Part II - Hobbesian Receptions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 January 2016
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Before AnarchyHobbes and his Critics in Modern International Thought, pp. 141 - 268Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Bibliography
Albee, Ernest (1895). “The Ethical System of Richard Cumberland,” The Philosophical Review 4, pp. 264–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alberti, Valentin (1676). Compendium Juris Naturae, Orthodoxae Theologiae Conformatum, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Behme, Thomas (1995). Samuel von Pufendorf: Naturrecht und Staat: Eine Analyse und Interpretation seiner Theorie, ihrer Grundlagen und Probleme, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Bowle, John (1969). Hobbes and His Critics: A Study in Seventeenth-Century Constitutionalism, London.Google Scholar
Carmichael, Gershom (2002). “Supplements and Observations upon Samuel Pufendorf’s On the Duty of Man and Citizen [Edinburgh, 1724],” in Moore, James and Silverthorne, Michael (eds.), The Writings of Gershom Carmichael, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Carr, Craig and Seidler, Michael (1996). “Pufendorf, Sociality and the Modern State,” History of Political Thought 17, pp. 352–378.Google Scholar
Cumberland, Richard (1672). A Philosophical Inquiry into the Laws of Nature, in Which Their Form, Chief Heads, Order, Promulgation, and Obligation, Are Deduced from the Nature of Things: Also the Elements of Mr. Hobbes’s Philosophy, as well Moral as Civil, Are Considered and Refuted, London.Google Scholar
Dufour, Alfred (1991). “Pufendorf,” in Burns, E.H. and Goldie, Mark (eds.), Cambridge History of Political Thought, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Eulau, Heinz (1941). “Theories of Federalism under the Holy Roman Empire,” The American Political Science Review 35, pp. 643–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbon, Edward (1969). “Memoirs,” in Bonnard, Georges (ed.), Edward Gibbon: Memoirs of My Life, New York.Google Scholar
Gierke, Otto (1966). Johannes Althusius und die Entwicklung Naturrechtlichen Staatstheorien [1880], trans. Freyd, Bernard, The Development of Political Theory, New York.Google Scholar
Gigas, Emil (1897). Briefe Samuel Pufendorfs an Christian Thomasius, 1687–1693, München und Leipzig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldie, Mark (1991). “The Reception of Hobbes,” in Burns, E.H. and Goldie, Mark (eds.), Cambridge History of Political Thought, Cambridge, pp. 589–615.Google Scholar
Goyard-Fabre, Simone (1989). “Pufendorf, adversaire de Hobbes,” Hobbes Studies 2, pp. 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, Hanns (1996). “Review of The Morality of the Fallen Man: Samuel Pufendorf on Natural Law by Kari Saastamoinen,” The American Historical Review 101, pp. 1184–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud (2000). “The Character and Obligation of Natural Law According to Richard Cumberland,” in Stewart, M.A. (ed.), English Philosophy in the Age of Locke, Oxford.Google Scholar
Haslam, Jonathan (2002). No Virtue Like Necessity: Realist Thought in International Relations since Machiavelli, Yale.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1998). On the Citizen, ed. Tuck, Richard and Silverthorne, Michael, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hochstrasser, Timothy (1993). “Conscience and Reason: The Natural Law Theory of Jean Barbeyrac,” The Historical Journal 36, pp. 289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochstrasser, Timothy (2000). Natural Law Theories in the Early Enlightenment, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hont, Istvan (1986). “The Language of Sociability and Commerce: Samuel Pufendorf and the Theoretical Foundations of the ‘Four-Stages’ Theory,” in Pagden, Anthony (ed.), Languages of Political Theory in Early Modern Europe, Cambridge, pp. 253–276.Google Scholar
Hont, Istvan (2005). Jealousy of Trade: International Competition and the Nation-State in Historical Perspective, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hufeland, Gottlieb (1790). Lehrsätze des Naturrechts und der damit Verbundenen Wissenschaften zu Vorlesungen, Jena.Google Scholar
Hunter, Ian (2001). Rival Enlightenments: Civil and Metaphysical Philosophy in Early Modern Germany, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, Ian (2004). “Conflicting Obligations: Pufendorf, Leibniz and Barbeyrac on Civil Authority,” History of Political Thought 25, pp. 670–699.Google Scholar
Hunter, Ian (2007). The Secularization of the Confessional State: The Political Thought of Christian Thomasius, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis (2002). An Essay on the Nature and Conduct of the Passions and Affections, with Illustrations on the Moral Sense [1728], Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich (1982). “On the Notion of ‘Interest’ in International Relations,” International Organization 36, pp. 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieger, Leonard (1960). “History and Law in the Seventeenth Century: Pufendorf,” Journal of the History of Ideas 21, pp. 198–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieger, Leonard (1965). The Politics of Discretion: Pufendorf and the Acceptance of Natural Law, Chicago.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried (1972). “Opinion on the Principles of Pufendorf” [1706], in Riley, Patrick (ed.), Leibniz: Political Writings, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Leira, Halvard (2007). “At the Crossroads: Justus Lipsius and the Early Modern Development of International Law,” Leiden Journal of International Law 20, pp. 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandeville, Bernard (1924). The Fable of the Bees: Or, Private Vices, Publick Benefits [1729], in Kaye, F.B. (ed.), vol. II, Part II, Fourth Dialgoue, Oxford.Google Scholar
Mautner, Thomas (1996). “Carmichael and Barbeyrac: The Lost Correspondence,” in Palladini, Fiammetta and Hartung, Gerald, Samuel Pufendorf und die Europäische Frühaufklärung, Berlin.Google Scholar
Mautner, Thomas (2004). “Review of Ed. FiammettaPalladini, Samuel Pufendorf: Gesammelte Werke, vol. V (Berlin: Akedemie Verlag, 1997),” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 12:3, pp. 540–543.Google Scholar
Meinecke, Friedrich (1957). “Die Idee der Staaträson in der Neueren Geschichte [Munich, 1924],” trans. Stark, Werner, Machiavellism: The Doctrine of Raison d’état and Its Place in Modern History, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
Niedermann, Joseph (1941). Kultur: Werden und Wandlungen des Begriffs und seiner Ersatzbegriffe von Cicero bis Herder, Florence.Google Scholar
Osler, Margaret (1991). Atoms, Pneuma, and Tranquility: Epicurean and Stoic Themes in European Thought, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pacchi, Arrigo (1978). “Hobbese l’epicureismo,” Revista Critica di Storia della Filosofia 33, pp. 54–71.Google Scholar
Palladini, Fiammetta (1990). Samuel Pufendorf Discepolo di Hobbes: Per una Reinterpretazione del Giusnaturalismo Moderno, Bologna.Google Scholar
Palladini, Fiammetta (1995). “Translating Samuel Pufendorf. On Two New English Editions,” History of Political Thought 16, pp. 121–132.Google Scholar
Palladini, Fiammetta (1999). La Biblioteca di Samuel Pufendorf: catalogo dell’asta di Berlin del septembre 1697, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Parkin, Jon (1999). Science, Religion, and Politics in Restoration England: Richard Cumberland’s De Legibus Naturae, London.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1931). “Elementorum Jurisprudentiae Universalis Libri Duo [1660],” in Scott, James Brown (ed.), The Classics of International Law, trans. Oldfather, William Abbott, Oxford.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1934). “De Jure Naturae et Gentium Libri Octo [1688],” in Scott, James Brown (ed.), The Classics of International Law, trans. Oldfather, William Abbott, Oxford.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1990). De Statu Hominum Naturali [Samuel Pufendorf’s On the Natural State of Men, the 1678 Latin Edition and English Translation, ed. Seidler, Michael, Lewiston, NY.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1991). On the Duty of Man and Citizen According to Natural Law [1673], ed. Tully, James, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1997a). “De Officii [1673],” in Hartung, Gerald (ed.), Samuel Pufendorf: Gesammelte Werke, Berlin.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1997b). “Specimen Controversiarum, Published Together with His Other Polemical Works under Eris Scandica [1678],” in Palladini, Fiammetta (ed.), Samuel Pufendorf: Gesammelte Werke, Berlin.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (2003). “De Officii [1673],” in Hunter, Ian and Saunders, David (eds.), The Whole Duty of Man, According to the Law of Nature, trans. Tooke, Andrew [1735], Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Riley, Patrick (1973a). “Review of Moral Philosophie und Naturrecht bei Samuel Pufendorf by Horst Denzer,” The American Political Science Review 67:4, pp. 1353–1355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, Patrick (1973b). “The Origins of Federal Theory in International Relations Ideas,” Polity 6, pp. 87–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, David and Hunter, Ian (2003). “Bringing the State to England: Andrew Tooke’s Translation of Samuel Pufendorf’s De Officio Hominis et Civis,” History of Political Thought 24, pp. 218–234.Google Scholar
Saunders, David and Hunter, Ian (2003). “The Natural Jurisprudence of Jean Barbeyrac: Translation as an Art of Political Adjustment,” Eighteenth-Century Studies 36, pp. 473–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schieder, Wolfgang (1972). “Sozialismus in Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe,” in Bruner, Otto, Conze, Werner, and Koselleck, Reinhart (eds.), Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe: Historisches Lexikon zur Politisch-Sozialen Sprache in Deutschland, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J.B. (1987). “Pufendorf’s Place in the History of Ethics,” Synthese 72, pp. 123–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (2002). Vision of Politics: Hobbes and Civil Science, vol. III, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam (1982). Jurisprudence or Notes from the Lectures on Justice, Police, Revenue, and Arms delivered in the University of Glasgow [1766], in Meek, R.L., Raphael, D.D., Stein, P.G., and Smith, Adam (eds.), Lectures on Jurisprudence, Indianapolis.Google ScholarPubMed
Stintzing, Roderich (1880). Geschichte der Deutschen Rechtswissenschaft, München and Leipzig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titius, Gottlieb Gerhard (1703). Observationes in Samuelis L.B. de Pufendorf De Officio Hominis et Civis Juxta Legem Naturalem Libros Duos, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard (1979). Natural Rights Theories: Their Origin and Development, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, James (1991). Pufendorf: On the Dity of Man and Citizen According to Natural Law, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Welzel, Hans (1986). Die Socialitas als Oberstes Naturrechtslehre Samuel Pufendorfs, Berlin, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wokler, Robert (1994). “Rousseau’s Pufendorf: Natural Law and the Foundations of Commercial Society,” History of Political Thought 15:3, pp. 373–402.Google Scholar
Bibliography
Bacon, Francis (1861–79). A Brief Discourse Touching the Happy Union of the Kingdoms of England and Scotland, in Spedding, James, Ellis, Robert Leslie and Heath, Douglas Denon, (eds.) The Works of Francis Bacon, London.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis (1884). Bacon’s Essays and Wisdom of the Ancients, (eds.) Spiers, and Montagu, , Boston.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley (1977). The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burlamaqui, Jean-Jacques (2006). The Principles of Natural and Politic Law [1747], trans. Nugent, Thomas [London, 1763], Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Carmichael, Gershom (2002). Supplements and Observations upon Samuel Pufendorf’s On the Duty of Man and Citizen [Edinburgh, 1724], in Moore, James and Silverthorne, Michael (eds.), The Writings of Gershom Carmichael, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Cavallar, Georg (2002). The Rights of Strangers: Theories of International Hospitality, the Global Community, and Political Justice since Vitoria, Burlington, VT.Google Scholar
Christov, Theodore (2005). “Liberal Internationalism Revisited: Grotius, Vattel, and the International Order of States,” The European Legacy 10:6, pp. 561–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cumberland, Richard (1672). A Philosophical Inquiry into the Laws of Nature, in Which Their Form, Chief Heads, Order, Promulgation, and Obligation, Are Deduced from the Nature of Things: Also the Elements of Mr. Hobbes’s Philosophy, as well Moral as Civil, Are Considered and Refuted, London.Google Scholar
Devetak, Richard (2007). “Between Kant and Pufendorf: Humanitarian Intervention, Statist Anti-Cosmopolitanism and Critical International Theory,” Review of International Studies 33, pp. 151–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufour, Alfred (1991). “Pufendorf,” in Burns, E.H. and Goldie, Mark (eds.), Cambridge History of Political Thought, Cambridge, pp. 561–588.Google Scholar
Dofour, Alfred (1996). “Pufendorfs Föderalistisches Denken und die Staatsräsonlehre,” in Palladini, Fiammetta and Hartung, Gerald (eds.), Samuel Pufendorf und die Europäische Frühaufklärung, Berlin.Google Scholar
Gierke, Otto von (1957). Natural Law and the Theory of Society: 1500 to 1800, trans. Barker, Ernest, Boston.Google Scholar
Gentili, Alberico (1933). De Jure Belli Libri Tres (1589), trans. Rolfe, John C., Oxford.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo (1950). De Iure Praedae Commentarius, ed. Williams, Gladys and Zeydel, Walter, Oxford.Google Scholar
Haslam, Jonathan (2002). No Virtue Like Necessity: Realist Thought in International Relations since Machiavelli, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1969). The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic, ed. Tönnies, Ferdinand, 2nd edn, introd., M.M. Goldsmith, London.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1998). On the Citizen, ed. Tuck, Richard and Silverthorne, Michael, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Irwin, Douglass (1996). Against the Tide: An Intellectual History of Free Trade, Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1991). Political Writings, trans. Nisbet, H.B., ed. Reiss, Hans, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Korman, Sharon (1996). The Right of Conquest: The Acquisition of Territory by Force in International Law and Practice, Oxford.Google Scholar
Krieger, Leonard (1965). The Politics of Discretion: Pufendorf and the Acceptance of Natural Law, Chicago.Google Scholar
Lenner, Andrew (1997). “John Taylor and the Origins of American Federalism,” Journal of the Early Republic 17, pp. 399–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, G.W. (1972). The Political Writings of Leibniz, ed. Riley, Patrick, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Meinecke, Friedrich (1957). Die Idee der Staaträson in der Neueren Geschichte [Munich, 1924], trans. Stark, Werner, Machiavellism: The Doctrine of Raison d’état and Its Place in Modern History, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans (1948). Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, New York.Google Scholar
Nakhimovsky, Isaac (2011). The Closed Commercial State: Perpetual Peace and Commercial Society from Rousseau to Fichte, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Nafziger, James A.R. (1983). “The General Admission of Aliens under International Law,” The American Journal of International Law 77, pp. 804–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palladini, Fiametta (1978). Discussioni Seicentesche su Samuel Pufendorf: Scritti Latini, 1663–1700, Bologna.Google Scholar
Pocock, J.G.A. (1995). “Empire, State and Confederation: The War of American Independence as a Crisis in Multiple Monarchy,” in Robertson, John, A Union for Empire: Political Thought and the British Union of 1707, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pouncey, Peter (1980). The Necessities of War: A Study of Thucydides’ Pessimism, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1702). The Complete History of Sweden, From Its Origin to This Time [1696], London.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1708). Dissertatio De Foederibus Inter Sueciam et Galliam, The Hague.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1719). An Introduction to the History of the Principal Kingdoms and States of Europe [1682], London.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (2003). De Officii [1673], in Hunter, Ian and Saunders, David, The Whole Duty of Man, According to the Law of Nature, trans. Tooke, Andrew [1735], Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (2007). The Present State of Germany [1667], trans. Bohun, Edmund (London, 1696), ed. Seidler, Michael, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Seidler, Michael (1993). ‘Religion, Populism, and Patriarchy: Political Authority from Luther to Pufendorf,’ Ethics 103, pp. 551–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suârez, Francisco (1944). De Legibus ac Deo Legislatore (1612), ed. Williams, Gwladys L., London.Google Scholar
Teichgraeber, Richard F. (1986). “Free Trade” and Moral Philosophy: Rethinking the Sources of Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
Titius, (1769). Observationes in Samuelis L.B. de Pufendorf De Officio Hominis et Civis Juxta Legem Naturalem Libros Duos [Leipzig, 1703], Lugduni Batavorum.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard (1987). “The ‘Modern’ Theory of Natural Law,” in Pagden, Anthony (ed.), The Languages of Political Theory in Early Modern Europe, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard (1999). The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant, Oxford.Google Scholar
Vitoria, (1991). Relectiones de Indis (1532), in Pagden, Anthony and Lawrence, Jeremy (eds.), Vitoria: Political Writings, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Adam (1984). “European International Society and Its Expansion,” in Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam (eds.), The Expansion of International Society, Oxford.Google Scholar
Watson, Adam (1992). The Evolution of International Society: A Comparative Historical Analysis, London.Google Scholar
Whelan, Frederick (1981). “Citizenship and the Right to Leave,” The American Political Science Review 75, pp. 636–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wight, Martin (1991). International Theory: The Three Traditions, ed. Wight, Gabriele and Porter, Brian, Leicester.Google Scholar
Wight, Martin (1997). “De Systematibus Civitatum,” in Bull, Hedley (ed.), Systems of States, Leicester.Google Scholar
Bibliography
Armitage, David (2011). “Globalizing Jeremy Bentham,” History of Political Thought 32:1, pp. 63–82.Google Scholar
Condorcet, Jean-Marie Caritat (1955). Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Progress of the Human Mind [1795], ed. Berlin, Isaiah, Hampshire, Stuart, and Wollheim, Richard, London.Google Scholar
Constant, Benjamin (1988). The Political Writings of Benjamin Constant, ed. Fontana, Biancamaria, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Adam (1995). Ferguson: An Essay on the History of Civil Society [1767], ed. Oz-Salzberger, Fania, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Forsyth, M.G., Keens-Soper, H.M.A, and Savigear, A., eds. (1970). The Theory of International Relations: Selected Texts from Gentili to Treitsche, London.Google Scholar
Gallie, W.B. (1978). Philosophers of Peace and War: Kant, Clausewitz, Marx, Engels and Tolstoy, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinsley, F.H. (1963). Power and the Pursuit of Peace: Theory and Practice in the History of Relations between States, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Stanley (1963). “Rousseau on War and Peace,” American Political Science Review 57:2, pp. 317–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1970). Kant: Political Writings, ed. Reiss, Hans, trans. Nisbet, H.B., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kapossy, Béla (2006). Iselin contra Rousseau: Sociable Patriotism and the History of Mankind, Basel.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart (1988). Critique and Crisis: Enlightenment and the Pathogenesis of Modern Society, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Lang, Daniel George (1985). Foreign Policy in the Early Republic: The Law of Nations and the Balance of Power, Baton Rouge, LA.Google Scholar
Parkin, Jon (2007). Taming the Leviathan: The Reception of the Political and Religious Ideas of Thomas Hobbes in England, 1640–1700, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, JGA (2002). “Some Europes in Their History,” in Pagden, Anthony (ed.), The Idea of Europe: From Antiquity to the European Union, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Putnam, George Haven (1920). L’État de Guerre and Projet de Paix Perpétuelle, New York.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, Helena (2008). “Rousseau, the Anticosmopolitan?,” Daedalus 137:3, pp. 59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, Jean Jacques (1915). The Political Writings of Jean Jacques Rousseau: Edited from the Original Manuscripts and Authentic Editions. In Two Volumes, ed. Vaughn, C.E., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean Jacques (1966). Two Essays on the Origin of Language: Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Johann Gottfried Herder, trans. Moran, John H. and Gode, Alexander, Chicago.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean Jacques (1990). Reading Rousseau in the Nuclear Age, Grace G. Roosevelt, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean Jacques (1991). Rousseau on International Relations, eds. Hoffman, Stanley and Fidler, David, Oxford.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean Jacques (1997a). Rousseau: “The Social Contract” and Other Later Political Writings, ed. Gourevitch, Victor, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean Jacques (1997b). Rousseau: The Discourses and Other Early Political Writings, ed. Gourevitch, Victor, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard (1999). The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant, Oxford.Google Scholar
Vattel, Emer (2008a). The Law of Nations: Or, Principles of the Law of Nature, Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns [1758], eds. Kapossy, Béla and Whatmore, Richard, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Vattel, Emer (2008b). Mélanges de Littérature, de Morale et de Politique, ed. Kapossy, Béla and Whatmore, Richard, History of European Ideas 34:1, pp. 77–103.Google Scholar
Vaughn, C.E. (1917). Jean-Jacques Rousseau: A Lasting Peace through the Federation of Europe and the State of War, London.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael (1977). Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations, New York.Google Scholar
Windenberger, J.L. (1900). Essaisur le Système de Politique Étrangère de J.-J. Rousseau: La République Confédérative des Petits États, Paris.Google Scholar
Whatmore, Richard (2009). “‘Neither Masters nor Slaves’: Small States and Empire in the Long Eighteenth Century,” in Kelly, Duncan (ed.), Lineages of Empire: The Historical Roots of British Imperial Thought, Oxford.Google Scholar
Whatmore, Richard (2012). Against War and Empire: Geneva, Britain, and France in the Eighteenth Century, New Haven, CT.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bibliography
Ackerman, Bruce and Katyal, Neal (1995). “Our Unconventional Founding,” The University of Chicago Law Review 62, pp. 475–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, M.S. (1970). “Eighteenth-Century Theories of the Balance of Power,” in Hatton, R. and Anderson, M.S. (eds.), Studies in Diplomatic History: Essays in Memory of D.B. Horn, Hamden, CT.Google Scholar
Armitage, David (2005). “The Contagion of Sovereignty: Declarations of Independence since 1776,” South African Historical Journal 52, pp. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaulac, Stephane (2003). “Emer de Vattel and the Externalization of Sovereignty,” Journal of the History of International Law 5, pp. 237–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bricker, John W. (1953) “Making Treaties and Other International Agreements,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 289, pp. 134–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brierly, J.L. (1963) The Law of Nations: An Introduction to the International Law of Peace, Oxford.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley (1977). The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clinton, David (1993). “International Obligations: To Whom Are They Owed?,” The Review of Politics 55, pp. 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Amato, Anthony and Engel, Kirsten (1988). “State Responsibility for the Exportation of Nuclear Power Technology,” Virginia Law Review 74, pp. 1011–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deudney, Daniel (1995). “The Philadelphian System: Sovereignty, Arms Control, and Balance of Power in the American States-Union, Circa 1787–1861,” International Organization 49, pp. 191–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deudney, Daniel (2007). Bounding Power: Republican Security Theory from the Polis to the Global Village, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Engdahl, David E. (1965). “Characterization of Interstate Arrangements: When Is a Compact Not a Compact?,” Michigan Law Review 64, pp. 63–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, Richard (1975). “New Paradigm for International Legal Studies: Prospects and Proposals,” The Yale Law Journal 84, pp. 969–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fontana, Biancamaria (2002). “The Napoleonic Empire and the Europe of Nations,” in Pagden, Anthony (ed.), The Idea of Europe: From Antiquity to the European Union, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ford, Washington C. (1913–17). The Writings of John Quincy Adams, ed. Ford, Washington C., 7 vols., New York.Google Scholar
Fowler, Michael Ross and Bunck, Julie Marie (1995). Law, Power, and the Sovereign State: The Evolution and Application of the Concept of Sovereignty, University Park, PA.Google Scholar
Gallie, W.B. (1978). Philosophers of Peace and War: Kant, Clausewitz, Marx, Engels and Tolstoy, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Stephen A. (1976). “Nixonian Foreign Policy: A New Balance of Power, or a Revived Concert?,” Polity 8, pp. 389–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gierke, Otto von (1957). Natural Law and the Theory of Society, 1500 to 1800, trans. Barker, Ernest, Boston.Google Scholar
Goodman, Ryan (2006). “Humanitarian Intervention and Pretexts for War,” The American Journal of International Law 100, pp. 107–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grey, Thomas (1978). “Origins of the Unwritten Constitution: Fundamental Law In American Revolutionary Thought,” Stanford Law Review 30, pp. 843–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, Leo (1948). “The Peace of Westphalia, 1648–1948,” The American Journal of International Law 42, pp. 20–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grotius, Hugo (2005). The Rights of War and Peace, ed. Tuck, Richard, Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar
Hinsley, F.H. (1965). Power and the Pursuit of Peace: Theory and Practice in the History of Relations between States, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1994). David Hume: Political Writings, eds. Warner, Stuart and Livingston, Donald, Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew (2003). “International Law and the Making and Unmaking of Boundaries,” in Buchanan, Allen and Moore, Margaret (eds.), States, Nations, and Borders: The Ethics of Making Boundaries, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ion, Theodore P. (1911). “Sanctity of Treaties,” The Yale Law Journal 20, pp. 268–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janis, Mark W. (1999). “Religion and the Literature of International Law: Some Standard Texts,” in Janis, Mark W. and Evans, Carolyn (eds.), Religion and International Law, The Hague.Google Scholar
Jay, Stewart (1989). “The Status of the Law of Nations in Early American Law,” Vanderbilt Law Review 42, pp. 819–849.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. Glen (1980). “Historical Perspectives on Human Rights and U. S. Foreign Policy,” Universal Human Rights 2, pp. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Paul W. (1987). “From Nuremberg to The Hague: The United States Position in Nicaragua v. United States and the Development of International Law,” Yale Journal of International Law 12, pp. 1–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1970). Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch [1795], in Reiss, H.S. (ed.) Kant: Political Writings, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Keene, Edward (2002). Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, David (1986). “Primitive Legal Scholarship,” Harvard International Law Journal 27, pp. 1–98.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart (1988). Critique and Crisis: Enlightenment and the Pathogenesis of Modern Society, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti (2001). The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, Daniel G. and Russell, Greg (1990). “The Ethics of Power in American Diplomacy: The Statecraft of John Quincy Adams,” The Review of Politics 52, pp. 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, Daniel George (1985). Foreign Policy in the Early Republic: The Law of Nations and the Balance of Power, Baton Rouge, LA.Google Scholar
Linklater, Andrew (1982). Men and Citizens in the Theory of International Relations, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lobel, Jules (1985). “The Limits of Constitutional Power: Conflicts between Foreign Policy and International Law,” Virginia Law Review 71, pp. 1071–1180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauerseth, Per (1964). “Balance-of-Power Thinking from the Renaissance to the French Revolution,” Journal of Peace Research 1, pp. 120–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, Gary L. (2000). “The Politics of Meaning: Law Dictionaries and the Liberal Tradition of Interpretation,” The American Journal of Legal History 44, pp. 257–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans (1948). Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, New York.Google Scholar
Morley, Michael T. (2002). “The Law of Nations and the Offenses Clause of the Constitution: A Defense of Federalism,” The Yale Law Journal 112, pp. 109–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nafziger, James A. R. (1983). “The General Admission of Aliens under International Law,” The American Journal of International Law 77, pp. 804–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nifong, William R. (2000). “Promises Past: Marcus AtiliusRegulus and the Dialogue of Natural Law,” Duke Law Journal 49, pp. 1077–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noyes, John E. (1999). “Christianity and Theories of International Law in Nineteenth-Century Britain,” in Janis, Mark W. and Evans, Carolyn (eds.), Religion and International Law, The Hague.Google Scholar
Onuf, Peter, and Onuf, Nicholas (1993). Federal Union, Modern World: The Law of Nations in an Age of Revolutions, 1776–1814, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Osiander, Andreas (1994). The States System of Europe, 1640–1990: Peacemaking and the Conditions of International Stability, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palan, Ronen (2002). “Tax Havens and the Commercialization of State Sovereignty,” International Organization 56, pp. 151–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, J.G.A. (2002). “Some Europes in Their History,” in Pagden, Anthony (ed.) The Idea of Europe: From Antiquity to the European Union, Cambridge, pp. 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pufendorf, (1688) An Introduction to the History of the Principal Kingdoms and States of Europe [1682] (London, 1719).Google Scholar
Rossi, Christopher (1998). Broken Chain of Being: James Brown Scott and the Origins of Modern International Law, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, J.S. (1937). “The First American Treatise on International Law,” The American Journal of International Law 31, pp. 697–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacque (1990). “Summary of Saint-Pierre’s Project for Perpetual Peace,” in Roosevelt, Grace (ed.), Reading Rousseau in the Nuclear Age, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl (2003). The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum, New York.Google Scholar
Sherry, Suzanna (1987). “The Founders’ Unwritten Constitution,” The University of Chicago Law Review 54, pp. 1127–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Striner, Richard (1995). “Political Newtonianism: The Cosmic Model of Politics in Europe and America,” The William and Mary Quarterly 52, pp. 583–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Ann van Wynen and Thomas, A. J. (1951). “Equality of States in International Law. Fact or Fiction?” Virginia Law Review 37, pp. 791–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vagts, Alfred (1948). “The Balance of Power: Growth of an Idea,” World Politics 1, pp. 82–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vattel, Emer de (1741). Défense du système leibnitzien contra les objections et imputations de Mr. de Crousaz, continues dans l’Examen de l’Essai su l’homme de Mr. Pope. Oul’on a joint la Réponse aux objections de Mr.Roques, continues dans le Journal Helvétique, par Mr.Emer de Vattel, Leyden.Google Scholar
Vattel, Emer de (1746). Pieces diverses, avec quelques lettres de morale et d’amusement, Paris.Google Scholar
Vattel, Emer de (1747). “Essai sur le fondement du droit naturel,” Le loisir philosophique; ou pièces diverses de philosophie, de morale, et d’amusement, Geneva.Google Scholar
Vattel, Emer de (1916). The Law of Nations or the Principles of Natural Law, Applied to the Conduct and to the Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns, trans. Fenwick, C.G. in Scott, J. Brown, ed., The Classics of International Law, Washington.Google Scholar
Vattel, Emer de (2008a). The Law of Nations, ed. Kapossy, Béla and Whatmore, Richard, Indiana, IN.Google Scholar
Vattel, Emer de (2008b). ‘Emer de Vattel’s Mélanges de littérature, de morale et de politique (1760),’ History of European Ideas 34, pp. 77–103.Google Scholar
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, May 23, 1969.Google Scholar
Vollenhoven, Cornelius (1919). The Three Stages in the Evolution of the Law of Nations, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voltaire, , (1901), The Works of Voltaire. A Contemporary Version, in 21 vols., New York.Google Scholar
Wehberg, Hans (1959). “Pacta Sunt Servanda,” The American Journal of International Law 53, pp. 775–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wharton, Francis (1889). The Revolutionary Diplomatic Correspondence of the United States, vol. II, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Wight, Martin (1966). “Why Is There No International Theory?,” in Butterfield, Herbert and Wight, Martin (eds.), Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics, London.Google Scholar
Wilson, George Grafton (1938). “The Influence of Dumas,” The American Journal of International Law 32, pp. 346–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, Christian (1995). Jus Gentium Methodo Scientifica Petractatum [1749], Buffalo, NY.Google Scholar
Wright, Quincy (1957). “International Conflict and the United Nations,” World Politics 10, pp. 24–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Quincy (1963). “Toward a Universal Law for Mankind,” Columbia Law Review 63, pp. 435–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar