Abney, Paul S. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. 2001. Clitiques phonétiques ou clitiques tout court. In Muller, Claude, de Carvalho, Paulo, Labrune, Laurence, Lambert, Frédéric, and Ploog, Katja (eds.), Clitiques et cliticisation. Paris: Honoré Champion, 461–481.Google Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. 2002. La morphosyntaxe de la péripherie gauche nominale. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes 31: 9–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. 2003a. Les constructions à objet préposé et les series verbales dans les langues kwa. In Sauzet, Patrick and Zribi-Hertz, Anne (eds.), Typologie des langues d’Afrique et universaux de la grammaire. Vol. II: ‘Benue-Kwa, Soninke, Wolof’. Paris: L’Harmattan, 15–40.Google Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. 2003b. Focus constructions across Kwa. In Githiora, Cege, Littlefield, Heather, and Manfredi, Victor (eds.), Kinyira njira! Step firmly on the pathway! Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press, 7–22.Google Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. 2004a. The morphosyntax of complement-head sequences: Clause structure and word order patterns in Kwa. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. 2004b. Left or right? A view from the Kwa peripheral positions. In Adger, David, De Cat, Cécile, and Tsoulas, George (eds.), Peripheries: Syntactic edges and their effects. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 165–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. 2004c. Topic and focus within D. Linguistics in The Netherlands 21: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. 2005a. Pattern and feature competition: Toward a syntactic account to contact-induced transfer. Conference on Creole language structure between substrates and superstrates. MPI Leipzig (Germany) June 3–5, 2005.Google Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. 2005b. The category P: The Kwa paradox. Linguistic Analysis 32: 615–646.Google Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. 2005c. Object shift, verb movement and verb reduplication. In Cinque, Guglielmo and Kayne, Richard (eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax. New York: Oxford University Press, 138–177.Google Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. 2005d. Deriving relative and factive constructions in Kwa. In Brugè, Laura, Giusti, Giuliana, Munaro, Nicola, Schweikert, Walter, and Turano, Giuseppina (eds.), Contributions to the thirtieth incontro di grammatica generativa. Venice: Cafoscarina, 265–285.Google Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. 2006a. The role of the syntax-semantics interface in language transfer. In Lefebvre, Claire, White, Lydia, and Jourdan, Christine (eds.), L2 acquisition and creole genesis: Dialogues. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 221–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. 2006b. Complementation in Saramaccan and Gungbe: The case of C-type modal particles. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24: 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. 2006c. When verbal predicates go fronting. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 46: 21–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. 2007a. La genèse de la périphérie gauche du saramaka: un cas d’influence du substrat? In Gadelii, Karl and Zribi-Hertz, Anne (eds.), Grammaires créoles et grammaire comparative. Saint-Denis: Presses Universitaires de Paris, 73–97.Google Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. 2007b. A “mini” relative clause analysis for reduplicated attributive adjectives. Linguistics in The Netherlands 24: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. 2009a. Competition and selection: That’s all. In Aboh, Enoch O. and Smith, Norval (eds.), Complex processes in new languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 317–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. 2009b. Clause structure and verb series. Linguistic Inquiry 40: 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. 2009c. Delete: A phase-level property. Theoretical Linguistics 35: 229–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. 2010a. The morphosyntax of the noun phrase. In Aboh, Enoch O. and Essegbey, James (eds.), Topics in Kwa syntax. Dordrecht: Springer, 11–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. 2010b. The P-route. In Cinque, Guglielmo and Rizzi, Luigi (eds.), Mapping spatial PPs: The cartography of syntactic structures. New York: Oxford University Press, 225–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. 2010c. C-type negation markers on the right edge. In Aboh, Enoch O. and Essegbey, James (eds.), Topics in Kwa syntax. Dordrecht: Springer, 109–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. 2010d. The syntax of inherent complement verbs in Gungbe. Unpublished manuscript, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. 2010e. Information Structuring begins with the numeration. IBERIA 2, 1: 12–42. www.siff.us.es/iberia/index.php/ij/indexGoogle Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. 2010f. Event operator movement in factives: Some facts from Gungbe. Theoretical Linguistics 36: 153–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. The syntax of edges. Unpublished manuscript, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. and Ansaldo, Umberto. 2007. The role of typology in language creation: A descriptive take. In Ansaldo, Umberto, Mathew, Steve M., and Lim, Lisa (eds.), Deconstructing Creole. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 39–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. and DeGraff, Michel. 2014. Some notes on nominal phrases in Haitian Creole and in Gungbe: A transatlantic Sprachbund perspective. In Afarli, Tor A. and Maehlum, Brit (eds.), The sociolinguistics of grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 203–236).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. and DeGraff, Michel Forthcoming. A null theory of creolization based on universal grammar. To appear in Roberts, Ian (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Universal Grammar. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. and Dyakonova, Marina. 2009. Predicate doubling and parallel chains. Lingua 119: 1035–1065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. and Essegbey, James (eds.) 2010. Topics in Kwa syntax. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O., Hartmann, Katharina, and Zimmermann, Malte (eds.) 2007. Focus strategies in Niger Congo and Afro-Asiatic: On the interaction between focus and grammar in some African languages. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. and Nauze, Fabrice. 2008. Tense, Mood, and Aspect in Gungbe (Kwa). In Abraham, Werner and Leiss, Elisabeth (eds.), Modality-aspect interfaces: implications and typological solutions. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 215–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O and Pfau, Roland. 2011. What’s a wh-word got to do with it? In Benincà, Paula and Munaro, Nicola (eds.), Mapping the left periphery: The cartography of syntactic structures. New York: Oxford University Press, 91–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. and Smith, Norval (eds.) 2009. Complex processes in new languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. and Smith, Norval 2009. Simplicity, simplification, complexity and complexification: Where have the interfaces gone? In Aboh, Enoch O. and Smith, Norval (eds.), Complex processes in new languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. and Smith, Norval 2012. The morphosyntax of non-iconic reduplications: A case study in Eastern Gbe and the Surinam creoles. In Aboh, Enoch O., Smith, Norval, and Zribi-Hertz, Anne (eds.), The grammar of reiteration in creole and non-creole languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 27–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. and Smith, Norval 2015a. Migrations, ethno-dynamics and geolinguistics in the Eastern Aja-Tado cultural area. In Muysken, Pieter and Smith, Norval (eds.), Surviving the Middle Passage: The West Africa-Surinam Sprachbund. Berlin: Mouton, 43–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O. and Smith, Norval 2015b. Non-iconic reduplications in Eastern Gbe and Surinam. In Muysken, Pieter and Smith, Norval (eds.), Surviving the Middle Passage: The West Africa-Surinam Sprachbund. Berlin: Mouton, 241–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O., Smith, Norval, and Veenstra, Tonjes. 2013. Saramaccan. In Michaelis, Susanne Maria, Maurer, Philippe, Haspelmath, Martin, and Huber, Magnus (eds.), The survey of pidgin and creole languages. Vol. I: English-based and Dutch-based languages. Oxford University Press, 27–38.Google Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O., Pfau, Roland, and Zeshan, Ulrike. 2005. When a Wh-word is not a Wh-word: The case of Indian Sign Language. In Bhattacharya, Tanmoy (ed.), The yearbook of South Asian languages and linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 11–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adande, Alexis B. A. 1984. Tɔgudo-Awute, capitale de l’ancien royaume d’Allada. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Université de Paris I.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra, and Dixon, R. M. W.. (eds.) 2006. Serial verb constructions: A Cross-linguistic typology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Alleyne, Mervyn C. 1971. Acculturation and the cultural matrix of creolization. In Hymes, Dell (ed.), Pidginization and creolization of languages. Cambridge University Press, 169–186.Google Scholar

Alleyne, Mervyn C. 1979. On the genesis of languages. In Hill, Kenneth C. (ed.) The genesis of language. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma, 89–107.Google Scholar

Alleyne, Mervyn C. 1980. Comparative Afro-American: An historical-comparative study of English-Based Afro-American dialects. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.Google Scholar

Ameka, Felix. 1992. Focus constructions in Ewe and Akan: A comparative perspective. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 17: 1–25.Google Scholar

Ameka, Felix. 2003. Prepositions and postpositions in Ewe (Gbe): Empirical and theoretical considerations. In Sauzet, Parick and Zribi-Hertz, Anne (eds.), Typologie des langues d’Afrique et universaux de la grammaire. Paris: L’Harmattan, 41–67.Google Scholar

Ameka, Felix. 2010. Information packaging constructions in Kwa: Micro-variation and typology. In Aboh, Enoch O. and Essegbey, James (eds.), Topics in Kwa syntax. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 78. Dordrecht: Springer, 141–176.Google Scholar

Anglade, Pierre. 1998. Inventaire étymologique des termes creoles des caraïbes d’origine africaine. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar

Anonymous. 1983. Éléments de recherche sur la langue fon. Cotonou: République du Bénin.Google Scholar

Ansaldo, Umberto. 2005. Typological convergence and admixture in Sri Lanka Malay: The case of Kirinda Java. Unpublished manuscript, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Ansaldo, Umberto. 2009. Contact languages: Ecology and evolution in Asia. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arends, Jacques. 1989. Syntactic developments in Sranan. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Nijmegen.Google Scholar

Arends, Jacques. 1995a. The socio-historical background of creoles. In Arends, Jacques, Muysken, Pieter, and Smith, Norval (eds.), Pidgins and creoles: An introduction. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 15–24.Google Scholar

Arends, Jacques. 1995b. Demographic factors in the formation of Sranan. In Arends, Jacques (ed.), The early stages of creolization. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 233–285.Google Scholar

Arends, Jacques. 1998. The development of complementation in Saramaccan. In Caron, Bernard (ed.), Proceedings of the eleventh International Congress of Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon (CD-ROM).Google Scholar

Arends, Jacques. 2009. Syntactic developments in Sranan: Creolization as a gradual process. www.dbnl.org/tekst/aren012synt01_01/colofon.htmGoogle Scholar

Mark, Aronoff, Meier, Irit, and Sandler, Wendy. 2005. The paradox of sign language morphology. Language 81: 301–344.Google Scholar

Avolonto, Aimé. 1995. Pour une approche minimaliste des verbes à objets inhérents en fongbe. PhD Dissertation, University of Quebec at Montreal.Google Scholar

Awóyalé, Yiwọla. 1988. Complex predicates and verb serialization. MIT Lexicon Working Papers 28. MIT Center for Cognitive Science. MI, 1–35.Google Scholar

Bailey, Beryl L. 1966. Jamaican Creole syntax: A transformational approach. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Baker, Mark C. 1985. The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 373–415.Google Scholar

Baker, Mark C. 1988. Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Baker, Mark C. 1989. Object sharing and projection in serial verb constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 513–553.Google Scholar

Baker, Mark C. 1991. On the relation of serialization to verb extensions. In Lefebvre, Claire (ed.), Serial verbs: Grammatical, comparative and cognitive approaches. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 79–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, Mark C. 2008. The macroparameter in a microparametric world. In Biberauer, Theresa (ed.), The limits of variation. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 351–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakker, Peter. 2014. Creolistics: Back to square one? Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 29: 177–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakker, Peter, Aymeric, Daval-Markussena, Mikael, Parkvall, and Ingo, Plag. 2011. Creoles are typologically distinct from non-creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 26: 5–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakker, Peter, Post, Marike, and van der Voort, Hein. 1994. TMA particles and auxiliaries. In Arends, Jacquues, Muysken, Pieter, and Smith, Norval (eds.), Pidgins and Creoles: An introduction. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 247–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baptista, Marlyse. 2009. Economy, innovation and degrees of complexity in creole formation. In Aboh, Enoch O and Smith, Norval (eds.), Complex processes in new languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baptista, Marlyse and Guéron, Jacqueline (eds.) 2007. Noun phrases in creole Languages: A multi-faceted approach. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernstein, Judy. 1997. Demonstratives and reinforcers in Romance and Germanic languages. Lingua 102: 87–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernstein, Judy. 2001a. Focusing the “right” way in Romance determiner phrases. Probus 13: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernstein, Judy. 2001b. The DP hypothesis: Identifying clausal properties in the nominal domain. In Baltin, Mark and Collins, Chris (eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 536–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bickerton, Derek. 1981. Roots of language. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.Google Scholar

Bickerton, Derek. 1984. The language bioprogram hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7: 173–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bickerton, Derek. 1988a. Creole languages and the bioprogram. In Newmeyer, Frederic (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey. Vol. II: Linguistics theory: Extensions and implications. Cambridge University Press, 268–284.Google Scholar

Bickerton, Derek. 1988b. A dialogue concerning the linguistic status of creole languages. In Newmeyer, Frederic (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey. Vol. II: Linguistics theory: Extensions and implications. Cambridge University Press, 302–306.Google Scholar

Bickerton, Derek. 1989. Seselwa serialization and its significance. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 4: 155–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bickerton, Derek. 1990a. Language and Species. The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bickerton, Derek. 1990b. If it quacks like a duck … A reply to Seuren. Journal of Piding and Creole Languages 5: 293–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bickerton, Derek. 1999. How to acquire language without positive evidence: What acquisitionists can learn from creoles. In DeGraff, M. (ed.), Language creation and language change, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 49–74.Google Scholar

Bickerton, Derek. 2008. Bastard tongues: A trail-blazing linguist finds clues to our common humanity in the world’s lowliest languages. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar

Bobyleva, Ekaterina. 2013. The development of the nominal domain in creole languages: A comparative-typological approach. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar

Boeckx, Cedric. 2010. What principles and parameters got wrong. Unpublished manuscript, Catalan Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar

Booij, Geert. 2005. The grammar of words. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Borer, Hagit. 1984. Parametric syntax: Case studies in Semitic and Romance languages. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borer, Hagit. 2005. Structuring sense. Vol. I: In name only. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Brousseau, Anne-Marie and Lumsden, John S.. 1992. Nominal structure in Fongbe. The Journal of West African Languages 22: 5–25.Google Scholar

Bruyn, Adrienne. 1995a. Grammaticalization in creoles: The development of determiners and relative clauses in Sranan. Studies in Language and Language Use 21. Amsterdam: IFOTT.Google Scholar

Bruyn, Adrienne. 1995b. Noun phrases. In Arends, Jacques, Muysken, Pieter, and Smith, Norval (eds.), Pidgins and Creoles: An introduction. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 259–270.Google Scholar

Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian syntax: A government and binding approach. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. 1985. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Byrne, Francis. 1987. Grammatical relations in a radical creole. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cable, Seth. 2004a. Predicate clefts and base-generation: Evidence from Yiddish and Brazilian Portuguese. Unpublished manuscript, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Cable, Seth. 2004b. Restructuring in English. Unpublished manuscript, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Campbell, Lyle. 1996. Typological and areal issues in reconstruction. In Fisiak, Jacek (ed.), Linguistic reconstruction. Berlin: Mouton, 49–72.Google Scholar

Campbell, Richard. 1989. The grammatical structure of verbal predicates. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Campbell, Richard. 1992. Serial verbs and unaccusativity. MIT Working Papers 17: 41–51.Google Scholar

Campbell, Richard. 1996a. Specificity operators in SpecDP. Studia Linguistica 2: 161–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, Richard. 1996b. Serial verbs and shared arguments. The Linguistic Review 13: 83–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Capo, Hounkpati B. C. 1991. A comparative phonology of Gbe. Berlin: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cardinaletti, Anna and Giusti, Giuliana. 2001. Semi-lexical motion verbs in Romance and Germanic. In Corver, Norbert and van Riemsdijk, Henk (eds.), Semi-lexical categories: On the function of content words and content of function words. Berlin: Mouton, 371–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cardinaletti, Anna and Shlonsky, Ur. 2004. Clitic positions and restructuring in Italian. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 519–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cardinaletti, Anna and Starke, Michal. 1999. The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns. In Van Riemsdijk, Henk (ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 145–233.Google Scholar

Chaudenson, Robert. 1992. Des îles, des hommes, des langues: Éssai sur la créolisation linguistique et culturelle. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar

Chaudenson, Robert. 2001. Creolization of language and culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Chaudenson, Robert. 2003. La créolisation: Théorie, applications, implications. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar

Cheng, Lisa L. and Sybesma, Rint. 1999. Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 509–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1977. On wh-movement. In Culicover, Peter W. (ed.), Formal syntax. New York/San Francisco: Academic Press, 71–132.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use, Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by Phase. In Kenstowixcz, Micheal (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1–52.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On Phases. In Freidin, Robert, Otero, Carlos P., and Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 133–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 1994. On the evidence for partial N-movement in the Romance DP. In Cinque, Guglielmo, Koster, Jan, Pollock, Jean-Yves, Rizzi, Luigi, and Zanuttini, Raffaella (eds.), Paths towards Universal Grammar. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 85–110.Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 1996. The “antisymmetric” program: Theoretical and typological implications. Journal of Linguistics 32: 447–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 2004. Restructuring and functional heads: The cartography of syntactic structures. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 2010. The syntax of adjectives: A comparative study. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clements, Clancy J. 1996. The genesis of a language: The formation and development of Korlai Portuguese. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, Chris. 1994. The factive construction in Kwa. Unpublished manuscript, Cornell University.Google Scholar

Collins, Chris. 1997. Argument sharing in serial verb constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 461–497.Google Scholar

Collins, Chris. 2002. Multiple verb movement in Hoan. Linguistic Inquiry 33:1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Language universals and linguistic typology. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2000. Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Curtin, Philip D. 1969. The Atlantic slave trade: A census. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Da Cruz, Maxime. 1992. ECP et l’alternance nu/na en fongbe. Unpublished manuscript, University of Quebec at Montreal.Google Scholar

Da Cruz, Maxime 1993. Les constructions sérielles du fongbe: Approches sémantique et syntaxique. PhD dissertation, University of Quebec at Montreal.Google Scholar

Da Cruz, Maxime. 1995. Aspectual verbs fó, v ‘finish’ in Fongbe. The Linguistic Review 12: 361–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Da Cruz, Maxime. 1997. Serial verb constructions and null arguments in Fon. In Déchaine, Rose-Marie and Manfredi, Victor (eds.), Object positions in Benue-Kwa. The Hague: The Holland Academic Graphics, 31–45.Google Scholar

Damonte, Federico. 2002. The complementizer layer in Saramaccan. In Leonetti, Manuel, Soriano, Olga Fernàndez, and Vidal, Victoria Escandell (eds.), Current issues in generative grammar. Tenth Colloquium on Generative Grammar: Selected papers. Madrid: Universidad Alcalà de Henares, Servicio de Publicaciones, 31–50.Google Scholar

De Castro, Yeda Pessoa. 2002. A língua Mina-Jeje no Brasil. Um falar Africano em Ouro Preto do Século XVIII. Apoio cultural. Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais. Papemig.Google Scholar

De Cauna, Jacques (ed.) 2004. Toussaint Louverture et l’indépendance d’Haïti. Paris: Karthala-SFHOM.Google Scholar

Déchaine, Rose-Marie and Manfredi, Victor (eds.) 1997. Object positions in Benue-Kwa. The Hague: Institute of Generative Linguistics/Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar

Debien, Gabriel. 1956. Études antillaises (XVIIIe siècle). Paris: Association Marc Bloch.Google Scholar

Debien, Gabriel. 1974. Les esclaves aux Antilles françaises (XVIIe–XVIIIe siècles). Basse-Terre: Société d’histoire de la Gouadeloupe.Google Scholar

DeGraff, Michel. 1992. Creole grammars and acquisition of syntax: The case of Haitian Creole. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar

DeGraff, Michel. 1995. On certain differences between Haitian and French predicative constructions. In Amastae, J., Goodall, G., Montalbetti, M., and Phinney, M. (eds.), Contemporary research in romance linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 237–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeGraff, Michel. 1997. Verb syntax in, and beyond creolization. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.), The new comparative syntax. London: Longman, 64–94.Google Scholar

DeGraff, Michel. (ed.) 1999. Language creation and language change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

DeGraff, Michel. 2001a. On the origin of creoles: A cartesian critique of neo-Darwinian linguistics. Linguistic Typology 5: 213–310.Google Scholar

DeGraff, Michel. 2001b. Morphology in creole genesis. In Kenstowicz, Michael (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 53–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeGraff, Michel. 2002. Relexification: A reevaluation. Anthropological Linguistics 44: 321–414.Google Scholar

DeGraff, Michel. 2003. Against creole exceptionalism. Language 79: 391–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeGraff, Michel. 2005. Morphology and word order in “creolization” and beyond. In Cinque, Guglielmo and Kayne, Richard (eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax. New York: Oxford University Press, 293–372.Google Scholar

DeGraff, Michel. 2007. Kreyòl Ayisyen, or Haitian Creole. In Holm, John and Patrick, Peter (eds.), Comparative creole syntax: Parallel outlines of 18 creole grammars. London: Battlebridge Publications, 101–126.Google Scholar

DeGraff, Michel. 2009. Language acquisition in creolization (and language change): Some cartesian-uniformitarian boundary conditions. Language and Linguistic Compass 3/4: 888–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

D’Elbée, François. 1671. Journal du voyage du Sieur Delbée. In de Clodoré, Jean (ed.), Relation de ce qui s’est passé dans les Isles et Terre-ferme de l’Amerique pendant la derniere guerre avec l’Angleterre, et depuis en execution du Traitté de Breda ii. Paris.Google Scholar

Den Besten, Hans. 1977. On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. In Studies in West Germanic syntax. PhD dissertation, University of Tilburg.Google Scholar

Den Dikken, Marcel. 1998. Predicate inversion in DP. In Alexiadou, Artemis and Wilder, Chris (eds.), Possessors, predicates and movement in the Determiner Phrase. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 177–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Denis, Serge. 1935. Notre créole. Orleans: G. Luzeray.Google Scholar

Déprez, Viviane. 2001. Determiner architecture and phrasal movement in French lexifier creoles. In Quer, Josep, Schroten, Jan, Scorretti, Mauro, Sleeman, Petra, and Verheugd, Else (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2001. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 49–74.Google Scholar

Déprez, Viviane. 2004. Morphological number, semantic number and bare nouns. Lingua 115: 857–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Déprez, Viviane. 2007. Nominal constituents in French lexifier creoles: Probing the structuring role of grammaticalization. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 22: 263–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Viviane, Déprez, Sleeman, Petra, and Guella, Hakima. 2011. Specificity effects in L2 determiner acquisition: UG or pragmatic egocentrism? In Pirvulescu, Mihaela, Cuervo, María Cristina, Pérez-Leroux, Ana T., Steele, Jeffrey, and Strik, Nelleke (eds.), Selected proceedings of the fourth conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition – North America (GALANA 2010). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 27–36.Google Scholar

Diouf, Sylviane A. 2007. Dreams of Africa in Alabama: The slave ship Clotilda and the story of the last Africans brought to America. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caterina, Donati and Branchini, Chiara. 2013. Challenging linearization: Simultaneous mixing in the production of bimodal bilinguals. In Biberauer, Theresa and Roberts, Ian and (eds.), Challenges to linearization. Berlin: Mouton, 93–128.Google Scholar

Donicie, Anton C. R. and Voorhoeve, Jan. 1963. De Saramakaanse Woordenschat. Bureau voor Tallonderzoek in Suriname van de Universiteit van Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Ducœurjoly, S. J. 1803. Manuel des habitants de Saint-Domingue. Paris: Arthus Bertrand.Google Scholar

Durrleman-Tame, Stephanie. 2008. The syntax of Jamaican Creole: A cartographic perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eltis, David. 2011. Africa, slavery, and the slave trade, mid-seventeenth to mid-eighteenth centuries. In Canny, Nicholas and Morgan, Philip (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the Atlantic world: 1450–1850. New York: Oxford University Press, 271–286.Google Scholar

Emmer, Peter C. 2005. Les Pays-Bas et la traite des noirs. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar

Enç, Mürvet. 1991. The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 1–26.Google Scholar

Essegbey, James. 1999. Inherent complement verbs revisited: Towards an understanding of argument structure in Ewe. Wageningen: MPI series, Ponsen & Looijen bv.Google Scholar

Fattier, Dominique. 1996. La passion de notre Seigneur selon St. Jean en langage nègre: Une scripta créole? Études créoles 19: 9–30.Google Scholar

Foley, William A. and Van Valin, Robert D..1984. Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fouchard, Jean. 1972. Les marrons de la liberté. Paris: Éditions de l’École.Google Scholar

Gibson, Kean. 1986. The ordering of auxiliary notions in Guyanese Creole. Language 62: 571–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giusti, Giuliana. 1996. Is there a FocusP and a TopicP in the noun phrase structure? University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 6: 105–128.Google Scholar

Giusti, Giuliana. 1997. The categorial status of determiners. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.), The new comparative syntax. London: Longman Linguistics Library, 95–123.Google Scholar

Glaude, Herby. 2012. Aspects de la syntaxe du l’haïtien. Paris: Anibwe.Google Scholar

Glaude, Herby and Zribi-Hertz, Anne. 2012. Verb focus in Haitian: From lexical reiteration to predicate cleft. In Aboh, Enoch O., Smith, Norval, and Zribi-Hertz, Anne (eds.), The morphosyntax of reiteration in creole and non-creole languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 77–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glock, Naomi. 1986. The use of reported speech in Saramaccan. In Huttar, George and Gregerson, Kenneth (eds.), Pragmatics in non-Western perspective. Publications in Linguistics. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics, 35–61.Google Scholar

Goad, Heather and White, Lydia. 2004. Ultimate attainment of L2 inflection: Effects of L1 prosodic structure. In Foster-Cohen, Susan, Smith, Michael Sharwood, Sorace, Antonella, and Ota, Mits (eds.), EUROSLA yearbook, Vol.IV. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 119–145.Google Scholar

Goad, Heather, White, Lydia, and Steele, Jefferey. 2003. Missing inflection in L2 acquisition: Defective syntax or L1-constrained prosodic representations? Canadian Journal of Linguistics 48: 243–263.Google Scholar

Granfeldt, Jonas. 2000. The acquisition of the Determiner Phrase in bilingual and second language French. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 3: 263–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guillemin, Diana. 2011. The syntax and semantics of a determiner system: A case study of Mauritian Creole. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haddican, Bill. 2001. Gengbe typing morphemes and determiners. Unpublished manuscript, New York University.Google Scholar

Haeberli, Eric. 1999. Features, categories and the syntax of A-positions: Synchronic and diachronic variation in the Germanic languages. PhD dissertation, University of Geneva.Google Scholar

Haegeman, Liliane. 1995. The syntax of negation. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haegeman, Liliane and Ürögdi, Barbara. 2010a. Referential CPs and DPs: An operator movement account. Theoretical Linguistics 36: 111–152.Google Scholar

Haegeman, Liliane and Ürögdi, Barbara. 2010b. Operator movement, referentiality and intervention. Theoretical Linguistics 36: 233–246.Google Scholar

Hagemeijer, Tjerk. 2001. Underspecificatoin in serial verb constructions. In Corver, Norbert and van Riemsdijk, Henk (eds.), Semi-lexical categories: On the function of content words and content of function words. Berlin: Mouton, 414–451.Google Scholar

Hale, Ken and Keyser, Samuel J.. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In Hale, Ken and Keyser, Samuel. J. (eds.), The view from building 20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 53–109.Google Scholar

Hall, Robert A. 1953. Haitian Creole: Grammar, texts, vocabulary. Volume 43. Philadelphia: American Folklore Society.Google Scholar

Hall, Robert A. 1962. The life cycle of pidgin languages. Lingua 11: 151–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harbour, Daniel. 2008. Klivaj predika, or predicate clefts in Haitian. Lingua 118: 853–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hartmann, Katharina and Zimmermann, Malte. 2007. Exhaustivity marking in Hausa: A reanalysis of the particle nee/cee. In Aboh, Enoch O., Hartmann, Katharina, and Zimmermann, Malte (eds.), Focus strategies in Niger Congo and Afro-Asiatic: On the interaction between focus and grammar in some African languages. Berlin: Mouton, 249–272.Google Scholar

Hawkins, J. A. 2004. Efficiency and complexity in grammar. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haznedar, Belma and Schwartz, Bonnie D.. 1997. Are there optional infinitives in child L2 acquisition? In Hughes, Elizabeth, Hughes, Mary, and Greenhill, Annabel (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st annual Boston University conference on language development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 257–268.Google Scholar

Heim, Irene. 1991. Articles and definiteness. Published in German as “Artikel und definitheit,” in von Stechow, Armin and Wunderlich, Dieter (eds.), Semantics: An International handbook of contemporary research. Berlin: Mouton, 487–535.Google Scholar

Hengeveld, Kees. 1989. Layers and operators in Functional Grammar. Journal of Linguistics 25: 127–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henri, Fabiola. 2012. Attenuative verbal reduplication in Mauritian: A morpho-semantic approach. In Aboh, Enoch O., Smith, Norval, and Zribi-Hertz, Anne (eds.), The morphosyntax of retiteration in creole and non-creole languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 203–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holm, John. 1988. Pidgins and creoles. Vol. I: Theory and structure. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Huttar, George, Aboh, Enoch O., and Ameka, Felix. 2013. Relative clauses in Suriname creoles and Gbe languages. Lingua 129: 96–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ionin, Tania. 2006a. This is definitely specific: Specificity and definiteness in article systems. Natural Language Semantics 14: 175–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ionin, Tania. 2006b. A comparison of article semantics in L2-acquisition and creole languages. In Lefebvre, Claire, White, Lydia, and Jourdan, Christine (eds.), L2 acquisition and creole genesis: Dialogues. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 253–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaeggli, Osvaldo, and Hyams, Nina M.. 1993. On the independence and interdependence of syntactic and morphological properties: English aspectual come and go. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11: 313–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kangni, Atah-Ekoué. 1989. La syntaxe du ge. Franckfurt AM: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard S. 1975. French syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard S. 2002. On some prepositions that look DP-internal: English of and French de. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 1: 71–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kiss, Katalin É. 1998. Identificational focus versus information focus. Language 74: 245–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, Wolfgang and Perdue, Clive. 1997. The Basic Variety (or: Couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research 13: 301–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kluge, Angela. 2000. The Gbe languages varieties of West Africa: A quantitative analysis of lexical grammar features. MA dissertation, University of Wales, College of Cardiff.Google Scholar

Kluge, Angela. 2005. A synchronic lexical study of Gbe language varieties: The effects of different similarity judgment criteria. Linguistic Discovery 3: 22–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koopman, Hilda. 1982a. Les constructions relatives. In Lefebvre, Claire, Magloire-Holly, Hélène, and Piou, Nanie (eds.), Syntaxe de l’Haïtien. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma, 167–203.Google Scholar

Koopman, Hilda. 1982b. Les questions. In Lefebvre, Claire, Magloire-Holly, Hélène, and Piou, Nanie (eds.), Syntaxe de l’Haïtien. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma, 204–241.Google Scholar

Koopman, Hilda. 1984. The syntax of verbs: From verb movement rules in the Kru languages to Universal Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Kouwenberg, Silvia. 2009. The invisible hand in creole genesis: Reanalysis in the formation of Berbice Dutch. In Aboh, Enoch O. and Smith, Norval (eds.), Complex processes in new languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 115–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kouwenberg, Silvia. 2010. Creole studies and linguistic typology: Part 2. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 25: 359–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kroch, Anthony. 1989a. Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1, 2: 199–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kroch, Anthony. 1989b. Function and grammar in the history of English: Periphrastic do. In Fasold, Ralph W. and Schiffrin, Deborah (eds.), Language Change and Variation. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, vol. 52. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 133–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kroch, Anthony. 1994. Morphosyntactic variation. In Beals, Katharine (ed.), Papers from the 30th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society: Parasession on variation and linguistic theory. Chicago Linguistic Society, 180–201.Google Scholar

Kroch, Anthony. 2001. Syntactic change. In Baltin, Mark and Collins, Chris (eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 699–729.Google Scholar

Kroch, Anthony and Taylor, Ann. 1997 Verb movement in Old and Middle English: Dialect variation and language contact. In van Kemenade, Ans and Vincent, Nigel (eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change. Cambridge University Press, 297–325.Google Scholar

Kroch, Anthony, Taylor, Ann, and Ringe, Donald. 2000. The Middle English verb-second constraint: A case study in language contact and language change. In Herring, Susan C., van Reenen, Pieter, and Schøsler, Lene (eds.), Textual parameters in older languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 353–392.Google Scholar

Labouret, Henri and Rivet, Paul. 1929. Le royaume d’Arda et son évangélisation au 17ème siècle. Paris: Institut d’Ethnologie.Google Scholar

Lardiere, Donna. 2000. Mapping features to forms in second language acquisition. In Archibald, John (ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory. Malden MA: Blackwell, 102–129.Google Scholar

Lardiere, Donna. 2005. On morphological competence. Unpublished manuscript,Georgetown University.Google Scholar

Lalla, Barbara and D’Costa, Jean. 1991. Language in exile: Three hundred years of Jamaican Creole. Tuscaloosa, AL: The University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar

Languages of Suriname: Saramaccan-English dictionary. www.sil.org/americas/suriname/Saramaccan/English/SaramEngDictIndex.htmlGoogle Scholar

Law, Robin. 1991. The Slave Coast of West Africa, 1550–1750. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Law, Robin. 1994. The slave trade in seventeenth-century Allada: A revision. African Economic Histrory 22: 59–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Law, Robin. 1997. The Kingdom of Allada. Leiden: CNWS Publications, Leiden University.Google Scholar

Law, Robin. 2011. Africa in the Atlantic world, c.1760–c.1840. In Canny, Nicholas and Morgan, Philip (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the Atlantic world: 1450–1850. New York: Oxford University Press, 585–601.Google Scholar

Lefebvre, Claire. 1989. Instrumental take serial constructions in Haitian and in Fon. Revue canadienne de linguistique 34: 319–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lefebvre, Claire. 1991. Take serial verb constructions in Fon. In Lefebvre, Claire (ed.), Serial verbs: Grammatical, comparative and cognitive approaches. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 37–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lefebvre, Claire. 1998. Creole genesis and the acquisition of grammar: The case of Haitian creole. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lefebvre, Claire and Brousseau, Anne Marie. 2002. A grammar of Fongbe. Berlin/New York: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leimgruber, Jakob R. E. 2009. Modelling variation in Singapore English. PhD dissertation, Pembroke College, University of Oxford.Google Scholar

Ler, Soon Lay Vivien. 2005. An in-depth study of discourse particles in Singapore English. PhD dissertation, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar

Lim, Lisa. 2011. Tone in Singlish: Substrate features from Sinitic and Malay. In Lefebvre, Claire (ed.), Creoles, their substrates and language typology. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 271–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lightfoot, David. 2006. How new languages emerge. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, Edward. 1774 [2002]. The History of Jamaica. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar

Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1994. Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 25: 609–665.Google Scholar

Lord, Carol. 1973. Serial verbs in transition. Studies in African Linguistics 4: 269–295.Google Scholar

Manfredi, Victor. 1993. Verb focus in the typology of Kwa/Kru and Haitian. In Byrne, Francis and Winford, Donald (eds.), Focus and grammatical relations in Creole languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 3–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In Dimitriadis, Alexis, Siegel, Laura, Surek-Clark, Clarissa, and Williams, Alexander (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium: Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 4, 2: 201–225.Google Scholar

Mather, Patrick-André 2006. Second language acquisition and creolization: Same (i-) processes, different (e-)results. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 21: 231–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mathieu, Eric. 2009. From local blocking to Cyclic Agree: The role and meaning of determiners in the history of French. In Ghomeshi, Jila, Paul, Ileana, and Wiltschko, Martina (eds.), Determiners: Universals and Variation. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 123–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McColl Millar, Robert. 2000. System. Collapse, rebirth. Weim: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

McWhorter, John. 1998. Identifying the creole prototype: Vindicating a typological class. Language 74: 788–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McWhorter, John. 2001. The world’s simplest grammars are creole grammars. Linguistic Typology 5: 125–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McWhorter, John. 2011. Linguistic complexity and simplicity: Why do languages undress? Berlin: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McWhorter, John. 2012. Case closed? Testing the feature pool hypothesis. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 27: 171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meisel, Jürgen M. 2011. Bilingual language acquisition and theories of diachronic change: Bilingualism as cause and effect of grammatical change. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14: 121–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Migge, Bettina. 1998. Substrate influence in the formation of the Suriname plantation creole: A consideration of sociohistorical data and linguistic data from Ndyuka and Gbe. PhD dissertation, Ohio State University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Migge, Bettina. 2003. Creole formation as language contact: The case of the Suriname creoles. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Migge, Bettina and Winford, Don. 2007. Substrate influence on the emergence of the TMA systems of Surinamese creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 22: 73–99.Google Scholar

Migge, Bettina and Winford, Don 2009. The origin and development of possibility in the creoles of Suriname. In Selbach, Rachel, Cardoso, Hugo C., and van den Berg, Margot (eds.), Gradual creolization: Studies celebrating Jacques Arends. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 129–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mufwene, Salikoko S. 1986. Number delimitation in Gullah. American Speech 61: 33–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mufwene, Salikoko S. 1987. An issue on predicate clefting: Evidence from Atlantic creoles and African languages. In Maurer, Philippe and Stolz, Thomas (eds.), Varia Creolica. Bochum: Brockmeyer, 71–89.Google Scholar

Mufwene, Salikoko S. 1989. Equivocal structure in some Gullah complex sentences. American Speech 64: 304–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mufwene, Salikoko S. 1991. Language genesis and human evolution. (Review article on Bickerton 1990.) Diachronica 8: 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mufwene, Salikoko S. 1994. Genèse de population et genèse de langue. Plurilinguismes 8: 95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mufwene, Salikoko S. 1996. The founder principle in creole genesis. Diachronica 13: 83–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mufwene, Salikoko S. 1999. On the language bioprogram hypothesis: Hints from Tazie. In DeGraff, Michel (ed.), Language creation and language change: Creolization, diachrony, and development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 95–127.Google Scholar

Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2001. The ecology of language evolution. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2002 Competition and selection in language evolution. Selection 3: 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2003. Créoles, écologie sociale, évolution linguistique. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar

Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2005a. Créoles, écologie sociale, évolution linguistique: Cours donnés au Collège de France durant l’automne 2003. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar

Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2005b. Language evolution: The population genetics way. In Hauska, Guenther (ed.), Gene, Sprachen, und ihre Evolution. Universitaetsverlag Regensburg, 30–52.Google Scholar

Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2005c. How many bes are there in English? In Mufwene, Salikoko S., Francis, Elaine J., and Wheeler, Rebecca S. (eds.), Polymorphous linguistics: Jim McCawley’s legacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 225–246.Google Scholar

Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2008. Language evolution: Contact, competition, and change. New York: Continuum International Publishing Company Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2009. Restructuring, hybridization, and complexity in language evolution. In Aboh, Enoch O. and Smith, Norval (eds.), Complex processes in new languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 367–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2010. SLA and the emergence of creoles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32: 359–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2014. Globalisation économique mondiale des XVIIe-XVIIIe siècles, émergence des créoles, et vitalité langagière. In Carpooran, Arnaud and Bosquet-Ballah, Yannick (eds.), Langues créoles, mondialisation et éducation, Proceedings of the 13th colloquium of the Comité International des Études Créoles, Mauritius 2012. Louis, Mauritius: Creole Speaking Unit, 23–79.Google Scholar

Müller, Natascha. 1998. Transfer in bilingual first language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1: 151–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müller, Natascha and Hulk, Aafke. 2000. Bilingual first language acquisition at the interface between syntax and pragmatics. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 3: 227–244.Google Scholar

Müller, Natascha and Hulk, Aafke 2001. Cross-linguistic influence in bilingual first language acquisition: Italian and French as recipient languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 4: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muysken, Pieter. 1981a. Half-way between Quechua and Spanish: The case for relexification. In Highfield, Arnold and Valdaman, Albert (eds.), Historicity and variation in creole studies. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma, 52–78.Google Scholar

Muysken, Pieter. 1981b. Creole tense/mood/aspect system: The unmarked case? In Muysken, Pieter (ed.), Generative studies on creole languages. Dordrecht: Foris, 181–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muysken, Pieter. 1987. Prepositions and postpositions in Saramaccan. In Alleyne, Mervyn C. (ed.), Studies in Saramaccan language structure, Caribbean Culture Studies 2. University of Amsterdam, 89–101.Google Scholar

Muysken, Pieter. 1988. Are creoles a special type of language? In Newmeyer, Frederick (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey. Vol. II: Linguistic theory: Extensions and implications. Cambridge University Press, 285–301.Google Scholar

Muysken, Pieter. 1997. Media Lengua. In Thomason, Sarah G. (ed.), Contact languages: A wider perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 365–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muysken, Pieter. 2008. Functional categories. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muysken, Pieter and Smith, Norval. 1986. Substrata versus universals in creole genesis. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Notley, Anna, van der Linden, Elisabeth, and Hulk, Aafke. 2007. Cross-linguistic influence in bilingual children: The case of dislocation. In Baauw, Sergio, Drijkoningen, Frank, and Pinto, Manuela (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2005. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 229–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palmer, Frank Robert. 1987. Mood and modality. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pazzi, Roberto. 1979. Introduction à l’histoire de l’aire culturelle Aja-Tado. Institut National des Sciences de l’Éducation.Google Scholar

Pazzi, Roberto. 1984. Aperçu sur l’implantation actuelle et les migrations anciennes des peuples de l’aire culturelle Aja-tado. In de Medeiros, François (ed.), Peuples du Golfe du Bénin. Paris: Karthala, 11–20.Google Scholar

Pesetsky, David. 1987. Wh-in-situ: Movement and unselective binding. In Reuland, Eric and ter Meulen, Alice (eds.), The representation of (in)definiteness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 98–129.Google Scholar

Pintzuk, Susan. 1999. Phrase structures in competition: Variation and change in Old English word order. New York: Garland.Google Scholar

Plag, Ingo. 2008a. Creoles as interlanguages: Inflectional morphology. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 23: 109–130.Google Scholar

Plag, Ingo. 2008b. Creoles as interlanguages: Syntactic structures. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 23: 307–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plag, Ingo. 2009a. Creoles as interlanguages: Phonology. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 24: 121–140.Google Scholar

Plag, Ingo. 2009b. Creoles as interlanguages: Word-formation. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 24: 339–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plag, Ingo. 2011. Creolization and admixture typology, feature pools, and second language acquisition. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 26: 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Platzack, Christer. 2001. The vulnerable C-domain. Brain and Language 77: 364–377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 356–424.Google Scholar

Postma, Johannes. 1970. The Dutch participation in the African slave trade: Slaving on the Guinea Coast, 1675–1795. PhD dissertation, Michigan State University.Google Scholar

Postma, Johannes. 1975. The origin of African slaves: The Dutch activities on the Guinea Coast, 1675–1795. In Engerman, Stanley L. and Genovese, Eugene D. (eds.), Race and slavery in the western hemisphere: Quantitative studies. Princeton University Press, 33–49.Google Scholar

Prévost, Philippe and White, Lydia. 2000. Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research 16:103–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Price, Richard. 1973. Marron societies: Rebel slave communities in the Americas. Doubleday: Anchor Press.Google Scholar

Price, Richard. 1975. Kikoongo and Saramaccan: A reappraisal. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 131: 461–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Price, Richard. 1976. The Guiana Maroons: A historical and bibliographical introduction. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Price, Richard. 1983. First-Time: The historical vision of an Afro-American people. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Price, Richard. (ed.) 1996. Maroon societies: Rebel slave communities in the Americas, 3rd edn. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Price, Richard. 2002. Maroons in Suriname and Guyane: How many and where. New West Indian Guide 76: 81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Price, Richard. 2008. Travels with Tooy: History, memory, and the African American imagination. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Price, Richard and Price, Sally. 1991. Two evenings in Saramaka. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Price, Richard and Price, Sally 2003. The root of roots, or, how Afro-American anthropology got its start. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.Google Scholar

Price, Sally and Price, Richard. 1999. Maroon arts: Cultural vitality in the African diaspora. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Prince, F. Ellen. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Cole, Peter (ed.), Radical pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 223–255.Google Scholar

Ribbert, Anne and Kuiken, Folkert. 2010. L2-induced changes in the L1 of Germans living in the Netherlands. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 13: 41–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ritter, Elizabeth. 1991. Two functional categories in Noun Phrases: Evidence from Modern Hebrew. Syntax and Semantics 25: 37–62.Google Scholar

Ritter, Elizabeth. 1992. Cross-linguistic evidence for Number Phrase. Canadian Linguistics Review 37: 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ritter, Elizabeth. 1995. On syntactic category of pronouns and agreement. Natural Languages and Linguistics Theory 13: 405–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1996. Residual verb second and the wh-criterion. In Belletti, Adriana and Rizzi, Luigi (eds.), Parameters and functional heads: Essays in comparative syntax. New York: Oxford University Press, 63–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.), Elements of grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 281–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, Ian. 1993. Verbs and diachronic syntax: A comparative history of English and French. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Roberts, Ian. 2007. Diachronic syntax. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Roberts, Ian and Roussou, Ana. 2003. Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roeper, Thomas. 1999. Universal bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2: 169–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roodenburg, Jasper. 2004. Pour une approche scalaire de la déficience nominale: La position du français dans une théorie des “noms nus.” LOT PhD series 99. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar

Ross, J. Robert. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Rountree, S. Catherine. 1992. Saramaccan grammar sketch. Languages of the Guianas 8. Paramaribo: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar

Rountree, S. Catherine and Glock, Naomi. 1982. Saramaccan for beginners: A pedagogical grammar of the Saramaccan language. Paramaribo: Institut voor Taalwetenschap and Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar

Saah, Kofi. 2010. Relative clauses in Akan. In Aboh, Enoch O. and Essegbey, James (eds.), Topics in Kwa syntax. Dordrecht: Springer, 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schumann, Christian. 1783. Neger-Englishes Wörterbuch. Manuscript published in André Kramp (1983) Early creole lexicography: A study of C. L. Schumann’s manuscript dictionary of Sranan, pp. 44–305. Dissertation, University of Leiden.Google Scholar

Schumann, John H. 1978. The pidginization process: A model for second language acquisition. Rowley: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Sebba, Mark. 1987. The syntax of serial verbs: An investigation into serialization in Sranan and other languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sebba, Mark. 1997. Contact languages: Pidgins and creoles. Houndmills: PALGRAVE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seuren, Pieter. 1990a. Still no serials in Seselwa: A reply to “Seselwa serialization and its significance.” Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 5: 271–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seuren, Pieter. 1990b. Verb syncopation and predicate raising in Mauritian Creole. Linguistics 28: 809–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seuren, Pieter. 1991. The definition of serial verbs. In Byrne, Francis and Huebner, Thom (eds.), Development and structures of Creole. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shappeck, Marco. 2011. Quichua-Spanish language contact in Salcedo, Ecuador: Revisiting Media Lengua Syncretic Language Practices. PhD dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar

Schwartz, Bonnie and Sprouse, Rex. 1996. L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research 12: 40–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Siegel, Jeff. 2004. Morphological elaboration. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 19: 333–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Siegel, Jeff. 2008. The emergence of pidgin and creole languages. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silveira, Luis. 1945. Œuvre nouvelle de langue generale du mina. Manuscript de la bibliothèque publique de Evora et de la bibliothèque nationale de Lisbone. Département des publications et bibliothèque Agence générale des colonies.Google Scholar

Singler, John Victor. 1988. The homogeneity of the substrate as a factor pidgin/creole genesis. Language 64: 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Singler, John Victor. 1996. Theories of creole genesis, sociohistorical considerations, and the evaluation of evidence: The case of Haitian Creole and the Relexification Hypothesis. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 11: 185–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Norval. 1987. The genesis of the creole languages of Surinam. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Smith, Norval. 1996. W-focus in Saramaccan: Substrate feature or grammaticalization? In Baker, Philip and Syea, Anand (eds.), Changing meanings, changing functions: Papers relating to grammaticalization in contact languages. London: University of Westminster Press, 113–128.Google Scholar

Smith, Norval. 1999. Pernabuco to Surinam 1654–1665? The Jewish slave controversy. In Huber, Margnus and Parkvall, Mikeal (eds.), Spreading the word: Papers on the issue of diffusion of Atlantic creoles. London. University of Westminster Press, 251–298.Google Scholar

Smith, Norval. 2009. Simplification of a complex part of grammar or not? What happened to KiKoongo nouns in Saramaccan? In Aboh, Enoch O and Smith, Norval (eds.), Complex processes in new languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 51–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Norval and Gardoso, Hugo. 2004. A new look at the Portuguese element in Saramaccan. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 3: 115–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Norval and Veenstra, Tonjes. 1994. Ma-nominalizations in Saramaccan. Handout, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Smith, Norval and Veenstra, Tonjes 1998. Synthetic compounds in a radical creole: Abrupt versus gradual change. Creole Conference, Regensburg: June 24–27.Google Scholar

Sorace, Antonella. 2000. Differential effects of attrition in the L1 syntax of near-native L2 speakers. In Howell, S. Catherine, Fish, Sarah, and Keith-Lucas, Thea (eds.), Proceedings of the 24th annual Boston University conference on language development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 719–725.Google Scholar

Sorace, Antonella. 2005. Selective optionality in language development. In Cornips, Leonie and Corrigan, Karen P. (eds.), Syntax and variation: Reconciling the biological and the social. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sorace, Antonella and Serratrice, Ludovica. 2009. Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Beyond structural overlap. International Journal of Bilingualism 13: 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sportiche, Dominique. 1988. A theory of floating quantifiers and its corollaries for constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 425–449.Google Scholar

Sterlin, Marie-Denise. 1989. Les caractéristiques de pou: Un modal en position de complémenteur. Revue québécoise de linguistique 18: 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stewart, Michele Marie. 2007. Quantification in Jamaican creole. The syntax and semantics of evri (‘every’) in interaction with indefinites. PhD dissertation, The University of the West Indies.Google Scholar

Stewart, Osamuyimen Thompson. 1997. Object agreement and the serial verb construction: Some minimalist considerations. In Déchaine, Rose-Marie and Manfredi, Victor (eds.), Object position in Benue-Kwa. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics, 153–168.Google Scholar

Stewart, Osamuyimen Thompson. 1998. The serial verb construction parameter: PhD dissertation, McGill University, Montréal.Google Scholar

Sylvain, Suzanne. 1936. Le créole haïtien: Morphologie et syntaxe. Geneva: Slatkine Reprints.Google Scholar

Szabolcsi, Anna. 1987. Functional categories in the noun phrase. In Kenesei, István (ed.), Approaches to Hungarian. Szeged: JATE, 167–189.Google Scholar

Szabolcsi, Anna. 1994. The noun phrase. In Kiefer, Ferenc and Kiss, Katalin E. (eds.), Syntax and semantics 27: The syntactic structure of Hungarian. New York: Academic Press, 179–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tagète, Jean and Urciolo, Raphael G.. 1993. Haitian Creole–English Dictionary. Kensington, MD: Dunwoody Press.Google Scholar

Takahash, Shoichi and Gračanin-Yuksek, Martina. 2008. Morphosyntax of movement dependencies in Haitian Creole. Syntax 11: 223–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomason, Sarah G. and Kaufman, Terrence. 1988. Language contact, creolization and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thornton, John K. and Heywood, Linda M.. 2007. Central Africans, Atlantic Creoles and the foundation of the Americas 1585–1660. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tracy, Rosemarie. 1998. Transfer versus coexistent systems. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1: 185–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tsimpli, Ianthi Maria and Antonella, Sorace. 2006. Differentiating interfaces: L2 performance in syntax-semantics and syntax-discourse phenomena. In Bamman, David, Magnitskaia, Tatiana, and Zaller, Colleen (eds.), Proceedings of the annual Boston University conference on language development 30. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 653–664.Google Scholar

Valenzuela, Elena. 2005. L2 ultimate attainment and the syntax-discourse interface: The acquisition of topic constructions in non-native Spanish and English. PhD dissertation, McGill University.Google Scholar

Van den Avenne, Cécile. 2005. Bambara et français-tirailleur. Une analyse de la politique linguistique de l’armée colonial française: la Grande Guerre et après. Documents pour l’histoire du français langue étrangère ou seconde 35: 123–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van den Berg, Margot. 2003. Early 18th century Sranan -man. In Plag, Ingo (ed.), Phonology and morphology of creole languages. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 231–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van den Berg, Margot. 2007. A grammar of early Sranan. Zetten: Drukkerij Manta.Google Scholar

Van den Berg, Margot and Aboh, Enoch O.. 2001. Compounding and derivation in two morphologically “poor” languages. Morfologiedagen Utrecht, December 13–14, 2001.Google Scholar

Van den Berg, Margot and Aboh, Enoch O. 2013. Done already? A comparison of completive markers in the Gbe languages and Sranan Tongo. Lingua 129: 150–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Kemenade, Ans. 1987. Syntactic case and morphological case in the history of English. Dordrecht: Foris; later Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Veenstra, Tonjes. 1996. Serial verbs in Saramaccan: Predication and Creole genesis. HIL Dissertations 17. Den Haag: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar

Veenstra, Tonjes. 2000. Verb serialization and object Position. Linguistics 38: 867–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vicente, Luis. 2005. Toward a unified theory of movement: An argument from Spanish predicate clefts. Leiden Papers in Linguistics 2: 43–67.Google Scholar

Wagner, Suzanne. 2004. English dialects in the Southwest: Morphology and syntax. In Korthmann, Bernd, Schneider, Edgar W., Burridge, Kate, Mesthrie, Rajend, and Upton, Clive (eds.), A handbook of varieties of English. Vol. II: Morphology and syntax. Berlin: Mouton, 154–174.Google Scholar

Wakefield, John C. 2012. A floating tone discourse morpheme: The English equivalent of Cantonese lo1. Lingua 122: 1739–1762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weerman, Fred. 2011. Diachronic change: Early versus late acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14: 149–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whinom, Keith. 1971. Linguistic hybridization and the “Special Case” of Pidgins and Creoles. In Hymes, Dell H. (ed.), Pidginization and creolization of languages. Cambridge University Press, 91–115.Google Scholar

Wijnen, Beppie and Alleyne, Mervyn. 1987. A note on fu in Saramaccan. In Alleyne, Mervin C. (ed.), Studies in Saramaccan language structure. Caribbean Culture Studies 2, University of Amsterdam, 41–51.Google Scholar

Winford, Donald. 1985. The syntax of Fi complements in Caribbean English Creole. Language 61: 588–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Winford, Donald. 1993. Predication in Caribbean English Creoles. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Winford, Donald and Migge, Bettina. 2007. Substrate influence on the emergence of the TMA systems of the Surinamese creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 22: 73–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wurmbrand, Suzanne. 2001. Infinities. Restructuring and clause structure. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar

Wurmbrand, Suzanne. 2004. Two types of restructuring: Lexical versus functional. Lingua 114: 991–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yuka, Lendzemo Constantine and Omoregbe, Esohe Mercy. 2010. The internal structure of the Edo verb. California Linguistic Notes 35: 1–19.Google Scholar

Zwart, Jan-Wouter. 1997a. Morphosyntax of verb Movement: A minimalist approach to the syntax of Dutch. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zwart, Jan-Wouter. 1997b. The Germanic SOV languages and the universal base hypothesis. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.), The new comparative syntax. London: Longman Linguistics Library, 246–267.Google Scholar

Zwart, Jan-Wouter. 2006. Complementizer agreement and dependency marking typology. In van Koppen, Marjo, Landsbergen, Frank, Poss, Mika, and van der Wal, Jenneke (eds.), Special issue of Leiden Working Papers in Linguistics 3: 53–72.Google Scholar