Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T19:00:25.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

23 - ADR and Some Thoughts on “the Social” in Contemporary Legal Thought

from Part III - Structures of the Legal Contemporary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 December 2017

By
Amy J. Cohen
Edited by
Justin Desautels-Stein  and
Christopher Tomlins
Justin Desautels-Stein
Affiliation:
University of Colorado School of Law
Christopher Tomlins
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley School of Law
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought , pp. 454 - 464
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited – Chapter 23

Abel, Richard L. 1976a. “Introduction,” in Abel, (ed.), pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
Abel, Richard L. (ed.) 1976b. The Politics of Informal Justice: The American Experience. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Addresses Delivered at the National Conference on the Causes of Popular Dissatisfaction with the Administration of Justice 1976. Federal Rules Decisions 70: 79–246.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Jerold S. 1983. Justice without Law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Amy J. 2009. “Revisiting against settlement: some reflections on dispute resolution and public values,” Fordham Law Review 78: 1143–70.Google Scholar
Cohen, Amy J. 2010. “Governance legalism: Hayek and Sabel on reason and rules, organization and law,” Wisconsin Law Review 2010: 357–87.Google Scholar
Cohen, Amy J. 2011. “The family, the market, and ADR,” Journal of Dispute Resolution 2011: 91–126.Google Scholar
Coleman, James S. 1988. “Social capital in the creation of human capital,” American Journal of Sociology 94: S95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin and Kennedy, Duncan 2015. “Foreword: theorizing contemporary legal thought,” Law and Contemporary Problems 78: i–x.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin and Christopher, Tomlins (eds.) 2017. Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dorf, Michael C. and Sabel, Charles F. 1998. “A constitution of democratic experimentalism,” Columbia Law Review 98: 267–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkin, Mayer 1982. “Divorce mediation: an alternative process for helping families to close the book gently,” Family Court Review 20: iii–vi.Google Scholar
Fine, Ben 2001. Social Capital versus Social Theory: Political Economy and Social Science at the Turn of the Millennium. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fiss, Owen M. 1979. “Foreword: the forms of justice,” Harvard Law Review 93: 1–59.Google Scholar
Fiss, Owen M. 1982. “The social and political foundations of adjudication,” Law and Human Behavior 6: 121–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiss, Owen M. 1984. “Against settlement,” Yale Law Journal 93: 1073–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis 1995. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. 1970. “Mediation – its forms and functions,” Southern California Law Review 44: 305–39.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. 1978. “The forms and limits of adjudication,” Harvard Law Review 92: 353–409.Google Scholar
Harrington, Christine B. 1985. Shadow Justice: The Ideology and Institutionalization of Alternatives to Court. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1948. Individualism and Economic Order. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1973. Law, Legislation and Liberty, Volume 1: Rules and Order. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1976. Law, Legislation and Liberty, Volume 2: The Mirage of Social Justice. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hofrichter, Richard 1982. “Neighborhood justice and the social control problems of American capitalism: a perspective,” in Abel, (ed.) pp. 207–48.Google Scholar
Hofrichter, Richard 1987. Neighborhood Justice in Capitalist Society: The Expansion of the Informal State. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 2006. “Three globalizations of law and legal thought: 1850–2000,” in Trubek, and Santos, (eds.), pp. 19–73.Google Scholar
Kolb, Deborah M. (ed.) 1994. When Talk Works: Profiles of Mediators (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Kramer, Larry D. 2004. “Popular constitutionalism, circa 2004,” California Law Review 92: 959–1011.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Jethro K. and Henry, James F. 1986. “Lessons from the alternative dispute resolution movement,” University of Chicago Law Review 53: 424–39.Google Scholar
McThenia, Andrew W., and Shaffer, Thomas L. 1985. “For reconciliation,” Yale Law Journal 94: 1660–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie 1995a. “The many ways of mediation: the transformations of traditions, ideologies, paradigms and practices,” Negotiation Journal 11: 217–42.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie. 1995b. “Whose dispute is it anyway? A philosophical and democratic defense of settlement (in some cases),” Georgetown Law Journal 83: 2663–96.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle 1994. “Albie M. Davis: community mediation as community organizing,” in Kolb, (ed.), pp. 245–78.Google Scholar
Mnookin, Robert H. 1975. “Child-custody adjudication: judicial functions in the face of indeterminacy,” Law and Contemporary Problems 39: 226–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mnookin, Robert H. 1985. “Divorce bargaining: the limits on private ordering,” University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 18: 1015–37.Google Scholar
Mnookin, Robert H. and Kornhauser, Lewis 1979. “Bargaining in the shadow of the law: the case of divorce,” Yale Law Journal 88: 950–97.Google Scholar
Muehlebach, Andrea K. 2012. The Moral Neoliberal: Welfare and Citizenship in Italy. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pahuja, Sundhya 2004. “This is the world: have faith,” European Journal of International Law 15: 381–93.Google Scholar
Patton, Leah K. 1984. “Settling environmental disputes: the experience with and future of environmental mediation,” Environmental Law 14: 547–54.Google Scholar
Phillips, Barbara A. and Piazza, Anthony C. 1983. “The role of mediation in public interest disputes,” Hastings Law Journal 34: 1231–44.Google Scholar
Piore, Michael J. and Sabel, Charles F. 1984. The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pound, Roscoe 1911. “The scope and purpose of sociological jurisprudence,” Harvard Law Review 25: 140–68.Google Scholar
Pound, Roscoe 1912. “Social problems and the courts,” The American Journal of Sociology 18: 331–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riles, Annnelise 2015. ”From comparison to collaboration: experiments with a new scholarly and political form,” Law and Contemporary Problems 78: 147–83.Google Scholar
Rittich, Kerry 2006. “The future of law and development: second-generation reforms and the incorporation of the social,” in Trubek, and Santos, (eds.), pp. 203–52.Google Scholar
Rose, Nikolas 2000. “Community, citizenship, and the third way,” American Behavioral Scientist 43: 1395–411.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles and William, H. Simon 2017. “Democratic experimentalism,” in Desautels-Stein and Tomlins (eds.), pp. 477–98.Google Scholar
Sander, Frank E. A. and Goldberg, Stephen B. 1994. “Fitting the forum to the fuss: a user-friendly guide to selecting an ADR procedure,” Negotiation Journal 10: 49–68.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin 1987. “The ‘new formalism’ in disputing and dispute processing,” Law and Society Review 21: 695–715.Google Scholar
Shamir, Ronen (2008). “Corporate social responsibility: towards a new market-embedded morality?” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 9: 371–94.Google Scholar
Simon, William H. 1985. “Legal informality and redistributive politics,” Clearinghouse Review 19: 384–91.Google Scholar
Susskind, Lawrence and Cruikshank, Jeffrey L. 1987. Breaking the Impasse: Consensual Approaches to Resolving Public Disputes. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Trubek, David M. and Santos, Alvaro (eds.) 2006. The New Law and Economic Development: A Critical Appraisal. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ury, William L., Brett, Jeanne M., and Goldberg, Stephen B. 1988. Getting Disputes Resolved: Designing Systems to Cut the Costs of Conflict. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×