Abondolo, Daniel (1998). ‘Introduction’. The Uralic languages. Abondolo, Daniel (ed.), London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Amsterdamska, Olga (1987). Schools of thought: The development of linguistics from Bopp to Saussure. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Anthony, David W. (2007). The horse, the wheel, and language: How bronze-age riders from the Eurasian steppes shaped the modern world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Ba Shin, U (1962). The Lokahteikpan. Rangoon: The Burma Historical Commission.Google Scholar

Bailey, Harold W. (1946). ‘Gāndhārī’. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 11.4: 764–97.Google Scholar

Bauer, Christian (1990). ‘Numismatics, dialectology, and the periodization of Old Mon’. Mon-Khmer Studies 16–17: 155–76.Google Scholar

Baxter, William H. (1977). ‘Old Chinese origins of the Middle Chinese chóngniǔ doublets: a study using multiple character readings’. Ithaca: Cornell University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar

Baxter, William H. (1992). A handbook of Old Chinese phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Baxter, William H. and Sagart, Laurent (1997). ‘Word formation in Old Chinese’. New approaches to Chinese word formation. Packard, Jerome (ed.), Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 35–76.Google Scholar

Baxter, William H. and Sagart, Laurent (2014). Old Chinese: A new reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Beckwith, Christopher I. (2008). ‘Old Chinese loans in Tibetan and the non-uniqueness of “Sino-Tibetan”’. Medieval Tibeto-Burman Languages III. Beckwith, Christopher (ed.), Halle: International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies GmbH: 61–201.Google Scholar

Beckwith, Christopher I. (2009). Empires of the Silk Road: A history of Central Eurasia from the Bronze Age to the present. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Beckwith, Christopher I. and Kiyose, Gisaburo N. (2008). ‘The origin of the Old Japanese twelve animal cycle’. アルタィ語研究 Arutaigo kenkyū/Altaistic Studies 2:1–18.Google Scholar

Beekes, Robert S. P. (1987). ‘On Indo-European “wine”’. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 48: 21–6.Google Scholar

Behr, Wolfgang (1994). ‘“Largo forms” as secondary evidence in the reconstruction of Old Chinese initial consonant clusters’. Paper read at the 27th International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics, Paris, October 1994.Google Scholar

Behr, Wolfgang (2001). ‘Traces of loose prefixation in Old Chinese lento forms’. Second Conference of the European Association of Chinese Linguistics, Roma/La Sapienza, 6–8 September 2001.Google Scholar

Behr, Wolfgang (2005). ‘Language change in premodern China: notes on its perception and impact on the idea of a “constant way”’. Historical Truth, Historical Criticism and Ideology: Chinese Historiography and Historical Culture from a New Comparative Perspective. Schmidt-Glintzerr, Helwig, Mittag, Achim, and Rüsen, Jörn (eds.), Leiden: Brill, 13–51.Google Scholar

Behr, Wolfgang (2008). Reimende Bronzeinschriften und die Entstehung der chinesischen Endreimdichtung. Bochum: projekt verlag.Google Scholar

Bell, Charles A. (1905). Manual of colloquial Tibetan. Calcutta: Baptist Mission Press.Google Scholar

Benedict, Paul K. (1939). ‘Semantic differentiation in Indo-Chinese’. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 4.3–4: 213–29.Google Scholar

Benedict, Paul K. (1972). Sino-Tibetan: A conspectus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bernot, Denise (1965). ‘The vowel systems of Arakanese and Tavoyan’. Lingua 15: 463–74.Google Scholar

Beyer, Stephen (1992). The classical Tibetan language. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Bialek, Joanna (2015). ‘Studies in the lexis and word-formation of Old Tibetan: compounds and compounding’. Munich: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität PhD dissertation.Google Scholar

Bielmeier, Roland (2004). ‘Shafer’s proto-West Bodish hypothesis and the formation of the Tibetan verb paradigms’. Himalayan languages past and present. Saxena, Anju (ed.), Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 395–412.Google Scholar

Bodman, Nicolas C. (1980). ‘Proto-Chinese and Sino-Tibetan: towards establishing the nature of the relationship’. Contributions to historical linguistics: Issues and methods. van Coetsem, Frans and Waugh, Linda (eds.), Leiden: Brill, 34–199.Google Scholar

Boltz, William (2007). ‘“Where have all the prefixes gone?” Iambic prefixes and semanticization in Old Chinese’. Asiatische Studien: Zeitschrift der Schweizerischen Asiengesellschaft/Études asiatiques: Revue de la Société Suisse – Asie 61.3: 755–73.Google Scholar

Bottéro, François (2013). ‘The Qièyùn manuscripts from Dūnhuáng’. Studies in Chinese manuscripts: From the Warring States period to the 20th century. Galambos, Imre (ed.), Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University, 33–48.Google Scholar

Bradley, David (1979). Proto-Loloish. London: Curzon Press.Google Scholar

Bradley, David (1985). ‘The Arakanese dialect of Burmese and Proto-Burmish reconstruction’. Linguistics of the Sino-Tibetan area: The state of the art. Thurgood, Graham, Matisoff, James A., Bradley, David (eds.), with the assistance of Grace Shiang-Jiun Lin and Keith Record, Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, 180–200.Google Scholar

Bradley, David (2012). ‘The characteristics of the Burmic family of Tibeto-Burman’. Language and Linguistics 13.1: 171–92.Google Scholar

Branner, David (2000). ‘The Suí–Táng tradition of Fǎnqiè phonology’. Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaften – History of the Language Sciences – Histoire des sciences du language – An international handbook on the evolution of the study of language from the beginnings to the present. Auroux, Sylvain, Koerner, Konrad, Niederehe, Hans-Josef, and Versteegh, Kees (eds.), Berlin: De Gruyter, 36–46.Google Scholar

Brown, J. Marvin (1965). From ancient Thai to modern dialects. Bangkok: Social Science Association Press of Thailand.Google Scholar

Brugmann, Karl (1876). ‘Nasalis sonans in der indogermanischen Grundsprache’. Studien zur griechischen und lateinischen Grammatik 9.2: 285–338.Google Scholar

Burling, Robbins (1967). Proto-Lolo-Burmese. Bloomington: Indiana University.Google Scholar

Rin chen grub, Bu ston (1971 [c.1322–6]). ‘Bde bar gśegs paḫi bstan paḫi gsal byed čhos kyi ḫbyuṅ gnas gsuṅ rab rin po čheḫi mdzod’. Chandra, Lokesh (ed.), The collected works of Bu-ston: Ed. from the collections of Raghu Vira. New Delhi: New Delhi: International Academy of Indian Culture. Part 24 (Vol. ya), 633–917 (foll. 1a1–143a4).Google Scholar

Button, Christopher (2012). Proto-North Chin. Berkeley: STEDT.Google Scholar

Caboara, Marco (2014). ‘Review of the bamboo texts of Guodian: a study and complete translation. By Scott Cook’. Journal of Chinese Studies 59: 253–74.Google Scholar

Campbell, Lyle (2004). Historical linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Campbell, Lyle and Poser, William J. (2008). Language classification: History and method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Caplow, Nancy (2009). ‘The role of stress in Tibetan tonogenesis: a study in historical comparative acoustics’. University of California, Santa Barbara, PhD dissertation.Google Scholar

Chacon, Thiago Costa and List, Johann-Mattis (2015). ‘Improved computational models of sound change shed light on the history of the Tukanoan languages’. Journal of Language Relationship 13.3. 177–204.Google Scholar

Chang, Betty Shefts (1971). ‘The Tibetan causative phonology’. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 42: 623–765.Google Scholar

Chang, Kun (1973). Review of Benedict (1972). The Journal of Asian Studies 32.2: 335–7.Google Scholar

Chang, Kun (1974). ‘Ancient Chinese phonology and the Ch’ieh-yün’. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 10.2: 61–82.Google Scholar

Chang, Kwang-Chih (1980). Shang civilization. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Chao, Yuen Ren 趙元任 (1941). ‘Distinctions within ancient Chinese’. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 5: 203–33.Google Scholar

Clackson, James (2007). Indo-European linguistics: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Coblin, W. South (1974). ‘An early Tibetan word for “horse”’. Journal of the American Oriental Society 94.1: 124–5.Google Scholar

Coblin, W. South (1976). ‘Notes on Tibetan verbal morphology’. T’oung Pao 52: 45–70.Google Scholar

Coblin, W. South (1979). ‘A new study of the Pai-lang songs’. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 12: 179–216.Google Scholar

Coblin, W. South (1986). A sinologist’s handlist of Sino-Tibetan lexical comparisons. Nettetal: Steyler Verlag.Google Scholar

Coblin, W. South (1990). ‘A reexamination of the second edict of Khri-srong-lde-btsan’. Reflections on Tibetan culture: Essays in memory of Turrell V. Wylie. Epstein, Lawrence and Sherburne, Richard (eds.), Lewiston: E. Mellen Press, 165–85.Google Scholar

Coblin, W. South (2006a). ‘Reflections on the Shouwen fragments’. The Chinese rime tables: Linguistic philosophy and historical-comparative phonology. Branner, David Prager (ed.), Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 99–122.Google Scholar

Coblin, W. South (2006b). ‘Zhāng Línzhī on the Yùnjìng’. The Chinese rime tables: Linguistic philosophy and historical-comparative phonology. Branner, David Prager (ed.), Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 123–49.Google Scholar

Coblin, W. South (2007). A handbook of ’Phags-pa Chinese. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar

Cook, Scott (2012). The bamboo texts of Guodian: A study and complete translation. Ithaca: Cornell University East Asia Program.Google Scholar

Conrady, August (1896). Eine indochinesische Causativ-Denominativ-Bildung und ihr Zusammenhang mit den Tonaccenten. Leipzig: O. Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Dalton, Jacob P. (2015). ‘Power and compassion: negotiating Buddhist kingship in tenth-century Tibet’. The illuminating mirror: Tibetan studies in honour of Per K. Sørensen on the occasion of his 65th birthday. Czaja, Olaf and Hazod, Guntram (eds.), Wiesbaden: Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag, 101–18.Google Scholar

Dalton, Jacob P. and van Schaik, Sam (2006). Tibetan Tantric manuscripts from Dunhuang: A descriptive catalogue of the Stein Collection at the British Library. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

de la Vallée Poussin, Louis (1962). Catalogue of the Tibetan manuscripts from Tun-huang in the India Office Library. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dempsey, Jakob (2001). ‘Remarks on the vowel system of old Burmese’. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 24.2: 205–34. Errata, 26.1: 183.Google Scholar

Dempsey, Jakob (2003). ‘Analysis of rime-groups in Northern-Burmish’. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 26.1: 63–124.Google Scholar

Denwood, Philip (1999). Tibetan. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Tonghe, Dong 董同龢 (1949). ‘上古音韵表稿 shanggu yinyun biaogao’ (Draft table of ancient rhymes). Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 18: 1–249.Google Scholar

Dotson, Brandon (2007). ‘Divination and law in the Tibetan empire: the role of dice in the legislation of loans, interest, martial law and troop conscription’. Contributions to the cultural history of early Tibet. Kapstein, Matthew and Dotson, Brandon (eds.), Leiden: Brill, 3–77.Google Scholar

Dotson, Brandon (2009). The Old Tibetan annals: An annotated translation of Tibet’s first history. Vienna: Verlag der osterreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar

Dotson, Brandon (2013). ‘The princess and the yak: the hunt as narrative trope and historical reality in early Tibet’. Scribes, texts, and rituals in early Tibet and Dunhuang. Dotson, Brandon, Iwao, Kazushi, and Takeuchi, Tsuguhito (eds.), Wiesbaden: Dr Ludwig Reichert Verlag, 61–86.Google Scholar

Dragunov, Aleksandr A. (1931). Review of Simon 1929. Orientalistische Literaturzeitung 26: 1085–90.Google Scholar

van Driem, George (2012). ‘The Trans-Himalayan phylum and its implications for population prehistory’. Communication on Contemporary Anthropology 5: 135–42.Google Scholar

Faber, Alice (1985). ‘Akkadian evidence for proto-Semitic affricates’. Journal of Cuneiform Studies 37.1: 101–7.Google Scholar

Ferlus, Michel (1982). ‘Spirantisation des obstruantes médiales et formation du système consonantique du vietnamien’. Cahiers de linguistique – Asie orientale 11: 83–106.Google Scholar

Fortson, Benjamin W. (2010). Indo-European language and culture: An introduction. 2nd edn. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Frasch, Tilman (1996). Pagan: Stadt und Staat. Stuttgart: F. Steiner.Google Scholar

von der Gabelentz, Georg (1881). Chinesische Grammatik: Mit Ausschluss des niederen Stiles und der heutigen Umgangssprache. Leipzig: T.O. Weigel.Google Scholar

Gage, William (1985). ‘Vietnamese in Mon-Khmer perspective’. Southeast Asian Linguistic Studies Presented to André-G. Haudricourt. Ratanakul, Suriya, Thomas, David D., and Premsrirat, Suwilai (eds.), Bangkok: Mahidol University, 493–524.Google Scholar

Goldstein, David M. (2015). Review of Baxter and Sagart 2014. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 78.2: 413–14.Google Scholar

Hwang-cherng, Gong 龚煌成 (1977). ‘古藏文的 y 及其相關問題 guzangwen de y ji qixiangguan wenti’ (Ancient Tibetan y and related questions). Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 48.2: 205–28; reprinted in Hwang-cherng, Gong 龔煌城, 漢藏語硏究論文集 Hanzangyu yanjiulun wenji (Collected papers on Sino-Tibetan linguistics). Taipei: 中央硏究院語言學硏 究所籌備處 Zhongyang yanjiu yuan yuyanxue yanjiusuo choubeichu, 2002, 379–99.4Google Scholar

Hwang-cherng, Gong (1980). ‘A comparative study of the Chinese, Tibetan, and Burmese vowel systems’. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 51.3: 455–90; reprinted in Hwang-cherng, Gong 龔煌城, 漢藏語硏究論文集 Hanzangyu yanjiulun wenji (Collected Papers on Sino-Tibetan Linguistics). Taipei: 中央硏究院語言學硏究所籌備處 Zhongyang yanjiuyuan yuyanxue yanjiusuo choubeichu, 2002, 1–30.Google Scholar

Hwang-cherng, Gong (1994). ‘The first palatalization of velars in late Old Chinese’. In honor of William S.-Y. Wang: Interdisciplinary studies on language and language change, Chen, Matthew Y. and Tzeng, Ovid J. L. (eds.), Taipei: Pyramid, 131–42; reprinted in Hwang-cherng, Gong 龔煌城, 漢藏語硏究論文集 Hanzangyu yanjiulun wenji (Collected papers on Sino-Tibetan linguistics). Taipei: 中央硏究院語言學硏究所籌備處 Zhongyang yanjiuyuan yuyanxue yanjiusuo choubeichu, 2002, 66–77.Google Scholar

Hwang-cherng, Gong (1995). ‘The system of finals in Proto-Sino-Tibetan’. The ancestry of the Chinese language. Wang, William S. Y. (ed.), Berkeley: Project on Linguistic Analysis, University of California, 41–92; reprinted in Hwang-cherng, Gong 龔煌城, 漢藏語硏究論文集 Hanzangyu yanjiulun wenji (Collected papers on Sino-Tibetan linguistics). Taipei: 中央硏究院語言學硏究所籌備處 Zhongyang yanjiuyuan yuyanxue yanjiusuo choubeichu, 2002, 79–124.Google Scholar

Hwang-cherng, Gong (2000). ‘從漢藏語的比較看上古漢語的詞頭問題 Cong Hanzangyu de bijao kan Shanggu Hanyu de citou wenti’ (Looking at the problem of prefixes in Old Chinese through Sino-Tibetan comparison.) Language and Linguistics 1.2: 39–62; reprinted in Hwang-cherng, Gong 龔煌城, 漢藏語硏究論文集 Hanzangyu yanjiulun wenji (Collected papers on Sino-Tibetan linguistics). Taipei: 中央硏究院語言學硏究所籌備處 Zhongyang yanjiuyuan yuyanxue yanjiusuo choubeichu, 2002, 161–82.Google Scholar

Xun, Gong (2016a). ‘A phonological history of Amdo Tibetan rhymes’. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 79.2: 347–74.Google Scholar

Xun, Gong (2016b). ‘Prenasalized reflex of Old Tibetan <ld-> and related clusters in Central Tibetan’. Cahiers de linguistique asie orientale 45: 127–47.Google Scholar

Gregerson, Kenneth (1969). ‘A study of Middle Vietnamese phonology’. Bulletin de la Société des études indochinoises 44.2: 135–93.Google Scholar

Gyurme, Kesang (1992). Le clair miroir: Enseignement de la grammaire tibétaine. Stoddard, Heather and Tournadre, Nicolas, trans., Arvillard: Ed. Prajñā.Google Scholar

Hall, T. A. and Hamann, Silke (2010). ‘On the cross-linguistic avoidance of rhotic plus high front vocoid sequences’. Lingua 120: 1821–44.Google Scholar

Handel, Zev (2008). ‘What is Sino-Tibetan? Snapshot of a field and a language family in flux’. Language and Linguistics Compass 2.3: 422–41.Google Scholar

Handel, Zev (2009). Old Chinese medials and their Sino-Tibetan origins: A comparative study. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar

Handel, Zev (2010). ‘Competing methodologies of Chinese dialect fieldwork, and their implications for the study of the history of the Northern Min dialects’. Studies in honor of Jerry Norman, Coblin, W. South, and Yue-Hashimoto, Anne O. (eds.), Hong Kong: Ng Tor-Tai Chinese Language Research Centre, Institute of Chinese Studies, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, 13–39.Google Scholar

Handel, Zev (2012). ‘Valence-changing prefixes and voicing alternation in Old Chinese and Proto-Sino-Tibetan: reconstructing *s- and *N- prefixes’. Language and Linguistics 13.1: 61–81.Google Scholar

Handel, Zev (2014). ‘Historical phonology of Chinese’. The handbook of Chinese linguistics. James Huang, C.-T., Li, Y. H. Audrey, and Simpson, Andrew (eds.), Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 576–98.Google Scholar

Handel, Zev (2016). ‘Does Xǔ Shèn’s huìyì category reflect historical reality? An argument for the existence of compound graphs lacking phonophorics’. New horizons in the study of Chinese: Dialectology, grammar, and philology. Studies in honor of Professor Anne Yue. Ting, Pang-hsin, Cheung, Samuel Hung-nin, Tang, Sze-Wing, and Chin, Andy (eds.), Hong Kong: T. T. Ng Chinese Language Research Centre, Chinese University of Hong Kong, 581–98.Google Scholar

Harbsmeier, Christoph (2016). ‘Irrefutable conjectures: a review of William H. Baxter and Laurent Sagart, Old Chinese. A New Reconstruction’. Monumenta Serica 64.2: 445–504.Google Scholar

Harrison, Paul (1996). ‘A brief history of the Tibetan bKa’ ’gyur’. Tibetan literature: Studies in genre. Cabezón, José Ignacio and Jackson, Roger R. (eds.), Ithaca: Snow Lion Publications, 70–94.Google Scholar

Hartmann, Helga (2001). ‘Prenasalization and preglottalization in Daai Chin and with parallel examples from Mro and Mara’. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 24.2: 123–42.Google Scholar

Haudricourt, André-George (1952). ‘Les voyelles brèves du vietnamien’. Bulletin de la Société de linguistique de Paris 48.1: 90–3.Google Scholar

Haudricourt, André-George (1954a). ‘Comment reconstruire le chinois archaïque’. Word 10.2–3: 351–64.Google Scholar

Haudricourt, André-George (1954b). ‘De l’origine des tons en vietnamien’. Journal asiatique 242: 69–82.Google Scholar

Hazod, Guntram (2009). ‘Imperial Central Tibet: an annotated cartographical survey of its territorial divisions and key political sites’. The old Tibetan annals: An annotated translation of Tibet’s first history. Dotson, Brandon (ed.), Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 161–231.Google Scholar

Hill, Nathan W. (2005). ‘Once more on the letter འ’. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 28.2: 107–37.Google Scholar

Hill, Nathan W. (2007). ‘Aspirated and unaspirated voiceless consonants in Old Tibetan’. Languages and Linguistics 8.2: 471–93.Google Scholar

Hill, Nathan W. (2009). ‘Tibetan <ḥ-> as a plain initial and its place in Old Tibetan phonology’. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 32.1: 115–40.Google Scholar

Hill, Nathan W. (2010a). A lexicon of Tibetan verb stems as reported by the grammatical tradition. Munich: Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar

Hill, Nathan W. (2010b). ‘An overview of Old Tibetan synchronic phonology’. Transactions of the Philological Society 108.2: 110–25.Google Scholar

Hill, Nathan W. (2011a) ‘Alternances entre ḥ et b en tibétain ancien et dans les langues tibétaines modernes’. Revue d’études tibétaines 20: 115–22.Google Scholar

Hill, Nathan W. (2011b). ‘An inventory of Tibetan sound laws’. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain & Ireland (3rd Series) 21.4: 441–57.Google Scholar

Hill, Nathan W. (2011c). ‘Multiple origins of Tibetan o’. Language and Linguistics 12.3: 707–21.Google Scholar

Hill, Nathan W. (2012a). ‘Evolution of the Burmese vowel system’. Transactions of the Philological Society 110.1: 64–79.Google Scholar

Hill, Nathan W. (2012b). ‘The six vowel hypothesis of Old Chinese in comparative context’. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics 6.2: 1–69.Google Scholar

Hill, Nathan W. (2012c). ‘Tibetan palatalization and the gy versus g.y distinction’. Medieval Tibeto-Burman Languages IV. Hill, Nathan W. (ed.), Leiden: Brill, 383–98.Google Scholar

Hill, Nathan W. (2013a) ‘The merger of Proto-Burmish *ts and *č in Burmese’. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics 16: 334–45.Google Scholar

Hill, Nathan W. (2013b) ‘Old Chinese *sm- and the Old Tibetan word for “fire”’. Cahiers de linguistique Asie orientale 42.1: 60–71.Google Scholar

Hill, Nathan W. (2013c) ‘Relative ordering of Tibetan sound changes affecting laterals’. Language and Linguistics 14.1: 193–209.Google Scholar

Hill, Nathan W. (2013d) ‘Three notes on Laufer’s law’. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 36.1: 57–72.Google Scholar

Hill, Nathan W. (2014a). ‘Cognates of Old Chinese *-n, *-r, and *-j in Tibetan and Burmese’. Cahiers de linguistique Asie orientale 43.2: 91–109.Google Scholar

Hill, Nathan W. (2014b). ‘Grammatically conditioned sound change’. Language and Linguistics Compass 8.6: 211–29.Google Scholar

Hill, Nathan W. (2014c). ‘A note on voicing alternation in the Tibetan verbal system’. Transactions of the Philological Society 112.1: 1–4.Google Scholar

Hill, Nathan W. (2014d). ‘Sino-Tibetan: Part 2, Tibetan’. The Oxford handbook of derivational morphology. Lieber, Rochelle and Štekauer, Pavol (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press; 620–30.Google Scholar

Hill, Nathan W. (2014e). ‘Some Tibetan verb forms that violate Dempsey’s law’. Revue d’études tibétaines 29: 91–101.Google Scholar

Hill, Nathan W. (2014f) ‘Tibeto-Burman *dz- > Tibetan z- and related proposals’. Studies in Chinese and Sino-Tibetan linguistics. Simmons, Richard VanNess and Van Auken, Newell Ann (eds.), Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica, 167–78.Google Scholar

Hill, Nathan W. (2015a). ‘The contribution of Tangut to Trans-Himalayan comparative linguistics’. Archiv orientální 83.1: 187–200.Google Scholar

Hill, Nathan W. (2015b). ‘Tibetan *-as > -os’. International Journal of Diachronic Linguistics and Linguistic Reconstruction 12: 163–73.Google Scholar

Hill, Nathan W. (2017a). ‘The evidence for Chinese *-r’. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics 9: 190–204.Google Scholar

Hill, Nathan W. (2017b). Review of Baxter and Sagart 2014. Archiv orientální 85.1: 135–40.Google Scholar

Hill, Nathan W. and List, Johann-Mattis (2017). ‘Challenges of annotation and analysis in computer-assisted language comparison: a case study on Burmish languages’. Yearbook of the Poznań Linguistic Meeting 3.1: 47–76.Google Scholar

Hill, Nathan W. and Zadoks, Abel (2015). ‘Tibetan √lan “reply”’. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain & Ireland (3rd Series) 25.1: 117–21.Google Scholar

Dah-an, Ho (2016). ‘Such errors could have been avoided’ (review of Baxter and Sagart 2014). Journal of Chinese Linguistics 44.1: 175–230.Google Scholar

Hockett, Charles F. (1987). Refurbishing our foundations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Hogg, Richard M. (1992). A grammar of Old English. Vol. 1: Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hombert, Jean-Marie (1978). ‘Consonant types, vowel quality, and tone’. Tone: A linguistic survey. Fromkin, Victoria A. (ed.), New York: Academic Press, 77–112.Google Scholar

Hombert, Jean-Marie, Ohala, John J., and Ewan, William E. (1979). ‘Phonetic explanations for the development of tones’. Language 55.1: 37–58.Google Scholar

Houghton, Bernard (1898). ‘Outlines of Tibeto-Burman linguistic palæontology’. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society: 23–55.Google Scholar

Huehnergard, John (1997). A grammar of Akkadian. Atlanta: Scholars Press.Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry M. (1978). ‘Historical tonology’. Tone: A linguistic survey. Fromkin, Victoria A. (ed.), New York: Academic Press, 257–69.Google Scholar

Hyslop, Gwendolyn (2008). ‘Kurtöp and the classification of the languages of Bhutan’. Proceedings from the 44th meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 141–52.Google Scholar

Hyslop, Gwendolyn (2011). ‘A grammar of Kurtöp’. Eugene: University of Oregon PhD dissertation.Google Scholar

Hyslop, Gwendolyn (2013). ‘On the internal phylology of East Bodish’. North East Indian linguistics: Vol. 5. Hyslop, Gwendolyn, Morey, Stephen, and Post, Mark W. (eds.), Delhi: Cambridge University Press India, 91–110.Google Scholar

Ikeda, Takumi (2012). ‘Highlights in the decipherment of the Nam language’. Medieval Tibeto-Burman languages IV. Hill, Nathan W. (ed.), Leiden: Brill, 111–19.Google Scholar

Imaeda, Yoshiro (2008). ‘The Provenance and Character of the Dunhuang Documents’. Memoirs of the Toyo Bunko 66: 81–102.Google Scholar

Imaeda, Yoshiro, Takeuchi, Tsuguhito, Hoshi, Izumi, Ohara, Yoshimichi, Ishikawa, Iwao, Iwao, Kazushi, Nishida, Ai, and Dotson, Brandon (2007). Tibetan documents from Dunhuang: Kept at the Bibliothèque nationale de France and the British Library. Tokyo: Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar

Iwao, Ishikawa 石川巌 (1998). ‘古代チベット語 chab srid および chu srid の語義. Kodai Chibettogo chab srid oyobi chu srid no gogi’ (The meaning of the words chab srid and chu srid in Old Tibetan). 内陸アジア史研究 Nairiku Ajiashi kenkyū 13.3: 35–54.Google Scholar

Iwao, Kazushi, Hill, Nathan W., and Tsuguhito, Takeuchi (2009). Old Tibetan inscriptions. Tokyo: Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar

Iwao, Kazushi, van Schaik, Sam and Takeuchi, Tsuguhito (2012). Old Tibetan texts in the Stein collection Or.8210. Tokyo: Toyo Bunko.Google Scholar

Jacques, Guillaume (2000). ‘The character 維, 惟, 唯 ywij and the reconstruction of the 脂 Zhi and 微 Wei rhymes’. Cahiers de linguistique – Asie orientale 29.2: 205–22.Google Scholar

Jacques, Guillaume (2001). ‘Les préfxes nominaux d- /g- en tibétain classique. Quinzième journée de linguistique – Asie orientale’, EHESS, Paris, 6 August 2001.Google Scholar

Jacques, Guillaume (2004a). ‘The laterals in Tibetan’. Paper given at the 10th Himalayan languages symposium, Thimphu, Bhutan, 1–3 December 2004.Google Scholar

Jacques, Guillaume (2004b). ‘Phonologie et morphologie du Japhug (rGyalrong)’. Paris: Université Paris VII – Denis Diderot PhD dissertation.Google Scholar

Jacques, Guillaume (2006). ‘Introduction to Chinese historical phonology’. European Association of Chinese Linguistics Spring School in Chinese Linguistics, International Institute for Asian Studies, Leiden, 27–31 March 2006 (available online).Google Scholar

Jacques, Guillaume 向柏霖 (2008). 嘉絨語研究 Jiarongyu yanjiu (Study of the Rgyalrong language). Beijing: 民族出版社 Minzu Chubanshe.Google Scholar

Jacques, Guillaume (2009). ‘Tibetan wa-zur and Laufer’s law’. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 32.1: 141–5.Google Scholar

Jacques, Guillaume (2010). ‘Notes complementaires sur les verbes à alternance ‘dr-⁄br en tibétain’. Revue d’études tibétaines 19: 27–9.Google Scholar

Jacques, Guillaume (2012a). ‘Agreement morphology: the case of Rgyalrongic and Kiranti’. Language and Linguistics 13.1: 83–116.Google Scholar

Jacques, Guillaume (2012b). ‘An internal reconstruction of Tibetan stem alternations’. Transactions of the Philological Society 110.2: 212–24.Google Scholar

Jacques, Guillaume (2012c). ‘A new transcription system for Old and Classical Tibetan’. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 35.2: 89–96.Google Scholar

Jacques, Guillaume (2013). ‘On pre-Tibetan semivowels’. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 76.2: 289–300.Google Scholar

Jacques, Guillaume (2014a). ‘Denominal affixes as sources of antipassive markers in Japhug Rgyalrong’. Lingua 138: 1–22.Google Scholar

Jacques, Guillaume (2014b). Esquisse de phonologie et de morphologie historique du Tangoute. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Jacques, Guillaume (2014c). ‘On Coblin’s Law’. Studies in Chinese and Sino-Tibetan Linguistics. Simmons, Richard VanNess and Van Auken, Newell Ann (eds.), Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica, 155–65.Google Scholar

Jacques, Guillaume (2015). ‘On the cluster *sr- in Sino-Tibetan’. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 43.1: 215–23.Google Scholar

Jacques, Guillaume (2017a). ‘L’étymologie de ginseng’. Panchronica, 12 April 2017, https://panchr.hypotheses.org/1719.Google Scholar

Jacques, Guillaume (2017b). ‘The genetic position of Chinese’. Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics, Vol. 2. Sybesma, Rint, Behr, Wolfgang, Gu, Yueguo, Handel, Zev, Huang, C.-T. James, and Myers, James (eds.), Leiden: Brill, 297–305.Google Scholar

Jacques, Guillaume (2017c). ‘Traditional Chinese phonology’. Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics, Vol. 4. Sybesma, Rint, Behr, Wolfgang, Gu, Yueguo, Handel, Zev, Huang, C.-T. James, and Myers, James (eds.), Leiden: Brill, 376–91.Google Scholar

Jacques, Guillaume and Michaud, Alexis (2011). ‘Approaching the historical phonology of three highly eroded Sino-Tibetan languages: Naxi, Na and Laze’. Diachronica 28.4: 468–98 and online appendix 1–25.Google Scholar

Jacques, Guillaume and Zhen, Chen (2010). Une version rgyalrong de l’épopée de Gesar. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.Google Scholar

Jankowsky, Kurt R. (1972). The neogrammarians: A re-evaluation of their place in the development of linguistic science. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Jaxontov, Sergej Evgen′evič (1960a). Consonant combinations in archaic Chinese (papers presented by the USSR delegation of the 25the International Congress of Orientalists, Moscow) Moscow: Oriental Literature Publishing House.Google Scholar

Jaxontov, Sergej Evgen′ejvič (1960b). ‘Фонетика китайского языка 1 тысячелетия до н. э. (лабиализованные гласные)’. Проблемы Востоковедения 6: 102–15.Google Scholar

Jaxontov, Sergej Evgen′ejvič (1970). ‘The phonology of Chinese of the first millennium b.c. (rounded vowels)’. Chi Lin/Unicorn 6: 52–75 (a translation by Norman, Jerry of Jaxontov 1960b).Google Scholar

Jensen, Cheryl (1999). ‘Tupi-guarani’. The Amazonian languages. Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 125–64.Google Scholar

Peng, Jin 金鵬 (1958). 藏語拉薩日喀則昌都話的比較硏究 Zangyu Lasa, Rikeze, Changdu hua di bijiao yanjiu (Tibetan language: A comparative study of the Lha sa, Gźis-ka-rtse, and Chab-mdo dialects). Beijing: 科学出版社 Kexue chubanshe.Google Scholar

Jones, Robert B. (1972). ‘Sketch of Burmese dialects’. Studies in linguistics in honor or George L. Trager. Smith, M. Estellie (ed.), The Hague: Mouton, 413–22.Google Scholar

Joseph, John E. (2012). Saussure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Karlgren, Bernhard (1923). Analytic dictionary of Chinese and Sino-Japanese. Paris: Librarie Orientaliste Paul Geuthner.Google Scholar

Karlgren, Bernhard (1931). ‘Tibetan and Chinese’. T’oung Pao (2nd Series) 28.1–2: 25–70.Google Scholar

Karlgren, Bernhard (1933). ‘Word families in Chinese’. Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities 5: 9–120.Google Scholar

Karlgren, Bernhard (1944). ‘Glosses on the Siao ya odes’. Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities 16: 25–139.Google Scholar

Karlgren, Bernhard (1946). ‘Glosses on the Ta Ya and Sung Odes’. Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities 18: 1–198.Google Scholar

Karlgren, Bernhard (1950). The book of odes: Chinese text, transcription and translation. Stockholm: Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities.Google Scholar

Karlgren, Bernhard (1964 [1957]). Grammata Serica recensa. Gothenburg: Elanders Boktryckeri Aktiebolag.Google Scholar

Keightley, David N. (1978). Sources of Shang history: The oracle-bone inscriptions of Bronze Age China. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Krech, Uwe (2012). ‘A preliminary reassessment of the Pyu faces of the Myazedi inscriptions at Pagan’. Medieval Tibeto-Burman languages IV. Hill, Nathan W. (ed.), Leiden: Brill, 120–70.Google Scholar

Kühner, Raphael (1834–5). Ausführliche Grammatik der griechischen Sprache, Wissenschaftlich und mit Rücksicht auf den Schulgebrauch. Hannover: Hahnsche Hofbuchhandlung.Google Scholar

Kühner, Raphael (1836). Schulgrammatik der griechischen Sprache. Hannover: Im Vertrage der Hahnschen Hofbuchhandlung.Google Scholar

Kühner, Raphael (1843). Schulgrammatik der griechischen Sprache, 2nd edn. Hannover: Im Vertrage der Hahnschen Hofbuchhandlung.Google Scholar

Kümmel, Martin (2007). Konsonantenwandel: Bausteine zu einer Typologie des Lautwandels und ihre Konsequenzen für die vergleichende Rekonstruktion. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar

Lalou, Marcelle (1939–61). Inventaire des manuscrits tibétains de Touen-houang conservés à la Bibliothèque nationale (Fonds Pelliot tibétain). Paris: Bibliothèque nationale.Google Scholar

Lama, Ziwo Qiu-Fuyuan (2012). ‘Subgrouping of Nisoic (Yi) languages’. Arlington: University of Texas PhD dissertation.Google Scholar

LaPolla, Randy J. (2003). ‘Overview of Sino-Tibetan morphosyntax’. The Sino-Tibetan languages. Thurgood, Graham and LaPolla, Randy J. (eds.), London: Routledge, 22–42.Google Scholar

Laufer, Berthold (1898/1899). ‘Ueber das va zur: Ein Beitrag zur Phonetik der tibetischen Sprache’. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 12: 289–307; 13: 95–109, 199–226; reprinted in Walravens, Hartmut (ed.) Kleinere Schriften von Berthold Laufer. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag, 1976: 61–122.Google Scholar

Laufer, Berthold (1914). ‘Bird divination among the Tibetans (notes on document Pelliot No. 3530, with a study of Tibetan phonology of the ninth century)’. T’oung Pao (2nd Series) 15.1: 1–110.Google Scholar

Laufer, Berthold (1918). ‘Origin of Tibetan writing’. Journal of the American Oriental Society 38: 34–46.Google Scholar

Lee, Don (1981). The history of early relations between China and Tibet. Bloomington: Eastern Press.Google Scholar

Leumann, Manu (1977). Lateinische Laut- und Formenlehre. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar

Lha mčhog skyabs (2011). ‘Btsan po khri lde btsug brtsan skabs kyi ǰag rog dgaḫ ldan byin čhen gtsug lag khaṅ gi dril buḫi kha byaṅ gi yi ger dpyad pa’ (Remarks on the text of a bell of the J̌ag rog dgaḫ ldan byin čhen sanctuary from the time of Emperor Khri lde btsug brtsan). Bod lǰoṅs źib ḫǰug/Tibetan Studies 2011.1: 1–9.Google Scholar

Fang-kuei, Li (1933). ‘Certain phonetic influences of the Tibetan prefixes upon the root initials’. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 6.2: 135–57.Google Scholar

Fang-kuei, Li (1959). ‘Tibetan Glo-ba-‘dring’. Studia Serica Bemhard Karlgren dedicata. Egerod, Søren and Glahn, Else (eds.), Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard, 55–9.Google Scholar

Fang-kuei, Li (1959). A handbook of comparative Tai. Honolulu: The University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar

Fang-kuei, Li (1971). ‘上古音研究 Shanggu yin yanjiu’. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 9.1–2: 1–61.Google Scholar

Fang-kuei, Li (1974–5). ‘Studies on archaic Chinese’. Mattos, Gilbert L., trans. Monumenta Serica 31: 219–87.Google Scholar

Fang-kuei, Li (1977). A handbook of comparative Tai. Manoa: The University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar

Fang-kuei, Li and Coblin, W. South (1987). A study of the old Tibetan inscriptions. Taipei: Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar

Yuchun, Long 龍宇純 (1968). 唐寫全本王仁昫刊謬補缺切韻校箋 Tang xie quanben Wang Renxu Kanmiu buque Qieyun jiao jian. Hong Kong: 香港中文大學 Xianggang Zhongwen daxue.Google Scholar

Lottner, Carl (1862). ‘Ausnahmen der ersten lautverschiebung’. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung auf dem Gebiete des Deutschen, Griechischen und Lateinischen 11.3–4: 161–205.Google Scholar

Shaozun, Lu 陸紹尊 (ed.) (1986). 錯那門巴語簡志 Cuona Menbayu jianzhi (Brief description of the Mtsho-sna Monpa language). Beijing: 民族出版社 Minzu chubanshe.Google Scholar

Luce, Gordon H. (1985). Phases of pre-Pagán Burma: Languages and history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lustig, Anton (2010). A grammar and dictionary of Zaiwa. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Mann, Noel Walter (1998). ‘A phonological reconstruction of Proto Northern Burmic’. Arlington: University of Texas MA thesis.Google Scholar

Martin, Dan (2010). ‘Zhangzhung dictionary’. Revue des études tibétains 18: 5–254.Google Scholar

Martin, Dan (2013). ‘Knowing Zhang-zhung: the very idea’. Journal of the International Association for Bon Research 1: 175–97.Google Scholar

Masica, Colin (1991). The Indo-Aryan languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Matisoff, James A. (1968). Review of Robbins Burling, Proto-Lolo-Burmese. Language 44.4: 879–97.Google Scholar

Matisoff, James A. (1972). The Loloish tonal split revisited. Berkeley: Center for South and Southeast Asia Studies, University of California.Google Scholar

Matisoff, James A. (1978). Variational semantics in Tibeto-Burman: The ‘organic’ approach to linguistic comparison (Occasional Papers of the Wolfenden Society on Tibeto-Burman Linguistics, Vol. 6) Philadelphia: Publication of the Institute for the Study of Human Issues (ISHI).Google Scholar

Matisoff, James A. (1985). ‘God and the Sino-Tibetan copula with some good news concerning selected Tibeto-Burman rhymes’ アジア·アフリカ言語文化研究 Journal of Asian and African Studies 29: 1–81.Google Scholar

Matisoff, James A. (2003). Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: system and philosophy of Sino-Tibeto-Burman reconstruction. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Matisoff, James A. (2007). ‘Response to Laurent Sagart’s review of Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and philosophy of Sino-Tibetan reconstruction’. Diachronica 24.2: 435–44.Google Scholar

Matisoff, James A. (2015). ‘On the demise of the Proto-Tibeto-Burman mid vowels’. Bulletin of the National Museum of Ethnology 39.3: 375–96.Google Scholar

Mei, Tsu-lin (1970). ‘Tones and prosody in Middle Chinese and the origin of the rising tone’. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 30: 86–110.Google Scholar

Michailovsky, Boyd and Mazaudon, Martine (1994). ‘Preliminary notes on the languages of the Bumthang group (Bhutan)’. Tibetan Studies: Proceedings of the 6th seminar of the International Association for Tibetan Studies. Vol. 2. Kværne, Per (ed.), Oslo: The Institute of Comparative Research in Human Culture, 545–57.Google Scholar

Michaud, Alexis (2012). ‘Monosyllabicization: patterns of evolution in Asian languages’. Nau, Nicole, Stolz, Thomas, and Stroh, Corelia (eds.), Monosyllables: From phonology to typology. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 115–30.Google Scholar

Migot, A. (1957). ‘Recherches sur les dialectes tibétains du Si-k’ang. Province de Khams)’. Bulletin de l’École française d’extrême orient 48: 417–562.Google Scholar

Miller, Roy Andrew (1956). ‘The Tibeto-Burman ablaut system’. 国際東方学者会議紀要 Kokusai Tōhō Gakusha Kaigi kiyō/Transactions of the International Conference of Orientalists in Japan 1: 29–56.Google Scholar

Miller, Roy Andrew (1974). ‘Sino-Tibetan: inspection of a conspectus’. Journal of the American Oriental Society 94.2: 195–209.Google Scholar

Miyake, Marc (2012). ‘Complexity from compression: a sketch of Pre-Tangut’. Тангуты в Центральной Азии: сборник статей в честь 80-летия проф. Е.И.Кычанова (Tanguts in Central Asia: a collection of articles marking the 80th anniversary of Prof. E. I. Kychanov). Popova, Irina (ed.), Moscow: Oriental Literature, 244–61.Google Scholar

Moscati, Sabatino (1964). An introduction to the comparative grammar of the Semitic languages: Phonology and morphology. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Müller-Witte, Frank (2009). ‘Handlungsrichtung im Tibetischen: Die Verbalkategorien bdag und gzhan bei dPa’ ris sangs rgyas und Dor zhi gdong drug und ihr Nutzen für das Verständnis tibetischer Texte’. Munich: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität PhD dissertation.Google Scholar

Myanmar Language Commission (ed.) (1993). Myanmar–English dictionary. Rangoon: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar

Naksuk, Yuttaporn (2012). ‘Intha phonology and lexicon with comparison to three Burmese dialects (Yangon, Arakan, and Tavoyan)’. Bangkok: Mahidol University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar

Phong, Nguyễn Phú, Dõi, Trần Trí, and Ferlus, Michel (1988). Lexique vietnamien–ruc–français. Paris: Sudestasie.Google Scholar

Nishi, Yoshio 西 義郎 (1974). ‘ビルマ文語の-acについて Birumabungo-no -ac-ni tsuite’ (On -ac in Burmese). 東洋学報 Tōyō gakuhō 56.1: 1–43 (English translation published as Nishi 2016).Google Scholar

Nishi, Yoshio (1999). Four papers on Burmese: Toward the history of Burmese (the Myanmar language). Tokyo: Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar

Nishi, Yoshio (2016). ‘Proto-Lolo-Burmese and Old Burmese sources of Written Burmese -ac’. Journal of the South East Asian Linguistics Society 9: 97–129 (English translation of Nishi 1974).Google Scholar

Nishida, Tatsuo 西田龍雄 (1955). ‘Myazedi 碑文における中古ビルマ語の研究 Myazedi hibun ni okeru chūko biruma go no kenkyū. Studies in the later ancient Burmese Language through Myazedi Inscriptions’. 古代學 Kodaigaku Palaeologia 4.1: 17–31, 5.1: 22–40.Google Scholar

Nishida, Tatsuo 西田竜雄 (1972). 緬甸館譯語の研究: ビルマ言語學序說 Mendenkan yakugo no kenkyū: Biruma gengogaku josetsu/A Study of the Burmese–Chinese vocabulary, Mien-tien-kuan i-yu. Kyoto: 松香堂 Shōkadō.Google Scholar

Nishida, Tatsuo (1977). ‘Some problems in the comparison of Tibetan, Burmese and Kachin languages’. 音声科学研究 Studia phonologica 11: 1–24.Google Scholar

Tatsuo, Nishida (1988). ‘The mTsho-sna Monpa language of China and its place in the Tibeto-Burman family’. Prosodic analysis and Asian linguistics to honour R. K. Sprigg. Bradley, David, Henderson, Eugénie J. A., and Mazaudon, Martine (eds.), Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University, 223–36.Google Scholar

Norman, Jerry (1973). ‘Tonal development in Min’. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 1.2: 222–38.Google Scholar

Norman, Jerry (1994). ‘Pharyngealization in early Chinese’. Journal of the American Oriental Society 114.3: 397–408.Google Scholar

Norman, Jerry (羅杰瑞) (2007). ‘漢語方言田野調查與音韻學 Hanyu fangyan tianyediaocha yu yinyunxue’ (Chinese dialect fieldwork and phonology). 北京大學學報（哲學社會科學版） Beijing Daxue xuebao (zhexue shehui kexueban)/Journal of Peking University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 44.2: 91–4.Google Scholar

Nylan, Michael (2001). The five ‘Confucian’ classics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Oh, Young (2017). ‘Rime dictionaries’. Encyclopedia of Chinese Language and Linguistics, Vol. 3. Sybesma, Rint, Behr, Wolfgang, Yueguo, Gu, Handel, Zev, Huang, C.-T. James, and Myers, James (eds.), Leiden: Brill, 600–8.Google Scholar

Okell, John (1971). ‘K clusters in Proto-Burmese’. Conference presentation at the Sino-Tibetan Conference, 8–9 October 1971, Bloomington, Indiana.Google Scholar

Okell, John (1995). ‘Three Burmese dialects’. Studies in Burmese Languages. Bradley, David (ed.). Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University, 1–138.Google Scholar

Wuyun, Pan 潘悟云 (1997). ‘喉音考 Houyin kao’ (A study of gutturals). 民族語文 Minzu Yuwen 1997.5: 10–24.Google Scholar

Wuyun, Pan 潘悟云 (2000). ‘緬甸文元音的轉寫 Miandianwen yuanyin de zhuanxie’ (The Transliteration of Vowels of Burman Script). 民族語文 Minzu Yuwen 2000.2: 17–21.Google Scholar

Peiros, Ilia and Starostin, Sergei. (1996). A comparative vocabulary of Five Sino-Tibetan languages. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne, Department of Linguistics and Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar

Pelliot, Paul (1961). Histoire ancienne du Tibet. Paris: Adrien-Maisonneuve.Google Scholar

Petech, Luciano (1977). The kingdom of Ladakh c.950–1842 a.d. (Serie Orientale Roma 51) Rome: Istituto Italiano per il media ed Estremo Oriente.Google Scholar

Pittayaporn, Pittayawat (2009). ‘The phonology of Proto-Tai’. Cornell University PhD thesis.Google Scholar

Post, Mark W. (2012). ‘The language, culture, environment and origins of Proto-Tani speakers: what is knowable, and what is not (yet)’. Origins and migrations in the extended eastern Himalayas. Blackburn, Stuart and Huber, Toni (eds.), Leiden: Brill, 153–86.Google Scholar

Preiswerk, Thomas (2014). ‘Die Phonologie des Alttibetischen auf Grund der chinesischen Beamtennamen im chinesisch–tibetischen Abkommen von 822 n. Chr’. Zentralasiatische Studien 43: 7–158.Google Scholar

Pulleyblank, Edwin G. (1962). ‘The consonantal system of Old Chinese’. Asia Major (New Series) 9 (1962): 58–144, 206–65.Google Scholar

Pulleyblank, Edwin G. (1963). ‘An interpretation of the vowel systems of Old Chinese and of Written Burmese’. Asia Major (New Series) 10.2: 200–21.Google Scholar

Pulleyblank, Edwin G. (1965). ‘The transcription of Sanskrit k and kh in Chinese’. Asia Major (New Series) 11: 199–210.Google Scholar

Pulleyblank, Edwin G. (1970). ‘Late Middle Chinese’. Asia Major (New Series) 15: 197–239.Google Scholar

Pulleyblank, Edwin G. (1973). ‘Some new hypotheses concerning word families in Chinese’. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 1.1: 111–25.Google Scholar

Pulleyblank, Edwin G. (1983). ‘Stages in the transcription of Indian words in Chinese from Han to Tang’. Sprachen des Buddhismus in Zentralasien. Rohrborn, Klaus and Veenker, Wolfgang (eds.), Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz, 73–102.Google Scholar

Ringe, Donald (2006). A history of English: From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

de Roerich, George (1931). ‘Modern Tibetan phonology: with special reference to the dialects of central Tibet’. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 27: 285–312.Google Scholar

de Roerich, George (1933). Dialects of Tibet: The Tibetan dialect of Lahul (Tibetica 1). New York: Urusvati Himalayan Research Institute of Roerich Museum.Google Scholar

Sagart, Laurent (1993). ‘New views on Old Chinese phonology’ (review of Baxter 1992). Diachronica 10.2: 237–60.Google Scholar

Sagart, Laurent (1999a). ‘The origin of Chinese tones’. Proceedings of the Symposium Cross-linguistic Studies of Tonal Phenomena, Tonogenesis, Typology, and Related Topics. Kaji, Shigeki (ed.), Tokyo: Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa (ILCAA), Tokyo University of Foreign Studies, 91–104.Google Scholar

Sagart, Laurent (1999b). The roots of Old Chinese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Pub. Co.Google Scholar

Sagart, Laurent (2004). ‘The Chinese names of the four directions’. Journal of the American Oriental Society 124.1: 69–76.Google Scholar

Sagart, Laurent (2006). ‘Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: system and philosophy of Sino-Tibeto-Burman reconstruction. By James A. Matisoff’. Diachronica 23.1: 206–23.Google Scholar

Sagart, Laurent (2014). ‘A note on Tibeto-Burman bone words and Chinese pitch-pipes’. Studies in Chinese and Sino-Tibetan Linguistics: Dialect, Phonology, Transcription and Text. Simmons, Richard VanNess and Van Auken, Newell Ann (eds.), Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, 179–83.Google Scholar

Sagart, Laurent (2017). ‘A candidate for a Tibeto-Burman innovation’. Cahiers de linguistique – Asie orientale 46.1: 101–19.Google Scholar

Sagart, Laurent and Baxter, William H. (2009). ‘Reconstructing Old Chinese uvulars in the Baxter–Sagart system (version 0.99)’. Cahiers de linguistique – Asie orientale 38.2: 221–44.Google Scholar

Sagart, Laurent (沙加尔) and Baxter, William (白一平) (2010). ‘Shànggǔ Hànyǔ de N- hé m- qiánzhuì 上古汉语的N-和 m-前缀’. Hàn-Zàngyǔ xuébào 汉藏语学报 (Journal of Sino-Tibetan Linguistics) 4: 62–9.Google Scholar

Sagart, Laurent and Baxter, William H. (2012). ‘Reconstructing the *s- prefix in Old Chinese’. Language and Linguistics 13.1: 29–59.Google Scholar

de Saussure, Ferdinand (1879). Mémoire sur le système primitif des voyelles dans les langues indo-européennes. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar

Sawyer, Ralph D. and Sawyer, Mei-chün (1993). The seven military classics of ancient China. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar

van Schaik, Sam (2013). ‘Dating early Tibetan manuscripts: a paleographic method’. Scribes, texts, and rituals in early Tibet and Dunhuang. Dotson, Brandon, Iwao, Kazushi, and Takeuchi, Tsuguhito (eds.), Wiesbaden: Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag, 119–35.Google Scholar

Schiefner, Anton (1852). ‘Tibetischen Studien’. Mélanges asiatiques tirés du Bulletin de l’Académie impériale des sciences de St.-Pétersboug 1: 324–94.Google Scholar

Schuessler, Axel (1974). ‘Final -l in archaic Chinese’. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 2: 79–87.Google Scholar

Schuessler, Axel (2002). ‘Tenues aspiratae im Altchinesichen’. Und folge nun dem, was mein Herz begehrt: Festschrift für Ulrich Unger zum 70. Geburtstag, Vol. 1. Emmerich, Reinhard and Stumpfeldt, Hans (eds.), Hamburg: Hamburger Sinologische Gesellschaft, 155–64.Google Scholar

Schuessler, Axel (2007). ABC etymological dictionary of Old Chinese. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar

Schuessler, Axel (2009). Minimal Old Chinese and later Han Chinese. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar

Schuessler, Axel (2015). ‘New Old Chinese’ (review of Baxter and Sagart 2014). Diachronica 32.4: 571–98.Google Scholar

Schwieger, Peter (2009). Handbuch zur Grammatik der klassischen tibetischen Schriftsprache, 2nd edn. Halle (Saale): International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies.Google Scholar

Sedláček, Kamil (1959). ‘The tonal system of Tibetan, Lhasa dialect’. T’oung Pao 47: 181–250.Google Scholar

Shafer, Robert (1940). ‘The vocalism of Sino-Tibetan [part 1]’. Journal of the American Oriental Society 60.3: 302–37.Google Scholar

Shafer, Robert (1941). ‘The vocalism of Sino-Tibetan [part 2]’. Journal of the American Oriental Society 61.1: 18–31.Google Scholar

Shafer, Robert (1951). ‘Studies in the morphology of Bodic verbs (continued)’. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 13.4: 1017–31.Google Scholar

Shafer, Robert (1955). ‘Classification of the Sino-Tibetan languages’. Word 11: 94–111.Google Scholar

Shafer, Robert (1966). Introduction to Sino-Tibetan. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Shaughnessy, Edward L. (1991). Sources of Western Zhou history: Inscribed bronze vessels. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Shen, Ruiqing (2017). ‘Děng 等 (division and rank)’. Encyclopedia of Chinese Language and Linguistics, Vol. 2. Sybesma, Rint, Behr, Wolfgang, Gu, Yueguo, Handel, Zev, Huang, C.-T. James, and Myers, James (eds.), Leiden: Brill, 13–20.Google Scholar

Shen, Zhongwei (2005). ‘The 重紐 chongniu contrast in the Menggu Ziyun 蒙古字韻: patterns and explanations’. Essays in Chinese historical linguistics: A Festschrift in memory of Professor Li Fang-Kuei on his centennial birthday. Ting, P.-H. and Yue, A. (eds.), Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica, 163–90.Google Scholar

Simon, Walter (1929). ‘Tibetisch-Chinesische Wortgleichungen: Ein Versuch’. Mitteilungen des Seminars für Orientalische Sprachen an der Friedrich Wilhelms-Universität zu Berlin 32: 157–228.Google Scholar

Simon, Walter (1938). ‘The reconstruction of archaic Chinese’. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 9.2: 267–88.Google Scholar

Sprigg, Richard Keith (1974). ‘The main features of the Tibetan dialect’. Bulletin of Tibetology 11.1: 11–15.Google Scholar

So-Hartmann, Helga (2009). A descriptive grammar of Daai Chin. Berkeley: Sino-Tibetan Etymological Dictionary and Thesaurus Project.Google Scholar

Starostin, George (2015). Review of Baxter and Sagart 2014. Journal of Language Relationship 13.4: 383–9.Google Scholar

Starostin, Sergej Anatol′evič (1989). Реконструкция древнекитайской фонологической системы/Rekonstrukcija drevnekitajskoj fonologičeskoj sistemy (Reconstruction of Old Chinese phonological system). Moscow: ‘Nauka’. Glavnaja redakcija vostočnoj literatury.Google Scholar

Sun, Jackson T. S. (2003). ‘Phonological profile of Zhongu: a new Tibetan dialect of Northern Sichuan’. Language & Linguistics 4.4: 769–836.Google Scholar

Takashima, Ken’ichi (2000). ‘Towards a more rigorous methodology of deciphering oracle-bone inscriptions’. T’oung Pao (2nd Series) 86.4–5: 363–99.Google Scholar

Takashima, Ken’ichi (2012). ‘Etymology and palaeography of the yellow hé 河’. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 40.2: 269–306.Google Scholar

Takata, Tokio (2004). ‘The Chinese language in Turfan with a special focus on the Qieyun fragments’. Turfan revisited: The first century of research into the arts and cultures of the Silk Road, Durkin-Meisterernst, Desmond (ed.), Berlin: Reimer, 333–40.Google Scholar

Takata, Tokio (2006). ‘A note on the Lijiang Tibetan inscription’. Asia Major (3rd Series) 19: 161–70.Google Scholar

Takeuchi, Tsuguhito (1990). ‘A group of Old Tibetan letters written under Kuei-i-chun: a preliminary study for the classification of Old Tibetan letters’. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 44.1–2: 175–90.Google Scholar

Takeuchi, Tsuguhito (1997–8). Old Tibetan manuscripts from East Turkestan in the Stein Collection of the British Library. Tokyo: The Centre for East Asian Cultural Studies for Unesco, The Toyo Bunko, London: British Library.Google Scholar

Takeuchi, Tsuguhito (2012a). ‘Formation and transformation of Old Tibetan’. Historical Development of the Tibetan Languages. Takeuchi, Tsuguhito and Hayashi, Norihiko (eds.), Kobe: Research Institute of Foreign Studies, Kobe University of Foreign Studies, 3–18.Google Scholar

Takeuchi, Tsuguhito (2012b). ‘Old Tibetan Buddhist texts from the post-Tibetan imperial period (mid-9c. to late 10c.)’. Old Tibetan Studies: Proceedings of the tenth seminar of the IATS 2003. Scherrer-Schaub, Christina (ed.), Leiden: Brill, 205–14.Google Scholar

Takeuchi, Tsuguhito and Nishida, Ai (2009). ‘The present stage of deciphering Old Zhangzhung’. Issues in Tibeto-Burman historical linguistics. Nagano, Yasuhiko (ed.), Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology, 151–65.Google Scholar

Zuobao, Tang 唐作薄 (2002). 音韻學教程 Yinyunxue Jiaocheng (Textbook of traditional phonology). Beijing: 北京大學出版社 Beijing daxue chubanshe.Google Scholar

Tauscher, Helmut (2008). Catalogue of the Gondhla proto-Kanjur. Vienna: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Universität Wien.Google Scholar

Temple, Ross (2012). ‘Conditioning environments of old Tibetan palatalization’. MA thesis, Indiana University.Google Scholar

Thomas, Frederick William (1948). Nam, an ancient language of the Sino-Tibetan borderland. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Thomas, Frederick William (2011). Research notes on the Zhangzhung language by Frederick W. Thomas at the British Library. Takeuchi, Tsuguhito, Quessel, Burkhard, and Nagano, Yasuhiko (eds.), Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.Google Scholar

Thurgood, Graham (1981). Review of Bradley 1979. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 44.3: 622–3.Google Scholar

Tournadre, Nicolas and Dorje, Sangda (2009). Manuel de tibétain standard, 3rd edn. Paris: L’asiathèque.Google Scholar

Tournadre, Nicolas and Rigzin, Karma (2015). ‘Outlines of Chocha-ngachakha: An undocumented language of Bhutan related to Dzongkha’. Himalayan Linguistics 14.2: 1–39.Google Scholar

Uray, Géza (1952). ‘A Tibetan diminutive suffix’. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 2: 182–220.Google Scholar

Uray, Géza (1953). ‘Some problems of the ancient Tibetan verbal morphology: methodological observations on recent studies’. Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 3: 37–62.Google Scholar

Uray, Géza (1955). ‘On the Tibetan letters ba and wa: Contribution to the origin and history of the Tibetan alphabet’. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 5.1: 101–21.Google Scholar

Uray, Géza (1968). ‘A chronological problem in the Old Tibetan Chronicle’. Acta orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 11: 268–9.Google Scholar

Uray, Géza (1981). ‘L’emploi du tibétain dans les chancelleries des états du Kan-sou et de Khotan postérieurs à la domination tibétaine’. Journal Asiatique 269.1–2: 81–90.Google Scholar

Uray, Géza (1988) ‘New contributions to Tibetan documents from the post-Tibetan Tun-huang’. Tibetan Studies: Proceedings of the 4th Seminar of the International Association for Tibetan Studies Schloss Hohenkammer – Munich 1985. Uebach, Helga and Panglung, Jampa L. (eds.). (Studia Tibetica: Quellen und Studien zur tibetische Lexicographie 2). Munich: Kommission für Zentralasiatische Studien Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 514–28.Google Scholar

Vovin, Alexander (2007). ‘Once again on the etymology of the title qaγan’. Studia etymologica cracoviensia 12: 177–87.Google Scholar

Li, Wang 王力 (1980). 楚辞韵读 Shijing yundu. Shanghai: 上海古籍 Shànghǎi Gǔjī.Google Scholar

Xian, Wang 王顯 (2011). 詩經韻譜 Shijing yunpu. Beijing: 商務印書館 Shāngwù Yìnshūguǎn.Google Scholar

Watkins, Justin W. (2001). ‘Burmese’. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 31.2: 291–5.Google Scholar

Wolfenden, Stuart N. (1938). ‘Concerning the origins of Tibetan brgi̯ad and Chinese 八 “pwât”’. T’oung Pao 34.3: 165–73.Google Scholar

Wun, Maung (1975). ‘Development of the Burmese language in the medieval period’. 大阪外国語大学学報 Ōsaka gaikokugo daigaku gakuhō 36: 63–119.Google Scholar

Yabu, Shirō 藪 司郎 (1982). アツィ語基礎語彙集 Atsigo kiso goishū/Classified dictionary of the Atsi or Zaiwa language (Sadon dialect) with Atsi, Japanese and English indexes. Tokyo: 東京外国語大学アジアヶアフリカ言語文化研究所 Tōkyō Gaikokugo Daigaku Ajia Afurika Gengo Bunka Kenkyūjo.Google Scholar

Yabu, Shiro 藪 司郎 (2006). 古ビルマ語資料におけるミャゼディ碑文<1112年>の古ビルマ語/Kobirumago shiryō ni okeru myazedi hibun senhyakujūninen no kobirumago ōbī/Old Burmese (OB) of Myazedi inscription in OB materials. Osaka: Osaka University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar

Yanson, Rudolf (1990). Вопросы фонологии древнебирманского языка. Voprosy fonologii drevnebirmanskogo jazyka (Topics in the phonology of Old Burmese). Moscow: Nauk.Google Scholar

Yanson, Rudolf (2006). ‘Notes on the evolution of the Burmese phonological system’. Medieval Tibeto-Burman languages II. Beckwith, Christopher I. (ed.), Leiden: Brill, 103–20.Google Scholar

Yanson, Rudolf (2015). ‘Predictability of phonological changes in Burmese’. Archiv Orientální 83.1: 95–115.Google Scholar

Zeisler, Bettina (2002). ‘The development of temporal coding in Tibetan: some suggestions for a functional internal reconstruction. (1): Unexpected use of the “imperative” stem in Old Tibetan and Themchen (Amdo Tibetan)’. Tibet, past and present. PIATS 2000: Tibetan studies: Proceedings of the Ninth Seminar of the International Association for Tibetan Studies. Blezer, Henk (ed.), Leiden: Brill, 441–53.Google Scholar

Zeisler, Bettina (2015). ‘གནམ་གྱི་ཁྲི་བདུན་ The Seven Stars of Heaven: a gift for a reconvalescent’. Tibetan and Himalayan healing. An anthology for Anthony Aris. Ramble, Ch. and Roesler, U. (eds.), Kathmandu: Vajra Books, 747–54.Google Scholar

Shangfang, Zhengzhang 鄭張尚芳 (1987). ‘古韻母系統和四等、介音、聲調的發源問題 guyunmu xitong he sideng, jieyin, shengdiao de fayuan wenti’ (The old rhyme system and questions on the origin of division-iv, medial and tone). 溫州師范學院學報 Wenzhou shifan xueyuan xuebao/Journal of Wenzhou Normal College 1987.4: 67–90.Google Scholar

Shangfang, Zhengzhang 鄭張尚芳 (2000). The phonological system of Old Chinese. Sagart, Laurent, trans., Paris: École des hautes études en science sociales, Centre de recherches linguistiques sur l’Asie orientale.Google Scholar

Zumo, Zhou 周祖謨 (1983). 唐五代韻書集存 Tang wudai yunshu jicun. (Collected rime books of the Tang and Five Dynasties). Beijing: 中華書局 Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar