References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 September 2021
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Properties of LawModern Law and After, pp. 287 - 292Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Alexy, R. (2002). A Theory of Constitutional Rights, translated by Rivers, J., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alexy, R. (2003). The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism, translated by Paulsen, B. L. and Paulsen, S. L., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benda-Beckmann, F. von (2002). Who’s Afraid of Legal Pluralism. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 34(47), 37–82.Google Scholar
Bennett, T. W. (2011). An African Doctrine of Equity in South African Public Law. Loyola Law Review, 57(4), 709–726.Google Scholar
Berger, P. L., and Luckman, T. (1967). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Black, J. (2002). Critical Reflections on Regulation. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy, 27(1), 1–35.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brennan, G., Eriksson, L., Goodin, R. E., and Southwood, N. (2013). Explaining Norms, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Büthe, T., and Mattli, W. (2011). The New Global Rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cantero Gamito, M. (2020). The Role of the EU in the Transnational Governance of Standards, Contracts and Codes, in Cantero Gamito, M. and Micklitz, H.-W., eds., The Role of the EU in Transnational Legal Ordering: Standards, Contracts and Codes, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2–26.Google Scholar
Christodoulidis, E. (2020). The Myth of Democratic Governance, in Kjaer, P. F., ed., The Law of Political Economy: Transformation in the Function of Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 62–88.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. E. (2019). Between Truth and Power: The Legal Constructions of Informational Capitalism, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. ([1893] 1984). The Division of Labour in Society, translated by Halls, W. D., with an introduction by Coser, Lewis, Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Eriksen, E. O., Joerges, C., and Neyer, J., eds. (2003). European Governance, Deliberation and the Quest for Democratisation, Oslo: Arena.Google Scholar
Ferrari, S. (2002). Canon Law as a Religious Legal System, in Huxley, A., ed., Religion, Law and Tradition: Comparative Studies in Religious Law, London: Routledge, 49–60.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gardner, J. (2012). Law as a Leap of Faith: Essays on Law in General, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Glenn, H. P. (2014). Legal Traditions of the World, 3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goyard-Fabre, S. (1972). Essai de critique phénoménologique du droit. Klinckbeck: Paris.Google Scholar
Greenfield, A. (2017). Radical Technologies: The Design of Everyday Life, Brooklyn: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Günther, K. (1993). The Sense of Appropriateness, Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Günther, K. (2001). Rechtspluralismus und universaler Code der Legalität: Globalisierung als rechtstheoretischer Problem, in Wingert, L. and Günther, K., eds., Die Öffentlichkeit der Vernunft und die Vernunft der Öffentlichkeit, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 539–567.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action, vol. 1, translated by McCarthy, T., London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1989a). The Theory of Communicative Action, vol. 2, translated by McCarthy, T., Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1989b). Towards a Communication-Concept of Rational Collective Will-Formation. Ratio Juris, 2(2), 144–154.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms, translated by Rehg, W., Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Haeyk, F. A. (1982). Law, Legislation, and Liberty, vol. 1, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Halliday, T., and Shaffer, G., eds. (2016). Transnational Legal Orders, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (2012). Postscript, in The Concept of Law, 3rd ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 238–275.Google Scholar
Hartney, M. (1991). Introduction: The Final Form of the Pure Theory of Law, in Kelsen, H., General Theory of Norms, translated by Hartney, M., Oxford: Clarendon Press, ix–liii.Google Scholar
Hattenhauer, H., ed. (2002). Thibaut und Savigny: Ihre programmatischen Schriften, 2nd ed., Munich: Vahlen.Google Scholar
Helleiner, E. (2016). Regulating the Regulators: The Emergence and Limits of the Transnational Financial Legal Order, in Halliday, T. and Shaffer, G., eds., Transnational Legal Orders, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 231–257.Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, M. (2015). Smart Technologies and the End(s) of Law: Novel Entanglements of Law and Technology, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, M. (2018). Algorithmic Regulation and the Rule of Law. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 376(2128), 20170355.Google Scholar
Hohfeld, W. N. (1919). Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning and Other Legal Essays, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hurri, S. (2014). Birth of the European Individual: Law, Security, Economy, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jansen, N. (2010). The Making of Legal Authority: Non-Legislative Codifications in Historical and Comparative Perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1911). Hauptprobleme der Staatsrechtslehre entwickelt aus der Lehre vom Rechtssatze, Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1929). Wesen und Entwicklung der Staatsgerichtsbarkeit, in Veröffentlichungen der Vereinigung der deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer 5, Berlin: De Gruyter, 30–123.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1945). General Theory of Law and State, translated by Wedberg, Anders, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1957). What Is Justice? Justice, Law and Politics in the Mirror of Science, Collected Essays, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1967). The Pure Theory of Law, translation from the 2nd German ed. by Knight, M., Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1991). General Theory of Norms, translated by Hartney, M., Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, H. (2008). Reine Rechtslehre. Studienausgabe der 1. Auflage 1934, herausgegeben von Matthias Jestaedt. Tûbingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Klabbers, J. (1996). The Redundancy of Soft Law. Nordic Yearbook of International Law, 65, 156–182.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. (2007). International Law: Constitutionalism, Managerialism and the Ethos of Legal Education. European Journal of Legal Studies, 1, 1–18.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M., and Leino, P.. (2002). Fragmentation of International Law? Postmodern Anxieties. Leiden Journal of International Law, 15(3), 553–557.Google Scholar
Lagerspetz, E. (1995). The Opposite Mirrors: An Essay on the Conventionalist Theory of Institutions, Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Lessig, L. (2006). Code: And Other Laws of Cyberspace, Version 2.0, 2nd rev. ed., New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lindahl, H. (2013). Fault Lines of Globalization: Legal Order and the Politics of A-legality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (2004). Law as a Social System, translated by Ziegert, K. A., Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCormick, N. D. (1986). Law as an Institutional Fact, in MacCormick, N. D. and Weinberger, O., eds., An Institutional Theory of Law, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 49–76.Google Scholar
Majone, G. (1994). The Rise of the Regulatory State. West European Politics, 17(3), 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makkonen, K. (1965). Zur Problematik der juridischen Entscheidung, Turku: Turun yliopisto.Google Scholar
Mataija, M. (2020). Private Standard Setting in the TBT Agreement: Control and Recognition. In Cantero Gamito, M. and Micklitz, H.-W., eds., The Role of the EU in Transnational Legal Ordering: Standards, Contracts and Codes, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 135–154.Google Scholar
Maus, I. (1989). Die Trennung von Recht und Moral als Begrenzung des Rechts. Rechtstheorie, 20(2), 191–210.Google Scholar
Michaels, R. (2005). The Re-State-Ment of Non-State Law: The State, Choice of Law, and the Challenge from Global Legal Pluralism. Wayne Law Review, 51, 1209–1259.Google Scholar
Micklitz, H.-W. (2011). Introduction, in Micklitz, H.-W., ed., The Many Concepts of Social Justice in Private Law, London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Pashukanis, E. B. ([1929] 1978). Law and Marxism: A General Theory, translated by Einhorn, B., edited and introduced by Arthur, C., London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Raz, J. (1979). The Authority of Law: Essays in Law and Morality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263.Google Scholar
Reinach, A. ([1913] 2013). The Apriori Foundations of the Civil Law, Heusenstamm: Ontos.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1992). Oneself as Another, translated by Blamely, K., Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, S. (2005). After Government? On Representing Law without the State. The Modern Law Review, 68(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
Rosa, H. (2013). Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity, translated by Trejo-Mathys, J., New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Sassen, S. (2008). Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Savigny, K. F. von ([1814] 2002). Vom Beruf unsrer Zeit für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft, in Hattenhauer, H., ed., Thibaut und Savigny: Ihre programmatischen Schriften, Munich: Vahlen, 42–87.Google Scholar
Savigny, K. F. von ([1840] 1981). System des heutigen römischen Rechts, vols. 1–2, Aalen: Scientia. (System I–II)Google Scholar
Schatzki, T. R. (1997). Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schepel, H. (2005). The Constitution of Private Governance: Product Standards in the Regulation of Integrating Markets, Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Schepel, H. (2013). The New Approach to the New Approach. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 20(4), 521–533.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. ([1921] 2014). Dictatorship: From the Origin of the Modern Concept of Sovereignty to Proletarian Class Struggle, translated by Hoelzl, M. and Ward, G., Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. ([1928] 2008). Constitutional Theory, translated and edited by Seitzer, J., with a foreword by Kennedy, E., Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Schroer, M. (2006). Räume, Orte, Grenzen: Auf dem Weg zu einer Soziologie des Raums, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Schutz, A. (1962). Common-Sense and Scientific Interpretation of Human Action, in Natanson, M., eds., Collected Papers I. The Problem of Social Reality, introduced by Natanson, M., with a preface by van Breda, H. L., The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (2010). Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (1989). The state, in Ball, T., Farr, J., and Hanson, R. L., eds., Political Innovation and Conceptual Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 90–131.Google Scholar
Sousa Santos, B. de (2002). Toward a New Legal Commonsense: Law, Globalization and Emancipation, 2nd ed., Toronto: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Stemler, A. (2016). Regulation 2.0: The Marriage of New Governance and Lex Informatica. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law, 19(1), 87–132.Google Scholar
Stolzenberg, N. M. (2015). Is There Such a Thing as Non-State Law? Lessons from Kiryas Joel, in Helfand, M. A., ed., Negotiating State and Non-state Law: The Challenge of Global and Local Legal Pluralism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 261–307.Google Scholar
Summers, R. S. (1982). Instrumentalism and American Legal Theory, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Tamanaha, B. Z. (2001). A General Jurisprudence of Law and Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Teubner, G. (2004a). Global Private Regimes: Neo-Spontaneous Law and Dual Constitution of Autonomous Sectors?, in Ladeur, K.-H., ed., Public Governance in the Age of Globalization, Aldershot: Ashgate, 71–87.Google Scholar
Teubner, G. (2004b). Societal Constitutionalism: Alternatives to State-Centred Constitutional Theory?, in Joerges, C., Sand, I. J., and Teubner, G., eds., Constitutionalism and Transnational Governance, Oxford: Hart, 3–28.Google Scholar
Teubner, G. (2013). Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Teubner, G. (2020). Counter-Rights, in Kjaer, P. F., ed., The Law of Political Economy: Transformation in the Function of Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 372–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, G., and Fischer-Lescano, A. (2004). Regime Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law. Michigan Journal of International Law, 25, 999–1017.Google Scholar
Tobin, B. (2014). Indigenous Peoples, Customary Law and Human Rights: Why Living Law Matters, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tuomela, R. (2002). The Philosophy of Social Practices: A Collective Acceptance View, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tuori, K. (2011). Ratio and Voluntas: The Tension between Reason and Will in Law, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Tuori, K. (2015b). Lawyers and Savages: Ancient History and Legal Realism in the Making of Legal Anthropology, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Twining, W. (2000). Globalization and Legal Theory, Evanston: Northwest University Press.Google Scholar
Twining, W. (2009). General Jurisprudence: Understanding Law from a Global Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M. ([1922] 1978). Economy and Society, edited by Roth, G. and Wittich, C., translated by Fischoff, E. et al., Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wintgens, L. (2012). Legisprudence: Practical Reason in Legislation, Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Woodman, G. R. (1998). Ideological Combat and Social Observation: Recent Debate about Legal Pluralism. The Journal of Legal Pluralism, 30(42), 21–59.Google Scholar
Wróblewski, J. (1979). Verification and Justification in the Legal Sciences. Rechtstheorie, 1, 195–213.Google Scholar
Yeung, K. (2018). Algorithmic Regulation: A Critical Interrogation. Regulation and Governance, 12(4), 505–523.Google Scholar
Yeung, K., & Lodge, M. (2019). Algorithmic Regulation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for the Future at the New Frontier of Power, London: Profile Books.Google Scholar