Book contents
- Sociological Constitutionalism
- Sociological Constitutionalism
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Sociological Constitutionalism
- Part I National Constitutions and Sociological Method
- Part II Constitutional Sociology between the National and the Transnational
- Part III Constitutional Law and Transnational Society
- Index
- References
Part II - Constitutional Sociology between the National and the Transnational
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 October 2017
Book contents
- Sociological Constitutionalism
- Sociological Constitutionalism
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Sociological Constitutionalism
- Part I National Constitutions and Sociological Method
- Part II Constitutional Sociology between the National and the Transnational
- Part III Constitutional Law and Transnational Society
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Sociological Constitutionalism , pp. 133 - 264Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Bibliography
Ackerman, Bruce (1991), We the People, Vol I: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Albertin, Lothar (1974), ‘Faktoren eines Arrangements zwischen industriellem und politischem System in der Weimarer Republik’, in Mommsen, Hans, Petzina, Dietmar and Weisbrod, Bernd (eds), Industrielles System und politische Entwicklung in der Weimarer Republik. Düsseldorf: Droste, pp. 658–74.Google Scholar
Austin, John (1995 [1832]), The Province of Jurisprudence Determined, edited by Rumble, W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baily, Samuel L. (1967), Labor, Nationalism, and Politics in Argentina. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Bendix, Reinhard (1996), Nation-Building and Citizenship. Studies of Our Changing Social Order, new and enlarged edition. New Brunswick: Transaction Press.Google Scholar
Berman, Paul Schiff (2007), ‘A Pluralist Approach to International Law’. Yale Law Journal 32: 300–329.Google Scholar
Böhret, Carl (1966), Aktionen gegen die kalte Sozialisierung 1926–1930. Ein Beitrag zum Wirken ökonomischer Einflußverbände in der Weimarer Republik. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.Google Scholar
Branch, Daniel, and Cheeseman, Nicholas (2006), ‘The Politics of Control in Kenya: Understanding the Bureaucratic-Executive State, 1952–78.’ Review of African Political Economy 33: 11–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brysk, Alison (1994), The Politics of Human Rights in Argentina. Protest, Change, and Democratization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, Maxwell (2013), Strong Constitutions: Social-Cognitive Origins of the Separation of Powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caramani, Daniele (2004), The Nationalization of Politics. The Formation of National Electorates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caruso, Daniela (2006), ‘Private Law and State-Making in the Age of Globalization.’ New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 39(1): 1–74.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins, and Collier, David (1991), Shaping the Political Arena. Critical Junctures, The Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, Maria Lorena (2007), The Politics of Labor Reform in Latin America. Between Flexibility and Rights. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Costa Pinto, António (2011), ‘Ruling Elites, Political Institutions and Decision-Making in Fascist-Era Dictatorships: Comparative Perspectives’ in Pinto, António Costa (ed.), Rethinking the Nature of Fascism. Comparative Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 197–226.Google Scholar
Church, Clive (1981), Revolution and Red Tape. The French Ministerial Bureaucracy 1770–1850. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Epstein, Edward C. (1989), ‘Labor, Populism and Hegemonic Crisis in Argentina’ in Epstein, Edward C. (ed.), Labor Autonomy and the State in Latin America. Boston: Unwin Hyman, pp. 13–38.Google Scholar
Fasoli, Gina, and Sella, Pietro (eds) (1937), Statuti di Bologna dell’anno 1288, in 2 vols. Vatican: Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana.Google Scholar
Fassbender, Bardo (1998), ‘The United Nations Charter as Constitution of the International Community.’ Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 36(3): 539–619.Google Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, Andreas (2003), ‘Die Emergenz der Globalverfassung.’ Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 63: 717–760.Google Scholar
García, Antonio (1966), ‘Los sindicatos en el esquema de revolución nacional: El sindicalismo en la experiencia boliviana de nacionalización y desarrolo.’ El triestre económico 33(132(4)): 597–629.Google Scholar
Garon, Sheldon (1987), The State and Labor in Modern Japan. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gaudio, Ricardo, and Domeniconi, Héctor (1986), ‘Las primeras elecciones sindicales en la transición democrática.’ Desarrollo Económico 26(103): 423–454.Google Scholar
Gierke, Otto (1873), Das deutsche Genossenschaftsrecht, vol. II: Geschichte des deutschen Körperschaftsbegriffs. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Gironda, Vito Francesco (2010), Die Politik der Staatsbürgerschaft. Italien und Deutschland im Vergleich 1800–1914. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Gloria, Andrea (ed.) (1873), Statuti del Comune di Padova del secolo XII all’anno 1285. Padua: Sacchetta.Google Scholar
Gosewinkel, Dieter (2001), Einbürgern und Ausschließen. Die Nationalisierung der Staatsangehörigkeit vom Deutschen Bund bis zur Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Grimm, Dieter (2005), ‘The Constitution in the Process of Denationalization.’ Constellations 12 (2005): 447–463.Google Scholar
Grimm, Dieter (2009), ‘Gesellschaftlicher Konstitutionalismus – Eine Kompensation für den Bedutungssschwund der Staatsverfassung?’ in Herdegen, Matthias, Klein, Hans Hugo, Papier, Hans-Jürgen and Scholz, Rupert (eds), Staatsrecht und Politik. Festschrift für Roman Herzog zum 75. Geburtstag. Munich: Beck, pp. 67–81.Google Scholar
Grübler, Michael (1982), Die Spitzenverbände der Wirtschaft und das erste Kabinett Brüning: Vom Ende der Großen Koalition 1929/30 bis zum Vorabend der Bankenkrise 1931. Düsseldorf: Droste.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1992), Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hamann, Andrea and Fabri, Hélène Ruiz (2008), ‘Transnational Networks and Constitutionalism.’ International Journal of Constitutional Law 6(3–4): 481–508.Google Scholar
Hathaway, James C. (2005), The Rights of Refugees in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heller, Hermann (1971), Sozialismus und Nation, in Heller, , Gesammelte Schriften, Vol. I edited by Drath, Martin, in 3 vols. Leiden: Sijthoff, pp. 439–526.Google Scholar
Holmes, Stephen (1995), Passions and Constraint. On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Jessup, Philip C. (1959), The Use of International Law. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Law School.Google Scholar
Joerges, Christian (2014), ‘Legitimacy without Democracy in the EU? Perspectives on the Constitutionalization of Europe through Law’ in Maduro, Miguel, Tuori, Kaarlo and Sankari, Suvi (eds), Transnational Law: Rethinking European Law and Legal Thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 248–68.Google Scholar
