Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-18T04:57:08.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Embracing Diversity in Empirical Bioethics

from Part I - Theoretical Perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2017

By
Alan Cribb  and
John Owens
Edited by
Jonathan Ives ,
Michael Dunn  and
Alan Cribb
Jonathan Ives
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Michael Dunn
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Alan Cribb
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Empirical Bioethics
Theoretical and Practical Perspectives
 , pp. 103 - 122
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appiah, K.A. 2008. Experiments in Ethics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ashcroft, R. 2008. Fair Process and the Redundancy of Bioethics: A Polemic. Public Health Ethics. 1(1):3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, S. 1998. Ruling Passions: A Theory of Practical Reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borry, P., Schotsmans, P., Dierickx, K. 2008. The Origin and Emergence of Empirical Ethics. In Widdershoven, G., McMillan, J., Hope, T., van der Scheer, L. (eds.), Empirical Ethics in Psychiatry. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 38–51.Google Scholar
Borry, P., Schotsmans, P., Dierickx, K. 2006. Empirical Research in Bioethical Journals: A Quantitative Analysis. Journal of Medical Ethics. 32:240–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bosk, C. 1999. Professional Ethicist Available: Logical, Secular, Friendly. Daedalus. 128(4):47–46.Google ScholarPubMed
Brock, D. 1987. Truth or Consequences: The Role of Philosophers in Policy-Making. Ethics. 97(4):786–791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clouser, K. 1973. Some Things Medical Ethics Is Not. Journal of the American Medical Association. 223(7):787–789.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, G. 2003. Facts and Principles. Philosophy and Public Affairs. 31(3):211–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cribb, A. 2010. Translational Ethics? The Theory Practice Gap in Medical Ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics. 36:207–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, R., Ives, J., Dunn, M. 2015. A Systematic Review of Empirical Bioethics Methodologies. BMC Medical Ethics. Available online: DOI 10.1186/s12910–015–0010–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doris, J., Stich, S. 2005. As a Matter of Fact: Empirical Perspectives on Ethics. In Jackson, F. and Smith, M. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press. Pp. 114–152.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1988. Madness and Civilization. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Fox, R., Swazey, J.P. 1984. Medical Morality Is not Bioethics – Medical Ethics in China and the United States. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine. 27(3):336–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbard, A. 1990. Wise Choices, Apt Feelings: A Theory of Normative Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giubilini, A., Minerva, F. 2012. After-Birth Abortion: Why Should the Baby Live? Journal of Medical Ethics. Available online: DOI 10.1136/medethics-2011-100411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glover, J. 2006. Choosing Children: The Ethical Dilemmas of Genetic Intervention. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glover, J. 1999. Humanity: A Moral History of the Twentieth Century. London: Random House.Google Scholar
Haimes, E. 2002. What Can the Social Sciences Contribute to the Study of Ethics? Theoretical, Empirical and Substantive Considerations. Bioethics. 16(2):89–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, G. 1999. Moral Philosophy Meets Social Psychology: Virtue Ethics and the Fundamental Attribution Error. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 99:315–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, J. 1975. The Survival Lottery. Philosophy. 50:81–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hedgecoe, A. 2004. Critical Bioethics: Beyond the Social Science Critique of Applied Ethics. Bioethics. 18(2):120–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffmaster, B. 1992. Can Ethnography Save the Life of Medical Ethics? Social Science and Medicine. 35(12):1421–1431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ives, J., Dunn, M. 2010. Who’s Arguing? A Call for Reflexivity in Bioethics. Bioethics. 24(5):256–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landeweer, E., Molewijk, B., Widdershoven, G. 2016. Moral Improvement through Interactive Research: A Practice Example of Dialogical Empirical Ethics. This volume.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMillan, J. 2016. Empirical Bioethics and the Fact/Value Distinction. This volume.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMillan, J., Hope, T. 2008. The Possibility of Empirical Psychiatric Ethics. In Widdershoven, G., McMillan, J., Hope, T., van der Scheer, L. (eds.), Empirical Ethics in Psychiatry. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molewijk, A., Stiggelbout, A., Otten, W., Dupuis, H., Kievit, J. 2003. Implicit Normativity in Evidence-Based Medicine: A Plea for Integrated Empirical Ethics Research. Health Care Analysis. 11(1):69–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oswald, M. 2013. Should Policy Ethics Come in Two Colours: Green or White? Journal of Medical Ethics. 39(5):312–315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Putnam, H. 2004. The Collapse of the Fact-Value Dichotomy and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robeyns, I. 2008. Ideal Theory in Theory and Practice. Social Theory and Practice. 37(3):341–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayer, A. 2011. Why Things Matter to People. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scully, J. L. 2016. Feminist Empirical Bioethics. This volume.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. 2009. The Idea of Justice. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Sheehan, M. 2016. Metaethics, Relativism and Empirical Bioethics. This volume.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. 2010. What Is a Person? Rethinking Humanity, Social Life, and the Moral Good from the Person Up. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdershoven, G., Abma, T., Molewijk, B. 2009. Empirical Ethics as Dialogical Practice. Bioethics. 23(4):236–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Widdershoven, G., van der Scheer, L. 2008. Theory and Methodology of Empirical Ethics: A Pragmatic Hermeneutic Perspective. In Widdershoven, G., McMillan, J., Hope, T., van der Scheer, L. (eds.), Empirical Ethics in Psychiatry. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, B. 2006. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×