Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T02:24:51.568Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 18 - Methods of Assessing Treatments

from Section 4 - Treatment of Transient Ischemic Attack and Stroke

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2018

Gary K. K. Lau
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Sarah T. Pendlebury
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Peter M. Rothwell
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Transient Ischemic Attack and Stroke
Diagnosis, Investigation and Treatment
, pp. 265 - 281
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anturane Reinfarction Trial Research Group (1980). Sulfinpyrazone in the prevention of sudden death after myocardial infarction. New England Journal of Medicine 302:250256Google Scholar
Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study Group (1995). Carotid endarterectomy for patients with asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis. Journal of the American Medical Association 273:14211428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, HJ, Taylor, DW, Eliasziw, M et al. (1998). The final results of the NASCET trial. New England Journal of Medicine 339:14151425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) Investigators (1989). Preliminary report: Effect of encainide and flecainide on mortality in a randomised trial of arrhythmia suppression after myocardial infarction. New England Journal of Medicine 321:406412Google Scholar
Charlson, ME, Horwitz, RI (1984). Applying results of randomised trials to clinical practice: Impact of losses before randomisation. British Medical Journal 289:12811284CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coronary Drug Project Research Group (1980). Influence of adherence to treatment and response to cholesterol on mortality in the Coronary Drug Project. New England Journal of Medicine 303:10381041Google Scholar
Dahlof, B, Lindholm, LH, Hansson, L et al. (1991). Morbidity and mortality in the Swedish trial in old patients with hypertension (STOP-hypertension). Lancet 338:12811285CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, KL, Thal, LJ, Gamzu, ER et al. (1992). A double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study of tacrine for Alzheimer’s disease. New England Journal of Medicine 321:406412Google Scholar
Farrell, B, Godwin, J, Richards, S et al. (1991). The United Kingdom transient ischaemic attack (UK-TIA) aspirin trial: Final results. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 54:10441054CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fine, PEM (1995). Variation in protection by BCG: implications of and for heterologous immunity. Lancet 346:13391345CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gorter, JW for the Stroke Prevention in Reversible Ischaemia Trial (SPIRIT) and European Atrial Fibrillation Trial (EAFT) Groups (1999). Major bleeding during anticoagulation after cerebral ischaemia: Patterns and risk factors. Neurology 53:13191327CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gøtzsche, PC (1989). Methodology and overt and hidden bias in reports of 196 double-blind trials of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritis. Control in Clinical Trials 10:3156Google Scholar
Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell’Infarto Miocardico (GISSI) (1986). Effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction. Lancet i:397402Google Scholar
Gurwitz, JH, Col, NF, Avorn, J (1992). The exclusion of elderly and women from clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction. Journal of the American Medical Association 268:14171422Google Scholar
Ioannidis, JP, Contopoulos-Ioannidis, DG (1998). Reporting of safety data from randomised trials. Lancet 352:17521753CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jorgensen, HS, Nakayama, H, Kammersgaard, LP et al. (1999). Predicted impact of intravenous thrombolysis on prognosis of general population of stroke patients: Simulation model. British Medical Journal 319:288289Google Scholar
LaRue, LJ, Alter, M, Traven, ND et al. (1988). Acute stroke therapy trials: Problems in patient accrual. Stroke 19:950954Google Scholar
Marshall, M, Lockwood, A, Bradley, C et al. (2000). Unpublished rating scales: A major source of bias in randomised controlled trials of treatments for schizophrenia? British Journal of Psychiatry 176:249252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medical Research Council Working Party (1985). MRC trial of treatment of mild hypertension: Principal results. British Medical Journal 291:97104Google Scholar
Noseworthy, JH, Ebers, GC, Vandervoort, MK et al. (1994). The impact of blinding on the results of a randomized, placebo-controlled multiple sclerosis clinical trial. Neurology 44:1620CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pincus, T (1998). Rheumatoid arthritis: Disappointing long-term outcomes despite successful short-term clinical trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 41:10371041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggs, BL, Hodgson, SF, O’Fallon, WM et al. (1990). Effect of fluoride treatment on fracture rate in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. New England Journal of Medicine 322:802809Google Scholar
Rothwell, PM (2005a). External validity of randomised controlled trials: To whom do the results of this trial apply? Lancet 365:8293Google Scholar
Rothwell, PM (2005b). Subgroup analysis in randomised controlled trials: Importance, indications and interpretation. Lancet 365:176186Google Scholar
Rothwell, PM, Warlow, CP (1995). Is self-audit reliable? Lancet 346:1623Google Scholar
Rothwell, PM, Giles, MF, Chandratheva, A et al. (2007). Major reduction in risk of early recurrent stroke by urgent treatment of TIA and minor stroke: EXPRESS Study. Lancet 370:14321442Google Scholar
Shapiro, SH, Weijer, C, Freedman, B (2000). Reporting the study populations of clinical trials. Clear transmission or static on the line? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 53:973979Google Scholar
Taylor, DW, Barnett, HJM, Haynes, RB et al. (1999). Low dose and high dose acetylsalicylic acid for patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet 353:21792184Google Scholar
Temple, R, Pledger, GW (1980). The FDA’s critique of the Anturane Reinfarction Trial. New England Journal of Medicine 303:14881492Google Scholar
Thornley, B, Adams, CE (1998). Content and quality of 2000 controlled trials in schizophrenia over 50 years. British Medical Journal 317:11811184Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×