Book contents
Part III - Law
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 July 2017
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Companion to Natural Law Jurisprudence , pp. 243 - 456Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Works Cited
Alexy, R. 2002. A Theory of Constitutional Rights, trans. by Rivers, J.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, J. 1832/1955. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined. Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 1998. Aquinas: Moral, Political and Legal Theory. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J. 2011. Natural Law and Natural Rights second edition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, H.L.A. 1961/2012. The Concept of Law third edition, ed. Green, L.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F. 1821/1991. Elements of the Philosophy of Right, trans. Nisbet, H.B., ed. Wood, A.W.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 1751/1998. An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals ed. Beauchamp, T.L.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1797/1991. The Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. Gregor, M.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. 2004. Law as a Social System trans. Ziegert, K.. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, M.C. 2006. Natural Law in Jurisprudence and Politics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, R. 1978. ‘On Seeing Things Differently’. In eds. Beehler, R. and Drengson, A., The Philosophy of Society, Methuen.Google Scholar
Raz, J. 1992. ‘Formalism and the Rule of Law’. In ed. George, R.P. Natural Law Theory. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Simmonds, N. 2012. ‘The Logic of Planning and the Aim of Law’. University of Toronto Law Journal 62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmonds, N. 2013a. Central Issues in Jurisprudence fourth edition. Sweet and Maxwell.Google Scholar
Simmonds, N. 2013b. ‘The Bondwoman’s Son and the Beautiful Soul’. American Journal of Jurisprudence 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Works Cited
Berman, M. Forthcoming. ‘Of Law and Other Artificial Normative Systems’, in Plunkett, D., Shapiro, S. and Toh, K. (eds.). Dimensions of Normativity: New Essays in Jurisprudence and Metaethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. 2013. ‘A New Philosophy for International Law’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 41: 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J. 2000. ‘On the Incoherence of Legal Positivism’, Notre Dame Law Review, 75: 1597–1611.Google Scholar
Greenberg, M. 2004/2006. ‘How Facts Make Law’, Legal Theory, 10: 157–198. Corrected version reprinted in Exploring Law’s Empire: The Jurisprudence of Ronald Dworkin, Hershovitz, S. (ed.), pp. 225–264. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, M. 2006. ‘Hartian Positivism and Normative Facts: How Facts Make Law II’, in Exploring Law’s Empire: The Jurisprudence of Ronald Dworkin, Hershovitz, S. (ed.), pp. 265–290. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, M. 2007. ‘The Prism of Rules’. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1042121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, M. 2011a. ‘The Standard Picture and Its Discontents’, Oxford Studies in the Philosophy of Law, 1: 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, M. 2011b. ‘Legislation as Communication? Legal Interpretation and the Study of Linguistic Communication’, in Philosophical Foundations of Language in the Law. Marmor, A. and Soames, S., eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, M. 2016a. ‘How To Explain Things With Force’, Harvard Law Review 129: 1932.Google Scholar
Greenberg, M. 2016b. ‘Principles of Legal Interpretation,’ Available at http://philosophy.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Principles-of-Legal-Interpretation-2016.pdf.Google Scholar
Greenberg, M. 2017. ‘What Makes a Method of Legal Interpretation Correct? Legal Standards vs. Fundamental Determinants,’ Harvard Law Review Forum, 130: 105.Google Scholar
Greenberg, M. and Litman, H. 1998. ‘The Meaning of Original Meaning’, The Georgetown Law Journal, 86: 570–619.Google Scholar
Hart, H.L.A. 1994. The Concept of Law. (2nd edition.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sager, L. 1978. ‘Fair Measure: The Legal Status of Under-Enforced Constitutional Norms’. Harvard Law Review, 91: 1212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sager, L. 2016, ‘Putting Law in Its Place’ in The Legacy of Ronald Dworkin, Waluchow, W. & Sciaraffa, S. (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schauer, F. 1996. ‘Positivism as Pariah’, in The Autonomy of Law: Essays on Legal Positivism. George, R.P., ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press. 31–55.Google Scholar
Schaus, S. 2015. ‘How To Think About Law as Morality: A Comment on Greenberg and Hershovitz’, in Yale Law Journal Forum 123: 224–245. Available at: www.yalelawjournal.org/forum/how-to-think-about-law-as-morality.Google Scholar
Stavropoulos, N. 2012. ‘Obligations and the Legal Point of View’, in Marmor, A., ed., The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Law (Routledge).Google Scholar
Stavropoulos, N. 2014. ‘Legal Interpretivism’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2014 Edition), Zalta, E., ed. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/law-interpretivist/.Google Scholar
Stavropoulos, N. 2016. ‘Obligations and Social Practice’ (in Spanish translation), in Ludeña, L. Ramírez and Vilajosana, J., eds., Convencionalismo y derecho (Marcial Pons 2016).Google Scholar
Stavropoulos, N. MS. ‘Do We Still Need Interpretation?’ (unpublished ms, on file with author).Google Scholar
Waldron, J. 2013. ‘Jurisprudence for Hedgehogs’. Available at: www.ssrn.com/abstract=2290309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Works Cited
Alexy, R. 1989. A Theory of Legal Argumentation. The Theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification (first publ. 1978), trans. Adler, R. and MacCormick, N.. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Alexy, R. 1997b. ‘Bulygins Kritik des Richtigkeitsarguments.’ In Normative Systems in Legal and Moral Theory. Festschrift for Carlos E. Alchourrón and Eugenio Bulygin, eds. Valdés, E. Garzón, Krawietz, W., von Wright, G.H., and Zimmerling, R.. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot: 235–250Google Scholar
Alexy, R. 2000. ‘On the Thesis of a Necessary Connection Between Law and Morality: Bulygin’s Critique’. Ratio Juris 13: 138–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexy, R. 2002a. The Argument from Injustice. A Reply to Legal Positivism (first pub. 1992), trans. Paulson, S.L. and Paulson, B. Litschewski. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Alexy, R. 2002b. A Theory of Constitutional Rights (first publ. 1985), trans. Rivers, J.. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Alexy, R. 2003. ‘The Nature of Arguments about the Nature of Law’. In: Rights, Culture, and the Law. Themes from the Legal and Political Philosophy of Joseph Raz, eds. Meyer, L.H., Paulson, S.L., and Pogge, T.W.. Oxford University Press: 3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexy, R. 2006. ‘The Nature of Legal Philosophy’. In Philosophy of Law. Critical Concepts in Philosophy, ed. Bix, B.H.. London and New York: Routledge, vol. I: 21–32Google Scholar
Alexy, R. 2007a. ‘An Answer to Joseph Raz’. In: Law, Rights and Discourse. The Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy, ed. Pavlakos, G.. Oxford: Hart Publishing: 37–55Google Scholar
Alexy, R. 2007b. ‘The Weight Formula’. In Studies in the Philosophy of Law. Frontiers of the Economic Analysis of Law, eds. Stelmach, J., Brożek, B., and Załuski, W.. Cracow: Jagiellonian University Press: 9–27Google Scholar
Alexy, R. 2008a. ‘On the Concept and the Nature of Law’. Ratio Juris 21: 281–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexy, R. 2008b. ‘A Defence of Radbruch’s Formula’. In Lloyd’s Introduction to Jurisprudence, 8th ed., ed. Freeman, M.D.A.. London: Sweet & Maxwell and Thomson Reuters: 426–443Google Scholar
Alexy, R. 2012. ‘Law, Morality, and the Existence of Human Rights’. Ratio Juris 25: 2–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexy, R. 2013a. ‘Between Positivism and Non-Positivism? A Third Reply to Eugenio Bulygin’. In Neutrality and Theory of Law, eds. Beltrán, J. Ferrer, Moreso, J.J., and Papayannis, D.M.. Dordrecht: Springer: 225–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexy, R. 2013b. ‘Some Reflections on the Ideal Dimension of Law and on the Legal Philosophy of John Finnis’. The American Journal of Jurisprudence 58: 97–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexy, R. 2013c. ‘The Existence of Human Rights’. Archives for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, supplement 136: 9–18Google Scholar
Augustinus, 2006. De libero arbitrio, ed. Brachtendorf, J.. Paderborn: Ferdinand SchöninghGoogle Scholar
Austin, J.L. 1970 ‘A Plea for Excuses’. In: Austin, , Philosophical Papers, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press: 175–204Google Scholar
Beyleveld, D. and Brownsword, R. 2001. Human Dignity in Bioethics and Biolaw. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Bulygin, E. 1993. ‘Alexy und das Richtigkeitsargument’. In Rechtsnorm und Rechtswirklichkeit. Festschrift für Werner Krawietz, eds. Aarnio, A., Paulson, S.L., Weinberger, O., von Wright, G.H., and Wyduckel, D.. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot: 19–24Google Scholar
Bulygin, E. 2000. ‘Alexy’s Thesis of the Necessary Connection between Law and Morality’. Ratio Juris 13: 133–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulygin, E. 2013. ‘Alexy Between Positivism and Non-positivism’. In Neutrality and Theory of Law, eds. Beltrán, J. Ferrer, Moreso, J.J., and Papayannis, D.M.. Dordrecht: Springer: 49–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J. 2013. ‘Reflections and Responses’. In Reason, Morality, and Law. The Philosophy of John Finnis, eds. Keown, J. and George, R.P.. Oxford University Press: 459–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J. 2014. ‘Law as Fact and as Reason for Action: A Response to Robert Alexy on Law’s “Ideal Dimension”’, The American Journal of Jurisprudence 59: 85–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. 1996a. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Pluhar, W.S. and Kitcher, P.. Indianapolis: Hackett PublishingGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. 1996b. The Metaphysics of Morals. Metaphysical First Principles of the Doctrine of Right (first publ. 1797). In: Kant, I.. Practical Philosophy, trans. and ed. Gregor, M.J.. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, H. 1967. Pure Theory of Law, 2nd ed. (first publ. 1960), trans. Knight, M.. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radbruch, G. 2006. ‘Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law’ (first publ. 1946), trans. Paulson, B. Litschewski and Paulson, S., Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26: 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, J. 2003. ‘About Morality and the Nature of Law’. The American Journal of Jurisprudence 48: 1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, J. 2007. ‘The Argument from Justice, or How Not to Reply to Legal Positivism’. In Law, Rights and Discourse. The Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy, ed. Pavlakos, G.. Oxford: Hart Publishing: 17–35Google Scholar
Works Cited
Austin, J. 1832/1995. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, J. 2001. ‘Legal Positivism: 5½ Myths’. American Journal of Jurisprudence 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, R.P. 1996. ‘Preface’ In The Autonomy of Law, ed. George, R.P.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Green, L. 2013. ‘The Morality in Law’ In Reading H. L. A. Hart’s The Concept of Law, eds. d’Almeida, D., Dolcetti, A., and Edwards, J.. Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. 1934/2002. Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory, trans. Paulson, B. L. and Paulson, S. L.. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. 1945/1961. General Theory of Law and State, trans. Wedberg, A.. Russell and Russell.Google Scholar
Leiter, B. 2011. ‘The Demarcation Problem in Jurisprudence: A New Case for Skepticism’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiter, B. 2016. ‘Why Legal Positivism (Again)?’, University of Chicago Public Law Working Paper No. 442, accessible at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2323013.Google Scholar
Margolis, E. and Laurence, S., eds. 2007. Creations of the Mind: Theories of Artifacts and their Representation. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, M. 1992. ‘Law as a Functional Kind’. In Natural Law Theory: Contemporary Essays, ed. George, R.P.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, M.C. 2006. Natural Law in Jurisprudence and Politics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, M.C. 2012. ‘Defect and Deviance in Natural Law Jurisprudence’. In Institutional Reason: The Jurisprudence of Robert Alexy, ed. Klatt, M.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, M.C. 2013. ‘The Explanatory Role of the Weak Natural Law Thesis’. In Philosophical Foundations of the Nature of Law, ed. Waluchow, W. and Sciaraffa, S.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, J. 1994. ‘Authority, Law, and Morality’. In Ethics in the Public Domain. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, J. 2004. ‘Can There Be a Theory of Law?’ In Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory eds. Golding, M and Edmundson, W.. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schauer, F. 2012. ‘On the Nature of the Nature of Law’. Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. and Vanderveken, D. 1985. Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Soper, P. 1983. ‘Legal Theory and the Problem of Definition’. University of Chicago Law Review 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Works Cited
Annas, J. 1996. ‘Aristotle on Human Nature and Political Virtue’. Review of Metaphysics 49: 731–753.Google Scholar
Christiano, T. 2004, ‘The Authority of Democracy’. Journal of Political Philosophy 12: 266–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, C.E. 1978. ‘Yves R. Simon and “The Common Good”: A Note on the Concept’. Ethics 88: 233–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, J.M. 1999. Reason and Emotion: Essays on Ancient Moral Psychology and Ethical Theory. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duke, G. 2013. ‘Finnis on the Authority of Law and the Common Good’. Legal Theory 19: 44–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duke, G. 2016a. ‘Two Functions of Aristotle’s Common Advantage’. History of Political Thought 37: 195–215.Google Scholar
Duke, G. 2016b. ‘The Distinctive Common Good’. Review of Politics 78: 227–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duke, G. forthcoming. ‘Political Authority and the Common Good. Political Studies.Google Scholar
Dunbabin, J. 1982. ‘The Reception and Interpretation of Aristotle’s Politics’. In Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, eds. Kretzmann, N., Kenny, A., Pinborg, J. and Stump, E.. Cambridge University Press: 723–738.Google Scholar
Dupre, L. 1993. ‘The Common Good and the Open Society’. Review of Politics 55: 687–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enoch, D. 2012. ‘Authority and Reason-Giving’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89: 296–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J. 1984. ‘The Authority of Law in the Predicament of Contemporary Social Theory’. Notre Dame Journal of Legal Ethics and Public Policy 1: 115–137.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 1996. ‘Is Natural Law Theory Compatible with Limited Government?’ In Natural Law, Liberalism and Morality, ed. George, R.P.. Oxford University Press: 1–26Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 1998a. Aquinas: Moral, Political and Legal Theory. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J. 1998b. ‘Public Good: The Specifically Political Common Good in Aquinas’. In Natural Law and Moral Inquiry, ed. George, R.P.. Georgetown University Press: 174–210.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 2011a. Natural Law and Natural Rights, second edition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 2013. ‘Reflections and Responses’. In Reason, Morality, and Law, eds. Keown, J. and George, R.P.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frank, W.A. 2007. ‘Authority and the Common Good in Democratic Governance’. Review of Metaphysics 60: 813–832.Google Scholar
Grisez, G. 1993.The Way of the Lord Jesus Vol. 2: Leading a Christian Life. Franciscan Press.Google Scholar
Hershovitz, S. 2003. ‘Legitimacy, Democracy, and Razian Authority’. Legal Theory 9: 201–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempshall, M.S. 1999. The Common Good in Late Medieval Thought. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keys, M.M. 2006. Aquinas, Aristotle and the Promise of the Common Good. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraut, R. 2013. ‘Aristotle and Rawls on the Common Good’. In The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’s Politics, Deslauriers, M. and Destrée, P. eds. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Liddell, H. and Scott, R. 2000. Greek-English Lexicon (seventh edition). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, C. 1955. ‘Some Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle’s Politics’. History 36: 29–44.Google Scholar
McInerney, R. 1988. Art and Prudence in the Thought of Jacques Maritain. University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Miller, F.D. 1995. Nature, Justice and Rights in Aristotle’s Politics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, F.D. 2000. ‘Naturalism’. In The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought, eds. Rowe, C. and Schofield, M. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, F.D. 2009. ‘Aristotle on the Ideal Constitution’. In A Companion to Aristotle, ed. Anagnostopoulos, G.. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Morrison, D. 2013. ‘The Common Good’. In The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’s Politics, eds. Deslauriers, M. and Destrée, P.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, M.C. 2006. Natural Law in Jurisprudence and Politics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pakaluk, M. 2001. ‘Is the Common Good of Political Society Limited and Instrumental?’ Review of Metaphysics 55: 57–94.Google Scholar
