft, William. 1995. Autonomy and functionalist linguistics. Language 71: 490–532.Google Scholar

Croft, William. 1999. What (some) functionalists can learn from (some) formalists. In Darnell et al., vol 1, 87–110.Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2003. Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Culicover, Peter and Jackendoff, Ray. 2005. Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Darnell, Michael, Moravcsik, Edith, Noonan, Michael, Newmeyer, Frederick and Wheatley, Kathleen (eds.) 1999. Functionalism and formalism in linguistics, vols. 1–2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Deal, Amy Rose. 2013. Possessor raising. Linguistic Inquiry 44: 391–432.Google Scholar

Deal, Amy Rose. 2017. External possession and possessor raising. The Wiley Blackwell companion to syntax, 2nd edition. Wiley Online Library: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom047.Google Scholar

Déchaine, Rose-Marie. 1993. Serial verb constructions. In Jacobs, Joachim, von Stechow, Arnim, Sternefeld, Wolfgang and Vennemann, Theo (eds.) Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research, 799–825. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

de Vries, Mark. 2009. On multidominance and linearization. Biolinguistics 3.4: 344–403.Google Scholar

den Besten, Hans. 1983. On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. In Abrahams, Werner (ed.) On the formal syntax of the Westgermania, 47–131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

den Dikken, Marcel. 1999. On the structural representation of possession and agreement: The case of (anti-)agreement in Hungarian possessed Nominal Phrases. In István Kenesei (ed.) Crossing boundaries: Theoretical Advances in Central and Eastern European Languages, 137–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

den Dikken, Marcel. 2006. Relators and linkers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Deng, Dun. 2013. The syntax and semantics of event quantifiers in Mandarin Chinese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar

Di Sciullo, Anna Maria and Williams, Edwin. 1987. On the definition of word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Diesing, Molly. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Diessel, Holger. 2008. Iconicity of sequence: A corpus-based analysis of the positioning of temporal adverbial clauses in English. Cognitive Linguistics 19: 465–490.Google Scholar

Dik, Simon. 1968. Coordination: Its implications for the theory of general linguistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Dik, Simon. 1989. The theory of functional grammar, part 1: The structure of the clause. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Dingemanse, Mark, Blasi, Damian E., Lupyan, Gary, Christensen, Morten H. and Monaghan, Padraic. 2015. Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19: 603–615.Google Scholar

Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67: 547–619.Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 2013. Order of Subject, Object and Verb. In Matthew S. Dryer and Martin Haspelmath (eds.) The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/81.Google Scholar

Dye, Christina, Kedar, Yarden and Lust, Barbara. 2019. From lexical to functional categories: New foundations for the study of language development. First Language 39: 9–32.Google Scholar

Eckardt, Regina. 1995. Does information flow in event structures? In Groenendijk, Geroen (ed.) Ellipsis, underspecification, events and more in dynamic semantics, dyana-2 deliverable r2.2.c, 49–72. ILLC/Department of Philosophy, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Embick, David and Noyer, Rolf. 2001. Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 555–595.Google Scholar

Emonds, Joseph. 1978. The verb complex V′-V in French. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 151–175.Google Scholar

Emonds, Joseph. 1980. Word order in generative grammar. Journal of Linguistic Research 1: 33–54.Google Scholar

Emonds, Joseph. 1986. Grammatically deviant prestige constructions. In M. Brame, H. Contreras and Frederick Newmeyer (eds.) A Festschrift for Sol Saporta, 93–131. Seattle, WA: Noit Amrofer.Google Scholar

Enç, Mürvet. 1986. Toward a referential analysis of temporal expressions. Linguistics and Philosophy 9: 405–426.Google Scholar

Epstein, Samuel David. 1999. Un-principled syntax and the derivation of syntactic relations. In Epstein, Samuel David and Hornstein, Norbert (eds.) Working minimalism, 317–345. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Ernst, Thomas. 2002. The syntax of adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ernst, Thomas. 2014. The syntax of adverbs. In Andrew Carnie, Yosuke Sato and Daniel Saddiqi (eds.) The Routledge handbook of syntax, 108–130. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Feng, Shengli. 1995. GB theory and passive sentences in Chinese. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 1: 1–28.Google Scholar

Feng, Shengli. 2000. Prosodic syntax in Chinese. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press.Google Scholar

Fischer, O. C. M. 2006. Grammaticalization and iconicity: Two interacting processes. In H. Grabes and W. Viereck (eds.) The wider scope of English: Papers in English language and literature from the Bamberg Conference of the International Association of University Professors of English, 17-42. Bamberger Beiträge zur englischen Sprachwissenschaft; No. 51.Google Scholar

Fitch, W. Tecumseh, Hauser, Marc D. and Chomsky, Noam. 2005. The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications. Cognition 97: 179–210.Google Scholar

Foley, Williams. 1991. The Yimas languages and New Guinea. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Foley, Williams and Olson, Mike. 1985. Clausehood and verb serialization. In Nichols, J. and Woodbury, A. (eds.) Grammar inside and outside the clause: Some approaches to theory from the field, 17–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fortescue, Michael. 2014. The iconicity of lengthening and reduplicating suffixes in Nuuchahnulth. International Journal of American Linguistics 80: 533–552.Google Scholar

Frampton, John. 1990. Parasitic gaps and the theory of wh-chains. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 49–77.Google Scholar

Fu, Jingqi. 1994. On deriving Chinese derived nominals: Evidence for V-to-N raising. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar

Fukui, Naoki and Takano, Yuji. 1998. Symmetry in syntax: Merge and Demerge. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 7: 27–86.Google Scholar

Gärtner, Hans-Martin. 2003. On object-shift in Icelandic and partial iconicity. Lingua 114: 1235–1252.Google Scholar

Gavruseva, Elena. 2000. On the syntax of possessor extraction. Lingua 110: 743–772.Google Scholar

Gazdar, Gerald, Pullum, Geoffrey K., Sag, Ivan A. and Wasow, Thomas. 1982. Coordination and transformational grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 13.4: 663–676.Google Scholar

Gazdar, Gerald, Klein, Ewan H., Pullum, Geoffrey K. and Sag, Ivan A.. 1985. Generalized phrase structure grammar. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2000. Negative … concord? Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 457–523.Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 1990. Syntax: A functional-typological introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Gleason, Jean B. and Ratner, Nan B.. 2017. The development of language. Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele and Jackendoff, Ray. 2004. The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language 80: 532–568.Google Scholar

Goodall, Grant. 1987. Parallel structures in syntax: Coordination, causatives and restructuring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Grano, Thomas. 2012. Mandarin hen and universal markedness in gradable adjectives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30: 513–565.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Greenberg, Joseph (ed.) Universals of language, 73–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Grimshaw, Jane. 2000. Locality and extended projection. In Coopmans, Peter, Everaert, Martin and Grimshaw, Jane (eds.) Lexical specification and insertion, 115–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Guo, Jimao. 1999. Pondering the object of intransitive verbs. Chinese Language Studies 270: 337–346.Google Scholar

Haegeman, Liliane. 1991. Introduction to government and binding theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Haiman, John. 1980. The iconicity of grammar: Isomorphism and motivation. Language 56: 515–540.Google Scholar

Haiman, John. 1983. Iconic and economic motivation. Language 59: 781–819.Google Scholar

Haiman, John. 1985. Natural syntax: Iconicity and erosion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Haiman, John. 2008. In defense of iconicity. Cognitive Linguistics 19: 35–48.Google Scholar

Hajek, John. 2006. Serial verbs in Tetun Dili. In Aikhenvald and Dixon, 239–253.Google Scholar

Hale, Kenneth. 1991. Misumalpan verb sequencing constructions. In Lefebvre, 1–36. http://lingphil.mit.edu/papers/hale/papers/hale041.pdf.Google Scholar

Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, Samuel Jay. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In Hale, K. and Keyser, S. J. (eds.) The view from Building 20, 53–109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, Samuel Jay. 2002. Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Halle, Morris and Marantz, Alec. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, Samuel J. (eds.) The view from Building 20, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Harley, Heidi. 2005. How do verbs get their names? Denominal verbs, manner incorporation and the ontology of verb roots in English. In Erteschik-Shir, Nomi and Rapoport, Tova (eds.) The syntax of aspect, 42–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2003. Against iconicity and markedness. Talk given at Stanford University.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2008. Frequency vs. iconicity in explaining grammatical asymmetries. Cognitive Linguistics 19: 1–33.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2016. The serial verb construction: Comparative concepts and cross- linguistic generalizations. Language and Linguistics 17: 291–319.Google Scholar

Hauser, Marc D., Chomsky, Noam and Tecumseh Fitch, W.. 2002. The language faculty: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298: 1569–1579.Google Scholar

Hawkins, John. 1990. A parsing theory of word order universals. Language 21.2: 223–261.Google Scholar

He, Chuansheng and Tan, Dandan. 2019. On the constituency of the numeral-classifier cluster in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 20: 335–360.Google Scholar

Henderson, Brent. 2007. Matching and raising unified. Lingua 117: 202–220.Google Scholar

Her, One-Soon. 2017. Structure of numerals and classifiers in Chinese: Historical and typological perspectives and cross-linguistic implications. Language and Linguistics. 18.1: 26–71.Google Scholar

Her, One-Soon and Tsai, Hui-Chin. 2020. Left is right, right is not: On the constituency of the classifier phrase in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 21: 1–32.Google Scholar

Heycock, Caroline. 1993. Syntactic predication in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 2: 167–211.Google Scholar

Higginbotham, James. 1985. On semantics. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 547–593.Google Scholar

Hiraiwa, Ken and Bodomo, Adams. 2008. Object-sharing as symmetric sharing: Predicate clefting and serial verbs in Dagaare. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26: 795–832.Google Scholar

Hofherr, Patricia Cabredo. 2003. Inflected complementizers and the licensing of non-referential pro-drop. In Griffin, W. E. (ed.) The role of agreement in natural language: TLS 5 proceedings, 47–58. Texas Linguistics Forum.Google Scholar

Hornstein, Norbert and Weinberg, Amy. 1981. Case theory and preposition stranding. Linguistic Inquiry 12: 55–91.Google Scholar

Hornstein, Norbert and Weinberg, Amy. 1990. The necessity of LF. The Linguistic Review 7: 129–167.Google Scholar

Huang, James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar

Huang, James. 1989. Pro-drop in Chinese: A generalized control theory. In Jaeggli, Osvaldo and Safir, Kenneth (eds.) The null subject parameter, 185–214. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Huang, James, Audrey, Li and Yafei, Li. 2009. The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Huang, Shuping and Su, Lily I-wen. 2005. Iconicity as evidence in Saisiyat linguistic coding of causative events. Oceanic Linguistics 44: 341–356.Google Scholar

Husband, E. Matthew. 2010. On the compositional nature of stativity. Ph.D. dissertation, Michigan State University.Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray and Pinker, Steven. 2005. The nature of language faculty and its implications for evolution of language. Cognition 97: 211–225.Google Scholar

Jansen, Bert, Koopman, Hilda and Muysken, Pieter. 1978. Serial verbs in the creole languages. Amsterdam Creole Studies 2: 125–159.Google Scholar

Johannessen, Janne. 1998. Coordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Julien, Marit. 2000. Syntactic heads and word formation. Ph.D dissertation, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar

Kaiser, Lizanne. 1999. Representing the structure-discourse iconicity of the Japanese post-verbal construction. In Darnell, Michael et al. (eds.) Functionalism and formalism in linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Kandybowicz, Jason. 2006. Conditions on multiple copy spell-out and the syntax phonology interface. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard. 1984. Connectedness and binary branching. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kiss, Katalin É. 2002. The syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Koopman, Hilda. 1984. The syntax of verbs: From verb movement rules in the Kru languages to Universal Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Koopman, Hilda and Sportiche, Dominique. 1982. Variables and the bijection principle. In Kaye, J., Koopman, H. and Sportiche, D. (eds.) Projet sur les langues kru: Premier rapport, 176–202. Montreal: University du Quebec at Montreal.Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from the verb. In Rooryck, Johan and Zaring, Laurie (eds.) Phrase structure and the lexicon, 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika. 2002. The event argument and the semantics of verbs. Berkeley, CA: Bepress.Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika. 2004. Building resultatives. Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst. http://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/GY4ZThjZ/Building%20Resultatives.pdf.Google Scholar

Kuno, Susumu. 1987. Functional syntax: Anaphora, discourse and empathy. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1986. Frame semantic control of the coordinate structure constraint. In Anne M. Farley, Peter T. Farley and Karl-Erik McCullough (eds.) Papers from the Chicago Linguistic Society 22, Part 2, 152–167.Google Scholar

Landsberg, Marge E. (ed.) 1995. Syntactic iconicity and linguistic freezes: The human dimension. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Larson, Richard. 1988. On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335–392.Google Scholar

Larson, Richard. 1991. Some issues in verb serialization. In Lefebvre 1991a, 185–210.Google Scholar

Larson, Richard. 2014. On shell structure. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Larson, Richard. 2018. AP-de adverbs in Mandarin. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 39.1: 1–28.Google Scholar

Lasnik, Howard and Saito, Mamoru. 1992. Move α: Conditions on its application and output? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Law, Paul and Veenstra, Tonjes. 1992. On the structure of serial verb constructions. Linguistic Analysis 22: 185–217.Google Scholar

Le Bruyn, Bert and Henriëtte, de Swart. 2014. Bare coordination: The semantic shift. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 32: 1205–1246.Google Scholar

LeDoux, Joseph. 1996. The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Lefebvre, Claire (ed.). 1991a. Serial verbs: Grammatical, comparative and cognitive approaches. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Lefebvre, Claire. 1991b. Take serial verbs in Fon. In Lefebvre, 37–78.Google Scholar

Levin, Beth and Rappaport-Hovav, Malka. 1995. Unaccusativity 1991a. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Li, Audrey Y.-H. 1990. Order and constituency in Mandarin Chinese. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Li, Audrey. Y.-H. 1999. Plurality in a classifier language. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 8: 75–99.Google Scholar

Li, Charles and Thompson, Sandra. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Li, Xu Ping. 2013. Numeral classifiers in Chinese: The syntax–semantics interface. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Li, Yafei. 1987. Case in categorial terms. General exam paper, MIT.Google Scholar

Li, Yafei. 1990a. Conditions on X°-movement. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar

Li, Yafei. 1990b. X°-binding and verb incorporation. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 399–426.Google Scholar

Li, Yafei. 1990c. On V-V compounds in Chinese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8: 177–207.Google Scholar

Li, Yafei. 1991. On deriving serial verb constructions. In Lefebvre 1991a, 103–136.Google Scholar

Li, Yafei. 1993. Structural head and aspectuality. Language 69: 480–504.Google Scholar

Li, Yafei. 1995. The thematic hierarchy and causativity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13: 255–282.Google Scholar

Li, Yafei. 1997. An optimized UG and biological redundancies. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 170–178.Google Scholar

Li, Yafei. 1999. Cross-componential causativity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17: 445–497.Google Scholar

Li, Yafei. 2005. X°: A theory of the morphology–syntax interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Li, Yafei. 2009. The syntactic structure of coordination and the significance of marginal data. Contemporary Linguistics 11: 289–298.Google Scholar

Li, Yafei. 2014. Placing Chinese morphemes in a coordinate system: Reflecting on the scientific nature of linguistic theorization. Language and Linguistics 15: 89–113.Google Scholar

Li, Yafei. 2015. Revisiting the internal structure of Chinese noun phrases. Chinese Language Studies 365: 99–104.Google Scholar

Li, Yafei. 2017. Universal direction of sentence-generation and three odd cases of wh- movement: An entropic perspective. Contemporary Linguistics 19: 159–180.Google Scholar

Li, Yafei and Chen, Zhe. 2018. What can biolinguistics learn from biology? Foreign Language Teaching and Research 50: 323–341.Google Scholar

Li, Yafei and Ting, Jen. 2013. Is UG like a chunk of Swiss cheese? Evidence for a “third-factor principle”. Language and Linguistics 14: 737–754.Google Scholar

Li, Yafei, Shields, Rebecca and Lin, Vivian. 2012. Adverb classes and the nature of minimality. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30: 217–260.Google Scholar

Lin, T.-H. Jonah. 2001. Light verb syntax and the theory of phrase structure. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar

Link, Godehard. 1998. Algebraic semantics in language and philosophy. CSLI Lecture Notes, vol. 74.Google Scholar

Liu, Chen Sheng. 2013. Reduplication of adjectives in Chinese: A default state. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 22: 101–132.Google Scholar

Lord, Carol. 1974. Causative constructions in Yorùbá. Studies in African Linguistics, Supplement 5: 195–204.Google Scholar

Lü, Shuxiang. 1984. Xiandai hanyu babai ci. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar

Marantz, Alec. 1984. On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Marantz, Alec. 1989. Clitics and phrase structure. In Baltin, Mark and Kroch, Anthony (eds.) Alternative conceptions of phrase structure, 99–116. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Marantz, Alec. 1993. Implications of asymmetries in double object constructions. In Mchombo, Sam A. (ed.) Theoretical aspects of Bantu grammar, 113–150. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. UPenn Working Papers in Linguistics 4.2: 201–225.Google Scholar

Massam, Diane. 2001. Pseudo noun incorporation in Niuean. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 153–197.Google Scholar

May, Robert. 1977. The grammar of quantification. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar

Mayr, Ernst. 1997. This is biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

McCawley, James. 1982. Parentheticals and discontinuous constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 91–106.Google Scholar

McCloskey, James. 1996. Subjects and subject position in Irish. In Borsley, R. and Roberts, Ian (eds.) The syntax of the Celtic languages, 241–283. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mei, Kuang. 1980. Is Modern Chinese really a SOV language? Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 7: 23–45.Google Scholar

Meir, Irit, Padden, Carol, Aronoff, Mark and Sandler, Wendy. 2013. Competing iconicities in the structure of languages. Cognitive Linguistics 24: 309–343.Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. 1988. The grammaticalization of coordination. In Haiman, J. and Thompson, S.A. (eds.) Clause combining in grammar and discourse, 331–359. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Miyagawa, Shigeru, Berwick, Robert and Okanoya, Kazuo. 2013. The emergence of hierarchical structure in human language. Frontiers in Psychology 4: 71–77.Google Scholar

Miyagawa, Shigeru, Ojima, Shiro, Berwick, Robert and Okanoya, Kazuo. 2014. The integration hypothesis of human language evolution and the nature of contemporary languages. Frontiers in Psychology 5: 564–570.Google Scholar

Moltmann, Friederike. 1992. Coordination and comparatives. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar

Müller, Stefan. 2013. Unifying everything: Some remarks on simpler syntax, construction grammar, minimalism and HPSG. Language 89: 920–950.Google Scholar

Munn, Alan. 1993. Topics in the syntax and semantics of coordinate structures. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar

Murane, Elizabeth. 1974. Daga grammar: From morpheme to discourse. Summer Institute of Linguistics Publications in Linguistics and related Fields 43. Norman, OK: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar

Muysken, Pieter. 1988. Parameters for serial verbs. In Manfredi, Victor (ed.) Niger-Congo syntax and semantics, vol. I, 65–75. Boston, MA: Boston University African Studies Center.Google Scholar

Newmeyer, Frederick. 1992. Iconicity and generative grammar. Language 68: 756–796.Google Scholar

Newmeyer, Frederick. 1998. Language form and language function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Newmeyer, Frederick. 2004. Some thoughts on the serial verb construction. Paris: Fédération TUL. www.typologie.cnrs.fr/fr/gabarits/06a_ates-colloques.php.Google Scholar

Newmeyer, Frederick. 2017. Form and function in the evolution of grammar. Cognitive Science 41: 259–276.Google Scholar

