Anghie, A., Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Barrett, P., ‘Amazon Crusader. Chevron Pest. Fraud?’, Bloomberg Business Week, (9 March 2011). Available at www.bloomberg.com/bw/magazine/content/11_12/b4220056636512.htm.Google Scholar

Benjamin, W., ‘Critique of Violence’ in Benjamin, W., Reflections, Essays, Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writings (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1978), pp. 277–300.Google Scholar

Caron, D., and Caplan, L. M., The UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules. A Commentary, 2nd edn. (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Cormack, B., A Power to Do Justice. Jurisdiction, English Literature, and the Rise of Common Law (The University of Chicago Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Costa, S., and Gonçalves, G., ‘Human Rights as Collective Entitlement? – Afro-Descendants in Latin America and the Caribbean’, Zeitschrift für Menschenrechte, 5 (2011), pp. 52–71.Google Scholar

Davidov, V., ‘Aguinda v. Texaco Inc.: Expanding Indigenous “Expertise” Beyond Ecoprimitivism’, Journal of Legal Anthropology, 1 (2010), pp. 147–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davitti, D., ‘On the Meanings of International Investment Law and International Human Rights Law: The Alternative Narrative of Due Diligence’, Human Rights Law Review, 12 (2012), pp. 421–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Derrida, J., Rogues: Two Essays on Reason (Stanford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Dhooge, L. J., ‘Aguinda v. ChevronTexaco: Discretionary Grounds for the Non-Recognition of Foreign Judgments for Environmental Injury in the United States’, Virginia Environmental Law Journal, 28 (2010), pp. 241–98.Google Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, A., Rechtskraft (Berlin: August Verlag, 2013).Google Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, A., ‘Systemtheorie als kritische Gesellschaftstheorie’ in Fischer-Lescano, A. and Amstutz, M. (eds.), Kritische Systemtheorie (Bielefeld: Transcript, 2013), pp. 13–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, A., and Teubner, G., Regime-Kollisionen (Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2006).Google Scholar

Fraser, N., Justice Interruptus. Critical Reflections on the ‘Postsocialist’ Condition (New York: Routledge, 1997).Google Scholar

Gill, S., ‘Constitutionalizing Inequality and the Clash of Globalizations’, International Studies Review, 4 (2002), pp. 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hernández, B., ‘Cowode. La imagen waorani del caníbal y la lucha por el territorio en el Yasuní’ in Pineda, J. and Krainer, A. (eds.), Periferias de la Periferia. Procesos Territoriales Indígenas en la Costa y la Amazonía Ecuatoriana (Quito: FLACSO, 2012), pp. 165–92.Google Scholar

Horst, J., ‘Politiken der Entparadoxierung. Versuch einer Bestimmung des Politischen in der funktional ausdifferenzierten Weltgesellschaft’ in Fischer-Lescano, A. and Amstutz, M. (eds.), Kritische Systemtheorie (Bielefeld: transcript, 2013), pp. 189–212.Google Scholar

Kennedy, D., ‘The International Human Rights Movement: Part of the Problem?’, European Human Rights Law Review, 3 (2001), pp. 245–67.Google Scholar

Korovkin, T., ‘Between Class and Ethnicity: Encounters of Ecuador’s Indigenous People with the Political Left’, Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies, 5 (2010), pp. 331–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krommendijk, J., and Morijn, J., ‘“Proportional” by What Measure(s)? Balancing Investor Interests and Human Rights by Way of Applying the Proportionality Principle in Investor-State Arbitration’ in Dupuy, P. M., Petersmann, H. U. and Francioni, F. (eds.), Human Rights in International Investment Law and Arbitration (Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 422–50.Google Scholar

Lembke, M., In the Lands of Oligarchs: Ethno-Politics and the Struggle for Social Justice in the Indigenous-Peasant Movements of Guatemala and Ecuador (Stockholm University, 2006).Google Scholar

Marks, S., ‘Human Rights and Root Causes’, The Modern Law Review, 74 (2011), pp. 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matthews, D., ‘From Jurisdiction to Juriswriting: At the Expressive Limits of the Law’, Law, Culture and the Humanities, published online before print (20 March 2014), 1–21.Google Scholar

Menke, C., ‘Law and Violence’, Law and Literature, 22 (2010), pp. 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Menke, C., Recht und Gewalt (August Verlag, Berlin, 2011).Google Scholar

Miles, K., ‘International Investment Law: Origins, Imperialism and Conceptualizing the Environment’, Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law & Policy, 21 (2010), pp. 1–47.Google Scholar

Möller, K., ‘Global Assemblages im neuen Konstitutionalismus. Rechtstheoretische Probleme der neo-gramscianischen internationalen politischen Ökonomie (IPÖ)’, Ancilla Iuris, (2008), pp. 44–56.Google Scholar

Nelken, D., ‘Beyond the Metaphor of Legal Transplants? Consequences of Autopoeietic Theory for the Study of Cross-cultural Legal Adaption’ in Priban, J. and Nelken, D. (eds.), Law’s New Boundaries: The Consequences of Legal Autopoiesis (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001), pp. 265–302.Google Scholar

Noronha, C., ‘Ecuadorian Chevron Oil Pollution Case Goes before Canadian High Court’, Canadian Business, (11 December 2014). Available at www.canadianbusiness.com/business-news/ecuadorian-chevron-oil-pollution-case-goes-before-canadian-high-court/.Google Scholar

Pahuja, S., Decolonising International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pahuja, S., ‘Laws of Encounter: A Jurisdictional Account of International Law’, London Review of International Law, 1 (2013), pp. 63–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petersmann, E. U., ‘International Rule of Law and Constitutional Justice in International investment Law and Arbitration’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 16 (2009), pp. 513–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pineda, J., and Krainer, A. (eds.), Periferias de la periferia. Procesos territoriales indígenas en la Costa y la Amazonia ecuatorianas (Quito: FLACSO, 2012).Google Scholar

Rivas Toledo, A., and Lara Ponce, R., Conservación y Petróleo en la Amazonia Ecuatoriana. Un acercamiento al caso huaorani (Quito: EcoCiencia, 2001).Google Scholar

Reiner, C., and Schreuer, C., ‘Human Rights and International Investment Arbitration’ in Dupuy, P. M., Petersmann, H. U. and Francioni, F. (eds.), Human Rights in International Investment Law and Arbitration (Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 82–96.Google Scholar

Rush, P., ‘An Altered Jurisdiction: Corporeal Traces of Law’, Griffith Law Review, 6 (1998), pp. 144–65.Google Scholar

de Sousa Santos, B., Toward a New Legal Common Sense. Law, Globalization and Emancipation (London: Butterworths LexisNexis, 2002).Google Scholar

Schneiderman, D., ‘Investment Rules and the New Constitutionalism’, Law & Social Inquiry, 25 (2000), pp. 757–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneiderman, D., Constitutionalizing Economic Globalization (Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Simma, B., ‘Foreign Investment Arbitration: A Place for Human Rights’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 60 (2011), pp. 573–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simma, B., and Kill, T., ‘Harmonizing Investment Protection and International Human Rights: First Steps Towards a Methodology’ in Binder, C., Kriebaum, U., Reinisch, A. and Wittich, S. (eds.), International Investment Law for the 21st Century. Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer (Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 677–707.Google Scholar

Spivak, G. C., ‘Can the Subaltern Speak?’ in Nelson, C. and Grossberg, L. (eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1988), pp. 271–313.Google Scholar

Spivak, G. C., ‘Righting Wrongs’, The South Atlantic Quarterly, 103 (2004), pp. 523–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teubner, G., and Fischer-Lescano, A., ‘Cannibalizing Epistemes: Will Modern Law Protect Traditional Cultural Expression?’ in Graber, C. B. and Burri-Nenova, M. (eds.), Intellectual Property and Traditional Cultural Expression in a Digital Environment (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2008), pp. 17–45.Google Scholar

Teubner, G., and Korth, P., ‘Zwei Arten des Rechtspluralismus: Normkollisionen in der doppelten Fragmentierung der Weltgesellschaft’ in Kötter, M. and Schuppert, G. F. (eds.), Normative Pluralität ordnen (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2009), pp. 137–68.Google Scholar

Torpey, J., ‘An Avalanche of History: The “Collapse of the Future” and the Rise of Reparations Politics’ in Berg, M. and Schäfer, B. (eds.), Historical Justice in International Perspective. How Societies are Trying to Right the Wrongs of the Past (German Historical Institute, Washington D.C. and Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 21–38.Google Scholar

Vogt, J., ‘Urteil Ecuador vs. Chevron: Ein Urteil, vielleicht mit Folgen’, taz. Die Tageszeitung, (4 January 2012). Available at www.taz.de/!84957/.Google Scholar