Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-31T13:59:49.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 6.1 - Quality in Medical Education

from Section 6 - Gathering feedback and quality improvement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2022

By
Dr Genevieve Holt  and
Dr Miranda Kronfli
Edited by
Patrick Hughes  and
Julie Langan Martin
Patrick Hughes
Affiliation:
NHS Forth Valley
Julie Langan Martin
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow
Get access

Summary

This chapter aims to equip those involved in the design and delivery of learning and teaching interventions, whatever their level or type of involvement in undergraduate education, with an understanding of some of the basic principles and practices of quality in medical education. We will share some useful tools for your practice to help you to frame useful questions, and to use them to help in your pursuit of quality in your teaching learning and assessment endeavours in undergraduate education and in disseminating your work.

Type
Chapter
Information
Teaching Psychiatry to Undergraduates , pp. 144 - 149
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Academy of Medical Educators. (2015). About AoME. Available at: www.medicaleducators.org/About-AoME (accessed 5 July 2020).Google Scholar
Association for Medical Education in Europe. (2020). About AMEE. Available at: https://amee.org/what-is-amee (accessed 5 July 2020).Google Scholar
Association of University Teachers of Psychiatry. (2020). What is the AUTP. Available at: https://www.autp.org/home (accessed 4 April 2022).Google Scholar
Biggs, J. B. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
Bleakley, A., Browne, J., and Ellis, K. (2013). Quality in medical education. In Swanwick, T., Forrest, K., and O’ Brien, B. C. (eds), Understanding Medical Education: Evidence, Theory, and Practice (pp. 47–59), 2nd ed. Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/978111847n.d61.ch4.Google Scholar
British Medical Association (2020). Widening Participation in Medicine. Available at: https://www.bma.org.uk/advice-and-support/studying-medicine/becoming-a-doctor/widening-participation-in-medicine#:~:text=Widening%20participation%20 (WP)%20is%20a,from%20low%20socio%2Deconomic%20groups (accessed 1 November 2020).Google Scholar
Cardoso, S., Rosa, M. J., and Stensaker, B. (2016). Why quality in higher education institutions is not achieved? The view of academics. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41: 950–65.Google Scholar
Cardoso, S., Rosa, M. J., Videira, P., and Amaral, A. (2019). Internal quality assurance: A new culture or added bureaucracy? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44 (2): 249–62.Google Scholar
Crampton, P., Mehdizadeh, L., Page, M., Knight, L., and Griffin, A. (2019). Realist evaluation of UK medical education quality assurance. BMJ Open, 9 (12): e033614.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W., 2014. A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE publications.Google Scholar
Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Stalmeijer, R., Van Berkel, H., and Wolfhagen, I. H. A. P. (2011). Quality assurance of teaching and learning: Enhancing the quality culture. In Dornan, T, Mann, K. V, Scherpbier, A. J, and Spencer, J. A (eds.), Medical Education: Theory and Practice (pp. 257–64). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingston, Elsevier Ltd.Google Scholar
European University Association. (2006). Quality Culture in European Universities: A bottom-up approach: Report on the three rounds of the Quality Culture project 2002–2006. Available at: https://eua.eu/resources/publications/656:quality-culture-in-european-universities-a-bottom-up-approach.html (accessed 4 April 2022).Google Scholar
Frye, A. W. and Hemmer, P. A. (2012). Program evaluation models and related theories: AMEE guide no. 67. Medical Teacher, 34 (5): e288–e299.Google Scholar
General Medical Council. (2013). Good Medical Practice. Available at: www.gmc-uk.org/ethical-guidance/ethical-guidance-for-doctors/good-medical-practice (accessed 4 April 2022).Google Scholar
General Medical Council. (2015). Promoting excellence: standards for medical education and training. Available at: www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/Promoting_excellence___guide_for_stakeholders.pdf_63751869.pdf (accessed 4 April 2022).Google Scholar
Greene, L. and Prostko, C. R. (2010). Educational Needs Assessment, Activity Development, and Outcomes Assessment at PRIME: Applications of Established Conceptual Frameworks and Principles of Adult Learning. Available at: https://primece.com/science-of-cme/adult-learning-principles/ (accessed 5 July 2020).Google Scholar
Griffin, A. and Cook, V. (2009). Acting on evaluation: Twelve tips from a national conference on student evaluations. Medical Teacher, 31 (2): 101–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haji, F., Morin, M. P., and Parker, K. (2013). Rethinking programme evaluation in health professions education: Beyond ‘did it work?’ Medical Education, 47 (4): 342–51.Google Scholar
Harvey, L. and Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18 (1): 9–34.Google Scholar
Healey, M., Flint, A., and Harrington, K. 2014. Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/resources/engagement_through_partnership.pdf (accessed 4 April 2022).Google Scholar
Health Foundation. (2013). Quality Improvement Made Simple: What Everyone Should Know About Quality Improvement. Available at: www.health.org.uk/sites/default/files/QualityImprovementMadeSimple.pdf (accessed 24th October 2020).Google Scholar
Holt, G., Ryland, H., and Shah, A. (2017). Quality improvement for psychiatrists. British Journal of Psychiatry Advances, n.d, 206–14.Google Scholar
Jorm, C. and Roberts, C. (2018). Using complexity theory to guide medical school evaluations. Academic Medicine, 93 (3): 399–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kenwright, D. N. and Wilkinson, T. (2018). Quality in medical education. In Swanwick, T., Forrest, K., and O’ Brien, B. C. (eds), Understanding Medical Education: Evidence, Theory, and Practice (pp. 101–10), 2nd ed. Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, D. (1967). Evaluation of training. In Craig, R. L. and Bittel, L. R., eds. Training and Development Handbook. New York: McGraw‐Hill, 87–112.Google Scholar
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development (Vol. I). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Lovato, C. and Peterson, L. (2018). Programme evaluation. In Swanwick, T., Forrest, K., and O’ Brien, B. C. (eds), Understanding Medical Education: Evidence, Theory, and Practice (pp. 443), 2nd ed. Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119373780.ch30.Google Scholar
Mayhew, E. (2019). Hearing everyone in the feedback loop: Using the new discussion platform, Unitu, to enhance the staff and student dialogue. European Political Science, 18 (4): 714–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. E. (1990). The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Academic Medicine, 65 (9): S63–7.Google Scholar
Rees, E. and Woolf, K. (2020). Selection in context: The importance of clarity, transparency and evidence in achieving widening participation goals. Medical Education, 54 (1): 8–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Selecting for Excellence Executive Group. (2014). Selecting for excellence final report. Available at: www.medschools.ac.uk/media/1203/selecting-for-excellence-final-report.pdf (accessed 01 November 2020).Google Scholar
Vroeijenstijn, A. I. (1995). Quality assurance in medical education. Academic Medicine, 70 (7 Suppl): S59–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, G., Greenhalgh, T., Westhorp, G., and Pawson, R. (2011). Realist methods in medical education research: What are they and what can they contribute? Medical Education 46 (1): 89–96.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×