Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T07:58:06.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II - Application

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2016

Yun-chien Chang
Affiliation:
Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
Wei Shen
Affiliation:
Shandong University, People's Republic of China
Wen-yeu Wang
Affiliation:
National Taiwan University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Private Law in China and Taiwan
Legal and Economic Analyses
, pp. 61 - 303
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References in English

Ayres, Ian, and Gertner, Robert. 1989. Filling Gaps in Incomplete Contracts: An Economic Theory of Default Rules. Yale Law Journal 99:87130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardhan, Pranab. 2005. Institutions Matter, But Which Ones? Economic Transition 13:499532.Google Scholar
Blase, Friedrich. 2000. CISG and China – An Intercontinental Exchange. Vindobona Journal of International Commercial Law and Arbitration 4(1):9598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Albert. 2011. An Introduction to the Legal System of the People's Republic of China, 4th ed. Hong Kong: LexisNexis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Donald C. 1996. Power and Politics in the Chinese Court System: The Enforcement of Civil Judgments. Columbia Journal of Asian Law 10(1):191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Donald. 2003. Economic Development and the Rights Hypothesis: The China Problem. American Journal of Comparative Law 51:89112.Google Scholar
Clarke, Donald C., Murrell, Peter, and Whiting, Susan. 2008. The Role of Law in China's Economic Development. Pp. 2627 in China's Great Economic Transformation, edited by Brandt, Loren and Rawski, Thomas G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jerome A. 2005. Time to Fix China's Arbitration. Far East Economic Review 168:3137.Google Scholar
Ding, Ding. 1999. China and CISG. Pp. 2537 in CISG and China: Theory and Practice, edited by Will, Michael R.. Faculté de droit, Universitéde Genève.Google Scholar
Dixit, Avinash K. 2004. Lawlessness and Economics: Alternative Modes of Governance. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fafchamps, Marcel. 2004. Market Institutions in Sub-Saharan Africa: Theory and Evidence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, Junwei. 2009. Towards a Social Value Convergence: A Comparative Study of Fundamental Principles of Contract Law in the EU and China. Oxford University Comparative Law Forum. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1564028.Google Scholar
Glaeser, Edward L., Porta, Rafael La, Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio, and Shleifer, Andrei. 2004. Do Institutions Cause Growth? Journal of Economic Growth 9:271303.Google Scholar
Graves, Jack. 2013. Penalty Clauses as Remedies: Exploring Comparative Approaches to Enforceability. Touro Law Review 29(3):681694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Cheryl W. 1997. Reforming Legal Systems in Developing and Transition Countries. Finance & Development 34(3):1416. Available at www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/1997/09/pdf/gray.pdf (last visited August 27, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grief, Avner. 2006. Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ham, Andrew. 1990. The Rules Against Penalties in Contract: An Economic Perspective. Melbourne University Law Review 17:649671.Google Scholar
He, Xin. 2009. Enforcing Commercial Judgments in the Pearl River Delta of China. American Journal of Comparative Law 39(2):419456.Google Scholar
He, Xin. 2011. Debt Collection in the Less Developed Regions of China: An Empirical Study from a Basic-Level Court in Shaanxi Province. China Quarterly 206:253275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, Xin, and Su, Yang. 2012. Do the “Haves” Come Out Ahead in Shanghai Courts? Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 10(1):120145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillman, Robert A. 2000. The Limits of Behavioral Decision Theory in Legal Analysis: The Case of Liquidated Damages. Cornell Law Review 85:717738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Oliver Wendell Jr. 1991. The Common Law. New York, NY: Dover Publication.Google Scholar
Hsu, Stephen. 2007. Contract Law of the People's Republic of China. Minnesota Journal of International Law 16(1):115162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Avery Wiener. 1998. Foundations of the Economic Approach to Law. New York, NY: Foundation Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kronman, Anthony T., and Posner, Richard A.. 1979. The Economics of Contract Law. Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
Lando, Henrik, and Rose, Casper. 2004. On the Enforcement of Specific Performance in Civil Law Countries. International Review of Law and Economics 24:473487.Google Scholar
Li, Ji. 2013. Does Law Matter in China? An Empirical Study of a Limited Case. George Washington International Law Review 46:119170.Google Scholar
Ling, Bing. 2002. Contract Law in China. Hong Kong, Singapore, and Malaysia: Sweet & Maxwell Asia.Google Scholar
Liu, Sida, and Halliday, Terence C.. 2009. Recursivity in Legal Change: Lawyers and Reforms of China's Criminal Procedure Law. Law & Social Inquiry 34(4):911950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Sida. 2006. Beyond Global Convergence: Conflicts of Legitimacy in a Chinese Lower Court. Law & Social Inquiry 31(1):75106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, Cheryl Xiaoming, and Wang, Jun. 2015. Judicial Local Protectionism in China: An Empirical Study of IP Cases. International Review of Law and Economics 42: 4859.Google Scholar
Lubman, Stanley B. 1999. Bird in a Cage: Legal Reform in China After Mao. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Matheson, John H. 2006. Convergence, Culture and Contract Law in China. Minnesota Journal of International Law 15(2):329382.Google Scholar
McMillan, John, and Woodruff, Christopher. 1999. Dispute Prevention Without Courts in Vietnam. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 15:637658.Google Scholar
McMillan, John, and Woodruff, Christopher. 2000. Private Order Under Dysfunctional Public Order. Michigan Law Review 98:24212458.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 1998. Creating a Legal Framework for Economic Development. World Bank Research Observer 13(1):111.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 1998. Economic Analysis of Law. 4th ed. New York, NY: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar
Rauch, James E. 2001. Business and Social Networks in International Trade. Journal of Economics Literature 39:11771203.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 2003. Introduction. Pp. 119 in In Search of Prosperity: Analytic Narratives on Economic Growth, edited by Rodrik, Dani. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1990. Development as Freedom. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shulman, Mark S., and Singh, Lachimi. 2010. China's Implementation of the UN Sales Convention through Arbitral Tribunal. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 48(2):242320.Google Scholar
Tracy, Noel, and Lever-Tracy, Constance. 2002. A New Alliance for Profit: China's Local Industries and the Chinese Diaspora. Pp. 7172 in Chinese Entrepreneurship and Asian Business Networks, edited by Menkhoff, Thomas & Gerke, Solvay. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
US–China Business Council. 2007. Administrative Licensing and Business Approvals, USCBC 2007 Member Priorities Survey Executive Summary: US Companies’ China Outlook: Continuing Optimism Tempered By Operating Challenges, Protectionist Threats. Available at www.uschina.org/public/documents/2007/10/uscbc-member-survey-2007.pdf.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. 1996. The Mechanisms of Governance. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, Mo. 2006. Chinese Contract Law: Theory and Practice. Leiden and Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar

References in Chinese

Chen, Wenhua. 2011. Transactional Customs in Statutory Interpretation: From the Perspective of the PRC Contract Law. Western Law Review 2:3136.Google Scholar
China Legal Publishing House. 2015. The PRC Contract Law. Beijing: China Legal Publishing HouseGoogle Scholar
Dong, Ansheng. 2002. Civil Law Acts. Beijing: Remin University Press.Google Scholar
Han, Shiyuan. 2011a. PRC Contract Law and CISG. Jinan Journal (Section of Philosophy and Social Sciences) 2:713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Shiyuan. 2011b. The Law of Contract. 3rd ed. Beijing: Law Press.Google Scholar
Hu, Kangsheng (ed). 2010. Explanatory Texts on PRC Contract Law. Beijing: Law Press.Google Scholar
Huang, Zhong. 2010. On Validity of Unlawful Contracts. Beijing: Law Press.Google Scholar
Liang, Huixing. 1995. Studies on Statutory Interpretation of Civil Law. Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law.Google Scholar
Liang, Huixing. 1996. Unsettled Questions in the Process of Drafting PRC Contract Law. Legal Science 2:1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, Huixing. 1999a. The Unified Contract Law: Advances and Inadequacies. China Legal Science 3:2529.Google Scholar
Liang, Huixing. 1999b. A Study of Theories, Cases and Legislation in Civil Law. Vol. 2. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Governance Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, Huixing. 1999c. Successes and Shortcomings of the Contract Law: Part I. Peking University Law Journal 6:1327.Google Scholar
Long, Xingwu. 2001. On Interpretation of Contracts and Its Future Direction. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology (Section of Social Sciences) 4:5862.Google Scholar
Luo, Xiaoqi. 2002. Studies of Commercial Customs. Contemporary Law Review 2:131141.Google Scholar
Su, Yongqin. 2005. State Commands in the Autonomy of Private Law. Beijing: China Legal Publishing House.Google Scholar
Tian, Langliang. 2013. Disputes over Contracts on Sales of Goods: Adjudicative Rules and Their Implementation in Cases. 2nd ed. Beijing: China Legal Publishing House.Google Scholar
Wang, Liming. 1999. China's Proposed Uniform Contract Code. St Mary's Law Journal 31:717.Google Scholar
Wang, Liming. 2011. Studies of Contract Law: Volume I. Beijing: China Renmin University Press.Google Scholar

References in English

Barnett, Randy E. 1992. The Sound of Silence: Default Rules and Contractual Consent. Virginia Law Review 78:821853.Google Scholar
Canaris, Claus-Wilhelm., and Grigoleit, Hans Christoph. 2010. Interpretation of Contracts. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1537169: 19.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1997. Justice in Robes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Victor P. 2014. Protecting Reliance. Columbia Law Review 114:10751081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grigoleit, Hans Christoph. 2011. Mandatory Law: Fundamental Principles. Max Planck Encyclopaedia of European Private Law, edited by Basedow, Jurgen, Hopt, Klaus J., and Zimmermann, Reinhard. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1950670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Avery W. 1999. An Economic Analysis of the Guaranty Contract, U. of Chic. L. Rev. 66:4796.Google Scholar
McMeel, Gerard, and Grigoleit, Hans Christoph. 2013. Interpretation of Contracts – Prospective European Regulation from the English and German Point of View (March 1, 2013). Pp. 341372 in The Common European Sales Law in Context – Interactions with English and German Law, edited by Dannemann, Gerhard and Vogenauer, Stefan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Alan, and Scott, Robert. 2003. Contract Theory and the Limits of Contract Law. Yale L. Rev. 113:541619.Google Scholar
UNIDROIT. 2010. Principles of International Commercial Contracts. Published by the International Institute for the Unification of Private Law (“UNIDROIT”).Google Scholar

References in Chinese

Cui, Jian-yuan. 2013. The Interwoven Relationship between Contract Interpretation and Legal Interpretation. Jilin University Journal, Social Sciences Edition 72–73.Google Scholar
Chen, Tzu-Chiang. 2010. Content and Elimination of Contract. Taipei: Sharing.Google Scholar
Hengyang Intermediate People's Court (Civil, 1), Final, No. 121 (2011).Google Scholar
Larenz, Karl. 2008. Methodenlehre der Rechtswissenschaft, translated by Ai-Er Chen. Taipei: Wunan.Google Scholar
Wang, Tez-chien. 2009. Rules of Obligations. Taipei: Self-published.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Tez-Chien. 2009. The Principles of The Law of Obligations: Basic Theories, Occurrence of Debts, Contracts and Voluntary Service. 2d ed. Taipei: Self-published.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Wen-yeu. 2015. Interpretation of Commercial Contract – Analogical Reasoning and Economic Analysis. The Taiwan Law Review 236:5, 2628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reference in German

Kötz, Hein. 2013. Dispositives Recht und ergänzende Vertragsauslegung. Juristische Schulung 53(4):289, 296.Google Scholar

References in English

Baker, Tom and Siegelman, Peter. 2014. The Law and Economics of Liability Insurance: A Theoretical and Empirical Review. Pp. 169195 in Research Handbook on the Economics of Tort, edited by Arlen, Jennifer. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, John. 1973. Toward an Economic Theory of Liability. Journal of Legal Studies 2:323350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calabresi, Guido. 1961. Some Thoughts on Risk Distribution and the Law of Torts. Yale Law Journal 70:499553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calabresi, Guido. 1970. The Costs of Accidents: A Legal and Economic Analysis. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Calabresi, Guido. 1978. Torts – The Law of the Mixed Society. Texas Law Review 56:519534.Google Scholar
Cooter, Robert and DePianto, David. 2014. Damages for Incompensable Harms. Pp. 439459 in Research Handbook on the Economics of Torts, edited by Arlen, Jennifer. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Cooter, Robert and Schäfer, Hans-Bernd. 2012. Solomon's Knot: How Law Can End the Poverty of Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cooter, Robert and Ulen, Thomas. 2012. Law and Economics. 6th ed. International Edition. Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
Damaska, Mirjan R. 1991. The Faces of Justice and State Authority: A Comparative Approach to the Legal Process. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dobbs, Dan B. 2000. The Law of Torts. St. Paul, MN: West Group.Google Scholar
Friedman, David D. 2000. Law's Order: What Economics Has to Do with Law and Why It Matters. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kornhauser, Lewis A. and Revesz, Richard L.. 1989. Sharing Damages Among Multiple Tortfeasors. Yale Law Journal 98:831884.Google Scholar
Koziol, Helmut and Zhu, Yan. 2010. Background and Key Contents of the New Chinese Tort Liability Law. Journal of European Tort Law 1:328361.Google Scholar
Landes, William M. and Posner, Richard A.. 1980. Joint and Multiple Tortfeasors: An Economic Analysis. Journal of Legal Studies 9:517555.Google Scholar
Lieberthal, Kenneth. 2004. Governing China: From Revolution Through Reform. 2nd ed. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Priest, George L. 1987. The Current Insurance Crisis and Modern Tort Law. Yale Law Journal 96:15211590.Google Scholar
Priest, George L. 1991. The Modern Expansion of Tort Liability: Its Sources, Its Effects, and Its Reform. Journal of Economic Perspectives 5:3150.Google Scholar
Viscusi, W. Kip and Aldy, Joseph E.. 2003. The Value of a Statistical Life: A Critical Review of Market Estimates Throughout the World. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 27:576.Google Scholar
Zhang, Wei. Forthcoming. Understanding the Law of Torts in China: A Political Economy Perspective. East Asia Law Review 11.Google Scholar

References in Chinese and Japanese

Civil Law Office of the Legislative Affairs Commission of the NPC Standing Committee. 2010. Qinquan Zeren Fa Lifa Beijing Yu Guandian Quanji [The Complete Collection of the Legislative Background and Opinions of the Tort Liability Law]. Beijing: Law Press.Google Scholar
Gong, Pixiang (ed.). 2012. Jiangsu Fayuan Sifa Diaoyan Chengguo Ji: 2007–2011 [A Collection of the Results of the Judicial Research and Investigation by the Courts in Jiangsu Province: 2007–2011]. Beijing: Law Press.Google Scholar
Jiang, Bixin (ed.). 2014. Daolu Jiaotong Shigu Sunhai Peichang [The Road Traffic Accident Damage Compensation]. Beijing: Law Press.Google Scholar
Shanghai Municipal Finance Bureau. 2013. Annual Audit Report on the Financial Statements of the Social Relief Fund for Road Traffic Accidents in Shanghai 2013. Available at www.czj.sh.gov.cn/zlzy/jtsgshjzjj/tzgg/201305/t20130509_141661.html (last accessed: May 6, 2014).Google Scholar
Shenzhen Municipal Government. 2014. Detailed Expenditure of the Social Relief Fund for Road Traffic Accidents in Shenzhen 2013. Available at www.stc.gov.cn/SHJZ/SHJZQK/201401/P020140120404730626014.pdf (last accessed: May 6, 2014).Google Scholar
Sun, Qixiang and Wei, Zheng. 2013. China Insurance Market Report 2013. Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Uchida, Takashi. 1997. Minppo II: Saiken Kakuron [Civil Law II: Special Provisions of “Obligations”]. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Shengming (ed.). 2010. Zhonghua Renmin Gongheguo Qinquan Zerenfa Shiyi [Explanations of the Tort Liability Law of the People's Republic of China]. Beijing: Law Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yichun Municipal Finance Bureau. 2013. Audit Report on the Social Relief Fund for Road Traffic Accidents in Yichun 2013. Available at: www.ycf.gov.cn/zwgk/czgz_11399/czjd/201304/t20130403_349830.html (last accessed: May 6, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Xinbao. 2010. Qinquan Zeren Fa [Tort Liability Law]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Renmin University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References in Chinese

Cheung, Steven N. S. 2014. Economic Explanation. Beijing, China: China CITIC Press.Google Scholar
Chien, Tze-Shiou. 2003. The Presumption of Negligence in Violating Protective Statutes: Economic Analysis and Judicial Misuse. National Chengchi Law Review 75:79121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chien, Tze-Shiou. 2008. Doctor's Malpractice Liability and the Obligation to Disclose. Cross-Strait Law Review 22:3852.Google Scholar
Chien, Tze-Shiou. 2011. The Problem of Right in rem Externality. Academia Sinica Law Journal 8:227257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chien, Tze-Shiou. 2012. For What the Protective Laws Have Been Referred in Tort Law. Court Case Times 18:2531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chien, Tze-Shiou. 2014. Negligence Rules as the Principle of Private Law. Peking University Law Review 15(1):155173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chien, Tze-Shiou. 2015a. Law as Contractual Arrangements. SJTU Law Review 2015(2):3746.Google Scholar
Chien, Tze-Shiou. 2015b. The Contractual Nature of Medical Liability. Court Case Times 39:1620.Google Scholar
Su, Yeong-chin. 2010. Freedom of Contract on Registrable Goods – Revisiting the Principle of Numerus Clausus in Property Rights from the Perspective of Chinese Civil Law on Both Sides of Taiwan Strait. Nanjing University Law Review 2010(Autumn):1644.Google Scholar
Wang, Tez-chien. 2015. Tort Law. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References in English

Ben-Shahar, Omri and Porat, Ariel. 2016. Personalizing Negligence Law. New York University Law Review 91:627688.Google Scholar
Brown, John Prather, 1973. Toward an Economic Theory of Liability. Journal of Legal Studies 2:323349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, James M. 1974. Good Economics – Bad Law. Virginia Law Review 60:483492.Google Scholar
Calabresi, Guido. 1997. Remarks: The Simple Virtues of the Cathedral. Yale Law Journal 106:22012207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calabresi, Guido and Melamed, A. Douglas. 1972. Property Rules, Liability Rules and Inalienability: One View of Cathedral. Harvard Law Review 95:10891128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chien, Tze-Shiou. 2013. The Legal Meaning of Coasean Economics. Peking University Law Journal 1:197214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, R.H. 1960. The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3:144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, R.H. 1988. The Firm, the Market and the Law. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Craswell, Richard. 2003. In That Case, What Is the Question? Economics and the Demands of Contract Theory. Yale Law Journal 112:903924.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard A. 1997. Law and Economics: Its Glorious Past and Cloudy Future. University Chicago Law Review 64:11671174.Google Scholar
Fletcher, George P. 1985. A Transaction Theory of Crime? Columbia Law Review 85:921930.Google Scholar
Geistfeld, Mark A. 2011. The Principle of Misalignment: Duty, Damages, and the Nature of Tort Liability. Yale Law Journal 121:142193.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1948. Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, Oliver W. 1881. The Common Law. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Landes, William M. and Posner, Richard A.. 1987. The Economic Structure of Tort Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Markesinis, Basil S. and Unberath, Hannes. 2002. The German Law of Torts: A Comparative Treatise. 4th ed. Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Mestmäcker, Ernst-Joachim. 2007. A Legal Theory without Law: Posner v. Hayek on Economic Analysis of Law. Tubingen, Germany: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
O'Driscoll Jr., Gerald P. and Rizzo, Mario J.. 1996. The Economics of Time and Ignorance. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Posner, Eric A. 2003. Economic Analysis of Contract Law After Three Decades: Success or Failure? Yale Law Journal 112:829880.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 2003. Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shavell, Steven. 1987. Economic Analysis of Accident Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Reinhard. 2005. The New German Law of Obligations: Historical and Comparative Perspectives. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

References in Chinese

Bai, Yang. 2015. New Type of Collectivization Is the Only Way to Realize a Well-off Society for All Farmers. Available at www.wyzxwk.com/Article/zatan/2015/07/347950.html (last visited October 1, 2015).Google Scholar
CCP Central Committee. 1984. CCP Central Committee Document No.1 of 1984. Available at http://money.163.com/10/0126/18/5TVO4HML002544P9.html (last visited July 18, 2016).Google Scholar
CCP Central Committee. 2001. CCP Central Committee Notice on Guaranteeing the Circulation of the Farmers’ Right to the Use of Contracted Rural Land. Available at http://news.xinhuanet.com/zhengfu/2002-11/05/content_618438.htm.Google Scholar
CCP Central Committee. 2008. CCP Central Committee's Decision on Several Crucial Questions about Promoting Rural Reform. Available athttp://cpc.people.com.cn/GB/64093/64094/8194418.html (last visited July 18, 2016).Google Scholar
CCP Central Committee. 2013. Decision of the CCP Central Committee on Several Crucial Questions about Comprehensively Deepening Reform. Available at http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2013-11/15/c_118164235.htm (last visited July 18, 2016).Google Scholar
Chen, Su. 1996. Propertization of Land Contract and Management Rights and the Establishment of Agricultural Land Use Rights System, Chinese Legal Studies, No. 3. Available at http://www.iolaw.org.cn/showArticle.aspx?id=150.Google Scholar
Chen, Rongwen. 2004. The Legal Nature of Ownership Retention. Available at http://article.chinalawinfo.com:81/article_print.asp?articleid=24921 (last visited October 1, 2015).Google Scholar
Chen, Shiqing. 2014. Nationalization of Rural Land Is Fundamental to Solve the Three Rural Issues. Available at www.21ccom.net/articles/economics/dongjian/20140908112762.html (last visited October 1, 2015).Google Scholar
Committee of Legal Affairs of Standing Committee of NPC. 2007. Interpretation of the PRC Property Law. Beijing: China Legal Publishing House.Google Scholar
Economic Information Daily. 2013. The Legacy of Land Nationalization Transition in Shenzhen Becomes Evident and the Complex Property Rights. Available at http://news.xinhuanet.com/house/2013-06/14/c_124853003.htm (last visited October 1, 2015).Google Scholar
Feng, Jie. 2006. Two Decades of Shenzhen Land Administration. Available at www.szpl.gov.cn/xxgk/gzdt/zwdt/200908/t20090825_46190.html (last visited October 1, 2015).Google Scholar
Hong, Bihua. 2007. The Legislative Background and Institutional Innovation of Chinese Property Law. Available at www.lawlib.com/Lw/lw_view.asp?no=8518&page=2 (last visited January 9, 2010).Google Scholar
Hong, Lefeng. 2014. Public Ownership of Farmland is the High-tension Cable in Red Line. Available at http://opinion.people.com.cn/n/2014/1204/c1003-26149221.html (last visited October 1, 2015).Google Scholar
Li, Haitao. 2013. Land Conversion Cannot Be Against Farmers’ Will or Act Above the Law. Available at http://szb.farmer.com.cn/nmrb/html/2013-05/03/nw.D110000nmrb_20130503_3-02.htm (last visited October 1, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Lingdong. 2015. Shenzhen Real Estate: Hero or Sinner of Cities? Available at http://www.21ccom.net/articles/economics/dongjian/20150806127651_all.html (last visited September 9, 2016).Google Scholar
Lin, Yuan. 2014. The Area of Farmland Conversion in China Reaches a Quarter and Land Reform Will Promote the “Separation of Three Rights.” Available at http://finance.sina.com.cn/china/20140114/011917938824.shtml (last visited October 1, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Shouying. 2015. Clarifying the Connotation of “Three Rights” of Farmland is Crucial. Available at http://china.caixin.com/2015-08-02/100835416.html (last visited October 1, 2015).Google Scholar
Ministry of Land and Resources. 2008. MLR Party Branch on Studying and Implementing the Spirit of the Third Plenary Session of the Seventeenth CCP Central Committee. Guotu Zidang Fa [2008]46, November 14.Google Scholar
NPC Website. 2003. Legislative Interpretation: The Transfer of Contractual Right of Land. Available at www.npc.gov.cn/npc/flsyywd/jingji/2003-10/28/content_323095.htm (last visited October 1, 2015).Google Scholar
Qin, Hui. 2008. At the Crossroad: Land System Reform in China. Available at www.aisixiang.com/data/21233.html (last visited October 1, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southern Weekly. 2007. Party Secretary Zheng Hong: What Happened in the Fifteen Days? Available at http://news.enorth.com.cn/system/2007/04/12/001609237_01.shtml (last visited January 9, 2010).Google Scholar
Wang, Libin. 2015. Pilot Marketization of Rural Land to Be Completed by the End of 2017, Non-pilot Areas Not to Act Without Instructions. Available at www.jfdaily.com/caijing/new/201501/t20150111_1134127.html (last visited October 1, 2015).Google Scholar
Wen, J. 2012. Regulations on Rural Collective Land Expropriation Compensation to be Issued. Available at: http://news.sohu.com/20120314/n337716782.shtml (last visited July 18, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Jinglian. 2015. The Understanding of “Separation of Three Rights” in Farmland is Still Under Controversy. Available at http://people.chinareform.org.cn/w/wjl/media/201505/t20150522_225929.htm (last visited October 1, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xinhua News. 2014a. Rural “Three Pieces of Land” Reform Direction is Clear: Farmers Who Pull Out From Homestead Might Be Compensated. Available at http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2014-12/03/c_127271189.htm (last visited October 1, 2015).Google Scholar
Xinhua News. 2014b. Several Opinions on Comprehensively Deepening Rural Reform and Accelerating the Modernization of Agriculture. Available at http://news.xinhua08.com/a/20140121/1295025_3.shtml (last visited October 1, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Baike. 2007. A Sample in a Demolition Era. Available at http://news.163.com/07/0328/08/3ALJ5BER00011SM9_2.html (last visited December 5, 2009).Google Scholar
Zhang, Hongyu. 2014. From “Separation of Two Rights” to “Separation of Three Rights.” Available at www.npc.gov.cn/npc/xinwen/rdlt/sd/2014-01/14/content_1823604.htm (last visited October 1, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References in English

Ackerman, Bruce. 1978. Private Property and the Constitution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Gregory S. 1997. Commodity & Propriety: Competing Visions of Property in American Legal Thought, 1776–1970. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Baron, Jane B. 2014. Rescuing the Bundle-of-Rights Metaphor in Property Law. University of Cincinnati Law Review 82:57101.Google Scholar
Bennett, Michael T., Mehta, Aashish, and Xu, Jintao. 2011. Incomplete Property Rights, Exposure to Markets and the Provision of Environmental Services in China. China Economic Review 22 (4):485498.Google Scholar
Blackstone, William. 1803. Blackstone's Commentaries. Philadelphia: William Young Birch and Abraham Small.Google Scholar
Buckley, Chris. 2004. China Approves Amendments On Property and Human Rights. The New York Times. Available at www.nytimes.com/2004/03/15/world/china-approves-amendments-on-property-and-human-rights.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien. 2015. The Economy of Concept and Possession. Pp. 103127 in Law and Economics of Possession, edited by Chang, Yun-chien. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien, and Smith, Henry E.. 2015. The Numerus Clausus Principle, Property Customs, and the Emergency of New Property Forms. Iowa Law Review 100(6):22752308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien, and Smith, Henry E.. 2012. An Economic Analysis of Civil Versus Common Law Property. Notre Dame Law Review 88(1):156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Donald C. 2003. Economic Development and the Rights Hypothesis: The China Problem. American Journal of Comparative Law 51:89112.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald. 1960. The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3:144.Google Scholar
Cooter, Robert, and Schäfer, Hans Bernd. 2012. Solomon's Knot: How Law Can End the Poverty of Nations. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagan, Hanoch, and Heller, Michael A.. 2001. The Liberal Commons. Yale Law Review 110:549557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demsetz, Harold. 1967. Toward a Theory of Property Rights. American Economic Review 57:347359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. 1993. Property in Land. Yale Law Journal 102:13151318.Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. 2001. The Market for Social Norms. American Law and Economics Review 3:149.Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. 2011. Two Cheers for the Bundle-of-Sticks Metaphor, Three Cheers for Merrill and Smith. Econ Journal Watch 8:215222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. 2012. The Costs of Complex Land Titles: Two Examples from China. Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference Journal 1:281302.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard. 2011. Bundle-of-Rights Theory as a Bulwark against Statist Conceptions of Private Property. Econ Journal Watch 8:223235.Google Scholar
French, Howard W. 2007. Homeowner Stares Down Wreckers, at Least for a While. Available at www.nytimes.com/2007/03/27/world/asia/27china.html?_r=0 (last visited October 1, 2015).Google Scholar
Grey, Thomas C. 1980. The Disintegration of Property. Nomos: Property XXII:6985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, Michael A. 1998. The Tragedy of the Anticommons: Property in the Transition from Marx to Markets. Harvard Law Review 111:621688.Google Scholar
Heller, Michael A. 1999. The Boundaries of Private Property. Yale Law Journal 108:11631223.Google Scholar
Heller, Michael A. 2001. The Dynamic Analytics of Property Law. Theoretical Inquiries in Law 2:7995.Google Scholar
Kung, James Kai-sing. 2002. Choice of Land Tenure in China: The Case of a County with Quasi-Private Property Rights. Economic Development and Cultural Change 50(4):793817.Google Scholar
McAdams, Richard H. 2015. The Expressive Powers of Law: Theories and Limits. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W. 1998. Property and the Right to Exclude. Nebraska Law Review 77:730755.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W., and Smith, Henry E.. 2000. Optimal Standardization in the Law of Property: The Numerus Clausus Principle. Yale Law Journal 110:170.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W., and Smith, Henry E.. 2001a. What Happened to Property in Law and Economics? Yale Law Journal 111:357398.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W., and Smith, Henry E.. 2001b. The Property/Contract Interface. Columbia Law Review 101:773790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W., and Smith, Henry E.. 2010. The Oxford Introductions to U.S. Law: Property. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nissim, Roger. 2008. Land Administration and Practice in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. and Thomas, Robert Paul. 1973. The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Palomar, Joyce. 2002. Land Tenure Security as a Market Stimulator in China Contents. Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 12:774.Google Scholar
Palomar, Joyce. 2004. Contributions Legal Scholars Can Make to Development Economics: Examples from China. William and Mary Law Review 45:10111053.Google Scholar
Penner, James E. 1995. The Bundle of Rights Picture of Property. UCLA Law Review 43(3): 711820.Google Scholar
Qiao, Shitong. 2015. Small Property, Big Government: A Focal Point Explanation. American Journal of Comparative Law 63(1):197238.Google Scholar
Qiao, Shitong. 2016. The Politics of Chinese Land: Partial Reform, Vested Interests and Small Property, Columbia Journal of Asian Law, 29(1):70113.Google Scholar
Qiao, Shitong. and Frank Upham. 2015. The Evolution of Relational Property Rights: A Case of Chinese Rural Land Reform. Iowa Law Review 100:24792506.Google Scholar
Ramzy, Austin. 2011. Revolt in China: After Protests, a Village Gets Blockaded by Local Authorities. Available at http://world.time.com/2011/12/14/revolt-in-china-after-protests-a-village-gets-blockaded-by-local-authorities/ (last visited October 1, 2015).Google Scholar
Rose, Carol M. 1998. The Several Futures of Property: Of Cyberspace and Folk Tales, Emission Trades and Ecosystems. Minnesota Law Review 83:129155.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2003. The Language of Property: Form, Context, and Audience. Stanford Law Review 55:11051160.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2012. Property as the Law of Things. Harvard Law Review 125:16911693.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2014. The Thing about Exclusion. Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference Journal 3:95123.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2015. The Persistence of System in Property Law. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 163:20552083.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 1996. Social Norms and Social Roles. Columbia Law Review 96:903968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trebilcock, Michael and Veel, Paul-Erik. 2008. Property Rights and Development: The Contingent Case for Formalization. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 30:397482.Google Scholar
Upham, Frank K. 2009. From Demsetz to Deng: Speculations on the Implications of Chinese Growth for Law and Development Theory. NYU Journal of International Law and Politics 41:551602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, Keliang, et al. 2005. Rural Land Question in China: Analysis and Recommendations Based on a Seventeen-Province Survey. NYU Journal of International Law and Politics 38:761839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References in Chinese

Chang, Wen-chen. 2013. An Empirical Study on the Reference of Foreign Laws and Precedents by Constitutional Court Interpretations: The Studying-abroad Backgrounds as the Key. Pp. 3384 in Empirical Studies of the Judicial Systems 2011, edited by Chang, Yun-chien. Taipei, Taiwan: Institutum Iurisprudentiae, Academia Sinica.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien. 2010. Is Freedom of Property Form Principle Efficient? Interpretations of Article 757 of the Taiwan Civil Code and the Underlying Theory. Technology Law Review 7:119168.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien. 2011. An Economic Analysis of the Article 826-1 of the Taiwan Civil Code: The Distinction Between Property Rights and Quasi-Property Rights. National Taiwan University Law Journal 40:12551302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien. 2013c. An Empirical Study of Co-ownership Partition Cases in Taiwan: 2008–2010. Pp. 221264 in Empirical Studies of the Judicial Systems 2011, edited by Chang, Yun-chien. Taipei, Taiwan: Institutum Iurisprudentiae, Academia Sinica.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien. 2013d. An Economic Analysis of Boundary Encroachment Law in Taiwan. Academia Sinica Law Journal 12:150201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien. 2014c. An Empirical Study of Boundary Encroachment Litigation. Academia Sinica Law Journal 14:319373.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien. 2015c. Unlawful Buildings: A Theoretical Construction of the Right of De Facto Disposal. NTPU Law Review. 95:5597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, Tsay-chuan. 2007. The Amendment of the Book of Things in the Taiwan Civil Code. Taiwan Law Review 100:1733.Google Scholar
Su, Yeong-Chin. 2012. In Search of New Civil Code. Revised edition. Beijing, China: Beijing University Press.Google Scholar
Tsai, Ming-Cheng. 2000. The Development and Prospect of the Book of Things in the Taiwan Civil Code. Pp. 45-94 in The Retrospect and Prospect of the Civil Code, Vol. 3. Taipei, Taiwan: Angle.Google Scholar
Wang, Tay-Sheng. 1997. Establishment of Taiwanese Legal History. Taipei: Taiwan: Angle.Google Scholar
Wang, Tez-chien. 2010. Property Law. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.Google Scholar

References in English

Arruñada, Benito. 2012. Institutional Foundation of Impersonal Exchange: Theory and Policy of Contractual Registries. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Arruñada, Benito, and Andonova, Veneta. 2008. Common Law and Civil Laws as Pro-Market Adaptations. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy 26:81130.Google Scholar
Ayres, Ian. 2005. Optional Law: The Structure of Legal Entitlements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bebchuk, Lucian Arye. 2001. Property Rights and Liability Rules: The Ex Ante View of the Cathedral. Michigan Law Review 100:601639.Google Scholar
Bell, Abraham, and Parchomovsky, Gideon. 2001. Givings. Yale Law Journal 111(3):547618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Richard R.W., and Schwartz, Warren F.. 2005. Legal Uncertainty, Economic Efficiency, and the Preliminary Injunction Doctrine. Stanford Law Review 58:381410.Google Scholar
Calabresi, Guido, and Melamed, A. Douglas. 1972. Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral. Harvard Law Review 85:10891128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien. 2012. Tenancy in “Anticommons”? A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Co-ownership. Journal of Legal Analysis 4:515553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien 2014a. An Economic and Comparative Analysis of Specificatio (the Accession Doctrine). European Journal of Law and Economics 39(2):225243.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien 2014b. To Tear Down or Not to Tear Down? An Empirical Study of Boundary Encroachment Cases in Taiwan. Pp. 144158 in Empirical Legal Analysis: Assessing the Performance of Legal Institutions, edited by Chang, Yun-chien. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien 2015a. The Economy of Concept and Possession. Pp. 103125 in Law and Economics of Possession, edited by Chang, Yun-chien. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien 2015b. Optional Law in Property: Theoretical Critiques. NYU Journal of Law and Liberty 9(2): 459512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien 2016. Hybrid Rule: Hidden Entitlement Protection Rule in Access to Landlocked Land Doctrine”, Tulane Law Review, 91, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien, Kong-Pin, Chen and Chang-ching, Lin 2016. Anchoring Effect in Real Litigations. Working paper.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien, Chen, Weitseng, and Wu, Ying Chieh. 2016 forthcoming. Property and Trust Law in Taiwan. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien, and Fennell, Lee Anne. 2014. Partition and Revelation. The University of Chicago Law Review 81 (1):2751.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien, and Smith, Henry E.. 2012. An Economic Analysis of Civil versus Common Law Property. Notre Dame Law Review 88 (1):155.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien, and Smith, Henry E. 2015. The Numerus Clausus Principle, Property Custom, and the Emergence of New Property Forms. Iowa Law Review 100:22752308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien, and Smith, Henry E. 2016. Structure and Style in Comparative Property Law. Pp. 131160 in Research Handbook on Comparative Law and Economics, edited by Ramello, Giovanni B. and Eisenberg, Theodore. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, Steven N.S. 2008. The Economic System of China. 2nd ed. Hong Kong: Arcadia Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demsetz, Harold. 1967. Toward a Theory of Property Rights. American Economic Review 57:347359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. 1991. Order Without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. 2012. The Costs of Complex Land Titles: Two Examples from China. Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference Journal 1:281344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Richard A. 2002. The Allocation of the Commons: Parking on Public Roads. The Journal of Legal Studies 31(S2):S515S544.Google Scholar
Fon, Vincy, Parisi, Francesco, and Depoorter, Ben. 2005. Litigation, Judicial Path-Dependence, and Legal Change. European Journal of Law and Economics 20(1):4356.Google Scholar
Garoupa, Nuno, and Ligüerre, Carlos Gómez. 2011. The Syndrome of the Efficiency of the Common Law. Boston University International Law Journal 29:287335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansmann, Henry, and Kraakman, Reinier. 2002. Property, Contract, and Verification: The Numerus Clausus Problem and the Divisibility of Rights. Journal of Legal Studies 31:S373S420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Philip C. 2001. Code, Custom, and Legal Practice in China: The Qing and the Republic Compared. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koo, Hui-wen. 2011. Property Rights, Land Prices, and Investment: A Study of the Taiwanese Land Registration System. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 167(3):515535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krier, James E. 2009. Evolutionary Theory and the Origin of Property Rights. Cornell Law Review 95:139159.Google Scholar
Landes, William M., and Posner, Richard A.. 1996. The Economics of Legal Disputes Over the Ownership of Works of Art and Other Collectibles. Pp. 177219 in Essays in the Economics of the Arts, edited by Ginsburgh, Victor and Menger, Pierre-Michel. Bruxelles: Université Librede Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Levmore, Saul. 2002. Two Stories about the Evolution of Property Rights. The Journal of Legal Studies 31(S2):S421S451.Google Scholar
Lueck, Dean, and Miceli, Thomas J.. 2007. Property Law. Pp. 183257 in Handbook of Law and Economics, edited by Polinsky, A. Mitchell and Shavell, Steven: Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Mackaay, Ejan. 2012. Goof Faith in Civil Law Systems: A Legal-Economic Analysis. Pp. 103132 in Liber amicorum Boudewijn Bouckaert. Vrank en vrij, edited by Mot, Jeff De. Bruges: Die Keure.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W. 2002. Introduction: The Demsetz Thesis and the Evolution of Property Rights. The Journal of Legal Studies 31:S331S338.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W., and Smith, Henry E.. 2000. Optimal Standardization in the Law of Property: The Numerus Clausus Principle. Yale Law Journal 110:170.Google Scholar
Niblett, Anthony, Posner, Richard A., and Shleifer, Andrei. 2010. The Evolution of a Legal Rule. The Journal of Legal Studies 39(2):325358.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 2009. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Parisi, Francesco. 2004. The Efficiency of the Common Law Hypothesis. Pp. 195198 in Encyclopedia of Public Choice, edited by Rowley, Charles K. and Schneider, Friedrich. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Ponzetto, Giacomo A. M., and Fernandez, Patricio A.. 2008. Case Law Versus Statute Law: An Evolutionary Comparison. Journal of Legal Studies 37:379430.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 1973. Economic Analysis of Law. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 2011. Economic Analysis of Law. 8th ed. New York, NY: Aspen.Google Scholar
Priest, George L. 1977. The Common Law Process and the Selection of Efficient Rules. The Journal of Legal Studies 6:6582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qiao, Shitong. 2015. Small Property, Adverse Possession, and Optional Law. Pp. 290319 in Law and Economics of Possession, edited by Chang, Yun-chien. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, Paul H. 1977. Why Is the Common Law Efficient? The Journal of Legal Studies 6 (1):5163.Google Scholar
Rubin, Paul H. 1982. Common Law and Statute Law. Journal of Legal Studies 11:205224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sitkoff, Robert H., and Schanzenbach, Max M.. 2005. Juridical Competition for Trust Funds: An Empirical Analysis of Perpetuities and Taxes. Yale Law Journal 115:356437.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2009a. Institutions and Indirectness in Intellectual Property. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 157:20832133.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2009b. Law and Economics: Realism or Democracy? Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 32: 127145.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2011. Standardization in Property Law. Pp. 148173 in Research Handbook on the Economics of Property Law, edited by Ayotte, Kenneth and Smith, Henry E.. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2013. An Economic Analysis of Law Versus Equity. Working paper.Google Scholar
Sterk, Stewart E. 2012. Strict Liability and Negligence in Property Theory. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 160:21292156.Google Scholar
Wyman, Katrina Miriam. 2005. From Fur to Fish: Reconsidering the Evolution of Private Property. New York University Law Review 80:117240.Google Scholar
Zhang, Taisu. 2011. Property Rights in Land, Agricultural Capitalism, and the Relative Decline of Pre-Industrial China. San Diego International Law Journal 13:129199.Google Scholar
Zywicki, Todd J., and Stringham, Edward Peter. 2010. Common Law and Economic Efficiency (available at http://ssrn.com/abstract_id=1673968).Google Scholar

References in English

Hansmann, Henry, and Kraakman, Reiner. 2001. The End of History for Corporate Law. Georgetown Law Review 89:439468.Google Scholar
Hart, Oliver. 1988. Incomplete Contract and Theory of the Firm. Journal of Law, Economics and Organizations 4:119139.Google Scholar
Howson, Nicholas. 2010. Corporate Law in the Shanghai People's Court. 2002–2008. Judicial Autonomy in a Contemporary Authoritarian State. East Asia Law Review 5:303442.Google Scholar
Howson, Nicholas. 2014. “Quack Corporate Governance” as Traditional Chinese Medicine – The Securities Regulation Cannibalization of China's Corporate Law and a State Regulator's Battle Against Party State Political Economic Power. Seattle University Law Review 37(2):667716.Google Scholar
Huang, Hui. 2012. Piercing Corporate Veil in China: Where Is It Now and Where Is It Heading? American Journal of Comparative Law 60:743774.Google Scholar
Lin, Liwen, and Milhaupt, Curtis. 2013. We Are the National Champions: Understanding the State Capitalism in China. Stanford Law Review 65:697759.Google Scholar
Metcalf, David, and Li, Jianwei. 2005. Chinese Unions: Nugatory or Transforming? An Alice Analysis, Center for Economic Performance Discussion Paper No. 708. London: London School of Economics and Political Science: 45.Google Scholar
Weizman, Martin, and Xu, Chenggang. 1994. Chinese Township Village Enterprises as Vaguely Defined Cooperatives. Journal of Comparative Economics 18(2):121145.Google Scholar
Xi, Chao. 2011. Piecing the Corporate Veil in China: How Did We Get There. Journal of Business Law 5:413430.Google Scholar

References in Chinese

Chen, Yuefan. 2011. Empirical Analysis of China's Piercing of the Corporate Veil Regime. (Master's thesis, Peking University Law School). (陈跃凡 : “我国公司法上刺破公司面纱制度的实证研究”, 北京大学法学院 2011 年硕士学位论文。)Google Scholar
Deng, Feng. 2013. The Role, Functions and Theoretical Origins of the Board of Directors under Chinese Law: an Empirical Study. China Legal Science 3:98108. (邓峰 : “中国法上董事会的角色、职能及思想渊源 : 实证法的考察”, 《中国法学》, 2013 年 3 期, 第 98–108 页。)Google Scholar
Ge, Weijun. 2011. On the Minimum Capital Requirement and Piercing the Corporate Veil. Journal of the Shanghai University of Finance and Economics 3:3441. (葛伟军 : “论最低资本与揭开公司面纱”, 《上海财经大学学报》, 2011 年 3 期, 第 34–41 页。)Google Scholar
Huang, Hui. 2014. Shareholder Derivative Action in China: Empirical Study and Reform Proposals. Renmin University Law Review 1:232264. (黄辉 : “股东派生诉讼制度研究”, 《人大法律评论》, 2014 年第 1 期, 第 232–264 页。)Google Scholar
Jiang, Jianxiang. 2012. Research into the Legal Regulation of State-Owned Enterprises’ Executive Compensation. Peking University Law Journal 1:117128. (蒋建湘 : “国企高管薪酬法律规制研究”, 载 《中国法学》 2012 年第 1 期, 第 117–128 页。)Google Scholar
Liu, Fengwei, Sun, Zheng, and Li, Zengquan. 2007. Government Interference, Industry Competition, and Compensation Contracts – Evidence from State-Owned Listed Corporations. Management World 9:7684. (刘凤委、孙铮、李增泉 : “政府干预、行业竞争与薪酬契约 – – 来自国有上市公司的经验证据”, 《管理世界》, 2007 年第 9 期, 第 76–84 页。)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Kaixiang. 2008. Judicial Practice of and Improvement to Legislation on Shareholders Derivative Suits: An Interpretation of Article 152 of the Company Law. China Legal Science 4 : 157166. (刘凯湘 : “股东代表诉讼的司法适用与立法完善 – – 以《公司法》第 152 条的解释为中心”, 《中国法学》, 2008 年 4 期, 第 157–166 页。)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, Peixin. 2010. An Empirical Analysis of Judicial Discretion Applied in Deciding Cases on the Duty of Care of Corporate Officers. Securities Law Review 2:185190. (罗培新 : “我国公司高管勤勉义务之司法裁量的实证分析”, 《证券法苑》, 2010 年 2 期, 第 185–190 页。)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mao, Zhizhong. 2012. The Independence and Professionalism of Independent Directors and Corporate Financial Irregularities. Journal of the Anhui University of Science and Technology 26(6):106111. (毛志忠 : “独立董事的独立性、履职能力与公司财务舞弊”, 载《安徽科技学院学报》 2012 年第 26 卷第 6 期, 第 106–111 页。)Google Scholar
Ren, Zili. 2008. Study of the Criteria for Duty of Care of Company's Directors. China Legal Science 6:8391. (任自力 : “公司董事勤勉义务探析”, 《中国法学》, 2008 年第 6 期, 第 83–91 页。)Google Scholar
Sun, Zheng, Liu, Fenwei, and Li, Zengquan. 2005. Market Development, Government Interference and Corporate Debt Maturity Structure. Economic Research Journal 5:5263. (孙铮、刘凤委、李增泉, “市场化程度、政府干预与企业债务期限结构 : 来自我国上市公司的经验证据”, 《经济研究》, 2005 年第 5 期, 第 52–63 页。)Google Scholar
Zhang, Hong, and Shi, Yifeng. 2013. The Standard of Judicial Decisions on the Duty of Care of Directors of Listed Companies. Oriental Law 1:112126. (张红、石一峰 : “上市公司董事勤勉义务的司法裁判标准”, 《东方法学》, 2013 年 1 期, 第 112–126 页。)Google Scholar
Wu, Caiyu. 2015. Qualification of Defendants in Representative Shareholder Lawsuits. Western Law Review 4:1122. (吴才毓“论股东代表诉讼之被告适格”, 《西部法律评论》, 2015 年第 4 期, 第 11–22 页。)Google Scholar
Wu, Jie. 2010. An Analysis of the Effectiveness of Independent Director in Listed Companies in China (Doctoral thesis, East China Normal University). (吴洁 : “中国上市公司独立董事制度有效性分析”, 华东师范大学 2010 年博士学位论文。)Google Scholar
Gaoyan, Xu. 2011. Independence of Independent Directors, Related Party Sale and Firm Value: Evidence from China Stock Market. Journal of Audit and Economics 26(4):7784. (徐高彦 : “独立董事独立性、关联交易与公司价值 – – 基于沪深两市上市公司的经验证据”, 《审计与经济研究》, 2011 年 7 月, 第 26 卷, 第 4 期, 第 77–84 页。)Google Scholar
Xu, Xiaoping. 2011. Cash-Dividend Asset Valuation and the Effectiveness of Independent Directors. Financial Research 3:2738. (徐晓萍 : “现金-股利资产估值与独立董事有效性”, 载《财经研究》 2011 年第 3 期, 第 27–38 页。)Google Scholar

References in Chinese

Lai, In-Jaw. 1984. Retrospect and Prospect of Chinese Company Legislation. National Taiwan University Law Journal 13(2):193230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Len-Yu. 2014. Modern Corporate Law. Taipei, Taiwan: New Sharing.Google Scholar
Shao, Ching-Ping. 2009. Recent Reforms and Developments in the US Corporate Director Election Regime–From a Comparative Law Perspective. National Chung Cheng University Law Journal 26:162.Google Scholar
Wang, Tay-sheng. 2015. The Process of Legal Modernization in Taiwan: From “the Extension of Mainland” to “Independent Recept-ion.” Taipei: Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica and National Taiwan University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Wen-yeu. 2008. Corporation Law. Taipei, Taiwan: Angle Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References in English

Bainbridge, , Stephen, M. 2006. The Case for Limited Shareholder Voting Rights. UCLA Law Review 53(3):601636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bebchuk, Lucian Arye, and Roe, Mark J.. 1999. A Theory of Path Dependence in Corporate Ownership and Governance. Stanford Law Review 52(1):127170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Bernard, and Kraakman, Reinier. 1996. A Self-Enforcing Model of Corporate Law. Harvard Law Review 109(8):19111982.Google Scholar
Blair, Margaret M., and Stout, Lynn A.. 1999. A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law. Virginia Law Review 85(2):247328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Ruoying. 2016. Evolution of Business Organization Law in China: More Than Meet the Eyes. In Private Law in China and Taiwan: Legal and Economic Analyses, edited by Chang, Yun-chien, Shan, Wei, and Wang, Wen-yeu. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Stephen J., and Talley, Eric L.. 2002. Playing Favorites with Shareholders. Southern California Law Review 75(2):271374.Google Scholar
Clark, Robert Charles. 1986. Corporate Law. New York: Aspen Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Dalebout, Richard S. 1989. Cumulative Voting for Corporation Directors: Majority Shareholders in the Role of a Fox Guarding a Hen House. Brigham Young University Law Review 1989(4):11991226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deffains, Bruno. 2016. Economics of Harmonization and Legal Convergence. In Private Law in China and Taiwan: Legal and Economic Analyses, edited by Chang, Yun-chien, Shan, Wei, and Wang, Wen-yeu. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterbrook, Frank H., and Fischel, Daniel R.. 1991. The Economic Structure of Corporate Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisch, Jill E. 2012. The Destructive Ambiguity of Federal Proxy Access. Emory Law Journal. 61(3):435500.Google Scholar
Glazer, Amihai, Glazer, Debra G., and Grofman, Bernard. 1984. Cumulative Voting in Corporate Elections: Introducing Strategy into the Equation. South Carolina Law Review 35(2):295309.Google Scholar
Gordon, Jeffrey N. 1994. Institutions As Relational Investors: A New Look at Cumulative Voting. Columbia Law Review 94(1):124192.Google Scholar
Gulinello, Christopher John. 2003. The Revision of Taiwan's Company Law: The Struggle toward A Shareholder-Oriented Model in One Corner of East Asia. Delaware Journal of Corporate Law 28(1):75127.Google Scholar
Hansmann, Henry, and Kraakman, Reinier, 2001. The End of History for Corporate Law. Georgia Law Journal 89(2):439468.Google Scholar
Jensen, Michael C., and Meckling, William H.. 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3(4):305360.Google Scholar
Kirby, William C. 1990. Continuity and Change in Modern China: Economic Planning on the Mainland and on Taiwan, 1943–1958. The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs 24:121141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, William C. 1995. China Unincorporated: Company Law and Business Enterprise in Twentieth-Century China. The Journal of Asian Studies 54(1):4363.Google Scholar
Klausner, Michael. 1995. Corporations, Corporate Law, and Networks of Contracts. Virginia Law Review 81(3):757852.Google Scholar
Kraakman, Reinier, Armour, John, Davies, Paul, Enriques, Luca, Hansmann, Henry B., Hertig, Gérard, Hopt, Klaus J., Kanda, Hideki, and Rock, Edward B.. 2009. The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
La Porta, Rafael, Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio, and Shleifer, Andrei. 1999. Corporate Ownership around the World. The Journal of Finance 54(2):471517.Google Scholar
La Porta, Rafael, Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio, Shleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert. 1998. Law and Finance. Journal of Political Economy 106(6):11131155.Google Scholar
Levmore, Saul. 2016. Concentrated and Distributed Law: Observations on Legal Evolution from China and Taiwan. In Private Law in China and Taiwan: Legal and Economic Analyses, edited by Chang, Yun-chien, Shan, Wei, and Wang, Wen-yeu. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lin, Yu-Hsin. 2011. Overseeing Controlling Shareholders: Do Independent Directors Constrain Tunneling in Taiwan? San Diego International Law Journal 12(2):363416.Google Scholar
Liu, Lawrence S. 2003. Global Markets and Parochial Institutions: The Transformation of Taiwan's Corporate Law System. Pp. 400434 in Global Markets, Domestic Institutions, edited by Milhaupt, Curtis J.. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Liu, Lawrence S. 2008. The Politics of Corporate Governance in Taiwan. Pp. 255277 in Transforming Corporate Governance in East Asia, edited by Kanda, Hideki, Kim, Kon-Sik, and Milhaupt, Curtis J.. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mills, Lewis R. 1968. The Mathematics of Cumulative Voting. Duke Law Journal. 1968(1):2843.Google Scholar
Romano, Roberta. 2005. The Sarbanes–Oxley Act and the Making of Quack Corporate Governance. Yale Law Journal 114(7):15211611.Google Scholar
Shao, Ching-Ping. 2014. Representative Litigations in Corporate and Securities Laws by Government-Sanctioned Nonprofit Organizations: Lessons from Taiwan. Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal 15(1):5893.Google Scholar
Striegel, June A. 1987. Cumulative Voting, Yesterday and Today: The July, 1986 Amendments to Ohio's General Corporation Law. University of Cincinnati Law Review 55(4):12651284.Google Scholar
Tsai, Chang-Hsien. 2012. Exit, Voice and International Jurisdictional Competition: A Case Study of the Evolution of Taiwan's Regulatory Regime for Outward Investment in Mainland China, 19972008. Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce 39(2):303356.Google Scholar
Wang, Wallace Wen-yeu and Chen, Jian-Lin. 2008. Reforming China's Securities Civil Actions: Lessons from PSLRA Reform in the U.S. and Government-Sanctioned Non-Profit Enforcement in Taiwan. Columbia Journal of Asian Law 21(2):115160.Google Scholar
Williams, Charles M. 1955. Cumulative Voting. Harvard Business Review. 33(3):108114.Google Scholar
Yeh, Yin-hua, Tsun-sion, Lee, and Woidtke, Tracie. 2001. Family Control and Corporate Governance. International Review of Finance 2(1/2):2148.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Application
  • Edited by Yun-chien Chang, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, Wei Shen, Shandong University, People's Republic of China, Wen-yeu Wang, National Taiwan University
  • Book: Private Law in China and Taiwan
  • Online publication: 01 December 2016
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Application
  • Edited by Yun-chien Chang, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, Wei Shen, Shandong University, People's Republic of China, Wen-yeu Wang, National Taiwan University
  • Book: Private Law in China and Taiwan
  • Online publication: 01 December 2016
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Application
  • Edited by Yun-chien Chang, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, Wei Shen, Shandong University, People's Republic of China, Wen-yeu Wang, National Taiwan University
  • Book: Private Law in China and Taiwan
  • Online publication: 01 December 2016
Available formats
×