Book contents
- Regulating Reproductive Donation
- Regulating Reproductive Donation
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Editors, contributors and discussants
- Book part
- Introduction
- 1 The development of governance and regulation of donor conception in the UK
- Part I International, cross-border and global issues
- Part II How many children per donor?
- Part III Donors
- Part IV Information about donors
- Index
- References
1 - The development of governance and regulation of donor conception in the UK
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 March 2016
Book contents
- Regulating Reproductive Donation
- Regulating Reproductive Donation
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Editors, contributors and discussants
- Book part
- Introduction
- 1 The development of governance and regulation of donor conception in the UK
- Part I International, cross-border and global issues
- Part II How many children per donor?
- Part III Donors
- Part IV Information about donors
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Regulating Reproductive Donation , pp. 14 - 36Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
References
Bartholomew, G.W. (1958). ‘The development and use of artificial insemination’. Eugenics Review, 49, 187–95.Google ScholarPubMed
Bartholomew, G.W. (1960). ‘The report of the Feversham Committee – a sterile solution’. University of Malaya Law Review, 2, 201–25.Google Scholar
Barton, M., Walker, K. and Wiesner, B.P. (1945). ‘Artificial insemination’. British Medical Journal, i, 40–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brudenell, M., McLaren, A., Short, R. and Symonds, M. (eds.) (1976). Artificial Insemination. Proceedings of the Fourth Study Group of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Social Security (1987). Human Fertilisation and Embryology: A Framework for Legislation. Cmd 259. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Dunstan, G.R. (1973). ‘Moral and social issues arising from A.I.D’, in Wolstenholme, G.E.W. and Fitzsimons, D.W. (eds.), Law and Ethics of A.I.D. and Embryo Transfer. Ciba Foundation Symposium, 17, (New Series). Amsterdam: Associated Scientific Publishers.Google Scholar
Dunstan, G.R. (1976). ‘Ethical issues relating to AID’, in Brudenell, M., McLaren, H., Short, R. and Symonds, M. (eds.), Artificial Insemination: Proceedings of the Fourth Study Group. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.Google Scholar
Edwards, R.E.Google Scholar
Edwards, R.G. and Steptoe, P.C. (1973). ‘Biological aspects of embryo transfer’, in Wolstenholme, G.E.W. and Fitzsimons, D.W. (eds.), Law and Ethics of A.I.D. and Embryo Transfer. Ciba Foundation Symposium, 17, (New Series) Amsterdam: Associated Scientific Publishers.Google Scholar
Feversham (1960). Home Office and Scottish Home Department. Report of the Departmental Committee on Human Artificial Insemination. Cmnd 1105. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Forbes, R. (1945). ‘The medico-legal aspects of artificial insemination’. Criminology Review, 12, 138–93.Google Scholar
Freeman, T. (2014). ‘Introduction’, in Freeman, T., Ebtehaj, F., Graham, S. and Richards, M. (eds.), Relatedness in Assisted Reproduction: Families, Origins and Identities. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glass, D.V. (1960). ‘Human infertility and artificial insemination: the demographic background’. Journal. Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 123, 174–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glover, W.K. (1948). Artificial Insemination among Human Beings: Medical, Legal and Moral Aspects. The Catholic University of American Studies in Sacred Theology. (Second Series), No. 15.Google Scholar
Guttmacher, A. (1943). ‘The role of artificial insemination in the treatment of human sterility’. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 19, 573–91.Google ScholarPubMed
Guttmacher, A. (1946). ‘The legitimacy of artificial insemination’. Human Fertility, 11, 16–21.Google ScholarPubMed
Haines, E. (2002). ‘Issues of gender in gamete donation’. Social Science and Medicine, 36, 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajnal, J. (1960). Artificial insemination and the frequency of incestuous marriage. Journal of Royal Statistical Society. Series A, 123, 182–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) (2006). Unpublished statistics. London: HFEA.Google Scholar
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) (2011). Donation Review. Compensation of Donors and Benefits in Kind. London: HFEA.Google Scholar
Jackson, M.H., Malleson, J., Stallworthy, J. and Walker, K. (1948). Problems of Fertility in General Practice. London: Hamish Hamilton Medical Books.Google Scholar
Konrad, M. (1998). ‘Ova donation and symbols of substance. Some variations on the themes of sex, gender and the partible body’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. (N.S.), 4, 643–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane-Roberts, C., Sharman, A., Walker, K. and Wiesner, B.P. (1939). Sterility and Impaired Fertility. Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Treatment. London: Hamish Hamilton Medical Books.Google Scholar
Peel, J. (1973). ‘Annual Report of Council. Appendix V: Report of Panel on Human Artificial Insemination’. British Medical Journal, Supplement, 3–5.Google Scholar
Price, F. (1995). ‘The donor, the recipient and the child – human egg donation in licenced UK clinics’. Journal of Child and Family Law Quarterly, 7, 145–51.Google Scholar
Richards, M. (2008). ‘Artificial insemination and eugenics: celibate motherhood, eutelegenesis and germinal choice’. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biology and Biomedical Sciences, 39, 211–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richards, M. (2014). ‘A British history of collaborative reproduction and the rise of the genetic connection’, in Freeman, T., Graham, S., Ebetahaj, F. and Richards, M. (eds.), Relatedness in Assisted Reproduction: Families, Origins and Identities. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rohleder, H. (1934). Test Tube Babies: A History of the Artificial Impregnation of Human Beings. New York: The Panurge Press.Google Scholar
Schellen, A.M.C.M. (1957). Artificial Insemination in the Human. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Squier, S.M. (1994). Babies in Bottles: Twentieth-Century Visions of Reproductive Technology. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Stoop, D., Cobo, A. and Silber, S. (2014). ‘Fertility preservation for age-related fertility decline’. Lancet, 384, 1311–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swanson, K.W. (2012). ‘Adultery by doctor: artificial insemination 1890–1945’. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 87, 561–633.Google Scholar
Wand, J.W.C. (1948). Artificial Human Insemination: The Report of a Commission Appointed by His Grace the Archbishop of Canterbury. London: S.P.C.K.Google Scholar
Warnock, M. (1984). Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embryology. Cmnd 9314. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
White, M.M. and Green-Armitage, V.B. (1962). The Management of Impaired Fertility. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, B. (1973). ‘Contribution to discussion: moral, social and ethical issues’, in Wolstenholme, G.E.W. and Fitzsimons, D.W. (eds.), Law and Ethics of A.I.D. and Embryo Transfer. Ciba Foundation Symposium, 17, (New Series). Amsterdam: Associated Scientific Publishers.Google Scholar
Wilson, S. (1997). ‘Identity, genealogy and the social family: the case of donor insemination’. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 11, 270–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolstenholme, G.E.W. and Fitzsimons, D.W. (eds.) (1973). Law and Ethics of A.I.D. and Embryo Transfer. Ciba Foundation Symposium, 17, (New Series). Amsterdam: Associated Scientific Publishers.Google Scholar
Cases
MacLennan v. MacLennan [1958]S.C.105.
Orford v. Orford [1921]58. D.L.R. 251.
Russell v. Russell [1924]AC 721.
Legislation
The Adoption of Children Act 1926.
The Legitimacy Act 1926.
The Perjury Act 1911.
Family Law Reform Act 1987.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990, as amended 2008.
Surrogacy Arrangements Act 1985.