Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T23:25:21.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Our Geological Contemporary

from Part I - Histories of the Legal Contemporary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 December 2017

By
Alain Pottage
Edited by
Justin Desautels-Stein  and
Christopher Tomlins
Justin Desautels-Stein
Affiliation:
University of Colorado School of Law
Christopher Tomlins
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley School of Law
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought , pp. 177 - 196
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited – Chapter 9

Aubry, Marie-Pierre 2007. “Chronostratigraphic terminology: building on principles,” Stratigraphy 4: 117–25.Google Scholar
Autin, Whitney J. and Holbrook, John M. 2012. “Is the Anthropocene an issue of stratigraphy or pop culture?” GSA Today 22: 60–1.Google Scholar
Bonneuil, Christophe and Fressoz, Jean-Baptiste 2013. L'Evénement Anthropocène. La Terre, l'Histoire et Nous. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, Dipesh 2009. “The climate of history: four theses,” Critical Inquiry 35: 197–222.Google Scholar
Cockell, Charles, Koebel, Christian, and Gilmour, Iain (eds.) 2006. Biological Processes Associated with Impact Events New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Crutzen, Paul J. and Birks, John W. 1982. “The atmosphere after a nuclear war: twilight at noon,” Ambio, 11: 114-25.Google Scholar
Crutzen, Paul 1995. “My Life With O3, NOx And Other YZOxs.” Available at: https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/1995/crutzen-lecture.pdfGoogle Scholar
Crutzen, Paul J. and Steffen, Will 2003. “How long have we been in the Anthropocene era?” Climate Change 61: 251–57.Google Scholar
Crutzen, Paul J. and Stoermer, Eugene F. 2000. “The Anthropocene,” IGBP Global Change Newsletter 41: 17–18.Google Scholar
Edwards, Paul N. 2010. A Vast Machine. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich 2010. Second-order observation historicized – an epistemological frame narrative. Available at: http://www.design-in-human.de/lectures/gumbrecht.htmlGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Clive 2010. Requiem for a Species. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Clive 2014. “Ecologists butt out. You are not entitled to redefine the Anthropocene.” Available at: http://clivehamilton.com/ecologists-butt-out-you-are-not-entitled-to-redefine-the-anthropocene/Google Scholar
Hamilton, Clive 2015a. “Getting the Anthropocene so wrong,” The Anthropocene Review 2: 102–7.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Clive 2015b. “Human destiny in the Anthropocene,” in Hamilton, , Gemenne, , and Bonneuil, (eds.), pp. 32–43.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Clive and Grinevald, Jacques 2015. “Was the Anthropocene anticipated?” The Anthropocene Review 2: 59–72.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Clive, Gemenne, François, and Bonneuil, Christophe (eds.) 2015. The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis: Rethinking Modernity in a New Epoch. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hüppauf, Bernd (ed.) 1997. War, Violence, and the Modern Condition, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart 2004. Futures Past. On the Semantics of Historical Time. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kotzé, Louis J. 2014. “Human rights and the environment in the Anthropocene,” The Anthropocene Review 1: 252–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno 2010. “An attempt at a compositionist manifesto,” New Literary History, 41: 471–90.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno 2013. An Inquiry Into Modes of Existence. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno 2014. Agency in the time of the Anthropocene. New Literary History. 45: 1–18.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno 2015a. Face à Gaia. Huit Conférences sur le Nouveau Régime Climatique. Paris: La Découverte.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno 2015b. “Telling friend from foe in the Anthropocene,” in Hamilton, , Gemmene, , and Bonneuil, (eds.), 145–75.Google Scholar
Lewis, Simon and Maslin, Mark 2015. “Defining the Anthropocene,” Nature 519: 171–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luhmann, Niklas 2000. The Reality of the Mass Media. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas 2012. Theory of Society, volume 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas 2013. Theory of Society, volume 2. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas 2015. Modern Society Shocked by its Risks. Berlin: AGIL.Google Scholar
Malm, Andreas and Hornborg, Alf 2014. “The geology of mankind?” The Anthropocene Review 1: 62–9.Google Scholar
McMahon, Darrin M. and Moyn, Samuel (eds.) 2014. Rethinking Modern European Intellectual History. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werner 2014. “On conceptual history,” in McMahon, and Moyn, (eds.), pp. 74–93.Google Scholar
Ocampo, Adriana, Vajda, Vivi and Buffeteaut, Eric 2006. “Unravelling the Cretaceous-Paleogene (KT) turnover, evidence from flora, fauna and geology,” in Cockell, , Koebel, , and Gilmour, (eds.), pp. 197–219.Google Scholar
Pankakoski, Timo 2010. “Conflict, context, concreteness: Koselleck and Schmitt on concepts,” Political History 38: 749–99.Google Scholar
Parikka, Jussi 2015. A Geology of Media. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Rajchman, John 1998. Constructions. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ruddiman, William F. 2003. “The anthropogenic greenhouse era began thousands of years ago,” Climatic Change 61: 261–93.Google Scholar
Ruddiman, William F. and Thomson, Jonathan S. 2001. “The case for human causes of increased atmospheric CH4 over the last 5000 years,” Quaternary Science Reviews, 20: 1769–77.Google Scholar
Ruddiman, William F., John, E. Kutzbach and Steve, J. Vavrus 2011. “Can natural or anthropogenic explanations of late-Holocene CO2 and CH4 increases be falsified?” The Holocene, 21: 865–87.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl 1996. The Concept of the Political. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl 2003. The Nomos of the Earth. New York: Telos Press.Google Scholar
Steffen, Will, Crutzen, Paul J. and McNeill, John R. 2007. “The Anthropocene: are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature?” Ambio 36: 614–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steffen, Will et al. 2011. “The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 369: 842–67.Google Scholar
Turco, Richard P, Toon, Owen Brian, Ackerman, Thomas P, Pollack, James B. and Sagan, Carl 1983. “Nuclear winter. Global consequences of multiple nuclear explosions,” Science, 222: 1283–93.Google Scholar
Vidas, Davor. 2011. “The Anthropocene and the international law of the sea,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 369: 909–25.Google Scholar
Vismann, Cornelia. 1997. “Starting from scratch,” in Hüppauf, (ed.) pp. 45–67.Google Scholar
Voosen, Paul 2012. “Geologists drive golden spike toward Anthropocene's base,” Greenwire, Monday, September 17, 2012. Available at http://www.eenews.net/stories/1059970036Google Scholar
Zalasiewicz, Jan et al. 2004. “Simplifying the stratigraphy of time,” Geology 32: 1–4.Google Scholar
Zalasiewicz, Jan et al. 2010 “The new world of the Anthropocene,” Environmental Science and Technology 44: 2228–31.Google ScholarPubMed
Zalasiewicz, Jan et al. 2014. “When did the Anthropocene begin? A mid-twentieth century boundary level is stratigraphically optimal,” Quatenary International 383: 196–203.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×