Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T17:29:49.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Section 4 - The general orthopaedics and pathology oral

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2017

Edited by
Paul A. Banaszkiewicz  and
Deiary F. Kader
Paul A. Banaszkiewicz
Affiliation:
Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead
Deiary F. Kader
Affiliation:
Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Postgraduate Orthopaedics
The Candidate's Guide to the FRCS (Tr & Orth) Examination
 , pp. 225 - 420
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ficat, RP. Idiopathic bone necrosis of the femoral head. Early diagnosis and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985;67:3–9.Google Scholar
Mont, MA, Hungerford, DS. Non-traumatic avascular necrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:459.Google Scholar
Lewinnek, GE, Lewis, JL, Tarr, R, Compere, CL, Zimmerman, JR. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:217–220.Google Scholar
Harris, WH, McCarthy, JC Jr, O’Neill, DA. Femoral component loosening using contemporary techniques of femoral cement fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:1063–7.Google Scholar
Gruen, TA, McNeice, GM, Amstutz, HC. Modes of failure of cemented stem-type femoral components: A radiographic analysis of loosening Clin Orthop. 1979;141:17–27.Google Scholar
Barrack, RL, Mulroy, RD Jr, Harris, WH. Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty: A 12-year radiographic review J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:385–9.Google Scholar
Engh, CA, Bobyn, JD, Glassman, AH. Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987;69-B:45–55.Google Scholar
Deirmengian, GK, Zmistowski, B, O'Neil, JT, Hozack, WJ. Management of acetabular bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:1842–1852.Google Scholar
Reid, C, Grobler, GP, Dower, BJ, Nortje, MB, Walters, J. Revision total hip arthroplasty: Addressing acetabular bone loss. SA Orthop J. 2012;11:34–46.Google Scholar
Brooker, AF, Bowerman, JW, Robinson, RA, Riley, LH Jr. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement: Incidence and a method of classification J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973;55:1629–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Gautier, E, Ganz, K, Krügel, N, Gill, T, Ganz, R. Anatomy of the medial femoral circumflex artery and its surgical implications. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:679–83.Google Scholar
Babis, G, Sakellariou, V, Parvizi, J, Soucacos, P. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Orthopedics. 2011;34:39–48.Google Scholar
Jones, JP. Concepts of etiology and early pathogenesis of osteonecrosis. Instructional Course Lect. 1994;43:499–512.Google Scholar
Banaszkiewicz, PA. Idiopathic bone necrosis of the femoral head. Early diagnosis and treatment. Classic Papers in Orthopaedics.London: Springer; 2014: pp. 121–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, DG, Rao, VM, Dalinka, MK, et al. Femoral head necrosis: Correlation of MR imaging, radiographic staging, radionuclide imaging, and clinical findings. Radiology. 1987;162:709–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohzono, K, Sugano, N, Takaoka, K, et al. Natural history of nontraumatic avascular necrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:68–72.Google Scholar
Agarwala, S, Shah, S, Joshi, VR. The use of alendronate in the treatment of avascular necrosis of the femoral head: Follow-up to 8 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:1013–18.Google Scholar
Rajpura, A, Wright, AC, Board, TN. Medical management of osteonecrosis of the hip: A review. Hip. 2011;21:385–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aigner, N, Petje, G, Schneider, W, et al. Juvenile bone-marrow oedema of the acetabulum treated by iloprost. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:1050–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reis, ND, Schwartz, O, Militianu, D, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy as a treatment for stage-I avascular necrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:371–5.Google Scholar
Camporesi, EM, Vezzani, G, Bosco, G, Mangar, D, Bernasek, TL. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in femoral head necrosis. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25(suppl):118–23.Google Scholar
Mont, MA, Marulanda, GA, Jones, LC, et al. Systematic analysis of classification systems for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:16–26.Google ScholarPubMed
Tanzer, M, Bobyn, JD, Krygier, JJ, Karabasz, D. Histopathologic retrieval analysis of clinically failed porous tantalum osteonecrosis implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1282–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mont, MA, Jones, LC, Hungerford, DS. Nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: Ten years later. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1117–32.Google Scholar
Sugioka, Y, Hotokebuchi, T, Tsutsui, H. Transtrochanteric anterior rotational osteotomy for idiopathic and steroid-induced necrosis of the femoral head. Indications and long-term results. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1992;277:111–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kabata, T, Maeda, T, Tanaka, K, et al. Hemi-resurfacing versus total resurfacing for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Orthop Surg. 2011;19:177–80.Google Scholar
