Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T19:11:42.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 14 - Assisted Vaginal Birth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2022

By
Emily J Hotton  and
Joanna F Crofts
Edited by
Swati Jha  and
Eloise Power
Swati Jha
Affiliation:
Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield
Eloise Power
Affiliation:
Sergeants’ Inn, London
Get access

Summary

JRM was one of twins, delivered by forceps at 29 weeks and suffered serious injury to his spinal cord around the time of his birth. The forceps caused traumatic injury and tearing of the lining of the spinal artery (arterial dissection), and subsequent clot formation within the vessel resulting in vascular injury to the spinal cord due to occlusion of a branch of the anterior spinal artery. It was alleged that this was due to the negligent use of forceps with the claimant in the occipito-lateral (OL) position at birth.

Type
Chapter
Information
Lessons from Medicolegal Cases in Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Improving Clinical Practice
 , pp. 179 - 191
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Keriakos, R, Sugumar, S, Hilal, N. Instrumental vaginal delivery – back to basics. J Obstet Gynaecol 2013; 33(8): 781–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, D, Strachan, B, Bahl, R, on behalf of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Assisted Vaginal Birth. BJOG 2020; 127(9): e70–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, DJ, Liebling, RE, Verity, L, Swingler, R, Patel, R. Early maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with operative delivery in second stage of labour: a cohort study. Lancet 2001; 358(9289): 1203–7.Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Birth after Previous Caesarean Birth: Green–top Guideline No. 45 [Internet]. 2015. Available from: www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg_45.pdfGoogle Scholar
Norman, JE, Stock, SJ. Birth options after a caesarean section. Br Med J (Clinical research ed) 2018; 360: j5737.Google Scholar
Clark, EAS, Silver, RM. Long-term maternal morbidity associated with repeat cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205(6 Suppl): S2–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moraitis, AA, Oliver-Williams, C, Wood, AM, Fleming, M, Pell, JP, Smith, G. Previous caesarean delivery and the risk of unexplained stillbirth: retrospective cohort study and meta-analysis. BJOG 2015; 122(11): 1467–74.Google Scholar
Bahl, R, Strachan, B, Murphy, DJ. Outcome of subsequent pregnancy three years after previous operative delivery in the second stage of labour: cohort study. Br Med J (Clinical research ed) 2004; 328(7435): 311.Google Scholar
Gupta, M, Hockley, C, Quigley, MA, Yeh, P, Impey, L. Antenatal and intrapartum prediction of shoulder dystocia. Eur J Obstet Gyn R B 2010; 151(2): 134–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NHS Digital. NHS Maternity Statistics, England 2019–2020 [Online]. Available from: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/nhs-maternity-statistics/2019-20Google Scholar
O’Mahony, F, Hofmeyr, GJ, Menon, V. Choice of instruments for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 16(11): 201–7.Google Scholar
Handa, VL, Blomquist, JL, McDermott, KC, Friedman, S, Muñoz, A. Pelvic floor disorders after vaginal birth: effect of episiotomy, perineal laceration, and operative birth. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119(2 Pt 1): 233–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bahl, R, Venne, MV, Macleod, M, Strachan, B, Murphy, DJ. Maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to the instrument used for mid-cavity rotational operative vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study. BJOG 2013; 120(12): 1526–33.Google Scholar
Macleod, M, Strachan, B, Bahl, R, Howarth, L, Goyder, K, Venne, MV, et al. A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery. BJOG 2008; 115(13): 1688–94.Google Scholar
Murphy, DJ, Macleod, M, Bahl, R, Strachan, B. A cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of sequential instruments at operative vaginal delivery. Eur J Obstet Gyn R B 2011; 156(1): 41–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Black, M, Murphy, DJ. Forceps delivery for non-rotational and rotational operative vaginal delivery. Best Pract Res Cl Ob 2019; 56: 55–68.Google Scholar
Demissie, K, Rhoads, GG, Smulian, JC, Balasubramanian, BA, Gandhi, K, Joseph, KS, et al. Operative vaginal delivery and neonatal and infant adverse outcomes: population-based retrospective analysis. Br Med J 2004; 329(7456): 24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caughey, AB, Sandberg, PL, Zlatnik, MG, Thiet, M-P, Parer, JT, Laros, RK. Forceps compared with vacuum: rates of neonatal and maternal morbidity. Obstetrics Gynecol 2005; 106(5, Part 1): 908–12.Google Scholar
Uchil, D, Arulkumaran, S. Neonatal subgaleal hemorrhage and its relationship to delivery by vacuum extraction. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2003; 58(10): 687–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Operative Vaginal Delivery. Consent Advice No. 11. [Internet]. 2010. Available from: www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/ca11-15072010.pdfGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×