Johnson, Chalmers (1982), MITI and the Japanese Miracle. The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975. Berkeley: California University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, Paul W. (1997), The Reign of Law. Marbury v. Madison and the Construction of America. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kanalan, Ibrahim (2014), Die universelle Durchsetzung des Rechts auf Nahrung gegen transnationale Unternehmen. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Kjaer, Poul (2014), ‘Toward a Sociology of Intermediary Institutions: The Role of Law in Corporatism, Neo-Corporatism, and Governance’ in Madsen, Mikael Rask and Thornhill, Chris (eds), Law and the Formation of Modern Europe. Perspectives from the Historical Sociology of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 117–141.Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, Peters, Anne and Ulfstein, Geir (2009), The Constitutionalization of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuo, Ming-Sung (2010), ‘The End of Constitutionalism As We Know It? Boundaries and the State of Global Constitutional (Dis)ordering’. Transnational Legal Theory 1(3): 329–369.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch (1950), International Law and Human Rights. London: Steven & Sons.Google Scholar
Leibholz, Gerhard (1957), ‘Einleitung: Der Status des Bundesverfassungsgerichts.’ Jahrbuch des öffentlichen Rechts, Neue Folge 6: 110–221.Google Scholar
Luebbert, Gregory M. (1987), ‘Social Foundations of Political Order in Interwar Europe’. World Politics 39(4): 449–478.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1984), ‘Widerstandsrecht und politische Gewalt’. Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 5(1): 36–45.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1997), Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Lutz, Ellen L. and Sikkink, Kathryn (2000), ‘International Human Rights Law and Practice in Latin America.’ International-Organization 54(3): 633–659.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl 1958–1968 [1844]. Zur Judenfragein Marx, and Engels, , Werke, in 43 vols. Berlin: Dietz, Vol. I pp. 347–377.Google Scholar
Mellis, Guido (1988), Due modelli di amministrazione tra liberalismo e fascismo. Burocrazie tradizionali e nuovi apparati. Rome: Ministro per i beni culturali.Google Scholar
Mittermaier, C. J. A. (1841), Die Strafrechtsgesetzgebung in ihrer Fortbildung geprüft, I. Heidelberg: Karl Winter.Google Scholar
Morgan, Kenneth O. (1979). Consensus and Disunity. The Lloyd George Coalition Government 1918–1922. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Munck, Gerardo L. (1998), Authoritarianism and Democratization. Soldiers and Workers in Argentina, 1976–1983. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Murillo, M. Victoria (1997), ‘La adaptación del sindicalismo argentino a las reformas de Mercado en la primera presidencia de Menem.’ Desarrolo Económico 37(147): 419–446.Google Scholar
Nautz, Jürgen P. (1985), Die Durchsetzung der Tarifautonomie in Westdeutschland. Das Tarifvertragsgesetz vom 9. April 1949. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
Nino, Carlos Santiago (1989), ‘Transition to Democracy, Corporatism and Constitutional Reform in Latin America.’ University of Miami Law Review 44: 129–164.Google Scholar
Ohler, Christoph (2015), ‘Die Rückkehr in die internationale Gemeinschaft. Das Bundesverfassungsgericht als Türhüter des offenen Staates’ in Fischer, Christian and Pauly, Walter (eds), Höchstrichterliche Rechtsprechung in der frühen Bundesrepublik. Tübingen: Mohr, pp. 27–42.Google Scholar
Parlamentarischer Rat (1949), Verhandlungen des Hauptausschusses 1948/49. Scheur: Bonner Universitäts-Buchdruckerei Gebr.Google Scholar
Patroni, Viviana (2001), ‘The Decline and Fall of Corporatism? Labour Legislation Reform in Mexico and Argentina during the 1990s.’ Canadian Journal of Political Science 34(2): 249–274.Google Scholar
Peruzzotti, Enrique (2001), ‘The Nature of the New Argentine Democracy. The Delegative Democracy Argument Revisited.’ Journal of Latin American Studies 33(1): 133–155Google Scholar
Peters, Anne (2014), Jenseits der Menschenrechte. Die Rechtsstellung des Individuums im Völkerrecht. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Rabkin, Jeremy A. (2007), Law without Nations? Why Constitutional Government Requires Sovereign States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ranis, Peter (1992), Argentine Workers. Peronism and Contemporary Class Consciousness. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Rebentisch, Dieter (1989), Führerstaat und Verwaltung im Zweiten Weltkrieg. Verfassungsentwicklung und Verwaltungspolitik 1939–1945. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Reinisch, August (2007), ‘The Immunity of International Organizations and the Jurisdiction of their Administrative Tribunals.’ Chinese Journal of International Law 7(2): 285–306.Google Scholar
Remmer, Karen L. (1989), ‘Neopatrimonialism: The Politics of Military Rule in Chile, 1973–1987.’ Comparative Politics 21(2): 149–170.Google Scholar
Renner, Moritz (2009) ‘Towards a Hierarchy of Norms in Transnational Law?’ Journal of International Arbitration 26(4): 533–555.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1975[1762]), Du contrat social et autres oeuvres politiques. Paris: Garnier.Google Scholar
Rütten, Wilhelm (1996), ‘Gewerkschaften und Arbeitsrecht nach dem Zweiten Weltkrieg (1945–1950/52)’ in Diestelkamp, Bernhard, Kitagawa, Zentarô, Kreiner, Josef, Murakami, Junichi, Nörr, Knut Wolfgang and Toshitani, Nobuyoshi (eds), Zwischen Kontinuität und Fremdbestimmung. Zum Einfluß der Besatzungsmächte auf die deutsche und japanische Rechtsordnung 1945 bis 1950. Tübingen: Mohr, pp. 149–166.Google Scholar
Sangmpam, S. N. (1993), ‘Neither Soft nor Dead: The African State Is Alive and Well.’ African Studies Review 36(2): 73–94.Google Scholar
Savigny, Friedrich Carl von (1840a[1814]), Vom Beruf unserer Zeit für Gesetzgebung. Heidelberg: J.C.B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Savigny, Friedrich Carl von (1840b), System des heutigen Römischen Rechts, vol. I, in 9 vols. Berlin: Veit und Comp.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl (1940 [1939]), ‘Über die zwei großen, Dualismen’ des heutigen Rechtssystems’ in Schmitt, Carl, Positionen und Begriffe im Kampf mit Weimar-Genf-Versailles. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 261–271.Google Scholar
Scholz, Rupert (1978), Pressefreiheit und Arbeitsverfassung. Verfassungsprobleme um Tendenzschutz und innere Pressefreiheit. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.Google Scholar
Schorkopf, Frank (2010), ‘Völkerrechtsfreundlichkeit und Völkerrechtsskepsis in der Rechtsprechung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts’ in Giegerich, Thomas (ed.), Der offene Verfassungsstaat des Grundgesetzes. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 131–158.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory (2012), ‘Transnational Process and State Change.’ Law & Social Inquiry 37(2): 229–264.Google Scholar
Shaw, Timothy (1982), ‘Beyond Neo-Colonialism: Varieties of Corporatism in Africa.’ The Journal of Modern African Studies 20(2): 239–261.Google Scholar
Sewell, William Hamilton (2008), Work and Revolution in France: The Language of Labor from the Old Regime to 1848. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sieyès, Emmanuel Joseph (1789b), Préliminaire de la constitution: Reconnaissance et exposition raisonnée des droits de l’homme & du citoyen. Versailles: Ph.-D. Pierres.Google Scholar
Sonenscher, Michael (1989), Work and Wages. Natural Law, Politics and the Eighteenth-Century French Trades. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang, and Schmitter, Philippe C. (1985), ‘Community, Market, State—and Associations? The Prospective Contribution of Interest Governance to Social Order.’ European Sociological Review 1(2): 119–138.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther (2012), Constitutional Fragments. Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thornhill, Chris (2011), A Sociology of Constitutions. Constitutions and State Legitimacy in Historical-Sociological Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thornhill, Chris (2016), A Sociology of Transnational Constitutions. Social Foundations of the Post-National Legal Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tucker, Tudor Thomas (1983 [1784]), ‘Conciliatory Hints, Attempting, by a Fair State of Matters, to Remove Party Prejudice’ in Hyneman, C. S. and Lutz, D. S. (eds), American Political writing during the founding era 1760–1805, edited in 2 vols. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, I, pp. 606–630.Google Scholar
Turgot, Anne-Robert-Jacques (1787[1775]), ‘Mémoire sur les Municipalités’, in Turgot, , Oeuvres Posthumes. Lausanne: n.p., pp. 1–181.Google Scholar
Unger, Moritz von (2008), Menschenrechte als transnationales Privatrecht. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot.Google Scholar
Verdross, Alfred (1926), Die Verfassung der Völkerrechtsgemeinschaft. Vienna: Springer.Google Scholar
Vorländer, Hans (2006), ‘Deutungsmacht – Die Macht der Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit’ in Vorländer, Hans (ed.), Die Deutungsmacht der Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 9–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahl, Rainer (2011) ‘Die Rolle staatlicher Verfassungen angesichts der Europäisierung und der Internationalisierung’ in Vesting, Thomas and Korioth, Stefan (eds), Der Eigenwert der Verfassungsgeschichte. Was bleibt von der Verfassung nach der Globalisierung? Tübingen: Mohr, pp. 355–378.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1921/22) Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriß der verstehenden Soziologie. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Weiler, Joseph H. H. (1991), ‘The Transformation of Europe.’ Yale Law Journal 100: 2404–2483.Google Scholar
Wienfort, Monika 2001. Patrimonialgerichte in Preussen. Ländliche Gesellschaft und bürgerliches Recht 1770–1848/49. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Wylde, Christopher (2011), ‘State, Society and Markets in Argentina: The Political Economy of Neodesarollismo under Néstor Kirchner, 2003–2007.’ Bulletin of Latin American Research 30(4): 436–452.Google Scholar
Young, Ernest A. (2003), ‘The Trouble with Global Constitutionalism.’ Texas International Law Journal 38: 527–546.Google Scholar
Zumbansen, Peer (2001), ‘Vergangene Zukunft des Völkerrechts.’ Kritische Justiz 34(1): 46–68.Google Scholar
Zumbansen, Peer (2010), ‘Transnational Legal Pluralism.’ Transnational Legal Theory 1(2): 141–189.Google Scholar
References
Abensour, Miguel (2002). ‘“Savage Democracy”and “Principle of Anarchy”’. Philosophy & Social Criticism 28(6): 703–726.Google Scholar
Anderson, Gavin W. (2013). ‘Societal Constitutionalism, Social Movements, and Constitutionalism from Below’. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20(2): 881–906.Google Scholar
Arato, Andrew (2011). ‘Regime Change, Revolution and Legitimacy in Hungary’, in Toth, G. A. (ed.). Constitution for a Disunited Nation: On Hungary’s 2011 Fundamental Law. New York/Budapest: Central European University Press: 35–58.Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack M. (2011). Constitutional Redemption. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack M., and Levinson, Sanford (1993). ‘Constitutional Grammar’. Texas Law Review 72: 1771.Google Scholar
Blecher, Michael (2006). ‘Law in Movement: Paradoxontology, Law and Social Movements’, in Dine, Janet and Fagan, Andrew (eds) Human Rights and Capitalism: A Multidisciplinary Perspective on Globalisation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar: 80–114.Google Scholar
Blokker, Paul (2010). ‘Democratic Ethics, Constitutional Dimensions, and Constitutionalisms’, in Febbrajo, Alberto and Sadurski, Wojciech (eds) East-Central Europe after Transition: Towards a New Socio-Legal Semantics. Farnham/Burlington: Ashgate: 73–98.Google Scholar
Blokker, Paul (2013). New Democracies in Crisis? A Comparative Constitutional Study of the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania and Slovakia. Series: Routledge Advances in European Politics, London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blokker, Paul (2015). ‘The European Crisis and Constitutional Claims from Below’, in Trenz, H. J., Guiraudan, V. and Ruzza, C. (eds) Europe in Crisis: The Unmaking of Political Union. Series in European Political Sociology. Basingstoke: Palgrave-MacMillan: 63–82.Google Scholar
Blokker, Paul (2016a). ‘EU Democratic Oversight and Domestic Deviation from the Rule of Law: Sociological Reflections’, in Closa, C. and Kochenov, D. (eds) Reinforcing the Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 249–69.Google Scholar
Blokker, Paul (forthcoming 2016b). ‘Constitutional Reform in Europe and Recourse to the People’, in Contiades, Xenophon and Fotiadou, Alkmene (eds) Participatory Constitutional Change. The people as amenders of the Constitution, London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blokker, Paul (ed.) (forthcoming, 2017). Constitutional Acceleration within the European Union and Beyond. Routledge Series in Constitutional Law.Google Scholar
Boltanski, Luc, and Thévenot, Laurent (2006). On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brunkhorst, Hauke (2005). Solidarity: From Civic Friendship to a Global Legal Community. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brunkhorst, Hauke (2014a). Critical Theory of Legal Revolutions: Evolutionary Perspectives. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Brunkhorst, Hauke (2014b). ‘“You Can Make It More Complicated” – Kapitalismus und Demokratie in Europa’. Neue Soziale Bewegungen 27(1): 37–45.Google Scholar
Castoriadis, Cornelius (1987), The Imaginary Institution of Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Castoriadis, Cornelius (1991). Philosophy, Politics, Autonomy, edited by Curtis, D. A.. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Antonin (2010). ‘Legal Professionals or Political Entrepreneurs? Constitution Making as a Process of Social Construction and Political Mobilization’. International Political Sociology 4(2): 107–123.Google Scholar
Cohen, Antonin, and Vauchez, Antoine (2008). ‘Back to the ‘Future of Europe’: A Political Sociology of EU Constitutional Saga’ RSC Working Paper 2008/33, Florence: European University Institute.Google Scholar
Colón‐Ríos, Joel I (2011). ‘Carl Schmitt and Constituent Power in Latin American Courts: The Cases of Venezuela and Colombia’. Constellations 18(3): 365–388.Google Scholar
Conservative Party (2014). Protecting Human Rights in the UK. The Conservatives’ Proposals for Changing Britain’s Human Rights Laws. London.Google Scholar
Contiades, Xenophon, and Fotiadou, Alkmene (2013). ‘Models of Constitutional Change’, in Contiades, Xenophon (ed.). Engineering Constitutional Change: A Comparative Perspective on Europe, Canada and the USA. London/New York: Routledge: 417–468.Google Scholar
Couso, Javier (2012). ‘Law, Rights and Social Change in Latin America: Competing Models of Constitutionalism in an Era of Uncertainty’, available at: http://www.derecho.uba.ar/academica/posgrados/2012_javier-couso.pdf.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant G. (eds) (2011). Lawyers and the Rule of Law in an Era of Globalization. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
DiEM25 (2016). ‘A Manifesto for Democratizing Europe’, available at: https://diem25.org/assets/documents/diem25_english_long.pdfGoogle Scholar
Dowdle, Michael W., and Wilkinson, Michael (2017). ‘On the Limits of Constitutional Liberalism: In Search of a Constitutional Reflexivity’, in Dowdle, Michael W. and Wilkinson, Michael (eds). Constitutionalism Beyond Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 17–37.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. (1998). ‘The Paradox of Democratic Regimes: Fragility and Transformability’. Sociological Theory 16(3): 211–238.Google Scholar
Ferrara, Alessandro (2014). The Democratic Horizon. Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Forst, Rainer (1999). ‘The basic right to justification: toward a constructivist conception of human rights’. Constellations 6.1: 35–60.Google Scholar
Frerichs, Sabine (2010), ‘Constitutional Ideal Types in the Global Age: A Sociological Review’, in Tuori, Kaarlo and Sankari, Suvi (eds) The Many Constitutions of Europe. London: Ashgate: 69–90.Google Scholar
Gewirtzman, Doni (2004). ‘Glory Days: Popular Constitutionalism, Nostalgia, and the True Nature of Constitutional Culture’. Georgetown Law Journal 93: 897–938.Google Scholar
Häberle, Peter (1975). ‘Die offene Gesellschaft der Verfassungsinterpreten: Ein Beitrag zur pluralistischen und prozessualen “Verfassungsinterpretation”’. Juristenzeitung: 297–305.Google Scholar
Hirschl, Ran (2004). ‘The Political Origins of the New Constitutionalism’. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 11(1): 71–108.Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary J. (2010). Constitutional Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kjaer, Poul F. (2009). ‘The Under-Complexity of Democracy’, in Calliess, Gralf-Peter et al. (eds) Soziologische Jurisprudenz. Festschrift fuer Gunther Teubner. Berlin: De Gruyter-Verlag: 531–42.Google Scholar
Kjaer, Poul F. (2014). Constitutionalism in the Global Realm: A Sociological Approach. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Komesar, Neil (2001). Law’s Limits: Rule of Law and the Supply and Demand of Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Komesar, Neil, and Maduro, Miguel Poiraes (2014), ‘Governance Beyond the States: A Constitutional and Comparative Institutional Approach for Global Governance’, in Komesar, Neil et al. (eds) Understanding Global Governance: Institutional Choice and the Dynamics of Participation. Florence: European University Institute: 3–28.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti (2007). ‘Constitutionalism as Mindset: Reflections on Kantian Themes about International Law and Globalization’. Theoretical Inquiries in Law 8(1): 9–36.Google Scholar
Kumm, Mattias. (2009). ‘The Cosmopolitan Turn in Constitutionalism: On the Relationship between Constitutionalism in and beyond the State’. Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Trachtman, Joel P. (eds) Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 258–325.Google Scholar
Landau, David (2013). ‘Abusive Constitutionalism’. University of California Davis Law Review 47: 189–260.Google Scholar
Loughlin, Martin, and Walker, Neil (2007). ‘Introduction’. Loughlin, Martin and Walker, Neil (eds). The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 1–8.Google Scholar
Nash, Kate (2014). ‘The Promise of Pragmatic Sociology, Human Rights, and the State’. Susen, Simon and Turner, Brian (eds) The Spirit of Luc Boltanski: Essays on the ‘Pragmatic Sociology of Critique’. London: Anthem Press: 351–368.Google Scholar
Nash, Kate (2009). The Cultural Politics of Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
NeJaime, Douglas (2013). ‘Constitutional Change, Courts, and Social Movements’. Michigan Law Review 111: 877–902.Google Scholar
Nolte, Detlef, and Schilling-Vacaflor, A. (eds) (2012). New Constitutionalism in Latin America. Promises and Practices. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Orgad, Liav (2015). The Cultural Defense of Nations: A Liberal Theory of Majority Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parau, Cristina E (2013). ‘The Dormancy of Parliaments: The Invisible Cause of Judiciary Empowerment in Central and Eastern Europe’. Representation 49(3): 267–280.Google Scholar
Pollicino, Oreste (2008). ‘The Italian Constitutional Court at the Crossroad between Constitutional Parochialism and Cooperative Constitutionalism’. European Constitutional Law Review: 363–382.Google Scholar
Přibáň, Jiří (2012). ‘Constitutionalism as Fear of the Political? A Comparative Analysis of Teubner’s Constitutional Fragments and Thornhill’s A Sociology of Constitutions’. Journal of Law and Society 39(3): 441–471.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Garavito, César (2011). ‘Toward a Sociology of the Global Rule of Law Field: Neoliberalism, Neoconstitutionalism, and the Contest over Judicial Reform in Latin America’, in Dezalay, Yves and Garth, Bryant G. (eds). Lawyers and the Rule of Law in an Era of Globalization. London/New York: Routledge: 155–181.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, Michel (2009). The Identity of the Constitutional Subject: Selfhood, Citizenship, Culture, and Community. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sciulli, David(1992). Theory of Societal Constitutionalism: Foundations of a Non-Marxistic Critical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec (2008). ‘Constitutions and Judicial Power’, in Caramani, D. (ed.) Comparative Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 162–173.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther (2012) Constitutional Fragments. Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Grahame (2015). ‘Review Essay: Socializing the Constitution?’ Economy and Society 44(3): 480–493.Google Scholar
Thornhill, Chris (2011). A Sociology of Constitutions. Constitutions and State Legitimacy in Historical-Sociological Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thornhill, Chris (2012a). ‘Contemporary Constitutionalism and the Dialectic of Constituent Power’. Global Constitutionalism 1(3): 369–404.Google Scholar
Thornhill, Chris (2012b). ‘The Formation of a European Constitution: An Approach from Historical-Political Sociology’. International Journal of Law in Context 8(3): 354–393.Google Scholar
Thornhill, Chris. (2016), ‘The Sociological Origins of Global Law’, in Febbrajo, Alberto and Corsi, Giancarlo (eds) Sociology of Constitutions, London/New York: Routledge: 99–124.Google Scholar
Thornhill, Chris, and Ashenden, Samantha (eds) (2010). Legality and Legitimacy: Normative and Sociological Approaches. Vol. 6. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Tully, James (1995). Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tuori, Kaarlo, and Sankari, Suvi (2010). The Many Constitutions of Europe. Ashgate Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Unlock Democracy. (2013). The Original Charter 88, available at: http://unlockdemocracy.org.uk/pages/the-original-charter-88.Google Scholar
Vauchez, Antoine (2008). ‘The Force of a Weak Field: Law and Lawyers in the Government of the European Union (For a Renewed Research Agenda)’. International Political Sociology 2(2): 128–144.Google Scholar
Vauchez, Antoine, and De Witte, Bruno (2013) (eds). Lawyering Europe: European law as a transnational social field. Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishers.Google Scholar
Vitale, Ermanno (2010). Difendersi dal potere: per una resistenza costituzionale. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Wiener, Antje (2007). ‘Contested Meanings of Norms: A Research Framework’. Comparative European Politics, 5(1): 1–17.Google Scholar
Wiener, Antje (2008). The Invisible Constitution of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Michael A. (2013). ‘Political Constitutionalism and the European Union’. Modern Law Review 76: 191–222.Google Scholar
Bibliography
Abromeit, Heidrun (1995). ‘Volkssouveränität, Parlamentssouveränität, Verfassungssouveränität: Drei Realmodelle der Legitimation staatlichen Handelns’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift 36(1): 49–66.Google Scholar
Alexander, Larry (ed.) (1998). Constitutionalism. Philosophical Foundations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Armitage, David (1997). Bolingbroke. Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bellamy, Richard, and Castiglione, Dario (eds) (1996). ‘Constitutionalism in Transformation: European and Theoretical Perspectives’. Special Issue Political Studies 44(3).Google Scholar
Blänkner, Reinhard (1996). ‘Die Idee der Verfassung in der politischen Kultur des 19. Jahrhunderts in Deutschland’, in Münkler, Herfried (ed.). Bürgerreligion und Bürgertugend: Debatten über die vorpolitischen Grundla gen politischer Ordnung. Baden-Baden: Nomos: 309–341.Google Scholar
Blänkner, Reinhard (2002). ‘Integration durch Verfassung? Die „Verfassung“ in den institutionellen Symbolordnungen des 19. Jahrhunderts in Deutschland’, in Vorländer, Hans (ed.). Integration durch Verfassung. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag: 213–236.Google Scholar
Brodocz, André (2003). Die symbolische Dimension der Verfassung. Ein Beitrag zur Institutionentheorie. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Brodocz, André (2004). ‘Die symbolische Dimension konstitutioneller Institutionen. Über kulturwissenschaftliche Ansätze in der Verfassungstheorie’, in Schwelling, Birgit (ed.). Politikwissenschaft als Kulturwissenschaft. Theorien, Methoden, Problemstellungen. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag: 131–150.Google Scholar
Burgess, Glenn (1992). The Politics of the Ancient Constitution. An Introduction to English Political Thought 1603–1642. London: Macmillan Education.Google Scholar
Carnwarth, Robert (2004). ‘Do We Need a Supreme Court?’, The Political Quarterly 75(3): 249–256Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst (1994). Philosophie der symbolischen Formen. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Clayton, Cornell W., and Gillman, Howard (eds) (1999). Supreme Court Decision-Making. New Institutionalist Approaches. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Colliard, Jean-Claude, and Jégouzo, Yves (eds) (2001). Le nouveau constitutionnalisme. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
Corwin, Edward S. (1936). ‘The Constitution as Instrument and as Symbol’, American Political Science Review 30: 1071–1085.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. (1957). ‘Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker’, Journal of Public Law 6(2): 279–295.Google Scholar
Dobner, Petra, and Loughlin, Martin (eds) (2010). The Twilight of Constitutionalism? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon, and Slagstad, Rune (ed.) (1988). Constitutionalism and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Favoreu, Louis (1990). ‘Le droit constitutionnel, droit de la Constitution et constitution du droit’, Revue française de droit constitutionnel 1: 71–89.Google Scholar
Fisher, Louis (1988). Constitutional Dialogues. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, Michael (1999). The Politics of the British Constitution, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Frankenberg, Günter (2002). ‘Zur Rolle der Verfassung im Prozess der Integration’, in Vorländer, Hans (ed.), Integration durch Verfassung. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag: 43–69.Google Scholar
Frankenberg, Günter (2006). ‘Comparing Constitutions: Ideas, ideals, and ideology – toward a layered narrative’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 4(3): 439–459.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Manfred (1972). ‘Die Grundlagendiskussion in der Weimarer Staatsrechtslehre’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift 13: 582–598.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Manfred (1977). ‘Der Methoden- und Richtungsstreit. Zur Grundlagendiskussion der Weimarer Staatsrechtslehre’, Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts 102: 161–209.Google Scholar
Gebhardt, Jürgen (1995). ‘Die Idee der Verfassung. Symbol und Instrument’, in Kimmel, Adolf, (ed.), Verfassungen als Fundament und Instrument der Politik. Baden-Baden: Nomos: 9–23.Google Scholar
Gebhardt, Jürgen (2001). ‘Verfassung und Symbolizität’, in Melville, Gert (ed.), Institutionalität und Symbolisierung. Verstetigungen kultureller Ordnungsmuster in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart. Köln, Weimar and Wien: Böhlau: 585–601.Google Scholar
Gerber, Carl F. von (1869). Grundzüge eines Systems des Deutschen Staatsrechts. 2. Aufl. Leipzig: TauchnitzGoogle Scholar
Gillman, Howard, and Clayton, Cornell W. (eds) (1999). The Supreme Court in American Politics. New Institutionalist Interpretations. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Göhler, Gerhard (1997). Institution – Macht – Repräsentation. Wofür politische Institutionen stehen und wie sie wirken. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Grimm, Dieter (1973). ‘Staatsrechtslehre und Politikwissenschaft’, in Grimm, Dieter (ed.), Rechtswissenschaft und Nachbarwissenschaften, 1. Bd. Frankfurt/M.: Athenäum: 53–67.Google Scholar
Häberle, Peter (1996). Verfassung als öffentlicher Prozess. Materialien zu einer Verfassungstheorie der offenen Gesellschaft. Zweite, erweiterte Aufl., Berlin: Duncker and Humblot.Google Scholar
Häberle, Peter (1998). Verfassungslehre als Kulturwissenschaft. Zweite, stark erweiterte Aufl., Berlin: Duncker and Humblot.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A., and Taylor, Rosemary C. R. (1996). ‘Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms’, Political Studies 44: 936–957.Google Scholar
Hesse, Konrad (1978). ‘Die normative Kraft der Verfassung’, in Friedrich, Manfred (ed.), Verfassung. Beiträge zur Verfassungstheorie. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft: 77–99.Google Scholar
Hazell, Robert, and Sinclair, David (1999). ‘The British Constitution in 1997–98: Labour’s Constitutional Revolution’, Parliamentary Affairs 52(2): 161–178.Google Scholar
Hughes, Charles E. (1916). ’Speech Before the Elmira Chamber of Commerce, May 3, 1907’, in Addresses of Charles Evans Hughes 1906–1916. New York and London: G.P. Putnam’s Sons: 179–192.Google Scholar
Jellinek, Georg, (1959). Allgemeine Staatslehre. 3. Aufl. 1914, 6. Nachdruck. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Kastendiek, Hans (2001). ‘Traditionelles und neues Verfassungsdenken in Großbritannien’, in Glaeßner, Gert-Joachim et al. (ed.), Verfassungspolitik und Verfassungswandel. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag: 29–49.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans (1928). Der soziologische und der juristische Staatsbegriff. Kritische Untersuchung des Verhältnisses von Staat und Recht. 2. Aufl., Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Kumm, Matthias (2009). ‘The Cosmopolitan Turn in Constitutionalism: On the Relationship between Constitutionalism in and beyond the state’, in Dunoff, Jeffrey, and Trachtmann, Joel P. (eds.), Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 258–324.Google Scholar
Laband, Paul (1877). Das Staatsrecht des Deutschen Reiches. 2. Bd., 1. Aufl., Tübingen: Laupp.Google Scholar
Llanque, Marcus, and Schulz, Daniel (eds) (2015). Verfassungsidee und Verfassungspolitik. Berlin, München, Boston: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Loughlin, M., and Walker, N. (eds) (2007). The Paradox of Constitutionalism. Constituent Power and Constitutional Form. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Loveland, Ian (1999). ‘Incorporating the European Convention on Human Rights into UK Law’, Parliamentary Affairs 52(1): 113–127.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair (1984). Against the Self-Images of the Age: Essays on Ideology and Philosophy. Notre Dame, IN:University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Maer, Lucinda et al. (2004). ‘The Constitution: Dragging the Constitution out of the Shadows?’, Parliamentary Affairs 57(2): 253–268.Google Scholar