Amstutz, HC, Le Duff, MJ. Hip resurfacing for osteonecrosis: two- to 18-year results of the Conserve Plus design and technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2016;98-B(7):901–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Cheung, KW, Chiu, KH, Chung, KY. Long-term result of cementless femoral stem in avascular necrosis of the hip. Hip Int. 2015;2 5:72–5.Google Scholar
Johannson, HR, Zywiel, MG, Marker, DR. Osteonecrosis is not a predictor of poor outcomes in primary total hip arthroplasty: A systematic literature review. Int Orthop. 2010;35:465–73.Google Scholar
Chandler, HP, Reineck, FT, Wixson, RL, McCarthy, JC. Total hip replacement in patients younger than 30 years old. A 5-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63:1426–34.Google Scholar
Stauffer, RN. Ten-year follow-up study of total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:983–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fyda, TM, Callaghan, JJ, Olejniczak, J, Johnston, RC. Minimum ten-year follow-up of cemented total hip replacement in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Orthop Trans. 2002;22:8–19.Google Scholar
Garino, JP, Steinberg, ME. Total hip arthroplasty in patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head: A 2- to 10-year follow-up. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1997;334:108–15.Google Scholar
Kim, Y-H, Oh, S-H, Kim, JS, Koo, K-H. Contemporary total hip arthroplasty with and without cement in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:675–81.Google Scholar
Mont, MA, Zywiel, MG, Marker, DR, et al. The natural history of untreated asymptomatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: A systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:2165–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nam, KW, Kim, YL. Fate of untreated asymptomatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:477–84.Google Scholar
Mont, MA, Jones, LC, Hungerford, DS.Nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: Ten years later. J Bone Joint Surg Am.2006; 88: 1117–32.Google Scholar
Mont, MA, Hungerford, DS. Non-traumatic avascular necrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:459–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirst, P, Esser, M, Murphy, JC, Hardinge, K. Bone grafting for protrusio acetabuli during total hip replacement. A review of the Wrightington method in 61 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987;69:229–33.Google ScholarPubMed
Armbuster, TG, Guerra, J, Resnick, D, et al. The adult hip: An anatomic study. Radiology. 1978;128:1–10.Google Scholar
Leunig, M, Nho, SJ, Turchetto, L, Ganz, R. Protrusio acetabuli: New insights and experience with joint preservation. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2009;467:2241–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garcia-Cimbrelo, E, Diaz-Martin, A, Madero, R, Munera, L. Loosening of the cup after low-friction arthroplasty in patients with acetabular protrusion. The importance of the position of the cup. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:108–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bayley, JC, Christie, MJ, Ewald, FC, Kelley, K. Long-term results of total hip arthroplasty in protrusio acetabuli. J Arthrop. 1987;2:275–9.Google Scholar
Baghdadi, YMK, Larson, AN, Sierra, RJ. Restoration of the hip center during THA performed for protrusio acetabuli is associated with better implant survival. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2013;471:3251–9.Google Scholar
Sturridge, S, Bankes, M. Focus on acetabular dysplasia in adults. J Bone Joint Surg. 2010;32:1–3.Google Scholar
Clohisy, JC, Carlisle, JC, Beaulé, PE, et al. A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krych, AJ. Total hip arthroplasty with shortening subtrochanteric osteotomy in Crowe type-IV developmental dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:2213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewinnek, GE, Lewis, JL, Tarr, R, Compere, CL, Zimmerman, JR. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:217–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunt, LP. Ninety-day mortality after 409 096 total hip replacements for osteoarthritis, from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales: A retrospective analysis. Lancet 382;2013:1097–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ji, HM, Kim, KC, Lee, YK, Ha, YC, Koo, KH. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: A randomised clinical trial of a posterior approach and a modified lateral approach. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:378–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedlundh, U, Ahnfelt, L, Hybbinette, CH, Weckstrom, J, Fredin, H. Surgical experience related to dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:206–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Battaglia, TC, Mulhall, KJ, Brown, TE, Saleh, KJ. Increased surgical volume is associated with lower THA dislocation rates. Clin Orthop. 2006;447:28–33.Google Scholar
Woo, RY, Morrey, BF. Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:1295–306.Google Scholar
Tsukayama, DT, Estrada, R, Gustilo, RB. Infection after total hip arthroplasty. A study of 106 infections. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:512–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lidwell, OM, Lowbury, EJ, Whyte, W, et al. Effect of ultraclean air in operating rooms on deep sepsis in the joint after total hip or knee replacement: A randomised study. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 1982;285:10–14.Google Scholar
Glithero, PR, Grigoris, P, Herding, LK, et al. White cell scans and infected joint replacements. Failure to detect chronic infection. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:371–4.Google Scholar
