References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 July 2017
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Wealth ParadoxEconomic Prosperity and the Hardening of Attitudes, pp. 192 - 209Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Aaker, J., & Akutsu, S. (2009). Why do people give? The role of identity in giving. Research Paper 2027, Stanford Graduate School of Business Research Paper Series, May 2009.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W., Fenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Stanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Alaluf, M. (1998). L’émergence du Front national en Belgique est plus redevable aux circonstances qu’à son programme. In Delwit, P., De Waele, J. M., & Rea, A. (Eds), L’extrême droite en France et en Belgique. Brussels: Éditions Complexe.Google Scholar
Altemeyer, R. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.Google Scholar
Andreoni, J. (2001). The economics of philanthropy. In Smelser, N. J. & Baltes, P.B. (Eds), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 11369–11376). Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arzheimer, K. (2009). Contextual factors and the extreme right vote in Western Europe 1980–2002. American Journal of Political Research, 53(2), 259–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arzheimer, K., & Carter, E. (2006). Political opportunity structures and right-wing extremist party success. European Journal of Political Research, 45, 419–443.Google Scholar
Aunel, R. K., & Basil, M. D. (1994). A relational obligation approach to the foot-in-the-mouth effect. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(6), 546–556.Google Scholar
Bale, T. (2003). Cinderella and her ugly sisters: The mainstream and the extreme right in Europe’s bipolarising party systems. West European Politics, 26(3), 67–90.Google Scholar
Barder, O. M., Clarke, J., Lépissier, A., Reynolds, L. E., & Roodman, D. (2012). Europe beyond aid: Assessing Europe’s commitment to development. Centre for Global Development Working Paper (313).Google Scholar
Basil, D. Z., Ridgeway, N., & Basil, M. D. (2006). Guilt appeals: The mediating effect of responsibility. Psychology & Marketing, 23(12), 1035–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastow, S. (1997). Front National economic policy: From neo-liberalism to protectionism. Modern & Contemporary France, 5(1), 61–72.Google Scholar
Beaton, A. M., & Deveau, M. (2005). Helping the less fortunate: A predictive model of collective action. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 1609–1629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, E. M., & Tolnay, S. E. (1990). The killing fields of the deep south: The market for cotton and the lynching of blacks, 1882–1930. American Sociological Review, 55(4), 526–539.Google Scholar
Bekkers, R. (2006). Traditional and health related philanthropy: The role of resources and personality. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68, 349–366.Google Scholar
Bekkers, R., & Schuyt, T. (2008). And who is your neighbor? Explaining denominational differences in charitable giving and volunteering in the Netherlands. Review of Religious Research, 50(1), 74–96.Google Scholar
Bekkers, R. H. F. P., & Wiepking, P. (2011). A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy: Eight mechanisms that drive charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(5), 924–973.Google Scholar
Bettencourt, B. A., & Bartholow, B. D. (1998). The importance of status legitimacy for intergroup attitudes among numerical minorities. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 759–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettencourt, B. A., Dorr, N., Charlton, K., & Hume, D. L. (2001). Status differences and in-group bias: A meta-analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy, and group permeability. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 520–542.Google Scholar
Betz, H.-G. (1993). The new politics of resentment: Radical right-wing populist parties in Western Europe. Comparative Politics, 25(4), 413–427.Google Scholar
Betz, H.-G. (1994). Radical right-wing populism in Western Europe. New York: St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Betz, H.-G. (2009). Xenophobia, identity politics and exclusionary populism in Western Europe. Socialist Register, 39(39), 193–210.Google Scholar
Billig, M. (1973). Normative communication in a minimal intergroup situation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 339–343.Google Scholar
Billig, M. (1976). Social psychology and intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Billig, M., & Tajfel, H. (1973). Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumer, H. (1958). Race prejudice as a sense of group position. Pacific Sociological Review, 1, 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobo, L. D. (1988). Group conflict, prejudice, and the paradox of contemporary racial attitudes. In Katz, P. A. & Taylor, D. A. (Eds), Eliminating racism: Profiles in controversy (pp. 85–114). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Bouclier, T. (2006). Les années Poujade: Une histoire du poujadisme (1953–1958). Paris: Éditions Rémi Perrin.Google Scholar
Branscombe, N. R., & Ellemers, N. (1998). Coping with group-based discrimination: Individualistic versus group-level strategies. In Swim, J. K. & Stangor, C. (Eds), Prejudice: The target’s perspective. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307–324.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B., & Kramer, R. M. (1985). The psychology of intergroup attitudes and behaviour. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 219–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, A. C. (2006). Who really cares: The surprising truth about compassionate conservatism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Brooks, A. C. (2008). The poor give more. Condé Nast Portfolio, March 2008. Retrieved from: www.aei.org/publication/the-poor-give-more/Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1988). Group processes: Dynamics within and between groups. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cai, H., Kwan, V. S. Y., & Sedikides, C. (2012). A socio-cultural approach to narcissism: The case of modern China. European Journal of Personality, 26, 529–535.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1965). Ethnocentric and other altruistic motives. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Carlsmith, J. M., & Gross, A. E. (1969). Some effects of guilt on compliance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 232–239.Google Scholar
Ceobanu, A. M., & Escandell, X. (2010). Comparative analyses of public attitudes toward immigrants and immigration using multinational survey data: A review of theories and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 309–328.Google Scholar
Coenders, M. T. A., & Scheepers, P. (2008). Changes in resistance to the social integration of foreigners in Germany 1980–2000. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 34(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
Coenders, M. T. A., Gijsberts, M. I. L., & Scheepers, P. L. H. (2004). Resistance to the presence of immigrants and refugees in 22 countries. In Gijsberts, M. I. L., Hagendoorn, A. J. M. W., & Scheepers, P. L. H. (Eds), Nationalism and exclusion of migrants: Cross-national comparisons (pp. 97–120). Aldershot: Ashgate Publishers.Google Scholar
Coenders, M. T. A., Lubbers, M., Scheepers, P., & Verkuyten, M. J. A. M. (2008). More than two decades of changing ethnic attitudes in the Netherlands. Journal of Social Issues, 64(2), 269–285.Google Scholar
Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(4), 631–648.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 61–149. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-0Google Scholar
Dambrun, M. Taylor, D. M., McDonald, D. A., Crush, J., & Méot, A. (2006). The relative deprivation-gratification continuum and the attitudes of South Africans toward immigrants: A test of the V-curve hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1032–1044.Google Scholar
Davies, J. C. (1962). Toward a theory of revolution. American Sociological Review, 27(1), 5–19.Google Scholar
De Lange, S. L. (2007). From pariah to power broker: The radical right and government in Western Europe. In Delwit, P., & Poirier, P. (Eds), Extreme droite et pouvoir en Europe. Brussels: Éditions de l’Universite de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
De Wachter, D. (2012). Borderline times: Het einde van de normaliteit. Leuven, Belgium: Lamnoo Campus.Google Scholar
De Witte, H., & Klandermans, B. (2000). Political racism in Flanders and the Netherlands: Explaining differences in the electoral success of extreme right-wing parties. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 26(4), 699–717.Google Scholar
Dekker, P., & Ester, P. (1987). Working-class authoritarianism: A re-examination of the Lipset thesis. European Journal of Political Research, 15(4), 395–415.Google Scholar
Diehl, M. (1990). The minimal group paradigm: Theoretical explanations and empirical findings. In Stroebe, W. & Hewstone, M. (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 263–292). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Dixon, J. C., & Rosenbaum, M.S. (2004). Nice to know you? Testing contact, cultural, and group threat theories of anti-black and anti-Hispanic stereotypes. Social Science Quarterly, 85(2), 257–280.Google Scholar
Doise, W. (1978). Groups and individuals. Explanations in social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dollard, J., Doob, L. W., Miller, N. E., Mowrer, O. H., & Sears, R. R. (1939). Frustration and aggression. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Donnelly, F. K. (2008). The Scottish rising of 1820: A reinterpretation. International Review of Scottish Studies, 6, 27–37.Google Scholar
Doosje, B., Ellemers, N., & Spears, R. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 31, 410–436.Google Scholar
Dorling, D. (2016) The decision of a divided country. British Medical Journal, 354, i3697.Google Scholar
Duckitt, J. (1992/1994). The social psychology of prejudice. New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Eatwell, R. (2006). The concept and theory of charismatic leadership. Totalitarian movements and political religions, 7(2), 141–156.Google Scholar
Ehrenreich, B. (1990). Fear of falling: The inner life of the middle class. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Ellemers, N. (1993). The influence of socio-structural variables on identity enhancement strategies. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 27–57.Google Scholar
Ellemers, N. (2003). Identity, culture, and change in organizations: A social identity analysis and three illustrative cases. In Haslam, A., Van Knippenberg, D., Platow, M., & Ellemers, N. (Eds), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice (pp. 191–204). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Ellemers, N., & Van Rijswijk, W. (1997). Identity needs versus social opportunities: The use of group-level and individual-level identity management strategies. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 52–65.Google Scholar
Ellemers, N., Doosje, B., van Knippenberg, A., & Wilke, H. (1992). Status protection in high status minority groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 123–140.Google Scholar
Ellemers, N., van Knippenberg, A., & Wilke, H. (1990). The influence of permeability of group boundaries and stability of group status on strategies of individual mobility and social change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29(3), 233–246.Google Scholar
Esses, V. M., Haddock, G., & Zanna, M. P. (1993). Values, stereotypes and emotions as determinants of intergroup attitudes. In Mackie, D. M. & Hamilton, D. L. (Eds), Affect, cognition and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 137–166). Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Evans, J. A. J. (2005). The dynamic of social change in radical right-wing populist party support. Comparative European Politics, 3(1), 76–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falter, J. W., & Klein, M. (1994). Wehr wählt rechts? Die Whäler und Anhänger des rechtsextremisticher Parteien im vereinigten Deutschland. Munich: Verlag C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Ford, R., & Goodwin, M. J. (2014). Revolt on the right: Explaining support for the radical right in Britain. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Frank, R. H. (1999). Luxury fever: Why money fails to satisfy in an era of excess. New York: Free Press, Princeton University.Google Scholar
Giving USA (2013). The annual report on philanthropy for the year 2012. Lilly Family, School of Philanthropy. Indiana University.Google Scholar
Golder, M. (2003). Explaining variation in the success of extreme right parties in Western Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 36(4), 432–466.Google Scholar
González, K. V., Verkuyten, M., & Poppe, E. (2008). Prejudice towards Muslim in the Netherlands: Testing integrated threat theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(4), 667–685.Google Scholar
Govaert, S. (1998). Le programme economique du Vlaams Blok. In Delwit, P., De Waele, J. M., & Rea, A. (Eds), L’extreme droite en France et en Belgique. Brussels: Éditions Complexe, 119–131.Google Scholar
Graham, R. (1977). Loaves and liberty: Women in the French Revolution. In Bridenthal, R., & Koonz, C. (Eds), Becoming visible: Women in European history (pp. 236–254). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Green, D. P., Glaser, J., & Rich, A. (1998). From lynching to gay bashing: The elusive connection between economic conditions and hate crime. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 82–92.Google Scholar
Greve, F. (2009, May 19). America’s poor are its most generous. McClatchy Newspapers. Retrieved from www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/article24538864.htmlGoogle Scholar
Grofman, B. N., & Muller, E. N. (1973). The strange case of relative gratification and potential for political violence: The V-curve hypothesis. American Political Science Review, 67, 514–539.Google Scholar
Guimond, S., & Dambrun, M. (2002). When prosperity breeds intergroup hostility: The effects of relative deprivation and relative gratification on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 900–912.Google Scholar
Haigh, B. (2015, April 24). If we were ever the lucky country, we aren’t now [Blog post]. Retrieved from www.abc.net.au/news/2015–04-24/haigh-if-we-were-ever-the-lucky-country-we-arent-now/6411240Google Scholar
Hamilton, R. F. (1984). Braunschweig 1932: Further evidence on the support for National Socialism. Central European History, 17(1), 3–36.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. (1963) The evolution of altruistic behavior. American Naturalist, 97(896), 354–356.Google Scholar
Hanson, F. (2011). Australia and the world: Public opinion and foreign policy. Lowy Institute for International Policy.Google Scholar
Harsin, J. (2002). Barricades: The war of the streets of revolutionary Paris, 1830–1848. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Harvey, S. P., & Bourhis, R. Y. (2011). Discrimination in wealth and power structures. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15, 21–38.Google Scholar
Harvey, S. P., & Bourhis, R. Y. (2013). Discrimination between the rich and the poor under contrasting conditions of wealth stratification. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 351–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslam, S. A. (2004). Psychology in organisations: The social identity approach (2nd edn). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Haslam, S. A., & Reicher, S. D. (2007). Beyond the banality of evil: Three dynamics of an interactionist social psychology of tyranny. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 615–622.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Boyd, R. Bowles, S., Camerer, C. Fehr, E., Gintis, H., & McElreath, R. (2001). In search of homo economicus: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. American Economic Review, 91, 73–78.Google Scholar
Henry, J. (2013). De sociale staat van Nederland 2013. Social en Cultureel Planbureau. Den Haag, December 2013. www.scribd.com/doc/190876096/De-Sociale-Staat-Van-Nederland-2013Google Scholar
Henson, S., Lindstrom, J., Haddad, L., & Mulmi, R. (2010). Public perceptions of international development and support for aid in the UK: Results of a qualitative enquiry. IDS Working Papers, 2010(353), 1–67.Google Scholar
Hepworth, J. T., & West, S. G. (1988). Lynchings and the economy: A time-series reanalysis of Hovland and Sears (1940). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 239–247.Google Scholar
Heywood, C. (1995). The development of the French economy, 1750–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O., & Rothschild, M. (1973). The changing tolerance for income inequality in the course of economic development. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87, 544–566.Google Scholar
Hood, M., & Morris, I. (1997). ‘Amigo o Enemigo’: Context, attitudes, and Anglo public opinion toward immigration. Social Science Quarterly, 78, 309–323.Google Scholar
Hornsey, M. J., & Jetten, J. (2011). Impostors within groups: The psychology of claiming to be something you are not. In Jetten, J. & Hornsey, M. J. (Eds), Rebels in groups: Dissent, deviance, difference, and defiance (pp. 158–178). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hovland, C. J., & Sears, R. R. (1940). Minor studies in aggression: VI correlation of lynchings with economic indices. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 9, 301–310.Google Scholar
Ignazi, P. (1992). The silent counter-revolution: Hypotheses on the emergence of extreme right-wing parties in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 22, 3–34.Google Scholar
Independent Sector (2002). Giving and volunteering in the United States (pp. 28–29). Washington DC: Independent Sector.Google Scholar
Irvine, W.D. (1988). French Royalists and Boulangism. French Historical Studies, 15(3), 395–406.Google Scholar
Ivarsflaten, E. (2005). The vulnerable populist right parties: No economic realignment fuelling their electoral success. European Journal of Political Research, 44(3), 465–492.Google Scholar
Jackman, R. W., & Volpert, K. (1996). Conditions favouring parties of the extreme right in Western Europe. British Journal of Political Science, 26(4), 501–521.Google Scholar
James, R. N., & Sharpe, D. L. (2007) The nature and causes of the U-shaped charitable giving profile. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36, 218–238.Google Scholar
Jefferson, P. N., & Pryor, F. L. (1999). On the geography of hate. Economics Letters, 65(3), 389–395.Google Scholar
Jenks, J. W., & Lauck, W. J. (1912). The immigration problem. New York: Funk & Wagnalis.Google Scholar
Jetten, J., & Mols, F. (2014). 50:50 hindsight: Appreciating anew the contributions of Milgram’s obedience experiments. Journal of Social Issues, 70(3), 587–602.Google Scholar
Jetten, J., Chu, A., & Mols, F. (2017). Wealth and the fear of being overtaken. Manuscript in preparation. University of Queensland.Google Scholar
Jetten, J., Mols, F., Healy, N., & Spears, R. (2017). Fear of falling: Economic instability enhances collective angst among societies’ wealthy. Journal of Social Issues.Google Scholar
Jetten, J., Mols, F., & Postmes, T. (2015). Relative deprivation and relative wealth enhances anti-immigrant sentiments: The v-curve re-examined. PLoS ONE, 10(10): e0139156.Google Scholar
Jetten, J., Ryan, R., & Mols, F. (in press). Stepping in the shoes of leaders of populist right-wing parties: Promoting anti-immigrant views in times of economic prosperity. Social Psychology.Google Scholar
Jetten, J., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1997). Strength of identification and intergroup differentiation: The influence of group norms. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 603–609.Google Scholar
Jonas, E., Schimel, J., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (2002). The scrooge effect: Evidence that mortality salience increases pro-social attitudes and behaviour. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(10), 1342–1353.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–920.Google Scholar
Kearney, H. (1997). Contested Ideas of Nationhood 1800–1995. The Irish Review, 20(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Kim, M. (2012). Unfairly disadvantaged? Asian Americans and unemployment during and after the Great Recession (2007–10). Issue Brief #323, 5 April 2012.Google Scholar
Kinder, D. R., & Sears, D. O. (1981). Prejudice and politics: Symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(3), 414–431.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H. (1995). The radical right in Western Europe: A comparative analysis. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kobrynowicz, D., & Branscombe, N. R. (1997). Who considers themselves victims of discrimination? Individual difference predictors of perceived gender discrimination in women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 347–363.Google Scholar
Kolinsky, E. (1992). A future for right extremism in Germany? In Hainsworth, P. (Ed), The extreme right in Europe and the USA (pp. 61–94). New York: St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Koopmans, R. (1996). Explaining the rise of racist and extreme right violence in Western Europe: Grievances or opportunities? European Journal of Political Research, 30, 185–216.Google Scholar
Koopmans, R., Statham, P., Giugni, M., & Passy, F. (2005). Contested citizenship: Immigration and cultural diversity in Europe. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press.Google Scholar
Kraus, M. W., & Keltner, D. (2009). Signs of socioeconomic status: A thin-slicing approach. Psychological Science, 20, 99–106.Google Scholar
Krueger, A., & Pischke, J. (1997). A statistical analysis of crime against foreigners in unified Germany. Journal of Human Resources, 32, 182–209.Google Scholar
Lalonde, R. N., & Silverman, R. A. (1994). Behavioral preference in response to social injustice: The effects of group permeability and social identity salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 78–85.Google Scholar
LeBlanc, J., Beaton, A. M., & Walker, I. (2015). The downside of being up: A new look at group relative gratification and traditional prejudice. Social Justice Research, 28, 143–167.Google Scholar
Lerner, M. J., & Miller, D. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1030–1051.Google Scholar
LeVine, R. A., & Campbell, D. T. (1972). Ethnocentrism: Theories of conflict, ethnic attitudes, and group behavior. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Lipset, S. M., & Raab, E. (1978). The politics of unreason: Right-wing extremism in America, 1790–1977 (2nd edn). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lombroso, C. (1876) L’uomo delinquent studiato in rapport all’antropologia, alla medicina legale e alle discipline carcerarie. Milan: Hoepli.Google Scholar
Lubbers, M., & Scheepers, P. (2000). Individual and contextual characteristics of the German extreme right-wing vote in the 1990s: A test of complementary theories. European Journal of Political Research, 41, 345–378.Google Scholar
Lubbers, M., Gijsberts, M., & Scheepers, P. (2002). Extreme right-wing voting in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 41, 345–378.Google Scholar
Lucassen, G., & Lubbers, M. (2012). Who fears what? Explaining far-right-wing preference in Europe by distinguishing perceived cultural and economic ethnic threat. Comparative Political Studies, 45(5), 547–574.Google Scholar
Lusher, D., & Haslam, N. (2007). Yearning to breathe free: Seeking asylum in Australia. Annandale: The Federation Press.Google Scholar
Marmot, M. (2006). Status syndrome: How your social standing directly affects your health and life expectancy. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Mayda, A. M. (2006). Why are people more pro-trade than pro-migration? Economics Letters, Elsevier, 101(3), 160–163.Google Scholar
Merkl, P. H., & Weinberg, L. (2003). Right-wing extremism in the twenty-first century. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Merriman, J. (1996) A history of modern Europe: From the French Revolution to the present. New York: WW Norton.Google Scholar
Messick, D. M., & Mackie, D. M. (1989). Intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 45–81.Google Scholar
Meuleman, B., Bavidov, E., & Biliet, J. (2009). Changing attitudes toward immigration in Europe, 2002–2007: A dynamic group conflict theory approach. Social Science Research, 38(2), 352–365.Google Scholar
Middendorp, C. P., & Meloen, J. D. (1990). The authoritarianism of the working class revisited. European Journal of Political Research, 18(2), 257–267.Google Scholar
Middendorp, C. P., & Meloen, J. D. (1990). The authoritarianism of the working class revisited. European Journal of Political Research, 18(2), 257–267.Google Scholar
Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Minkenberg, M. (2000). The renewal of the radical right: Between modernity and anti-modernity. Government and Opposition, 2, 170–188.Google Scholar
Mintz, A. (1946). A re-examination of correlations between lynchings and economic indices. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41(2), 154–160. doi:10.1037/h0056837Google Scholar
Mitchell, L. (2014, December 8). The wealthy suffer from an ‘empathy gap’ with the poor that is feeding a rise in inequality [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/the-wealthy-suffer-from-an-empathy-gap-with-the-poor-that-is-feeding-a-rise-in-inequality-34226Google Scholar
Mols, F., & Jetten, J. (2014). No guts, no glory: How framing the collective past paves the way for anti-immigrant sentiments. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 43, 74–86.Google Scholar
Mols, F. & Jetten, J. (2015). Explaining the appeal of populist right-wing parties in times of economic prosperity. Political Psychology, 37, 275–292. doi: 10.1111/pops.12258.Google Scholar
Mols, F., & Jetten, J. (2016b). Why Brexit and Trump are NOT Working Class Revolts. ABC Religion and Ethics. Retrieved from: http://www.abc.net.au/religion/articles/2016/11/15/4575585.htmGoogle Scholar
Mols, F., & Weber, M. (2013) Laying sound foundations for SIT inspired EU attitude research: Beyond attachment and deeply rooted identities. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(3), 505–521.Google Scholar
Moscatelli, S., Albarello, F., Prati, F., & Rubini, M. (2014). Badly off or better off than them? The impact of relative deprivation and relative gratification on intergroup discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 248–262.Google Scholar
Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mudde, C. (2010). The populist radical right: A pathological normalcy. West European Politics, 33(6), 1167–1186.Google Scholar
Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2013). Scarcity: Why having too little means so much. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
Mullen, B., Brown, R., & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103–122.Google Scholar
Ng, S. H. (1981). Equity theory and the allocations of rewards between groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 439–443.Google Scholar
O’Loughlin, J., Flint, C., & Shin, M. (1995). Regions and milieux in Weimar Germany: The Nazi Party vote of 1930 in geographic perspective. Erdkunde, 49(4), 305–314.Google Scholar
Olzak, S. (1990). The political context of competition: Lynching and urban racial violence, 1882–1914. Social Forces, 69, 395–421.Google Scholar
Otten, S., Mummendey, A., & Blanz, M. (1996). Intergroup discrimination in positive and negative outcome allocations: Impact of stimulus valence, relative group status, and relative group size. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 568–581.Google Scholar
Oyserman, D., & Lee, S. W. S. (2008). Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 311–342.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1942). Review of dimensions of society: A quantitative systematics for the social sciences by Stuart Carter Dodd. American Sociological Review, 7(5), 709–714.Google Scholar
Parssinen, T. M. (1973). Association, convention and anti-parliament in British radical politics, 1771–1848. The English Historical Review, 88(348), 504–533.Google Scholar
Pentland, G. (2015). The spirit of the union: Popular politics in Scotland. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Perroulaz, G., Fioroni, C., & Carbonnier, G. (2010). Trends and issues in international development cooperation. International Development Policy, 1, 143–160.Google Scholar
Piff, P. K. (2014). Wealth and the inflated self: Class, entitlement, and narcissism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 34–43.Google Scholar
Piff, P. K., Kraus, M. W., Côté, S., Cheng, B. H., & Keltner, D. (2010). Having less, giving more: The influence of social class on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(5), 771–784.Google Scholar
Piff, P. K., Stancato, D. M., Côté, S., Mendoza-Denton, R., & Keltner, D. (2012). Higher social class predicts increased unethical behaviour. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 4086–4091.Google Scholar
Postmes, T., & Smith, L. G. E. (2009). Why do the privileged resort to oppression: A look at some intragroup factors. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 769–790.Google Scholar
Postmes, T., & Branscombe, N. R. (Eds). (2010). Rediscovering social identity. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Pratt, T. C., & Cullen, F. T. (2005). Assessing macro-level predictors and theories of crime: A meta-analysis. In Tony, M. (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 32) (pp. 373–450). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741–776.Google Scholar
Quillian, L. (1995). Prejudice as a response to perceived group threat: Population composition and anti-immigrant and racial prejudice in Europe. American Sociological Review, 60, 586–611.Google Scholar
Quillian, L. (2006). New approaches to understanding racial prejudice and discrimination. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 299–328.Google Scholar
Rabbie, J. M., & Horowitz, M. (1969). Arousal of ingroup-outgroup bias by a chance win or loss. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 269–277.Google Scholar
Rapley, M. (1998). ‘Just an ordinary Australian’: Self-categorization and the discursive construction of facticity in ‘new racist’ political rhetoric. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37(3), 325–344.Google Scholar
Reed, J. S., Doss, G. E., & Hulbert, J. S. (1987). Too good to be false: An essay in the folklore of social science. Sociological Inquiry, 57, 1–11.Google Scholar
Reicher, S. D., & Haslam, S. A. (2011). After shock? Towards a social identity explanation of the Milgram ‘obedience’ studies. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 163–169.Google Scholar
Renneville, M. (2012). Lombroso in France: A paradoxical reception. In Knepper, P. & Ystehede, P. J. (Eds), The Cesare Lombroso handbook. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Riek, B. M., Mania, E. W., & Gaertner, S. L. (2006). Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 336–353.Google Scholar
Roberts, G. (2005). Cooperation through interdependence. Animal Behavior, 70, 901–908.Google Scholar
Roodman, D. (2008, October 14). History says financial crisis will suppress aid. Global Development: Views from the Center.Google Scholar
Rooney, P. M., & Frederick, H. K. (2007). Portraits of donors: Bank of America study of high net-worth philanthropy. Centre on Philanthropy, Bloomington: Indiana University.Google Scholar
Rothgerber, H. (1997). External intergroup threat as an antecedent to perceptions of ingroup and outgroup homogeneity. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 73, 1206–1212.Google Scholar
Rothwell, J. T., & Diego-Rosell, P. (2016) Explaining nationalist views: The case of Donald Trump, SSRN Draft Working Paper, available on-line at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Papers.cfm?abstract_id=2822059Google Scholar
Roux, C., Goldsmith, K., & Bonezzi, A. (2012). On the consequences of a scarcity mindset: Why thoughts of having less can lead to taking (and giving) more. Available online at SSRN 2147919.Google Scholar
Roy, J. P. (1998). Le programme economique et social du Front national en France. In Delwit, P., De Waele, J. M., & Rea, A. (Eds), L’extreme droite en France et en Belgique (pp. 85–100). Brussels: Éditions Complexe.Google Scholar
Rubin, M., & Hewstone, M. (2004). Social identity, system justification, and social dominance: Commentary on Reicher, Jost et al., and Sidanius et al. Political Psychology, 25, 823–844.Google Scholar
Rudé, G. (1964). The crowd in history: A study of popular disturbances in France and England, 1930–1848. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Runciman, W. C. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Rydgren, J. (2005). Is extreme-right populism contagious? Explaining the emergence of a new party family. European Journal of Political Research, 44, 413–437.Google Scholar
Rydgren, J. (2007). The sociology of the radical right. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 241–262.Google Scholar
Sachdev, I., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1985). Social categorization and power differentials in group relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 415–434.Google Scholar
Sachdev, I., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1987). Status differentials and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 277–293.Google Scholar
Sachdev, I., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1991). Power and status differentials in minority and majority group relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 1–24.Google Scholar
Savelkoul, M., Scheepers, P., Tolsma, J., & Hagendoorn, L. (2011). Anti-Muslim attitudes in the Netherlands: Tests of contradictory hypotheses derived from ethnic competition theory and intergroup contact theory. European Sociological Review, 27(6), 741–758.Google Scholar
Scheepers, D. T., & Ellemers, N. (2005). When the pressure is up: The assessment of social identity threat in low and high status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(2), 192–200.Google Scholar
Scheepers, D. T., Ellemers, N., & Sintemaartensdijk, N. (2009). Suffering from the possibility of status loss: Physiological responses to social identity threat in high status groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(6), 1075–1092.Google Scholar
Scheepers, P., Gijsberts, M., & Coenders, M. (2002). Ethnic exclusionism in European countries: Public opposition to civil rights for legal migrants as a response to perceived ethnic threat. European Sociological Review, 18, 17–34.Google Scholar
Schervish, P. G., & Havens, J. J. (2002). The Boston area diary study and the moral citizenship of care. Voluntas, 13(1), 47–71.Google Scholar
Schissel, B., Wanner, R., & Frideres, J.S. (1989). Social and economic context and attitudes toward immigrants in Canadian cities. The International Migration Review, 23(2), 289–308.Google Scholar
Semyonov, M., Raijman, R., & Gorodzeisky, A. (2006). The rise in anti-foreigner sentiment in European societies, 1988–2000. American Sociological Review, 71, 426–449.Google Scholar
Sherif, M. (1966). In common predicament: Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Sherif, M., & Sherif, C. W. (1953). Groups in harmony and tension: An integration of studies of intergroup relations. Oxford: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. W. (1961). Intergroup cooperation and competition: The Robbers’ Cave experiment. Norman: University Book Exchange.Google Scholar
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999) Social dominance: An intergoup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Small, D. A., & Simonsohn, U. (2008). Friends of victims: Personal experience and pro-social behaviour. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 532–542.Google Scholar
Smith, H., & Pettigrew, T. F. (2015). Advances in relative deprivation theory and research. Social Justice Research, 28, 1–6.Google Scholar
Smith, H., Pettigrew, T. F., Pippin, G., & Bialosiewicz, S. (2012). Relative deprivation: A theoretical and meta-analytic critique. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(3), 203–232.Google Scholar
Snibbe, A. C., & Markus, H. R. (2005). You can’t always get what you want: Educational attainment, agency, and choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 703–720.Google Scholar
Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Ellemers, N. (1997). Ingroup stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 538–553.Google Scholar
Spruyt, M. (1995). Grove borstels: Stel dat het Vlaams Blok morgen zijn programma realiseert, hoe zou Vlaanderen er dan uitzien? Leuven: Van Halewyck.Google Scholar
St. Claire, L., & Turner, J. C. (1982). The role of demand characteristics in the social categorization paradigm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 307–314.Google Scholar
Stephan, W. G., Ybarra, O., & Bachman, G. (1999). Prejudice toward immigrants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(11), 2221–2237.Google Scholar
Stipek, D. J., & Ryan, R. H. (1997). Economically disadvantaged pre-schoolers: Ready to learn but further to go. Developmental Psychology, 33, 711–723.Google Scholar
Stokkom, B. (2010). Wat een hufter! Ergernis, lichtgeraaktheid en maatschappelijke verruwing. Amsterdam: Boom.Google Scholar
Stöss, R. (1991). Politics against democracy: Right-wing extremism in West Germany. New York: St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Stouffer, S. A., Suchman, E. A., De Vinney, L. C., Star, S. A., & Williams, R. M. Jr. (1949). The American soldier: Adjustment during army life, Volume I. Princeton Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223, 96–102.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1978). Interindividual behaviour and intergroup behaviour. In Tajfel, H. (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 27–60). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1–39.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H., & Billig, M. (1974). Familiarity and categorization in intergroup behaviour. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 159–170.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Austin, W. G. & Worchel, S. (Eds), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–48). Monterey: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Worchel, S. & Austin, W. G (Eds), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson Hall.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H., & Wilkes, A. L. (1963). Classification and quantitative judgement. British Journal of Psychology, 54, 101–114.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149–178.Google Scholar
Taylor, P., Kochhar, R., Fry, R., Velasco, G., & Motel, S. (2011). Wealth gap rise to record highs between Whites, Blacks and Hispanics (Vol. 26). Washington, DC: Pew Research Centre, July.Google Scholar
Tienhaara, N. (1974). Canadian views on immigration and population: An analysis of post-war Gallup polls. Ottawa: Department of Manpower and Immigration.Google Scholar
Tilly, C., Tilly, L., & Tilly, R. (1975). The rebellious century: 1830–1930. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tougas, F., & Veilleux, F. (1990). The response of men to affirmative action strategies for women: The study of a predictive model. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 22, 424–432.Google Scholar
Traugott, M. (2010). The insurgent barricade. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C. (1975). Social comparison and social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 5–34.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C. (1981). The experimental social psychology of intergroup behaviour. In Turner, J. C. & Giles, H. (Eds), Intergroup behaviour (pp. 66–101). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C., & Brown, R. (1978). Social status, cognitive alternatives, and intergroup relations. In Tajfel, H. (Ed), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 202–234). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
UK House of Commons (2009). Aid under pressure: Support for development assistance in a global economic downturn. Fourth report, International Development Committee.Google Scholar
Utz, S. (2004). Self-construal and cooperation: Is the interdependent self more cooperative than the independent self? Self and Identity, 3, 177–190.Google Scholar
Van Kessel, S. (2013). A matter of supply and demand: The electoral performance of populist parties in three European countries. Government and Opposition, 48(2), 175–199.Google Scholar
Vanbeselaere, N., Boen, F., van Avermaet, E., & Buelens, H. (2006). The Janus face of power in intergroup contexts: A further exploration of the noblesse oblige effect. The Journal of Social Psychology, 146, 685–699.Google Scholar
Vanneman, R. D., & Pettigrew, T. F. (1972). Race and relative deprivation in the urban United States. Race, 13, 461–486.Google Scholar
Veblen, T. (1994/1899). The theory of the leisure class: An economic study of institutions. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Vossen, K. (2010). Populism in the Netherlands after Fortuyn: Rita Verdonk and Geert Wilders compared. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 11(1), 22–38.Google Scholar
Walker, I., & Smith, H.J. (2001). Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wear, R. (2008). Permanent populism: The Howard government 1996–2007. Australian Journal of Political Science, 43(4), 617–634.Google Scholar
Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 548–573.Google Scholar
Wiepking, P., & Breeze, B. (2012). Feeling poor, acting stingy: The effect of money perceptions on charitable giving. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 17, 13–24.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. (2009). The spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Wilson, R., & Hainsworth, P. (2012). Far-right parties and discourse in Europe: A challenge for our times. European Network Against Racism, ENAR March 2012.Google Scholar
Wong, R. Y., & Hong, Y. (2005). Dynamic influences of culture on cooperation in the prisoner’s dilemma. Psychological Science, 16, 429–434.Google Scholar
Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994–1003.Google Scholar