Manow, Phillip (2008). Im Schatten des Königs. Die politische Anatomie demokratischer Repräsentation, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Melville, Gert (ed.) (2001). Institutionalität und Symbolisierung. Verstetigungen kultureller Ordnungsmuster in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart. Köln, Wien and Weimar: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Melville, Gert, and Vorländer, Hans (eds) (2002). Geltungsgeschichten. Über die Stabilisierung und Legitimierung institutioneller Ordnungen. Köln, Weimar and Wien: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew (2006). ‘What Can We Learn from the Collapse of the European Constitutional Project?’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift 47(2): 219–241.Google Scholar
Nolte, Paul (1993). ‘Die Badischen Verfassungsfeste im Vormärz’, in Hettling, Manfred and Nolte, Paul (eds), Bürgerliche Feste. Symbolische Formen politischen Handelns im 19. Jahrhundert. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck: 63–94.Google Scholar
Pocock, John G. A. (1987). The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law: A Study of English Historical Thought in the 17th Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Preuß, Ulrich K. (1994).‘Einleitung: Der Begriff der Verfassung und ihre Beziehung zur Politik’, in Preuß, (ed.), Zum Begriff der Verfassung. Die Ordnung des Politischen. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Google Scholar
Rehberg, Karl-Siegbert, (2014). Symbolische Ordnungen. Beiträge zu einer soziologischen Theorie der Institutionen, edited. Vorländer, Hans. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Dominique (1997). Sur le Conseil constitutionnel, la doctrine Badinter et la démocratie. Paris: Descartes & Cie.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Dominique (1990). ‘Une Résurrection: La Notion de Constitution’, Revue du droit public et de la science politique en France et à l’étranger 1: 5–22.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Dominique (1999a). ‘La Constitution ou la politique autrement’, Le débat 64: 182–186.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Dominique (1999b). ‘La jurisprudence constitutionelle: quelle ‘nécessité démocratique?’, in Drago, Guillaume et al. (eds), La légitimité de la jurisprudence du Conseil constitutionnel. Paris: Economica: 363–376.Google Scholar
Scheppele, Kim Lane (2004). ‘Constitutional Ethnography: An Introduction’, in Law and Society Review 38, 389–406.Google Scholar
Schieren, Stefan (2001). Die stille Revolution, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Rainer (2012). Verfassungskultur und Verfassungssoziologie. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Rainer (2015).‘ Verfassungssoziologie als Kulturwissenschaft. Zur Spannung von rechtlichen und sozialen Normen’, in Llanque, Marcus and Schulz, Daniel (eds), Verfassungssidee und Verfassungspolitik. Berlin, München, Boston: de Gruyter: 117–136.Google Scholar
Schröder, Hans-Christoph (2002). ‘Ancient Constitution. Vom Nutzen und Nachteil der ungeschriebenen Verfassung Englands’, in Vorländer, Hans (ed.), Integration durch Verfassung. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag: 137–212.Google Scholar
Schulz, Daniel (2004). Verfassung und Nation. Formen politischer Institutionalisierung in Deutschland und Frankreich. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Schwelling, Birgit (ed.) (2004). Politikwissenschaft als Kulturwissenschaft. Theorien, Methoden, Problemstellungen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Seibel, Wolfgang (1997). ‘Historische Analyse und politikwissenschaftliche Institutionenforschung’, in Benz, Arthur and Seibel, Wolfgang (eds), Theorieentwicklung in der Politikwissenschaft – eine Zwischenbilanz. Baden-Baden: Nomos: 357–376.Google Scholar
Smend, Rudolf (1968). Staatsrechtliche Abhandlungen und andere Aufsätze. 2. Aufl., Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Stollberg-Rilinger, Barbara (2003). ‘Verfassung und Fest. Überlegungen zur festlichen Inszenierung vormoderner und moderner Verfassungen’, in Becker, Hans-Jürgen (ed.), Interdependenzen zwischen Verfassung und Kultur. Beiheft Der Staat 15. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot: 7–37.Google Scholar
Stollberg-Rilinger, Barbara (2004). ‘Symbolische Kommunikation in der Vormoderne. Begriffe – Thesen – Forschungsperspektiven’, Zeitschrift für Historische Forschung 31: 489–527.Google Scholar
Stollberg-Rilinger, Barbara (2008). Des Kaisers alte Kleider. Verfassungsgeschichte und Symbolsprache des Alten Reiches. München: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec (2000). Governing with Judges. Constitutional Politics in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. (2005). ‘Fighting for the Supreme Court’, in Harper’s, 311(1864) September 2005: 31–39.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther (2011). ‘Das Projekt der Verfassungssoziologie. Irritationen des nationalstaatlichen Konstitutionalismus’, Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 32; 189–204.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther (2012). Verfassungsfragmente. Gesellschaftlicher Konstitutionalismus in der Globalisierung. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Thornhill, Chris (2011). A Sociology of Constitutions. Constitutions and State Legitimacy in Historical-Sociological Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vanberg, Georg (2009). The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vibert, Frank (1999). ‘British Constitutional Reform and the Relationship with Europe’, in Hazell, Robert and O’Leary, Brendan (eds), Constitutional Futures. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 47–66.Google Scholar
Vogel, Wolfram (2001). ‘Demokratie und Verfassung in der V. Republik, Opladen: Budrich.Google Scholar
Vorländer, Hans (1981). Verfassung und Konsens. Der Streit um die Verfassung in der Grundlagen- und Grundgesetz-Diskussion der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Vorländer, Hans (1987). ‘Forum Americanum. Kontinuität und Legitimität der Verfassung der Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika 1787–1987’, Jahrbuch des Öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart 36: 451–488.Google Scholar
Vorländer, Hans (1988). ‘Verfassungsverehrung in Amerika.Zum konstitutionellen Symbolismus in den USA’, Amerikastudien 34: 69–82.Google Scholar
Vorländer, Hans (1999). ‘Verfassung und politische Kultur. Anmerkungen aus aktuellem Anlaß’, in Gebhardt, Jürgen (ed.), Verfassung und politische Kultur. Baden-Baden: Nomos: 75–83.Google Scholar
Vorländer, Hans (2002a). ‘Integration durch Verfassung? Die symbolische Bedeutung der Verfassung im politischen Prozeß’, in Vorländer, Hans (ed.), Integration durch Verfassung. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag: 9–40.Google Scholar
Vorländer, Hans (2002b). ‘Gründung und Geltung. Die Konstitution der Ordnung und die Legitimität der Konstitution’, in Melville, Gert, and Vorländer, Hans (eds), Geltungsgeschichten. Über die Stabilisierung und Legitimierung institutioneller Ordnungen. Köln, Weimar and Wien: Böhlau: 243–263.Google Scholar
Vorländer, Hans (2004a). ‘Verfassungsgeschichten. Über die Kontinuierung des konstitutionellen Moments’, in Melville, Gert and Rehberg, Karl-Siegbert (eds): Gründungsmythen – Genealogien – Memorialzeichen. Beiträge zur institutionellen Konstruktion von Kontinuität. Köln, Weimar and Wien: Böhlau: 177–185.Google Scholar
Vorländer, Hans (2004b). ‘Die drei Entwicklungswege des Konstitutionalismus in Europa’, in Institut für Europäische Verfassungswissenschaften. Berlin: Die Europäische Verfassungsordnung: 21–42.Google Scholar
Vorländer, Hans (2005). ‘Hinter dem Schleier des Nichtpolitischen. Das unsichtbare Verfassungsgericht’, in Melville, Gert (ed.), Das Sichtbare und das Unsichtbare der Macht. Institutionelle Prozesse in Antike, Mittelalter und Neuzeit. Köln, Weimar and Wien: Böhlau: 113–129.Google Scholar
Vorländer, Hans (2006a). ‘Die Verfassung als symbolische Ordnung. Perspektiven einer kulturwissenschaftlich-institutionalistischen Verfassungstheorie’, in Becker, Michael and Zimmerling, Ruth (ed.), Politik und Recht. PVS-Sonderheft, Sonderheft 36(2006): 229–249.Google Scholar
Vorländer, Hans (ed.) (2006b). Die Deutungsmacht der Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Vorländer, Hans (2007). ‘Europas multiple Konstitutionalismen’, Zeitschrift für Staats- und Europawissenschaften 5(2): 160–180.Google Scholar
Vorländer, Hans (2009). Die Verfassung – Idee und Geschichte, 3rd ed. München: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Vorländer, Hans (2010). ‘Verfassungen und Rituale in Vormoderne und Moderne’, in ed. Kitts, Margo et al. (ed.), Ritual Dynamics and the Science of Ritual. Volume III: State, Power and Violence. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz: 135–147.Google Scholar
Vorländer, Hans (2012a). ‘What is Constitutional Culture?’, in Hensel, Silke et al. (eds), Constitutional Cultures: On the Concept and Representation of Constitutions in the Atlantic World. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing: 21–42.Google Scholar
Vorländer, Hans (2012b). ‘Die Verfassung vor, nach, über und unter dem Staat. Die Konstitutionalismusdebatte in der Suche nach einem modernen Verfassungsbegriff’, in Lindemann, Helena et al. (eds), Erzählungen vom Konstitutionalismus. Baden-Baden: Nomos: 23–42.Google Scholar
Vorländer, Hans (2014). ‘Abschied vom methodologischen Etatismus. Vorüberlegungen zu einer Entwicklungsgeschichte des Konstitutionalismus in Europa’, in Lehnert, Detlef (ed.), Konstitutionalismus in Europa. Entwicklung und Interpretation. Köln, Weimar, Wien: Böhlau: 47–62.Google Scholar
Vorländer, Hans, and Melville, Gert (2002). ‘Geltungsgeschichten und Institutionengeltung’, in Melville, Gert and Vorländer, Hans (eds), Geltungsgeschichten. Über die Stabilisierung und Legitimierung institutioneller Ordnungen. Köln and Weimar and Wien: Böhlau: IX–XV.Google Scholar
Vorländer, Hans, and Schaal, Gary S (2002). ‘Integration durch Institutionenvertrauen? Das Bundesverfassungsgericht und die Akzeptanz seiner Rechtsprechung’, in Vorländer, Hans (ed.), Integration durch Verfassung. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag: 343–374.Google Scholar
Vorländer, Hans, Herrmann, Dietrich and Schaal, Gary S. (2003). ‘The Triumph of Constitutionalism in 20th Century’, in Georgi-Findlay, Brigitte and Mohr, Hans-Ulrich (eds.), Millennial Perspectives: Lifeworlds and Utopias. Heidelberg: 227–247.Google Scholar
Vorländer, Hans, and Brodocz, André (2005). ‘Das Vertrauen in das Bundesverfassungsgericht. Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsumfrage’, in Vorländer, Hans (ed.), Die Deutungsmacht der Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften: 259–295.Google Scholar
Weiler, Joseph H. H. (1991). ‘The Transformation of Europe’, Yale Law Journal 100: 2403–2483.Google Scholar
Weiler, Joseph H. H., and Wind, M. (eds.) (2003). European Constitutionalism Beyond the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wiener, Antje (2012). The Invisible Constitution of Politics. Contested Norms and International Encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith E. (1999). Constitutional Interpretation. Textual Meaning, Original Intent, and Judicial Review. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Wyrzykowski, Miroslaw (ed.) (2001). Constitutional Cultures. Warschau: Institute of Public Affairs.Google Scholar
References
Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael (eds) (1998). Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Albert, Gert (2007). ‘Idealtypen und das Ziel der Soziologie’, Berliner Journal für Soziologie, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 51–75.Google Scholar
Beckert, Jens and Streeck, Wolfgang, (2008). ‘Economic Sociology and Political Economy: A Programmatic Perspective’. MPIfG Working Paper 08/4, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies [http://www.mpifg.de/pu/workpap/wp08-4.pdf].Google Scholar
Berman, Harold J. (2003). Law and Revolution, II. The Impact of the Protestant Reformations on the Western Legal Tradition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Blokker, Paul (2012). ‘Constitutions and Democracy in Post-National Times: A Political-Sociological Approach’, Irish Journal of Sociology, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 68–90.Google Scholar
Callon, Michel (1998). ‘Introduction: The Embeddedness of Economic Markets in Economics’, in Callon, Michel (ed.), The Laws of the Markets. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 1–57.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile, 1984 [orig. 1893]. The Division of Labour in Society. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B. (2004). ‘Rivers of Law and Contested Terrain: A Law and Society Approach to Economic Rationality’, Law and Society Review, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 181–197.Google Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, Andreas, and Teubner, Gunther (2004). ‘Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search For Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law’, Michigan Journal of International Law, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 999–1046.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (2008). The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979 (edited by Sennelart, Michel). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Frerichs, Sabine (2008). Judicial Governance in der europäischen Rechtsgemeinschaft: Integration durch Recht jenseits des Staates. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Frerichs, Sabine (2009). ‘The Legal Constitution of Market Society: Probing the Economic Sociology of Law’, Economic Sociology – European Electronic Newsletter, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 20–25 [http://econsoc.mpifg.de/archive/econ_soc_10–3.pdf].Google Scholar
Frerichs, Sabine (2010). ‘Constitutional Ideal Types in the Global Age: A Sociological Review’, in Tuori, Kaarlo and Sankari, Suvi (eds), The Many Constitutions of Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 69–88.Google Scholar
Frerichs, Sabine (2011). ‘Re-embedding Neo-liberal Constitutionalism: A Polanyian Case for the Economic Sociology of Law’, in Joerges, Christian, and Falke, Josef (eds), Karl Polanyi, Globalisation and the Potential of Law in Transnational Markets. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 65–84.Google Scholar
Frerichs, Sabine (2012). What Constitutes the Market Society? Studies in the Economic Sociology of Law. Habilitation thesis, University of Bamberg.Google Scholar
Frerichs, Sabine (2016). ‘The Law of Market Society: A Sociology of International Economic Law and Beyond’, Finnish Yearbook of International Law 2012/2013, Vol. 23, pp. 173–237.Google Scholar
Gephart, Werner (1993). Gesellschaftstheorie und Recht: Das Recht im soziologischen Diskurs der Moderne. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Gephart, Werner (2003). Einführung in die Rechtssoziologie Max Webers. Vorlesung im Sommersemester 2003. [https://www.politik-soziologie.uni-bonn.de/de/institut/lehrkoerper/kaete-hamburger-kolleg-recht-als-kultur/prof.-dr.-werner-gephart/Gephart_Webers_Rechtssoziologie_SS03.doc].Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark (1985). ‘Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 91, No. 3, pp. 481–510.Google Scholar
Grundmann, Stefan (2008). ‘The Concept of the Private Law Society: After 50 Years of European and European Business Law’, European Review of Private Law, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 553–581.Google Scholar
Heise, Michael (2013). Emerging from the Euro Debt Crisis: Making the Single Currency Work. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Hirst, Paul (1994). Associative Democracy: New Forms of Economic and Social Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, Christopher (2014). ‘“Whatever It Takes”: Polanyian Perspectives on the Eurozone Crisis and the Gold Standard’, Economy and Society, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 582–602.Google Scholar
Joerges, Christian (2005). ‘What is Left of the European Economic Constitution? A Melancholic Eulogy’, European Law Review, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 461–489.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan (2006). ‘Three Globalizations of Law and Legal Thought: 1850–2000’, in Trubek, David M. and Santos, Alvaro (eds.), The New Law and Economic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–73.Google Scholar
Lang, Andrew T.F. (2013). ‘The Legal Construction of Economic Rationalities’, Journal of Law and Society, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 155–171.Google Scholar
Lindbekk, Tore (1992). ‘The Weberian Ideal-type: Development and Continuities’, Acta Sociologica, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 285–297.Google Scholar
Menéndez, Agustín José (2013) ‘The Existential Crisis of the European Union’, German Law Journal, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 453–526.Google Scholar
Michaels, Ralf (2009). ‘Global Legal Pluralism’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, Vol. 5, pp. 243–262.Google Scholar
Michaels, Ralf (2011). ‘Of Islands and the Ocean: The Two Rationalities of European Private Law’, in Brownsword, Roger, Micklitz, Hans-W., Niglia, Leone, Weatherill, Stephen (eds), The Foundations of European Private Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 139–158.Google Scholar
Münch, Richard and Frerichs, Sabine (2008). ‘Markt und Moral: Transnationale Arbeitsteilung und Netzwerksolidarität’, in Maurer, Andrea (ed.), Handbuch der Wirtschaftssoziologie. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 394–410.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich (1872). Die Geburt der Tragödie aus dem Geiste der Musik. Leipzig: Verlag von F. W. Fritzsch.Google Scholar
O’Hara, Erin A. and Ribstein, Larry E. (2009). The Law Market. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ortino, Federico and Ortino, Matteo (2008). ‘Law of the Global Economy: In Need of a New Methodological Approach?’, in Picker, Colin B., Bunn, Isabella D. and Arner, Douglas W. (eds), International Economic Law: The State and Future of the Discipline. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 89–106.Google Scholar
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich (2011), ‘The Future of International Economic Law: A Research Agenda’, in Joerges, Christian and Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich (eds.), Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and International Economic Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 533–575.Google Scholar
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich (2012). ‘Methodological Pluralism and Its Critics in International Economic Law Research’, Journal of International Economic Law, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 921–970.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl (1996) [orig. 1947]. ‘Our Obsolete Market Mentality’, in Swedberg, Richard (ed.), Economic Sociology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 146–154.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl (2001) [orig. 1957]. ‘The Economy as Instituted Process’, in Granovetter, Mark and Swedberg, Richard (eds.), The Sociology of Economic Life (second edition). Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 31–50.Google Scholar
Rex, John, (1977). ‘Value-Relevance, Scientific Laws, and Ideal Types: The Sociological Methodology of Max Weber’, Canadian Journal of Sociology, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 151–166.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard (1982). ‘International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order’, International Organization, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 379–415.Google Scholar
Sauter, Wolf (1998). ‘The Economic Constitution of the European Union’, Columbia Journal of European Law, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 27–68.Google Scholar
Sciarra, Silvana (2001). ‘Integration Through Courts: Article 177 as a Pre-federal Device’, in Sciarra, Silvana (ed.), Labour Law in the Courts. National Judges and the European Court of Justice. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang (2009). Re-forming Capitalism: Institutional Change in the German Political Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Supiot, Alain (2007). Homo Juridicus: On the Anthropological Function of the Law. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Swedberg, Richard (2003). ‘The Case for an Economic Sociology of Law’, Theory and Society, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 1–37.Google Scholar
Swedberg, Richard (2006). ‘Max Weber’s Contribution to the Economic Sociology of Law’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, Vol. 2, pp. 61–81.Google Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian Z. (2008). ‘Understanding Legal Pluralism: Past to Present, Local to Global’, Sydney Law Review, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 375–411.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther (2011). ‘Constitutionalizing Polycontexturality’, Social & Legal Studies, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 210–229.Google Scholar
Thomasberger, Claus (2015). ‘Europe at a Crossroads: Failed Ideas, Fictional Facts, and Fatal Consequences’, Forum for Social Economics, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 179–200.Google Scholar
Thornhill, Chris (2011). A Sociology of Constitutions: Constitutions and State Legitimacy in Historical-Sociological Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tuori, Kaarlo (2010). ‘The Many Constitutions of Europe’, in Tuori, Kaarlo and Sankari, Suvi (eds), The Many Constitutions of Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 3–30.Google Scholar
Tuori, Kaarlo (2015). European Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Tuori, Kaarlo and Tuori, Klaus (2014). The Eurozone Crisis: A Constitutional Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, Neil (2002). ‘The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism’, Modern Law Review, Vol. 65, No. 3, pp. 317–359.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1978) [orig. 1922]. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, edited by Roth, Guenther and Wittich, Claus. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1981) [orig. 1913]. ‘Some Categories of Interpretive Sociology’, Sociological Inquiry, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 151–180.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (2004) [orig. 1904]. ‘The “Objectivity” of Knowledge in Social Science and Social Policy’, in Whimster, Sam (ed.), Essential Weber: A Reader. London: Routledge, pp. 359–404.Google Scholar
Wilsher, Daniel (2014). ‘Law and the Financial Crisis: Searching for Europe’s New Gold Standard’, European Law Journal, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 241–283.Google Scholar
Zafirovski, Milan (2001). ‘Sociology of Economics or Sociology of Economy? Theoretical-Methodological Arguments for Sociological Economics’, Forum for Social Economics, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 27–58.Google Scholar