Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity Across Domains
- The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity Across Domains
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Creativity and Domain
- Part II Creativity in the Traditional Arts
- Part III Creativity in the Sciences
- Part IV Creativity in Business
- Part V Newer Domains for Creativity Research
- Part VI Creativity in Everyday Life
- Part VII Conclusion
- Index
- References
Part II - Creativity in the Traditional Arts
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 September 2017
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity Across Domains
- The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity Across Domains
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Creativity and Domain
- Part II Creativity in the Traditional Arts
- Part III Creativity in the Sciences
- Part IV Creativity in Business
- Part V Newer Domains for Creativity Research
- Part VI Creativity in Everyday Life
- Part VII Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
Abstract
Literary writing involves externalization of mind onto paper or computer screen, and a process of guided exploration over a space of possibilities. Among the arts, this kind of writing may come closest in structure and content to everyday consciousness; this has enabled writers and readers to explore the workings of minds in interactions with others. Artistic writing is a kind of indirect communication in which the creativity of the writer invites the creativity of the reader. In personality, writers are higher in openness but more often depressed than other members of the population. Characteristics on which literary creativity is based make writers vulnerable to emotional disorders. With the exception of conversation, nothing may have been as important in understanding ourselves and others as works of creative writing.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity across Domains , pp. 61 - 196Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
References
Aristotle, . (circa 330 BC). Poetics (Else, G. E., Trans.). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press (1970).Google Scholar
Aristotle, . (circa 330 BCE). Problems. In Barnes, J. (Ed.), The complete works of Artistotle: The revised Oxford translation (pp. 1319–1527), Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press (Current publication 1984).Google Scholar
Arnheim, R. (1962). Picasso’s Guernica: The genesis of a painting. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Baer, J., & McKool, S. S. (2009). How rewards and evaluations can undermine creativity (and how to prevent this). In Kaufman, S. B. & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.), The psychology of creative writing (pp. 277–286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., & Masicampo, E. J. (2010). Conscious thought is for facilitating social and cultural interactions: How mental simulations serve the animal-culture interface. Psychological Review, 117, 945–971.Google Scholar
Bell, A. O., & McNeillie, A. (Eds.). (1977–1984). The diary of Virginia Woolf, Five Volumes. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Muni, Bharata. (200 BC). Natyasastra; English translation with critical notes (Rangacharya, A., Trans.). Bangalore: IBH Prakashana (Current edition 1986).Google Scholar
Bischoff, T., & Peskin, J. (2014). Do fiction writers have superior perspective taking ability? Scientific Study of Literature, 4, 125–149.Google Scholar
Black, J. E., & Barnes, J. L. (2015). The effects of reading material on social and non-social cognition. Poetics, 52, 32–43.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retentions in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380–400.Google Scholar
Chanquoy, L., & Alamargot, D. (2002). Working memory and writing: Evolution of models and assessment of research/Mémoire de travail et rédaction de textes: évolution des modèles et bilan des premiers travaux. L’annee Psychologique, 102, 363–398.Google Scholar
Coleridge, S. T. (1977). “Kubla Khan,” in The portable Coleridge (with explanatory note on writing the poem, pp. 156–157). Harmondsworth: Penguin (Original publication 1816).Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection. London: Murray.Google Scholar
Debray Genette, R. (2004). Flaubert’s “A simple heart,” or how to make an ending: A study of manuscripts. In Deppman, J., Ferrer, D. & Groden, M. (Eds.), Genetic criticism: Texts and avant-textes (pp. 69–95). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Deppman, J., Ferrer, D., & Groden, M. (Eds.). (2004). Genetic criticism: Texts and avant-textes. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Di Biasi, PM. (2002). Flaubert: The labor of writing. In Christtin, A. M. (Ed.), A history of writing: From hieroglyph to multimedia (pp. 340–341). Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Djikic, M., & Oatley, K. (2014a). The art in fiction: From indirect communication to changes of the self. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 498–505.Google Scholar
Djikic, M., & Oatley, K. (2014b). On the fragility of the artist: Art’s precarious triad. In Kaufman, J. C. (Ed.), Creativity and mental illness (pp. 281–294). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Djikic, M., Oatley, K., & Carland, M. (2012). Genre or artistic merit: The effect of literature on personality. Scientific Study of Literature, 2, 25.36.Google Scholar
Djikic, M., Oatley, K., & Peterson, J. (2006). The bitter-sweet labor of emoting: The linguistic comparison of writers and physicists. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 191–197.Google Scholar
Djikic, M., Oatley, K., Zoeterman, S., & Peterson, J. (2009). On being moved by art: How reading fiction transforms the self. Creativity Research Journal, 21, 24–29.Google Scholar
Eliot, G. (1856). The natural history of German life: Riehl. The works of George Eliot. Standard Edition: Essays (pp. 188–236). Edinburgh: Blackwood (this edition 1883).Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211–245.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., & Lehmann, A. C. (1999). Expertise. In Runco, M. A. & Pritzker, S. R. (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of Creativity, Volume 1 (pp. 695–706). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K., & Simon, H. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215–251.Google Scholar
Feuer, K. B. (1996). Tolstoy and the genesis of War and Peace. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (1985). The mind’s new science: A history of the cognitive revolution. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Haviland, J. M. (1984). Thinking and feeling in Woolf’s writing: From childhood to adulthood. In Izard, C. E., Kagan, J. & Zajonc, R. B. (Eds.), Emotions, cognition, and behavior (pp. 515–546). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In Gregg, L. W. & Steinberg, E. R. (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3–30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1986). Writing research and the writer. American Psychologist, 41, 1106–1113.Google Scholar
Hecq, D. (2015). Towards a poetics of creative writing. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Hellman, L. (1955). The selected letters of Anton Chekhov (Lederer, S. K., Trans.). New York: Farrar, Straus & Co.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. M., McGowan, P., & Knafo-Noam, A. (2015). Parent-offspring transaction: Mechanisms and the value of within-family designs. Hormones and Behavior, Online 2 July. DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2015.06.018Google Scholar
Johnson, S. (2006). Samuel Johnson’s Lives of the poets. Oxford: Oxford University Press (Original work published 1779–1781).Google Scholar
Joy, S., & Breed, K. (2012). Innovation motivation, divergent thinking, and creative story writing: Convergence and divergence across the Torrance Tests and TAT. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 32, 179–185.Google Scholar
Joyce, J. (1986). Ulysses. London: Penguin and Bodley Head (Originally published 1922).Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (2001). The Sylvia Plath effect: Mental illness in eminent creative writers. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 37–50.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (Ed.). (2014). Creativity and mental illness. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2002). I bask in dreams of suicide. Mental illness, poetry, and women. Review of General Psychology, 6, 271–286.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., & Sexton, J., D. (2006). Why doesn’t the writing cure help poets? Review of General Psychology, 10, 268–282.Google Scholar
Kaufman, S. B., & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.). (2009). The psychology of creative writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., Cropley, D. H., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Sinnett, S. (2013). Furious activity vs. understanding: How much expertise is needed to evaluate creative work? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7, 332–340.Google Scholar
Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E. (2013). Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342, 377–380.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S. (1968). Concluding unscientific postscript (Swenson, D. F. & Lowrie, W., Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (Original work published 1846).Google Scholar
King, R. (2000). Brunelleschi’s dome: The story of the great cathedral in Florence. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
Kyaga, S. (2015). Creativity and mental illness: The mad genius in question. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kyaga, S., Landén, M., Boman, M., Hultman, C. M., Langstrom, N., & Lichtenstein, P. (2013). Mental illness, suicide and creativity: 40-Year prospective total population study. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 47, 1–8.Google Scholar
Lubart, T. (2009). In search of the writer’s creative process. In Kaufman, S. B. & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.), The psychology of creative writing (pp. 3–22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mar, R., Oatley, K., Djikic, M., & Mullin, J. (2011). Emotion and narrative fiction: Interactive influences before, during, and after reading. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 818–833.Google Scholar
Maslej, M., Rain, M., Fong, K., Oatley, K., & Mar, R. A. (2014). The hierarchical personality structure of aspiring creative writers. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 192–202.Google Scholar
Oatley, K. (1999). Why fiction may be twice as true as fact: Fiction as cognitive and emotional simulation. Review of General Psychology, 3, 101–117.Google Scholar
Oatley, K. (2003). Writingandreading: The future of cognitive poetics. In Steen, G.J. & Gavins, J. (Eds.), Cognitive poetics in practice. (pp. 161–173). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Oatley, K. (2011). Such stuff as dreams: The psychology of fiction. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Oatley, K. (2013). Worlds of the possible: Abstraction, imagination, consciousness. Pragmatics and Cognition, 21, 448–468.Google Scholar
Oatley, K., & Djikic, M. (2008). Writing as thinking. Review of General Psychology, 12, 9–27.Google Scholar
Patrick, C. (1935). Creative thought in poets. Archives of Psychology (R Woodworth, Ed.), 178, 35–73.Google Scholar
Pennebaker, J. W., & Chung, C. K. (2011). Expressive writing: Connections to mental and physical health. In Friedman, H. S. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of health psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Piirto, J. (2009). The personalities of creative writers In Kaufman, S. B. & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.), The psychology of creative writing (pp. 149–165). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Poincaré, H. (1908). Mathematical creation (translation by Halstead, G.B, of Le Raisonnement Mathematique, in Science et Methode, Paris: Flammarion). In Ghiselin, B. (Ed.), The creative process. Berkeley: University of California Press (1952).Google Scholar
Runco, M. A., Millar, G., Acar, S., Cramond, B. (2010) Torrance tests of creative thinking as predictors of personal and public achievement: A fifty year follow-up. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 361–368.Google Scholar
Schneider, J. W., & McGrew, K. S. (2012). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll model of intelligence. In Flanagan, D. P. & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (3rd edition) (pp. 99–144). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2013). Creative thought as blind variation and selective retention: Why creativity is inversely related to sightedness. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 33, 253–266.Google Scholar
Turing, A. (1936). On computable numbers with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, Second series, 42, 230–265.Google Scholar
Wells-Jopling, R., & Oatley, K. (2012). Metonymy and intimacy. Journal of Literary Theory, 6, 235–252.Google Scholar
References
Acosta, L. M. Y. (2014). Creativity and neurological disease. Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 14(8), 1–6.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1982). Children’s artistic creativity: Detrimental effects of competition in a field setting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 573–578.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997–1013.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to “The social psychology of creativity.” Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (2001). Beyond talent: John Irving and the passionate craft of creativity. American Psychologist, 56, 333–336.Google Scholar
Arnheim, R. (1956). Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M., & Conti, R. (1997). Environmental determinants of work motivation, creativity, and innovation: The case of R&D downsizing. Technological innovation: Oversights and foresights, 111–125.Google Scholar
Arrell, D. (1997). Teaching aesthetics to artists. American Society for Aesthetics Newsletter, 17(2). Retrieved on April 10, 2017 from http://aesthetics-online.org/?page=ArrellArtists.Google Scholar
Aziz-Zadeh, L., Liew, S. L., & Dandekar, F. (2013). Exploring the neural correlates of visual creativity. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(4), 475–480.Google Scholar
Baer, J. (1993). Creativity and divergent thinking: A task-specific approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Baer, J. (1994). Performance assessments of creativity: Do they have long-term stability? Roeper Review, 7(1), 7–11.Google Scholar
Baer, J., & McKool, S. (2009). Assessing creativity using the consensual assessment. In Schreiner, C. (Ed.), Handbook of assessment technologies, methods, and applications in higher education. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
Ball, O. E., & Torrance, E. P. (1984). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Streamlined scoring workbook: Figural and B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.Google Scholar
Barbot, B., & Tinio, P. P. L. (2015). Where is the “g” in creativity? A specialization-differentiation hypothesis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1–4.Google Scholar
Barron, F., & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32(1), 439–476.Google Scholar
Besemer, S. (1998) Creative Product Analysis Matrix: Testing the model structure and a comparison among products-three novel chairs. Creativity Research Journal, 11(4), 333–346.Google Scholar
Besemer, S., & O’Quin, K. (1987). Creative analysis: Testing a model by developing a judging instrument. In Isaksen, S. (Ed.), Frontiers of creativity research (pp. 367–389). Buffalo, NY: Bearly.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, J., & Petsche, H. (2005). Drawing on mind’s canvas: Differences in cortical integration patterns between artists and non-artists. Human Brain Mapping, 26(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
Bogousslavsky, J. (2005). Artistic creativity, style and brain disorders. European Journal of Neurology, 54(2), 103–11.Google Scholar
Canesi, M., Rusconi, M. L., Isaias, I. U., & Pezzoli, G. (2012). Artistic productivity and creative thinking in Parkinson’s disease. European Journal of Neurology, 19, 468–472.Google Scholar
Carothers, T., & Gardner, H. (1979). When children’s drawings become art: The emergence of aesthetic production and perception. Developmental Psychology, 15(5), 570.Google Scholar
Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17(1), 37–50.Google Scholar
Cassandro, V., & Simonton, K. (2010). Versatility, openness to experience, and topical diversity in creative products: An exploratory historiometric analysis of scientists, philosophers, and writers. Journal of Creative Behavior, 44, 1–18.Google Scholar
Cela-Conde, C. J., Agnati, L., Huston, J. P., Mora, F., & Nadal, M. (2011). The neural foundations of aesthetic appreciation. Progress in Neurobiology, 94(1), 39–48.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, R., McManus, I. C., Riley, H., Rankin, Q., & Brunswick, N. (2013). Local processing enhancements associated with superior observational drawing are due to enhanced perceptual functioning, not weak central coherence. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(7), 1448–1466.Google Scholar
Chan, D. W., & Chan, L. (2007). Creativity and drawing abilities of Chinese students in Hong Kong: Is there a connection? New Horizons in Education, 55(3), 77–94.Google Scholar
Chan, D. W., & Zhao, Y. (2010). The relationship between drawing skill and artistic creativity: Do age and artistic involvement make a difference? Creativity Research Journal, 22(1), 27–36.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, A. (2003). Prospects for a cognitive neuroscience of visual aesthetics. Bulletin of Psychology of the Arts, 4(2), 55–60.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, A. (2004). The neuropsychology of visual artistic production. Neuropsychologia, 42(11), 1568–1583.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, A. (2010). Neuroaesthetics: A coming of age story. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(1), 53–62.Google Scholar
Chen, C., Himsel, A., Kasof, J., Greenberger, E., & Dmitrieva, J. (2006). Boundless creativity: Evidence for the domain generality of individual differences in creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 40, 179–199.Google Scholar
Clark, G., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Teaching talented art students: Principles and practices. New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Cohen, D. J. (2005). Look little, look often: The influence of gaze frequency on drawing accuracy. Perception & Psychophysics, 67(6), 997–1009.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 5–13.Google Scholar
Cox, M.V., Koyasu, M., Hiranuma, H. & Perara, J. (2001). Children’s human figure drawings in the UK and Japan: The effects of age, sex, and culture. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 19, 275–292.Google Scholar
Cropley, A. J. (2000). Defining and measuring creativity: are creativity tests worth using? Roeper Review, 23(2), 72–79.Google Scholar
Cramond, B., Matthews-Morgan, J., Torrance, E. P., & Zuo, L. (1999). Why should the Torrance tests of creative thinking be used to assess creativity? The Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, 9, 77–101.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 325–339). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). The creative personality. Psychology Today, 29(4), 36–40.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313–335). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Abuhamdeh, S., & Nakamura, J. (2005). Flow. A general context for a concept of mastery motivation. In Elliot, A. J. & Dweck, C. S. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 598–608). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
Dake, D. M. (1991). The visual definition of visual creativity. Journal of Visual Literacy, 1, 99–118.Google Scholar
Davis, J. (1993). Drawing’s demise: U-shaped development in graphic symbolization. Studies in Art Education, 38, 132–157.Google Scholar
Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (1982). Group Inventory for Finding Interests (GIFFI) I and II: Instruments for identifying creative potential in junior and senior high school. Journal of Creative Behavior, 16, 50–57.Google Scholar
DeYoung, C. G. (2006). Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(6), 1138–1151.Google Scholar
Dissanayake, E. (2000). Art and intimacy: How the arts began. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Drago, V., Foster, P. S., Okun, M. S., Haq, I., Sudhyadhom, A., Skidmore, F. M., & Heilman, K. M. (2009). Artistic creativity and DBS: a case report. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 276(1), 138–142.Google Scholar
Drake, J. E., & Winner, E. (2009). Precocious realists: Perceptual and cognitive characteristics associated with drawing talent in non-autistic children. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1522), 1449–1458.Google Scholar
Dutton, D. (2009). The art instinct: Beauty, pleasure & human evolution. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eisner, E. W. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. (1996). The acquisition of expert performance: An introduction to some of the issues. In Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.), The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports and games (pp. 1–50). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Espinel, C. H. (1996) de Kooning’s late colours and forms: Dementia, creativity, and the healing power of art. Lancet, 347, 1096–1098.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1997). Creativity and personality. In Runco, M. (Ed.), The creativity research handbook (pp. 41–66). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309.Google Scholar
Feist, G. (1999). The influence of personality on artistic and scientific creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 273–296). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feist, G. J., & Brady, T. R. (2004). Openness to experience, non-conformity, and the preference for abstract art. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22(1), 77–89.Google Scholar
Feldman, D. H. (1999). The development of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 169–188). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, D. H. (2003). Key issues in creativity and development. In Sawyer, R. K., John-Steiner, V., Moran, S., Sternberg, R. J., Feldman, D. H., Nakamura, J. et al. (Eds.), Creativity and development (pp. 219–220). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finke, R. A. (1990). Creative imagery: Discoveries and inventions in visualization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Franck, K., & Rosen, E. (1949). A projective test of masculinity-femininity. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 13(4), 247.Google Scholar
Frecska, E., More, C. E., Vargha, A., & Luna, L. E. (2012). Enhancement of creative expression and entoptic phenomena as after-effects of repeated ayahuasca ceremonies. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 44, 191–199.Google Scholar
Gallo, F., Golomb, C., & Barroso, A. (2002). Compositional strategies in drawing: The effects of two-and three-dimensional media. Visual Arts Research, 28, 2–23.Google Scholar
Gansler, D. A., Moore, D. W., Susmaras, T. M., Jerram, M. W., Sousa, J., & Heilman, K. M. (2011). Cortical morphology of visual creativity. Neuropsychologia, 49(9), 2527–2532.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (1989). The key in the slot: Creativity in a Chinese key. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 23, 141–158.Google Scholar
Gardner, H., & Winner, E. (1982). First intimations of artistry. In Strauss, S. (Ed.), U-shaped behavioral growth (pp. 147–168). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Getzels, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem-finding in art. New York, NY: Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
Golomb, C. (1992). The child’s creation of a pictorial world. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gombrich, E. H. (1960). Art and illusion: A study in the psychology of pictorial representation. Bollingen Ser. XXXV, (5), 9.Google Scholar
Goodman, N. (1968). Languages of art: An approach to a theory of symbols. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Gretton, C., & ffytche, D. H. (2014). Art and the brain: A view from dementia. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 29(2), 111–126.Google Scholar
Han, K. (2003). Domain specificity of creativity in young children: How quantitative and qualitative data support it. Journal of Creative Behavior, 37, 117–142.Google Scholar
Hekkert, P., & Van Wieringen, P. C. (1996). Beauty in the eye of expert and nonexpert beholders: A study in the appraisal of art. The American Journal of Psychology, 109(3), 389–407.Google Scholar
Helson, R. (1999). A longitudinal study of creative personality in women. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 89–102.Google Scholar
Hennessey, B. A. (1994). The consensual assessment technique: An examination of the relationships between ratings of product and process creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 193–208.Google Scholar
Holert, T. (2009, Summer). A child could do it. Cabinet, 34. Retrieved on April 10, 2017, from http://cabinetmagazine.org/issues/34/holert.php.Google Scholar
Huntsinger, C. S., Schoeneman, J., & Ching, W. D. (1994). A cross-cultural study of young children’s performance on drawing and handwriting tasks. Paper presented at the conference of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Husslein-Arco, A., & Koja, S. (2010). Lovis Corinth: A feast of painting. Munich: Prestel.Google Scholar
Inzelberg, R. (2013). The awakening of artistic creativity and Parkinson’s disease. Behavioral Neuroscience, 127(2), 256.Google Scholar
Jellen, H., and Urban, K. K. (1988). Assessing creative potential world-wide: The first cross- cultural application of the TCT-DP. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 14, 151–167.Google Scholar
Jaarsveld, S., & Leeuwen, C. (2005). Sketches from a design process: Creative cognition inferred from intermediate products. Cognitive Science, 29(1), 79–101.Google Scholar
Jackson, P. W., & Messick, S. (1965). The person, the product, and the response: Conceptual problems in the assessment of creativity. Journal of Personality, 33(3), 309–329.Google Scholar
Jarosewich, T., Pfeiffer, S., & Morris, J. (2002). Identifying gifted students using teacher rating scales: A review of existing instruments. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 20, 322–336.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Counting the muses: Development of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(4), 298.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2004). Sure, I’m creative – but not in mathematics!: Self-reported creativity in diverse domains. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22, 143–155.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2005). The amusement park theory of creativity. In Kaufman, J. C. & Baer, J. (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 321–328). New York, NY: Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2012). Beyond new and appropriate: Who decides what is creative? Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 83–91.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J., Cole, J., & Baer, J. (2009). The construct of creativity: Structural model for self-reported creativity ratings. Journal of Creative Behavior, 43, 119–134.Google Scholar
Kay, S. (1991). The figural problem solving and problem finding of professional and semi-professional artists and non-artists. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 233–252.Google Scholar
Khatena, J., & Torrance, E. (1976). Khatena-Torrance Creative Perception Inventory. Chicago, IL: Stoelting.Google Scholar
Kim, K. H. (2006). Can we trust creativity tests? A review of the Torrance tests of creative thinking (TTCT). Creativity Research Journal, 18, 3–14.Google Scholar
Kowatari, Y., Lee, S. H., Yamamura, H., Nagamori, Y., Levy, P., Yamane, S. et al. (2009). Neural networks involved in artistic creativity. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 1678–1690.Google Scholar
Kozbelt, A. (2004). Originality and technical skill as components of artistic quality. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22, 157–170.Google Scholar
Kozbelt, A., & Serafin, J. (2009). Dynamic evaluation of high-and low-creativity drawings by artist and nonartist raters. Creativity Research Journal, 21(4), 349–360.Google Scholar
Kottlow, M., Praeg, E., Luethy, C., & Jancke, L. (2011). Artists’ advance: Decreased upper alpha power while drawing in artists compared with non-artists. Brain Topography, 23(4), 392–402.Google Scholar
Kulisevsky, J., Pagonabarraga, J., & Martinez-Corral, M. (2009). Changes in artistic style and behaviour in Parkinson’s disease: Dopamine and creativity. Journal of Neurology, 256, 816–819.Google Scholar
Leder, H. (2013). Next steps in neuroaesthetics: Which processes and processing stages to study? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(1), 27–37.Google Scholar
Leder, H. (2014). Beyond perception – Information processing approaches to art appreciation. In Tinio, P. P. L. & Smith, J. K. (Eds), The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of aesthetics and the arts (pp. 115–138). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 489–508.Google Scholar
Lemons, G. (2011). Diverse perspectives of creativity testing controversial issues when used for inclusion into gifted programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(5), 742–772.Google Scholar
Li, J. (1997). Creativity in horizontal and vertical domains. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 107–132.Google Scholar
Lubart, T. I., & Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Creativity across time and place: Life span and cross-cultural perspective. High Ability Studies, 9, 59–74.Google Scholar
Ludington, C. (1965). Creativity and conformity: A problem for organizations. Ann Arbor, MI: Foundation for Research on Human Behavior.Google Scholar
Lundy, D. E. (2012). Degrees of quality: A method for quantifying aesthetic impact. Psychology Research, 2(4), 205–221.Google Scholar
Marks, D. F. (1973). Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. British Journal of Psychology, 64(1), 17–24.Google Scholar
McKelvie, S. J. (1995). The VVIQ as a psychometric test of individual differences in visual imagery vividness: A critical quantitative review and plea for direction. Journal of Mental Imagery, 19, 1–106.Google Scholar
McManus, I. C., Chamberlain, R., Loo, P. W., Rankin, Q., Riley, H., & Brunswick, N. (2010). Art students who cannot draw: Exploring the relations between drawing ability, visual memory, accuracy of copying, and dyslexia. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(1), 18.Google Scholar
Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.Google Scholar
Meeker, M., & Meeker, R. (1985). Structure of intellect learning abilities test. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
Mell, J. C., Howard, S. M., & Miller, B. L. (2003) Art and the brain: The influence of frontotemporal dementia on an accomplished artist. Neurology, 60, 1707–1710.Google Scholar
Meyers, J. E., & Meyers, K. R. (1995). Rey Complex figure test and recognition trial. Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Miall, R. C., & Tchalenko, J. (2001). A painter’s eye movements: A study of eye and hand movement during portrait drawing. Leonardo, 34(1), 35–40.Google Scholar
Midorikawa, A., Fukutake, T., & Kawamura, M. (2008). Dementia and painting in patients from different cultural backgrounds. European Neurology, 60(5), 224–229.Google Scholar
Milbrath, C. (1998). Patterns of artistic development in children: Comparative studies of talent. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, B. L., & Hou, C. E. (2004). Portraits of artists: emergence of visual creativity in dementia. Archives of Neurology, 61(6), 842–844.Google Scholar
Miller, B. L., Ponton, M., Benson, D. F., Cummings, J. L., & Mena, I. (1996). Enhanced artistic creativity with temporal lobe degeneration. The Lancet, 348(9043), 1744–1745.Google Scholar
Mitchell, W. T. J. (1987). Iconology; image, text, ideology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Moore, D. W., Bhadelia, R., Billings, R., Fulwiler, D., Heilman, K. M., Rood, K. M. J. et al. (2009). Hemispheric connectivity and the visual-spatial divergent thinking component of creativity. Brain and Cognition, 70(3), 267–272.Google Scholar
Moran, J. D. III, Milgram, R. M., Sawyers, J. K., & Fu, V. R. (1983). Original thinking in preschool children. Child Development, 54(4), 921–926.Google Scholar
Mottron, L., Belleville, S., & Ménard, E. (1999). Local bias in autistic subjects as evidenced by graphic tasks: Perceptual hierarchization or working memory deficit? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40(05), 743–755.Google Scholar
Myszkowski, N., Storme, M., Zenasni, F., & Lubart, T. (2014). Is visual aesthetic sensitivity independent from intelligence, personality and creativity? Personality and Individual Differences, 59, 16–20.Google Scholar
Niu, W. H., & Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Cultural influences on artistic creativity and its evaluation. International Journal of Psychology, 36, 225–241.Google Scholar
Palmiero, M., Di Giacomo, D., & Passafiume, D. (2012). Creativity and dementia: A review. Cognitive Processing, 13(3), 193–209.Google Scholar
Palmiero, M., Nakatani, C., Raver, D., Belardinelli, M. O., & van Leeuwen, C. (2010). Abilities within and across visual and verbal domains: How specific is their influence on creativity? Creativity Research Journal, 22(4), 369–377.Google Scholar
Pelowski, M., & Akiba, F. (2011). A model of art perception, evaluation and emotion in transformative aesthetic experience. New Ideas in Psychology, 29(2), 80–97.Google Scholar
Pérez-Fabello, M. J., & Campos, A. (2007). The influence of imaging capacity on visual art skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2(2), 128–135.Google Scholar
Plucker, J. A. (1999). Is the proof in the pudding? Reanalyses of Torrance’s (1958 to present) longitudinal data. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 103–114.Google Scholar
Plucker, J. A. (2005). The (relatively) generalist view of creativity. In Kaufman, J. & Baer, J. (Eds.), Creativity across domains (pp. 307–312). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rankin, K. P., Liu, A. A., Howard, S., Slama, H., Hou, C. E., Shuster, K., & Miller, B. L. (2007). A case-controlled study of altered visual art production in Alzheimer’s and FTLD. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology: Official Journal of the Society for Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology, 20(1), 48.Google Scholar
Rawlings, D., & Locarnini, A. (2007). Validating the creativity scale for diverse domains using groups of artists and scientists. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 25(2), 163–172.Google Scholar
Renzulli, J. S., Smith, L., White, A., Callahan, C., & Hartman, R. (1976). Scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.Google Scholar
Rimm, S., & Davis, G. A. (1980). Five years of international research with GIFT: An instrument for the identification of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 14, 35–46.Google Scholar
Rostan, S. M. (1997). A study of young artists: The development of talent and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 175–192.Google Scholar
Rostan, S. M. (1998). The development of artistic talent and creativity: An evolving systems approach. AGATE (Journal of the Gifted and Talented Education Council of the Alberta Teachers’ Association), 12(2), 15–25.Google Scholar
Rostan, S. M. (2005). Educational intervention and the development of young art students’ talent and creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39, 237–283.Google Scholar
Rostan, S. M. (2010). Studio learning: Motivation, competence, and the development of young art students’ talent and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 261–271.Google Scholar
Rostan, S. M., Pariser, D., & Gruber, H. E. (2002). A cross-cultural study of the development of artistic talent, creativity, and giftedness. High Ability Studies, 13, 125–156.Google Scholar
Roy, D. D. (1996). Personality model of fine artists. Creativity Research Journal, 9(4), 391–394.Google Scholar
Rudowicz, E., Lok, D., & Kitto, J. (1995). Use of the Torrance tests of creative thinking in an exploratory study of creativity in Hong Kong primary school children: A cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Psychology, 30, 417–430.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A. (1987). Interrater agreement on a socially valid measure of students’ creativity. Psychological Reports, 61, 1009–1010.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A., & Chand, I. (1995). Cognition and creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 243–267.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A., Millar, G., Acar, S., & Cramond, B. (2010). Torrance tests of creative thinking as predictors of personal and public achievement: A fifty-year follow-up. Creativity Research Journal, 22(4), 361–368.Google Scholar
Sawyers, J. K., & Canestaro, N. C. (1989). Creativity and achievement in design coursework. Creativity Research Journal, 2(1–2), 126–133.Google Scholar
Schaefer, C. E., & Anastasi, A. (1968). A biographical inventory for identifying creativity in adolescent boys. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 42–48.Google Scholar
Schraw, G. (2005). Review of the Khatena-Torrance Creative Perception Inventory. In Spies, R. & Plake, B. (Eds.), The sixteenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 542–543). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Serafin, J., Kozbelt, A., Seidel, A., & Dolese, M. (2011). Dynamic evaluation of high-and low-creativity drawings by artist and nonartist raters: Replication and methodological extension. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(4), 350–359.Google Scholar
Serrano, C., Allegri, R. F., Martelli, M., Taragano, F., & Rinalli, P. (2005). Visual art, creativity and dementia. Vertex 16(64), 418–429.Google Scholar
Sessa, B. (2008). Is it time to revisit the role of psychedelic drugs in enhancing human creativity? Journal of Psychopharmacology, 22, 821–827.Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J., Nusbaum, E. C., Berg, C., Martin, C., & O’Connor, A. (2009). Openness to experience, plasticity, and creativity: Exploring lower-order, high-order, and interactive effects. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(6), 1087–1090.Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2009). Is creativity domain-specific? Latent class models of creative accomplishments and creative self-descriptions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(3), 139.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1984). Artistic creativity and interpersonal relationships across and within generations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1273–1286.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1996). Creative expertise: A life-span developmental perspective. In Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.), The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games (pp. 227–253). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
Solso, R. L. (2001). Brain activities in an expert versus a novice artist: An fMRI study. Leonardo, 34, 31–34.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. (2002). “Creativity as decision”: Comment. American Psychologist, 57, 376.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R.J., & Lubart, T.I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stevenson-Taylor, A. G., & Mansell, W. (2012). Exploring the role of art-making in recovery, change, and self-understanding: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of interviews with everyday creative people. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 4(3), 104.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. W., & and Ellison, R. L. (1968). The Alpha Biographial Inventory. Greensboro, NC: Prediction Press.Google Scholar
Tinio, P. P. (2013). From artistic creation to aesthetic reception: The mirror model of art. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(3), 265–275.Google Scholar
Toku, M. (2001). Cross-cultural analysis of artistic development: Drawings by Japanese and U.S. children. Visual Arts Research, 27, 46–59.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (1966). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual. Princeton, NY: Personnel Press.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (1969). Curiosity of gifted children and performances on timed and untimed tests of creativity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 13, 155–158.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 43–75). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Torrance, E.P. (1999). Torrance Test of Creative Thinking: Norms and technical manual. Beaconville, IL: Scholastic Testing Services.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P., & Goff, K. (1989). A quiet revolution. Journal of Creative Behavior, 23, 136–145.Google Scholar
Urban, K. K. (1991). Recent trends in creativity research and theory in Western Europe. European Journal of High Ability, 1(1), 99–113.Google Scholar
Urban, K. K. (2004). Assessing creativity: The test for creative thinking-drawing production (TCT-DP) the concept, application, evaluation, and international studies. Psychology Science, 46(3), 387–397.Google Scholar
Urban, K. K., & Jellen, H. G. (1996). Test for Creative Thinking – Drawing Production (TCT-DP). Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Verstijnen, I. M., van Leeuwen, C., Goldschmidt, G., Hamel, R., & Hennessey, J. M. (1998). Creative discovery in imagery and perception: Combining is relatively easy, restructuring takes a sketch. Acta Psychologica, 99(2), 177–200.Google Scholar
Wallach, M., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Ward, T. B. (1994). Structured imagination: The role of category structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive psychology, 27(1), 1–40.Google Scholar
Weintraub, D., & Nirenberg, M. J. (2012). Impulse control and related disorders in Parkinson’s disease. Neurodegenerative Diseases, 11(2), 63–71.Google Scholar
Westphal-Fitch, G., Oh, J., & Fitch, W. (2013). Studying aesthetics with the method of production: Effects of context and local symmetry. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(1), 13–26.Google Scholar
Winner, E. (1989). Development in the visual arts. In Damon, W. (Ed.), Child development today and tomorrow (pp. 199–221). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, K. (1964). Experimental scoring manuals for the Minnesota test of creative thinking and writing. OH: Kent State University.Google Scholar
Zaidel, D. W. (2010). Art and brain: Insights from neuropsychology, biology and evolution. Journal of Anatomy, 216(2), 177–183.Google Scholar
Zaidel, D. W. (2014). Creativity, brain, and art: Biological and neurological considerations. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(389), 1–9.Google Scholar
Zaidel, D. W., Nadal, M., Flexas, A., & Munar, E. (2013). An evolutionary approach to art and aesthetic experience. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(1), 100.Google Scholar
References
Aguirre, G. K., Detre, J. A., Alsop, D. C., & D’Esposito, M. (1996). The parahippocampus subserves topographical learning in man. Cerebral Cortex, 6, 823–829.Google Scholar
Baird, J. C., Cassidy, B., & Kurr, J. (1978). Room preference as a function of architectural features and user activities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 719–727.Google Scholar
Bar, M., & Neta, M. (2006). Humans prefer curved visual objects. Psychological Science, 17, 645–648.Google Scholar
Bar, M., & Neta, M. (2007). Visual elements of subjective preference modulate amygdala activation. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2191–2200.Google Scholar
Barrett, L. F., Mesquita, B., Ochsner, K. N., & Gross, J. J. (2007). The experience of emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 373–403.Google Scholar
Barrett, L. F., & Wager, T. (2006). The structure of emotion: Evidence from the neuroimaging of emotion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 79–85.Google Scholar
Brown, S., Gao, X., Tisdelle, L., Eickhoff, S. B., & Liotti, M. (2011). Naturalizing aesthetics: Brain areas for aesthetic appraisal across sensory modalities. Neuroimage, 58, 250–258.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. P. (1971). Handbook for the strong vocational interest blank. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cavanna, A. E., & Trimble, M. R. (2006). The precuneus: A review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. Brain, 129, 564–583.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, A., & Vartanian, O. (2014). Neuroaesthetics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 370–375.Google Scholar
Epstein, R., & Kanwisher, N. (1998). A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature, 392, 598–601.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fich, L. B., Jönsson, P., Kirkegaard, P. H., Wallergård, , Garde, A. H., & Hansen, Å. (2014). Can architectural design alter the physiological reaction to psychosocial stress? A virtual TSST experiment. Physiology & Behavior, 135, 91–97.Google Scholar
Gazzaniga, M. S. (1998). The mind’s past. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gazzaniga, M. S. (2000). Cerebral specialization and interhemispheric communication: does the corpus callosum enable the human condition? Brain, 123, 1293–1326.Google Scholar
Gilbert, S. J., Zamenopoulos, T., Alexiou, K., & Johnson, J. H. (2009). Involvement of right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in ill-structured design cognition: An fMRI study. Brain Research, 1312, 79–88.Google Scholar
Gilhooly, K. J., Fiortou, E., Anthony, S. H., & Wynn, V. (2007). Divergent thinking: Strategies and executive involvement in generating novel uses for familiar objects. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 611–625.Google Scholar
Goel, V. (2014). Creative brains: Designing in the real world. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, Article 241.Google Scholar
Goel, V., & Grafman, J. (2000). The role of the right prefrontal cortex in ill-structured problem solving. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 415–436.Google Scholar
Goel, V., & Vartanian, O. (2005). Dissociating the roles of right ventral lateral and dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex in generation and maintenance of hypotheses in set-shift problems. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1170–1177.Google Scholar
Goldberg, E., Podell, K., & Lovell, M. (1994). Lateralization of frontal lobe functions and cognitive novelty. Journal of Neuropsychiatry, 6, 371–378.Google Scholar
Gough, H. A. (1956). California Psychological Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Hall, W. B., & MacKinnon, D. W. (1969). Personality inventory correlates of creativity among architects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 322–326.Google Scholar
Helson, R. (1999). Institute of Personality Assessment and Research. In Runco, M. A. & Pritzker, S. R. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 71–79). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kirsch, C., Lubart, T., & Houssemand, C. (2016). Creativity in student architects: Multivariate approach. In Corazza, G. E. & Agnoli, S. (Eds.), Multidisciplinary contributions to the science of creative thinking (pp. 175–194). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
Klepeis, N. E., Nelson, W. C., Ott, W. R., Robinson, J. P. Tsang, A. M., Switzer, P., Behar, J. W., Hern, S. C., & Engelmann, W. H. (2001). The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): A resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology, 11, 231–252.Google Scholar
Kravitz, D. J., Saleem, K. S., Baker, C. I., & Mishkin, M. (2011). A new neural framework for visuospatial processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12, 217–230.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, D. W. (1962). The nature and nurture of creative talent. American Psychologist, 17, 484–495.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, D. W. (1965). Personality and the realization of creative potential. American Psychologist, 20, 273–281.Google Scholar
Mishkin, M., Ungerleider, L. G., & Macko, K. (1983). Object vision and spatial vision. Trends in Neurosciences, 6, 414–417.Google Scholar
Nobre, A. C., Sebestyen, G. N., Gitelman, D. R., Mesulam, M. M., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Frith, C. D. (1997). Functional localization of the system form visuospatial attention using positron emission tomography. Brain, 120, 515–533.Google Scholar
Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2011). Are intelligence and creativity really so different?: Fluid intelligence, executive processes, and strategy use in divergent thinking. Intelligence, 39, 36–45.Google Scholar
Ott, W. R. (1989). Human activity patterns: A review of the literature for estimating time spent indoors, outdoors, and in transit. Proceedings of the Research Planning Conference on Human Activity Patterns, EPA National Exposure Research Laboratory, EPA/600/4–89/004: Las Vegas, NV.Google Scholar
Poldrack, R. (2006). Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 59–63.Google Scholar
Rutherford, H. J. V., & Lindell, A. K. (2011). Thriving and surviving: Approach and avoidance motivation and lateralization. Emotion Review, 3, 333–343.Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J., & Barona, C. M. (2009). Do people prefer curved objects? Angularity, expertise, and aesthetic preference. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 27, 25–42.Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Willse, J. T., Barona, C. M., Cram, J. T., Hess, K. I., Martinez, J. L., & Richard, C. A. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: Exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 68–85.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (1999). Handbook of creativity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Terman, L. M. (1956). Concept mastery test, form T manual. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In Ingle, D. J., Goodale, M. A., & Mansfield, R. J. W. (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549–586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Urban, K. K., & Jellen, H. G. (1996). TCT-DP: Test for creative thinking-drawing production. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Vartanian, O., & Goel, V. (2005). Task constraints modulate activation in right ventral lateral prefrontal cortex. Neuroimage, 27, 927–933.Google Scholar
Vartanian, O., Navarrete, G., Chatterjee, A., Fich, L. B., Gonzalez-Mora, J. L., Leder, H., Modroño, C., Nadal, M., Rostrup, N., & Skov, M. (2015). Architectural design and the brain: Effects of ceiling height and perceived enclosure on beauty judgments and approach-avoidance decisions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 41, 10–18.Google Scholar
Vartanian, O., Navarrete, G., Chatterjee, A., Fich, L. B., Leder, H., Modroño, C., Nadal, M., Rostrup, N., & Skov, M. (2013). Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions in architecture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 110 (Suppl. 2), 10446–10453.Google Scholar
Vartanian, O., Vartanian, A., Beaty, R. E., Nusbaum, E. C., Silvia, P. J., Blackler, K., Lam, Q, & Peele, E. (2014). Revered today, loved tomorrow: Expert creativity ratings predict popularity of architects 50 years later. In Kozbelt, A. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-third Biennial Congress of the International Association of Empirical Aesthetics (pp. 47–51).Google Scholar
Watson, C. E., Cardillo, E. R., Ianni, G. R., & Chatterjee, A. (2013). Action concepts in the brain: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 1191–1205.Google Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (2011). Frank Lloyd Wright’s Fallingwater: A case study in inside-the-box creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 23, 296–311.Google Scholar
References
Adams, A. (2007). Introduction. “You don’t take a photograph, you make it.” In Jaeger, A.-C. (Ed.) Image makers, image takers: Interviews with today’s leading curators, editors, and photographers (pp. 6–12). New York, NY: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Aschermann, E., Dannenberg, U., & Schulz, A.-P. (1998). Photographs as Retrieval Cues for Children. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12, 55–66.Google Scholar
Axelsson, Ö. (2007). Towards a psychology of photography: Dimensions underlying aesthetic appeal of photographs. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 105, 411–434.Google Scholar
Back, M. D., Stopfer, J. M., Vazire, S., Gaddis, S., Schmukle, S. C., Egloff, B., & Gosling, S. D. (2010). Facebook profiles reflect actual personality, not self-idealization. Psychological Science, 21(3), 372–374.Google Scholar
Bayles, D. & Orland, T. (2001). Art & Fear: Observations on the Perils (and Rewards) of Artmaking. Santa Barbara, CA: Image Continuum Press.Google Scholar
Beilin, H. (1991). Developmental aesthetics and the psychology of photography. In Downs, R. M., Liben, L. S. & Palermo, D. S. (Eds.), Visions of aesthetics, the environment and development. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum Assoc. Publishers.Google Scholar
Berger, J. (1980). Uses of photography. In Berger, J. (Ed.), About looking. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Berger, J. (2013). Appearances. In Berger, J. (Ed.), Understanding a photograph (1982). New York: Aperture.Google Scholar
Bernat, E., Patrick, C. J., Benning, S. D., & Tellegen, A. (2006). Effects of picture content and intensity on affective physiological response. Psychophysiology, 43, 93–103.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1962). The conditions of creativity. In Gruber, H. E., Terrell, G., & Wertheimer, M. (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to creative thinking: A symposium held at the University of Colorado. The Atherton Press behavioral science series. New York, NY: Atherton Press.Google Scholar
Burke, P. A., & Dollinger, S. J. (2005). “A picture’s worth a thousand words”: Language use in the autophotographic essay. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 536–548.Google Scholar
Carroll, H. (2014). Read this if you want to take great photographs. London: Laurence King Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Cartier-Bresson, H. (1999). The mind’s eye writings on photography and photographers. Millerton, N.Y: Aperture.Google Scholar
Casey, P. F., & Dollinger, S. J. (2007). College students’ alcohol-related problems: An autophotographic approach. Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 51(2), 8–25.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, A. (2013). The aesthetic brain: How we evolved to desire beauty and enjoy art 1st edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Christofides, E., Muise, A., Desmarais, S. (2009). Information disclosure and control on Facebook: Are they two sides of the same coin or two different processes? Cyberpsychol Behavior 12(3):341–345.Google Scholar
Cleveland, P. (2005). How much visual power can a magazine take? Design Studies, 26, 271–317.Google Scholar
Combs, J. M., & Ziller, R. C. (1977). Photographic self-concept of counselees. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 452–455.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J. (1996). Autophotographic identities of young adults: With special reference to alcohol, athletics, achievement, religion and work. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67, 384–398.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J. (2001). Religious identity: An autophotographic study. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 11, 71–92.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J. (2003). Need for uniqueness, need for cognition, and creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 37, 99–116.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J. (2006). Autophotographic individuality predicts creativity: A seven-year follow-up. Journal of Creative Behavior, 40, 111–124.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J. (2007). Creativity and conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1025–1035.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J. (2011). “Standardized minds” or individuality? Admissions tests and creativity revisited. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 329–341.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J. (2016). “You are as you read”: Do students’ reading interests contribute to their individuality? Reading Psychology, 37, 1–26.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J. (2017). Much more than selfies: Autophotography, individuality, and creativity. In Feist, G. J., Reiter-Palmon, R., and Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity and personality research (pp. 323–354). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J., Burke, P. A., & Gump, N. (2007). Creativity and values. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 91–103.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J., & Clancy, S. M. (1993). Identity, self, and personality. II: Glimpses through the autophotographic eye. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 1064–1071.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J., & Dollinger, S. M. C. (1997). Individuality and identity exploration: An autophotographic study. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 337–354.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J., & Dollinger, S. M. C. (2003). Individuality in young and middle adulthood: An autophotographic study. Journal of Adult Development, 10, 227–236.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J., Preston, L. A., O’Brien, S. P., & DiLalla, D. L. (1996). Individuality and relatedness of the self: An autophotographic study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1268–1278.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J., Robinson, N. M., & Ross, V. J. (1999). Photographic individuality, breadth of perspective, and creativity. Journal of Personality, 67, 623–644.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J., Ross, V. J., & Preston, L. A. (2002). Intellect and individuality. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 213–226.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J., Urban, K.K., & James, T. A. (2004). Creativity and openness: Further validation of two creative product measures. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 35–47.Google Scholar
Domino, G., & Giuliani, I. (2007). Creativity in three samples of photographers: A validation of the Adjective Check List Creativity scale. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 193–200.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. (1965). Differential communication of affect by head and body cues. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 726–735.Google Scholar
Endsley, M. R. (2006). Expertise and situation awareness. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J., & Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fayena-Tawil, F., Kozbelt, A., & Sitaras, L. (2011). Think global, act local: A protocol analysis comparison of artists’ and nonartists’ cognitions, metacognitions, and evaluations while drawing. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 135–145.Google Scholar
Feltovich, P. J., Prietula, M. J., Ericsson, K. A. (2006). Studies of expertise from psychological perspectives. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J., & Hoffman, R.R. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 41–67). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fleenor, J. W., & Taylor, S. (2004). The assessment of creativity. In Hersen, M. (Ed.), Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment (pp. 75–84). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Focal Power (2009). The Photo Quotes Archive. Retrieved on August 10, 2009, from www.focalpower.com/app/quote/subjects/Google Scholar
Gampat, C. (2014, December 23). How to pick one photo out of several thousand: An inside look at how we judge photo contests. Retrieved on May 3, 2015, from www.thephoblographer.com/2014/12/23/pick-one-photo-several-thousand-inside-look-judge-photo-contests/#.VUaFB5MYPe5Google Scholar
Garry, M., & Wade, K. A. (2005). Actually, a picture is worth less than 45 words: Narratives produce more false memories than photographs do. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(2), 359–366.Google Scholar
Getzels, J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Ginicola, M. M., Smith, C., & Trzaska, J. (2012). Counseling through images: Using photography to guide the counseling process and achieve treatment goals. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 7, 310–329.Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2010). Principles for a cultural psychology of creativity. Culture Psychology, 16(2), 147–163.Google Scholar
Gosling, S.D., Augustine, A.A., Vazire, S., Holtzman, N., and Gaddis, S. (2011). Manifestations of personality in Online Social Networks: Self-reported Facebook-related behaviors and observable profile information. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 14(9), 483–488.Google Scholar
Halsman, P. (1961). Halsman of the creation of photographic ideas. New York: Ziff-Davis.Google Scholar
Hattersley, R. (1962). A handy kit for do-it-yourself critics. In Traub, C. H., Heller, S., and Bell, A. B. (Eds.), The education of a photographer (pp. 194–198). New York, NY: Allsworth Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins (undated). Elements of a merit image. Retrieved on May 3, 2015, from www.ppa.com/article.cfm?ItemNumber=1901.Google Scholar
Henry, W. P., & Solano, C. H. (1983). Photographic style and personality: Developing a coding system for photographs. Journal of Psychology, 115, 79–87.Google Scholar
Hekkert, P., & Van Wieringen, P. C. W. (1996). Beauty in the eye of expert and nonexpert beholders: A study in the appraisal of art. American Journal of Psychology, 109, 389–407.Google Scholar
Herpertz, S. C., Kunert, H. J. Schwenger, U. B., & Sass, H. (1999). Affective responsiveness in borderline personality disorder: A psychophysiological approach. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 1550–1556.Google Scholar
Hurn, D., & Jay, B. (2008). On being a photographer: a practical guide. Anacortes, WA: LensWork Publishing.Google Scholar
Ivcevic, Z., & Ambady, N. (2013). Face to (face)book: The two faces of social behavior? Journal of Personality, 81(3), 290–301.Google Scholar
Jaeger, AC. (2007). Image makers, image takers: Interviews with today’s leading curators, editors and photographers. New York: NY: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Karl, K., Peluchette, J., & Schlaegel, C. (2010). Who’s posting Facebook faux pas? A cross-cultural examination of personality differences. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18(2), 174–186.Google Scholar
Kaslow, F. W., & Friedman, J. (1977). Utilization of family photos and movies in family therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 3, 19–25.Google Scholar
Kozbelt, A. (2006). Dynamic evaluation of Matisse’s 1935 “Large Reclining Nude.” Empirical Studies of the Arts, 24, 119–137.Google Scholar
Kozbelt, A. (2008). Longitudinal hit ratios of classical composers: Reconciling Darwinian and expertise acquisition perspectives on lifespan creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 221–235.Google Scholar
Kozbelt, A., & Serafin, J. (2009). Dynamic evaluation of high- and low-creativity drawings by artist and non-artist raters. Creativity Research Journal, 21, 349–360.Google Scholar
Kulich, R. J., & Goldberg, R.W. (1978). Differences in the production of photographs: A potential assessment technique. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47(1), 223–229.Google Scholar
Lavretiev, A. (1994). Inventions from photography: Light, shadow and optical transformations. Leonardo, 27(5), 383–386.Google Scholar
Mahaffey, A. L., Bryan, A., & Hutchison, K. E. (2005). Using startle eye blink to measure the affective component of anti-gay bias. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 37–45.Google Scholar
Marcus, B., Machilek, F., Schütz, A. (2006). Personality in cyberspace: Personal web sites as media for personality expressions and impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(6), 1014–1031.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. (1994). How can we measure a society’s creativity? In Boden, M. A. (Ed.), Dimensions of creativity (pp. 159–198). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. E. (1999). Fifty years of creativity research. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 449–460). Cambridge: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
McManus, I. C., Zhou, F. A., I’Anson, S., Waterfield, L., Stover, K., & Cook, R. (2011). The psychometrics of photographing cropping: The influence of colour, meaning, and expertise. Perception, 40, 332–357.Google Scholar
Milgram, S. (1977). The image freezing machine. In Milgram, S. (Ed.), The individual in a social world: Essays and experiments (pp. 339–350). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Navab, A. D. (2001). Re-picturing of photography: A language in the making. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 35(1), 69–84.Google Scholar
Nuhn (2011, April 25). Five factors that judges consider in reviewing photo contest entries. National Wildlife. Retrieved on May 3, 2015, from www.nwf.org/news-and-magazines/national-wildlife/photozone/archives/2011/5-photo-judging-factors.aspxGoogle Scholar
Pennebaker, J. W., Francis, M. E., & Booth, R. J. (2001). Linguistic inquiry and word count (LIWC): LIWC2001 [Computer software and manual]. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Perlson, H. (2015, April 10). “Spying” artist wins privacy case. Artnet News. Retrieved on July 13, 2015, from https://news.artnet.com/art-world/arne-svenson-neighbors-photographs-supreme-court-286916.Google Scholar
PhotoWings (undated). Interview: Sandra Phillips, senior curator of photography at the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art. Retrieved on August 23, 2015, from http://photowings.org/interview-sandra-phillips-senior-curator-of-photography-at-the-san-francisco-museum-of-modern-art/.Google Scholar
Quinn, S. (2015, Jan 27). Eyetracking photojournalism: New research explores what makes a photograph memorable, shareable, and worth publishing. NPPA The Voice of Visual Journalists. Retrieved on August 23, 2015, from https://nppa.org/news/eyetracking-photojournalism-new-research-explores-what-makes-photograph-memorable-shareable-and.Google Scholar
Read, S. (2013). Exhibiting photography: A practical guide to displaying your work, second edition., Burlington, MA: Focal Press.Google Scholar
Risch, C. (2014, February 7). MoMA’s new chief photo Curator turns to studio photography for first show. Retrieved on August 23, 2015, from http://www.pdnonline.com/features/MoMAs-New-Chief-Pho-10291.shtml.Google Scholar
Rodden, K. & Wood, K. R. (2003). How do people manage their digital photographs? In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (pp. 409–416), New York, NY: ACM.Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Explaining creativity. The science of human innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schacter, D. L., Koutstaal, W., Johnson, M. K., Gross, M. S., & Angell, K. E. (1997). False recollection induced by photographs: A comparison of older and younger adults. Psychology and Aging, 12, 203–215.Google Scholar
Serafin, J. (2013). Expertise in artistic photography. Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy, The Graduate Center of the City University of New York. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 74(6-B)(E), 2013. Accession number: 2013–99241–028.Google Scholar
Shore, S. (2007). The nature of photographs (2nd edn.). London: Phaidon Press Limited.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1997). Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career landmarks and trajectories. Psychological Review, 104, 66–89.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2011). Creativity and discovery as blind variation and selective retention: Multiple-variant definitions and blind-sighted integration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(3), 222–228.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2012). Quantifying creativity: Can measures span the spectrum? Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 14(1), 100–104.Google Scholar
Solso, R. L. (2001). Brain activities in a skilled versus a novice artist: An fMRI study. Leonardo, 34, 31–34.Google Scholar
Szarkowski, J. (1973). Looking at photographs: 100 pictures from the Museum of Modern Art. New York: The Museum of Modern Art.Google Scholar
The Coming World of Photography (1944). Popular photography. Retrieved on July 10, 2015, from https://people.rit.edu/andpph/giants/POP-PHOTO-future-1944.html.Google Scholar
Thein, M. (2012a). What makes an outstanding image? Retrieved on July 10, 2015, from http://blog.mingthein.com/2012/10/06/outstanding-1/.Google Scholar
Thein, M. (2012b). The process of editing. Retrieved on July 10, 2015, from http://blog.mingthein.com/2012/04/20/the-process-of-editing/.Google Scholar
Tinio, P. P. L., & Leder, H. (2013). The means to art’s end: Styles, creative devices, and the challenge of art. In Bristol, A. S., Kaufman, J. C., & Vartanian, O. (Eds.), The neuroscience of creativity. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tinio, P. P. L., Leder, H., & Strasser, M., (2011). Image quality and the aesthetic judgment of photographs: Contrast, sharpness, and grain teased apart and put together. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(2), 165–176.Google Scholar
Tinio, P. P. L., & Leder, H. (2009). Natural scenes are indeed preferred, but image quality might have the last word. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, 52–56.Google Scholar
Vidulich, R. N., & Krevanick, F. W. (1966). Racial attitudes and emotional response to visual representations of the Negro. Journal of Social Psychology, 68, 85–93.Google Scholar
Walker, J. L. (1991). Photograph as lifeline – Facing mortality. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 45, 124–128.Google Scholar
Wignall (2009, October 12). National Geographic’s Jim Richardson: How I judge photo contests. Retrieved on May 3, 2015, from http://rising.blackstar.com/national-geographics-jim-richardson-how-i-judge-photo-contests.html.Google Scholar
Yu, C. (2004). Aesthetics of photography: Combining the viewer’s and the artist’s standpoints. Art Criticism, 19(1), 63–74.Google Scholar
Zago, M., McIntyre, J., Senot, P., & Lacquaniti, F. (2009). Visuo-motor coordination and internal models for object interception. Experimental Brain Research, 192(4), 571–604.Google Scholar
Zehr (2009). Creating the “other” in research, photography, justice. Retrieved on July 10, 2015, from http://emu.edu/now/restorative-justice/2009/09/30/creating-the-other-in-research-photography-justice.Google Scholar
Zebrowitz, L. A., Hall, J. A., Murphy, N. A., & Rhodes, G. (2002). Looking smart and looking good: Facial cues to intelligence and their origins. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 238–249.Google Scholar
Ziller, R. C. (1977). A phenomenological utilization of photographs. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 7, 172–182.Google Scholar
Ziller, R. C., & Lewis, D. C. (1981). Orientations: Self, social, and environmental percepts through auto-photography. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 338–343.Google Scholar
Ziller, R. C., & Rorer, B. A. (1985). Shyness-environment interaction: A view from the shy side through auto-photography. Journal of Personality, 53, 626–639.Google Scholar
Zillmann, D., Gibson, R., & Sargent, S. L. (1999). Effects of photographs in news-magazine reports on issue perception. Media Psychology, 1, 207–228.Google Scholar
References
Arnold, N. (1991). The manipulation of the audience by the director and actor. Psychology and Performing Arts, 75–81.Google Scholar
Beghetto, R. A. (2007). Does creativity have a place in classroom discussions? Prospective teachers response preferences. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
Benedetti, J. (2007). The art of the actor: The essential history of acting, from classical times to the present day. New York: Theatre Arts Book.Google Scholar
Caine, M. (2000). Acting in film: An actor’s take on movie making. Hal Leonard Corporation.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). In Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. S. (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 15–35). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikzentmihaly, M. (1991). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience (Vol. 41). New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Dempsey, A. (2010). Styles, schools and movements: The essential encyclopaedic guide to modern art. Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Dixon, M. B., & Smith, J. A. (1995). Anne Bogart: Viewpoints. Smith & Kraus Pub Incorporated.Google Scholar
Goldstein, T. R., & Bloom, P. (2011). The mind onstage: Why cognitive scientists should study acting. Trends in Cognitive Science, 15, 141–142.Google Scholar
Goldstein, T. R., & Winner, E. (2009). Living in alternative and inner worlds: Early signs of acting talent. Creativity Research Journal, 21(1), 117–124.Google Scholar
Goldstein, T. R., & Winner, E. (2010). Engagement in role play, pretense, and acting classes predict advanced theory of mind skill in middle childhood. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 30(3), 249–258.Google Scholar
Goldstein, T. R., & Winner, E. (2012). Enhancing empathy and theory of mind. Journal of Cognition and Development, 13(1), 19–37.Google Scholar
Goldstein, T. R., Tamir, M., & Winner, E. (2013). Expressive suppression and acting classes. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(2), 191.Google Scholar
Goodman, G., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Gremlins in my head: Predicting stage fright in elite actors. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 32, 133–148.Google Scholar
Hull, S. L. (1985). Strasberg’s method as taught by Lorrie hull: A practical guide for actors, teachers, and directors. Ox Bow Pub.Google Scholar
Kogan, N. (2002). Careers in the performing arts: A psychological perspective. Communication Research Journal, 14(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
Konijn, E. A. (1991). Empirical analysis of emotion processes in the theatre. Psychology and Performing Arts, 59.Google Scholar
Konijn, E. A. (2000). Acting emotions: Shaping emotions on stage. Leiden University Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, D. (1955). Morning Advocate, The Lyons Den by Leonard Lyons (Syndicated), Quote Page 4A, Column 2, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.Google Scholar
Martin, J. J., & Cutler, K. (2002). An exploratory study of flow and motivation in theater actors. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 14, 344–352.Google Scholar
Nemiro, J. (1997). Interpretive artists: A qualitative exploration of the creative process of actors. Creativity Research Journal, 10(2–3), 229–239.Google Scholar
Nettle, D. (2006). Psychological profiles of professional actors. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(2), 375–383.Google Scholar
Noice, T., & Noice, H. (1997). The nature of expertise in professional acting: A cognitive view. Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Panero, M. E., Goldstein, T. R., Rosenberg, R. Hughes, H., & Winner, E. (in press). Do actors posses traits associated with high hypnotizability? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts.Google Scholar
Poyatos, F. (2002). Nonverbal communication across disciplines: Paralanguage, kinesics, silence, personal and environmental interaction (Vol. 2). John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
Russ, S. W., Robins, A. L., & Christiano, B. A. (1999). Pretend play: Longitudinal prediction of creativity and affect in fantasy in children. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 129–139.Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. K. (2012). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. K. (2014). Group creativity: Music, theater, collaboration. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Schellenberg, E. G. (2004). Music lessons enhance IQ. Psychological Science, 15(8), 511.Google Scholar
Schwartz, G. (2012). Viola Spolin. Retrieved on September 23, 2015, from www.spolin.com/?p=864.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, W. (2008). Hamlet, The Norton Shakespeare. NY, NY. (Original work published 1699).Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2004). Group artistic creativity: Creative clusters and cinematic success in feature films1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(7), 1494–1520.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2009). Cinematic success criteria and their predictors: The art and business of the film industry. Psychology & Marketing, 26(5), 400–420.Google Scholar
Spolin, V. (1999). Improvisation for the theater: A handbook of teaching and directing techniques. Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Thomson, P., & Jaque, S. (2011). Testimonial theatre-making: Establishing or dissociating the self. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(3), 229.Google Scholar
Thomson, P., & Jaque, S. (2012). Holding a mirror up to nature: Psychological vulnerability in actors. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 361–369.Google Scholar
Thomson, P., Keehn, E. B., & Gumpel, T. P. (2009). Generators and interpreters in a performing arts population: Dissociation, trauma, fantasy proneness, and affective states. Creativity Research Journal, 21(1), 72–91. DOI:10.1080/10400410802633533Google Scholar
Worthen, W. B. (1996). The Harcourt brace anthology of drama. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
References
Aranosian, C. M. (1981). Musical creativity: The stream of consciousness in composition, improvisation and education. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 1, 67–88.Google Scholar
Baer, J. (2010). Is creativity domain specific? In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 321–341). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Bridging generality and specificity: The Amusement Park Theoretical (APT) model of creativity. Roeper Review, 27, 158–163.Google Scholar
Bamberger, J. (1977) In search of a tune. In Perkins, D. and Leondar, B. (Eds.), The arts and cognition (pp. 284–389). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Barrington, D. (1770). Account of a very remarkable young musician. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 60, 4–64.Google Scholar
Bennett, S. (1976). The process of musical creation: interviews with eight composers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 24, 3–13.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1979/1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Originally published in 1979 by Les Éditions de Minuit, Paris, as La Distinction: Critique sociale du jugement.Google Scholar
Brattico, E., & Pearce, M. (2013). The neuroaesthetics of music. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 7, 48–61.Google Scholar
Brattico, E., & Tervaniemi, M. (2010). Creativity in musicians: Evidence from cognitive neuroscience. In Bader, R., Neuhaus, C., & Morgenstern, U. (Eds.), Concepts, experiments and fieldwork: Studies in systematic musicology and ethnomusicology (pp. 233–244). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Burnard, P., & Younker, B.A. (2002). Mapping pathways: Fostering creativity in composition. Music Education Research, 4, 245–261.Google Scholar
Burnard, P. (2012). Musical creativities in practice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, D.T. (1960). Blind generation and selective retention in creative thought as in other thought processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380–400.Google Scholar
Charness, N., Clifton, J., & MacDonald, L. (1988). Case study of a mono-musical savant. In Obler, L. K. & Fein, D. A. (Eds.), The exceptional brain: Neuropsychology of talent and special abilities (pp. 277–293). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, E. (2012). Creativity in performance. In Hargreaves, D. J., Miell, D. E., & MacDonald, R. A. R. (Eds.), Musical imaginations: Multidisciplinary perspectives on creativity, performance, and reception (pp. 17–30). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, D. (2005). A synthesis process model of creative thinking in music composition. Psychology of Music, 33, 193–216.Google Scholar
Collins, D. (2007). Real-time tracking of the creative music composition process. Digital Creativity Journal, 18, 239–256.Google Scholar
Collins, D. (Ed.). (2012). The act of musical composition: Studies in the creative process. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Cook, N. (2012). Beyond creativity? In Hargreaves, D. J., Miell, D. E., & MacDonald, R. A. R. (Eds.), Musical imaginations: Multidisciplinary perspectives on creativity, performance, and perception (pp. 452–459). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, B. (1990). Beethoven and the creative process. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 325–228). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, L., & Welsh, P. (1988). From collections to structure: The developmental path of tonal thinking. In Sloboda, J. A. (Ed.), Generative processes in music: The psychology of performance, improvisation and composition (pp. 260–285). Oxford: Oxford Science Publications.Google Scholar
Dennis, W. (1966). Creative productivity between the ages of 20 and 80 years. Journal of Gerontology, 9, 175–178.Google Scholar
Dissanayake, E. (2007). What art is and what art does: An overview of contemporary evolutionary hypotheses. In Martindale, C., Locher, P., & Petrov, V. M. (Eds.), Evolutionary and neurocognitive approaches to aesthetics, creativity, and the arts (pp. 1–14). Amityville, NY: Baywood.Google Scholar
Donin, N. (2012). Empirical and historical musicologies of compositional processes: Towards a cross-fertilisation. In Collins, D. (Ed.), The act of musical composition: Studies in the creative process (pp. 1–26). Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. (1999). Creative expertise as superior reproducible performance: Innovative and flexible aspects of expert performance. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 329–333.Google Scholar
Ericssson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Feist, G. J. (2004). The evolved fluid specificity of human creative talent. In Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Singer, J. L. (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 57–82). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Feist, G. J. (2007). An evolutionary model of artistic and musical creativity. In Martindale, C., Locher, P., & Petrov, V. M. (Eds.), Evolutionary and neurocognitive approaches to aesthetics, creativity, and the arts (pp. 15–30). Amityville, NY, Baywood.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. B. (1995). Musical prodigies: Masters at an early age. New York: Association Press.Google Scholar
Folkestad, G. (2012). Digital tools and discourse in music: The ecology of composition. In Hargreaves, D. J., Miell, D. E., & MacDonald, R. A. R. (Eds.), Musical imaginations: Multidisciplinary perspectives on creativity, performance, and reception (pp. 193–205). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, M. B. (2001). The artist speaks: Sigmund Koch on aesthetics and creative work. American Psychologist, 56, 445–452.Google Scholar
Freeman, W. (2000). A neurobiological role of music in social bonding. In Wallin, N. L., Merkur, S., & Brown, S. (Eds.), The origins of music (pp. 411–424). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gabora, L. (2000). Toward a theory of creative inklings. In Ascott, R. (Ed.), Art, technology, and consciousness (pp. 159–164). Bristol, UK: Intellect Press.Google Scholar
Galenson, D. W. (2006). Old masters and young geniuses: The two life cycles of artistic creativity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gjerdingen, R. O. (1988). A classic turn of phrase: Music and the psychology of convention. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J., & Vrba, E. S. (1982). Exaptation: A missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology, 8, 4–15.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, D. J., Hargreaves, J. J., & North, A. C. (2012). Imagination and creativity in music listening. In Hargreaves, D. J., Miell, D. E., & MacDonald, R. A. R. (Eds.), Musical imaginations: Multidisciplinary perspectives on creativity, performance, and perception (pp. 156–172). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hass, R. W., & Weisberg, R. W. (2009). Career development in two seminal American songwriters: A test of the equal odds rule. Creativity Research Journal, 21, 183–190.Google Scholar
Hass, R. W., & Weisberg, R. W. (2015). Revisiting the 10-year rule for composers from the Great American Songbook: On the validity of two measures of creative production. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 471–479.Google Scholar
Hayes, J. R. (1989). Cognitive processes in creativity. In Glover, J. A., Roning, R. R., & Reynolds, C. R. (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 202–219). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Higham, T., Basell, L., Jacobi, R., Wood, R., Ramsey, C. B., & Conard, N. J. (2012). Τesting models for the beginnings of the Aurignacian and the advent of figurative art and music: The radiocarbon chronology of Geißenklösterle. Journal of Human Evolution, 62, 664–676.Google Scholar
Humdrum (2015, November 9). Retrieved on November 9, 2015, from http://www.humdrum.org/Google Scholar
Huron, D. (2006). Sweet anticipation: Music and the psychology of expectation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Justus, T., & Hutsler, J. J. (2005). Fundamental issues in the evolutionary psychology of music: Assessing innateness and domain specificity. Music Perception, 23, 1–27.Google Scholar
Katz, S. L., & Gardner, H. (2012). Musical materials or metaphorical models? A psychological investigation of what inspires composers. In Hargreaves, D. J., Miell, D. E., & Macdonald, R. A. R. (Eds.), Musical imaginations: Multidisciplinary perspectives on creativity, performance, and perception (pp. 107–123). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kenneson, C. (2003). Musical prodigies: Perilous journeys, remarkable lives. Portland, OR: Amadeus Press.Google Scholar
Konečni, V. J. (2012). Composers’ creative processes: The role of life-events, emotion and reason. In Hargreaves, D. J., Miell, D. E., & Macdonald, R. A. R. (Eds.), Musical imaginations: Multidisciplinary perspectives on creativity, performance, and perception (pp. 141–155). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kozbelt, A. (2005). Factors affecting aesthetic success and improvement in creativity: A case study of the musical genres of Mozart. Psychology of Music, 33, 235–255.Google Scholar
Kozbelt, A. (2007). A quantitative analysis of Beethoven as self-critic: Implications for psychological theories of musical creativity. Psychology of Music, 35, 147–172.Google Scholar
Kozbelt, A. (2008a). Longitudinal hit ratios of classical composers: Reconciling “Darwinian” and expertise acquisition perspectives on lifespan creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 221–235.Google Scholar
Kozbelt, A. (2008b). One-hit wonders in classical music: Evidence and (partial) explanations for an early career peak. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 179–195.Google Scholar
Kozbelt, A. (2011). Age and aesthetic significance in classical music: A multi-level reanalysis of Halsey’s (1976) ratings. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 29, 129–148.Google Scholar
Kozbelt, A. (2012). Process, self-evaluation, and lifespan creativity trajectories in eminent composers. In Collins, D. (Ed.), The act of musical composition: Studies in the creative process (pp. 27–51). Farnham, UK: Ashgate Press.Google Scholar
Kozbelt, A. (2014). Musical creativity across the lifespan. In Simonton, D. K. (Ed.), Handbook of genius (pp. 451–472). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kozbelt, A., Beghetto, R., & Runco, M. A. (2010). Theories of creativity. In Kaufman, J. C & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 20–47). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kozbelt, A., & Meredith, D. (2010). A note on trans-historical melodic originality trends in classical music. International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 20, 109–125.Google Scholar
Lehmann, A. C., & Gruber, H. (2006). Music. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J., & Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 457–470). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levitin, D. J. (2009). The world in six songs: How the musical brain created human nature. London: Plume.Google Scholar
Levitin, D. J., & Bellugi, U. (1998). Musical abilities in individuals with Williams syndrome. Music Perception, 15, 357–389.Google Scholar
MacDonald, R. A. R., Byrne, C., & Carlton, L. (2006). Creativity and flow in music composition: An empirical investigation. Psychology of Music, 34, 292–307.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. (1990). The clockwork muse: The predictability of artistic change. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. (2009). The evolution and end of art as Hegelian tragedy. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 27, 133–140.Google Scholar
McAdams, S. (2004). Problem-solving strategies in music composition: A case study. Music Perception, 21, 391–429.Google Scholar
Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.Google Scholar
Meredith, D., & Kozbelt, A. (2014). Ascending/descending melodic interval asymmetry in Arnold Schoenberg’s vocal music: Implications for trans-historical creativity. In Kozbelt, A. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Biennial Congress of the International Association of Empirical Aesthetics [CD-ROM] (pp. 505–509). New York, NY: IAEA.Google Scholar
Miller, G. F. (2000a). Evolution of human music through sexual selection. In Wallin, N. L., Merker, B., & Brown, S. (Eds.), The origins of music (pp. 329–360). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Miller, G. F. (2001). Aesthetic fitness: How sexual selection shaped artistic virtuosity as a fitness indicator and aesthetic preferences as mate choice criteria. Bulletin of Psychology and the Arts, 2, 20–25.Google Scholar
Murray, C. (2003). Human accomplishment: The pursuit of excellence in the arts and sciences, 800 B.C. to 1950. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Music Industry. (2015, November 9). Retrieved on November 9, 2015, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Music_industry#Total_revenue_by_year.Google Scholar
Paisley, W. J. (1964). Identifying the unknown communicator in painting, literature, and music: The significance of minor encoding habits. Journal of Communication, 14, 219–237.Google Scholar
Pater, W. (1893/2010). Studies in the history of the Renaissance (4th edn.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Peretz, I. (2008). Musical disorders: From behavior to genes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 329–333.Google Scholar
Plucker, J. A. (1999). Is the proof in the pudding? Reanalyses of Torrance’s (1958 to present) longitudinal data. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 103–114.Google Scholar
Rodriguez Zivic, P. H., Shifres, F., & Cecchi, G. A. (2013). Perceptual basis of evolving Western musical styles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 10034–10038.Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, S. (2016). Musical extrapolations: Creative processes involved while music is being listened to and composed. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
Schubert, E. (2012). Spreading activation and dissociation: A cognitive mechanism for creative processing in music. In Hargreaves, D. J., Miell, D. E., & MacDonald, R. A. R. (Eds.), Musical imaginations: Multidisciplinary perspectives on creativity, performance, and reception (pp. 124–140). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1977). Creative productivity, age, and stress: A biographical time-series analysis of 10 classical composers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 791–804.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1980). Thematic fame, melodic originality, and musical zeitgeist: A biographical and transhistorical content analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 972–983.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1991). Emergence and realization of genius: The lives and works of 120 classical composers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 829–840.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1994). Computer content analysis of melodic structure: Classical composers and their compositions. Psychology of Music, 22, 31–43.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1997). Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career landmarks and trajectories. Psychological Review, 104, 66–89.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1999). Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creative development as acquired expertise: Theoretical issues and an empirical test. Developmental Review, 20, 283–318.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2007). Cinema composers: Career trajectories for creative productivity in film music. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 160–169.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2011). Creativity and discovery as blind variation: Campbell’s (1960) BVSR model after the half-century mark. Review of General Psychology, 15, 158–174.Google Scholar
Sloboda, J. A., O’Neill, S. A., & Ivaldi, A. (2001). Functions of music in everyday life: An exploratory study using the experience sampling method. Musicae Scientiae, 5, 9–32.Google Scholar
Solomon, M. (1980). On Beethoven’s creative process: A two-part invention. Music and Letters, 61, 272–283.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2009). Domain-generality versus domain-specificity of creativity. In Meusburger, P., Funke, J., & Wunder, E. (Eds.), Milieus of creativity: An interdisciplinary approach to spatiality of creativity (pp. 25–38). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Thomson, W. (1991). Schoenberg’s error. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In Barkow, J., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 19–136). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trehub, S. E. (2000). Human processing predispositions and musical universals. In Wallin, N. L., Merker, B., & Brown, S. (Eds.), The origins of music (pp. 427–448). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Trehub, S. E. (2003). The developmental origins of musicality. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 669–673.Google Scholar
Vallas, L. (1973). Claude Debussy: His life and works, trans. O’Brien, Marie and O’Brien, Grace. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Vartanian, O. (2009). Variable attention facilitates creative problem solving. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, 57–59.Google Scholar
Vos, P. G., & Troost, J. M. (1989). Ascending and descending melodic intervals: Statistical findings and their perceptual relevance. Music Perception, 6, 383–396.Google Scholar
Waddington, C. H. (1942). Canalization of development and the inheritance of acquired characters. Nature, 150, 563–565.Google Scholar
Wallin, N. L., Merker, B., & Brown, S. (Eds.). (2000). The origins of music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Webster, P. R. (1987). Conceptual bases for creative thinking in music. In Peery, J. C., Peery, I. C., & Draper, T. W. (Eds.), Music and child development (pp. 158–174). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (1999). Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theories. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 226–250). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (2006). Creativity: Understanding innovation in problem solving, science, invention, and the arts. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Younker, B. A., & Smith, W.H. (1996). Comparing and modelling musical thought processes of expert and novice composers. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 128, 25–35.Google Scholar
Zabelina, D., & Robinson, M. D. (2010). Creativity as flexible cognitive control. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4, 136–143.Google Scholar
References
Air, M. E. (2013). Psychological distress among dancers seeking outpatient treatment for musculoskeletal injury. Journal of Dance Medicine and Science, 17(3), 115–125. DOI: 10.12678/1089.313X.17.3.115Google Scholar
Alter, J. B. (1984). Creativity profile of university and conservatory dance students. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(2), 153–158. DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4802_8Google Scholar
Anderson, R., & Hanrahan, S. J. (2008). Dancing in pain: Pain appraisal and coping in dancers. Journal of Dance Medicine and Science, 12(1), 9–16.Google Scholar
Barker, K. K., Soklaridis, S., Waters, I., Herr, G., & Cassiday, J. D. (2009). Occupational strain and professional artists: A qualitative study of an underemployed group. Arts and Health: An International Journal for Research Policy and Practice, 1(2), 136–150.Google Scholar
Bennett, D. (2009). Academy and the real world: Developing realistic notions of career in the performing arts. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 8(3), 309–327. DOI: 10.1177/1474022209339953Google Scholar
Bernardis, P., & Gentilucci, M. (2006). Speech and gesture share the same communication system. Neuropsychologia, 44, 178–190. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.05.007Google Scholar
Blanchette, D. M., Ramocki, S. P., O’del, J. N., & Casey, M. S. (2005). Aerobic exercise and creative potential: Immediate and residual effects. Creativity Research Journal, 17(2 & 3), 257–264.Google Scholar
Bournelli, P., Makri, A., & Mylonas, K. (2009). Motor creativity and self-concept. Creativity Research Journal, 21(1), 104–110. DOI: 10.1080/10400410802633657Google Scholar
Brennan, M. A. (1982). Relationship between creative ability in dance and selected creative attributes. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 55, 47–56.Google Scholar
Brennan, M. A. (1983). Dance creativity measures: A reliability study. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 54(3), 293–295. DOI: 10.1080/02701367.1983.10605308Google Scholar
Brennan, M. A. (1985). Dance creativity tests and the structure-of-intellect model. Journal of Creative Behavior, 19(3), 185–190. DOI: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.1985.tb00657.xGoogle Scholar
Brown, D., & Wyon, M. (2014a). The effect of moderate glycemic energy bar consumption on blood glucose and mood in dancers. Medical Problems of Performing Artists, 29(1), 27–31.Google Scholar
Brown, D., & Wyon, M. (2014b). An international study on dietary supplementation use in dancers. Medical Problems of Performing Artists, 29(4), 229–234.Google Scholar
Chang, H. J., & Kuo, C. C. (2009). Overexcitabilities of gifted and talented students and its related research in Taiwan. Asia-Pacific Journal of Gifted and Talented Education, 1(1), 41–74.Google Scholar
Chaplin, L. N., & Norton, M. I. (2014). Why we think we can’t dance: Theory of mind and children’s desire to perform. Child Development, 86(2), 651–658. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12314Google Scholar
Chappell, K. (2007). The dilemmas of teaching for creativity: Insights from expert specialist dance teachers. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2, 39–56. DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2007.01.001Google Scholar
Clabaugh, A., & Morling, B. (2004). Stereotype accuracy of ballet and modern dancers. Journal of Social Psychology, 144(1), 31–48.Google Scholar
Coubard, O. A., Duretz, S., Lefebrve, V., Lapalus, P., & Ferrufino, L. (2011). Practice of contemporary dance improves cognitive flexibility in aging. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 3(13), 1–12. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2011.000013Google Scholar
Couillandre, A., Lewton-Brian, P., & Portero, P. (2008), Exploring the effects of kinesiological awareness and mental imagery on movement intention in the performance demi-plie. Journal of Dance Medicine and Science, 12(3), 91–98.Google Scholar
Christensen, J. F., & Calvo-Merino, B. (2013). Dance as a subject for empirical aesthetics. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(1), 76–88. DOI: 10.1037/a0031827Google Scholar
Cumming, J., & Duda, J. L. (2012). Profiles of perfectionism, body-related concerns, and indicators of psychological health in vocational dance students: An investigation of the 2 x 2 model of perfectionism. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13(6), 729–738. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.05.004Google Scholar
Dale, J. A., Hyatt, J., & Hollerman, J. (2007). The neuroscience of dance and the dance of neuroscience: Defining a path of inquiry. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 41(3), 89–110.Google Scholar
Dantas, A. G., & Quested, E. (2015). The effect of manipulated and accurate assessment feedback on the self-efficacy of dance students. Journal of Dance Medicine and Science, 19(1), 22–30.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, K., Kaschak, M. P., & Zwaan, R. A. (2007). Body posture facilitates retrieval of autobiographical memories. Cognition, 102(1), 139–149. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.12.009Google Scholar
Eusanio, J., Thomson, P., & Jaque, S. V. (2014). Perfectionism, shame, and self-concept in dancers: A mediation analysis. Journal of Dance Medicine and Science, 18(3), 106–114.Google Scholar
Fink, A., & Woschnjak, S. (2011). Creativity and personality in professional dancers. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 754–758. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.06.024Google Scholar
Fish, L., Hall, C., & Cumming, J. (2004). Investigating the use of imagery by elite ballet dancers. Avante, 10(3), 25–39.Google Scholar
Freedberg, D., & Gallese, V. (2007). Motion, emotion and empathy in esthetic experience. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11(5), 197–205. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.02.003Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2003). Embodied experience and linguistic meaning. Brain and Language, 84, 1–15.Google Scholar
Grove, J. R., Main, L. C., & Sharp, L. (2013). Stressors, recovery processes, and manifestations of training distress in dance. Journal of Dance Medicine and Science, 17(2), 70–78. DOI: 10.12678/1089.313X.17.2.70Google Scholar
Gruzelier, J. H., Thompson, T., Redding, E., Brandt, R., & Steffert, T. (2014). Application of alpha/theta neurofeedback and heart rate variability training to young contemporary dancers: State anxiety and creativity. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 93, 105–111. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.05.004Google Scholar
Hagood, T. K., & Kahlich, L. C. (2007). Research in choreography. In Bresler, L. (Ed.), International handbook of research in arts education (pp. 517–531), Vol. 16. The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Hamilton, L. H., & Robson, B. (2006). Performing arts consultation: Developing expertise in this domain. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 37(3), 254–259. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7028.37.3.254Google Scholar
Hamilton, L. H., Solomon, R., & Solomon, J. (2006). A proposal for standardized psychological screening of dancers. Journal of Dance Medicine and Science, 10(1 & 2), 40–45.Google Scholar
Hanrahan, C. & Vergeer, I. (2000–2001). Multiple uses of mental imagery by professional modern dancers. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 20(3), 231–255.Google Scholar
Hefferon, K. M. & Ollis, S. (2006). ‘Just clicks’: An interpretive phenomenological analysis of professional dancers’ experience of flow. Research in Dance Education, 7(2), 141–159.Google Scholar
Heiland, T. L., Murray, D. S., & Edley, P. P. (2008). Body image of dancers in Los Angeles: The cult of slenderness and media influence among dance students. Research in Dance Education, 9(3), 257–275. DOI: 10.1080/14647890802386932Google Scholar
Hutton, E., & Sundar, S. S. (2010). Can video games enhance creativity? Effects of emotion generated by Dance Dance Revolution. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 294–303. DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2010.503540Google Scholar
Jackson, P. L., & Decety, J. (2004). Motor cognition: A new paradigm to study self-other interactions. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14, 259–263.Google Scholar
James, K., Brodersen, M., & Eisenberg, J. (2004). Workplace affect and workplace creativity: A review and preliminary model. Human Performance, 17(2), 160–194.Google Scholar
Kalliopuska, M. (1989). Empathy, self-esteem and creativity among junior ballet dancers. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69, 1227–1234.Google Scholar
Karageorghis, C. I., Smith, D. L., & Priest, D-L. (2012). Effects of voice enhancement technology and relaxing music on the frequency of imagery among break dancers. Journal of Dance Medicine and Science, 16(1), 8–16.Google Scholar
Kattenstroth, J-C., Kolankowska, I., Kalisch, T., & Dinse, H. R. (2010). Superior sensory, motor, and cognitive performance in elderly individuals with multi-year dancing activities. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 2(31), 1–9. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi2010.00031Google Scholar
Kennedy, M. (2009). An examination of critical approaches to interdisciplinary dance performance. Research in Dance Education, 10(1), 63–74. DOI: 10.1080/14647890802697221Google Scholar
Krasnow, D. H., Chatfield, S. J., Barr, S., Jensen, J. L., & Dufek, J. S. (1997). Imagery and conditioning practices for dancers. Dance Research Journal, 29(1), 43–64.Google Scholar
Kulig, K., Oki, K. C., Chang, Y-J., & Bashford, G. R. (2014). Achilles and patellar tendon morphology in dancers with and without tendon pain. Medical Problems of Performing Artists, 29(4), 221–228.Google Scholar
Lacaille, N., Koestner, R., & Gaudreau, P. (2007). On the value of intrinsic rather than traditional achievement goals for performing artists: A short-term prospective study. International Journal of Music Education, 25(3), 245–257.Google Scholar
Lench, H. C., Levine, L. J., & Roe, E. (2010). Trait anxiety and achievement goals as predictors of self-reported health in dancers. Journal of Dance Medicine and Science, 14(4), 163–170.Google Scholar
Leube, D. T., Knoblich, G., Erb, M., Grodd, W., Bartels, M. & Kircher, T. T. J. (2003). The neural correlates of perceiving one’s own movements. Neuroimage, 20, 2084–2090. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.07.033Google Scholar
Liederbach, M., Schanfein, L., & Kremenic, I. J. (2013). What is known about the effect of fatigue on injury occurrence among dancers. Journal of Dance Medicine and Science, 17(3), 101–108. DOI: 10.12678/1089-313X.17.3.101Google Scholar
Lussier-Ley, C., & Durand-Bush, N. (2009). Exploring the role of feel in the creative experience of modern dancers: A realistic tale. Research in Dance Education, 10(3), 199–217. DOI: 10.1080/14647890993324154Google Scholar
Ma, H-H. (2009). The effect size of variables associated with creativity: A meta-analysis. Creativity Research Journal, 21(1), 30–42. DOI: 10.1080/10400410802633400Google Scholar
Marchant-Haycox, S. E., & Wilson, G. D. (1992). Personality and stress in performing artists. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(10), 1061–1068.Google Scholar
Martin, C. T., Ric, A., & Hristovski, R. (2015). Creativity and emergence of specific dance movements using instructional constraints. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(1), 65–74. DOI: 10.1037/a0038706Google Scholar
Matare, J. (2009). Creativity or musical intelligence? A comparative study of improvisation/improvisation performance by European and African musicians. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4, 194–203. DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2009.09.005Google Scholar
Monsma, E. V., & Overby, L. Y. (2004). The relationship between imagery and competitive anxiety in ballet auditions. Journal of Dance Medicine and Science, 8(1), 11–18.Google Scholar
Nelson, B., & Rawlings, D. (2009). How does it feel? The development of the Experience of Creativity Questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 21(1), 43–53. DOI: 10.1080/10400410802633442Google Scholar
Nordin, S. M., & Cumming, J. (2006a). The development of imagery in dance: Part I: Qualitative findings from professional dancers. Journal of Dance Medicine and Science, 10(1 & 2), 28–34.Google Scholar
Nordin, S. M., & Cumming, J. (2006b). The development of imagery in dance: Part II: Quantitative findings from a mixed sample of dancers. Journal of Dance Medicine and Science, 10(1 & 2), 21–27.Google Scholar
Nordin, S. M., & Cumming, J. (2006c). Measuring the content of dancers’ images development of the dance imagery questionnaire (DIQ). Journal of Dance Medicine and Science, 10(3 & 4), 85–98.Google Scholar
Nordin-Bates, S. M., Quested, E., Walker, I. J., & Redding, E. (2012). Climate change in the dance studio: Findings from the UK centres for advanced training. Sport Exercise and Performance Psychology, 1(1), 3–16. DOI: 10.1037/a0025316Google Scholar
Overby, L. Y., Hall, C., & Haslam, I. (1997–98). A comparison of imagery used by dance teachers, figure skating coaches, and soccer coaches. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 17(4), 323–337.Google Scholar
Padham, M., & Aujla, I. (2014). The relationship between passion and the psychological well-being of professional dancers. Journal of Dance Medicine and Science, 18(1), 37–44.Google Scholar
Piirto, J. (1998). Understanding those who create. 2nd edition. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Press, C. M., & Warburton, E. C. (2007). Creativity research in dance. In Bresler, L. (Ed.), International handbook of research in arts education, Vol. 16 (pp. 1273–1290). The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Price, B. R., & Pettijohn, T. F. (2006). The effect of ballet dance attire on body and self-perceptions of female dancers. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 34(8), 991–998. DOI: 10.2224/sbp.2006.34.8.991Google Scholar
Reid, L. A. (2008). Aesthetics and education. Research in Dance Education, 9(3), 295–304. DOI: 10.1080/j.4647890802416713Google Scholar
Rip, B., Fortin, S., & Vallerand, R. J. (2006). The relationship between passion and injury in dance students. Journal of Dance Medicine and Science, 10(1 & 2), 14–20.Google Scholar
Saarikallio, S., Luck, G., Burger, B., Thompson, M., & Toivianinen, P. (2013). Dance moves reflect current affective state illustrative of approach-avoidance motivation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 7(3), 296–305. DOI: 10.1037/a0032589Google Scholar
Sachs, C. (1937/1965). World history of the dance. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. K., & DeZutter, S. (2009). Distributed creativity: How collective creations emerge from collaboration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(2), 81–92. DOI: 10.1037/a0013282Google Scholar
Sheets-Johnstone, M. (1999). Emotion and movement: A beginning empirical-phenomenological analysis of their relationship. In Nunez, R. & Freeman, W. J. (Eds.), Reclaiming cognition: The primacy of action, intention and emotion (pp. 259–277). Bowling Green, OH:, Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J., Wigert, B., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Assessing creativity with self-report scales: A review and empirical evaluation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 6(1), 19–34. DOI: 10.1037/a0024071Google Scholar
Singer, K. (2004). The effect of neurofeedback on performance anxiety in dancers. Journal of Dance Medicine and Science, 8(3), 78–81.Google Scholar
Sowden, P. T., Clements, L., Redlich, C., & Lewis, C. (2015). Improvisation facilitates divergent thinking and creativity: Realizing a benefit of primary school arts education. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(2), 128–138. DOI: 10.1037/aca0000018Google Scholar
Stinson, S. W. (2004). My body/myself: Lessons from dance education. In Bresler, L. (Ed.), Knowing bodies, moving minds: Towards embodied teaching and learning (pp. 153–168). London: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Sullivan, P., & McCarthy, J. (2009). An experimental account of the psychology of art. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 3(3), 181–187. DOI: 10.1037/a0014292Google Scholar
Tharp, T. (2003). The creative habit: Learn and use it for life: A practical guide. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Thomson, P., & Jaque, S. V. (2011–2012). Anxiety and the influences of flow, trauma, and fantasy experiences on dancers. Cognition, Imagination and Personality, 32(2), 165–178.Google Scholar
Thomson, P., & Jaque, S. V. (2012). Dancing with the Muses: Dissociation and flow. Journal of Trauma and Dissociation, 13(4), 478–489.Google Scholar
Thomson, P., & Jaque, S.V. (2013). Exposing shame in dancers and athletes: Shame, trauma, and dissociation in a non-clinical population. Journal of Trauma and Dissociation, 141, 1–16. DOI: 10.1080/15299732.2012.757714Google Scholar
Thomson, P., & Jaque, S. V. (2015). Shame and fantasy in athletes and dancers. Cognition, Imagination and Personality, 34(3), 291–305.Google Scholar
Thomson, P., & Jaque, S. V. (2016). Visiting the Muses: Creativity and trauma in talented dancers and athletes. American Journal of Play, 8(3), 363–378.Google Scholar
Thomson, P. (2011). Dance and Creativity. In Runco, M. A. & Pritzker, S. R. (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of creativity, 2nd edition, Vol. 1 (pp. 343–350). London: Elsevier Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Tiggermann, M., & Slater, A. (2001). Test of objectification theory in former dancers and non-dancers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25(1), 57–64. DOI: 10.1111/1471-6402.00007Google Scholar
Tseng, M. M-C., Fang, D., Lee, M. B., Chie, W-C., Liu, J-P., & Chen, W. J. (2007). Two-phase survey of eating disorders in gifted dance and non-dance high-school students in Taiwan. Psychological Medicine, 37, 1085–1096. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291707000323Google Scholar
Twitchett, E., Angioi, M., Koutedakis, Y., & Wyon, M. (2010). The demands of a working day among female professional ballet dancers. Journal of Dance Medicine and Science, 14(4), 127–132.Google Scholar
Verghese, J. (2006). Cognitive and mobility profile in older social dancers. Journal of American Geriatric Society, 54(8), 1241–1244. DOI: 10.1111/,.1532-5415.2006.00808.xGoogle Scholar
Walker, I. J. & Nordin-Bates, S. M. (2010). Performance anxiety experiences of professional ballet dancers: The importance of control. Journal of Dance Medicine and Science, 14(4), 133–145.Google Scholar
Wanke, E. M., Arendt, M., Mill, H., Koch, F., Davenport, J., Fischer, A., & Groneberg, D. A. (2014). The theatrical stage as accident site in professional dancers. Medical Problems of Performing Artists, 29(1), 32–36.Google Scholar
Watson, D. E., Nordin-Bates, S. M., & Chappell, K. A. (2012). Facilitating and nurturing creativity in pre-vocational dancers: Findings from the UK centers for advanced training. Research in Dance Education, 13(2), 153–173.Google Scholar
Wigman, M. (1966). Mary Wigman: The language of dance. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Wilhelm, K., Kovess, V., Rios-Seidel, C., & Finch, A. (2004). Work and mental health. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 39, 866–873. DOI: 10.1007/s00127.004.0869-7Google Scholar
Wyrick, W. (1968). The development of a test of motor creativity. Research Quarterly, 39(3), 756–765. DOI: 10.1080/10671188.1968.10616608Google Scholar