Book contents
- Self-Ownership, Property Rights, and the Human Body
- Cambridge Bioethics and Law
- Self-Ownership, Property Rights, and the Human Body
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases
- Table of Legislation
- 1 Bodies of Value
- Part I Human Tissues and the Law
- Part II Property and Persons
- Part III Beyond Self-ownership
- Bibliography
- Index
- Books in the Series
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 April 2018
Book contents
- Self-Ownership, Property Rights, and the Human Body
- Cambridge Bioethics and Law
- Self-Ownership, Property Rights, and the Human Body
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases
- Table of Legislation
- 1 Bodies of Value
- Part I Human Tissues and the Law
- Part II Property and Persons
- Part III Beyond Self-ownership
- Bibliography
- Index
- Books in the Series
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Self-Ownership, Property Rights, and the Human BodyA Legal and Philosophical Analysis, pp. 309 - 328Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Ackerman, B.A., Private Property and the Constitution (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1977)Google Scholar
Altman, S., ‘(Com)modifying experience’ (1991) 65 Southern California Law Review 293Google ScholarPubMed
Anonymous, ‘Alistair Cooke’s bones “stolen”’ BBC News (22 December 2005), http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/4552742.stmGoogle Scholar
Anonymous, ‘The rape of the lock: Is it larceny?’ (1961) 25 Journal of Criminal Law 163Google Scholar
Archard, D., ‘Informed consent: Autonomy and self-ownership’ (2008) 25 Journal of Applied Philosophy 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneson, R., ‘Lockean self-ownership: Towards a demolition’ (1991) 39 Political Studies 36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, J., ‘Rescuing the bundle of rights metaphor in property law’ (2014) 82 University of Cincinnati Law Review 57Google Scholar
Becker, L.C., ‘The moral basis of property’ in Pennock, J.R. and Chapman, J.W. (eds), Property: Nomos XXII (New York: New York University Press, 1980), pp. 187–220Google Scholar
Becker, L.C., Property Rights: Philosophic Foundations (London: Routledge and Keegan Paul, 1980)Google Scholar
Bennett Moses, L., ‘The problem with alternatives: The importance of property law in regulating excised human tissue and in vitro human embryos’ in Goold, I., Herring, J., Skene, L., and Greasley, K. (eds), Persons, Parts and Property: How Should We Regulate Human Tissue in the 21st Century? (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014), pp. 197–214Google Scholar
Bentham, J., ‘Anarchical fallacies’ in Waldron, J. (ed.), Nonsense Upon Stilts: Bentham, Burke, and Marx on the Rights of Man (London: Methuen, 1987), pp. 46–76Google Scholar
Berlin, I., ‘Two concepts of liberty’ in Hardy, H.E. (ed.), Liberty, Incorporating ‘Four Essays on Liberty’ (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), pp. 166–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyleveld, D. and Brownsword, R., ‘My body, my body parts, my property’ (2000) 8 Health Care Analysis 87CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blackstone, W., Commentaries on the Laws of England, 1st edn (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1765–1769)Google Scholar
Blumberg, B.S. et al., ‘Ted Slavin’s blood and the development of the HBV vaccine’ (1985) 312 New England Journal of Medicine 189Google ScholarPubMed
Brassington, I., ‘John Harris’ argument for a duty to research’ (2007) 21 Bioethics 160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brazier, M., ‘Human(s) as medicine(s)’ in McLean, S. (ed.), First Do No Harm (Aldershort: Ashgate Publishing Ltd, 2006), pp. 187–202Google Scholar
Brazier, M., ‘Patient autonomy and consent to treatment: The role of the law?’ (1987) 7 Legal Studies 169CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brazier, M., ‘Retained organs: Ethics and humanity’ (2002) 22 Legal Studies 550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brazier, M. (ed.), Clerk and Lindsell on Torts, 17th edn (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1995)Google Scholar
Brazier, M. and Cave, E., Medicine, Patients and the Law, 6th edn (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Brazier, M. and Miola, J., ‘Bye-bye Bolam: A medical litigation revolution?’ (2000) 8 Medical Law Review 85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brazier, M. and Ost, S., Bioethics, Medicine and the Criminal Law: Medicine and Bioethics in the Theatre of the Criminal Process (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breakey, H., ‘Who’s afraid of property rights? Rights as core concepts, coherent, prima facie, situated and specified’ (2014) 33 Law and Philosophy 573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenkert, G.G., ‘Self-ownership, freedom, and autonomy’ (1998) 2 Journal of Ethics 27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bristol Royal Infirmary Inquiry, Inquiry into the Management of Care of Children Receiving Complex Heart Surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary: Interim Report (London: The Stationery Office, 2000).Google Scholar
Brownsword, R., ‘The cult of consent: Fixation and fallacy’ (2004) 15 King’s College Law Journal 223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownsword, R., ‘Property in human tissue: Triangulating the issue’ in Steinman, M., Sykora, P., and Wiesing, U. (eds), Altruism Reconsidered: Exploring New Approaches to Property in Human Tissue (Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Ltd, 2009), pp. 93–104Google Scholar
Brudner, A., ‘The unity of property law’ (1991) 4 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calabresi, G., ‘Remarks: The simple virtues of The Cathedral’’ (1997) 106 Yale Law Journal 2201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calabresi, G. and Melamed, D., ‘Property rules, liability rules, and inalienability: One view of the Cathedral’ (1972) 85 Harvard Law Review 1089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A.V., McLean, S.A.M., Gutridge, K., and Harper, H., ‘Human tissue legislation: Listening to the professionals’ (2008) 34 Journal of Medical Ethics 104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, C.S., ‘Body, self, and the property paradigm’ (1992) 22 Hastings Center Report 34CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carey Miller, D.L., Corporeal Moveables in Scots Law (Edinburgh: W Green and Son Ltd, 2005)Google Scholar
Chalmers, D. and Nicol, D., ‘Commercialisation of biotechnology: Public trust and research’ (2004) 6 International Journal of Biotechnology 116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, D., Burgess, M., Edwards, K., Kaye, J., Meslin, E.M., and Nicol, D., ‘Marking shifts in human research ethics in the development of biobanking’ (2015) 8 Public Health Ethics 63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, R. (ed.), Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Chattin, T.M.K., ‘Property rights in dead bodies’ (1969) 71 West Virginia Law Review 377Google Scholar
Cheney, A., Body Brokers: Inside America’s Underground Trade in Human Remains (New York: Broadway Books, 2006)Google Scholar
Christman, J., The Myth of Property: Toward an Egalitarian Theory of Ownership (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christman, J., ‘Self-ownership, equality, and the structure of property rights’ (1991) 19 Political Theory 28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christman, J. and Anderson, J. (eds), Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claeys, E., ‘Bundle-of-sticks notions in legal and economic scholarship’ (2011) 8 Econ Journal Watch 205Google Scholar
Coggon, J., ‘Varied and principled understandings of autonomy in English law: Justifiable inconsistency or blinkered moralism?’ (2007) 15 Health Care Analysis 235CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coggon, J. and Miola, J., ‘Autonomy, liberty, and medical decision-making’ (2011) 70 Cambridge Law Journal 523CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, G.A., ‘Once more into the breach of self-ownership: Reply to Narveson and Brenkert’ (1998) 2 Journal of Ethics 57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G.A., Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Equality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, I.G., ‘The price of everything, the value of nothing: Reframing the commodification debate’ (2003) 117 Harvard Law Review 689Google Scholar
Coke, E., The Third Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England: Concerning High Treason, and Other Pleas of the Crown, and Criminal Causes, 4th edn (London: A. Crooke, 1669)Google Scholar
Conboy, K., Medina, N., and Stanbury, S. (eds), Writing on the Body: Female Embodiment and Feminist Theory (New York: Columbia University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Cooper, M. and Waldy, C., Clinical Labor: Tissue Donors and Research Subjects in the Global Bioeconomy (Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2014)Google Scholar
Curchin, K., ‘Evading the paradox of universal self-ownership’ (2007) 15 Journal of Political Philosophy 484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dabrock, P., Taupitz, J., and Ried, J. (eds), Trust in Biobanking (Dordrecht: Springer, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, M., ‘Queer property, queer persons: Self-ownership and beyond’ (1999) 8 Social and Legal Studies 327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, M. and Naffine, N., Are Persons Property? Legal Debates about Property and Personality (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001)Google Scholar
Davis, L., ‘Comments on Nozick’s entitlement theory’ (1976) 73 Journal of Philosophy 836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Melo-Martin, I., ‘A duty to participate in research: Does social context matter?’ (2008) 8 American Journal of Bioethics 28CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Department of Health, Human Bodies, Human Choices: The Law on Human Organs and Tissues in England and Wales (London: The Stationary Office, 2002)Google Scholar
Department of Health, Learning from Bristol: The Report of the Public Inquiry into Children’s Heart Surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984–1995 (London: The Stationary Office, 2001)Google Scholar
Department of Health, Reference Guide to Consent for Examination or Treatment, 2nd edn (Crown Copyright, 2009)Google Scholar
Devaney, S., Stem Cell Research and the Collaborative Regulation of Innovation (Abingdon: Routledge, 2014)Google Scholar
Devaney, S., ‘Tissue providers for stem cell research: The dispossessed’ (2010) 2 Law, Innovation, and Technology 165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
di Robilant, A., ‘Property: A bundle of sticks or a tree? (2013) 66 Vanderbilt Law Review 869Google Scholar
Dickenson, D., Body Shopping: The Economy Fuelled by Flesh and Blood (Oxford: One World Publications, 2008)Google Scholar
Dickenson, D., ‘The lady vanishes: What’s missing from the stem cell debate’ (2006) 3 Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickenson, D., Property in the Body: Feminist Perspectives, 2nd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, S., Liability for Wrongful Interferences with Chattels (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011)Google Scholar
Douglas, S., ‘Property rights in human biological material’ in Goold, I., Herring, J., Skene, L., and Greasley, K. (eds), Persons, Parts and Property: How Should We Regulate Human Tissue in the 21st Century? (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014), pp. 89–108Google Scholar
Douglas, S., ‘Kuwait Airways Corporation v Iraqi Airways Company [2002]’ in Douglas, S., Hickey, R., and Waring, E. (eds), Landmark Cases in Property Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2015), pp. 205–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, S. and Goold, I., ‘Property in human biomaterials: A new methodology’ (2016) 75 Cambridge Law Journal 478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, S. and McFarlane, B., ‘Defining property rights’ in Penner, J. and Smith, H. (eds), Philosophical Foundations of Property Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 219–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, G., The Theory and Practice of Autonomy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988, reprinted 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, G. and Kennedy, I. ‘Human tissue: Rights in the body and its parts’ (1993) 1 Medical Law Review 291CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dworkin, R., ‘Rights as trumps’ in Waldron, J. (ed.), Theories of Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984), pp. 153–167Google Scholar
Dworkin, R., ‘What is equality? Part 1: Equality of welfare’ (1981) 10 Philosophy and Public Affairs 185Google Scholar
Dworkin, R., ‘What is equality? Part 2: Equality of resources’ (1981) 10 Philosophy and Public Affairs 283Google Scholar
Eiseman, E. and Haga, S.B., Handbook of Human Tissue Sources: A National Resource of Human Tissue Samples (RAND Corporation, 1999)Google Scholar
Eleftheriadis, P., ‘The analysis of property rights’ (1996) 16 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellickson, R., ‘Two cheers for the bundle-of-sticks metaphor, three cheers for Merrill and Smith’ (2011) 8 Econ Journal Watch 215Google Scholar
Ellis, C. and Flaherty, M., Investigating Subjectivity: Research on Lived Experience (London: Sage Publications, 1992)Google Scholar
Erin, C., ‘Who owns Mo? Using historical entitlement theory to decide the ownership of human derived cell lines’ in Dyson, A. and Harris, J. (eds), Ethics and Biotechnology (Routledge: London, 1994), pp. 157–178Google Scholar
Erin, C. and Harris, J., ‘A monopsonistic market: Or how to buy and sell human organs, tissues, and cells ethically’ in Robinson, I. (ed.), Life and Death under High Technology Medicine (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1994), pp. 134–153Google Scholar
Erskine, J., An Institute of the Law of Scotland (Edinburgh: Legal Education Trust, 1st edn 1773, reprint)Google Scholar
Fabre, C., Whose Body Is It Anyway? Justice and the Integrity of the Person (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faden, R. and Beauchamp, T., A History and Theory of Informed Consent (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986)Google Scholar
Farran, S., ‘Storing sperm in Scotland: A risky business’ (2011) 2 European Review of Private Law 258Google Scholar
Farrell, A.M., The Politics of Blood: Ethics, Innovation, and the Regulation of Risk (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, A.M. and Brazier, M., ‘Not so new directions in the law of consent? Examining Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board’ (2016) 42 Journal of Medical Ethics 85CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feinberg, J., The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law: Harm to Others (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984)Google Scholar
Feinberg, J., The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law: Harm to Self (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986)Google Scholar
Flathman, R., ‘On the alleged impossibility of an unqualified disjustificatory theory of property rights’ in Pennock, J.R. and Chapman, J.W. (eds), Property: Nomos XXII (New York: New York University Press, 1980), pp. 221–243.Google Scholar
Fletcher, R., Fox, M., and McCandless, J., ‘Legal embodiment: Analysing the body in healthcare law’ (2008) 16 Medical Law Review 321CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ford, M., A property model of pregnancy’ (2005) 1 International Journal of Law in Context 261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forst, R., ‘Political liberty: Integrating five conceptions of autonomy’ in Christman, J. and Anderson, J. (eds), Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), pp. 226–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, D., ‘Relativity of title at law and in equity’ (2006) 65 Cambridge Law Journal 330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fried, B.H., ‘Left-libertarianism: A review essay’ (2004) 32 Philosophy and Public Affairs 66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaus, G.F., ‘The place of autonomy within liberalism’ in Christman, J. and Anderson, J. (eds), Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), pp. 272–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gieryn, T.F., ‘Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists’ (1983) 48 American Sociological Review 781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gieryn, T.F., Cultural Boundaries of Science (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Glister, J. and Glister, T., ‘Property in recyclable artificial implants’ (2013) 21 Journal of Law and Medicine 357Google ScholarPubMed
Gold, R.E., Body Parts: Property Rights and the Ownership of Human Biological Materials (Washington: Georgetown University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Goldberg, J.D., ‘Involuntary servitudes: A property-based notion of abortion’ (1991) 38 University of California Los Angeles Law Review 1597Google ScholarPubMed
Goold, I., ‘Abandonment and human tissue’ in Goold, I., Greasley, K., Herring, J., and Skene, L. (eds), Persons, Parts and Property: How Should We Regulate Human Tissue in the 21st Century? (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014), pp. 125–155Google Scholar
Goold, I., ‘Sounds suspiciously like property treatment: Does human tissue fit within the common law concept of property?’ (2005) 7 University of Technology Sydney Law Review 62Google Scholar
Goold, I., ‘Why does it matter how we regulate the use of human body parts?’ (2014) 40 Journal of Medical Ethics 3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goold, I. and Quigley, M., ‘Human biomaterials: The case for a property approach’ in Goold, I., Greasley, K., Herring, J., and Skene, L. (eds), Persons, Parts and Property: How Should We Regulate Human Tissue in the 21st Century? (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014), pp. 231–262Google Scholar
Gorr, M., ‘Justice, self-ownership, and natural assets’ (1995) 12 Social Philosophy and Policy 267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottlieb, K., ‘Human biological samples and the laws of property: The trust as a model for biological repositories’ in Weir, R.F. (ed.), Stored Tissue Samples: Ethical, Legal, and Public Policy Implications (Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, 1998), pp. 182–197Google Scholar
Gray, K. and Gray, S., Elements of Land Law, 5th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Greasley, K., ‘Property rights in the human body: Commodification and objectification’ in Goold, I., Greasley, K., Herring, J., and Skene, L. (eds), Persons, Parts and Property: How Should We Regulate Human Tissue in the 21st Century? (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014), pp. 68–87Google Scholar
Green, S., ‘An introduction to wrongful interference actions’ in Nolan, D. and Robertson, A. (eds), Rights and Private Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011), pp. 525–551Google Scholar
Grey, T.C., ‘The disintegration of property’ in Pennock, J.R. and Chapman, J.W. (eds), Property: Nomos XXII (New York: New York University Press, 1980), pp. 69–85Google Scholar
Griffin, J., Well-Being: Its Meaning, Measurement and Importance (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986)Google Scholar
Grotius, H., The Rights of War and Peace, ed. and trans. Campbell, A.C. (London: Hyperion Reprint Edition, 1979)Google Scholar
Grubb, A., ‘“I, me, mine”: Bodies, parts and property’ (1998) 3 Medical Law International 299CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haddow, G., Embodiment and the Everyday Cyborg: Technologies and Altered Subjectivities (Manchester: Manchester University Press, forthcoming)Google Scholar
Haddow, G., Harmon, S.H.E., and Gilman, L., ‘Implantable Smart Technologies (IST): Defining the ‘Sting’ in Data and Device’ (2016) 24 Health Care Analysis 210CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haddow, G., King, E., Kunkler, I., and McLaren, D., ‘Cyborgs in the everyday: Masculinity and biosensing prostate cancer’ (2015) 24 Science as Culture 484CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haddow, G., Laurie, G.T., Cunningham-Burley, S., and Hunter, K., ‘Benefit-sharing: Public solutions to private interests?’ (2007) 64 Social Science and Medicine 272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, D., ‘A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century’ in Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (New York: Routledge, 1991), pp. 149–181Google Scholar
Hardcastle, R., Law and the Human Body: Property Rights, Ownership, and Control (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2009)Google Scholar
Harmon, S.H.E., ‘Yearworth v. North Bristol NHS Trust: A property case of uncertain significance?’ (2010) 13 Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy 343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmon, S.H.E. and Laurie, G.T., ‘Yearworth v. North Bristol NHS Trust: Property, principles, precedents, and paradigms’ (2010) 69 Cambridge Law Journal 476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, D.R., ‘The concept of possession in English law’ in Guest, A.G. (ed.), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961), pp. 69–106Google Scholar
Harris, J., ‘Scientific research is a moral duty’ (2007) 31 Journal of Medical Ethics 242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, J.W., ‘Who owns my body?’ (1996) 16 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 55CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, H.L.A., ‘Are there any natural rights?’ (1955) 64 Philosophical Review LXIV 175, reprinted in J. Waldron (ed.), Theories of Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984), pp. 77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H.L.A., ‘Between utility and rights’ (1979) 79 Columbia Law Review 828, reprinted in A. Ryan (ed.) The Idea of Freedom: Essays in Honour of Isaiah Berlin (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979), pp. 77–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H.L.A., ‘Definition and theory in jurisprudence’ (1954) 70 Law Quarterly Review 37Google Scholar
Hart, H.L.A., Essays on Bentham: Studies in Jurisprudence and Political Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawes, C., ‘Property interests in body parts: Yearworth v North Bristol NHS Trust’ (2010) 73 Modern Law Review 119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, A.K. and O’ Doherty, K., ‘Biobank governance: A lesson in trust’ (2010) 29 New Genetics and Society 311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haworth, L., Autonomy: An Essay in Philosophical Psychology and Ethics (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F., Outlines of the Philosophy of Right, trans. Knox, T.M. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar
Herring, J., ‘Why we need a statute regime to regulate bodily material’ in Goold, I., Herring, J., Skene, L., and Greasley, K. (eds), Persons, Parts and Property: How Should We Regulate Human Tissue in the 21st Century? (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014), pp. 213–229.Google Scholar
Herring, J. and Chau, P-L., ‘My body, your body, our bodies’ (2007) 15 Medical Law Review 34CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hickey, R., ‘Dazed and confused: Accidental mixtures of goods and the theory of acquisition of title’ (2003) 66 Modern Law Review 368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickey, R., ‘Stealing abandoned goods: Possessory title in proceedings for theft’ (2006) 26 Legal Studies 584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmaster, B., ‘Between the sacred and the profane: Bodies, property, and patents in the Moore case’ (1992) 7 Intellectual Property Journal 115Google Scholar
Hohfeld, W.N., Fundamental Legal Conceptions of a Right as Applied in Judicial Reasoning (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1919, reprinted 1966)Google Scholar
Holm, S., Hofmann, B., and Solbakk, J.H., ‘Conscription to biobank research?’ in Solbakk, J.H., Holm, S., and Hofmann, B. (eds), The Ethics of Research Biobanking (Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media, 2009), pp. 255–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honoré, A.M., ‘Ownership’ in Guest, A.G. (ed.), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (Oxford University Press 1961), pp. 107–147Google Scholar
Honoré, A.M., ‘Rights of exclusion and immunities against divesting’ (1960) 34 Tulane Law Review 453Google Scholar
Hoppe, N., Bioequity: Property and the Human Body (Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Ltd, 2009)Google Scholar
Hoeyer, K., ‘The ethics of research biobanking: A critical review of the literature’ (2008) 25 Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews 429CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoeyer, K., Exchanging Human Bodily Material: Rethinking Bodies and Markets (Dordrecht: Springer, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Independent Review Group, Retention of Organs at Post-Mortem Final Report (Edinburgh: The Stationery Office, 2001)Google Scholar
International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, Skin and Bone: The Shadowy Trade in Human Body Parts (Centre for Public Integrity, 2012)Google Scholar
Jennings, B., ‘Autonomy’ in Steinbock, B. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 72–89Google Scholar
Jones, M.A. (ed.), Clerk and Lindsell on Torts, 21st edn (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2014)Google Scholar
Kant, I., Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Ellington, J. (Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company Inc., 1993)Google Scholar
Kant, I., Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Gregor, M. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Kant, I., Lectures on Ethics: The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant in Translation, trans. Heath, P. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I., The Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Gregor, M. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, L., ‘Exclusion and exclusivity in property law’ (2008) 58 University of Toronto Law Journal 275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, L., ‘The regulative function of property rights’ (2011) 8 Econ Journal Watch 236Google Scholar
Kaveny, M.C., ‘Commodifying the polyvalent good of health care’ (1999) 24 Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 207CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kent, J., Regenerating Bodies: Tissue and Cell Therapies in the Twenty-First Century (London and New York: Routledge, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khamsi, R., ‘Bio-engineered bladders successful in patients’ New Scientist (4 April 2006)Google Scholar
Kleinig, J., ‘The nature of consent’ in Miller, F.G. and Wertheimer, A. (eds), The Ethics of Consent: Theory and Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 3–22Google Scholar
Korobkin, R., ‘“No compensation” or “pro compensation”: Moore v. Regents and default rules for human tissue donations’ (2007) 40 Journal of Health Law 1Google ScholarPubMed
Kramer, M., ‘Rights without trimmings’ in Kramer, M., Simmonds, N.E. and Steiner, H. (eds), A Debate over Rights: Philosophical Enquiries (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998, reprinted 2002), pp. 60–101Google Scholar
Kramer, M., Simmonds, N.E., and Steiner, H. (eds), A Debate over Rights: Philosophical Enquiries (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998, reprinted 2002)Google Scholar
Krauss, M.I., ‘Property rules vs. liability rules’ in Bouckaert, B. and De Geest, G. (eds), Encylopedia of Law and Economics, vol. II (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2000), pp. 782–794Google Scholar
Krier, J.E. and Schwab, S.J., ‘Property rules and liability rules: The Cathedral in another light’ (1995) 70 New York University Law Review 440Google Scholar
Kuflik, A., ‘The inalienability of autonomy’ (1984) 13 Philosophy and Public Affairs 271Google Scholar
Kymlicka, W., Contemporary Political Philosophy, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Ladyman, S., Human Tissue Bill, House of Commons Standing Committee G (27 January 2004), cols 59 and 65Google Scholar
Lamont, M. and Molnar, V., ‘The study of boundaries in the social sciences’ (2002) 28 Annual Review of Sociology 167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurie, G.T., Genetic Privacy: A Challenge to Medico-Legal Norms (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurie, G.T., ‘Privacy and property? Multi-level strategies for protecting personal interests in genetic material’ in Knoppers, B.M. and Scriver, C. (eds), Genomics, Health and Society: Emerging Issues for Public Policy (Ottowa: Policy Research Initiative, 2004), pp. 83–98Google Scholar
Laurie, G.T., ‘Reflexive governance in biobanking: On the value of policy led approaches and the need to recognise the limits of law’ (2011) 130 Human Genetics 347CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laurie, G.T., Harmon, S.H.E., and Porter, G., Mason and McCall Smith’s Law and Medical Ethics, 10th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, F.H. and Rudden, B., The Law of Property (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach Scully, J., Disability Bioethics: Moral Bodies, Moral Difference (Plymouth: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2008)Google Scholar
Lee, J., ‘The fertile imagination of the common law: Yearworth v North Bristol’ (2009) 17 Torts Law Journal 130Google Scholar
Lennon, K., ‘Feminist perspectives on the body’ in Zalta, E.N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2014 edn)Google Scholar
Liddell, K., ‘Beyond a rebarbative commitment to consent’ in Corrigan, O. et al. (eds), The Limits of Consent: A Socio-Ethical Approach to Human Subject Research in Medicine (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 79–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liddell, K. and Hall, A., ‘Beyond Bristol and Alder Hey: The future regulation of human tissue’ (2005) 13 Medical Law Review 170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, J., Two Treatises of Government, ed. Laslett, Peter (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBride, N.J., ‘Rights and the basis of tort law’ in Nolan, D. and Robertson, A. (eds), Rights and Private Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2012), pp. 331–365Google Scholar
McFarlane, B., ‘Keppell v Bailey (1834); Hill v Tupper (1863): The numerus clausus and the common law’ in Gravells, N. (ed.) Landmark Cases in Land Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013), pp. 1–32Google Scholar
McHale, J., ‘“Appropriate consent” and the use of human material for research purposes: The competent adult’ (2006) 1 Clinical Ethics 195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McHale, J., ‘The Human Tissue Act: Innovative legislation – fundamentally flawed or missed opportunity?’ (2005) 26 Liverpool Law Review 169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, C. and Stoljar, N. (eds), Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, J.L., ‘Can there be a right-based moral theory?’ in Waldron, J. (ed.), Theories of Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984), pp. 129–142Google Scholar
MacLean, A., Autonomy, Informed Consent and Medical Law: A Relational Challenge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013)Google Scholar
McLean, S.A.M., Campbell, A.V., Gutridge, K., and Harper, H., ‘Human tissue legislation and medical practice: A benefit or a burden?’ (2006) 8 Medical Law International 1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macpherson, C.B. (ed.), Property: Mainstream and Critical Positions (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1978)Google Scholar
Maddox, N., ‘Abandonment’ and the acquisition of property rights in separated human biomaterials’ (2016) 16 Medical Law International 229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnusson, R., ‘Proprietary rights in human tissue’ in Palmer, N. and McKendrick, E. (eds), Interests in Goods (London: Lloyd’s of London Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Manson, N., ‘Consent and informed consent’ in Ashcroft, R.E. et al. (eds), Principles of Health Care Ethics (Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 2007), pp. 297–303Google Scholar
Manson, N. and O’ Neill, O., Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maqsood, M.I., Matin, M.M., Bahrami, A.R., and Ghasroldasht, M.M., ‘Immortality of cell lines: Challenges and advantages of establishment’ (2013) Cell Biology International 1065Google Scholar
Markby, W., Elements of Law Considered with Reference to Principles of General Jurisprudence, 3rd edn (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1885)Google Scholar
Marway, H., Johnson, S.L., and Widdows, H., ‘Commodification of human tissue’ in ten Have, H.A.M.J. and Gordijn, B. (eds), Handbook of Global Bioethics (Dordrecht: Springer Science and Business Media, 2014), pp. 581–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, C., Brindley, D.A., Culme-Seymour, E.J., and Davie, N.L., ‘Cell therapy industry: Billion dollar global business with unlimited potential’ (2011) 6 Regenerative Medicine 265CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mason, C. et al., ‘Cell therapy companies make strong progress from October 2012 to March 2013 amid mixed stock market sentiment’ (2013) 12 Cell Stem Cell 644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, J.K. and Laurie, G.T., ‘Consent or property? Dealing with the body and its parts in the shadow of Bristol and Alder Hey’ (2001) 64 Modern Law Review 710CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mason, J.K. and Laurie, G.T., Mason and McCall Smith’s Law and Medical Ethics, 9th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, E.H., ‘Merleau-Ponty’s body-subject and psychiatry’ (2004) 16 International Review of Psychiatry 190CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matthews, P., ‘Whose body? People as property’ (1983) 36 Current Legal Problems 193CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Medical Research Council, Human Tissue and Biological Samples for Use in Research: Operational and Ethical Guidelines (April 2001, amended 2005)Google Scholar
Medical Research Council, Human Tissue and Biological Samples for Use in Research: Operational and Ethical Guidelines (November 2014)Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M., Phenomenology of Perception (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1962)Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M., Signs, trans. McCleary, R. (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1964)Google Scholar
Merrill, T.W. and Smith, H.E., ‘Optimal standardization in the law of property: The numerus clausus principle’ (2000) 110 Yale Law Journal 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrill, T.W. and Smith, H.E., Property: Principles and Policies, 3rd edn (Foundation Press, 2012)Google Scholar
Metzger, E., ‘Acquisition of living things by specification’ (2004) 8 Edinburgh Law Review 115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, J.S., On Liberty and Other Essays, ed. Gray, J. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Miller, F.G. and Wertheimer, A., ‘Preface to a theory of consent transactions: Beyond valid consent’ in Miller, F.G. and Wertheimer, A. (eds), The Ethics of Consent: Theory and Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 79–106Google Scholar
Miller, F.G. and Wertheimer, A. (eds), The Ethics of Consent: Theory and Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Montgomery, J. and Montgomery, E., ‘Montgomery on informed consent: An inexpert decision? (2016) 42 Journal of Medical Ethics 89CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morales, F.J., ‘The property matrix: An analytical tool to answer the question, is this property’ (2013) 161 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1125Google Scholar
Munzer, S.R., ‘A bundle theorist holds on to his collection of sticks’ (2011) 8 Econ Journal Watch 265.Google Scholar
Munzer, S.R., A Theory of Property (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munzer, S.R., ‘Kant and property rights in body parts’ (1993) VI Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, T., ‘Who owns the body? On the ethics of using human tissue for commercial purposes’ (1986) 8 IRB: Ethics and Human Research 1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naffine, N., ‘The legal structure of self-ownership: Or the self-possessed man and the woman possessed’ (1998) 25 Journal of Law and Society 193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narveson, J., ‘Libertarianism vs. Marxism: Reflections on G.A. Cohen’s Self-Ownership, Freedom and Equality’ (1998) 2 Journal of Ethics 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nedelsky, J., ‘Law, boundaries, and the bounded self’ (1990) 30 Representations 162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nedelsky, J., ‘Property in potential life? A Relational approach to choosing legal categories’ (1993) VI Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, C.M., ‘Bailment and the property/contract interface’ (2015) George Mason Legal Studies Research Paper No. LS 15–12, 1. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2654988Google Scholar
Nicita, A. and Rizzolli, M., ‘Property rules, liability rules and externalities’ (2006) 24 Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice 99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicol, D., Otlowski, M., and Chalmers, D., ‘Consent, commercialisation and benefit-sharing’ (2001) 9 Journal of Law and Medicine 80Google ScholarPubMed
Nuffield Council on Bioethics, Give or Take? Human Bodies in Medicine and Research Consultation Paper, April 2010Google Scholar
Nuffield Council on Bioethics, Human Bodies: Donation for Medicine and Research (London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 2011)Google Scholar
Nuffield Council on Bioethics, Human Tissue: Ethical and Legal Issues (London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 1995)Google Scholar
Nwabueze, R., Biotechnology and the Challenge of Property: Property Rights in Dead Bodies, Body Parts, and Genetic Information (Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Ltd, 2007)Google Scholar
Nwabueze, R., ‘Biotechnology and the new property regime in human bodies and body parts’ (2002) 24 Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review 19Google ScholarPubMed
Nwabueze, R., ‘Body parts in property theory: An integrated framework’ (2014) 40 Journal of Medical Ethics 33CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nwabueze, R., ‘Cadavers, body parts, and the remedial problem’ in Goold, I., Greasley, K., Herring, J., and Skene, L. (eds), Persons, Parts and Property: How Should We Regulate Human Tissue in the 21st Century? (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014), pp. 157–175Google Scholar
O’ Neill, O., Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’ Neill, O., ‘Some limits of informed consent’ (2003) 29 Journal of Medical Ethics 4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Otsuka, M., Libertarianism without Inequality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penner, J.E., ‘The “bundle of rights” picture of property’ (1996) 43 UCLA Law Review 711Google Scholar
Pollock, F. and Wright, R., An Essay on Possession in the Common Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1888)Google Scholar
Priaulx, N. ‘Managing novel reproductive injuries in the law of tort: The curious case of destroyed sperm’ (2010) 17 European Journal of Health Law 81CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Price, D., ‘From Cosmos and Damian to Van Velzen: The human tissue saga continues’ (2003) 11 Medical Law Review 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, D., Human Tissue in Transplantation and Research (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Pufendorf, S., The Political Writings of Samuel Pufendorf, ed. Carr, C.L., trans. Seidles, M.J. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Quigley, M., ‘Propertisation and commercialisation: On controlling the uses of biomaterials’ (2014) 77 Modern Law Review 677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quigley, M., ‘Property: The future of human tissue?’ (2009) 17 Medical Law Review 457CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quigley, M., ‘Property and the body: Applying Honoré’ (2007) 33 Journal of Medical Ethics 631CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quigley, M., ‘Property in human biomaterials: Separating persons and things?’ (2012) 32 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quigley, M. and Skene, L., ‘Human biomaterials and property: Is the law still an ass?’ in Stanton, C., Devaney, S., Farrell, A.M., and Mullock, A. (eds), Pioneering Healthcare Law: Essays in Honour of Margaret Brazier (Abingdon: Routledge, 2016), pp. 156–167Google Scholar
Quong, J., Liberalism without Perfection (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radin, M.J., Contested Commodities (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996, reprinted 2001)Google Scholar
Radin, M.J. and Sunder, M., ‘Introduction: The subject and object of commodification’ in Ertman, M.M. and Williams, J.C. (eds), Rethinking Commodification: Cases and Readings in Law and Culture (New York: New York University Press, 2005), pp. 8–29Google Scholar
Rao, R., ‘Property, privacy, and the human body’ (2000) 80 Boston University Law Review 359Google ScholarPubMed
Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971, rev. 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, J., ‘Right-based moralities’ in Waldron, J. (ed.), Theories of Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984), pp. 182–200Google Scholar
Reid, E.C., ‘Delictual liability and the loss of opportunity of fatherhood: Holdich v Lothian Health Board’ in Simpson, A., Paisley, R., and Bain, D. (eds), Northern Lights: Essays in Private Law in Honour of David Carey Miller (Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press, forthcoming); Edinburgh School of Law Research Paper No. 2015/30, 1–19. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2663063Google Scholar
Reid, K.G.C., ‘Body parts and property’ in Simpson, A., Paisley, R., and Bain, D. (eds), Northern Lights: Essays in Private Law in Honour of David Carey Miller (Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press, forthcoming); Edinburgh School of Law Research Paper No. 2015/25, 1–18. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2644303Google Scholar
Reid, K.G.C. The Law of Property in Scotland (Edinburgh: Butterworths/Law Society of Scotland, 1996)Google Scholar
Rhodes, R., ‘In defense of the duty to participate in biomedical research’ (2008) 8 American Journal of Bioethics 37CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodgers, M.E. ‘Human bodies, inhuman uses: Public reactions and legislative responses to the scandals of bodysnatching’ (2003) 12 Nottingham Law Journal 1Google Scholar
Rose, C.M., ‘Canons of property talk, or, Blackstone’s anxiety’ (1999) 108 Yale Law Journal 601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, C.M., ‘Possession as the origin of property’ (1985) 52 University of Chicago Law Review 73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rostill, L., ‘The ownership that wasn’t meant to be: Yearworth and property rights in human tissue’ (2013) 40 Journal of Medical Ethics 14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rostill, L., ‘Relative title and deemed ownership in English personal property law’ (2015) 35 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Royal Liverpool Children’s Inquiry Report, HC 12–11 (London: The Stationery Office, 2001)Google Scholar
Rothbard, M., For a New Liberty: The Libertarian Manifesto, rev. edn (New York: Libertarian Review Foundation, 1978)Google Scholar
Rudden, B., ‘Economic theory versus property law: The numerus clausus problem’ in Eeklaar, J.M. and Bell, J. (eds), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987), pp. 239–263Google Scholar
Russell, D., ‘Embodiment and self-ownership’ (2010) 27 Social Philosophy and Policy 135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, A. (ed.), The Idea of Freedom: Essays in Honour of Isaiah Berlin (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979)Google Scholar
Satz, D., Why Some Things Should Not Be for Sale: The Moral Limits of Markets (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, J.L., ‘Three’s a crowd: A feminist critique of Calabresi and Melamed’s one view of the cathedral’ (1999) 84 Cornell Law Review 394Google Scholar
Scottish Executive Health Department, Human Tissue (Scotland Act) 2006: A Guide to Its Implications for NHS Scotland (2006)Google Scholar
Scottish Law Commission, Memorandum No. 28, Corporeal Moveables: Mixing Union and Creation (31 August 1976)Google Scholar
Sheach-Leith, V.M., ‘Consent and nothing but consent? The organ retention scandal’ (2007) 29 Sociology of Health and Illness 1023CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shildrick, M., ‘Contesting normative embodiment: Some reflections on the psycho-social significance of heart transplant surgery’ (2008) 1 Perspectives: International Postgraduate Journal of Philosophy 12Google Scholar
Shildrick, M., ‘Corporeal cuts: Surgery and the psycho-social’ (2008) 14 Body and Society 31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shildrick, M., ‘“Why should our bodies end at the skin?”: Embodiment, boundaries, and somatechnics’ (2015) 30 Hypatia 13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shildrick, M., McKeever, P., Abbey, S., Poole, J., and Ross, H., ‘Troubling dimensions of heart transplantation’ (2009) 35 Medical Humanities 35CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simmons, A.J., The Lockean Theory of Rights (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmonds, A.J., ‘Original-acquisition justifications of private property’ (1994) 11 Social Philosophy and Policy 63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, J. and Beerman, J., ‘The social origins of property’ (1993) 6 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skegg, P.D.G., ‘Human corpses, medical specimens and the law of property’ (1976) 4 Anglo-American Law Review 412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skegg, P.D.G., ‘Medical uses of corpses and the no property rule’ (1992) 32 Medicine, Science, and the Law 311CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skene, L., ‘Arguments against people legally ‘owning’ their own bodies, body parts, and tissue’ (2002) 2 Macquarie Law Review 165Google Scholar
Skene, L., ‘The current approach of the courts’ (2014) 40 Journal of Medical Ethics 10CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skene, L., ‘Proprietary interests in human bodily material: Yearworth, recent Australian cases on stored semen and their implications’ (2012) 20 Medical Law Review 227CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skene, L., ‘Proprietary rights in human bodies, body parts and tissue: Regulatory contexts and proposals for new laws’ (2002) 22 Legal Studies 102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smit, M., ‘Alistair Cooke body snatch leader pleads guilty’, The Telegraph (18 March 2008)Google Scholar
Smith, H.E., ‘Exclusion versus governance: Two strategies for delineating property rights’ (2002) 31 Journal of Legal Studies 4S53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, J., Tort Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, H., ‘The fruits of bodybuilders’ labour’ in Dyson, A. and Harris, J. (eds), Ethics and Biotechnology (London: Routledge, 1996), pp. 64–78Google Scholar
Steiner, H., ‘Universal self-ownership and the fruits of one’s labour: A reply to Churchin’ (2008) 16 Journal of Political Philosophy 350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, C., Aparicio, L., Lipworth, W., and Kerridge, I., ‘Public umbilical cord blood banking and charitable trusts’ in Goold, I., Greasley, K., Herring, J., and Skene, L. (eds), Persons, Parts and Property: How Should We Regulate Human Tissue in the 21st Century? (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014), pp. 53–65.Google Scholar
Stewart, C. et al., ‘The problems of biobanking and the law of gifts’ in Goold, I., Greasley, K., Herring, J., and Skene, L. (eds), Persons, Parts and Property: How Should We Regulate Human Tissue in the 21st Century? (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014), pp. 25–38Google Scholar
Stewart, C., Fleming, J., and Kerridge, I., ‘The law of gifts, conditional donation and biobanking’ (2013) 21 Journal of Law and Medicine 351Google ScholarPubMed
Swadling, W.J., ‘Ignorance and unjust enrichment: The problem of title’ (2008) 28 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swadling, W.J., ‘Property: General principles’ in Burrows, A. (ed.), English Private Law, 3rd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 219–402Google Scholar
Taylor, R.S., ‘Self-ownership and the limits of libertarianism’ (2005) 31 Social Theory and Practice 465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Alexander, S., Dove, E.S., Fletcher, I., Mitra, A.G., McMillan, C., and Laurie, G.T., ‘Beyond regulatory compression: Confronting the liminal spaces of health research regulation’ (2017) 8 Law, Innovation, and Technology 149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titmuss, R.M., The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1970)Google Scholar
Tuckness, A., ‘Locke’s political philosophy’ in Zalta, E.N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2012 edn), section 3.Google Scholar
Tutton, R., ‘Person, property, and gift: Exploring languages of tissue donation to biomedical research’ in Corrigan, O. and Tutton, R. (eds), Genetic Databases: Socio-Ethical Issues in the Collection and Use of DNA (Abingdon: Routledge, 2004), pp. 19–38Google Scholar
UK Biobank, ‘Access Procedures: Application and review procedures for access to the UK Biobank Resource’ (2011)Google Scholar
Vallentyne, P., ‘Introduction’ in Vallentyne, P. and Steiner, H. (eds), Left-Libertarianism and Its Critics (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2000), pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Vallentyne, P., ‘Left-libertarianism and liberty’ in Christiano, T. and Christman, J. (eds), Contemporary Debates in Political Philosophy (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2009), pp. 137–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallentyne, P., ‘Libertarianism’ in Zalta, E.N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2010 edn)Google Scholar
Vallentyne, P., ‘Robert Nozick: Anarchy, state and utopia’ in Shand, J. (ed.), The Twentieth Century: Quine and After (Central Works of Philosophy Vol. 5) (Quebec: Acumen Publishing, 2006), pp. 86–103Google Scholar
Vallentyne, P. and Steiner, H. (eds), Left-Libertarianism and Its Critics (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2000).Google Scholar
Vallentyne, P., Steiner, H., and Otsuka, M., ‘Why left-libertarianism is not incoherent, indeterminate, or irrelevant: A reply to Fried’ (2005) 33 Philosophy and Public Affairs 201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Vossen, B., ‘What counts as original appropriation?’ (2009) 8 Politics, Philosophy, and Economics 355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Erp, S., ‘A numerus quasi-clausus of property rights as a constitutive element of future European property law?’ (2003) 7.2 Electronic Journal of Comparative LawGoogle Scholar
van Erp, S. and Akkermans, B., Cases, Materials and Text on Property Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2012)Google Scholar
Wainwright, S.P., Williams, C., Michael, M., Farsides, B., and Cribb, A., ‘Ethical boundary-work in the embryonic stem cell laboratory’ (2006) 28 Sociology of Health and Illness 732CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waldby, C., ‘Stem cells, tissue cultures and the production of biovalue’ (2002) 6 Health 305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldby, C. and Mitchell, R., Tissue Economies: Blood, Organs and Cell Lines in Late Capitalism (Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Waldron, J., ‘Moral autonomy and personal autonomy’ in Christman, J. and Anderson, J. (eds), Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), pp. 307–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, J., Being and Owning: The Body, Bodily Material, and the Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, J., ‘The legal status of body parts: A framework’ (2011) 31 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, J., ‘The trespasses of property’ (2014) 40 Journal of Medical Ethics 19CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webster, A. ‘Stem cell research and society: Lessons from social science’ Bionews (18 August 2008)Google Scholar
Weir, R.F., Olick, R.S., and Murray, J.C., The Stored Tissue Issue: Biomedical Research, Ethics and Law in the Era of Genomic Medicine (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, C., A Theory of Rights: Persons Under Laws, Institutions, and Morals (Totowa: Rowman and Allanheld, 1985)Google Scholar
Wenar, L., ‘Rights’ in Zalta, E.N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2011 edn)Google Scholar
Whitty, N., ‘Rights of personality, property rights, and the human body in Scots law’ (2005) 9 Edinburgh Law Review 194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdows, H., The Connected Self: The Ethics and Governance of the Genetic Individual (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widerquist, K., ‘Lockean theories of property: Justifications for unilateral appropriation’ (2010) 2 Public Reason 2Google Scholar
Wilkinson, D. and Savulescu, J., ‘Should we allow organ donation euthanasia? Alternatives for maximising the number and quality of organs for transplantation’ (2012) 26 Bioethics 32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, S., Bodies for Sale: Ethics and Exploitation in the Human Body Trade (London: Routledge, 2003)Google Scholar
Wilkinson, S., ‘Commodification’ in Ashcroft, R.E. et al. (eds), Principles of Health Care Ethics (Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 2007), pp. 285–291Google Scholar
Wilkinson, T.M., ‘The confiscation and sale of organs’ (2007) 13 Res Publica 327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J.C. and Zelizer, V.A., ‘To commodify or not to commodify’ in Ertman, M.M. and Williams, J.C. (eds), Rethinking Commodification: Cases and readings in Law and Culture (New York and London: New York University Press, 2005), pp. 362–382Google Scholar
Wilson, D., ‘A troubled past? Reassessing ethics in the history of tissue culture’ (2016) 24 Health Care Analysis 246CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winickoff, D.E. and Neumann, L.B., ‘Towards a social contract for genomics: Property and the public in the “biotrust” model’ (2005) 1 Genomics, Society and Policy 8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winickoff, D.E. and Winickoff, R.N., ‘The charitable trust as a model for genomic biobanks’ (2003) 349 New England Journal of Medicine 1180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., Philosophical Investigations, trans. Anscombe, G.E.M. (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1968)Google Scholar
Wolff, J., An Introduction to Political Philosophy, rev. edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar