Book contents
- Time-Lapse Microscopy in In-Vitro Fertilization
- Time-Lapse Microscopy in In-Vitro Fertilization
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Chapter 1 Introduction: IVF concepts, embryo development, and embryo selection
- Chapter 2 Description of time-lapse systems: EmbryoScope™
- Chapter 3 Description of time-lapse systems: Primo Vision™
- Chapter 4 Description of time-lapse systems: the EevaTMTest
- Chapter 5 Morphological cytoplasmic oocyte alterations: embryo kinetics of dysmorphic oocytes
- Chapter 6 Evaluating embryo development stages using time-lapse microscopy (TLM)
- Chapter 7 Embryo quality (classification and selection)
- Chapter 8 Time-lapse implementation in a clinical setting: management of laboratory quality
- Chapter 9 Time-lapse implementation in a clinical setting: outcome results
- Chapter 10 Unusual phenomena in embryonic development
- Index
- References
Chapter 6 - Evaluating embryo development stages using time-lapse microscopy (TLM)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 April 2016
Edited by
Book contents
- Time-Lapse Microscopy in In-Vitro Fertilization
- Time-Lapse Microscopy in In-Vitro Fertilization
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Chapter 1 Introduction: IVF concepts, embryo development, and embryo selection
- Chapter 2 Description of time-lapse systems: EmbryoScope™
- Chapter 3 Description of time-lapse systems: Primo Vision™
- Chapter 4 Description of time-lapse systems: the EevaTMTest
- Chapter 5 Morphological cytoplasmic oocyte alterations: embryo kinetics of dysmorphic oocytes
- Chapter 6 Evaluating embryo development stages using time-lapse microscopy (TLM)
- Chapter 7 Embryo quality (classification and selection)
- Chapter 8 Time-lapse implementation in a clinical setting: management of laboratory quality
- Chapter 9 Time-lapse implementation in a clinical setting: outcome results
- Chapter 10 Unusual phenomena in embryonic development
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Time-Lapse Microscopy in In-Vitro Fertilization , pp. 90 - 103Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Edwards, RG, Fishel, SB, Fehilly, CB, Purdy, JM, Slater, JM, Cohen, J, et al. Factors influencing the success of in-vitro fertilization for alleviating human infertility. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1984;1:3–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berger, DS, Abdelhafez, F, Russell, H, Goldfarb, J, Desai, N. Severe teratozoospermia and its influence on pronuclear morphology, embryonic cleavage and compaction. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2011;22;9:37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giorgetti, C, Hans, E, Terriou, P, Salzmann, J, Barry, B, Chabert-Orsini, V, et al. Early cleavage: an additional predictor of high implantation rate following elective single embryo transfer. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14:85–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hesters, L, Prisant, N, Fanchin, R, Méndez Lozano, DH, Feyereisen, E, Frydman, R, et al. Impact of early cleaved zygote morphology on embryo development and in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer outcome: a prospective study. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:1677–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lian, WL, Xin, ZM, Jin, HX, Song, WY, Peng, ZF, Sun, YP. Effects of early-cleavage embryo transfer on in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer pregnancy outcomes. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2013;40:319–22.Google ScholarPubMed
Machtinger, R, Racowsky, C. Morphological systems of human embryo assessment and clinical evidence. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;26:210–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terriou, P, Giorgetti, C, Hans, E, Salzmann, J, Charles, O, Cignetti, L, et al. Relationship between even early cleavage and day 2 embryo score and assessment of their predictive value for pregnancy. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14:294–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology. The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1270–83.Google Scholar
Herrero, J and Meseguer, M. Selection of high potential embryos using time-lapse imaging: the era of morphokinetics. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:1030–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkegaard, K, Agerholm, IE, Ingerslev, HJ. Time-lapse monitoring as a tool for clinical embryo assessment. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:1277–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holte, J, Berglund, L, Milton, K, Garello, C, Gennarelli, G, Revelli, A, Bergh, T. Construction of an evidence-based integrated morphology cleavage embryo score for implantation potential of embryos scored and transferred on day 2 after oocyte retrieval. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:548–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prados, FJ, Debrock, S, Lemmen, JG, Agerholm, I. The cleavage stage embryo. Hum Reprod. 2012;27 Suppl 1:i50–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Racowsky, C, Vernon, M, Mayer, J, Ball, GD, Behr, B, Pomeroy, KO, et al. Standardization of grading embryo morphology. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:1152–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guerif, F, Frapsauce, C, Chavez, C, Cadoret, V, Royere, D. Treating women under 36 years old without top-quality embryos on day 2: a prospective study comparing double embryo transfer with single blastocyst transfer. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:775–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Royen, E, Mangelschots, K, Vercruyssen, M, De Neubourg, D, Valkenburg, M, Ryckaert, G, et al. Multinucleation in cleavage stage embryos. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1062–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Ambroggio, J, Gindoff, PR, Dayal, MB, Khaldi, R, Peak, D, Frankfurter, D, et al. Multinucleation of a sibling blastomere on day 2 suggests unsuitability for embryo transfer in IVF-preimplantation genetic screening cycles. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:856–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickering, SJ, Taylor, A, Johnson, MH, Braude, PR. An analysis of multinucleated blastomere formation in human embryos. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:1912–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veek, LL. Preembryo grading and degree of cytoplasmic fragmentation. In: An Atlas of Human Gametes and Conceptuses: An Illustrated Reference for Assisted Reproductive Technology. New York, USA: Parthenon Publishing, 1999: pp. 46–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebner, T, Moser, M, Sommergruber, M, Gaiswinkler, U, Shebl, O, Jesacher, K, et al. Occurrence and developmental consequences of vacuoles throughout preimplantation development. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:1635–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gabrielsen, A, Lindenberg, S, Petersen, K. The impact of the zona pellucida thickness variation of human embryos on pregnancy outcome in relation to suboptimal embryo development. A prospective randomized controlled study. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:2166–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, YP, Xu, Y, Cao, T, Su, YC, Guo, YH. Zona pellucida thickness and clinical pregnancy outcome following in vitro fertilization. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005;89:258–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le Cruguel, S, Ferré-L’Hôtellier, V, Morinière, C, Lemerle, S, Reynier, P, Descamps, P, et al. Early compaction at day 3 may be a useful additional criterion for embryo transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30:683–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skiadas, CC, Jackson, KV, Racowsky, C. Early compaction on day 3 may be associated with increased implantation potential. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:1386–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomari, H, Honjou, K, Nagata, Y, Horiuchi, T. Relationship between meiotic spindle characteristics in human oocytes and the timing of the first zygotic cleavage after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28:1099–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed