Clerke, T. & Hopwood, N. (2014). Doing Ethnography in Teams: A Case Study of Asymmetries in Collaborative Research. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar

Davis, H. & Day, C. (2010). Working in Partnership: The Family Partnership Model. London: Pearson.Google Scholar

Davis, H. & Fallowfield, L. (1991). Counselling and Communication in Health Care. London: Wiley.Google Scholar

Day, C., Ellis, M. & Harris, L. (2015). Family Partnership Model Reflective Practice Handbook. London: Centre for Parent and Child Support for South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London.Google Scholar

Dunston, R., Lee, A., Boud, D., Brodie, P., & Chiarella, M. (2009). Co-production and health system reform – from re-imagining to re-making. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 68 (1), 1–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8500.2008.00608.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, A. (2005a). Let’s get beyond community and practice: the many meanings of learning by participating. Curriculum Journal, 16(1), 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, A. (2005b). Relational agency: learning to be a resourceful practitioner. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(3), 168–182.Google Scholar

Edwards, A. (2007). Working collaboratively to build resilience: a CHAT approach. Social Policy & Society, 6(2), 255–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, A. (2010). Being an Expert Practitioner: The Relational Turn in Expertise. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar

Edwards, A. (2011). Building common knowledge at the boundaries between professional practices: relational agency and relational expertise in systems of distributed expertise. International Journal of Educational Research, 50(1), 33–39.Google Scholar

Edwards, A. (2012). The role of common knowledge in achieving collaboration across practices. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1(1), 22–32.Google Scholar

Edwards, A. & Apostolov, A. (2007). A cultural-historical interpretation of resilience: the implications for practice. Critical Social Studies, 9(1), 70–84.Google Scholar

Edwards, A. & Daniels, H. (2012). The knowledge that matters in professional practices. Journal of Education and Work, 25(1), 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, A., Daniels, H., Gallagher, T., Leadbetter, J. & Warmington, P. (2009). Improving Inter-Professional Collaborations: Multi-Agency Working for Children’s Wellbeing. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Edwards, A. & Kinti, I. (2010). Working relationally at organisational boundaries: negotiating expertise and identity. In Daniels, H., Edwards, A., Engeström, Y., Gallagher, T. & Ludvigsen, S. (Eds.), Activity Theory in Practice: Promoting Learning across Boundaries and Agencies (pp. 126–139). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Edwards, A., Lunt, I. & Stamou, E. (2010). Inter-professional work and expertise: new roles at the boundaries of schools. British Educational Research Journal, 36(1), 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, A. & Mackenzie, L. (2005). Steps towards participation: the social support of learning trajectories. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 24(4), 282–302.Google Scholar

Ellsworth, E. (1997). Teaching Positions: Difference, Pedagogy and the Power of Address. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Engeström, Y. (1999). Learning by Expanding (German ed.). Marburg: BdWi-Verlag.Google Scholar

Engeström, Y. (2005). Knotworking to create collaborative intentionality capital in fluid organisational fields. In Beyerlein, M. M., Beyerlein, S. & Kennedy, F. (Eds.), Collaborative Capital: Creating Intangible Value (Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams, Volume 11) (pp. 307–336). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engeström, Y. (2007a). Enriching the theory of expansive learning. Mind, Culture and Activity, 14(1–2), 23–29.Google Scholar

Engeström, Y. (2007b). Putting activity theory to work. In Daniels, H., Cole, M. & Wertsch, J. (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Vygotsky (pp. 363–382). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fenwick, T. (2012). Coproduction in practice: a sociomaterial analysis. Professions & Professionalism, 2 (2), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fowler, C., & Lee, A. (2007). Knowing how to know: questioning ‘knowledge transfer’ as a model for knowing and learning in health. Studies in Continuing Education, 29(2), 181–193.Google Scholar

Fowler, C., Rossiter, C., Bigsby, M., Hopwood, N., Lee, A. & Dunston, R. (2012). Working in partnership with parents: the experience and challenge of practice innovation in child and family health nursing. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21(21–22), 3306–3314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hopwood, N. (2013). Ethnographic fieldwork as embodied material practice: reflections from theory and the field. In Denzin, N. K. (Ed.), 40th Anniversary of Studies in Symbolic Interaction (Studies in Symbolic Interaction, Volume 40) (pp. 227–245). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar

Hopwood, N. (2014a). The fabric of practices: times, spaces, bodies, things. In McLean, L., Stafford, L. & Weeks, M. (Eds.), Exploring Bodies in Time and Space (pp. 137–146). Oxfordshire, UK: Inter-Disciplinary Press.Google Scholar

Hopwood, N. (2014b). Four essential dimensions of workplace learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 26(6/7), 349–363.Google Scholar

Hopwood, N. (2014c). The rhythms of pedagogy: an ethnographic study of parenting education practices. Studies in Continuing Education, 36(2), 115–131.Google Scholar

Hopwood, N. (2014d). A sociomaterial account of partnership, signatures and accountability in practice. Professions & Professionalism, 4(2), 1–5.Google Scholar

Hopwood, N. (2014e). Using video to trace the embodied and material in a study of health practice. Qualitative Research Journal, 14(2), 197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hopwood, N. (2015a). Relational geometries of the body: doing ethnographic fieldwork. In Green, B. & Hopwood, N. (Eds.), The Body in Professional Practice, Learning and Education: Body/Practice (pp. 53–69). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hopwood, N. (2015b). Understanding partnership practice in primary health as pedagogic work: what can Vygotsky’s theory of learning offer? Australian Journal of Primary Health, 21(1), 9–13.Google Scholar

Hopwood, N. (2016). Professional Practice and Learning: Times, Spaces, Bodies, Things. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar

Hopwood, N. & Clerke, T. (2012). Partnership and Pedagogy in Child and Family Health Practice: A Resource for Professionals, Educators and Students. Hertsellung, Germany: Lambert Academic Publishing.Google Scholar

Hopwood, N., Dunston, R. & Clerke, T. (2013a). The Family Partnership Model in practice in New South Wales: working with families with complex needs to make a difference. Retrieved 19 December, 2013, from www.govint.org/good-practice/case-studies/the-family-partnership-model-in-practice-in-new-south-wales/Google Scholar

Hopwood, N., Fowler, C., Lee, A., Rossiter, C., & Bigsby, M. (2013b). Understanding partnership practice in child and family nursing through the concept of practice architectures. Nursing Inquiry, 20(3), 199–210.Google Scholar

Knorr Cetina, K. (1997). Sociality with objects: social relations in post-social knowledge societies. Theory, Culture & Society, 14(1), 1–29. doi: 10.1177/026327697014004001Google Scholar

Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic Cultures: How Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Knorr Cetina, K., & Brueggar, U. (2002). Traders' engagement with markets: a postsocial relationship. Theory, Culture & Society, 19(5–6), 161–185. doi: 10.1177/026327602761899200Google Scholar

Lee, A., Dunston, R., & Fowler, C. (2012). Seeing is believing: an embodied pedagogy of 'doing partnership' in child and family health. In Hager, P., Lee, A., & Reich, A. (Eds.), Practice, Learning and Change: Practice-Theory Perspectives on Professional Learning (pp. 267–276). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar

NSW Government. (2009). Keep Them Safe: A Shared Approach to Child WellBeing. Sydney: Department of Premier and Cabinet.Google Scholar

NSW Health. (2009). NSW Health/Families NSW Supporting Families Early Package. Sydney: NSW Department of Health.Google Scholar

NSW Health. (2011). Child and Family Health Nursing: Professional Practice Framework 2011–2016. Sydney: NSW Department of Health.Google Scholar

Rossiter, C., Fowler, C., Hopwood, N., Lee, A. & Dunston, R. (2011). Working in partnership with vulnerable families: the experience of child and family health practitioners. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 17(4), 378–383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wartofsky, M. W. (1973). Models: Representation and the Scientific Understanding. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel.Google Scholar

Apesoa-Verano, E. C. (2013). Inter-professional conflict and repair: a study of boundary work in the hospital. Sociological Perspectives, 56(3), 327–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bleakley, A., Boyden, J., Hobbs, A., Walsh, L. & Allard, J. (2006). Improving teamwork climate in operating theatres: the shift from multi-professionalism to inter-professionalism. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 20(5), 461–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bozhovich, L. I. (2009). The social situation of child development. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 47(4), 59–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlile, P. R. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: an integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organisation Science, 15(5), 555–568.Google Scholar

Collin, K., Paloniemi, S. & Mecklin, J-P. (2010). Promoting interprofessional teamwork and learning: the case of a surgical operating theatre. Journal of Education and Work, 23(1), 43–63.Google Scholar

Duncan, R. M. & Tarulli, D. (2003). Play as the leading activity of the preschool period: insights from Vygotsky, Leont’ev, and Bakhtin. Early Education and Development, 14(3), 271–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunér, A. & Wolmesjö, M. (2014). Interprofessional collaboration in Swedish health and social care from a care manager’s perspective. European Journal of Social Work, doi:10.1080/13691457.2014.908166.Google Scholar

Edwards, A. (2010). Being an Expert Professional Practitioner: The Relational Turn in Expertise. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar

Edwards, A., Daniels, H., Gallagher, T., Leadbetter, J. & Warmington, P. (2009). Improving Inter-Professional Collaborations: Multi-Agency Working for Children’s Wellbeing. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engeström, Y. (2014). Learning by Expanding, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Engeström, Y. & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5, 1–24.Google Scholar

Goodman, S. (1988). Hospital teachers: medical interpreters or raffia mafia? Archives of Disease in Childhood, 63, 333–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hallowell, L. M., Stewart, S. E., de Amorim e Silva, C. T. & Ditchfield, M. R. (2008). Reviewing the process of preparing children for MRI. Paediatric Radiology, 38(3), 271–279.Google Scholar

Kayes, M. (2005). The experience of novice hospital play specialists in their early months of employment. Unpublished MHSc thesis, AUT University, Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar

Lal, M. K., McClelland, J., Phillips, J., Taub, N. A. & Beattie, R. M. (2010). Comparison of EMLA cream versus placebo in children receiving distraction therapy for venepuncture. Acta Paediatrica, 90(2), 154–159.Google Scholar

Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, Consciousness and Personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

National Association of Health Play Specialists (NAPHS) (2015). www.nahps.org.uk. Accessed 8 April 2015.Google Scholar

Nuttall, J. (2013). Inter-professional work with young children in hospital: the role of ‘relational agency’. Early Years: An International Research Journal, 33(4), 413–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rainford, W. C., Wood, S., McMullen, P. C. & Philipsen, N. D. (2015). The disruptive force of lateral violence in the health care setting. Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 11 (2), 157–164.Google Scholar

Rollins, J. A., Bolig, R. & Mahan, C. C. (2005). Meeting Children’s Psychosocial Needs across the Health-Care Continuum. Austin, TX: Pro Ed.Google Scholar

Sims, D. (2011). Achieving collaborative competence through inter-professional education. Lessons learning from joint training in learning disability nursing and social work. Social Work Education, 30(1), 98–112.Google Scholar

Thompson, R. H. (Ed.) (2009). The Handbook of Child Life: A Guide for Paediatric Psychosocial Care. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar

Walker, J. (2009). Creating space for professional learning: a case study of hospital play specialists. In Edwards, S. & Nuttall, J. (Eds.). Professional Learning in Early Childhood Settings (pp. 49–60). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar

Barab, S. (2014). Design-based research: a methodological toolkit for engineering change. In Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, 2nd ed. (pp. 151–170). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cole, M. (1996) Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Cole, M. & the Distributed Literacy Consortium. (2006). The Fifth Dimension: An After-School Program Built on Diversity. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Davydov, V. V., Zinchenko, V. P. & Talyzina, N. F. (1983). The problem of activity in the works of A. N. Leont’ev. Soviet Psychology, 21, 31–42.Google Scholar

Edwards, A. (2005). Relational agency: learning to be a resourceful practitioner. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(3), 168–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engeström, Y. (2003). The horizontal dimension of expansive learning: weaving a texture of cognitive trails in the terrain of health care in Helsinki. In Achtenhagen, F. & John, E. G. (Eds.), Milestones of Vocational and Occupational Education and Training (The Teaching-Learning Perspective, Volume 1). Bielefeld, Germany: Bertelsmann.Google Scholar

Engeström, Y. (2007). From stabilization knowledge to possibility knowledge in organizational learning. Management Learning, 38(3), 271–275.Google Scholar

Engeström, Y. (2011). From design experiments to formative interventions. Theory & Psychology, 21(5), 598–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engeström, Y., Engeström, R. & Kärkkäinen, M. (1995). Polycontextuality and boundary crossing in expert cognition: learning and problem solving in complex work activities. Learning and Instruction, 5, 319–336.Google Scholar

Engeström, Y., Kajamaa, A. & Nummijoki, J. (2015). Double stimulation in everyday work: critical encounters between home care workers and their elderly clients. Learning, Culture and Social Interactions, 4, 48–61.Google Scholar

Engeström, Y., Puonti, A. & Seppänen, L. (2003). Spatial and temporal expansion of the object as a challenge for reorganizing work. In Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S. & Yanow, D. (Eds.), Knowing in Organizations: A Practice-Based Approach (pp. 151–186). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.Google Scholar

Engeström, Y. & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5, 1–24.Google Scholar

Engeström, Y., Sannino, A. & Virkkunen, J. (2014). On the methodological demands of formative interventions. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 2(2), 118–128.Google Scholar

Gresham, F. M. (2004). Current status and future directions of school-based behavioral interventions. School Psychology Review, 33(3), 326–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gutiérrez, K. D. (2014). Syncretic approaches to literacy learning: leveraging horizontal knowledge and expertise. In Dunston, L. B. et al. (Eds.), 62nd Yearbook of the Literacy Research Association. Oak Creek, WI: LRA.Google Scholar

Gutiérrez, K. D., Baguedano-López, P. & Tejeda, C. (1999). Rethinking diversity: hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6(4), 286–303.Google Scholar

Haapasaari, A. & Kerosuo, H. (2015). Transformative agency: the challenges of sustainability in a long chain of double stimulation. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 4(1), 37–47.Google Scholar

Kelly, A. E., Lesh, R. A. & Baek, J. Y. (Eds.) (2008). Handbook of Design Research Methods in Education: Innovations in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Learning and Teaching. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kendall, P. C. & Hollon, S. D. (Eds.) (2013). Cognitive-Behavioral Interventions: Theory, Research, and Procedures. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Leont’ev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the Development of the Mind. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar

Miettinen, R. (2013). Creative encounters, collaborative agency, and the extraordinary act of the meeting of a need and an object. In Sannino, A. & Ellis, V. (Eds.), Learning and Collective Creativity: Activity-Theoretical and Sociocultural Studies (pp. 158–177). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Sannino, A. (2010). Breaking out of a professional abstraction: the pupil as materialized object for trainee teachers. In Ellis, V., Edwards, A. & Smagorinsky, P. (Eds.), Cultural-Historical Perspectives on Teacher Education and Development: Learning Teaching (pp. 146–159). London: Routlege.Google Scholar

Sannino, A. (2011). Activity theory as an activist and interventionist theory. Theory & Psychology, 21(5), 571–597.Google Scholar

Sannino, A. (2016). Double stimulation in the waiting experiment with collectives. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar

Sannino, A. & Laitinen, A. (2015). Double stimulation in the waiting experiment: testing a Vygotskian model of the emergence of volitional action. Learning, Culture, and Social Interaction, 4(1), 4–18.Google Scholar

Sannino, A. & Sutter, B. (2011). Cultural-historical activity theory and interventionist methodology: classical legacy and contemporary developments. Theory & Psychology, 21(5), 557–570.Google Scholar

Virkkunen, J., Newnham, D. S., Nleya, P. & Engeström, R. (2012). Breaking the vicious circle of categorizing students in school. Learning, Culture, and Social Interaction, 1(3), 183–192.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1971). The Psychology of Art. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Lopez-Morillas, M. (Trans); Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S. & Souberman, E. (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky (Problems of General Psychology, Volume 1). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1997a). The historical meaning of the crisis in psychology: A methodological investigation. In The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky (Problems of the Theory and History of Psychology, Volume 3) (pp. 233–343). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1997b). The instrumental method in psychology. In The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky (Problems of the Theory and History of Psychology, Volume 3) (pp. 85–89). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar

Bellei, C., González, P. & Valenzuela, J. P. (2010) Fortalecer la educación pública: un desafío de interés nacional [Strengthening public education: a national interest challenge]. In Bellei, C., Contreras, D. & Valenzuela, J. P. (Eds.), Ecos de la revolución pingüina: avances, debates y silencios en la reforma educacional [Echoes from the penguin revolution: advances, debates, and silences in the educational reform]. Santiago, Chile: Centro de Investigación Avanzada en Educación de la Universidad de Chile y UNICEF. Pehuén Editores.Google Scholar

Bryk, A. S. & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in Schools: A Core Resource for Improvement. New York: Russell Sage..Google Scholar

Bush, T., Bell, L. & Middlewood, D. (2010). Introduction: new directions in educational leadership. In Bush, T., Bell, L. & Middlewood, D. (Eds.), The Principles of Educational Leadership and Management, 2nd ed. (pp 3–12). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Donoso, S. (2004). Reforma y política educacional en Chile 1990–2004. El neoliberalismo en crisis. [Reform and educational policies in Chile 1990–2004: the crisis of neoliberalism]. Estudios Pedagógicos, 31(1), 113–135.Google Scholar

Edwards, A. (2005) Relational agency: learning to be a resourceful practitioner. International Journal of Educational Research. 43(3), 168–182.Google Scholar

Edwards, A. (2010). Being an Expert Professional Practitioner: The Relational Turn in Expertise. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar

Edwards, A (2012). The role of common knowledge in achieving collaboration across practices. Learning, Culture, and Social Interaction, 1(1), 22–32.Google Scholar

Edwards, A. & Thompson, M. (2013). Resourceful leadership: revealing the creativity of organizational leaders. In Sannino, A. & Ellis, V. (Eds.), Learning and Collective Creativity: Activity-Theoretical and Sociocultural Studies (pp. 99–115). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Fleer, M. (2011). Motives as a central concept for learning. In McInerney, D. M., Walker, R. A. & Liem, G. A. D. (Eds.), Sociocultural Theories of Learning and Motivation: Looking Back, Looking Forward. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Hobson, A., Brown, E., Ashby, P., Keys, W., Sharp, C. & Benefield, P. (2003). Issues for Early Headship: Problems and Support Strategies. United Kingdom: National College for School Leadership. Available at http://www.ncsl.org.uk/mediastore/image2/hobson-issues-earlyheadship-full.pdfGoogle Scholar

Islas, P. & Mardones, R. (2007). La calidad es posible [Quality is possible]. In Matus, T. (Coordinator), La reforma municipal en la mira. identificando los municipios prioritarios en la Región Metropolitana: complejidad comunal versus condiciones para la calidad de la gestión public [Public Reform in the Spotlight: Identifying Priority Municipalities in the Metropolitan Area: Communal Complexity versus Communal Conditions for Quality of Public Management] (pp. 209–232). Santiago, Chile: Expansiva. Available at http://www.expansiva.cl/media/archivos/20071109111558.pdfGoogle Scholar

Leithwood, K., Harris, A. & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership & Management: Formerly School Organization, 28(1), 27–42.Google Scholar

López, V., Ahumada, L., Galdames, S. & Madrid, R. (2011). School principals at their lonely work: recording workday practices through ESM logs. Computers y Education, 58(1), 413–422.Google Scholar

Montecinos, C., Ahumada, L., Galdames, S., Campos, F. & Leiva, V. (2015). Targets, threats and (dis)trust: the managerial troika for public school principals in Chile. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(87), http://dx.doi.org/10.14507epaa.v23.2083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paredes, R. D. & Pinto, J. I. (2009). ¿El Fin de la educación pública en Chile? [Is this the end of public education in Chile?]. Estudios de Economía, 36(1), 47–66.Google Scholar

Redondo, J. (Coordinator), Almonacid, C., Inzunza, J., Mena, P. & de la Fuente, L. (2007). El derecho a la educación en Chile. [The right to education in Chile]. Buenos Aires: Fundación Laboratorio de Políticas Públicas. (e-Book: Libros FLAPE, 8). Available at http://foro-latino.org/apc-aa-files/49082854a19bddc87a51a2cfc647fc51/08chile_derecho.pdfGoogle Scholar

Santiago, P., Benavides, F., Danielson, C., Goe, L. & Nusche, D. (2013). OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education: Teacher Evaluation in Chile. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Available at http://www.oecd.org/chile/OECD%20Review%20Teacher%20Evaluation%20Chile.pdfGoogle Scholar

Tschannen-Moran, M. (2004). Trust Matters: Leadership for Successful Schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Valenzuela, J., Villarroel, G. & Villalobos, C. (2013). Ley de Subvención Escolar Preferencial (SEP): algunos resultados preliminares de su implementación. [Preferential School Subsidy Law (SEP): some preliminary results of its implementation]. Revista Pensamiento Educativo, 50(2), 113–131.Google Scholar

Valenzuela, J., Bellei, C. & De los Ríos, D. (2010). Segregación escolar en Chile [School segregation in Chile]. In Martinic, S. & Elcaqua, G. (Eds.), Fin de ciclo: Cambios en la gobernanza del sistema educativo [The end of a cycle: governance changes in the educational system]. Facultad de Educación, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile y Oficina Regional para América Latina y el Caribe UNESCO.Google Scholar

Walker, A. (2010). Building and leading learning cultures. In Bush, T., Bell, L. & Middlewood, D. (Eds.), The Principles of Educational Leadership and Management, 2nd ed. (pp. 176–196). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Weinstein, J. & Muñoz, G. (2013). When duties are not enough: principal leadership and public or private school management in Chile. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, doi:10.1080/09243453.2013.792850Google Scholar

Brandom, R. (1994). Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Brandom, R. (1995). Knowledge and the social articulation of the space of reasons. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 55, 895–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brandom, R. (1999). Interviewed by Carlo Penco. Epistemologia, XXII, 143–150. Available online at filosofia.dafist.unige.it/epi/hp/penco/pub/brandom_inter.pdfGoogle Scholar

Brandom, R. (2009). Reason in Philosophy: Animating Ideas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. S. (1996). The Culture of Education. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Cole, M. (1996). Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Derry, J. (2008). Abstract rationality in education: from Vygotsky to Brandom. Studies in the Philosophy of Education, 27, 49–62.Google Scholar

Derry, J. (2013). Can inferentialism contribute to social epistemology? Journal of the Philosophy of Education, 47(2), 222–235.Google Scholar

Edwards, A. (2004). Understanding context, understanding practice in early education. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 12(1), 85–102.Google Scholar

Edwards, A. (2010). Being an Expert Professional Practitioner: The Relational Turn in Expertise. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar

Edwards, A. (2011). Building common knowledge at boundaries between professional practices. International Journal of Educational Research, 50(1), 33–39.Google Scholar

Edwards, A. (2012). The role of common knowledge in achieving collaboration across practices. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1(1), 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, A. (2014). Designing tasks which engage learners with knowledge. In Thompson, I. (Ed.), Task Design, Subject Pedagogy and Student Engagement (pp. 13–27). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Engeström, Y. (2007). Enriching the theory of expansive learning: lessons from journeys toward coconfiguration. Mind, Culture and Activity, 14(1–2), 23–39.Google Scholar

Fleer, M. (2006). The cultural construction of child development: creating institutional and cultural intersubjectivity. International Journal of Early Years Education, 14(2), 127–140.Google Scholar

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.Google Scholar

Hedegaard, M. (2008). Developing a dialectic approach to researching children’s development. In Hedegaard, M. & Fleer, M. (2008) (Eds.), Studying Children: A Cultural-Historical Approach (pp. 30–45). London: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Hedegaard, M. (2009). Child development from a cultural–historical approach: children’s activity in everyday local settings as foundation for their development. Mind, Culture and Activity, 16, 64–81.Google Scholar

Hedegaard, M. (2012). The dynamic aspects in children’s learning and development. In Hedegaard, M.., Edwards, A. & Fleer, M., (Eds.). Motives in Children’s Development: Cultural-Historical Approaches (pp. 9–27). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hedegaard, M. & Chaiklin, S. (2005). Radical-Local Teaching and Learning. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar

Moll, L. C. (2005). Reflections and possibilities. In Gonzalez, N., Moll, L. C. & Amanti, C. (Eds.), Funds of Knowledge: Theorizing Practices in Households, Communities, and Classrooms. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Moll, L. C. & Greenberg, J. B. (1990). Creating zones of possibilities: combining social contexts for instruction. In Moll, L. C. (Ed.), Vygotsky and Education: Instructional Implications and Applications of Sociohistorical Psychology (pp. 319–348). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pippin, R. (2000). Liberation and the liberal arts: the aims of education. University of Chicago Record, 35(1), 163–183.Google Scholar

Sellars, W. (1956). Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. In Feigl, H. & Scriven, M. (Eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 1 (pp. 253–329). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press,Google Scholar

Tindale, C.W.(2011). Out of the space of reasons: argumentation, agents, and persons. Pragmatics & Cognition. 19(3), 383–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ackermann, S. & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objectives. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169.Google Scholar

Barnett, R. (2014). Conditions of flexibility: securing a more responsive higher education system. Higher Education Academy, January. Available online at www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/flexible-learning/flexiblepedagogies/conditions_of_ flexibility /mainGoogle Scholar

Breier, M. & Mabizela, M. (2008), Higher education. In Kraak, A. & Press, K. (Eds.), Human Resources Development (pp. 278–299). Cape Town: HSRC Press.Google Scholar

Buchler, M., Castle, J., Osman, R. & Walters, S. (2007) Equity, access and success: adult learners in public higher education. In Review of Higher Education in South Africa (pp. 124–156). Pretoria: Council on Higher Education.Google Scholar

Burawoy, M. (2011). Redefining the public university: global and national contexts. In Holmwood, J. (Ed.), A Manifesto for the Public University (pp. 27–41). London: Bloomsbury..Google Scholar

Castells, M. (2009). Communication Power. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Collins, C. (2011). Reflections on CHAT and Freire’s participatory action research from the West of Scotland: praxis, politics, and the ‘struggle for meaningful life’. Mind, Culture and Activity, 18(2), 98–114.Google Scholar

Division for Lifelong Learning (2010). Clearing the Ground: Towards Understanding and Implementing Flexible Learning/Teaching Provision at UWC: Update Report on Research. Bellville, South Africa: UWC.Google Scholar

Division for Lifelong Learning (2014). Flexible Learning and Teaching at UWC: Understandings, Practices and Implications – an Abbreviated Report. Bellville, South Africa: UWC.Google Scholar

Edwards, A. (2010). Being an Expert Professional Practitioner: The Relational Turn in Expertise. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar

Edwards, A. (2011). Building common knowledge at boundaries between professional practices. International Journal of Educational Research, 50, 33–39.Google Scholar

Edwards, A. (2012). The role of common knowledge in achieving collaboration across practices. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1(1), 22–32.Google Scholar

Edwards, A. & Thompson, M. (2013). Resourceful leadership: revealing the creativity of organisational leaders. In Sannino, A. & Ellis, V. (Eds.), Learning and Collective Creativity: Activity-Theoretical and Sociocultural Studies (pp. 49–64). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ellis, V. (2011). Reenergising professional creativity from a CHAT perspective: seeing knowledge and history in practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 18(2), 181–193.Google Scholar

Ellis, V. (2013). Teacher education in the public university: the challenge of democratising knowledge production. In Wells, G. & Edwards, A. (Eds.), Pedagogy in Higher Education: A Cultural Historical Approach (pp. 198–214). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Green, N., Woldoko, B., Foskey, R. & Brooks, M. (2013). Social media-enabled learning and the curriculum in Australian higher education – a literature review. Innovation in Distance Education, DeHub Monograph Series. NSW, Australia: University of New England.Google Scholar

Hall, B. (2001) I wish this were a poem of practices of participatory research. In Reason, P. & Bradbury, H. (Eds.), Handbook of Action Research: Participative Enquiry and Practice (pp. 167–172). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Herr, K. & Anderson, G. L. (2005). The Action Research Dissertation: A Guide for Students and Faculty. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Johnston, S. (1997). Introducing and supporting change towards more flexible teaching approaches. Conference paper presented at the Cambridge International Conference on Open and Distance Learning: The Convergence of Distance and Conventional Education: Patterns of Flexibility for the Individual Learner. In Tait, A. (Ed.) Collected Conference Papers (pp. 85–91). Cambridge, UK: Open University.Google Scholar

Kassam, Y. (1982). Participatory Research: An Emerging Alternative Methodology in Social Science Research. Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania: Black Star Agency.Google Scholar

Republic of South Africa (RSA) (2013). White Paper for Post-School Education and Training: Building an Expanded, Effective and Integrated Post-School System. 20 November. Pretoria, South Africa: Department of Higher Education and Training.Google Scholar

Walters, S. (1989). Education for Democratic Participation. Bellville, South Africa: University of Western Cape.Google Scholar

Walters, S. (2012). South Africa: higher education in lifelong learning in a middle-income country: but by the grace of champions? In Slowey, M. & Schuetze, H. G. (Eds.), Global Perspectives on Higher Education and Lifelong Learners (pp. 251–265). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar