Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T16:46:36.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - The Constitutional Treaty Crisis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2017

Mai'a K. Davis Cross
Affiliation:
Northeastern University, Boston
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Christopher. 2004. “MacShane Urges ‘more Ministers for Europe.’” Financial Times, London first edition, November 17.Google Scholar
Arnold, Martin, Hollinger, Peggy, and Thornhill, John. 2005. “High Turnout Reflects Deeply Divided Electorate in France.” Financial Times, London second edition, May 30.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard. 2005. “Charter for the European Union Meets Resistance.” International Herald Tribune, New York, May 22.Google Scholar
Bickerton, Ian. 2005a. “Dutch Find 20 Reasons to Reject EU Treaty.” Financial Times, London first edition, June 2.Google Scholar
Bickerton, Ian. 2005b. “Dutch to Launch Yes Vote Offensive.” Financial Times, London first edition, April 19.Google Scholar
Bickerton, Ian. 2005c. “Fears Grow That Dutch Voters Will Turn Down EU Treaty Referendum on Constitution.” Financial Times, London first edition, April 12.Google Scholar
Blanke, Hermann-Josef and Mangiameli, Steilo. 2012. The European Union after Lisbon: Constitutional Basis, Economic Order and External Action. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Búrca, Gráinne. 2006. “The European Constitution Project after the Referenda,” Constellations 13(2): 206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buttiglione, Rocco. 2004. “EU Vote Is an Attack on Berlusconi, Says Italy.” Financial Times, London first edition, October 13.Google Scholar
Carbone, Maurizio. 2009. “From Paris to Dublin: Domestic Politics and the Treaty of Lisbon,” Journal of Contemporary European Research 5(1): 4360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, Thomas. 2005. “The EU Reform Process: From the European Constitution to the Lisbon Treaty.” In National Politics and European Integration: From the Constitution to the Lisbon Treaty, edited by Carbone, Maurizio. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp. 1633.Google Scholar
Craig, Paul. 2010. The Lisbon Treaty: Law, Politics, and Treaty Reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crum, Ben. 2012. Learning from the EU Constitutional Treaty: Democratic Constitutionalization beyond the Nation-State. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crum, Ben. 2006. “Party Stances in the Referendums on the EU Constitution: Causes and Consequences of Competition and Collusion,” European Union Politics 8(1): 63.Google Scholar
Crum, Ben. 2008. The EU Constitutional Process: A Failure of Political Representation?. RECON Online Working Paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Atena, Antonio. 2012. “The European Constitution’s Prospects.” In The European Union after Lisbon: Constitutional Basis, Economic Order and External Action, edited by Blanke, Hermann-Josef and Mangiameli, Stelio. Heidelberg: New York, pp. 379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehousse, Renaud. 2006. “The Unmaking of a Constitution: Lessons from the European Referenda,” Constellations 13(2): 151164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, Andrew. 2005. The Struggle for Europe’s Constitution. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
The Economist. 2005. “A Tale of Two Couples.” June 2.Google Scholar
The Economist. 2005. “Books and Arts: An Optimist’s View; The European Union.” February 26.Google Scholar
The Economist. 2005. “Europe: Putting the Clog In.” May 21.Google Scholar
The Economist. 2005. “Europe: The Great Unraveling.” April 23.Google Scholar
The Economist. 2005. “Europe: The Triumph of Perfidious Albion.” June 2.Google Scholar
The Economist. 2005. “Europe: Vote Early, Vote Often; The European Union Constitution.” February 26.Google Scholar
The Economist. 2005. “France and the EU: A Severe Crisis D’identité.” May 26.Google Scholar
The Economist. 2005. “It’s Chirac, Stupid.” June 2.Google Scholar
The Economist. 2005. “Leaders: Outlook: Gloomy; The European Union.” April 2.Google Scholar
The Economist. 2005. “Survey: Meet the Neighbours.” June 25.Google Scholar
The Economist. 2005. “The Europe That Died: And the One That Should Live On.” June 2.Google Scholar
Elliot, Michael. 2005. “The Decline and Fall of Rome.” Time, June 5.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard. 2004. “The Dangers of a Contradictory Constitution.” Financial Times, London first edition, October 11.Google Scholar
Eriksen, Erik O. and Fossum, John Erik. 2000. Democracy in the European Union – Integration through Deliberation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2005. The Future Constitutional Treaty: First Result. Report.Google Scholar
Financial Times. 2005. “After the Votes,” London third edition. June 3.Google Scholar
Financial Times. 2005. “Chirac Does Battle for the Constitution,” London first edition. April 12.Google Scholar
Financial Times. 2005. “Danes Set Date for EU Constitution Vote: September Referendum,” London first edition. March 1.Google Scholar
Financial Times. 2005. “Dutch Premier Hits at Treaty Opponents,” London first edition. April 29.Google Scholar
Financial Times. 2005. “France’s Fears.” April 18.Google Scholar
Financial Times. 2004. “Straw Warns on Rejection of EU Constitution Treaty,” London third edition. December 8.Google Scholar
Fischer, Joschka. 2000. “From Confederacy to Federation – Thoughts on the Finality of European Integration.” Speech, Humboldt University, Berlin, May 12.Google Scholar
Flash Eurobarometer 171. 2005. “The European Constitution Post-referendum Survey in France.” May 30–31, Publication June.Google Scholar
Flash Eurobarometer 172. 2005. “The European Constitution: Post-referendum Survey in The Netherlands.” June 2–4, Publication June.Google Scholar
Fossum, John E. and Menéndez, Agustín José. 2011. “From Laeken to Lisbon: Moving Beyond Synthesis or Heightened Constitutional Ambiguity?” In The Constitution’s Gift: A Constitutional Theory for a Democratic European Union. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fossum, John E. and Menéndez, Agustín José. 2011. The Constitution’s Gift: A Constitutional Theory for a Democratic European Union. Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fossum, John E. and Menéndez, Agustín José. 2005. “The Constitution’s Gift: A Deliberative Democratic Analysis of Constitution Making in the European Union,” European Law Journal 11(4): 380440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamble, Andrew. 2006. “The European Disunion,” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 8: 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glencross, Andrew and Treschsel, Alexander. 2011. “First or Second Order Referendums? Understanding the Votes on the EU Constitutional Treaty in Four EU Member States,” West European Politics 34(4): 755772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gloom, Brian. 2004. “Kohl Voices Fears over Turkey EU Entry.” Financial Times, London third edition, November 22.Google Scholar
Grant, Charles. 2005. “What Happens if Britain Votes No?” Center for European Reform, March.Google Scholar
Hobolt, Sara B., and Brouard, Sylvain. 2011. “Contesting the European Union? Why the Dutch and the French Rejected the European Constitution,” Political Research Quarterly 6(2): 309322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollinger, Peggy and Thornhill, John. 2005. “Chirac’s Record on Europe Hampers Yes Campaign.” Financial Times, London first edition, April 15.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet and Marks, Gary. 2009. “A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus,” British Journal of Political Science 39(1): 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howorth, Jolyon. 2007. Security and Defence Policy in the European Union. Houndmills: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Herald Tribune. 2005. “Fear and Rejection,” June 2.Google Scholar
Ivaldi, Gilles. 2006. “Beyond France’s 2005 Referendum on the European Constitutional Treaty: Second-order Model, Anti-establishment Attitudes and the End of the Alternative European Utopia,” West European Politics 29(1): 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jabko, Nicolas. 2007. “The Constitution as a Repertoire: The Power and Limits of Symbolic Politics.” Paper, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada, May 22.Google Scholar
Jones, Adam. 2005. “Polls Give Ray of Hope to French Yes Campaigners.” Financial Times, London first edition, May 2.Google Scholar
Klingst, Martin. 2005. “Wer Auf Das Volk Nicht Hört.” Die Zeit, June 2. Translated by Krasnodebska, Molly.Google Scholar
Le Figaro. 2005. “Opinion Poll,” May 10.Google Scholar
Legrain, Philippe. 2005. “French Myth-making.” Prospect, July.Google Scholar
Lu, Chien-Yi. 2008. “Constitution-making and the Search for a European Public Sphere.” In The Rise and Fall of the EU’s Constitutional Treaty, edited by Laursen, Finn. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 431452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubbers, Marcel. 2008. “Regarding the Dutch ‘Nee’ to the European Constitution: A Test of the Identity, Utilitarian, and Political Approaches to Voting ‘No,’European Union Politics 9(1): 5986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclay, Michael. 2005. “Hints for the Elite.” Prospect, July.Google Scholar
Mazzucelli, Colette. 2008. “The French Rejection of the Constitutional Treaty.” In The Rise and Fall of the EU’s Constitutional Treaty, edited by Laursen, Finn. Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publications, pp. 161180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minder, Raphael. 2005. “MEPs Hit ‘pause’ Button on Out-of-tune Treaty.” Financial Times, London second edition, June 9.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 2005. “Europe without Illusions: A Category Error.” Prospect, July.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 2006. “What Can We Learn from the Collapse of the European Constitutional Project?Politische Vierteljahresschrift 47(2): 219241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munchau, Wolfgang. 2004. “An a La Carte Europe Is Likely to Split.” Financial Times, London first edition, October 4.Google Scholar
Munchau, Wolfgang. 2005. “France’s Electorate Could End European Integration.” Financial Times, London first edition, April 11.Google Scholar
Nielson, Ramous L. 2008. “Everything Shall Now Be Popular: Explaining Elite Behaviour in the Constitutional Treaty Referenda.” In The Rise and Fall of the EU’s Constitutional Treaty, edited by Laursen, Finn. Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 453477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paris-Dobozy, Marie-L. 2008. “The Implications of the ‘No’ Vote in France: Making the Most of a Wasted Opportunity.” In The Rise and Fall of the EU’s Constitutional Treaty, edited by Laursen, Finn. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 497523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, George. 2005a. “Budget Deadlock Fears Deepen Crisis Mood.” Financial Times, London first edition, June 16.Google Scholar
Parker, George. 2005b. “Leader on a Mission to Resuscitate EU Dream.” Financial Times, London first edition, June 6.Google Scholar
Parker, George, and Buck, Tobias. 2005. “Brussels Fears Growing French Euroscepticism.” Financial Times, London first edition, March 18.Google Scholar
Parker, George and Dombey, Daniel. 2005. “EU Dreams Collide with French Antipathy, Brussels Reaction.” Financial Times, London second edition, May 30.Google Scholar
Peel, Quentin. 2005a. “Britain Has Obligations to Europe.” Financial Times, London second edition, May 5.Google Scholar
Peel, Quentin. 2005b. “France Cannot Have the Last Word.” Financial Times, London first edition, May 26.Google Scholar
Peel, Quentin. 2005c. “The World Has a Distorted View of Europe.” Financial Times, London first edition, January 27.Google Scholar
Phinnemore, David. 2013. The Treaty of Lisbon: Origins and Negotiation. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Přibáň, Jiří. 2011. “Desiring a Democratic European Polity: The European Union Between the Constitutional Failure and the Lisbon Treaty.” In The European Union after Lisbon: Constitutional Basis, Economic Order, and External Action, edited by Blanke, Hermann-Josef and Mangiameli, Steilo. Berlin: Springer, pp. 7192.Google Scholar
Pusca, Anca M. 2009. Rejecting the EU Constitution?: From the Constitutional Treaty to the Treaty of Lisbon. New York: IDEBATE Press.Google Scholar
Qvortrup, Matt. 2006. “The Three Referendums on the European Constitution Treaty in 2005,” The Political Quarterly 77(1): 8997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2010. A Community of Europeans?: Transnational Identities and Public Spheres. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2000. “‘Let’s Argue!’ Communicative Action in World Politics,” International Organization 54(1): 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Vivien A. 2006. Democracy in Europe: The EU and National Polities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmit, Helmut. 2005. “Wir Brauchen Mut.” Die Zeit, June 9.Google Scholar
Sciolino, Elaine. 2005. “French Voters Soundly Reject European Union Constitution.” International Herald Tribune, New York, May 31.Google Scholar
Siedentop, Larry. 2005. “A Crisis of Legitimacy.” Prospect, July.Google Scholar
Standard Eurobarometer 61, Spring. 2004. “Public Opinion in the European Union.” Fieldwork February–March 2004. Published July 2004.Google Scholar
Standard Eurobarometer 62, Autumn. 2004. “Public Opinion in the European Union.” Fieldwork October–November 2004. Published December 2004.Google Scholar
Standard Eurobarometer 63, Spring. 2005. “Public Opinion in the European Union.” Fieldwork May–June 2005. Published July 2005.Google Scholar
Standard Eurobarometer 64, Autumn. 2005. “Public Opinion in the European Union.” Fieldwork October–November 2005. Published December 2005.Google Scholar
Standard Eurobarometer 67, Spring. 2006. “Public Opinion in the European Union.” Fieldwork May–June 2006. Published July 2006.Google Scholar
Statham, Paul, and Trenz, Hans-Jörg. 2013. The Politicization of Europe: Contesting the Constitution in the Mass Media. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stephens, Philip. 2005a. “Europe Cannot Afford to Retreat From the World.” Financial, London first edition, June 10.Google Scholar
Stephens, Philip. 2004. “Europe Must Open Its Eyes and Look to the Future.” Financial Times, London third edition, December 11.Google Scholar
Stephens, Philip. 2005b. “France Begins to Question the Rationale for Europe.” Financial Times, London first edition, March 18.Google Scholar
Sutton, Alastair. 2005. “Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe: Impact of Negative Votes in the French and Dutch Referenda.” White paper, White & Case.Google Scholar
Thornhill, John. 2004. “French Socialists Fight to Sway EU Future.” Financial Times, London first edition, November 12.Google Scholar
Thornhill, John. 2005a. “Corruption Trial Deals Blow to Chirac Campaign.” Financial Times, London second edition, March 22.Google Scholar
Thornhill, John. 2005b. “Draft Law Row Could Hit French Treaty Vote.” Financial Times, London first edition, January 27.Google Scholar
Thornhill, John. 2005c. “France Grapples with Ghosts over the Referendum Vote.” Financial Times, London first edition, April 30.Google Scholar
Thornhill, John. 2005d. “French No Campaigners Say Love for Europe Is Their Principal Driving Force.” Financial Times, London third edition, April 15.Google Scholar
Thornhill, John. 2005e. “French No Would Lead to Fall of Europe, Says Prodi.” Financial Times, London first edition, April 25.Google Scholar
Thornhill, John. 2005f. “Many Voters in Next Month’s Referendum Are Disenchanted with Their Leaders.” Financial Times, London first edition, April 6.Google Scholar
Thornhill, John. 2005g. “Rejection of Treaty Would Cause Break Down, Chirac Warns.” Financial Times, London second edition, May 27.Google Scholar
Thornhill, John. 2005h. “The Yes Camp Looks Frailer than in 1992.” Financial Times, London first edition, May 26.Google Scholar
Thornhill, John, and Parker, George. 2005. “An Unhappy Union.” Financial Times, London first edition, April 27.Google Scholar
Time. 2004. “A Party Divided.” November 28.Google Scholar
Time. 2005. “Winner Takes All.” February 27.Google Scholar
Trenz, Hans-J. and Eder, Klaus. 2004. “The Democratizing Dynamics of a European Public Sphere,” European Journal of Social Theory 7(1): 525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vassallo, Francesca. 2008. “The Failed EU Constitution Referendums: The French Case in Perspective, 1992–2005.” In The Rise and Fall of the EU’s Constitutional Treaty, edited by Laursen, Finn. Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 411430.Google Scholar
Vetters, Regina. 2009. “Just Another Missed Opportunity in the Development of a European Public Sphere: The European Constitutional Debate in German, British, and French Broadsheets.” In Media, Democracy, and European Culture, edited by Bondebjerg, Ib and Madsen, Peter. Bristol, UK: Intellect, pp. 157176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, Joseph. 1999. The Constitution for Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, Martin. 2005. “The Crushing Reality of Making the Eurozone Work.” Financial Times, London first edition, June 8.Google Scholar
Wolinetz, Steven B. 2008. “Trimming the Sails: The Dutch and the EU Constitution after the Referendum.” In The Rise and Fall of the EU’s Constitutional Treaty, edited by Laursen, Finn. Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 181200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zowislo-Grünewald, Natascha. 2008. “On Europe’s Representation: A Symbolic Interpretation of Rejecting the Constitution.” PS: Political Science & Politics 41(30): 551555.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×