Abel, M. (1990). Experiences in an exploratory distributed organization. In Galegher, J., Kraut, R. E., & Egido, C. (eds.), Intellectual teamwork. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Adhikari, R. (1998, May 4). Groupware to the next level. InformationWeek, 106–111.Google Scholar

Allen, T. J. (1977). Managing the flow of technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bainbridge, W. S. (2007). The scientific research potential of virtual worlds. Science, 317 (5837), 472–476.Google Scholar

Bainbridge, W. S. (ed.). (2009). Online worlds: Convergence of the real and the virtual. London: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Baker, W. E. (1992). The network organization in theory and practice. In Nohria, N. & Eccles, R. G. (eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action (pp. 397–429). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar

Bandow, D. (1997). Geographically distributed work groups and IT: A case study of working relationships and IS professionals. In SIGCPR ’97 Proceedings of the 1997 ACM SIGCPR Conference on Computer Personnel Research (pp. 87–92). San Francisco: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnatt, C. (1995). Office space, cyberspace and virtual organization. Journal of General Management, 20 (4), 78–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beck, J. C., & Wade, M. (2004). Got game: How the gamer generation is reshaping business forever. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar

Bélanger, F., & Watson-Manheim, M. (2006). Virtual teams and multiple media: Structuring media use to attain strategic goals. Group Decision & Negotiation, 15 (4), 299–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2002). A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Group & Organization Management, 27 (1), 14.Google Scholar

Bell, M. (2008). Toward a definition of “Virtual Worlds.” Journal of Virtual World Research, 1 (1), 1–5.Google Scholar

Benjamin, R., & Wigand, R. T. (1995). Electronic markets and virtual value chains on the Information Superhighway. Sloan Management Review, 2, 62–72.Google Scholar

Bly, S. A., Harrison, S. R., & Irwin, S. (1993). Media spaces: Bringing people together in a video, audio, and computing environment. Communications of the ACM, 36(1), 28–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boellstorff, T. (2008). Coming of age in Second Life: An anthropologist explores the virtually human. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bughin, J. (2008). The rise of enterprise 2.0. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice, 9 (3), 251–259.Google Scholar

Castronova, E., & Falk, M. (2008). Virtual worlds as Petri dishes for the social and behavioral sciences (December 2008). RatSWD Working Paper No. 47. Retrieved from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1445340 (accessed November 7, 2017).Google Scholar

Chesbrough, H. W., & Teece, D. J. (1996). Organizing for innovation. Harvard Business Review, January–February, 65–73.Google Scholar

Churchill, E. F., & Bly, S. (1999). Virtual environments at work: Ongoing use of MUDs in the workplace. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Work Activities Coordination and Collaboration, San Francisco, CA (pp. 99–108). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), WACC ’99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Churchill, E. F., & Snowdon, D. (1998). Collaborative virtual environments: An introductory review of issues and systems. Virtual Reality: Research, Development and Applications, 3(1), 3–15.Google Scholar

Coleman, D. (1996). Electronic collaboration on the Internet and Intranets. San Francisco: Collaborative Strategies. Retrieved from: www.collaborate.com/intranet.html (accessed January 5, 2017).Google Scholar

Curtis, P. (1995). Mudding: Social phenomenon in text-based virtual realities. In Stefik, M. (ed.), Internet dreams: Archetypes, myths, and metaphors (pp. 265–292). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Davenport, T. H., Eccles, R. G., & Prusak, L. (1992). Information politics. Sloan Management Review, Fall 1992, 53–65.Google Scholar

Davidow, W. (1992). Virtual corporation. Forbes, December 7, 102–107.Google Scholar

Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169–193.Google Scholar

DeSanctis, G., & Gallupe, R. B. (1987). A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Science, 33(5), 589–609.Google Scholar

DeSanctis, G., Poole, M. S., Desharnais, G., & Lewis, H. (1991). Using computing to facilitate the quality improvement process: The IRS-Minnesota project. Interfaces, 21(6), 23–36.Google Scholar

DeSanctis, G., Poole, M. S., Dickson, G. W., & Jackson, B. M. (1993). Interpretive analysis of team use of group technologies. Journal of Organizational Computing, 3(1), 1–30.Google Scholar

DiMartino, V., & Wirth, L. (1990). Telework: A new way of working and living. International Labour Review, 129(5), 529–554.Google Scholar

Drescher, M. A., Korsgaard, M. A., Wigand, R. T., Welpe, I. S., & Picot, A. (2014). The dynamics of shared leadership: Building trust and enhancing performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(5), 771–783. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0036474 (accessed November 7, 2017).Google Scholar

Dyson, E. (1990). Why groupware is gaining ground. Datamation, March 1, 52–56.Google Scholar

Englberger, H. (2000). Kommunikation von Innovationsbarrieren in telekooperativen Reorganisationsprozessen. Wiesbaden: Gabler.engleberger.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finn, K. E., Sellen, A. J., & Wilbur, S. B. (eds.). (1997). Video mediated communication: Computer, cognition and work series. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Fowler, G. D., & Wackerbarth, M. E. (1980). Audio teleconferencing versus face-to-face conferencing: A synthesis of the literature. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 44 (Summer), 236–252.Google Scholar

Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Grantham, C. E. (1996). Working in a virtual place: A case study of distributed work. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPR/SIGMIS Special Interest Group Conference on Computer Personnel Research, San Francisco, CA (pp. 68–84). New York: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM).Google Scholar

Grohowski, R., McGoff, C., Vogel, D., Martz, B., & Nunamaker, J. (1990). Implementing electronic meeting systems at IBM: Lessons learned and success factors. MIS Quarterly, 14(4), 369–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Handy, C. (1995). Trust and virtual organization: How do you manage people whom you do not see. Harvard Business Review, 73(3), 40–50.Google Scholar

Harasim, L. (1993). Global networks: Computers and international communications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hart, P. (1999). Understanding colocation requirements and refining expectations about computer network use: A field study of engineering design environments. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS ’99, Charlotte, NC (pp. 484–488). Atlanta, GA: Association for Information Systems.Google Scholar

Heninger, W. G., Dennis, A. R., & Hilmer, K. M. (2006). Individual cognition and dual-task interference in group support systems. Information Systems Research, 17(4), 415–424.Google Scholar

Hertel, G., Konradt, U., & Orlikowski, B. (2004). Managing distance by interdependence: Goal setting, task interdependence, and team-based rewards in virtual teams. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 13 (1), 1–28.Google Scholar

Hiltz, S. R., & Turoff, M. (1992). Virtual meetings: Computer conferencing and distributed group support. In Bostrom, R. P., Waston, R. T., & Kinney, S. (eds.), Computer augmented teamwork (pp. 67–85). New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar

Hoffman, D. L., Novak, T. P., & Peralta, M. (1999). Building consumer trust on-line. Communications of the ACM, 42(4), 80–85.Google Scholar

Hossain, L., & Wigand, R. T. (2003). Understanding virtual collaboration through structuration. In Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Knowledge Management (pp. 475–484).Google Scholar

Hossain, L., & Wigand, R. T. (2004). Trust for e-business management. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Electronic Business: Shaping Business Strategy in a Networked World, December 5–9, 2004 (pp. 893–900). Beijing, China: Tsinghua University, International Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Huh, S., & Williams, D. (2009). Dude looks like a lady: Online game gender swapping. In Bainbridge, W. S. (ed.), Online worlds: Convergence of the real and the virtual (pp. 161–174). Guildford: Springer.Google Scholar

Igbaria, M., Shayo, C., & Olfman, L. (1999). On becoming virtual: The driving forces and arrangements. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPR Special Interest Group Conference on Computer Personnel Research, New Orleans, LA (pp. 27–41). New York: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM).Google Scholar

Jarvenpaa, S., & Ives, B. (1994). The global network organization of the future: Information management opportunities and challenges. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10(4), 25–57.Google Scholar

Jarvenpaa, S. L., Knoll, K., & Leidner, D. E. (1998). Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(4), 29–64.Google Scholar

Jarvenpaa, S. L., Shaw, T. R., & Staples, D. S. (2004). Toward contextualized theories of trust: The role of trust in global virtual teams. Information Systems Research, 15 (3), 250–264.Google Scholar

Jirotka, M., Gilbert, N., & Luff, P. (1992). On the social organization of organizations. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1(1), 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, S., Wilikens, M., Morris, P., & Masera, M. (2000). Trust requirements in e-business. Communications of the ACM, 43(12), 81–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joshi, A., Lazarova, M. B., & Liao, H. (2009). Getting everyone on board: The role of inspirational leadership in geographically dispersed teams. Organization Science, 20(1), 240–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jude-York, D. (1998). Technology enhanced teamwork: Aligning individual contributions for superior team performance. Organization Development Journal, 16(3), 73–80.Google Scholar

Kanawattanachai, P., & Yoo, Y. (2007). The impact of knowledge coordination on virtual team performance over time. MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 783–808.Google Scholar

Kasper-Fuehrer, E. C., Ashkanasy, N. M., & Neal, M. (2001). Communicating trustworthiness and building trust in interorganizational virtual organizations. Journal of Management, 27(3), 235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendall, L. (2002). Hanging out in the virtual pub: Masculinities and relationships online. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kiely, T. (1993). Learning to share. CIO, July, 38–44.Google Scholar

Kirkman, B. L., & Mathieu, J. E. (2005). The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality. Journal of Management, 31(5), 700–718.Google Scholar

Kock, N. (2000). Benefits for virtual organizations from distributed groups. Communications of the ACM, 43(11), 107–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korsgaard, M. A., Picot, A., Wigand, R. T., Welpe, I. A., & Assmann, J. (2009). Cooperation, coordination and trust in virtual teams: Insights from virtual games (with). In Bainbridge, William Sims (ed.), Online worlds: Convergence of the real and the virtual (pp. 251–262). London: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Kramer, R. M., & Tyler, T. R. (eds.) (1996). Trust in organizations: Frontiers of strategy and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar

Kraut, R., Egido, C., & Galegher, J. (1988). Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaboration. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW ’88, Portland, OR (pp. 1–12). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.Google Scholar

Lucas, H. C, & Olson, M. (1994). The impact of information technology on organizational flexibility. Journal of Organizational Computing, 4 (2), 155–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ludwig, G. S. (1999). Virtual geographic research teams: A case study. Journal of Geography, 98(3), 149–154.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. (1986). Persöniches Vertrauen. In Vertrauen: Ein Mechanismus der Reduktion sozialer Komplexität, 3rd ed. (pp. 165–185). Stuttgart: Enke Verlag.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. (1989). Ecological communication. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press and Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. (2000). The reality of the mass media. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press and Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. (1994). Die Wirtschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar

Majchrzak, A., Malhotra, A., & John, R. (2005). Perceived individual collaboration know-how development through information technology-enabled contextualization: Evidence from distributed teams. Information Systems Research, 16, 1, 9–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Majchrzak, A., Rice, R. E., Malhotra, A., King, N., & Ba, S. (2000). Technology adaptation: The case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 569–600.Google Scholar

Malhotra, Y., Galletta, D. F., & Kirsch, L. J. (2008). How endogenous motivations influence user intentions: Beyond the dichotomy of extrinsic and intrinsic user motivations. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(1), 267–299.Google Scholar

Malone, T. W., & Rockart, J. F. (1993). How will information technology reshape organizations? Computers as coordination technology. In Bradley, S. P., Hausman, J. A., & Nolan, R. L. (eds.), Globalization, technology, and competition: The fusion of computer and telecommunications in the 1990s (pp. 37–55). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar

Martins, L. L., Gilson, L. L., & Maynard, M. T. (2004). Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 805–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McLeod, P. L. (1992). An assessment of the experimental literature on electronic support of group work: Results of a meta-analysis. Human-Computer Interaction, 7, 257–280.Google Scholar

Nakamura, L. (2009). Digitizing race: Visual cultures of the internet. Visual Studies, 24(1), 90–91.Google Scholar

Nayak, N., Bhaskaran, K., & Das, R. (2001). Virtual enterprises: Building blocks for dynamic e-business. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Information Technology for Virtual Enterprises, Goldcoast, Queensland, Australia (pp. 80–87). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar

Niederman, F., & Beise, C. M. (1999). Defining the “virtualness” of groups, teams, and meetings. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPR Conference on Computer Personnel Research, New Orleans, LA (pp. 14–18). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM).Google Scholar

Ono, C., Paulson, B. C., Kanetomo, D., Cutkosky, M., Kim, K., & Petrie, C. J. (2001). Trust-based facilitator for e-partnerships. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Autonomous Agents, Montréal, Canada (pp. 108–109). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM).Google Scholar

Overby, E. (2008). Process virtualization theory and the impact of information technology. Organization Science, 19(2), 277–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palmer, J. W. (1996). Supporting the virtual organization through information technology in a new venture: The RETEX experience. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPR/SIGMIS Special Interest Group Annual Conference on Computer Personnel Research, Denver, CO (pp. 223–233). New York, NY: Association for Computing Systems (ACM).Google Scholar

Papows, J. (1998). The rapid evolution of collaborative tools: A paradigm shift. Telecommunications, 32(1), 31–32.Google Scholar

Paré, G., & Dubé, L. (1999). Virtual teams: An exploratory study of key challenges and strategies. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Information Systems, Charlotte, NC (pp. 479–483). Atlanta, GA: Association for Information Systems.Google Scholar

Peterson, R. A. (2001). On the use of college students in social science research: Insights from a second-order meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), 450–461.Google Scholar

Piccoli, G., & Ives, B. (2000). Virtual teams: Managerial behavior control's impact on team effectiveness. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Information Systems, Brisbane, Australia (pp. 575–580). Atlanta, GA: Association for Information Systems.Google Scholar

Piccoli, G., & Ives, B. (2003). Trust and the unintended effects of behavior control in virtual teams. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 365–395.Google Scholar

Picot, A., Assmann, J. J., Korsgaard, M. A., Welpe, I. M., Gallenkamp, J. V., & Wigand, R. T. (2009). A multi-level view of the antecedents and consequences of trust in virtual leaders. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, San Francisco, CA (pp. 11–21). Atlanta, GA: Association of Information Systems.Google Scholar

Picot, A., Reichwald, R., & Wigand, R. (2008). Information, organization and management. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Raghuram, S., Gamd, R., Wiesenfeld, B., & Gupta, V. (2001). Factors contributing to virtual work adjustment. Journal of Management, 27(3), 383–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ratnasingham, P., & Kumar, K. (2000). Trading partner trust in electronic commerce participation. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Information Systems, Brisbane, Australia (pp. 544–552). Atlanta, GA: Association for Information Systems.Google Scholar

Reeves, B., Malone, T. W., & O'Driscoll, T. (2008). Leadership's online labs. Harvard Business Review, 86(5), 59–66.Google Scholar

Reips, U.-D. (2000). The Web experiment method: Advantages, disadvantages, and solutions. In Birnbaum, M. H. (ed.), Psychological experiments on the Internet (pp. 89–117). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Ripperger, T. (1998). Oekonomik des Verrauens. Analyse eines Organisationsprinzips. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar

Rittenbruch, M., Kahler, H., & Cremers, A. B. (1998). Supporting cooperation in a virtual organization. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, Helsinki, Finland (pp. 30–38). Atlanta, GA: Association for Information Systems.Google Scholar

Sarker, S., & Sahay, S. (2003). Understanding virtual team development: An interpretive study. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 4, 1–36.Google Scholar

Schmidt, J. B., Montoya-Weiss, M. M., & Massey, A. P. (2001). New product development decision-making effectiveness: Comparing individuals, face-to-face teams, and virtual teams. Decision Sciences, 32(4), 575–600.Google Scholar

Shekbar, S. (2016). Managing the reality of virtual organizations. Chennai, TN, India: Springer India.Google Scholar

Sheridan, J. H. (1996). The agile web: A model for the future? Industry Week, March 4, pp. 31–35.Google Scholar

Speier, Cheri, & Palmer, Jonathan. (1998). A definition of virtualness. AMCIS 1998 Proceedings (p. 191). Retrieved from: http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis1998/191 (accessed November 7, 2017).Google Scholar

Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Tapscott, D. (1996). The digital economy: Promise and peril in the age of networked intelligence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Townsend, A. M., DeMarie, S. M., & Hendrickson, A. (1998). Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future. The Academy of Management Executive, 12(3), 17–29.Google Scholar

Venkatraman, N., & Henderson, C. (1998). Real strategies for virtual organizing. Sloan Management Review, 40(1), 33–48.Google Scholar

Wakefield, R. L., Leidner, D. E., & Garrison, G. (2008). A model of conflict, leadership, and performance in virtual teams. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 434–455.Google Scholar

Warkentin, M. E., Sayeed, L., & Hightower, R. (1997). Virtual teams versus face-to-face teams: An exploratory study of a web-based conference systems. Decision Sciences, 28(4), 975–996.Google Scholar

Watson-Manheim, M. B., & Bélanger, F. (2007). Communication media repertoires: Dealing with the multiplicity of media choices. MIS Quarterly, 31( 2), 267–293.Google Scholar

Webb, E. J., Campbell, D. T., Schwartz, R. D., & Sechrest, L. (1966). Unobtrusive measures: Nonreactive research in the social sciences (p. 237). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Webster, J., & Wong, W. K. P. (2008). Comparing traditional and virtual group forms: Identity, communication and trust in naturally occurring project teams. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(1), 41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whittaker, S. (1996). Talking to strangers: An evaluation of the factors affecting electronic collaboration. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW ’96), Boston, MA (pp. 409–418). New York: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM).Google Scholar

Wigand, R. T. (1997) Electronic commerce: Definition, theory and context. The Information Society, 13, 1–16.Google Scholar

Wigand, R. T., & Imamura, T. (1997). Virtual organization: Enablers and boundaries of an emerging organizational form. In Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Indianapolis, IN (pp. 423–425). Atlanta, GA: Association for Information Systems.Google Scholar

Wigand, R. T., Picot, A., & Reichwald, R. (1997). Information, organization and management: Expanding markets and corporate boundaries. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Williams, D., Ducheneaut, N., Xiong, L., Zhang, Y., Yee, N., & Nickell, E. (2006). From tree house to barracks: The social life of guilds in World of Warcraft. Games and Culture, 1(4), 338–361.Google Scholar

Williams, D., Yee, N., & Caplan, S. E. (2008). Who plays, how much, and why? Debunking the stereotypical gamer profile. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(4), 993–1018.Google Scholar

Wise, T. P. (2016). Trust in virtual teams. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Yee, N. (2006). The labor of fun: How video games blur the boundaries of work and play. Games and Culture, 1(1), 68–71.Google Scholar

Zhang, D., Lowry, P. B., Zhou, L., & Fu, X. (2007). The impact of individualism: Collectivism, social presence, and group diversity on group decision making under majority influence. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(4), 53–80.Google Scholar