Book contents
- Geophysics and Geosequestration
- Geophysics and Geosequestration
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Geophysical Techniques
- Chapter 4 Rock Physics of CO2 Storage Monitoring in Porous Media
- Chapter 5 Multicomponent Seismic Monitoring
- Chapter 6 Monitoring the Deformation Associated with the Geological Storage of CO2
- Chapter 7 Gravity
- Chapter 8 Estimating Saturation and Density Changes Caused by CO2 Injection at Sleipner
- Chapter 9 Electrical and Electromagnetic Methods
- Chapter 10 Microseismic Imaging of CO2 Injection
- Chapter 11 Well Logging
- Part III Case Studies
- Part IV Summary
- Index
- References
Chapter 8 - Estimating Saturation and Density Changes Caused by CO2 Injection at Sleipner
from Part II - Geophysical Techniques
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 April 2019
Book contents
- Geophysics and Geosequestration
- Geophysics and Geosequestration
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Geophysical Techniques
- Chapter 4 Rock Physics of CO2 Storage Monitoring in Porous Media
- Chapter 5 Multicomponent Seismic Monitoring
- Chapter 6 Monitoring the Deformation Associated with the Geological Storage of CO2
- Chapter 7 Gravity
- Chapter 8 Estimating Saturation and Density Changes Caused by CO2 Injection at Sleipner
- Chapter 9 Electrical and Electromagnetic Methods
- Chapter 10 Microseismic Imaging of CO2 Injection
- Chapter 11 Well Logging
- Part III Case Studies
- Part IV Summary
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Geophysics and Geosequestration , pp. 134 - 153Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Alnes, H., Eiken, O., Nooner, S., Sasagawa, G., Stenvold, T., and Zumberge, M. (2011). Results from Sleipner gravity monitoring: Updated density and temperature distribution of the CO2 plume. Energy Procedia, 4: 5504–5551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arts, R., Chadwick, A., Eiken, O., Thibeau, S., and Nooner, S. (2008). Ten years’ experience of monitoring CO2 injection in the Utsira sand at Sleipner, offshore Norway. First Break, 26: 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backus, G. E. (1962). Long-wave elastic anisotropy produced by horizontal layering. Journal of Geophysical Research, 67: 4427–4440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bai, J., and Yingst, D. (2014). Simultaneous inversion of velocity and density in time-domain full waveform inversion. Expanded Abstracts, Society of Exploration Geophysicists Technical Program, 922–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhakta, T., and Landrø, M. (2014). Estimation of pressure-saturation changes for unconsolidated reservoir rocks with high Vp/Vs ratio. Geophysics, 79: M35–M54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boait, F. C., White, N. J., Bickle, M. J., Chadwick, R. A., Neufeld, J. A., and Huppert, H. E. (2012). Spatial and temporal evolution of injected CO2 at the Sleipner Field, North Sea. Journal of Geophysical Research, 117: B03309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buland, A., Landrø, M., Andersen, M., and Dahl, T. (1996). AVO inversion of Troll Field data. Geophysics, 61: 1589–1602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavanagh, A. J., and Haszeldine, R. S. (2014). The Sleipner storage site: Capillary flow modeling of a layered CO2 plume requires fractured shale barriers within the Utsira Formation. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 21: 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evensen, A. K., and Landrø, M. (2010). Time-lapse tomographic inversion using a Gaussian parameterization of the velocity changes. Geophysics, 75: U29–U38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furre, A. K., and Eiken, O. (2014). Dual sensor streamer technology used in Sleipner CO2 injection monitoring. Geophysical Prospecting, 62: 1075–1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia Leiceaga, G., Silva, J., Artola, F., Marquez, E., and Vanzeler, J. (2010). Enhanced density estimation from prestack inversion of multicomponent seismic data. Leading Edge, 29: 1220–1226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghaderi, A., and Landrø, M. (2009). Estimation of thickness and velocity changes of injected carbon dioxide layers from prestack time-lapse seismic data. Geophysics, 74: O17–O28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grude, S., Landrø, M., and Osdal, B. (2013). Time-lapse pressure saturation discrimination for CO2 storage at the Snøhvit field. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 19: 369–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helgesen, J., and Landrø, M. (1993). Estimation of elastic parameters from AVO effects in the tau-p domain. Geophysical Prospecting, 41: 341–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keary, P., Brooks, M., and Hill, I. (2002). An introduction to geophysical exploration, 3rd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kiær, A. F., Eiken, O., and Landrø, M. (2015). Calendar time interpolation of amplitude maps from 4D seismic data. Geophysical Prospecting, 64: 421–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landrø, M. (1999). Discrimination between pressure and fluid saturation changes from time lapse seismic data. Expanded Abstracts, Society of Exploration Geophysicists Technical Program, 1651–1654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landrø, M. (2001). Discrimination between pressure and fluid saturation changes from time lapse seismic data. Geophysics, 66: 836–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindeberg, E., and Bergmo, P. (2003). The long-term fate of CO2 injected into an aquifer. In Gale, J. and Kaya, Y. (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-6), Kyoto, Japan, October 1–4, 2002. Oxford: Pergamon, 489–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Queißer, M., and Singh, S. C. (2013). Localizing CO2 at Sleipner: Seismic images versus P-wave velocities from waveform inversion. Geophysics, 78: B131–B146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabben, T. E., and Ursin, B. (2011). AVA inversion of the top Utsira Sand reflection at the Sleipner field. Geophysics, 76: C53–C63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, F. J. L., Nguyen, P. H., MacBeth, C., Clark, R. A., and Magnus, I. (2001). Q estimates from North Sea VSPs. Expanded Abstracts, Society of Exploration Geophysicists Technical Program, 440–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, B., Anno, P., and Gurch, M. (2006). Wide‐angle inversion for density: Tests for heavy‐oil reservoir characterization. Expanded Abstracts, Society of Exploration Geophysicists Technical Program, 1660–1664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, B., Anno, P., and Gurch, M. (2008). Imaging oil-sand reservoir heterogeneities using wide-angle prestack seismic inversion. Leading Edge, 27: 1192–1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sasagawa, G., Crawford, W., Eiken, O., Nooner, S., Stenvold, T., and Zumberge, M. (2003). A new seafloor gravimeter. Geophysics, 68: 544–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Span, R., and Wagner, W. (1996). A new equation of state for carbon dioxide covering the fluid region from the triple-point temperature to 1100 K at pressures up to 800 MPa. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, 25: 1509–1596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stovas, A., Landrø, M., and Avseth, P. (2006). AVO attribute inversion for finely layered reservoirs. Geophysics, 71: C25–C36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trani, M., Arts, R., Leeuwenburgh, O., and Brouwer, J. (2011). Estimation of changes in saturation and pressure from 4D seismic AVO and time-shift analysis. Geophysics, 76: C1–C17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tura, A., and Lumley, D. E. (1999). Estimating pressure and saturation changes from time‐lapse AVO data. In 69th Annual International Meeting, The Society of Exploration Geophysicists. Expanded Abstracts, Society of Exploration Geophysicists Technical Program, 1655–1658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zumberge, M., Alnes, H., Eiken, O., Sasagawa, G., and Stenvold, T. (2008). Precision of seafloor gravity and pressure measurements for reservoir monitoring. Geophysics, 73: WA133–WA141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar