Asbury, K., & Plomin, R. (2014). G is for genes: The impact of genetics on education and achievement (Vol. 24). Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Benyamin, B., Pourcain, B., Davis, O. S., Davies, G., Hansell, N. K., Brion, M. J., et al. (2014). Childhood intelligence is heritable, highly polygenic and associated with FNBP1L. Molecular Psychiatry, 19(2), 253–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boardman, J. D., Saint Onge, J. M., Haberstick, B. C., Timberlake, D. S., & Hewitt, J. K. (2008). Do schools moderate the genetic determinants of smoking? Behavior Genetics, 38(3), 234–246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Byrne, B., Khlentzos, D., Olson, R. K., & Samuelsson, S. (2010). Evolutionary and genetic perspectives on educational attainment. In Littleton, K., Wood, C., & Staarman, J. K. (Eds.), International handbook of psychology in education, (pp. 3–34). Bingly, UK: Emerald.Google Scholar

Center for Genomics and Public Health. (n.d.) Genomics versus genetics: What’s the difference? Retrieved from http://depts.washington.edu/cgph/GenomicsGenetics.htm.Google Scholar

Champagne, F. A., & Mashoodh, R. (2009). Genes in context gene–environment interplay and the origins of individual differences in behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(3), 127–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charney, E. (2008). Politics, genetics, and “greedy reductionism.” Perspectives on Politics, 6(2), 337–343.Google Scholar

Charney, E. (2012). Behavior genetics and postgenomics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(5), 331–358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chorney, M. J., Chorney, K., Seese, N., Owen, M. J., Daniels, J., McGuffin, P., et al. (1998). A quantitative trait locus associated with cognitive ability in children. Psychological Science, 9(3), 159–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cole, S. W. (2009). Social regulation of human gene expression. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(3), 132–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Collins, F. S., & Mansoura, M. K. (2001). The Human Genome Project. Revealing the shared inheritance of all humankind. Cancer, 91(1 Suppl.), 221–225.3.0.CO;2-9>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Collins, F. S., Green, E. D., Guttmacher, A. E., & Guyer, M. S. (2003). A vision for the future of genomics research. Nature, 422(6934), 835–847.Google Scholar

Corno, L., & Snow, R. E. (1986). Adapting teaching to individual differences in learners. In Wittrock, M. C. (Ed.), Third handbook of research on teaching (pp. 605–629). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar

Cronbach, L. J. (1955). Text materials in modern education: A comprehensive theory and platform for research. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Schmidt, J. (1997). Stress and resilience in adolescence: An evolutionary perspective. In Borman, K. & Schneider, B. (Eds.), The adolescent years: Social influences and educational challenges, Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 99(5), 1–17.Google Scholar

Dai, D. Y., & Coleman, L. J. (2005). Introduction to the special issue on nature, nurture, and the development of exceptional competence. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28(3–4), 254–269.Google Scholar

Dick, D. M., Li, T. K., Edenberg, H. J., Hesselbrock, V., Kramer, J., Kuperman, S., et al. (2004). A genome-wide screen for genes influencing conduct disorder. Molecular Psychiatry, 9(1), 81–86.Google Scholar

Diseth, Å. (2011). Self-efficacy, goal orientations and learning strategies as mediators between preceding and subsequent academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(2), 191–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dufell, J. C. (2016). Global greatness: How social-emotional learning helps children success in school, in the workplace, and in life. Committee for Children. Retrieved from www.cfchildren.orgGoogle Scholar

Eapen, V. (2011). Genetic basis of autism: Is there a way forward? Current Opinions in Psychiatry, 24(3), 226–236.Google Scholar

Elliott, J. G., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2014). The neurobiological bases of reading and reading disability. In Elliott, J. G. & Grigorenko, E. L. (Eds.) The dyslexia debate (pp. 88–122). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fairbanks, C. M., Duffy, G. G., Faircloth, B. S., He, Y., Levin, B., Rohr, J., & Stein, C. (2009). Beyond knowledge: Exploring why some teachers are more thoughtfully adaptive than others. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 161–171.Google Scholar

Flynn, J. R. (1999). Searching for justice: The discovery of IQ gains over time. American Psychologist, 54(1), 5–20.Google Scholar

Flynn, J. R. (2007). What is intelligence? Beyond the Flynn effect. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fox, L., & Hemmeter, M. L. (2009). A programwide model for supporting social emotional development and addressing challenging behavior in early childhood settings. In Sailor, W., Dunlap, G., Sugai, G., & Horner, R. (Eds.), Handbook of positive behavior support (pp. 177–202). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galton, F. (1876). The history of twins, as a criterion of the relative powers of nature and nurture. Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 5, 391–406.Google Scholar

Grigorenko, E. L., & Dozier, M. (2013). Introduction to the special section on genomics. Child Development, 84(1), 6–16.Google Scholar

Hodapp, R. M., & Fidler, D. J. (1999). Special education and genetics connections for the 21st century. Journal of Special Education, 33(3), 130–137.Google Scholar

Holliday, R. (2006). Epigenetics: A historical overview. Epigenetics, 1(2), 76–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

Knafo, A., & Plomin, R. (2006). Prosocial behavior from early to middle childhood: Genetic and environmental influences on stability and change. Developmental Psychology, 42(5), 771.Google Scholar

Krapohl, E., Rimfeld, K., Shakeshaft, N. G., Trzaskowski, M., McMillan, A., Pingault, J. B., et al. (2014). The high heritability of educational achievement reflects many genetically influenced traits, not just intelligence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(42), 15273–15278.Google Scholar

Kyllonen, P. C. (2016). Human cognitive abilities: Their organization, development, and use. In Corno, L. & Anderman, E. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mandinach, E. B., & Honey, M. (Eds.). (2008). Data-driven school improvement: Linking data and learning. Technology, education–connections (TEC) series. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Mandinach, E. B., Parton, B. M., Gummer, E. S., & Anderson, R. (2015). Ethical and appropriate data use requires data literacy. Phi Delta Kappan, 96(5), 25–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McLeod, S., & Bleile, K. (2003). Neurological and developmental foundations of speech acquisition. Chicago, IL: American Speech Language Hearing Association Convent.Google Scholar

McMahon, S. D., & Washburn, J. J. (2003). Violence prevention: An evaluation of program effects with urban African American students. Journal of Primary Prevention, 24(1), 43–62.Google Scholar

Meaney, M. J. (2010). Epigenetics and the biological definition of gene x environment interactions. Child Development, 81(1), 41–79.Google Scholar

Moalem, S. (2014). Inheritance: How our genes change our lives -- and our lives change our genes. New York, NY: Grand Central Publishing.Google Scholar

Molfese, D., Key, A. F., Maguire, M., Dove, G., & Molfese, V. (2005). Event-related evoked potentials (ERPs) in speech perception. In Pisoni, D. B. & Remez, R. E. (Eds.),The handbook of speech perception (pp. 99–121). Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nettelbeck, T., & Wilson, C. (2013). Intelligence and IQ. In Wheldall, K. (Ed.), Developments in educational psychology. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Plomin, R. (1998). Using DNA in health psychology. Health Psychology, 17(1), 53–55.Google Scholar

Plomin, R. (2011). Commentary: Why are children in the same family so different? Non-shared environment three decades later. International Journal of Epidemiology, 40(3), 582–592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Plomin, R. (2013). Child development and molecular genetics: 13 years later. Child Development, 84, 104–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plomin, R., & Asbury, K. (2005). Nature and nurture: Genetic and environmental influences on behavior. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 600(1), 86–98.Google Scholar

Plomin, R., & Daniels, D. (2011). Why are children in the same family so different from one another? International Journal of Epidemiology, 40 (3), 563–582.Google Scholar

Plomin, R., Asbury, K., & Dunn, J. (2001). Why are children in the same family so different? Nonshared environment a decade later. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 46(3), 225–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Powers, N. R., Eicher, J. D., Butter, F., Kong, Y., Miller, L. L., Ring, S. M., et al. (2013). Alleles of a polymorphic ETV6 binding site in DCDC2 confer risk of reading and language impairment. American Journal of Human Genetics, 93(1), 19–28.Google Scholar

Quintilian Institutes of Oratory (trans. H. E. Butler) (1920). London: William Heinermann.Google Scholar

Randi, J., & Corno, L. (2005). Teaching and learner variation. Pedagogy: Teaching for learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology: Monograph Series II, 3, 47–69.Google Scholar

Randi, J. (Ed.). (2007). Research in the service of practice. Theory into Practice, 46 (4).Google Scholar

Randi, J. (2017). Teaching and learning hand in hand: Adaptive teaching and self-regulated learning. Teachers College Record, 119(13). Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord on April 21, 2017.Google Scholar

Reilly, C. (2012). Behavioural phenotypes and special educational needs: Is aetiology important in the classroom? Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56(10), 929–946.Google Scholar

Ridley, M. (1999). Genome: The autobiography of a species in 23 chapters. London, UK: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom. Urban Review, 3(1), 16–20.Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2008). Scientific talent, training, and performance: Intellect, personality, and genetic endowment. Review of General Psychology, 12(1), 28.Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2012). Teaching creativity current findings, trends, and controversies in the psychology of creativity. Teaching of Psychology, 39(3), 217–222.Google Scholar

Smagorinsky, P., Lakly, A., & Johnson, T. S. (2002). Acquiescence, accommodation, and resistance in learning to teach within a prescribed curriculum. English Education, 187–213.Google Scholar

Snow, R. (1989). Aptitude-treatment interaction as a framework for research on individual differences in learning. In Ackerman, P. L., Sternberg, R. J., & Glaser, R. (Eds.), Learning and individual differences: Advances in theory and research (pp. 13–59). New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Snyder, M., Grubert, F., Heffelfinger, C., Hariharan, M., Asabere, A., Waszak, S. M., … Snyder, M. (2010). Variation in transcription factor binding among humans. Science, 232–235. doi:10.1126/science.1183621Google Scholar

Solomon, D., Watson, M. S., Delucchi, K. L., Schaps, E., & Battistich, V. (1988). Enhancing children’s prosocial behavior in the classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 25(4), 527–554.Google Scholar

Stanford Aptitude Seminar, . (2002). Remaking the concept of aptitude: Extending the legacy of Richard E. Snow. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Stein, J. (2014). Dyslexia: The role of vision and visual attention. Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 1(4), 267–280.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R., & Grigorenko, E. (1999). Myths in psychology and education regarding the gene-environment debate. Teachers College Record, 100(3), 536–553.Google Scholar

Tan, M., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2013). All in the family: Is creative writing familial and heritable? Learning and Individual Differences, 28, 177–180.Google Scholar

Terman, L. M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius: Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Universtiy Press.Google Scholar

Thomas, M. S., Kovas, Y., Meaburn, E., & Tolmie, A. (2015) What can the study of genetics offer to educators? Working Paper #12077. Mind, Brain, and Education.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

True, W. R., Heath, A. C., Scherrer, J. F., Xian, H., Lin, N., Eisen, S. A., … Tsuang, M. T. (1999). Interrelationship of genetic and environmental influences on conduct disorder and alcohol and marijuana dependence symptoms. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 88(4), 391–397.Google Scholar

US Department of Energy Office of Science. (2003). Genomics and its impact on science and society: The Human Genome Project and beyond. Washington, DC: US Department of Energy. Available: http://www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/publicat/primer2001/PrimerColor.pdfGoogle Scholar

Venter, J. C., Adams, M. D., Myers, E. W., Li, P. W., Mural, R. J., Sutton, G. G., … Beasley, E. (2001). The sequence of the human genome. Science, 291(5507), 1304–1351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Walker, S. O., Petrill, S. A., Spinath, F. M., & Plomin, R. (2004). Nature, nurture and academic achievement: A twin study of teacher assessments of 7‐year‐olds. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(3), 323–342.Google Scholar

Woolfolk, A., & Perry, N.E. (2015). Child and adolescent development (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar