Book contents
- Forensic Aspects of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Forensic Aspects of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Copyright page
- About the Cover Page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword by the Rt Hon Lord Bradley
- Terminology Used in the Book
- Section 1 An Overview: Definitions, Epidemiology and Policy Issues
- Section 2 Assessment and Therapeutic Approach
- Section 3 Criminal Justice Pathways and Legal Issues
- Chapter 16 Criminal Justice Pathways and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Chapter 17 The Mental Health Act and Other Relevant Legislation in Relation to Neurodevelopmental Disorders in the UK
- Chapter 18 Fitness to Plead and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Chapter 19 Fitness to Plead Procedures in Relation to Mental Health and Capacity Legislation
- Chapter 20 Forensic Services for Neurodevelopmental Disorders: An English Perspective
- Chapter 21 Offenders with Neurodevelopmental Disorders in Four Nordic Countries
- Chapter 22 Forensic Neurodevelopmental Disabilities: A Perspective from Ontario, Canada on Pathways and Services
- Chapter 23 Forensic Aspects of Neurodevelopmental Disorders: An Australasian Perspective
- Chapter 24 Concluding Comments
- Index
- References
Chapter 16 - Criminal Justice Pathways and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
from Section 3 - Criminal Justice Pathways and Legal Issues
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 May 2023
Book contents
- Forensic Aspects of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Forensic Aspects of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Copyright page
- About the Cover Page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword by the Rt Hon Lord Bradley
- Terminology Used in the Book
- Section 1 An Overview: Definitions, Epidemiology and Policy Issues
- Section 2 Assessment and Therapeutic Approach
- Section 3 Criminal Justice Pathways and Legal Issues
- Chapter 16 Criminal Justice Pathways and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Chapter 17 The Mental Health Act and Other Relevant Legislation in Relation to Neurodevelopmental Disorders in the UK
- Chapter 18 Fitness to Plead and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Chapter 19 Fitness to Plead Procedures in Relation to Mental Health and Capacity Legislation
- Chapter 20 Forensic Services for Neurodevelopmental Disorders: An English Perspective
- Chapter 21 Offenders with Neurodevelopmental Disorders in Four Nordic Countries
- Chapter 22 Forensic Neurodevelopmental Disabilities: A Perspective from Ontario, Canada on Pathways and Services
- Chapter 23 Forensic Aspects of Neurodevelopmental Disorders: An Australasian Perspective
- Chapter 24 Concluding Comments
- Index
- References
Summary
People with a wide range of mental health and neurodevelopmental conditions are found amongst criminal justice populations, and many present with co-occurring disorders. These may include other neurodevelopmental conditions, substance use disorders or physical health conditions. It is now standard practice to use a pathways approach to organise and deliver services, and journeys taken by many people within criminal justice systems lend themselves to this, at least in theory. Basic requirements of this approach include police custody and prison reception screening, providing organised multidisciplinary care and introducing appropriate interventions as part of individual care plans. There is much we still do not know about vulnerable people in prisons, and service provision remains far from optimal. In particular, insufficient specialist provision means that many people with neurodevelopmental conditions are not identified appropriately, and do not have their needs met as they should. Further, in the absence of support, the presentations of some people render them vulnerable to specific aspects of prison life.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Forensic Aspects of Neurodevelopmental DisordersA Clinician's Guide, pp. 191 - 201Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Schrijvers, G, van Hoorn, A, Huiskes, N. The care pathway: concepts and theories: an introduction. International Journal of Integrated Care 2012; 12: e192.Google Scholar
Kinsman, L, Rotter, T, James, E, Snow, P, Willis, J. What is a clinical pathway? Development of a definition to inform the debate. BMC Medicine 2010; 8(1): 1–3.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Physical health of people in prison. Available from: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng57.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Mental health of adults in contact with the criminal justice system. Available from: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng66.Google Scholar
Forrester, A, Hopkin, G. Mental health in the criminal justice system: a pathways approach to service and research design. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health 2019; 29(4): 207–17.Google Scholar
McKinnon, IG, Thomas, SD, Noga, HL, Senior, J. Police custody health care: a review of health morbidity, models of care and innovations within police custody in the UK, with international comparisons. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy. 2016; 9: 213.Google Scholar
Fazel, S, Baillargeon, J. The health of prisoners. Lancet 2011; 377(9769): 956–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKinnon, I, Grubin, D. Health screening in police custody. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 2010; 17(4): 209–12.Google Scholar
Martin, MS, Colman, I, Simpson, AI, McKenzie, K. Mental health screening tools in correctional institutions: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry 2013; 13(1): 275.Google Scholar
United Nations. United Nations standard minimum rules for the treatment of prisoners (the Nelson Mandela Rules). 2015. Available at: www.unodc.org/documents/justice-and-prison-reform/Nelson_Mandela_Rules-E-ebook.pdf.Google Scholar
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Data matters. Available at: www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/statistics/DataMatters1_prison.pdf.Google Scholar
Fazel, S, Hayes, AJ, Bartellas, K, Clerici, M, Trestman, R. Mental health of prisoners: prevalence, adverse outcomes, and interventions. Lancet Psychiatry 2016; 3(9): 871–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fazel, S, Xenitidis, K, Powell, J. The prevalence of intellectual disabilities among 12 000 prisoners: a systematic review. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 2008; 31(4): 369–73.Google Scholar
Jones, G, Talbot, J. No one knows: the bewildering passage of offenders with learning disability and learning difficulty through the criminal justice system. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health 2010; 20: 1.Google Scholar
Hassiotis, A, Gazizova, D, Akinlonu, L, Bebbington, P, Meltzer, H, Strydom, A. Psychiatric morbidity in prisoners with intellectual disabilities: analysis of prison survey data for England and Wales. British Journal of Psychiatry 2011; 199(2): 156–7.Google Scholar
Young, S, Moss, D, Sedgwick, O, Fridman, M, Hodgkins, P. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in incarcerated populations. Psychological Medicine 2015; 45(2): 247–58.Google Scholar
Young, S, Sedgwick, O, Fridman, M, Gudjonsson, G, Hodgkins, P, Lantigua, M et al. Co-morbid psychiatric disorders among incarcerated ADHD populations: a meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine 2015; 45(12): 2499–510.Google Scholar
Underwood, L, Forrester, A, Chaplin, E, McCarthy, J. Prisoners with neurodevelopmental disorders. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour 2013; 4(1/2): 17–23.Google Scholar
Robinson, L, Spencer, MD, Thomson, LD, Stanfield, AC, Owens, DG, Hall, J, et al. Evaluation of a screening instrument for autism spectrum disorders in prisoners. PLOS One. 2012; 7(5): e36078.Google Scholar
Underwood, L, McCarthy, J, Chaplin, E, Forrester, A, Mills, R, Murphy, D. Autism spectrum disorder traits among prisoners. Advances in Autism 2016; 2(3): 106–17.Google Scholar
Robertson, CE, McGillivray, JA. Autism behind bars: a review of the research literature and discussion of key issues. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology 2015; 26(6): 719–36.Google Scholar
Dewey, D. What is comorbidity and why does it matter in neurodevelopmental disorders?. Current Developmental Disorders Reports 2018; 5(4): 235–42.Google Scholar
Forrester, A, Till, A, Simpson, S, Shaw, J. Mental illness and the provision of mental health services in prisons. British Medical Bulletin 2018; 127: 101–9.Google Scholar
Simpson, AIF, Gerritsen, C, Maheandiran, M, Adamo, V, Vogel, T, Fulham, L. A systematic review of reviews of correctional mental health services using the STAIR framework. Frontiers in Psychiatry 2018; 12: 747202.Google Scholar
Samele, C, McKinnon, I, Brown, P, Srivastava, S, Arnold, A, Hallett, N, et al. The prevalence of mental illness and unmet needs of police custody detainees. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health 2021; 31(2): 80–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forrester, A, Samele, C, Slade, K, Craig, T, Valmaggia, L. Suicide ideation amongst people referred for mental health assessment in police custody. Journal of Criminal Psychology 2016; 6(4): 146–56.Google Scholar
Forrester, A, Samele, C, Slade, K, Craig, T, Valmaggia, L. Demographic and clinical characteristics of 1092 consecutive police custody mental health referrals. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology 2017; 28(3): 295–312.Google Scholar
Young, S, Goodwin, EJ, Sedgwick, O, Gudjonsson, GH. The effectiveness of police custody assessments in identifying suspects with intellectual disabilities and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. BMC Medicine 2013; 11(1): 248.Google Scholar
McKinnon, IG, Grubin, D. Health screening of people in police custody: evaluation of current police screening procedures in London, UK. European Journal of Public Health 2013; 23(3): 399–405.Google Scholar
McKinnon, I, Thorp, J, Grubin, D. Improving the detection of detainees with suspected intellectual disability in police custody. Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities 2015; 9(4): 174–85.Google Scholar
Noga, HL, Walsh, EC, Shaw, JJ, Senior, J. The development of a mental health screening tool and referral pathway for police custody. European Journal of Public Health 2015; 25(2): 237–42.Google Scholar
NHS England and NHS Improvement. Liaison and diversion standard service specification 2019. Available at: www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/national-liaison-and-diversion-service-specification-2019.pdf.Google Scholar
Department of Health. The Bradley Report: Lord Bradley’s review of people with mental health problems or learning disabilities in the criminal justice system. Available at: https://lx.iriss.org.uk/sites/default/files/resources/The%20Bradley%20report.pdf.Google Scholar
Scott, DA, McGilloway, S, Dempster, M, Browne, F, Donnelly, M. Effectiveness of criminal justice liaison and diversion services for offenders with mental disorders: a review. Psychiatric Services 2013; 64(9): 843–9.Google Scholar
Gudjonsson, G. ‘Fitness for interview’ during police detention: a conceptual framework for forensic assessment. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry 1995; 6(1): 185–97.Google Scholar
Stark, M, Rix, K. Fitness to be interviewed and fitness to be charged. In Stark, M, eds., Clinical Forensic Medicine. Springer, 2020: 393–420.Google Scholar
Gudjonsson, GH, Clark, NK. Suggestibility in police interrogation: a social psychological model. Social Behaviour 1986; 1: 83–104.Google Scholar
Gudjonsson, GH. The Psychology of Interrogations and Confessions: A Handbook. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2003.Google Scholar
James, DV. Court diversion in perspective. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 2006; 40(6–7): 529–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, J, Creed, F, Price, J, Huxley, P, Tomenson, B. Prevalence and detection of serious psychiatric disorder in defendants attending court. Lancet 1999; 353(9158): 1053–6.Google Scholar
Chaplin, E, McCarthy, J, Marshall-Tate, K, Ali, S, Xenitidis, K, Childs, J, Harvey, D. Evaluation of a liaison and diversion court mental health service for defendants with neurodevelopmental disorders. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2021; 1(119): 104103.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J, Chaplin, E, Hayes, S, Søndenaa, E, Chester, V, Morrissey, C, et al. Defendants with intellectual disability and autism spectrum conditions: the perspective of clinicians working across three jurisdictions. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 2021; 2: 1–20.Google Scholar
Gerry, F, Cooper, P. Effective participation of vulnerable accused persons: case management, court adaptation and rethinking criminal responsibility. Journal of Judicial Administration 2017; 1: 265–75.Google Scholar
Brown, P. Unfitness to plead in England and Wales: historical development and contemporary dilemmas. Medicine, Science and the Law 2019; 59(3): 187–96.Google Scholar
Forrester, A, Hopkin, G, Bryant, L, Slade, K, Samele, C. Alternatives to custodial remand for women in the criminal justice system: a multi‐sector approach. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health 2020; 30(2–3): 68–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, GH, Gardner, J, Freeman, MJ. Screening prisoners for intellectual disabilities in three English prisons. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 2017; 30(1): 198–204.Google Scholar
Patel, R, Harvey, J, Forrester, A. Systemic limitations in the delivery of mental health care in prisons in England. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 2018; 1; 60: 17–25.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. People with learning disabilities. Available at: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/population-groups/people-with-learning-disabilities.Google Scholar
Young, S, Gudjonsson, G, Chitsabesan, P, Colley, B, Farrag, E, Forrester, A, et al. Identification and treatment of offenders with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in the prison population: a practical approach based upon expert consensus. BMC Psychiatry 2018; 18(1): 1–6.Google Scholar
Ireland, J. Bullying Among Prisoners: Innovations in Theory and Research Willan Publishing, 2005.Google Scholar
Maitra, DR. ‘If you’re down with a gang inside, you can lead a nice life’: prison gangs in the age of austerity. Youth Justice 2020; 20(1–2): 128–45.Google Scholar
Maxwell, Y, Day, A, Casey, S. Understanding the needs of vulnerable prisoners: the role of social and emotional wellbeing. International Journal of Prisoner Health 2013; 9(2), 57–67.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J, Chaplin, E, Forrester, A, Underwood, L, Hayward, H, Sabet, J, et al. Prisoners with neurodevelopmental difficulties: vulnerabilities for mental illness and self‐harm. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health 2019; 29(5–6): 308–20.Google Scholar
National Offender Management Service. Service specification for prison discipline and segregation: segregation of prisoners. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/278911/2014-01-14_Segregation_of_Prisoners_Specification_P2_2.pdf.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by