Book contents
- International Economic Dispute Settlement
- International Economic Dispute Settlement
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Contracting v. Multilateralism in Global Economic Governance
- Part I Current Challenges in International Trade Dispute Settlement
- Part II Current Challenges in International Investment Dispute Settlement
- Part III New Issue Areas and Dispute Settlement
- Part IV Regional Approaches for International Economic Dispute Settlement
- Index
- References
1 - Introduction
International Economic Dispute Settlement – Demise or Transformation?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 August 2021
Book contents
- International Economic Dispute Settlement
- International Economic Dispute Settlement
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Contracting v. Multilateralism in Global Economic Governance
- Part I Current Challenges in International Trade Dispute Settlement
- Part II Current Challenges in International Investment Dispute Settlement
- Part III New Issue Areas and Dispute Settlement
- Part IV Regional Approaches for International Economic Dispute Settlement
- Index
- References
Summary
Over the past thirty years, international trade has grown constantly and since 2008 it has increased by 26 per cent (World Trade Organization 2019). In the same period, foreign direct investment (FDI) grew more than 20 per cent before 2000, 8 per cent in 2000–7, and has shown slow growth since 2008, averaging about 1 per cent growth per year for a decade (UNCTAD 2019b, xi). We have also observed (but lack systematic data) a spectacular growth of trade in parts and components and a substantial increase of trade in services, reflecting companies’ investment and sourcing decisions, increasing the web of global and regional supply chains. The “death of distance” through lower transport costs and advancements in information technology has contributed to accelerating these developments. Integration into the world economy has also become an important element of foreign aid policy. All of these economic and political processes have been underpinned since the end of the Cold War by a liberal consensus.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- International Economic Dispute SettlementDemise or Transformation?, pp. 1 - 14Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Baumgartner, J. 2016. Treaty Shopping in International Investment Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berthier, D., Monfort, B. and Stoliaroff-Pépin, A.-M. 2017. In 2017, the Trade Openness Ratio of the Global Economy Would Appear to Be Recovering at Last. Conjuncture in France, www.insee.fr/en/statistiques/2872057?sommaire=2872121.Google Scholar
Elsig, M. 2015. “WTO Dispute Settlement and the Study of Compliance,” Journal of International Trade Law and Policy 14(3): 112–15.Google Scholar
Elsig, M. 2017. “Legalization in Context: The Design of the WTO’s Dispute Settlement System,” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 19(2): 304–19.Google Scholar
Elsig, M. and Eckhardt, J. 2015. “The Creation of the Multilateral Trade Court: Design and Experiential Learning,” World Trade Review 14(S1): S13–S32.Google Scholar
Giest, A. 2017. “Interpreting Public Interest Provisions in International Investment Treaties,” Chicago Journal of International Law 18(1): 321–52.Google Scholar
Guzman, A. T. 1998. “Why LDCs Sign Treaties That Hurt Them: Explaining the Popularity of Bilateral Investment Treaties,” Virginia Journal of International Law 38: 639–88.Google Scholar
Haftel, Y. and Thompson, A. 2018. “When Do States Renegotiate Investment Agreements? The Impact of Arbitration,” The Review of International Organizations 13(1): 25–48.Google Scholar
Hodgson, M. and Campbell, A. 2017. Damages and Costs in Investment Treaty Arbitration Revisited. Global Arbitration Review, www.itd.or.th/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Annex-2-Allen-and-Overy-Damages-and-costs-in-investment-treaty-arbitration-revisited-December-2017.pdf.Google Scholar
Kenny, W. 2016. “Transparency in Investor State Arbitration,” Journal of International Arbitration 33(5): 471–500.Google Scholar
Langford, M., Behn, D. and Lie, R. H. 2017. “The Revolving Door in International Investment Arbitration,” Journal of International Economic Law 20(2): 301–32.Google Scholar
Polanco Lazo, R. 2016. “Two Worlds Apart: The Changing Features of International Investment Agreements in Latin America.” In Tanzi, A., Asteriti, A., Polanco Lazo, R. and Turrini, P. (Eds.), International Investment Law in Latin America / Derecho Internacional de las Inversiones en América Latina, Vol. 5, Leiden: Brill/Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 68–97.Google Scholar
Polanco, R. 2019. The Return of the Home State to Investor-State Disputes: Bringing Back Diplomatic Protection? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Poulsen, L. 2015. Bounded Rationality and Economic Diplomacy: The Politics of Investment Treaties in Developing Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Puig, S. and Shaffer, G. 2018. “Imperfect Alternatives: Institutional Choice and the Reform of Investment Law,” American Journal of International Law 112(3): 361–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, G., Elsig, M. and Puig, S. 2016. “The Extensive (But Fragile) Authority of the WTO Appellate Body,” Law and Contemporary Problems 79(1): 237–73.Google Scholar
UNCITRAL 2020. Working Group III: Investor–State Dispute Settlement Reform, https://uncitral.un.org/en/working_groups/3/investor-state. Accessed 14 February 2020.Google Scholar
UNCTAD 2019a. World Investment Report 2019. Special Economic Zones, Geneva, Switzerland, https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wir2019_en.pdf.Google Scholar
UNCTAD 2019b. Taking Stock of IIA Reform: Recent Developments. Issue Note (3), https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/diaepcbinf2019d5_en.pdf.Google Scholar
UNCTAD 2020. Investment Policy Hub. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/investment-dispute-settlement. Accessed 9 September 2020.Google Scholar
Van den Bossche, P. 2006. “From Afterthought to Centerpiece: The WTO Appellate Body and Its Rise to Prominence in the World Trading System.” In Sacerdoti, G., Yanovich, A. and Bohanes, J. (Eds.), The WTO at Ten: The Contribution of the Dispute Settlement System, 1st ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 289–325.Google Scholar
Von Stein, J. 2012. “The Engines of Compliance.” In Dunoff, J. L. and Pollack, M. A. (Eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 477–501.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization 2019. World Trade Statistical Review 2019, Geneva: World Trade Organization, www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/wts2019_e/wts2019_e.pdf.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization 2020. Dispute Settlement Activity – Some Figures. Geneva: World Trade Organization, www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispustats_e.htm. Accessed 9 September 2020.Google Scholar