Robbins, GM, Masri, BA, Garbuz, DS, Duncan, C. Evaluation of pain in patients with apparently solidly fixed total hip arthroplasty components. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2002;10:86–94.Google Scholar
Lonner, JH, Desai, P, Dicesare, PE, Steiner, G, Zuckerman, JD.The reliability of analysis of intraoperative frozen sections for identifying active infection during revision hip or knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:1553–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmerli, W, Trampuz, A, Ochsner, PE. Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1645–54.Google Scholar
Buchholz, HW, Elson, RA, Engelbrecht, E, et al. Management of deep infection of total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1981;63:342–53.Google Scholar
Wroblewski, BM. One-stage revision of infected cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1986;211:103–7.Google Scholar
Zeller, V, Hotellier, L, Marmor, S, et al. One-stage exchange arthroplasty for chronic periprosthetic hip infection: Results of a large prospective cohort study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:e1.Google Scholar
Engesæter, LB, Dale, H, Schrama, JC, Hallan, G, Lie, SA. Surgical procedures in the treatment of 784 infected THAs reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2011;82:530–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matar, WY, Jafari, SM, Restrepo, C, et al. Preventing infection in total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:36–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gruen, TA, McNeice, GM, Amstutz, HC. Modes of failure of cemented stem-type femoral components: A radiographic analysis of loosening Clin Orthop. 1979;141:17–27.Google Scholar
Harris, WH, McCarthy, JC Jr, O’Neill, DA. Femoral component loosening using contemporary techniques of femoral cement fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:1063–7.Google Scholar
Kwong, LM, Jasty, M, Mulroy, RD, et al. The histology of the radiolucent line. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74:67–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrack, RL, Mulroy, RD Jr, Harris, WH. Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. A 12-year radiographic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74:385–9.Google Scholar
Mulroy, WF, Estok, DM, Harris, WH. Total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second-generation cementing techniques. A fifteen-year-average follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:1845–52.Google Scholar
Jasty, M, Maloney, WJ, Bragdon, CR, et al. The initiation of failure in cemented femoral components of hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:551–8.Google Scholar
Berry, DJ, Pellicci, PM, Tria, AJ, et al. Evolution of uncemented femoral component design. In Pellicci, PM, Tria, AJ Garvin, K (eds). Orthopaedic Knowledge Update: Hip and Knee Reconstruction. Rosemont, IL: Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2000, pp. 117–27.Google Scholar
Khanuja, HS, Vakil, JJ, Goddard, MS, Mont, MA. Cementless femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:500–9.Google Scholar
Carrothers, AD, Gilbert, RE, Jaiswal, A, Richardson, JB. Birmingham hip resurfacing: The prevalence of failure. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:1344–50.Google Scholar
Langton, DJ, Jameson, SS, Joyce, TJ, et al. Accelerating failure rate of the ASR total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:1011–16.Google Scholar
Glyn-Jones, S, Pandit, H, Kwon, YM, et al. Risk factors for inflammatory pseudotumour formation following hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:1566–74.Google Scholar
Dee Haan, R, Pattyn, C, Gill, HS, et al. Correlation between inclination of the acetabular component and metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:1291–7.Google Scholar
Smith, AJ, Dieppe, P, Vernon, K, et al. Failure rates of stemmed metal-on-metal hip replacements: Analysis of data from the National Joint Registry of England and Wales. Lancet. 2012;379:1199–204.Google Scholar
Langton, DJ, Jameson, SS, Joyce, TJ, et al. Accelerating failure rate of the ASR total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:1011–16.Google Scholar
Brockett, CL, Harper, P, Williams, S, et al. The influence of clearance on friction, lubrication and squeaking in large diameter metal-on-metal hip replacements. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008;19:1575–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Smet, K, Campbell, PA, Gill, HS. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: A consensus from the advanced hip resurfacing course, Ghent, June 2009. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:335–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Brooker, AF, Bowerman, JW, Robinson, RA, Riley, LH Jr. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973;55:1629–32.Google Scholar
Horwitz, BR, Rockowitz, NL, Goll, SR, et al. A prospective randomised comparison of two surgical approaches to total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1993;291:154–63.Google Scholar
Vavken, P, Castellani, L, Sculco, TP. Prophylaxis of heterotopic ossification of the hip: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2009;467:3283–9.Google Scholar
Toom, A, Fischer, K, Märtson, A, Rips, L, Haviko, T. Interobserver reliability in the assessment of heterotopic ossification: Proposal of a combined classification. Int Orthop. 2005;29:156–9.Google Scholar
Wright, JG, Moran, E, Bogoch, E. Reliability and validity of the grading of heterotopic ossification. J Arthrop. 1994;9:549–53.Google Scholar
Hardinge, K, Williams, D, Etienne, A, MacKenzie, D, Charnley, J. Conversion of fused hips to low friction arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1977;59:385–92.Google ScholarPubMed
Kim, YY, Ko, CU, Ahn, JY, Yoon, YS, Kwak, BM. Charnley low friction arthroplasty in tuberculosis of the hip. An 8 to 13-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988;70:756–60.Google Scholar
Kim, SJ, Postigo, R, Koo, S, Kim, JH. Total hip replacement for patients with active tuberculosis of the hip: A systematic review and pooled analysis. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B:578–82.Google Scholar
Fairbank, TJ. Knee joint changes after meniscectomy J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1948;30:664–70.Google Scholar
Tapper, EM, Hoover, NW. Late results after meniscectomy J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51:517–26Google Scholar
Johnson, RJ, Kettelkamp, DB, Clark, W, Leaverton, P. Factors effecting late results after meniscectomy J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974;56:719–29.Google Scholar
Daniel, DM, Stone, ML, Dobson, BE, Fithian, DC, Rossman, DJ, Kaufman, KR. Fate of the ACL-injured patient: A prospective outcome study Am J Sports Med. 1994;22:632–644Google Scholar
Noyes, FR, Butler, DL, Grood, ES, Zernicke, RF, Hefzy, MS. Biomechanical analysis of human ligament grafts used in knee-ligament repairs and reconstructions J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:344–52.Google Scholar

References

Thompson, WO, Thaete, FL, Fu, FH, Dye, SF. Tibial meniscal dynamics using 3-dimensional reconstruction of magnetic-resonance images. Am J Sports Med. 1991;19:210–16.Google Scholar
Arnoczky, SP, Warren, RF. Microvasculature of the human meniscus. Am J Sports Med. 1982;10:90–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, SJ, Aadalen, KJ, Malaviya, P, et al. Tibiofemoral contact mechanics after serial medial meniscectomies in the human cadaveric knee. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:1334–44.Google Scholar
Allaire, R, Muriuki, M, Gilbertson, L, Harner, CD. Biomechanical consequences of a tear of the posterior root of the medial meniscus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1922–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Girolamo, D, Galliera, E, Volpi, P, et al. Why menisci show higher healing rate when repaired during ACL reconstruction? Growth factors release can be the explanation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Artrosc. 2015;23:90–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Smith, JP III, Barrett, GR. Medial and lateral meniscal tear patterns in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees: A prospective analysis of 575 tears. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29:415–19.Google Scholar
Felson, DT, Zhang, Y. An update on the epidemiology of knee and hip osteoarthritis with a view to prevention. Arthritis Rheum. 1998;41:1343–55.Google Scholar
Cannon, WD, Vittori, JM. The incidence of healing in arthroscopic meniscal repairs in anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees versus stable knees. Am J Sports Med. 1992;20:176–81.Google Scholar
Barber, FA, Schroeder, FA, Oro, FB, Beavis, RC. FasT-Fix meniscal repair: Mid-term results. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:1342–8.Google Scholar
Harris, JD, Brophy, RH, Siston, RA, Flanigan, DC. Treatment of chondral defects in the athelete’s knee. Arthroscopy. 2010;26:841–52.Google Scholar
Edmonds, EW, Polousky, J. A review of knowledge in osteochondritis dissecans: 123 years of minimal evolution from König to the ROCK study group. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013;471:1118–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brittberg, M, Winalski, CS. Evaluation of cartilage injuries and repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(Suppl 2):58–69.Google Scholar
Zaslav, K, Cole, B, Brewster, R, et al. A prospective study of autologous chondrocyte implantation in patients with failed prior treatment for articular cartilage defect of the knee results of the study of the treatment of articular repair (STAR) clinical trial. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:42–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becher, C, Huber, R, Thermann, H, Paessler, HH, Skrbensky, G. Effects of a contoured articular prosthetic device on tibiofemoral peak contact pressure: A biomechanical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16:56–63.Google Scholar
Parsons, EM, Gee, AO, Spiekerman, C, Cavanagh, PR. The biomechanical function of the anterolateral ligament of the knee. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:669–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, AS, Meier, SW. Approach to cartilage injury in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. Orthop Clin North Am. 2003;34:149–67.Google Scholar
Johnson, DL, Urban, WP, Caborn, DNM, et al. Articular cartilage changes seen with magnetic resonance imaging – Detected bone bruises associated with anterior cruciate rupture. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26:409–14.Google Scholar
Sutton, KM, Bullock, JM. Anterior cruciate ligament rupture: Differences between males and females. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013;21:41–50.Google Scholar
Dodds, AL, Halewood, C, Gupte, CM, Williams, A, Amis, AA. The anterolateral ligament: anatomy, length changes and association with the Segond fracture. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B:325–31.Google Scholar
McDaniel, WJ, Dameron, TB. Untreated ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament – A follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62:696–705.Google Scholar
McDaniel, WJ, Dameron, TB. The untreated anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;172:158–63.Google Scholar
Koga, H, Muneta, T, Yagishita, K, et al. Mid- to long-term results of single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Randomised controlled trial. Arthroscopy. 2014;ii:S0749–8063.Google Scholar
Tiamklang, T, Sumanont, S, Foocharoen, T, Laopaiboon, M. Double-bundle versus single-bundle reconstruction for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;11:CD008413.Google Scholar
Driscoll, MD, Isabell, GP Jr, Conditt, MA, et al. Comparison of two femoral tunnel locations in anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A biomechanical study. Arthroscopy. 2012;28:1481–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Redler, LH, Brafman, RT, Trentacosta, N, Ahmad, CS. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients with transphyseal tunnels. Arthroscopy. 2012;28:1710–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noyes, FR, Barber-Westin SD. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with human allograft: comparison of early and later results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:524–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, JG, Lim, HC, Kim, HJ, et al. Delayed detection of clinically significant posterior cruciate ligament injury after periarticular fracture around the knee of 448 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012;132:1741–6.Google Scholar
Dickson, KF, Galland, MW, Barrack, RL, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee after ipsilateral femur fracture. J Orthop Trauma. 2002;16:567–71.Google Scholar
Li, Y, Li, J, Wang, J, Gao, S, Zhang, Y. Comparison of single-bundle and double-bundle isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allograft: A prospective, randomised study. Arthroscopy. 2014;30:695–700.Google Scholar
Natsuhara, KM, Yeranosian, MG, Cohen, JR, et al. What is the frequency of vascular injury after knee dislocation? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:2615–20.Google Scholar
Medina, O, Arom, GA, Yeranosian, MG, Petrigliano, FA, McAllister, DR. Vascular and nerve injury after knee dislocation: A systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:2621–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gollehon, DL, Torzilli, PA, Warren, RF. The role of the posterolateral and cruciate ligaments in the stability of the human knee – A biochemical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69-A:233–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grood, ES, Stowers, SF, Noyes, FR. Limits of movement in the human knee – Effect of sectioning the posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral structures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70:88–97.Google Scholar
Dye, SF. The pathophysiology of patellofemoral pain – A tissue homeostasis perspective. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;436:100–10.Google Scholar
Desio, SM, Burks, RT, Bachus, KN. Soft tissue restraints to lateral patellar translation in the human knee. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26:59–65.Google Scholar
Nomura, E, Horiuchi, Y, Inoue, M. Correlation of MR imaging findings and open exploration of medial patellofemoral ligament injuries in acute patellar dislocations. Knee. 2002;9:139–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stephen, JM, Lumpaopong, P, Deehan, DJ, Kader, D, Amis, AA. The medial patellofemoral ligament: Location of femoral attachment and length change patterns resulting from anatomic and nonanatomic attachments. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40:1871–9.Google Scholar
Stephen, JM, Kaider, D, Lumpaopong, P, Deehan, DJ, Amis, AA. The effect of femoral tunnel position and graft tension on patellar contact mechanics and kinematics after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:364–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lippacher, S, Dreyhaupt, J, Williams, SR, Reichel, H, Nelitz, M. Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament: Clinical outcomes and return to sports. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:1661–8.Google Scholar
Ackroyd, CE, Newman, JH, Evans, R, Eldridge, JD, Joslin, CC. The Avon patellofemoral arthroplasty: Five-year survivorship and functional results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:310–15.Google Scholar
Odumenya, M, Costa, ML, Parsons, N, et al. The Avon patellofemoral joint replacement: five-year results from an independent centre. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:56–60.Google Scholar
Iwano, T, Kurosawa, H, Tokuyama, H, Hoshikawa, Y. Roentographic and clinical findings of patellofemoral arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;252:190–7.Google Scholar
Van Jonbergen, HP, Poolman, RW, van Kampen, A. Isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Acta Orthop. 2010;81:199–205.Google Scholar
Van Jonbergen, HPW, Werkman, DM, van Kampen, A. Conversion of patellofemoral arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty. A matched case-control study of 13 patients. Acta Orthop. 2009;80:62–6.Google Scholar
Blatter, G, Jackson, RW, Bayne, O, Magerl, F. Patellectomy as a salvage procedure. Orthopade. 1987;16:310–16.Google Scholar
O’Connor, MI. Sex differences in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Br. 2007;15:S22–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Peyron, J, Altman, R. The epidemiology of osteoarthritis. In Moskowitz, R, Howell, D, Goldberg, V, Mankin, H (eds). Osteoarthritis: Diagnosis and Management, second edn. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1992, pp. 15–37.Google Scholar
Felson, DT, Chaisson, CE. Understanding the relationship between body weight and osteoarthritis. Baillières Clin Rheumatol. 1997;11:671–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feeley, BT, Gallo, RA, Sherman, S, Williams, RJ. Management of osteoarthritis of the knee in the active patient. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010;18:406–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkley, A, Birmingham, TB, Litchfield, RB, et al. A randomised trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee. N Eng J Med. 2008;359:1097–107.Google Scholar
Li, Y, Zhang, H, Zhang, J, et al. Clinical outcome of simultaneous high tibial osteotomy and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction for medial compartment osteoarthritis in young patients with anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees: A systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2014;14:S749–803.Google Scholar
Fujisawa, Y, Masuhara, K, Shiomi, S. The effect of high tibial osteotomy on osteoarthritis of the knee: An arthroscopic study of 54 knee joints. Orthop Clin North Am. 1979;10:585–608.Google Scholar
Hernigou, P, Medevielle, D, Debeyre, J, Goutallier, D. Proximal tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis with varus deformity. A 10 to 13-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69:332–54.Google Scholar
Brinkman, JM, Lobenhoffer, P, Agneskirchner, JD, et al. Osteotomies around the knee: Patient selection, stability of fixation and bone healing in high tibial osteotomies. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:1548–57.Google Scholar
Coventry, MB, Ilstrup, DM, Wallrichs, SL. Proximal tibial osteotomy – A critical long-term study of 87 case. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:196–201.Google Scholar
Luna, JT, Sembrano, JN, Gioe, TJ. Mobile and fixed-bearing (all-polyethylene tibial component) total knee arthroplasty designs surgical . J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92-A:240–9.Google Scholar
Oh, KJ, Pandher, DS, Lee, SH, Joon, SDS Jr, Lee, ST. Meta-analysis comparing outcomes of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing prostheses in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:873–84.Google Scholar
Jeffery, RS, Morris, RW, Denham, RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:709–14.Google Scholar
Fang, DM, Ritter, MA, Davis, KE. Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty – Just how important is it? J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:39–43.Google Scholar
Parratte, S, Pagnano, MW, Trousdale, RT, Berry, DJ. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92-A:2143–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, RSJ, Boone, JL, Rosenzweig, SD, Steger-May, K, Barrack, RL. Patellar resurfacing compared with nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A concise follow-up of a randomised trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:2562–7.Google Scholar
Van Jonbergen, HP, Scholtes, VA, Poolman, RW. A randomised, controlled trial of circumpatellar electrocautery in total knee replacement without patellar resurfacing: A concise follow-up at a mean of 3.7 years. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B:473–8.Google Scholar
Roberts, DW, Hayes, TD, Tate, CT, Lesko, JP. Selective patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: A prospective, randomised, double-blind study. J Arthroplasty. 2014;14:5403.Google Scholar
Barrack, RL, Bertot, AJ, Wolfe, MW, et al. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty – A prospective, randomised, double-blind study with five to seven years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83–A:1376–81.Google Scholar
Keblish, PA, Varma, AK, Greenwald, AS. Patellar resurfacing or retention in total knee arthroplasty – A prospective study of patients with bilateral replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76-B:930–7.Google Scholar
Wood, DJ, Smith, AJ, Collopy, D, et al. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty – A prospective, randomised tria. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:187–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartier, P, Sanouiller, JL, Khefacha, A. Long-term results with the first patellofemoral prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;436:47–54.Google Scholar
White, SH, Ludkowski, PF, Good fellow, JW. Anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:582–6.Google Scholar
Kumar, V, Pandit, HG, Liddle, AD, et al. Comparison of outcomes after UKA in patients with and without chondrocalcinosis: A matched cohort study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015, Mar 19. (Epub ahead of print)Google Scholar
Sarraf, KM, Konan, S, Pastides, PS, Haddad, FS, Oussedik, S. Bone loss during revision of unicompartmental to total knee arthroplasty: An analysis of implanted polyethylene thickness from the National Joint Registry data. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28:1571–4.Google Scholar
Della Valle, C, Parvizi, J, Bauer, TW, et al. Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010;18:760–70.Google Scholar
Pang, HN, Naudie, DD, McCalden, RW, MacDonald, SJ, Teeter, MG. Highly crosslinked polyethylene improves wear but not surface damage in retrieved acetabular liners. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014, Aug 13. (Epub ahead of print)Google Scholar
Sakellariou, VI, Sculco, P, Poultsides, L, Wright, T, Sculco, TP. Highly cross-linked polyethylene may not have an advantage in total knee arthroplasty. HSS J. 2013;9:264–9.Google Scholar
Berbari, E, Mabry, T, Tsaras, G, et al. Inflammatory blood laboratory levels as markers of prosthetic joint infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:2102–9.Google Scholar
Singer, J, Merz, A, Frommelt, L, Fink, B. High rate of infection control with one-stage revision of septic knee prostheses excluding MRSA and MRSE. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:1461–71.Google Scholar
Romanò, CL, Gala, L, Logoluso, N, Romanò, D, Drago, L. Two-stage revision of septic knee prosthesis with articulating knee spacers yields better infection eradication rate than one-stage or two-stage revision with static spacers. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20:2445–53.Google Scholar
Sarraf, KM, Atherton, DD, Jayaweera, AR, Gibbons, CE, Jones, I. Salvage of the lower limb after a full thickness burn with loss of the knee extensor mechanism. J Orthop Surg Hong Kong. 2013;21:122–4.Google Scholar
Garratt, AM, Brealey, S, Gillespie, WJ, Team, DT. Patient-assessed health instruments for the knee: A structured review. Rheumatology. 2004;43:1414–23.Google Scholar
Rothwell, AG, Hooper, GJ, Hobbs, A, Frampton, CM. An analysis of the Oxford hip and knee scores and their relationship to early joint revision in the New Zealand Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:413–18.Google Scholar

References

Glazebrook, MA Evidence-based indications for ankle arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:1478–90.Google Scholar
Grennan, DM, Gray, J, Loudon, J, et al. Methotrexate and early postoperative complications in patients with rheumatoid arthritis undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001;60:214–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haddad, SL, Coetzee, JC, Estok, R, et al. Intermediate and long-termoutcomes of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis: A systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1899–905.Google Scholar
Jordan, RW, Chahal, GS, Chapman, A. Is end-stage ankle arthrosis best managed with total ankle replacement or arthrodesis? A systematic review. Adv Orthop. 2014;2014:986285.Google Scholar
SrBuechel, FF, Buechel, FF Jr, Pappas, MJ. Twenty-year evaluation of cementless mobile-bearing total ankle replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;424:19–26.Google Scholar
Wood, PL, Sutton, C, Mishra, V, Suneja, R. A randomised, controlled trial of two mobile bearing total ankle replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;91:69–74.Google Scholar
Gougoulias, NE, Khanna, A, Maffuli, N. Total ankle arthroplasty. Br Med Bull. 2009;89:111–51.Google Scholar
Glazebrook, MA, Arsenault, K, Dunbar, M. Evidence-based classification of complications in total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30:945–9.Google Scholar
Coester, LM, Saltzman, CL, Leupold, J, Pontarelli, W. Long-term results following ankle arthrodesis for post-traumatic arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83–A:219–28.Google Scholar
Johnson, JE, James, RY. Arthrodesis techniques in the management of stage-II and III acquired adult flatfoot deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1865–76.Google Scholar

References

Medical Research Council. Aids to the Examination of the Peripheral Nervous System. London: Elsevier, 2000.Google Scholar
Fardon, D, Nomeclature, Milette P. and classification of lumar disc pathology. Recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, American Society of Radiology and American Society of Neurology. Spine. 2001;26:5.Google Scholar
Weinstein, JN, Lurie, D, Tosteson, TD, et al. Surgical compared with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Four-year results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:1295–304.Google Scholar
Gibson, JA, Waddell, G. Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;4:CD001352.Google Scholar
Murrey, D, Janssen, M, Delamarter, R, et al. Results of the prospective, randomised, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease. Spine J. 2009 9:275–86.Google Scholar
Spine 2013 Volume 38 – Issue 23. (A useful online video presentation available on the AO Spine website.)Google Scholar
NICE Technology Appraisal Guidance (TA279). Percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty for treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. April 2013.Google Scholar
NICE Clinical Guideline 75. Metastatic spinal cord compression. November 2008.Google Scholar
Wiltse, LL, Newman, PH, MacNab, I. Classification of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1976;117:23–9.Google Scholar
Haller, JM, Iwanik, M, Shen, FH. Clinically relevant anatomy of recurrent laryngeal nerve. Spine. 2012;37:97–100.Google Scholar
Klazen, CA, Lohle, PN, de Vries, J, et al. Vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (Vertos II): An open-label randomised trial. Lancet. 2010;376:1085–92.Google Scholar
Buchbinder, R, Osborne, RH, Ebeling, PR, et al. A randomised trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:557–68.Google Scholar
Jacobs, W.C.H., et al., Total Disc Replacement for Chronic Discogenic Low Back Pain: A Cochrane Review. Spine, 2013;38(1):24–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bibliography/further reading

Bullough’s Orthopaedic Pathology provides an extensive overview of bony and soft-tissue lesions and includes numerous x-rays and histology slides. The clarity and order of his book has given much inspiration for the layout of this chapter7.

Papp et al.’s immersion orthopaedic pathology article in J Bone Joint Surg Am is also very useful as further reading for the exam21.

NICE. Guidance on Improving Cancer Services: Improving Outcomes for People with Sarcoma. The Manual. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2006.Google Scholar
Enneking, WF, Spanier, SS, Malawer, MM. The effect of the anatomic setting on the results of surgical procedures for soft parts sarcoma of the thigh. Cancer. 1981;47:1005–22.Google Scholar
Enneking, WF, Spanier, SS, Goodman, MA. Current concepts review. The surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62:1027–30.Google Scholar
NCCN. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Bone Cancer. V.1.2009. London: National Comprehensive Cancer Network; 2009.Google Scholar
NCCN. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Soft Tissue Sarcoma. V.2.2008. London: National Comprehensive Cancer Network; 2008.Google Scholar
NCIN. Bone Sarcomas: Incidence and Survival Rates in England. London: National Cancer Intelligence Network; 2010.Google Scholar
Bullough, PG. Orthopaedic Pathology, Fourth Edition. Edinburgh: Mosby; 2007.Google Scholar
Aigner, T. Towards a new understanding and classification of chondrogenic neoplasias of the skeleton – Biochemistry and cell biology of chondrosarcoma and its variants. Virchows Archiv. 2002;441:219–30.Google Scholar
Jeys, L, Grimer, R. The long-term risks of infection and amputation with limb salvage surgery using endoprostheses. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2009;179:75–84.Google Scholar
Jeys, LM, Kulkarni, A, Grimer, RJ, et al. endoprosthetic reconstruction for the treatment of musculoskeletal tumors of the appendicular skeleton and pelvis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1265–71.Google Scholar
Schuetze, SM, Arbor, A. Chemotherapy in the management of osteosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma. J Nat Comp Cancer Net. 2007;5:449–55.Google Scholar
BOA. Metastatic Bone Disease: A Guide to Good Practice. London: British Orthopaedic Association; 2001.Google Scholar
Mirels, H. Metastatic disease in long bones. A proposed scoring system for diagnosing impending pathological fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;249:256–64.Google Scholar
Beckingsale, TB, Gerrand, CH. The management of soft-tissue sarcomas. Orthop Trauma. 2009;23:240–47.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, SA, Tepper, J, Glatstein, E, et al. The treatment of soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities – Prospective randomised evaluations of (1) limb-sparing surgery plus radiation therapy compared with amputation and (2) the role of adjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg. 1982;196:305–15.Google Scholar
Yang, JC, Chang, AE, Baker, AR, et al. Randomised prospective study of the benefit of adjuvant radiation therapy in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity. J Clinic Oncol. 1998;16:197–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Sullivan, B, Davis, AM, Trucotte, R, et al. Preoperative verses postoperative radiotherapy in soft-tissue sarcoma of the limbs: A randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359:2235–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, AM, O'Sullivan, B, Turcotte, R, et al. Late radiation morbidity following randomisation to preoperative verses postoperative radiotherapy in exrtemity soft tissue sarcoma. Radiother Oncol. 2005;75:48–53.Google Scholar
SMAC. Adjuvant chemotherapy for localised resectable soft tissue sarcoma in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;Issue 4.Google Scholar
Pervaiz, N, Colterjohn, N, Farrokhyar, F, et al. A systematic meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of adjuvant chemotherapy for localized resectable soft-tissue sarcoma. Cancer. 2008;113:573–81.Google Scholar
Papp, DF, Johnston, JC, Carrino, JA, et al. Immersion education for orthopaedic pathology: A review of the orthopaedic in-training examination and American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Certification. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:152–60.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×