Perry, S. 2013. ‘Political Authority and Obligation’. In Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Law, eds. Green, L. and Leiter, B.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, P.N. 2004. ‘The Common Good’. In Justice and Democracy: Essays for Brian Barry, eds. Dowding, K., Goodin, R.E. and Pateman, C.. Cambridge University Press: 150–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. 1999. A Theory of Justice revised edition. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, J. 1994. Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, A.J. 1979. Moral Principles and Political Obligation. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, Y.R. 1965. The Tradition of Natural Law: A Philosopher’s Reflections. Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Weithman, P.J. 1992. ‘Augustine and Aquinas on Original Sin and the Function of Political Authority’. Journal of the History of Philosophy 30: 353–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Works Cited
Finnis, J. 1991. Moral Absolutes: Tradition, Revision, and Truth. The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 2011a. Collected Essays Volume 1: Reason in Action. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J. 2011b. Collected Essays Volume III: Human Rights and Common Good. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J. 2011c. Collected Essays Volume V: Religion and Public Reasons. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J. 2014. ‘Judicial Law-Making and the ‘Living’ Instrumentalisation of the ECHR’. In eds. Barber, N.W., Ekins, R. and Yowell, P., Lord Sumption and the Limits of the Law. Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
George, F. 2003. ‘Law and Culture in the United States’. American Journal of Jurisprudence 48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, R.P. 1993. Making Men Moral: Civil Liberties and Public Morality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, P. 2006. ‘Interrogational Torture’. American Journal of Jurisprudence 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Works Cited
Austin, J. 1958. ‘The Ideal of Justice’. 2 University of British Columbia Legal Notes 347.Google Scholar
Brunnée, J. and Toope, S.J. 2010. Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, M. 1941. ‘Should Legal Thought Abandon Clear Distinctions?’ 36 Illinois Law Review 239.Google Scholar
Fuller, L.L. 1934. ‘American Legal Realism’. 82 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, L.L. 1941. ‘My Philosophy of Law’ in My Philosophy of Law: Credos of Sixteen American Scholars. Boston: Boston Book Co.Google Scholar
Fuller, L.L. 1949: ‘The Case of the Speluncean Explorers’. 62 Harvard Law Review 616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, L.L. 1954. ‘American Legal Philosophy at Mid-Century – A Review of Edwin W. Patterson’s Jurisprudence, Men and Ideas of the Law’. 6 Journal of Legal Education 457.Google Scholar
Fuller, L.L. 1956. ‘Human Purpose and Natural Law’. 53 Journal of Philosophy 697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, L.L. 1958b. ‘Positivism and Fidelity to Law – A Reply to Professor Hart’. 71 Harvard Law Review 630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, L.L. 1965. ‘A Reply to Professors Cohen and Dworkin’. 10 Villanova Law Review 655.Google Scholar
Fuller, L.L. 1968b. ‘Freedom as a Problem of Allocating Choice’. 112 Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 101.Google Scholar
Fuller, L.L. 1969b. ‘Human Interaction and the Law’. 14 American Journal of Jurisprudence 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, L.L. 1978. ‘The Forms and Limits of Adjudication. 92 Harvard Law Review 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H.L.A. 1958. ‘Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals’. 71 Harvard Law Review 593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H.L.A. 1965. ‘Lon L. Fuller: The Morality of Law’. 78 Harvard Law Review 1281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, N. 2010. ‘Out of the “Witches” Cauldron’? Reinterpreting the Context and Reassessing the Significance of the Hart-Fuller Debate’ in Cane, P. (ed), The Hart-Fuller Debate in the Twenty-First Century. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Mertens, T. 2002. ‘Radbruch and Hart on the Grudge Informer: A Reconsideration’. 15 Ratio Juris 186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, E. 1958. ‘On the Fusion of Fact and Value: A Reply to Professor Fuller’. 3 Natural Law Forum 77.Google Scholar
Rundle, K. 2012. Forms Liberate: Reclaiming the Jurisprudence of Lon L. Fuller. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Van der Burg, W. 2014. The Dynamics of Law and Morality: A Pluralist Account of Legal Interactionism. Ashgate.Google Scholar
Winston, K.I. 2001. The Principles of Social Order – Selected Essays of Lon L. Fuller. Portland: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar