Alkemeyer, T., Brümmer, K., Kodalle, R., & Pille, T. (2009). Ordnung in Bewegung: Choreographien des Sozialen: Körper in Sport, Tanz, Arbeit und Bildung (1. Aufl. ed.). Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar

Alkemeyer, T., Budde, G., & Freist, D. (Eds.). (2013). Selbst-Bildungen. Soziale und kulturelle Praktiken der Subjektivierung. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar

Andrén, M. (2010). Children’s Gestures from 18 to 30 Months (Travaux de l’Institut de Linguistique de Lund ed. Vol. 50). Lund: Lund University.Google Scholar

Andrén, M. (2014). On the lower limit of gesture. In Seyfeddinipur, M. and Gullberg, M. (Eds.), From Gesture in Conversation to Visible Action as Utterance (pp. 153–167). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Austin, J. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. (1970). A Plea for Excuses. Philosophical Papers (2nd edition) (pp. 175–204). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. (1971). Performative – constative. In Searle, J. R. (Ed.), Philosophy of Language (pp. 13–22). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Balzac, H. d. (1968 (1833)). Théorie de la démarche. La Comédie Humaine (Vol. XII) (pp. 259–302). Paris: Les Editions du Delta.Google Scholar

Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barresi, J., & Moore, C. (1996). Intentional relations and social understanding. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 107–154.Google Scholar

Bateson, G. (1953). The position of humor in human communication systems. In von Foerster, H. (Ed.), Cybernetics: Circular Causal and Feedback Mechanisms in Biological and Social Sciences; Transactions of the Ninth Conference. New York: Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation.Google Scholar

Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar

Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity. London: Wildwood House.Google Scholar

Bavelas, J., Chovil, N., Lawrie, D. A., & Wade, A. (1992). Interactive gestures. Discourse Processes, 15, 469–489.Google Scholar

Bavelas, J. B., Coates, L., & Johnson, T. (2002). Listener responses as a collaborative process: The role of gaze. Journal of Communication, 52(3), 566–580.Google Scholar

Bergen, B., Narayan, S., & Feldman, J. (2003). Embodied verbal semantics: Evidence from an image-verb matching task. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar

Berger, C., & Schmidt, S. (2009). Körperwissen und Bewegungslogik. Zu Status und Spezifik körperlicher Kompetenzen. In Alkemeyer, T., Brümmer, K., Kodalle, R., & Pille, T. (Eds.), Ordnung in Bewegung: Choreographien des Sozialen: Körper in Sport, Tanz, Arbeit und Bildung (1. Aufl. ed., pp. 65–90). Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The Social Construction of Reality. Garden City, NJ: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1990). The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brandstetter, G. (2007). Tanz als Wissenskultur. Körpergedächtnis und wissenstheoretische Herausforderung. In Gehm, S., Huseman, P., & von Wilke, K. (Eds.), Wissen in Bewegung. Perspektiven der wissenschaftlichen und künstlerischen Forschung im Tanz (pp. 25–36). Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar

Bressem, J., & Mueller, C. (2014a). The family of away gestures: Negation, refusal, and negative assessment. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body Language Communication. An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1592–1604). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Bressem, J., & Mueller, C. (2014b). A repertoire of German recurrent gestures with pragmatic functions. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body Language Communication. An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1575–1591). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Brockman, J. (1977). Introduction. In Brockman, J. (Ed.), About Bateson (pp. 3–20). New York: E. P. Dutton.Google Scholar

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987 (1978)). Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bühler, K. (1985). Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Berlin: Ullstein.Google Scholar

Butterworth, G. (1995). Origins of mind in perception and action. In Moore, C. & Dunham, P. J. (Eds.), Joint Attention: Its Origins and Role in Development (pp. 29–40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Calbris, G. (1990). The Semiotics of French Gestures. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Calbris, G. (2003a). From cutting an object to a clear cut analysis: Gesture as the representation of a preconceptual schema linking concrete actions to abstract notions. Gesture, 3(1), 19–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calbris, G. (2003b). L’Expression Gestuelle de la Pensee d’un Homme Politique. Paris.Google Scholar

Calbris, G. (2011). Elements of Meaning in Gesture. Amsterdam: Benjamins B. V.Google Scholar

Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2005). What chimpanzees know about seeing revisited: An explanation of the third kind. In Eilan, N., Hoerl, C., McCormack, T., & Roessler, J. (Eds.), Joint Attention (pp. 45–64). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Certeau, M. d. (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Chance, M. R. A., & Larsen, R. R. (Eds.). (1976). The Social Structure of Attention. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Cicero, M. T. (1942). De Oratore. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cienki, A., & Müller, C. (Eds.). (2009). Metaphor and Gesture. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Clark, H. (2003). Pointing and placing. In Kita, S. (Ed.), Pointing: Where Language, Culture, and Cognition Meet (pp. 243–268). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Comrie, B. (1981). Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Condillac, E. (1746). An essay on the origin of human knowledge, being a supplement to Mr. Locke’s essay on the human understanding. London: J. Noursse.Google Scholar

Cook-Gumperz, J., Corsaro, W., & Streeck, J. (Eds.). (1986). Children’s World and Children’s Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Cooperrider, K., & Nuñez, R. (2009). Across time, across the body: Transversal temporal gestures. Gesture, 9(2), 181–206.Google Scholar

Corbeill, A. (2004). Nature Embodied: Gesture in Ancient Rome. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Corsaro, W., & Streeck, J. (1986). Studying children’s worlds: Methodological issues. In Cook-Gumperz, J., Corsaro, W., & Streeck, J. (Eds.), Children’s World and Children’s Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Coulter, J., & Parsons, E. D. (1990). The praxiology of perception: Visual orientations and practical action. Inquiry, 33(3), 251–272.Google Scholar

Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2004). Prosody and sequence organization in English conversation: The case of new beginnings. In Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Ford, C. E. (Eds.), Sound Patterns in Interaction (pp. 335–376). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M. (Eds.) (1996). Prosody in Conversation. Interactional Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Croft, W. (1990). Typology and Universals (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cuffari, E. (2012). Gestural sense-making: Hand gestures as intersubjective linguistic enactments. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 11, 599–622.Google Scholar

Cuffari, E., & Streeck, J. (2017). Taking the world by hand: How (some) hand gestures mean. In Meyer, C., Streeck, J., & Jordan, J. S. (Eds.), Intercorporeality: Emerging Socialities in Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

D’Andrade, R. G. (1984). Cultural meaning systems. In Shweder, R. A. & LeVine, R. A. (Eds.), Culture Theory. Essays on Mind, Self, and Emotion (pp. 88–121). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

D’Andrade, R. (1987). A folk model of the mind. In Holland, D. & Quinn, N. (Eds.), Cultural Models in Language and Thought (pp. 112–150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

de France, C. (1983). L’analyse praxéologique. Composition, ordre et articulation d’un proces. Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.Google Scholar

de Ruiter, J. P., Mitterer, H., & Enfield, N. J. (2006). Projecting the end of a speaker’s turn: A cognitive cornerstone of conversation. Language, 515–535.Google Scholar

Deleuze, G. (2003). Francis Bacon: The Logic of Sensation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Deppermann, A., & Günthner, S. (Eds.). (2015). Temporality in Interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins B. V.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the Modern Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Drew, P. (2013). Turn design. In Sidnell, J. & Stivers, T. (Eds.), Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 131–149). Chichester: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, H. L. (1991). Being-in-the-World. A Commentary on Heidegger’s ‘Being and Time’. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, H. L. (2002). Intelligence without representation – Merleau-Ponty’s critique of mental representation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1, 367–383.Google Scholar

Dunbar, R. (1998). Theory of mind and the evolution of language. In Hurford, J. R., Studdert-Kennedy, M. & Knight, C. (Eds.), Approaches to the Evolution of Language (pp. 92–110). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Durkheim, E. (1982 (1895)). The Rules of Sociological Method. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Efron, D. (1972 (1941)). Gesture, Race and Culture. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica, 1, 49–98.Google Scholar

Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1975). Unmasking the Face: A Guide to Recognizing Emotions from Facial Clues. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Elsner, M. (2000). Das vierbeinige Tier. Bewegungsdialog und Diskurs des Tango Argentino. Frankfurt/M.: Lang.Google Scholar

Emirbayer, M., & Mische, . (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023.Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J. (2009). The Anatomy of Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Engestroem, Y. (1987). Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.Google Scholar

Fillmore, C. (1971). Santa Cruz Lectures on Deixis. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar

Fillmore, C. (1982). Towards a descriptive framework for spatial deixis. In Jarvella, R. J. & Klein, W. (Eds.), Speech, Place, and Action (pp. 31–60). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

Fillmore, C. (1991). On Grammatical Constructions. Ms. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar

Finnegan, R. (1977). Oral Poetry. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Flusser, V. (2014). Gestures. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Ford, C., Fox, B., & Hellermann, J. (2004). ‘Getting past no’: Sequence, action, and sound production. In Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Ford, C. E. (Eds.), Sound Patterns in Interaction (pp. 233–271). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ford, C. E., Fox, B. A., & Thompson, S. A. (1998). Social interaction and grammar. In Tomasello, M. (Ed.), The New Psychology of Language (Vol. 2, pp. 119–144). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (2010). The Government of Self and Others. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar

Freud, S. (1913). The Interpretation of Dreams. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Freud, S. (1960). Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Fuchs, T. (2017). Intercorporeality and interaffectivity. In Meyer, C., Streeck, J., & Jordan, J. S. (Eds.), Intercorporeality. Emerging Socialities in Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gallagher, S. (2005). How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Gehlen, A. (1988 (1958)). Man: His Nature and Place in the World. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Gelhard, A., Alkemeyer, T., & Ricken, N. (Eds.). (2013). Techniken der Subjektivierung. München: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar

Gibson, J. J. (1962). Observations on active touch. Psychological Review, 69, 477–491.Google Scholar

Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In Shaw, R. & Bransford, J. (Eds.), Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Gibson, J. J. (1986). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Gilbert, M. (1990). Walking together: A paradigmatic social phenomenon. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 15(1), 1–14.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1963). Interaction Ritual. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1964). The neglected situation. American Anthropologist, 66(6, part 2), 133–136.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1969). Strategic Interaction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1983). The interaction order. American Sociological Review, 48, 1–17.Google Scholar

Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Goldin-Meadow, S., Alibali, M. W., & Church, R. B. (1993). Transitions in concept acquisition: Using the hand to read the mind. Psychological Review, 100, 279–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goodman, N. (1976 (1968)). Languages of Art (2nd ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar

Goodwin, C. (1980). Restarts, pauses, and the achievement of a state of mutual gaze at turn-beginning. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 272–302.Google Scholar

Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633.Google Scholar

Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489–1522.Google Scholar

Goodwin, C. (2003). Pointing as situated practice. In Kita, S. (Ed.), Pointing: Where Language and Cognition Meet (pp. 217–242). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Goodwin, C. (2007). Environmentally coupled gestures. In Duncan, S. D., Cassell, J., & Levy, E. T. (Eds.), Gesture and the Dynamic Dimension of Language: Essays in Honor of David McNeill (pp. 195–212). Philadelphia: Benjamins B. V.Google Scholar

Goodwin, C. (2011a). Contextures of action. In Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C. (Eds.), Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World (pp. 182–193). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Goodwin, C. (2011b). The Formal Organization of Human Action. UCLA: unpublished ms.Google Scholar

Goodwin, C. (2012). The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics.Google Scholar

Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. (1996). Seeing as situated activity: Formulating planes. In Engeström, Y. & Middleton, D. (Eds.), Cognition and Communication at Work (pp. 61–95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Goodwin, M. H. (1996). Informings and announcements in their environment. In Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Selting, M. (Eds.), Prosody in Conversation: Interactional Studies (pp. 436–460). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gullberg, M. (2003). Eye movements and gestures in human face-to-face interaction. In Hyönä, J., Radach, R. & D. H. (Eds.), The Mind’s Eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research. London: North-Holland/Elsevier.Google Scholar

Gullberg, M., & Holmqvist, K. (1999). Keeping an eye on gestures: Visual perception of gestures in face-to-face communication. Pragmatics and Cognition, 7(1), 35–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Güney, S. (1997). Managing Multiple Frames in Everyday Interaction: Shifting Personas of a Car Mechanic. Master’s Thesis: The University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1981). Theorien des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Haddington, P., & Keisanen, T. (2009). Location, mobility and the body as resources in selecting a route. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1938–1961.Google Scholar

Haddington, P., Mondada, L., & Nevile, M. (Eds.). (2013). Interaction and Mobility: Language and the Body in Motion. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Haller, M. (2009). Bewegte Ordnungen: Kontingenz und Intersubjektivität im Tango Argentino. In Alkemeyer, T., Brümmer, K., Kodalle, R. & Pille, T. (Eds.), Ordnung in Bewegung: Choreographien des Sozialen: Körper in Sport, Tanz, Arbeit und Bildung (1. Aufl. ed., pp. 91–106). Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar

Hanks, W. F. (1990). Referential Practice: Language and Lived Space among the Maya. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hanks, W. F. (1996). Language and Communicative Practices. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Hanks, W. F. (2005). Pierre Bourdieu and the practices of language. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 67–83.Google Scholar

Harper, D. A. (1987). Working Knowledge: Skill and Community in a Small Shop. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Harrison, S. (2010). Evidence for node and scope of negation in coverbal gestures. Gesture, 10(1).Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A. (1955). The ascription of responsibility and rights. In Flew, A. N. (Ed.), Logic and Language. First Series. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hausendorf, H. (2003). Deixis and speech situation revisited. In Lenz, F. (Ed.), Deictic Conceptualization of Space, Time, and Person (pp. 249–269). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Hausendorf, H., & Schmitt, R. (2010). Opening up openings. Zur multimodalen Konstitution der Eröffnungsphase eines Gottesdienstes. In Mondada, L. & Schmitt, R. (Eds.), Situationseröffnungen. Zur multimodalen Herstellung fokussierter Interaktion (pp. 53–101). Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

Havelock, E. A. (1963). Preface to Plato. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Haviland, J. B. (1993). Anchoring, iconicity, and orientation in Guugu Yimidhirr pointing gestures. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 3, 3–45.Google Scholar

Haviland, J. B. (2003). How to point in Zinancantan. In Kita, S. (Ed.), Pointing: Where Language, Culture, and Cognition Meet (pp. 39–70). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Haviland, J. B. (2013). The emerging grammar of nouns in a first generation sign language: Specification, iconicity, and syntax. Gesture, 13(3), 309–353.Google Scholar

Heath, C. (1986). Body Movement and Speech in Medical Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Heath, C., & Luff, P. (2012). Embodied action and organizational activity. In Sidnell, J. & Stivers, T. (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 283–307). Chichester: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. (1962 (1926)). Being and Time. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Heine, B., Claudi, U., & Hünnemeyer, F. (1991). Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Heller, A. (1984). Everyday Life. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Heritage, J. (2008). Conversation analysis as social theory. In Turner, B. (Ed.), The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory (pp. 300–320). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Heritage, J., & Clayman, S. E. (2010). Talk in Action. Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Heritage, J., & Greatbatch, D. (1989). On the institutional character of institutional talk: the case of news interviews. In??? (Ed.), Discourse in Professional and Everyday Culture. Linkoping Studies in Communication (pp. 47–98). Linkoping: University of Linkoping.Google Scholar

Hewitt, A. (2005). Social Choreography: Ideology as Performance in Dance and Everyday Movement. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Hickok, G. (2009). Eight problems for the mirror neuron theory of action understanding in monkeys and humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(7), 1229–1243.Google Scholar

Hirschauer, S. (2013). Verhalten, Handeln, Interagieren. Zu den mikrosoziologischen Grundlagen der Praxistheorie.Google Scholar

Hockey, J., & Allen-Collinson, J. (2013). Distance running as play/work: Training-together as a joint accomplishment. In Tolmie, P. & Rouncefield, M. (Eds.), Ethnomethodology at Play (pp. 211–224). Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Honneth, A., & Joas, H. (1988). Social Action and Human Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C. (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Horowitz, A. (2013). On Looking: Eleven Walks with Expert Eyes. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar

Humboldt, W. v. (1988 (1836)). On Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Husserl, E. (2012 (1912)). Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. Hoboken: Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutchins, E. (1991). The social organization of distributed cognition. In Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M., & Teasley, S. D. (Eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition (pp. 283–307). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hutchins, E. (2005). Material anchors for conceptual blends. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1555–1577.Google Scholar

Hutchins, E. (2006). The distributed cognition perspective on human interaction. In Enfield, N. J. & Levinson, S. C. (Eds.), Roots of Human Sociality (pp. 375–398). London: Berg.Google Scholar

Hutchins, E., & Johnson, C. M. (2009). Modeling the emergence of language as an embodied collective cognitive activity. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 523–546.Google Scholar

Hutchins, E., & Klausen, T. (1996). Distributed cognition in an airline cockpit. In Engeström, Y. & Middleton, D. (Eds.), Cognition and Communication at Work (pp. 15–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ingold, T. (2000). The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ingold, T. (2004). Culture on the ground – the world perceived through the feet. Journal of Material Culture, 9, 315–340.Google Scholar

Ingold, T. (2011). Being Alive. Essays on Movement, Knowledge, and Description. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ingold, T., & Vergunst, J. L. (2008). Introduction. In Ingold, T. & Vergunst, J. L. (Eds.), Ways of Walking. Ethnography and Practice on Foot (pp. 1–20). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Jackson, M. (1989). Paths Toward a Clearing: Radical Empiricism and Ethnographic Inquiry. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Jeannerod, M. (1984). The timing of natural prehension movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 16(3), 235–254.Google Scholar

Jeannerod, M. (1997). The Cognitive Neuroscience of Action. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Jeannerod, M. (2006). Motor Cognition. What Actions Tell the Self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jeannerod, M., Arbib, M. A., Rizzolatti, G., & Sakata, H. (1995). Grasping objects: The cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation. Trends in Neuroscience 18(7), 314–320.Google Scholar

Jefferson, G. (1990). List-construction as a task and resource. In Psathas, G. (Ed.), Interaction Competence (pp. 63–92). Washington, DC: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis & University Press of America.Google Scholar

Jefferson, G. (1996). On the poetics of ordinary talk. Text and Performance Quarterly, 16(1), 1–61.Google Scholar

Joas, H. (1996). The Creativity of Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Johnson, M., & Rohrer, T. (2007). We are live creatures: Embodiment, American pragmatism and the cognitive organism. In Ziemke, T., Zlatev, J., & Roslyn, M. F. (Eds.), Body, Language and Mind (Vol. 1: Embodiment, pp. 17–54). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Jonas, H. (1966). The Phenomenon of Life: Toward a Philosophical Biology. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Kallmeyer, W., & Schmitt, R. (1996). Forcieren oder: Die verschärfte Gangart. In Kallmeyer, W. (Ed.), Gesprächsrhetorik (pp. 19–118). Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

Kay, P. (1987). Linguistic competence and folk theories of language: Two English hedges. In Holland, D. & Quinn, N. (Eds.), Cultural Models in Language and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Keevalik, L. (2015). Coordinating the temporalities of talk and dance. In Deppermann, A. & Günthner, S. (Eds.), Temporalities in Interaction (pp. 309–335). Amsterdam: Benjamins B. V.Google Scholar

Keller, R. (1994). On Language Change: The Invisible Hand in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kendon, A. (1967). Some functions of gaze direction in two-person conversation. Acta Psychologica, 26, 22–63.Google Scholar

Kendon, A. (1980). Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. In Kay, M. R. (Ed.), The Relationship between Verbal and Nonverbal Behavior. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Kendon, A. (1990). Conducting Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kendon, A. (1995). Gestures as illocutionary and discourse structure markers in Southern Italian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 23(3), 247–279.Google Scholar

Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kendon, A. (2009). Manual actions, speech and the nature of language. In Gambarara, D. & Givigliano, A. (Eds.), Origine e sviluppo del linguaggio, fra teoria e storia. Società di Filosofia del Linguaggio, atti del XV congresso nazionale. Arcavata di Rende (CS), 15–17 settembre 2008 (pp. 19–33). Rome: Aracne editrice s.r.l.Google Scholar

Kendon, A. (2012). Language and kinesic complexity: Reflections on ‘Dedicated gesture and the emergence of sign language’. Gesture, 12(3), 308–326.Google Scholar

Kendon, A., & Versante, L. (2003). Pointing by hand in ‘Neapolitan’. In Kita, S. (Ed.), Pointing: Where Language, Culture, and Cognition Meet (pp. 109–138). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Kesselheim, Wolfgang (2010). Wissenskommunikation multimodal. Wie Museumsbesucher sich über den Inhalt einer Museumsvitrine verständigen. In Fachsprache: Internationale Zeitschrift für Fachsprachenforschung, didaktik und Terminologie 32(3–4), S.122–144.Google Scholar

Kinsbourne, M. (2006). Gesture as embodied cognition: A neurodevelopmental interpretation. Gesture, 6(2), 203–212.Google Scholar

Kinsbourne, M., & Jordan, J. S. (2009). Embodied anticipation: A neuro-developmental interpretation. Discourse Processes, 46(2–3), 103–226.Google Scholar

Kita, S. (2003a). Pointing: Where Language, Culture, and Cognition Meet. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Kita, S. (2003b). Pointing: A foundational building block of human communication. In Kita, S. (Ed.), Pointing: Where Language, Culture and Cognition Meet (pp. 1–8). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Klatzky, R. L., & Lederman, S. J. (1990). Intelligent exploration by the human hand. In Venkataraman, S. T. & Iberall, T. (Eds.), Dexterous Robot Hands (pp. 66–81). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Kohn, E. (2013). How Forests Think. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lane, H. (1976). The Wild Boy of Aveyron. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Laurier, E. (2001). Why people say where they are during mobile phone calls. Environment and Planning D: Society & Space, 19(4), 485–504.Google Scholar

Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

LeBaron, C., & Streeck, J. (1997). Built space and the interactional framing of experience during a murder interrogation. Human Studies, 20, 1–25.Google Scholar

LeBaron, C. D., & Streeck, J. (2000). Gestures, knowledge, and the world. In McNeill, D. (Ed.), Language and Gesture (pp. 118–138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lederman, S. J., & Klatzky, R. L. (1987). Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 342–368.Google Scholar

Lempert, M. (2011). Barack Obama, being sharp: Indexical order in the pragmatics of precision-grip gesture. Gesture, 11(3), 241–270.Google Scholar

Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1993 (1964)). Gesture and Speech. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Levinson, S. C. (2013). Action formation and ascription. In Sidnell, J. & Stivers, T. (Eds.), Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 103–130). Chichester: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Levinson, S. C., & Holler, J. (2014). The origin of human multi-modal communication. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369(20130302).Google Scholar

Lllinas, R. R. (2001). I of the Vortex. From Neurons to Self. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2008). A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology, 102(1–3), 59–70.Google Scholar

Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the Western Pacific. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mallery, G. (1978). A collection of gesture-signs and signals of the North American Indians with some comparisons. In Umiker-Sebeok, D. J. & Sebeok, T. A. (Eds.), Aboriginal Sign Languages of the Americas and Australia (pp. 77–406). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Marx, K. (1852). The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar

Marx, K. (1973). Grundrisse. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1960). The German Ideology, parts I & III. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar

Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and Cognition. The Realization of the Living. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar

Mauss, M. (1973 (1935)). The techniques of the body. Economy and Society, 2(1), 70–88.Google Scholar

Mayer, A. (2013). Wissenschaft vom Gehen. Die Erforschung der Bewegung im 19. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt/M.: S. Fischer.Google Scholar

McCullough, M. (1996). Abstracting Craft: The Practiced Digital Hand. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

McDermott, R., Gospodinoff, K., & Aron, J. (1978). Criteria for an ethnographical adequate description of concerted activities and their contexts. Semiotica, 24(3/4), 245–276.Google Scholar

McDermott, R. P., & Roth, D. (1978). Social organization of behavior: Interactional approaches. Annual Review of Anthropology, 7, 321–345.Google Scholar

McLuhan, M. (1994 (1964)). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and Mind. What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). The Philosopher and His Shadow. In Merleau-Ponty, M. (Ed.), Signs. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The Visible and the Invisible. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Meyer, C., Streeck, J., & Jordan, J. S. (Eds.). (2017a). Intercorporeality: Emerging Socialities in Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Meyer, C., Streeck, J., & Jordan, J. S. (Eds.). (2017b). Intercorporeality. Emerging Socialities in Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Meyer, C., & Von Wedelstaedt, U. (to appear). Enactive Intercorporeality in Sports: An Introduction. In Meyer, C. & von Wedelstaedt, U. (Eds.), Enactive Intercorporeality. The Coordination, Concertation and Collectivization of Moving Bodies in Sports. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mondada, L. (2009). Emergent focused interactions in public places: A systematic analysis of the multimodal achievement of a common interactional space. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1977–1997.Google Scholar

Mondada, L. (2012). Talking and driving: Multiactivity in the car. Semiotica, (191), 233–256.Google Scholar

Moore, C., & Dunham, P. J. (Eds.). (1995). Joint Attention: Its Origins and Role in Development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Müller, C. (2003). Forms and uses of the palm up open hand. In Müller, C. & Posner, R. (Eds.), The Semantics and Pragmatics of Everyday Gestures. The Berlin Conference (pp. 234–256). Berlin: Weidler.Google Scholar

Müller, C. (2014). Ring-gestures across cultures and times: Dimensions of variation. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body Language Communication. An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1511–1522). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Müller, C., & Bohle, U. (2007). Das Fundament fokussierter Interaktion. Zur Vorbereitung und Herstellung von Interaktionsräumen durch körperliche Koordination. In Schmitt, R. (Ed.), Koordination. Studien zur multimodalen Interaktion (pp. 129–166). Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar

Murphy, K. M. (2012). Transmodality and temporality in design interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 1966–1981.Google Scholar

Napier, J. (1980). Hands. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar

Nishizaka, A. (2000). Seeing what one sees: perception, emotion, and activity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7(1–2), 105–123.Google Scholar

Noë, A. (2015). What art unveils. The New York Times (Oct. 5, 2015), Opinion Pages.Google Scholar

Noland, C. (2009). Agency and Embodiment. Performing Gestures/Producing Culture. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Norman, D. (1992). Turn Signals Are the Facial Expressions of Automobiles. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar

Norman, D. A. (1993). Things That Make Us Smart. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar

Nuñez, R., & Sweetser, E. (2006). With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30, 401–450.Google Scholar

Odling-Smee, F. J., Laland, K. N., & Feldman, M. W. (2003). Niche Construction. The Neglected Process in Evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Ogden, R. (2010). Prosodic constructions in making complaints. In Barth-Weingarten, D., Reber, E. & Selting, M. (Eds.), Prosody in Interaction (pp. 81–104). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Olson, D. (1994). The World on Paper. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Peirce, C. S. (1901). On the Logic of Drawing from Ancient Documents, Especially from Testimonies: Collected Papers (Vol. 7, p. 219). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Peirce, C. S. (1995 (1940)). Philosophical Writings. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Peräkylä, A., & Sorjonen, M.-L. (Eds.). (2012). Emotion in Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Plessner, H. (1923). Die Einheit der Sinne. Bonn.Google Scholar

Plessner, H. (1975). Die Stufen des Organischen und der Mensch. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Plessner, H. (1980). Anthropologie der Sinne. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129–154.Google Scholar

Prinz, W., Foersterling, F., & Hauf, P. (2005). Of minds and mirrors. An introduction to the social making of minds. Interaction Studies, 6(3), 1–19.Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Quintilianus, M. F. (1922 (100)). The Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian (Butler, H. E., Trans. Vol. IV). London: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1965). Structure and Function in Primitive Society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Raymond, G. (2010). Prosodic variation in responses: The case of type-conforming responses to yes/no interrogatives. In Barth-Weingarten, D., Reber, E. & Selting, M. (Eds.), Prosody in Interaction (pp. 109–130). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Reddy, M. (1979). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In Ortony, A. (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (pp. 284–324). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Relieu, M. (1999). Parler en marchant: Pour une écologie dynamique des échanges de paroles. Langage & Société(89), 37–67.Google Scholar

Resnick, L. B. (1991). Shared cognition: Thinking as social practice. In Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M., & Teasley, S. D. (Eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition (pp. 1–22). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M., & Teasley, S. D. (Eds.). (1991) Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition (pp. 1–22). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192.Google Scholar

Rogoff, B., & Lave, J. (1984). Everyday Cognition: Its Development in Social Context. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rosaldo, M. (1990). The things we do with words: Ilongot speech acts and speech act theory in philosophy. In Carbaugh, D. (Ed.), Cultural Communication and Intercultural Contact (pp. 373–408). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Rossano, F. (2012). Gaze Behavior in Face-to-Face Interaction. PhD Dissertation, Max-Planck Institut for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen.Google Scholar

Ryle, G. (1949). The Concept of Mind. London.Google Scholar

Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. A. (2002). Home position. Gesture, 2(2), 133–146.Google Scholar

Sandler, W. (2012). Dedicated gestures and the emergence of sign language. Gesture, 12(3), 265–307.Google Scholar

Schatzki, T. R. (2002). The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Schatzki, T. R., Knorr Cetina, K., & Von Savigny, E. (Eds.). (2001). The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Scheflen, A. (1972). Body Language and Social Order. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Scheflen, A. E. (1974). How Behavior Means. Garden City: Anchor Press.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70(6), 1075–1095.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A. (1981). Discourse as in interactional achievement: some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. Paper presented at the Georgetown University Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics 1981; Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A. (1984). On some questions and ambiguities in conversation. In Atkinson, M. & Heritage, J. (Eds.), Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence Organization in Interaction. A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schmidt, R. (2012). Soziologie der Praktiken. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Schmitt, J.-C. (1990). La raison des gestes dans l’Occident médiéval. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Schmitt, R. (2012). Gehen als situierte Praktik: ‘Gemeinsam gehen’ und ‘hinter jemandem herlaufen’. Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, 13, 1–44.Google Scholar

Schmitt, R. (Ed.). (2007). Koordination. Studien zur multimodalen Interaktion. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar

Schutz, A. (1982). Collected Papers (Vol. 1–3). The Hague: Martinus Nijhof.Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sellen, A. J., & Harper, R. (2002). The Myth of the Paperless Office. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Selting, M. (1988). The role of intonation in the organization of repair and problem handling sequences in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 293–322.Google Scholar

Selting, M. (1992). Prosody in conversational questions. Journal of Pragmatics, 17, 315–345.Google Scholar

Selting, M. (1996). Prosody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation: The case of s-called ‘astonished’ questions in repair initiation. In Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Selting, M. (Eds.), Prosody in Conversation. Interactional Studies (pp. 231–270). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sennett, R. (2008). The Craftsman. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Sharrock, W., & Coulter, J. (1998). On what we can see. Theory and Psychology, 8(2), 147–164.Google Scholar

Sennett, R. (1977). The Fall of Public Man. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar

Simmel, G. (2009). Sociology. Inquiries into the Construction of Social Forms (Blasi, A. J., Jacobs, A. K., & Kanjirathinkal, M.; Trans. Blasi, A. J., Jacobs, A. K., & Kanjirathinkal, M. Eds.). Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar

Sinclair, N., & de Freitas, E. (to appear). The haptic nature of gesture: Rethinking gesture with new multitouch digital technologies. Gesture.Google Scholar

Sowa, T. (2006). Understanding Coverbal Iconic Gestures in Shape Descriptions. Berlin: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Stewart, J., Gapenne, O., & Di Paolo, E. (Eds.). (2010). Enaction: Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Streeck, J. (1983). Social Order in Child Communication. A Study in Microethnography. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Streeck, J. (1993). Gesture as communication I: Its coordination with gaze and speech. Communication Monographs, 60(December 1993), 275–299.Google Scholar

Streeck, J. (1996). How to do things with things: Objets trouvés and symbolization. Human Studies, 19, 365–384.Google Scholar

Streeck, J. (2002). A body and its gestures. Gesture, 2(1), 19–44.Google Scholar

Streeck, J. (2007a). Geste und verstreichende Zeit: Stillstand und Bedeutungswandel. In Hausendorf, H. (Ed.), Gespräch als Prozess (pp. 155–177). Tubingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar

Streeck, J. (2007b). Homo faber’s gestures. Review article on A. Kendon, Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 130–140.Google Scholar

Streeck, J. (2008a). Depicting by gestures. Gesture, 8(3), 285–301.Google Scholar

Streeck, J. (2008b). Laborious intersubjectivity: Attentional struggle and embodied communication in an auto-shop. In Wachsmuth, I., Lenzen, M., & Knoblich, G. (Eds.), Embodied Communication in Humans and Machines. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Streeck, J. (2008c). Gesture in political communication: A case study of the Democratic presidential candidates during the 2004 primary campaign. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 41(2), 154–186.Google Scholar

Streeck, J. (2009a). Gesturecraft. The Manufacture of Meaning. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Streeck, J. (2009b). Forward-gesturing. Discourse Processes, 45(3/4), 161–179.Google Scholar

Streeck, J. (2013a). Praxeology of gesture. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S., McNeill, D., & Tessendorf, S. (Eds.), Handbook Body Language Communication. An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 674–685). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Streeck, J. (2013b). Interaction and the living body. Journal of Pragmatics, 46, 69–90.Google Scholar

Streeck, J. (2014). Mutual gaze and recognition. Revisiting gaze direction in two-person interaction. In Gullberg, M. & Seyfeddinipur, M. (Eds.), From Gesture in Conversation to Visible Action as Utterance. Festschrift for Adam Kendon (pp. 35–55). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Streeck, J. (2015). Embodiment in human communication. Annual Review of Anthropology, 44, 419–438.Google Scholar

Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C. (2011a). Embodied interaction in the material world: An introduction. In Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C. (Eds.), Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C. (Eds.). (2011b). Embodied Interaction. Language and Body in the Material World. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Streeck, J., & Hartge, U. (1992). Previews: Gestures at the transition place. In Auer, P. & di Luzio, A. (Eds.), The Contextualization of Language (pp. 138–158). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Streeck, J., & Henderson, D. (2010). Das Handwerk des Hip-Hop. Freestyle als körperliche Praxis. In Wulf, C. & Fischer-Lichte, E. (Eds.), Gesten: Inszenierung, Aufführung und Praxis (pp. 180–206). München: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar

Streeck, J., & Jordan, J. S. (2009a). Communication as a dynamical self-sustaining system: The importance of time-scales and nested contexts. Communication Theory, 19, 448–467.Google Scholar

Streeck, J., & Mehus, S. (2004). Microethnography: The study of practices. In Fitch, K. L. & Sanders, R. E. (Eds.), Handbook of Language and Social Interaction (pp. 381–405). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Stukenbrock, A. (2009). Referenz durch Zeigen: Zur Theorie der Deixis. Deutsche Sprache, 37, 289–315.Google Scholar

Stukenbrock, A. (2015). Deixis in der Face-to-Face Interaktion. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Taylor, J. R. (2011). Organization as an (imbricated) configuring of transactions. Organization Studies, 32(9), 1273–1294.Google Scholar

Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in Life. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167–196.Google Scholar

Tomasello, M. (1995). Joint attention as social cognition. In Moore, C. & Dunham, P. J. (Eds.), Joint Attention. Its Origins and Role in Development (pp. 103–130). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Tomasello, M. (2006). Why don’t apes point? In Enfield, N. J. & Levinson, S. C. (Eds.), Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction (pp. 506–524). Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar

Uexküll, J. v. (1957). A stroll through the worlds of animals an men: A picture book of invisible worlds. In Schiller, C. H. (Ed.), Instinctive Behavior: The Development of a Modern Concept. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar

Wachsmuth, I., & Knoblich, G. (2004). Embodied Communication in Humans and Machines. Unpublished grant proposal. Bielefeld: Center for Interdisciplinary Research (ZiF).Google Scholar

Weick, K., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2011). Managing the Unexpected: Resilient Performance in an Age of Uncertainty (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Weick, K. E. (1976). Organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1–16.Google Scholar

Wilkins, D. (2003). Why pointing with the index finger is not a universal (in sociocultural and semiotic terms). In Kita, S. (Ed.), Pointing: Where Language, Culture, and Cognition Meet (pp. 171–216). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 625–636.Google Scholar

Wilson, M. (2006). Covert imitation: How the body schema acts as a prediction device. In Knoblich, G., Thomspon, I. M., Gorsjean, M., & Shiffrar, M. (Eds.), Human Body Perception from the Inside Out (pp. 211–228). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wilson, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin, 131(3), 460–473.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical Investigations. Chichester: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Wolpert, D. M., & Miall, C. (1996). Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Networks, 9(8), 1265–1279.Google Scholar

Zlatev, J. (2003). Meaning = life (+ culture). An outline of a unified biocultural theory of meaning. Evolution of Communication, 4(2), 253–296.Google Scholar