Nida, Eugene. 1949. Morphology: The descriptive analysis of words. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Nikolaeva, Irina. 2002. The Hungarian external possessor in a European perspective. In Hasselblatt, C. and Blokland, R. (eds.) Finno-Ugrians and Indo-Europeans: Linguistic contacts. Maastricht: Shaker. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.452.3412&rep=rep1&type=pdf.Google Scholar

Nishiyama, Kunio. 1998. V-V compounds as serialization. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 7: 175–217.Google Scholar

Nishiyama, Kunio. 1999. Adjectives and the copulas in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 8: 183–222.Google Scholar

Nunes, Jairo. 2001. Sideward movement. Linguistic Inquiry 31: 303–344.Google Scholar

Nunes, Jairo. 2004. Linearization of chains and sideward movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Oomen, Marloes. 2017. Iconicity in argument structure: Psych-verbs in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Sign Language & Linguistics 20: 55–108.Google Scholar

Pacchiarotti, Sara. 2017. Bantu applicative construction types involving *-id: Form, functions and diachrony. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oregon.Google Scholar

Partee, Barbara. 1986. Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. In Groenendijk, J., de Jong, D. and Stokhof, M. (eds.) Studies in discourse representation theories and the theory of generalized quantifiers, 115–144. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1867/1931. On a new list of categories. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 7: 287–98. Reprinted in Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss (eds.) Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. 1: Principles of philosophy, 287–305. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1902/1932. The icon, index, and symbol. In Hartshorne, Charles and Weiss, Paul (eds.) Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. 2: Elements of logic, 156–73. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Perniss, Pamela and Vigliocco, Gabriella. 2014. The bridge of iconicity: From a world of experience to the experience of language. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 369: 1–13.Google Scholar

Perniss, Pamela, Thompson, Robin L. and Vigliocco, Gabriella. 2010. Iconicity as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology 1: 1–15.Google Scholar

Perry, Lynne K., Perlman, Marcus and Lupyan, Gary. 2015. Iconicity in English and Spanish and its relation to lexical category and age of acquisition. PLoS One 10(9): e0137147.Google Scholar

Pesetsky, David. 1982. Paths and categories. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Pesetsky, David and Torrego, Esther. 2007. The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Karimi, Simin, Samiian, Vida and Wilkins, Wendy (eds.) Phrasal and clausal architecture, 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Peterson, Carole. 1986/2008. Semantic and pragmatic uses of “but”. Journal of Chinese Language 13.3: 583–590. (Published online by Cambridge University Press in 2008.)Google Scholar

Phillips, Collin. 2003. Linear order and constituency. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 37–90.Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven and Bloom, Paul. 1990. Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13: 707–784.Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven and Jackendoff, Ray. 2005. The faculty of language: What’s special about it? Cognition 95: 201–236.Google Scholar

Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424.Google Scholar

Postal, Paul. 1998. Three investigations of extraction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Postal, Paul. 2003. (Virtual) conceptual necessity. Journal of Linguistics 39: 599–620.Google Scholar

Progovac, Ljiljana. 1998. Structure for coordination. Glot International 3.7-8: 3–9.Google Scholar

Progovac, Ljiljana. 2000. Coordination, c-command and “logophoric” n-words. In Horn, Laurence and Kato, Yasuhiko (eds.) Studies in negation and polarity, 88–114. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Progovac, Ljiljana. 2003. Structure for coordination. In Cheng, Lisa and Sybesma, Rint (eds.) The second GLOT international state-of-the-article book: The latest in linguistics, 241–288. The Hague: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Progovac, Ljiljana. 2016. Review of Why only us? Language 92: 992–996.Google Scholar

Pustejovky, James. 1995. The generative lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Pylkkänen, Liina. 2008. Introducing arguments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Ramchand, Gillian. 2008. Verb meaning and the lexicon: A first phase syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Reinhart, Tanya. 1998. Wh-in situ in the framework of the minimalist program. Natural Language Semantics 6: 29–56.Google Scholar

Reinhart, Tanya. 2006. Interface strategies: Optional and costly computations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Haegeman, Lillian (ed.) Elements of grammar, 281–337. Amsterdam: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 2004. Locality and left periphery. In Belletti, 223–251.Google Scholar

Roberts, Ian. 2001. Head movement. In Baltin, Mark and Collins, Chris (eds.) The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, 114–147. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Rosen, Sara. 1989. Two types of noun-incorporation: A lexical analysis. Language 65: 294–317.Google Scholar

Ross, John R. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar

Ross, John R. 1972. The category squish: Endstation hauptwort. Chicago Linguistic Society 8: 316–328.Google Scholar

Rossion, Bruno, Hanseeuw, Bernard and Dricot, Laurence. 2012. Defining face perception areas in the human brain: A large scale factorial fMRI face localizer analysis. Brain and Cognition 79: 138–157.Google Scholar

Rothstein, Susan. 1999. Fine-grained structure in the eventuality domain: The semantics of predicative adjective phrases and be. Natural Language Semantics 7: 347–420.Google Scholar

Rudin, Catherine. 1988. On multiple questions and multiple wh fronting. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 445–501.Google Scholar

Sadock, Jerrold M. 1985. Autolexical syntax: A proposal for the treatment of noun incorporation and similar phenomena. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 379–439.Google Scholar

Sag, Ivan. 2000. Another argument against wh-trace. In Sandy Chung, Jim McCloskey and Nathan Sanders (eds.) Jorge Hankamer Webfest. https://babel.ucsc.edu/jorgewebfest/sag.html.Google Scholar

Schwartz, Bonnie. 1985. Case and conjunction. Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics 10: 161–186.Google Scholar

Schwarz, Florian. 2012. Situation pronouns in determiner phrases. Natural Language Semantics 20: 431–475.Google Scholar

Sebba, Mark. 1987. Syntax of serial verbs: An investigation into serialization in Sranan and other languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Shlonsky, Ur. 1997. Clause structure and word order in Hebrew and Arabic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Simpson, Andrew. 2002. On the status of “modifying” DE and the structure of the Chinese DP. In Tang, Sze-Wing and Liu, Chen-Sheng Luther (eds.) On the formal way to Chinese languages, 74–101. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

Sober, Elliott. 2015. Ockham’s razor: A user’s manual. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Song, Hongkyu. 2005. Causatives and resultatives in Korean. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar

Sproat, Richard. 1985. Welsh syntax and VSO structure. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 173–216.Google Scholar

Stahlke, Herbert. 1970. Serial verbs. Studies in African Linguistics 1: 60–99.Google Scholar

Stewart, John. 1963. Some restrictions on objects in Twi. Journal of African Languages 1: 145–149.Google Scholar

Stowell, Tim. 1981. Elements of phrase structure. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar

Sun, Tianqi. 2010. A study on the licensing pattern and mechanism of non-core arguments in Mandarin Chinese. Ph.D. dissertation, Peking University, Beijing.Google Scholar

Sun, Tianqi and Yafei, Li. 2010. Licensing non-core arguments in Chinese. Chinese Language Studies 334: 21–33.Google Scholar

Sun, Tianqi and Yafei, Li. 2020. An analysis on the mechanism of oblique object constructions in Chinese: The monosyllabic constraint and the “bare root” theory. Contemporary Linguistics 22.2: 199–216.Google Scholar

Svenonius, Peter. 2004. On the edge. In Adger, David, de Cat, Cécile and Tsoulas, George (eds.) Peripheries, 259–287. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Szabolcsi, Anna. 1983. The possessor that ran away from home. The Linguistic Review 3: 89–102.Google Scholar

Szabolcsi, Anna. 1992. Subject suppression or lexical PRO? The case of derived nominals in Hungarian. Lingua 86: 149–176.Google Scholar

Szabolcsi, Anna. 1994. The noun phrase. In Kiefer, Ferenc and Kiss, Katalan É. (eds.) The syntactic structure of Hungarian: Syntax and semantics 27, 179–274. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Tai, James. 1985. Temporal sequence and Chinese word order. In Haiman, John (ed.) Iconicity in syntax, 49–72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Tan, Dandan and Yafei, Li. 2020. What don’t tell us (much) about the structure of classifiers as one would hope? Ms., Hunan University and the University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar

Tang, Jane C.-C. 1990. Chinese phrase structure and the extended X′-theory. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar

Tellier, Christine. 1991 Licensing theory and French parasitic gaps. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Thomas, James. 1993. Thinking about genetic redundancy. Trends in Genetics 9: 396–399.Google Scholar

Ting, Jen. 1995. A non-uniform analysis of the passive construction in Mandarin Chinese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Rochester, New York.Google Scholar

Ting, Jen and Li, Yafei. 1997. Manner de and resultative de. Paper presented at the Conference of the International Association of Chinese Linguistics, University of Leiden.Google Scholar

Tomioka, Naoko. 2003. The lexicalization patterns of verbs and V-V compounds. In The proceedings of TROSS 03. Trondheim: Norges teknisk naturvitenskapelige universitet.Google Scholar

Tomlin, Russell. 1986. Basic word order: Functional principles. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Travis, Lisa. 1984. Parameters and effects of word order variation. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar

Uriagereka, Juan. 1998. Rhyme and reason. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

van Langendonck, Willy. 2010. Iconicity. In Geeraerts, Dirk and Cuyckens, Hubert (eds.) The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics. (Online publication) Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

van Leynseele, Hélène. 1975. Restrictions on serial verb constructions in Anyi. Journal of West African Languages 10: 189–217.Google Scholar

van Riemsdijk, Henk. 2006. Free relatives. In Everaert, Martin and van Riemsdijk, Henk (eds.) The Blackwell companion to syntax, vol. II, 338–382. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Veenstra, Tonjes. 1996. Serial verbs in Saramaccan: Predication and creole genesis. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar

Webelhuth, Gert. 1992. Principles and parameters of syntactic saturation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wellwood, Alexis. 2016. States and events for S-level gradable adjectives. Proceedings of SALT 26: 166–184.Google Scholar

Wexler, Kenneth. 2017. A program for the genetics of grammar. Biolinguistics 11: 295–323.Google Scholar

Wexler, Kenneth and Culicover, Peter. 1980. Formal principles of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Wilder, Chris. 2008. Shared constituents and linearization. In Johnson, Kyle (ed.) Topics in ellipsis, 229–258. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Williams, Edwin. 1978. Across-the-board rule application. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 31–43.Google Scholar

Williams, Edwin. 1980. Predication. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 203–238.Google Scholar

Williams, Edwin. 1981. Argument structure and morphology. Linguistic Review 1: 81–114.Google Scholar

Williamson, Kay. 1965. A grammar of the Kolokuma dialect of Ijo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Winter, Bodo, Perlman, Marcus, Perry, Lynn and Lupyan, Gary. 2017. Which words are most iconic? Iconicity in English sensory words. Interaction Studies 18: 433–454.Google Scholar

Wurmbrand, Susi. 2011. On agree and merge. Course notes. University of Connecticut.Google Scholar

Xing, Fuyi. 1991. On the phenomenon of object-replacement in Chinese. Chinese Teaching in the World 2: 76–84.Google Scholar

Yang, Charles. 2013. Ontogeny and phylogeny of language. Proceedings of the Natural Academy of Sciences 110.16: 6324–6327.Google Scholar

Yang, Yongzhong. 2007. The syntax of NP in V+NP. Language Studies 2: 58–65.Google Scholar

Yngve, Victor. 1960. A model and a hypothesis for language structure. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 104: 444–466.Google Scholar

Zhang, Niina. 2010. Coordination in syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Zhang, Niina. 2018. Non-canonical objects as event kind-classifying element. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 36: 1395–1437.Google Scholar

Zhang, Yunqiu. 2004. A study on patient object sentences in Chinese. Shanghai: Xuelin Press.Google Scholar

Zoerner, Ed. 1995. Coordination: The syntax of &P. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar

Zwart, Jan-Wouter. 2005. Some notes on coordination in head-final languages. Linguistics in the Netherlands 2005: 231–242.Google Scholar