Adams, M. and Bomhoff, J. ‘Comparing Law: Practice and Theory’, in Adams, M. and Bomhoff, J. (eds.), Practice and Theory in Comparative Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), 1–21.Google Scholar

Adams, M. and Bomhoff, J. (eds.). Practice and Theory in Comparative Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, M. and Griffiths, J. ‘Against “Comparative Method”: Explaining Similarities and Differences’, in Adams, M. and Bomhoff, J. (eds.), Practice and Theory in Comparative Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), 279–301.Google Scholar

Aguilar Alvarez, G. and Reisman, W.M. ‘How Well are Investment Awards Reasoned?’, in Aguilar Alvarez, G. and Reisman, W.M. (eds.), The Reasons Requirement in International Investment Arbitration (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alvarez, J.E. ‘Beware: Boundary Crossing’, in Kahana, T. and Scolnicov, A. (eds.), Boundaries of Rights, Boundaries of State (forthcoming 2015).Google Scholar

Alvarez, J.E. ‘Crossing the Public/Private Divide: Saipem v. Bangladesh and Other “Crossover” Cases’, ICCA Congress Series No. 16, Singapore 2012, 2–28.Google Scholar

Alvarez, J.E. ‘The Evolving BIT’, in Laird, I.A. and Weiler, T. (eds.), Investment Treaty Arbitration and International Law (New York: Juris, 2010), ch. 1.Google Scholar

Alvarez, J.E. The Public International Law Regime Governing International Investment (The Hague: Hague Academy of International Law, 2011).Google Scholar

Alvarez, J.E. ‘What Are International Judges for? The Main Functions of International Adjudication’, in Alter, K., Romano, C. and Shany, Y. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook on International Adjudication (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 158–176.Google Scholar

Ambroise, C. and Capitant, H. Cours élémentaire de droit civil français, vol. I (Paris: Librairie Dalloz, 1931).Google Scholar

Ancel, M. ‘Comment aborder le droit comparé (A propos d’une nouvelle “Introduction au droit comparé”)’, in Études offertes à René Rodière (Paris: Dalloz, 1981).Google Scholar

Anghie, A. Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Austin, J. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined [1832] (Rumble, Wilfred E., ed.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Baetens, F. (ed.). Investment Law Within International Law: Integrationist Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barak, A. Proportionality Constitutional Rights and Their Limitations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Barak-Erez, D. ‘An International Community of Legislatures?’, in Bauman, R.W. and Kahana, T. (eds.), The Least Examined Branch: The Role of Legislatures in the Constitutional State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 532–546.Google Scholar

Baxi, U. ‘The Colonialist Heritage’, in Legrand, P. and Munday, R. (eds.), Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 46–75.Google Scholar

Bederman, D.J. Custom as a Source of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Bell, J. ‘Legal Research and the Distinctiveness of Comparative Law’, in Van Hoecke, M. (ed.), Methodologies of Legal Research. Which Kind of Method for What Kind of Discipline? (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011), 155–175.Google Scholar

Binder, C., Kriebaum, U., Reinisch, A. and Wittich, S. (eds.). International Investment Law for the 21st Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Bjorklund, A.K. ‘Investment Treaty Arbitral Decisions as Jurisprudence Constante’, in Picker, C., Bunn, I. and Arner, D. (eds.), International Economic Law: The State and Future of the Discipline (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008).Google Scholar

Blackaby, N. ‘Investment Arbitration and Commercial Arbitration (or the Tale of the Dolphin and the Shark)’, in Lew, J.D.M. and Mistelis, L. (eds.), Pervasive Problems in International Arbitration (The Hague/Boston/London: Kluwer Law International, 2006), 217–233.Google Scholar

Bobbio, N. ‘Analogia’, in Bobbio, N. (ed.), Contributi a un dizionario giuridico (Torino: Giappichelli, 1994), 1.Google Scholar

Bobbio, N. L’analogia nella logica del diritto (Torino: Istituto Giuridico della Regia Universitá di Torino, 1938).Google Scholar

Bobek, M. Comparative Reasoning in European Supreme Courts (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bobek, M. ‘Reasonableness in Administrative Law: A Comparative Reflection on Functional Equivalence’, in Bongiovanni, G., Sartor, G. and Valentini, C. (eds.), Reasonableness and Law (Heidelberg: Springer, 2009), 311–326.Google Scholar

Böckstiegel, K.-H. ‘Arbitration of Foreign Investment Disputes – An Introduction’, in van den Berg, A.J. (ed.), New Horizons in International Commercial Arbitration and Beyond (Kluwer Law International, 2005), 125–131.Google Scholar

Bogdan, M. Concise Introduction to Comparative Law (Amsterdam: Europa Law Publishing, 2013).Google Scholar

Bohlander, M. and Findlay, M. ‘The Use of Domestic Sources as a Basis for International Criminal Law Principles’, in Capaldo, G.Z. (ed.), The Global Community – Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence (New York: Oceana Publications, 2002), 3–26.Google Scholar

Bonnitcha, J. ‘Outline of a Normative Framework for Evaluating Interpretations of Investment Treaty Protections’, in Brown, C. and Miles, K. (eds.), Evolution in Investment Treaty Arbitration (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), 117–144.Google Scholar

Born, G.B. and Shenkman, E.G. ‘Confidentiality and Transparency in Commercial and Investor–State International Arbitration’, in Rogers, C.A. and Alford, R.P. (eds.), The Future of Investment Arbitration (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), 5–42.Google Scholar

Bothe, M. and Ress, G. ‘The Comparative Method and Public International Law’, in Butler, W.E. (ed.), International Law in Comparative Perspective (Alphen aan den Rijn: Sijthoff & Noordhoff, 1980), 49–66.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. Distinction – A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste (Nice, R., trans., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Brierly, J.L. The Law of Nations: An Introduction to the International Law of Peace, 6th ed., (Waldock, H., ed., New York: Oxford University Press, 1963).Google Scholar

Brown, C. A Common Law of International Adjudication (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Brownlie, I. Principles of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Brownlie, I. Principles of Public International Law, 6th ed., (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Bussani, M. and Mattei, U. (eds.). The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Bussani, M. and Mattei, U. (eds.). The Common Core of European Private Law – Essays on the Project (The Hague/London/New York: Kluwer Law International, 2002).Google Scholar

Butler, W., Kresin, O.V. and Shemshuchenko, I.S. Foundations of Comparative Law: Methods and Typologies (London: Wildy, Simmonds & Hill Publishing, 2011).Google Scholar

Butler, W.E. ‘Comparative Approaches to International Law’, Recueil des Cours 190 (1985).Google Scholar

Calvino, I. Le città invisibili [Torino: Einaudi, 1972] Weaver, W., transl., (London: Penguin, 1997).Google Scholar

Calvino, I. Il castello dei destini incrociati (Torino: Einaudi, 1971).Google Scholar

Cannizzaro, E. Il principio della proporzionalitá nell’ordinamento internazionale (Milano: Giuffré, 2000).Google Scholar

Cappelletti, M. and Cohen, W. Comparative Constitutional Law (Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs Merrill Co., 1979).Google Scholar

Cassese, A. International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Cassese, A International Law, 2nd ed., (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Cheng, B. General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1953).Google Scholar

Chiba, M. (ed.), Asian Indigenous Law in Interaction with Received Law (London and New York: Kegan Paul International, 1986).Google Scholar

Choudry, S. ‘Migration as a New Metaphor in Comparative Constitutional Law’, in Choudry, S. (ed.), The Migration of Constitutional Ideas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 1–25.Google Scholar

Choudry, S. (ed.), The Migration of Constitutional Ideas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Collier, J. and Lowe, V. The Settlement of Disputes in International Law: Institutions and Procedures (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Comeaux, P. and Kinsella, N. Protecting Foreign Investment under International Law (New York: Oceana Publications, 1997).Google Scholar

Constantinesco, L.J. Traité du droit comparé, vol. II, La méthode comparative (Paris: Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence, 1974).Google Scholar

Cordero Moss, G. ‘Commercial Arbitration and Investment Arbitration: Fertile Soil for False Friends?’, in Binder, C., Kriebaum, U., Reinisch, A. and Wittich, S. (eds.), International Investment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), 782–800.Google Scholar

Cotterell, R. ‘The Concept of Legal Culture’, in Nelken, David (ed.), Comparing Legal Cultures (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1997).Google Scholar

Cotterell, R. ‘Seeking Similarity, Appreciating Difference: Comparative Law and Communities’, in Harding, A. and Örücü, E. (eds.), Comparative Law in the 21st Century (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2002).Google Scholar

Cotula, L. Human Rights, Natural Resources and Investment Law in a Globalised World (London: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar

Crawford, J. ‘International Protection of Foreign Direct Investment: Between Clinical Isolation and Systematic Integration’, in Hofmann, R. and Tams, C.J. (eds.), International Investment Law and General International Law – from Clinical Isolation to Systemic Integration? (Baden/Baden: Nomos, 2011), 17–28.Google Scholar

Cross, R. Precedent in English Law, 2nd ed., (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968).Google Scholar

Cutler, C. Private Power and Global Authority – Transnational Merchant Law in the Global Political Economy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

David, R. Les grands systèmes de droit contemporains, 5th ed., (Paris: Dalloz, 1973).Google Scholar

David, R. and Jauffret-Spinosi, C. Les grands systèmes de droit contemporains, 11th ed., (Paris: Dalloz, 2002).Google Scholar

De Brabandere, E. and Gazzini, T. (eds.), International Investment Law: The Sources of Rights and Obligations (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2012).Google Scholar

De Bracton, H. Bracton on the Laws and Customs of England [1250/1259] (Thorne, S.E., ed.) vol. 2 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976).Google Scholar

De Cruz, P. Comparative Law in Changing World (Abingdon/New York: Routledge-Cavendish, 2007).Google Scholar

Del Vecchio, G. Sui principi generali del diritto (Milano: Giuffré, 1958).Google Scholar

De Schutter, O., Swinnen, J. and Wouters, J. (eds.), Foreign Direct Investment and Human Development (London: Routledge, 2012).Google Scholar

de Secondat Montesquieu, C. The Spirit of the Laws, [1748] (Cohler, A.M., Miller, B.C. and Stone, H.S., eds. and transl., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), 308–333.Google Scholar

De Sousa Santos, B. and Rodríguez-Garavito, C.A. (eds.), Law and Globalization from Below. Towards a Cosmopolitan Legality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

de Wet, E. and Vidmar, J. (eds), Hierarchy in International Law: The Place of Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Dezalay, Y. and Garth, B. Dealing in Virtue (Chicago: University of Chicago, 1996).Google Scholar

Dezalay, Y. and Garth, B.G. (eds.), Global Prescriptions: The Production, Exportation and Importation of a New Legal Orthodoxy (Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Dolzer, R. and Schreuer, C. Principles of International Investment Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Dolzer, R. and Schreuer, C. Principles of International Investment Law, 2nd ed., (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Douglas, Z. The International Law of Investment Claims (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Drahozal, C.R. and Gibson, C.S. The Iran–U.S. Claims Tribunal at 25: The Cases Everyone Needs to Know for Investor–State and International Arbitration (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Dugan, C. Rubins, N., Wallace, D., Sabahi, B. Investor–State Arbitration (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Dupuy, P.-M., Francioni, F. and Petersmann, E.-U. (eds.), Human Rights in International Investment Law and Arbitration (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Ellis, E. (ed.), The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of Europe (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1999).Google Scholar

Erlich, E. ‘Judicial Freedom of Decision: Its Principles and Objects’, in Science of Legal Method: Selected Essays by Various Authors [1917] (Bruncken, E. and Register, L.B., trans., New York: A.M. Kelley, 1969).Google Scholar

Feldbrugge, F.J.M. ‘Sociological Research Methods and Comparative Law’, in Rotondi, M. (ed.), Buts et methods du droit comparé/Aims and Methods of Comparative Law (Padua: CEDAM, 1973).Google Scholar

Feyerabend, P. Against Method, 3rd ed., (London: Verso, 1993).Google Scholar

Footer, M.E. ‘International Investment Law and Trade: The Relationship that Never Went Away’, in Baetens, F. (ed.), Investment Law within International Law: Integrationist Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), ch. 12.Google Scholar

Gadamer, H.G. Truth and Method, 2nd ed., (Weinsheimer, J. and Marshall, D.G., trans., New York: Crossroad, 2004).Google Scholar

Gardiner, R. Treaty Interpretation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Gerber, D.J. ‘Sculpting the Agenda of Comparative Law: Ernst Rabel and the Façade of Language’, in Riles, A. (ed.), Rethinking the Masters of Comparative Law (Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2001).Google Scholar

Gianformaggio, L. ‘L’analogia giuridica’, in Gianformaggio, L., Studi sulla giustificazione giuridica (Torino: Giappichelli, 1986), 131–147.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, T. ‘Written Constitutions and the Administrative State: On the Constitutional Character of Administrative Law’, in Rose-Ackerman, S. and Lindseth, P.L. (eds.), Comparative Administrative Law (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2011), 117–127.Google Scholar

Glanert, S. (ed.), Comparative Law: Engaging Translation (London: Routledge, 2014).Google Scholar

Glanert, S. ‘Method?’, in Monateri, P.G. (ed.), Methods of Comparative Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2012), 61–81.Google Scholar

Glanert, S. ‘The Challenge of Translation’, in Palmer, M. (ed.), ADR and Legal Practice in Comparative Perspective (Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press, 2013), 370–380.Google Scholar

Glenn, H.P. ‘Against Method?’, in Monateri, P.G. (ed.), Methods of Comparative Law (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2012) 177–188.Google Scholar

Glenn, H.P. ‘Com-paring’, in Örücü, E. and Nelken, D. (eds.), Comparative Law: A Handbook (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007), 91–108.Google Scholar

Glenn, H.P. Legal Traditions of the World, 3rd ed., (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Glenn, H.P. Legal Traditions of the World: Sustainable Diversity in Law, 4th ed., (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Goldman, B. ‘The Applicable Law: General Principles of Law – The Lex Mercatoria’, in Lew, J.D. (ed.), Contemporary Problems in International Arbitration (London: Centre for Commercial Law Studies, 1986), 113–125.Google Scholar

Gourgourinis, A. ‘Reviewing the Administration of Domestic Regulation in WTO and Investment Law: the International Minimum Standard as “One Standard to Rule them all?”’, in Baetens, F. (ed.), Investment Law within International Law Integrationist Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), ch. 13.Google Scholar

Graziadei, M. ‘Comparative Law as the Study of Transplants and Receptions’, in Reimann, M. and Zimmermann, R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Graziadei, M.M. ‘The Functionalist Heritage’, in Legrand, P. and Munday, R. (eds.), Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 100–127.Google Scholar

Gutteridge, H.C. Comparative Law: An Introduction to the Comparative Method of Legal Study and Research, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1949).Google Scholar

Hart, H.L.A. The Concept of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961).Google Scholar

Hirsch, M. ‘Investment Tribunals and Human Rights: Divergent Paths’, in Dupuy, P.-M., Francioni, F. and Petersmann, E.-U. (eds.), Human Rights in International Investment Law and Arbitration (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), 97–113.Google Scholar

Hirschl, R. Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism (Boston, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Hofstadter, D. ‘Analogy as the Core of Cognition’, in Gentner, D., Holyoak, K. and Kokinov, B. (eds.), The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Book, 2001), 499–538.Google Scholar

Hsu, L. ‘Applicability of WTO Law in Regional Trade Agreements: Identifying the Links’, in Bartels, L. and Ortino, F. (eds.), Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO Legal System (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), 551.Google Scholar

Husa, J. ‘Legal Families’, in Smit, J. (ed.), Elgar Encyclopaedia of Comparative Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2010), 491–504.Google Scholar

Husa, J. ‘Research Designs of Comparative Law – Methodology or Heuristics?’, in Adams, M. and Heirbaut, D. (eds.), The Method and Culture of Comparative Law (Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2014), 53–68.Google Scholar

Jackson, J. The World Trading System (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Jenks, C.W. The Common Law of Mankind (New York: Frederick A. Praeger, 1958).Google Scholar

Kahn-Freund, O. Comparative Law as an Academic Subject (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1965).Google Scholar

Kawharu, A. ‘Participation of Non-Governmental Organizations in Investment Arbitration as Amici Curiae’, in Waibel, M., Kaushal, A., Chung, K.-H.L. and Balchin, C. (eds.), The Blacklash Against Investment Arbitration: Perceptions and Reality (The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 2010), 275–295.Google Scholar

Kingsbury, B. and Schill, S. ‘Public Law Concepts to Balance Investors’ Rights with State Regulatory Actions in the Public Interest – The Concept of Proportionality’, in Schill, S. (ed.), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 75–105.Google Scholar

Kingsbury, B. and Straumann, B. (eds.), The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Koschaker, P. Europa und das römische Recht [1946], 2nd ed., (Munich/Berlin: Biederstein Verlag, 1953).Google Scholar

Kriebaum, U. and Schreuer, C. ‘The Concept of Property in Human Rights Law and International Investment Law’, in Breitenmoser, S. (ed.), Liber Amicorum Luzius Wildhaber – Human Rights Democracy and the Rule of Law (Berlin: Nomos, 2007), 743–762.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. La structure des révolutions scientifiques (Paris: Flammarion, 1972).Google Scholar

Kulick, A. Global Public Interest in International Investment Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Kurtz, J. ‘The Merits and Limits of Comparativism: National Treatment in International Investment Law and the WTO’, in Schill, S. (ed.), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 243–278.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. ‘Contemporary Theory of Metaphor’, in Ortony, A. (ed.), Metaphor and Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 202–251.Google Scholar

Lalive, P. ‘On the Neutrality of the Arbitrator and of the Place of Arbitration’, in Reymond, C. and Bucher, E. (eds.), Recueil de Travaux Suisses sur l’arbitrage international (Zürich: Schulthess, 1984), 23–33.Google Scholar

Lalive, P. ‘Sur des dimensions culturelles de l’arbitrage international’, in Makarczyk, J. and Skubiszewski, K. (eds.), Theory of International Law at the Threshold of the 21^st Century – Essays in Honour of Krzystof Skubiszewski (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1996).Google Scholar

Landau, T. ‘Reasons for Reasons: The Tribunal’s Duty in Investor–State Arbitration’, in Van den Berg, A.J. (ed.), 50 Years of the New York Convention – ICCA International Arbitration Conference ICCA Congress Series No. 14, Dublin Conference, 2008 (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2009), 187–205.Google Scholar

Larry, A. and Sherwin, E. Demystifying Legal Reasoning (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, E. (ed.), International Law – The Collected Papers of Hersch Lauterpacht, vol. I, [1970] (London: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H. Private Law Sources and Analogies of International Law: With Special Reference to International Arbitration (London and New York: Longmans, Green and Co., Ltd., 1927).Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H. ‘Some Observations on the Prohibition of Non Liquet and the Completeness of the Legal Order’, in Symbolae Verzijl présentées au Professeur J.H.W. Verzijl à l’occasion de son VXXième anniversaire (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1958), 196.Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H. The Development of International Law by the International Court (London: Stevens & Sons, 1958).Google Scholar

Leben, C. The Advancement of International Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2010).Google Scholar

Legrand, P. Le droit comparé (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1999).Google Scholar

Legrand, P. ‘What “Legal Transplants”?’, in Nelken, D. and Feest, J. (eds.), Adapting Legal Cultures (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001), 58.Google Scholar

Legrand, P. and Munday, R. Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Lemmens, K. ‘Comparative Law as an Act of Modesty: A Pragmatic and Realistic Approach to Comparative Legal Scholarship’, in Adams, M. and Bomhoff, J. (eds.), Practice and Theory in Comparative Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), 302–326.Google Scholar

Levi, E.H. An Introduction to Legal Reasoning (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1949).Google Scholar

Lew, J.D.M. Mistelis, L.A. and Kröll, S.M. (eds.), Comparative International Commercial Arbitration (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2003).Google Scholar

Lew, J.D.M. ‘The Case for the Publication of Arbitration Awards’, in Schultsz, J.C., van den Berg, A.J. (eds.), The Art of Arbitration, Essays on International Arbitration, Liber Amicorum Pieter Sanders (The Hague: Kluwer Law, 1982), 227.Google Scholar

Libeskind, D. Breaking Ground (New York: Riverhead, 2004).Google Scholar

Lloyd, G.E.R. Polarity and Analogy, Two Types of Argumentation in Early Greek Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1966).Google Scholar

Locke, J. Second Treatise of Government [1689] (Macpherson, C.B., ed.) (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing, 1980).Google Scholar

Loughlin, M. The Idea of Public Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Lowenfeld, A. International Economic Law, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Mann, H. International Investment Agreements, Business and Human Rights: Key Issues and Opportunities (Winnipeg: IISD, 2008).Google Scholar

Mann, H. ‘The Right of States to Regulate and International Investment Law: A Comment’, in UNCTAD, The Development Dimension of FDI: Policy and Rule-Making Perspectives (New York: UN, 2003), 211–223.Google Scholar

Mattei, U. Comparative Law and Economics (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1997).Google Scholar

McCrudden, C. ‘Judicial Comparativism and Human Rights’, in Örükü, E. and Nelken, D. (eds.), Comparative Law: A Handbook (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007), 371–398.Google Scholar

McLachlan, C., Shore, L. and Weiniger, M. International Investment Arbitration (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

McLaughlin Mitchell, S. and Powell, E.J. Domestic Law Goes Global (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Menski, W. Comparative Law in a Global Context, 2nd ed., (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Merryman, J.H. ‘On the Convergence (and Divergence) of the Civil Law and the Common Law’, in Cappelletti, M. (ed.), New Perspectives for a Common Law of Europe (Leyden: Sijthoff, 1978).Google Scholar

Merryman, J.H. ‘The Loneliness of the Comparative Lawyer’, in Merryman, J.H., The Loneliness of the Comparative Lawyer And Other Essays in Foreign and Comparative Law (The Hague/London/Boston: Kluwer Law International, 1999).Google Scholar

Michaels, R. ‘The Functional Method of Comparative Law’, in Reimann, M. and Zimmermann, R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), 340–380.Google Scholar

Miles, K. The Origins of International Investment Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Monateri, P.G. (ed.), Methods of Comparative Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2012).Google Scholar

Montt, S. State Liability in Investment Treaty Arbitration – Global Constitutional and Administrative Law in the BIT Generation (Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2009).Google Scholar

Muchlinski, P. Multinational Enterprises and the Law, 2nd ed., (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Muchlinski, P. ‘The Diplomatic Protection of Foreign Investors: A Tale of Judicial Caution’, in Binder, C., Kriebaum, U., Reinisch, A. and Wittich, S. (eds.), International Investment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), 341–362.Google Scholar

Muir Watt, H. ‘Globalization and Comparative Law’, in Reimann, M. and Zimmermann, R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), 583–606.Google Scholar

Newcombe, A. and Paradell, L. Law and Practice of Investment Treaties (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2009).Google Scholar

Nin, A. Solar Barque (Ann Arbour, MI: Edwards Brothers, 1958).Google Scholar

Orellana, M.A. ‘Science, Risk and Uncertainty: Public Health Measures and Investment Disciplines’, in Kahn, P. and Wälde, T.W. (eds.), New Aspects of International Investment Law (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2007), 671.Google Scholar

Örücü, E. The Enigma of Comparative Law (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2004).Google Scholar

Paparinskis, M. ‘Analogies and Other Regimes of International Law’, in Douglas, Z., Pauwelyn, J. and Viñuales, J.E. (eds.), The Foundations of International Investment Law: Bringing Theory into Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Paparinskis, M. ‘Sources of Law and Arbitral Interpretations of Pari Materia Investment Protection Rules’, in Fauchald, O.K. and Nollkamper, A. (eds.), The Practice of International and National Courts and (De-) Fragmentation of International Law (Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2012).Google Scholar

Parra, A. History of ICSID (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Paulsson, J. Denial of Justice in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Paulsson, J. ‘Avoiding Unintended Consequences’, in Sauvant, K. and Chiswick-Patterson, M. (eds.), Appeals Mechanism in International Investment Disputes (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), 241.Google Scholar

Paulsson, J. ‘International Arbitration and the Generation of Legal Norms: Treaty Arbitration and International Law’, in Van den Berg, A.J. (ed.), International Arbitration 2006: Back to Basics? ICCA Congress Series No. 13 (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2007), 879–889.Google Scholar

Perry, A.J. Legal Systems as Determinant of Foreign Direct Investment: Lessons from Sri Lanka (London: Kluwer Law, 2001).Google Scholar

Petersmann, E.-U. ‘Introduction and Summary: “Administration of Justice” in International Investment Law and Adjudication?’, in Dupuy, P.M., Francioni, F. and Petersmann, E.-U. (eds.), Human Rights in International Investment Law and Arbitration (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), 3–43.Google Scholar

Peterson, L.E. The Global Governance of Foreign Direct Investment: Madly Off in All Directions (Geneva: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung Publisher, 2005).Google Scholar

Picciotto, S. Regulating Global Corporate Capitalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Picker, C. ‘International Investment Law: Some Legal Cultural Insights’, in Trakman, L. and Ranieri, N. (eds.), Regionalism in International Investment Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), 27–58.Google Scholar

Pirandello, L. Sei personaggi in cerca d’autore [1921], 14th ed., (Milan: Mondadori, 2001).Google Scholar

Pirker, B. Proportionality Analysis and Models of Judicial Review (Groningen: Europa Law Publishing, 2013).Google Scholar

Pizzorusso, A. Sistemi Giuridici Comparati, 2d ed., (Milano: Giuffré, 1998).Google Scholar

Porat, I. ‘Some Critical Thoughts on Proportionality’, in Bongiovanni, G., Sartor, G. and Valentini, C. (eds.), Reasonableness and Law (Heidelberg: Springer, 2009), 243–250.Google Scholar

Posner, R.A. The Problems of Jurisprudence (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Posner, R.A. Overcoming Law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Postema, G.J. ‘A Similibus ad Similia – Analogical Thinking in Law’, in Edlin, D.E. (ed.), Common Law Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), 102–133.Google Scholar

Prott, L.V. The Latent Power of Culture and the International Judge (Abingdon: Professional Books Ltd., 1979).Google Scholar

Puvimanasinghe, S.F. Foreign Investment, Human Rights and the Environment (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2007).Google Scholar

Raimondo, F. General Principles of Law in the Decisions of International Criminal Courts and Tribunals (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Raimondo, F. ‘Les principes généraux de droit dans la jurisprudence des Tribunaux ad hoc: une approche functionelle’, in Delmas-Marty, M. and Fronza, E. (eds.), Les sources du droit international penal: l’expérience des tribunaux pénaux internationaux et le statut de la Cour pénale internationale (Paris: Societé de législation comparée, 2004), 79.Google Scholar

Rajagopal, B. International Law from Below – Development, Social Movements and Third World Resistance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Reimann, M. ‘Comparative Law and Neighbouring Disciplines’, in Bussani, M. and Mattei, U. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), 13–34.Google Scholar

Reimann, M. and Zimmerman, R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Reiner, C. and Schreuer, C. ‘Human Rights and International Investment Arbitration’, in Dupuy, P.-M., Francioni, F. and Petersmann, E.-U. (eds.), Human Rights in International Investment Law and Arbitration (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), 82–96.Google Scholar

Reinisch, A. Standards of Investment Protection (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Reisman, W.M. ‘Investment and Human Rights Tribunals as Courts of Last Appeal in International Commercial Arbitration’, in Levy, L. and Derains, Y. (eds.), Liber Amicorum en honneur de Serge Lazareff (Paris: Pedone, 2011), 521.Google Scholar

Riles, A. ‘Comparative Law and Socio-Legal Studies’, in Reimann, M. and Zimmermann, R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), 811.Google Scholar

Roberts, A. ‘Subsequent Agreements and Practice: The Battle over Interpretive Power’, in Nolte, G. (ed.), Treaties and Subsequent Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), chapter 8.Google Scholar

Rodière, R. Introduction au droit comparé (Paris: Dalloz, 1979).Google Scholar

Rosen, L. Law as Culture: An Invitation (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006), 199–200.Google Scholar

Ross Perry, R. Common Law Pleading: Its History and Principles (Boston, MA: Little Brown, 1897).Google Scholar

Sacco, R. La comparaison juridique au service de la connaissance du droit (Paris: Economica, 1991).Google Scholar

Sadurski, W. ‘Reasonableness and Value Pluralism in Law and Politics’, in Bongiovanni, G., Sartor, G. and Valentini, C. (eds.), Reasonableness and Law (Heidelberg: Springer, 2009), 129.Google Scholar

Salacuse, J.W. The Law of Investment Treaties (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Saleilles, R. ‘Conception et Objet de la Science Juridique du Droit Comparé’, in Procès-Verbaux des Séances et Documents du Congrès International de Droit Comparé 1900, vol. I, (Paris: LGDJ 1905–1907), 173.Google Scholar

Scelle, G. ‘Essai sur les sources formelles du droit international’, in Recueil d’Etudes sur les sources du droit en l’honneur de François Gény, vol. III (Paris: Sirey, 1934), 400–430.Google Scholar

Schill, S. ‘General Principles of Law and International Investment Law’, in Gazzini, T. and de Brabandere, E. (eds.), International Investment Law – The Sources of Rights and Obligations (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2012), 133–181.Google Scholar

Schill, S. ‘International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law: An Introduction’, in Schill, S. (ed.), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 3–38.Google Scholar

Schill, S. (ed.), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Schill, S.W. The Multilateralization of International Investment Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Schlesinger, R.B. ‘The Common Core of Legal Systems – An Emerging Subject of Comparative Study’, in Nadelmann, K.H., von Mehren, A.T. and Hazard, J.N. (eds.), Twentieth Century Comparative and Conflicts Law – Legal Essays in Honour of Hessel E. Yntema (Leiden: A. W. Sijthoff, 1961).Google Scholar

Schneiderman, D. Constitutionalizing Economic Globalization: Investment Rules and Democracy’s Premise (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Schreuer, C. The ICSID Convention: A Commentary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Schreuer, C. and Kriebaum, U. ‘The Concept of Property in Human Rights Law and International Investment Law’, in Breitenmoser, S., Ehrenzeller, B., Sassoli, M., Stoffel, W. and Pfeifer, B. Wagner (eds.), Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law: Liber Amicorum Luzius Wildhaber (Baden/Baden: Dike, 2007).Google Scholar

Schreuer, C. and Weiniger, M. ‘A Doctrine of Precedent?’, in Muchlinski, P., Ortino, F. and Schreuer, C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), 1191–1196.Google Scholar

Schwarz-Liebermann von Wahlendorf, H.A. Droit comparé. Théorie générale et principes (Paris: Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence, 1978).Google Scholar

Scobbie, I. ‘Wicked Heresies or Legitimate Perspectives? Theory and International Law’, in Evans, M. (ed.), International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 58–92.Google Scholar

Sen, A. The Idea of Justice (Boston, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Shan, W., Simons, P. and Singh, D. (eds.), Redefining Sovereignty in International Economic Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008).Google Scholar

Siems, M.M. ‘The Curious Case of Overfitting Legal Transplants’, in Adams, M. and Heirbaut, D. (eds.), The Method and Culture of Comparative Law: Essays in Honour of Mark Van Hoecke (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014), 133–145.Google Scholar

Siltala, R. A Theory of Precedent – From Analytical Positivism to a Post-Analytical Philosophy of Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2000).Google Scholar

Simma, B. and Kill, T. ‘Harmonizing Investment Protection and International Human Rights: First Steps Towards a Methodology’, in Binder, C., Kriebaum, U., Reinisch, A., Wittich, S. (eds.), International Investment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), 678–707.Google Scholar

Sinclair, I. The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Slaughter, A. A New World Order (Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Smith, A. Lectures on Jurisprudence [1762–1763], Meek, R.L. et al. eds., (Oxford: Oxford University Clarendon Press, 1978).Google Scholar

Smits, J. Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, 2nd ed., (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2012).Google Scholar

Sornarajah, M. ‘A Coming Crisis: Expansionary Trends in Investment Treaty Arbitration’, in Sauvant, K.P. (ed.), Appeals Mechanism in International Investment Disputes Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Sornarajah, M. ‘Right to Regulate and Safeguards’, in UNCTAD, The Development Dimension of FDI: Policy and Rule Making Perspectives (New York/Geneva: UN, 2003) 205–210.Google Scholar

Sornarajah, M. The International Law on Foreign Investment, 3rd ed., (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Stern, B. ‘In Search of the Frontiers of Indirect Expropriation’, in Rovine, A. (ed.), Contemporary Issues in International Arbitration and Mediation (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008), 29–51.Google Scholar

Stone Sweet, A. and Grisel, F. ‘The Evolution of International Arbitration: Delegation, Judicialization, Governance’, in Mattli, W. and Dietz, T. (eds.), International Arbitration and Global Governance: Contending Theories and Evidence (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 22–46.Google Scholar

Stone Sweet, A. and Grisel, F. ‘Transnational Investment Arbitration: From Delegation to Constitutionalization?’, in Dupuy, P.M., Francioni, F. and Petersmann, E.U. (eds.), Human Rights in International Investment Law and Arbitration (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), 118–136.Google Scholar

Strathern, M. Partial Connections (California: Alta Mira Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Subedi, S. International Investment Law: Reconciling Policy and Principle (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008).Google Scholar

Swanson, G. ‘Frameworks for Comparative Research: Structural Anthropology and the Theory of Action’, in Vallier, I. (ed.), Comparative Methods in Sociology (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1971), 141–202.Google Scholar

Swift, J. Travels into Several Remote Nations of the World. In Four Parts. By Lemuel Gulliver, First a Surgeon, and then a Captain of Several Ships, [Gulliver’s Travels] (London: Benjamin Motte, 1726).Google Scholar

Tams, C. ‘The Sources of International Investment Law’, in Gazzini, T. and De Brabandere, E. (eds.), International Investment Law: The Sources of Rights and Obligations (Leiden: Brill, 2012), 319–332.Google Scholar

Teitel, R. Humanity’s Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Teubner, G. ‘Global Bukowina: Legal Pluralism in the World Society’, in Teubner, G. (ed.), Global Law Without a State (Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing, 1997), 3–30.Google Scholar

Tienhaara, K. The Expropriation of Environmental Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Tomuschat, C. ‘The European Court of Human Rights and Investment Protection’, in Binder, C., Kriebaum, U., Reinisch, A., Wittich, S. (eds.), International Investment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), 636–656.Google Scholar

Trachtman, J. The Economic Structure of International Law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Treves, T., Seatzu, F. and Trevisanut, S. (eds.), Foreign Investment, International Law and Common Concerns (London: Routledge, 2014).Google Scholar

Trubek, D. and Santos, A. (eds.), The New Law and Economic Development (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Twining, W. General Jurisprudence: Understanding Law from a Global Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Vadi, V. Public Health in International Investment Law and Arbitration (Abingdon: Routledge, 2012).Google Scholar

Valcke, C. ‘Reflections on Comparative Law Methodology – Getting Inside Contract Law’, in Adams, M. and Bomhoff, J. (eds.), Practice and Theory in Comparative Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Van den Bossche, P. and Zdouc, W. The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization, 3rd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Van Erp, S. ‘Comparative Property Law’, in Reimann, M. and Zimmermann, R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Van Harten, G. Investment Treaty Arbitration and Public Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Van Hoecke, M. ‘Deep Level Comparative Law’, in Van Hoecke, M. (ed.), Epistemology and Methodology of Comparative Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004), 165–174.Google Scholar

Van Hoecke, M. (ed.) Epistemology and Methodology of Comparative Law (Oxford/Portland: Hart Publishing, 2004).Google Scholar

Velluzzi, V. ‘Osservazioni sull’analogia giuridica’, in Velluzzi, V., Tra Teoria e dogmatica (Pisa: Edizioni ETS, 2012), 65–84.Google Scholar

von Bogdandy, A., Dann, P. and Goldmann, M. ‘Developing the Publicness of Public International Law: Towards a Legal Framework for Global Governance Activities’, in von Bogdandy, A., Wolfrum, R., von Bernstorff, J., Dann, P., Goldmann, M. (eds.), The Exercise of Public Authority by International Institutions (Heidelberg: Springer, 2009), 3–32.Google Scholar

von Savigny, F.C. On the Vocation of Our Age for Legislation and Jurisprudence [Hayward, Abraham, trans., London: Littlewood and Co., 1828] (Birmingham, AL: Legal Classics Library, 1986).Google Scholar

Waibel, M., Kaushal, A., Chung, K.-H.L. and Balchin, C. ‘The Blacklash against Investment Arbitration: Perceptions and Reality’, in Waibel, M., Kaushal, A., Chung, K.-H.L. and Balchin, C. (eds.), The Blacklash against Investment Arbitration: Perceptions and Reality (The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 2010).Google Scholar

Waibel, M., Kaushal, A., Chung, K.-H. and Balchin, C. (eds.), The Backlash Against Investment Arbitration (The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 2010).Google Scholar

Watson, A. Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law (Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, 1974).Google Scholar

Watson, A. Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law, 2nd ed., (Athens; London: University of Georgia Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Watson, A. The Law of the Ancient Romans (Dallas: Southern Methodist University, 1970).Google Scholar

Watt, G. ‘Comparison as Deep Appreciation’, in Monateri, P.G. (ed.), Methods of Comparative Law (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2012), 82–99.Google Scholar

Weber, M. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism [Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus (Tübingen, 1920)], 3rd ed., (Kalberg, S. ed. and trans., Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Publishing Co., 2002).Google Scholar

Weinreb, L.L. Legal Reason: The Use of Analogy in Legal Argument (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Wigmore, J.H. A Kaleidoscope of Justice (Washington, DC: Washington Law Books Co., 1941).Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. Culture and Value (Von Wright, G.H. ed., Winch, P. tranl., Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1980).Google Scholar

Zumbansen, P. ‘Transnational Comparisons: Theory and Practice of Comparative Law as a Critique of Global Governance’, in Adams, M. and Bomhoff, J. (eds.), Practice and Theory in Comparative Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), 186–211.Google Scholar

Zweigert, K. ‘Méthodologie du droit comparé’, in Mélanges J. Maury (Paris: Dalloz-Sirey, 1960), 579–596.Google Scholar

Zweigert, K. and Kötz, H. Introduction to Comparative Law, 3rd ed., Weir, T. transl. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Aalberts, T.A. ‘The Politics of International Law and the Perils and Promises of Interdisciplinarity’, Leiden Journal of International Law 26 (2013), 503–508.Google Scholar

Akinsanya, A. ‘International Protection of Foreign Direct Investments in the Third World’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 36 (1987), 58–75.Google Scholar

Allott, P. ‘Language, Method and the Nature of International Law’, British Yearbook of International Law 45 (1971), 79–135.Google Scholar

Alvarez, J.E. ‘A BIT on Custom’, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics (2010), 17–80.Google Scholar

Alvarez, J.E. ‘Contemporary Foreign Investment Law: an Empire of Law or the Law of Empire?’, Alabama Law Review 60 (2009), 943–974.Google Scholar

Alvarez, J.E. ‘Contemporary International Law: An “Empire of Law” or “the Law of Empire”?’, American University International Law Review 24 (2008–2009), 811–842.Google Scholar

Alvarez, J.E. ‘The Return of the State’, Minnesota Journal of International Law 20 (2011), 221–264.Google Scholar

Ambrus, M. ‘Comparative Law Method in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights in the Light of the Rule of Law’, Erasmus Law Review 2 (2009), 353–371.Google Scholar

Anderson, J.L. ‘Comparative Perspectives on Property Rights’, Journal of Legal Education 56 (2006), 1–12.Google Scholar

Audit, M. ‘The Channel Tunnel Group Ltd and France-Manche SA v. United Kingdom and France’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 57 (2008), 724–732.Google Scholar

Banakar, R. ‘Power, Culture and Method in Comparative Law’, International Journal of Law in Context 5 (2009), 69–85.Google Scholar

Barak-Erez, D. ‘The Institutional Aspects of Comparative Law’, Columbia Journal of European Law 15 (2008–2009), 477–492.Google Scholar

Barnes, W.R. ‘Contemplating a Civil Law Paradigm for a Future International Commercial Code’, Louisiana Law Review 65 (2004–2005), 677–774.Google Scholar

Bassiouni, M.C. ‘A Functional Approach to General Principles of International Law’, Michigan Journal of International Law 11 (1990), 768–818.Google Scholar

Bastid Burdeau, G. ‘Nouvelles perspectives pour l’arbitrage dans le contentieux economique intéressant l’Etat’, Revue de l’Arbitrage 1 (1995), 3–38.Google Scholar

Baudenbacher, C. ‘Judicial Globalization: New Development or Old Wine in New Bottles?’, Texas International Law Journal 38 (2003), 505–526.Google Scholar

Bean, V. and Beauvais, J.C. ‘The Global Fifth Amendment? NAFTA’s Investment Protection and the Misguided Quest for an International Regulatory Takings Doctrine’, New York University Law Review 78 (2003), 30–143.Google Scholar

Becker, L.C. ‘Analogy in Legal Reasoning’, Ethics 83 (1973), 248–255.Google Scholar

Bénassy-Quéré, A., Coupet, M. and Mayer, T. ‘Institutional Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment’, World Economy 30 (2007), 764–782.Google Scholar

Ben Hamida, W. ‘Investment Arbitration and Human Rights’, Transnational Dispute Management 5 (2007), 1–14.Google Scholar

Benvenisti, E. ‘Reclaiming Democracy: The Strategic Uses of Foreign and International Law by National Courts’, American Journal of International Law 102 (2008), 241–274.Google Scholar

Berman, P.S. ‘A Pluralist Approach to International Law’, Yale Journal of International Law 32 (2007), 301–329.Google Scholar

Berman, F. ‘Treaty Interpretation in a Judicial Context’, Yale Journal of International Law 29 (2004), 315–322.Google Scholar

Bermann, G.A., Glenn, P., Lane Scheppele, K., Shalakany, A., Snyder, D.V. and Zoller, E. ‘Comparative Law: Problems and Prospects’, American University International Law Review 26 (2010–2011), 935–968.Google Scholar

Bhagwati, J. ‘Why Multinationals Help Reduce Poverty’, World Economy 30 (2007), 211–228.Google Scholar

Bjorklund, A. ‘The Emerging Civilization of Investment Arbitration’, Penn State Law Review 113 (2009), 1269–1300.Google Scholar

Böckstiegel, K.-H. ‘Commercial and Investment Arbitration: How Different Are They Today?’, Arbitration International 28 (2012), 577–590.Google Scholar

Böckstiegel, K.-H. ‘Enterprise v. State: The New David and Goliath? – The Clayton Utz Lecture’, Arbitration International 23 (2007), 93–104.Google Scholar

Borsellino, P. ‘L’analogia nella logica del diritto: un contributo di Norberto Bobbio alla metodologia giuridica’, Rivista internazionale di filosofia del diritto LXII (1985), 3–39.Google Scholar

Boughey, J. ‘Administrative Law: The Next Frontier for Comparative Law’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 62 (2013), 55–95.Google Scholar

Braun, A. ‘Burying the Living? The Citation of Legal Writings in English Courts’, American Journal of Comparative Law 58 (2010), 27–52.Google Scholar

Brewer, T.L. and Young, S. ‘Investment Issues at the WTO: The Architecture of Rules and the Settlement of Disputes’, Journal of International Economic Law (1998), 457–470.Google Scholar

Brower, C.N. ‘W(h)ither International Commercial Arbitration?’, Arbitration International 24 (2008), 181–198.Google Scholar

Brower, C.N. and Schill, S.W. ‘Is Arbitration a Threat or a Boon to the Legitimacy of International Investment Law?’, Chicago Journal of International Law 9 (2008 –2009), 471–498.Google Scholar

Brown, C. ‘The Use of Precedents of Other International Courts and Tribunals in Investment Treaty Arbitration’, Transnational Dispute Management 5 (2008), 1–10.Google Scholar

Brown, J., Kudat, A. and McGeeney, K. ‘Improving Legislation through Social Analysis: a Case Study in Methodology from the Water Sector in Uzbekistan’, Sustainable Development Law and Policy 5 (2005), 49–57.Google Scholar

Burke-White, W.W. ‘International Legal Pluralism’, Michigan Journal of International Law 25 (2004), 963–980.Google Scholar

Burke-White, W.W. and Von Staden, A. ‘Investment Protection in Extraordinary Times: The Interpretation and Application of Non-Precluded Measures Provisions in Bilateral Investment Treaties’, Virginia Journal of International Law 48 (2007), 307–411.Google Scholar

Burke-White, W.W. and Von Staden, A. ‘Private Litigation in a Public Private Sphere: The Standard of Review in Investor–State Arbitrations’, Yale Journal of International Law 35 (2010), 283–346.Google Scholar

Cappelletti, M. ‘Repudiating Montesquieu? The Expansion and Legitimacy of “Constitutional Justice”’, Catholic University Law Review 35 (1985), 1–32.Google Scholar

Cassese, S. ‘Beyond Legal Comparison’, Annuario di diritto comparato e di studi legislativi (2012), 387–395.Google Scholar

Chalamish, E. ‘The Future of BITs: A De Facto Multilateral Agreement?’, Brooklyn Journal of International Law 34 (2009), 303–354.Google Scholar

Chen-Wishart, M. ‘Legal Transplant and Undue Influence: Lost in Translation or a Working Understanding?’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 62 (2013), 1–30.Google Scholar

Chimni, B.S. ‘Co-option and Resistance: Two Faces of Global Administrative Law’, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 37 (2005), 799–827.Google Scholar

Choudry, S. ‘Globalization in Search of a Justification: Toward a Theory of Comparative Constitutional Interpretation’, Indiana Law Journal 74 (1999), 819–892.Google Scholar

Clark, M. ‘Venezuela’s Withdrawal from the ICSID Convention’, Association for International Arbitration Bulletin, October 2012, 2.Google Scholar

Cohen, M. ‘Reason-Giving in Court Practice: Decision-Makers at the Crossroads’, Columbia Journal of European Law 14 (2007–2008), 257–276.Google Scholar

Cohen-Eliya, M. and Porat, I. ‘Proportionality and the Culture of Justification’, American Journal of Comparative Law 59 (2011), 463–490.Google Scholar

Commission, J. ‘Precedent in Investment Treaty Arbitration: A Citation Analysis of a Developing Jurisprudence’, Journal of International Arbitration 24 (2007), 129–158.Google Scholar

Cuniberti, G. ‘Parallel Litigation and Foreign Investment Dispute Settlement’, ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 21 (2006), 381–406.Google Scholar

Dattu, R. ‘A Journey from Havana to Paris: The Fifty Year Quest for the Elusive Multilateral Agreement on Investment’, Fordham International Law Journal 24 (2000–2001), 275–316.Google Scholar

David, R. ‘Le droit comparé enseignement de culture générale’, Revue internationale de droit comparé 2 (1950), 682–685.Google Scholar

Davis, F. ‘Comparative Law Contributions to the International Legal Order: Common Core Research’, George Washington Law Review 37 (1969), 615–633.Google Scholar

De Burca, G., Keohane, R.O. and Sabel, C. ‘New Modes of Pluralist Global Governance’, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 45 (2013), 723–786.Google Scholar

Delaume, G. ‘The Pyramids Stand – The Pharaohs can Rest in Peace’, ICSID Review–Foreign Investment Law Journal 8 (1993), 231–263.Google Scholar

Delmas-Marty, M. ‘Comparative Law and International Law: Methods for Ordering Pluralism’, University of Tokyo Journal of Law and Politics (2006), 43–59.Google Scholar

Delmas-Marty, M. ‘The Contribution of Comparative Law to a Pluralist Conception of International Criminal Law’, Journal of International Criminal Justice 1 (2003), 13–25.Google Scholar

Del Vecchio, G. ‘L’Unité de l’Esprit Humain Comme Base de la Comparaison Juridique’, Revue Internationale de Droit Comparé 2 (1950), 686–691.Google Scholar

Demleitner, N. ‘Combating Legal Ethnocentrism: Comparative Law Sets Boundaries’, Arizona State Law Journal 31 (1999), 737–762.Google Scholar

Dibadj, R. ‘Panglossian Transnationalism’, Stanford Journal of International Law 44 (2008), 253–299.Google Scholar

DiMascio, N. and Pauwelyn, J. ‘Nondiscrimination in Trade and Investment Treaties: Worlds Apart or Two Sides of the Same Coin?’, American Journal of International Law 102 (2008), 48–89.Google Scholar

Dookhun, S. ‘Q&A with Professor Pierre Lalive’, Global Arbitration Review 3 (2008), 5.Google Scholar

Douglas, Z. ‘The Hybrid Foundations of Investment Treaty Arbitration’, The British Yearbook of International Law 74 (2003), 151–289.Google Scholar

Douglas, Z. ‘Can a Doctrine of Precedent be Justified in Investment Treaty Arbitration?’, ICSID Review–Foreign Investment Law Journal 25 (2010), 104–110.Google Scholar

Dworkin, R. ‘In Praise of Theory’, Arizona State Law Journal 29 (1997), 353–376.Google Scholar

Eeckhout, P. ‘The Scales of Trade – Reflections on the Growth and Functions of the WTO Adjudicative Branch’, Journal of International Economic Law 13 (2010), 3–26.Google Scholar

Ehlermann, C.D. ‘Six Years on the Bench of the World Trade Court – Some Personal Experiences as Member of the Appellate Body of the WTO’, Journal of World Trade 36 (2002), 605–639.Google Scholar

Ellickson, R.C. ‘Property in Land’, Yale Law Journal 102 (1993), 1315–1400.Google Scholar

Ellis, J. ‘General Principles and Comparative Law’, European Journal of International Law 22 (2011), 949–971.Google Scholar

Esposito, P. and Martire, J. ‘Arbitrating in a World of Communicative Reason’, Arbitration International 28 (2012), 325–341.Google Scholar

Fletcher, G.P. ‘Comparative Law as a Subversive Discipline’, American Journal of Comparative Law 46 (1998), 683–700.Google Scholar

Fontoura Costa, J.A. ‘Comparing WTO Panelists and ICSID Arbitrators: The Creation of International Legal Fields’, Oñati Socio-Legal Series 1(4) (2011), 1–24.Google Scholar

Fortier, L.Y. and Drymer, S.L. ‘Indirect Expropriation in the Law of International Investment: I Know It When I See It, or Caveat Investor’, ICSID Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal 19 (2004), 293–327.Google Scholar

Francioni, F. ‘Access to Justice, Denial of Justice, and International Investment Law’, European Journal of International Law 20 (2009), 729–747.Google Scholar

Franck, S.D. ‘Development and Outcomes of Investment Treaty Arbitration’, Harvard International Law Journal 50 (2009), 435–489.Google Scholar

Franck, S.D. ‘The Legitimacy Crisis in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Privatizing Public International Law Through Inconsistent Decisions’, Fordham Law Review 73 (2005), 1521–1625.Google Scholar

Frankenberg, G. ‘Critical Comparisons: Rethinking Comparative Law’, Harvard International Law Journal 26 (1985), 411–456.Google Scholar

Freeman, E. ‘Regulatory Expropriation Under NAFTA Chapter 11: Some Lessons From the European Court of Human Rights’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 42 (2003–2004), 177–215.Google Scholar

Freeman Jalet, F.T. ‘The Quest for the General Principles of Law Recognized by Civilized Nations’, UCLA Law Review 10 (1963), 1041–1086.Google Scholar

French, D. ‘Treaty Interpretation and the Incorporation of Extraneous Legal Rules’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 55 (2006), 281–314.Google Scholar

Friedmann, W. ‘The Uses of “General Principles” in the Development of International Law’, American Journal of International Law 57 (1963), 279–280.Google Scholar

Fry, J.D. ‘International Human Rights Law in Investment Arbitration: Evidence of International Law’s Unity’, Duke Journal Comparative and International Law 18 (2007), 77–150.Google Scholar

Gaillard, E. ‘Use of General Principles of International Law in International Long-Term Contracts’, International Business Lawyer (1999), 214–224.Google Scholar

Gaines, S. ‘The WTO’s Reading of the GATT Article XX Chapeau: A Disguised Restriction on Environmental Measures’, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 22 (2001), 739–862.Google Scholar

Gaubatz, K.T. and MacArthur, M. ‘How International is International Law?’, Michigan Journal of International Law 22 (2001), 239–282.Google Scholar

Gerber, D. ‘System Dynamics: Toward a Language of Comparative Law?’, American Journal of Comparative Law 46 (1998), 719–732.Google Scholar

Giliker, P. ‘Book Review–The Enigma of Comparative Law: Variations on a Theme for the Twenty-first Century and Methodology of Comparative Law’ by Örücü, E. (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2004), International and Comparative Law Quarterly 55 (2006), 243–246.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, T. ‘The Culture of Arbitration’, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 36 (2003), 1335–1346.Google Scholar

Glenn, P. ‘Comparative Law: Problems and Prospects’, American University International Law Review 26 (2010–2011), 935–968.Google Scholar

Glenn, H.P. ‘Persuasive Authority’, McGill Law Journal 32 (1987), 261–298.Google Scholar

Goldhaber, M. ‘Wanted: A World Investment Court’, Transnational Dispute Management 3 (2004), 1–5.Google Scholar

González Jácome, , ‘El uso del derecho comparado como forma de escape de la subordinación colonial’, International Law: Revista Colombiana de Derecho Internacional 7 (2006), 295–338.Google Scholar

Gordley, J. ‘Is Comparative Law a Distinct Discipline?’, The American Journal of Comparative Law 46 (1998), 607–615.Google Scholar

Green, L.C. ‘Comparative Law as a “Source” of International Law’, Tulane Law Review 42 (1967–1968), 52–66.Google Scholar

Grosswald Curran, V. ‘Comparative Law and the Legal Origins Thesis’, American Journal of Comparative Law 57 (2009), 863–876.Google Scholar

Grosswald Curran, V. ‘Cultural Immersion, Difference and Categories in U.S. Comparative Law’, American Journal of Comparative Law 46 (1998), 43–92.Google Scholar

Grosswald Curran, V. ‘Fear of Formalism: Indications from the Fascist Period in France and Germany of Judicial Methodology’s Impact on Substantive Law’, Cornell International Law Journal 35 (2001–2002), 101–188.Google Scholar

Grosswald Curran, V. ‘Romantic Common Law, Enlightened Civil Law: Legal Uniformity and the Homogenization of the European Union’, Columbia Journal European Law 7 (2001), 63–126.Google Scholar

Gutteridge, H.C. ‘Comparative Law and the Law of Nations’, British Yearbook of International Law 21 (1944), 1–10.Google Scholar

Guzman, A. ‘Explaining the Popularity of Bilateral Investment Treaties: Why LDCs Sign Treaties that Hurt Them’, Virginia Journal of Transnational Law 38 (1997), 639–688.Google Scholar

Haas, P. ‘Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination’, International Organization 46 (1992), 1–35.Google Scholar

Hallward-Driemeier, M. ‘Do Bilateral Investment Treaties Attract Foreign Direct Investment? Only a Bit … And They Could Bite’, Policy Research Working Paper No 3121 (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2003).Google Scholar

Harding, S.K. ‘Comparative Reasoning and Judicial Review’, Yale Journal of International Law 28 (2003), 409–464.Google Scholar

Harlow, C. ‘Global Administrative Law: The Quest for Principles and Values’, European Journal of International Law 17 (2006), 187–214.Google Scholar

Hazard, J.N. ‘Briefer Notice’, American Journal of International Law 63 (1969), 179–180.Google Scholar

Helfer, L.R. ‘Constitutional Analogies in the International Legal System’, Loyola Los Angeles Law Review 37 (2003–2004), 193–237.Google Scholar

Hey, E. and Mak, E. ‘Introduction: The Possibilities of Comparative Law Method for Research on the Rule of Law in a Global Context’, Erasmus Law Review 2 (2009), 287–288.Google Scholar

Higgins, R. ‘Policy Considerations and the International Judicial Process’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 17 (1968), 58–84.Google Scholar

Hirschl, R. ‘The Question of Case Selection in Comparative Constitutional Law’, American Journal of Comparative Law 53 (2005), 125–156.Google Scholar

Holyoak, K.J. and Thagard, P. ‘The Analogical Mind’, American Psychologist 52 (1997), 35–44.Google Scholar

Horwitz, M.J. ‘The History of the Public/Private Distinction’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review 130 (1982), 1423–1428.Google Scholar

Howse, R. and Chalamish, E. ‘The Use and Abuse of WTO Law in Investor–State Arbitration: A Reply to Jürgen Kurtz’, European Journal of International Law 20 (2009), 1087–1094.Google Scholar

Hsu, L. ‘International Investment Disputes: Ideological Fault Lines and an Evolving Zeitgeist’, Journal of World Investment and Trade 12 (2011), 827–853.Google Scholar

Husa, J. ‘Methodology of Comparative Law Today: From Paradoxes to Flexibility?’, Revue internationale de droit comparé 57 (2006), 1095–1117.Google Scholar

Husa, J. ‘Classification of Legal Families Today – Is it Time for Memorial Hymn?’, Revue International de Droit Comparé 56 (2004), 11–38.Google Scholar

Husa, J. ‘About the Methodology of Comparative Law – Some Comments Concerning the Wonderland …’, Maastricht Faculty of Law Working Papers 5 (2007), 1–18.Google Scholar

Izorche, M.-L. ‘Propositions méthodologiques pour la comparaison’, Revue internationale de droit comparé 53 (2001), 289–325.Google Scholar

Jackson, V. ‘Constitutional Comparisons: Convergence, Resistance, Engagement’, Harvard Law Review 119 (2005), 109–129.Google Scholar

Jaluzot, B ‘Méthodologie du droit comparé – Bilan et prospective’, Revue internationale de droit comparé 57 (2005), 29–48.Google Scholar

Jamin, C. ‘Saleilles and Lambert’s Old Dream Revisited’, American Journal of Comparative Law 50 (2002), 701–718.Google Scholar

Jans, J. ‘Proportionality Revisited’, Legal Issues of Economic Integration 27 (2000), 239.Google Scholar

Jennings, , ‘The Judiciary, International and National, and the Development of International Law’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 45 (1996), 1–12.Google Scholar

Jianlong, Y. ‘Arbitrators: Private Judges, Service Providers or Both? CIETAC’s Perspective’, Stockholm International Arbitration Review 1 (2007), 1–9.Google Scholar

Johnston, A.M. and Trebilcock, M.J. ‘Fragmentation in International Trade Law: Insights from the Global Investment Regime’, World Trade Review 12 (2013), 621–652.Google Scholar

Jouannet, E. ‘Universalism and Imperialism: The True False Paradox of International Law?’ European Journal of International Law 18 (2007), 379–409.Google Scholar

Juthe, A. ‘Argument by Analogy’, Argumentation 19 (2005), 1–27.Google Scholar

Kahn-Freund, O. ‘Comparative Law as an Academic Subject’, Law Quarterly Review 82 (1966), 40–61.Google Scholar

Kahn-Freund, O. ‘On Uses and Misuses of Comparative Law’, Modern Law Review 37 (1974), 1–27.Google Scholar

Kapeliuk, D. ‘The Repeat Appointment Factor: Exploring Decision Patterns of Elite Investment Arbitrators’, Cornell Law Review 96 (2010–2011), 47–90.Google Scholar

Kaplan, N. ‘Investment Arbitration’s Influence on Practice and Procedure in Commercial Arbitration’, Asian Dispute Review (2013), 122–125.Google Scholar

Kapterian, G. ‘A Critique of the WTO Jurisprudence on Necessity’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 59 (2010), 89–127.Google Scholar

Kasirer, N. ‘Legal Education as Métissage’, Tulane Law Review 78 (2003–2004), 481–501.Google Scholar

Kaufmann-Kohler, G. ‘Arbitral Precedent: Dream, Necessity or Excuse?’, Arbitration International 23 (2007), 357–378.Google Scholar

Kaufmann-Kohler, G. ‘Globalization of Arbitral Procedure’, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 36 (2003), 1313–1334.Google Scholar

Kennedy, D. ‘New Approaches to Comparative Law: Comparativism and International Governance’, Utah Law Review 2 (1997), 545–637.Google Scholar

Kiekbaev, D. ‘Comparative Law: Method, Science or Educational Discipline?’, Electronic Journal of Comparative Law 7 (2003), 1–7.Google Scholar

Kingsbury, B. and Schill, S. ‘Investor–State Arbitration as Governance: Fair and Equitable Treatment, Proportionality and the Emerging Global Administrative Law’, New York University School of Law, Public Law & Legal Research Theory Research Paper Series, Working Paper No. 09–46 (2009), 1–56.Google Scholar

Kocbek, A. ‘Language and Culture in International Legal Communication’, Managing Global Transitions 4 (2006), 231–247.Google Scholar

Krisch, N. and Kingsbury, B. ‘Introduction: Global Governance and Global Administrative Law in the International Legal Order’, European Journal of International Law 17 (2006), 1–13.Google Scholar

Kurtz, J ‘The Use and Abuse of WTO Law in Investor–State Arbitration: Competition and Its Discontents’, European Journal of International Law 20 (2009), 749–771.Google Scholar

Lachs, M. ‘Teachings and Teaching of International Law’, Recueil des Cours de l´Académie de Droit International de la Haye 151 (1976/III), 161.Google Scholar

Lalive, P. ‘On the Reasoning of International Arbitral Awards’, Journal of International Dispute Settlement 1 (2010), 55–65.Google Scholar

Latty, F. ‘Les techniques interprétative du CIRDI’, Revue Générale de Droit International Public 115 (2011), 459–475.Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H. ‘Decisions of Municipal Courts as a Source of International Law’, British Yearbook of International Law 10 (1929), 65–95.Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H. ‘Restrictive Interpretation and the Principle of Effectiveness in the Interpretation of Treaties’, British Yearbook of International Law 26 (1949), 48–85.Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, E. ‘The Development of the Law of International Organizations by the Decision of Arbitral Tribunals’, Recueil des Courses 152 (1976), 396.Google Scholar

Leben, C. ‘La responsabilité internationale de l’Etat sur le fondement des Traités de promotion et de protection des investissements’, Annuaire Français de Droit International 50 (2004), 683–714.Google Scholar

Legrand, P. ‘European Legal Systems are not Converging’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 45 (1996), 52–81.Google Scholar

Legrand, P. ‘How to Compare Now?’, Legal Studies 16 (1996), 232–242.Google Scholar

Legrand, P. ‘On the Singularity of Law’, Harvard International Law Journal 47 (2006), 517–530.Google Scholar

Legrand, P. ‘The Impossibility of Legal Transplants’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 4 (1997), 111–124.Google Scholar

Leonhardsen, E. ‘Looking for Legitimacy: Exploring Proportionality Analysis in Investment Treaty Arbitration’, Journal of International Dispute Settlement 3 (2012), 95–136.Google Scholar

Lévesque, C. ‘Influences on the Canadian FIPA Model and the U.S. Model BIT: NAFTA Chapter 11 and Beyond’, Canadian Yearbook of International Law 44 (2006), 249–298.Google Scholar

Levine, E. ‘“Amicus Curiae” in International Investment Arbitration: The Implication of an Increase in Third-Party Participation’, Berkeley Journal of International Law 29 (2011), 200–224.Google Scholar

Lowe, V. ‘Regulation or Expropriation?’, Current Legal Problems 55 (2002), 447–466.Google Scholar

Lowenfeld, A. ‘Investment Agreements and International Law’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 42 (2003–2004), 123–130.Google Scholar

Lowenfeld, A. ‘The Party-Appointed Arbitrator in International Controversies: Some Reflections’, Texas International Law Journal 30 (1995), 59–72.Google Scholar

Mamlyuk, B.N. and Mattei, U. ‘Comparative International Law’, Brooklyn Journal of International Law 36 (2010–2011), 385–452.Google Scholar

Maniruzzaman, A.F.M. ‘State Contracts in Contemporary International Law: Monist versus Dualist Controversies’, European Journal of International Law 12 (2001), 309–328.Google Scholar

Marceau, G., Lanovoy, V. and Izaguerri Vila, A. ‘A Lighthouse in the Storm of Fragmentation’, Journal of World Trade 47 (2013), 481–574.Google Scholar

Markesinis, B. ‘Unité ou divergence: à la recherche des ressemblances dans le droit européen contemporain’, Revue de droit international et de droit comparé 53 (2001), 807–808.Google Scholar

Martinez, J.S. ‘Towards an International Judicial System’, Stanford Law Review 56 (2003), 429–530.Google Scholar

Martinez-Fraga, P.J. and Samra, H.J. ‘The Role of Precedent in Defining Res Judicata in Investor–State Arbitration’, Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business 32 (2011–2012), 419–450.Google Scholar

Mattei, U. ‘Three Patterns of Law: Taxonomy and Change in the World’s Legal Systems’, American Journal of Comparative Law 45 (1997), 5–45.Google Scholar

Maupin, J.A. ‘Public and Private in International Investment Law: An Integrated Systems Approach’, Virginia Journal of International Law 54 (2013–2014), 267–436.Google Scholar

McCrudden, C. ‘A Common Law of Human Rights? Transnational Judicial Conversations on Constitutional Rights’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 20 (2000), 499–532.Google Scholar

McCrudden, C. ‘Using Comparative Reasoning in Human Rights Adjudication: The Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights Compared’, Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 15 (2012–2013), 383–415.Google Scholar

McDougal, M.S. ‘The Comparative Study of Law for Policy Purposes: Value Clarification as an Instrument of World Order’, American Journal of Comparative Law 1 (1952), 24–57.Google Scholar

McLachlan, C. ‘The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 54 (2005), 279–320.Google Scholar

Merryman, J.H. ‘On the Convergence (and Divergence) of the Civil Law and the Common Law’, Stanford Journal of International Law 17 (1981), 357–388.Google Scholar

Miller, N. ‘An International Jurisprudence? The Operation of “Precedent” Across International Tribunals’, Leiden Journal of International Law 15 (2002), 483–526.Google Scholar

Mills, A. ‘Antinomies of Public and Private at the Foundations of International Investment Law and Arbitration’, Journal of International Economic Law 14 (2011), 469–503.Google Scholar

Momirov, A. and Naudé Fourie, A. ‘Vertical Comparative Methods: Tools for Conceptualising the International Rule of Law’, Erasmus Law Review 2 (2009), 291–308.Google Scholar

Monateri, P.G. ‘Black Gaius – A Quest for the Multicultural Origins of the “Western Legal Tradition”’, Hastings Law Journal 51 (1999–2000), 479–556.Google Scholar

Mousourakis, G. ‘How Comparative Law Can Contribute to the Development of a General Theory on Legal Evolution’, Tilburg Law Review 14 (2008), 272–297.Google Scholar

Muir Watt, H. ‘La fonction subversive du droit comparé’, Revue Internationale de Droit Comparé 52 (2000), 503–527.Google Scholar

Newcombe, A. ‘The Boundaries of Regulatory Expropriation in International Law’, ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 20 (2005), 1–57.Google Scholar

Obiora, L.A. ‘Toward an Auspicious Reconciliation of International and Comparative Analyses’, American Journal of Comparative Law 46 (1998), 669–682.Google Scholar

Olynyk, S. ‘A Balanced Approach to Distinguishing Between Legitimate Regulation and Indirect Expropriation in Investor–State Arbitration’, International Trade and Business Law Review 15 (2012), 254–296.Google Scholar

Oppenheim, L. ‘The Science of International Law: Its Task and Method’, American Journal of International Law 2 (1908), 313–356.Google Scholar

Palmer, V.V. ‘From Lerotholi to Lando: Some Examples of Comparative Law Methodology’, American Journal of Comparative Law 53 (2005), 261–290.Google Scholar

Park, W.W. ‘Private Disputes and the Public Good: Explaining Arbitration Law’, American University International Law Review 20 (2004–2005), 903–906.Google Scholar

Paulsson, J. ‘Arbitration Without Privity’, ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 10 (1995), 232–257.Google Scholar

Paulsson, J. ‘International Arbitration is not Arbitration’, Stockholm International Arbitration Review 2 (2008), 1–20.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, J. and Salle, L.E. ‘Forum Shopping Before International Tribunals: (Real) Concerns, (Im)possible Solutions’, Cornell International Law Journal 42 (2009), 77–118.Google Scholar

Peerenboom, R. ‘Toward a Methodology for Successful Legal Transplant’, Chinese Journal of Comparative Law (2013), 1–17.Google Scholar

Pellet, A. ‘The Case Law of the ICJ in Investment Arbitration’, ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 28 (2013), 223–240.Google Scholar

Perry, A.J. ‘Effective Legal Systems and Foreign Direct Investment: In Search of the Evidence’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 49 (2000), 779–799.Google Scholar

Perry-Kessaris, A. ‘Finding and Facing Facts about Legal Systems and FDI in South Asia’, Legal Studies 23 (2003), 649–689.Google Scholar

Peters, A. ‘New Approaches to Comparative Law’, American Society of International Law. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (1999), 366–369.Google Scholar

Peterson, L.E. ‘In Policy Switch, Australia Disavows Need for Investor–State Arbitration Provisions in Trade and Investment Agreements’, Investment Arbitration Reporter (14 April 2011).Google Scholar

Pfaff, C. ‘Alternative Approaches to Foreign Investment Protection’, Transnational Dispute Management 3 (2006), 1–16.Google Scholar

Pfersmann, O. ‘Le droit comparé comme interprétation et comme théorie du droit’, Revue Internationale de Droit Comparé (2001), 275–288.Google Scholar

Picciotto, S. ‘Linkages in International Investment Regulation: The Antinomies of the Draft Multilateral Agreement on Investment’, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 19 (1998), 731–768.Google Scholar

Picker, C.B. ‘International Law’s Mixed Heritage: A Common/Civil Law Jurisdiction’, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 41 (2008), 1083–1140.Google Scholar

Ponthoreau, M.C. ‘Le droit comparé en question(s) entre pragmatism et outil épistémologique’, Revue internationale de droit comparé 57 (2005), 7–27.Google Scholar

Porat, I. ‘Why All Attempts to Make Judicial Review Balancing Principled Fail?’, paper presented at the VII World Congress of the International Association of Constitutional Law, Athens, 11–15 June 2007.Google Scholar

Posner, R.A. ‘Forward: A Political Court’, Harvard Law Review 119 (2005), 84–91.Google Scholar

Priem, C. ‘International Investment Treaty Arbitration as a Potential Check for Domestic Courts Refusing Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards’, New York University Journal of Law & Business 10 (2013), 189–221.Google Scholar

Puig, S. ‘Emergence and Dynamism in International Organizations: ICSID, Investor–State Arbitration and International Investment Law’, Georgetown Journal of International Law 44 (2013), 531–608.Google Scholar

Puig, S. ‘Social Capital in the Arbitration Market’, European Journal of International Law 25 (2014), 387–424.Google Scholar

Quint, P.E. ‘International Human Rights: The Convergence of Comparative and International Law’, Texas International Law Journal 36 (2001), 605–610.Google Scholar

Ratner, S. ‘Regulatory Takings in Institutional Context: Beyond the Fear of Fragmented International Law’, American Journal of International Law 102 (2008), 475–528.Google Scholar

Rau, A.S. ‘Integrity in Private Judging’, South Texas Law Review 38 (1997), 485–540.Google Scholar

Raustiala, K. ‘Rethinking the Sovereignty Debate in International Economic Law’, Journal of International Economic Law 6 (2003), 841–878.Google Scholar

Raz, J. ‘Why Interpret?’, Ratio Juris 9 (1996), 349–363.Google Scholar

Reed, L. ‘The De Facto Precedent Regime in Investment Arbitration: A Case for Proactive Case Management’, ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 25 (2010), 95–103.Google Scholar

Reimann, M. ‘Beyond National Systems: A Comparative Law for the International Age’, Tulane Law Review 75 (2001), 1103–1120.Google Scholar

Reimann, M. ‘The End of Comparative Law as an Autonomous Subject’, Tulane European and Civil Law Forum 11 (1996), 49–72.Google Scholar

Reisman, W.M. ‘International Investment Arbitration and ADR: Married but Best Living Apart’, ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 24 (2009), 185–192.Google Scholar

Reitz, J.C. ‘How to do Comparative Law’, American Journal of Comparative Law 46 (1998), 617–636.Google Scholar

Reyntjens, F. ‘Note sur l’utilité d’introduire un system juridique “pluraliste” dans la macro-comparaison des droits’, Revue de droit international et droit comparé 68 (1991), 41–50.Google Scholar

Rheinstein, M. ‘Comparative Law and Conflict of Laws in Germany’, The University of Chicago Law Review 2 (1934), 232–269.Google Scholar

Riles, A. ‘Wigmore’s Treasure Box: Comparative Law in the Era of Information’, Harvard International Law Journal 40 (1999), 221–464.Google Scholar

Ripinsky, S. ‘Venezuela’s Withdrawal from ICSID: What it Does and Does Not Achieve’, Investment Treaty News, 13 April 2012.Google Scholar