Book contents
- Environmental Expertise
- Reviews
- Environmental Expertise
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 What Is Science? (And Why Does This Matter?)
- 3 Frames: Beyond Facts Versus Values
- Case A Framing Climate Change
- 4 Science, Politics, and the Public in Knowledge Controversies
- Case B What Does ‘Climategate’ Tell Us About Public Knowledge Controversies
- Case C Whose Deficit Anyway? Institutional Misunderstanding of Fracking-Sceptical Publics
- 5 The Limits to Knowledge
- Case D Angry Bulbs
- 6 Usable Knowledge
- Case E Expertise for European Fisheries Policy
- 7 Interdisciplinarity and the Challenge of Knowledge Integration
- Case F Knowledge Integration in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
- Case G Integrated Assessment for Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution
- 8 Lay Expertise
- Case H Lay Expertise and Botanical Science
- Case I The Loweswater Care Project
- 9 Environmental Experts at the Science–Policy–Society Interface
- Case J Groupthink and Whistle Blowers in CO2 Capture and Storage
- 10 Environmental Knowledge in Democracy
- 11 Conclusion
- Index
- References
Case E - Expertise for European Fisheries Policy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 February 2019
Book contents
- Environmental Expertise
- Reviews
- Environmental Expertise
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 What Is Science? (And Why Does This Matter?)
- 3 Frames: Beyond Facts Versus Values
- Case A Framing Climate Change
- 4 Science, Politics, and the Public in Knowledge Controversies
- Case B What Does ‘Climategate’ Tell Us About Public Knowledge Controversies
- Case C Whose Deficit Anyway? Institutional Misunderstanding of Fracking-Sceptical Publics
- 5 The Limits to Knowledge
- Case D Angry Bulbs
- 6 Usable Knowledge
- Case E Expertise for European Fisheries Policy
- 7 Interdisciplinarity and the Challenge of Knowledge Integration
- Case F Knowledge Integration in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
- Case G Integrated Assessment for Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution
- 8 Lay Expertise
- Case H Lay Expertise and Botanical Science
- Case I The Loweswater Care Project
- 9 Environmental Experts at the Science–Policy–Society Interface
- Case J Groupthink and Whistle Blowers in CO2 Capture and Storage
- 10 Environmental Knowledge in Democracy
- 11 Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Environmental ExpertiseConnecting Science, Policy and Society, pp. 141 - 151Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Davis, R. (2014). A Cod Forsaken Place?: Fishing in an Altered State in Newfoundland. Anthropological Quarterly, 87(3), 695–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daw, T., and Gray, T. (2005). Fisheries Science and Sustainability in International Policy: A Study of Failure in the European Union’s Common Fisheries Policy. Marine Policy, 29, 189–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission. (2016). Facts and Figures on the Common Fisheries Policy: Basic Statistical Data, 2016 Edition. https://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/sites/fisheries/files/docs/body/pcp_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Halffman, W. (2008). States of Nature: Nature and Fish Stock Reports for Policy. The Hague: RMNO.Google Scholar
Halffman, W., and Hoppe, R. (2005). Science/Policy Boundaries: A Changing Division of Labour in Dutch Expert Policy Advice. In Maasen, S. and Weingart, P., eds., Democratization of Expertise? Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-making (pp. 135–152). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauge, K. H. (2011). Uncertainty and Hyper-precision in Fisheries Science and Policy. Futures, 43(2), 173–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm, P., and Nielsen, K. N. (2004). The TAC Machine, Appendix B, Working Document no. 1 to the 2004 ICES Annual Report of the Working Group for Fisheries Systems. www.ices.dk.Google Scholar
International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. (2006). Fish Stocks: Counting the Uncountable? www.ices.dk.Google Scholar
Kaiser, M. J., Attrill, M. J., Jennings, S., et al. (2005). Marine Ecology: Processes, Systems, and Impacts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kooiman, J., Bavinck, M., Jentoff, S., and Pullin, R., eds. (2005). Fish for Life: Interactive Governance for Fisheries. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Kurlansky, M. (1997). Cod: A Biography of the Fish that Changed the World. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, J. (2009). French Fishermen Maintain Channel Port Blockade. http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-france-ports-idUKTRE53E58P20090415Google Scholar
Meadows, D., Sterman, J., and King, A. (2017). Fishbanks: A Renewable Resource Management Simulation. https://mitsloan.mit.edu/LearningEdge/simulations/fishbanks/Pages/fish-banks.aspxGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payton, M. (2016, 30 June). UK Fishermen Warned Catch Quotas May Not Increase with Brexit. The Independent. www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/uk-fisherman-warned-catch-quotas-may-not-increase-with-brexit-a7110766.htmlGoogle Scholar
Rozwadowski, H. M. (2002). The Sea Knows no Boundaries: A Century of Marine Science under ICES. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Rozwadowski, H. M. (2004). Internationalism, Environmental Necessity, and National Interest: Marine Science and Other Sciences. Minerva, 42(2), 127–149. doi:10.1023/b:mine.0000030023.04586.45Google Scholar
Steinsson, S. (2016). The Cod Wars: A Re-analysis. European Security, 25(2), 256–275. doi:10.1080/09662839.2016.1160376CrossRefGoogle Scholar