Book contents
- Improving Homeland Security Decisions
- Improving Homeland Security Decisions
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- 1 Improving Homeland Security Decisions
- 2 Probabilistic Risk Analysis and Terrorism Risk
- 3 Integrating Stakeholder Values into Strategic Planning through Comparative Risk Analysis
- 4 Validating Terrorism Risk Assessment Models – Lessons Learned from 11 Models
- 5 Coping with Uncertainty in Adversarial Risk Analysis
- 6 A Risk and Economic Analysis of Dirty Bomb Attacks on the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach
- 7 Regional Transportation and Supply Chain Modeling for Large-Scale Emergencies
- 8 Economic Consequences of Terrorism and Natural Disasters: The Computable General Equilibrium Approach
- 9 Economic Resilience to Terrorism and Natural Hazards
- 10 The Temporal Regional Economic Impacts of a Hurricane Disaster on Oil Refinery Operations: A FlexNIEMO Approach
- 11 Risk-Informed Benefit-Cost Analysis
- 12 Enhancing Post-disaster Economic Resilience: Public-Private Partnership for Insuring Terrorism
- 13 Economic Impacts of Changes in Wait Times at U.S. Ports of Entry
- 14 Organizational Decision Processes
- 15 A Value Model for Evaluating Homeland Security Decisions
- 16 Identifying, Structuring, and Comparing the Objectives of Al Qaeda and ISIL
- 17 Multi-objective Decision Making: Expected Utility vs. Some Widely Used (and Flawed) Methods
- 18 Achieving Multiple Objectives with Limited Resources: Using Utility Theory and Control Theory
- 19 Defender-Attacker Decision Tree Analysis to Combat Terrorism
- 20 Decision Making for Bioterror Preparedness: Examples from Smallpox Vaccination Policy
- 21 Stackelberg Security Games (SSG) Basics and Application Overview
- 22 Basic Solution Concepts and Algorithms for Stackelberg Security Games
- 23 Mixed-Integer Optimization Methods for Solving Stackelberg Security Games
- 24 Methods for Addressing the Unpredictable Real-World Element in Security
- 25 Learning to Play Stackelberg Security Games
- 26 Evaluating Deployed Decision Support Systems for Security: Challenges, Analysis, and Approaches
- 27 Homeland Security Resource Allocation Games: Considering Partially Strategic Attackers and Equity
- 28 Decision Analysis by Proxy for Adaptive Adversaries
- 29 Asymmetric Prescriptive/Descriptive Game Theory for Counterterrorism
- 30 Near-Misses and Decision Making Under Uncertainty in the Context of Cybersecurity
- Index
- References
19 - Defender-Attacker Decision Tree Analysis to Combat Terrorism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 December 2017
Book contents
- Improving Homeland Security Decisions
- Improving Homeland Security Decisions
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- 1 Improving Homeland Security Decisions
- 2 Probabilistic Risk Analysis and Terrorism Risk
- 3 Integrating Stakeholder Values into Strategic Planning through Comparative Risk Analysis
- 4 Validating Terrorism Risk Assessment Models – Lessons Learned from 11 Models
- 5 Coping with Uncertainty in Adversarial Risk Analysis
- 6 A Risk and Economic Analysis of Dirty Bomb Attacks on the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach
- 7 Regional Transportation and Supply Chain Modeling for Large-Scale Emergencies
- 8 Economic Consequences of Terrorism and Natural Disasters: The Computable General Equilibrium Approach
- 9 Economic Resilience to Terrorism and Natural Hazards
- 10 The Temporal Regional Economic Impacts of a Hurricane Disaster on Oil Refinery Operations: A FlexNIEMO Approach
- 11 Risk-Informed Benefit-Cost Analysis
- 12 Enhancing Post-disaster Economic Resilience: Public-Private Partnership for Insuring Terrorism
- 13 Economic Impacts of Changes in Wait Times at U.S. Ports of Entry
- 14 Organizational Decision Processes
- 15 A Value Model for Evaluating Homeland Security Decisions
- 16 Identifying, Structuring, and Comparing the Objectives of Al Qaeda and ISIL
- 17 Multi-objective Decision Making: Expected Utility vs. Some Widely Used (and Flawed) Methods
- 18 Achieving Multiple Objectives with Limited Resources: Using Utility Theory and Control Theory
- 19 Defender-Attacker Decision Tree Analysis to Combat Terrorism
- 20 Decision Making for Bioterror Preparedness: Examples from Smallpox Vaccination Policy
- 21 Stackelberg Security Games (SSG) Basics and Application Overview
- 22 Basic Solution Concepts and Algorithms for Stackelberg Security Games
- 23 Mixed-Integer Optimization Methods for Solving Stackelberg Security Games
- 24 Methods for Addressing the Unpredictable Real-World Element in Security
- 25 Learning to Play Stackelberg Security Games
- 26 Evaluating Deployed Decision Support Systems for Security: Challenges, Analysis, and Approaches
- 27 Homeland Security Resource Allocation Games: Considering Partially Strategic Attackers and Equity
- 28 Decision Analysis by Proxy for Adaptive Adversaries
- 29 Asymmetric Prescriptive/Descriptive Game Theory for Counterterrorism
- 30 Near-Misses and Decision Making Under Uncertainty in the Context of Cybersecurity
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Improving Homeland Security Decisions , pp. 445 - 468Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Bakir, N. O., & von Winterfeldt, D. (2011). Is better nuclear weapons detection capability justified? Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 8(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedford, T., & Cooke, R. (2001). Probabilistic risk analysis: Foundations and methods. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, R. K. (2003, August 14). Think the unthinkable. Tech Central Station. www.techcentralstation.com/081403D.html.Google Scholar
Bier, V., & Cox, L., Jr. (2007). Probabilistic risk analysis for engineered systems. In Edwards, W., Miles, R. F., & von Winterfeldt, D. (Eds.), Advances in decision analysis (pp. 279–310). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bolkcom, C., & Elias, B. (2006, February 16). Homeland security: Protecting airliners from terrorist missiles. National Defense. Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division: Congressional Research Service (CRS).Google Scholar
Chow, J., Chiesa, J., Dreyer, P., Eisman, P., Karasik, T. W., Kvitky, J., Linger, S., Ochmanek, D., & Shirley., C. (2005). Protecting commercial aviation against the shoulder-fired missile threat. Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
Clemen, R., & Reilly, T. (2013). Making hard decisions. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
DelBoca, R. (2003). Washington, DC: Prepared testimony before the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, Aviation Subcommittee.Google Scholar
Ezell, C. E., Bennett, S. P., von Winterfeldt, D., Sokolowski, J., & Collins, A. J. (2010). Probabilistic risk analysis and terrorism risk. Risk Analysis, 30(4), 575–589.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon., P., Kim, S., Moore, J. E., Park, H., & Richardson, H. (2006). The economic impacts of a terrorist attack on the U.S. aviation system. Risk Analysis, 27(3), 505–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grau, L. R. (2008, May–August). The RPG-7 on the battlefields of today and tomorrow. Infantry.Google Scholar
Howard, R. A., & Abbas, A. E. (2015). Foundations of decision analysis. New York: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Hunter, T. B. (2002, November 28). The proliferation of MANPADS. Jane’s Intelligence Review.Google Scholar
Keeney, R. L., & von Winterfeldt, D. (2007). Practical value models. In Edwards, E., Miles, R. F., & von Winterfeldt, D. (Eds.), Advances in decision analysis (pp. 232–252). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Merrick, J., & Parnell, G. (2011). A comparative analysis of PRA and intelligent adversary methods for counterterrorism risk management. Risk Analysis, 31(9), 1488–1510.Google Scholar
National Research Council. (2008). Department of Homeland Security bioterrorism risk assessment: A call for change. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, T M. (2004, November). External terrorist threats to civilian airliners: A summary risk analysis of MANPADS, other ballistic weapons risks, future threats, and possible countermeasures policies. University of Southern California: Center for Risk and Economic Analysis of Terrorism Events (CREATE). Revised February 2005.Google Scholar
Parnell, G. S., Smith, C. M., & Moxley, F. I. (2009). Intelligent adversary risk analysis: A bioterrorism risk management model. Risk Analysis, 30, 32–48.Google Scholar
Pate-Cornell, M. E. (2007). The engineering risk analysis method and some applications. In Edwards, W., Miles, R. F., & von Winterfeldt, D. (Eds.), Advances in decision analysis (pp. 302–324). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pate-Cornell, E., & Guikema, S. (2002). Probabilistic modeling of terrorist threats: A systematic analysis approach to setting priorities among countermeasures. Military Operations Research, 7(4), 5–20.Google Scholar
Phelps, M. (2003, January). Do SAMs pose a real threat to civil aviation? Aviation International News.Google Scholar
Santos, J. R., & Haimes, Y. Y. (2004). Modeling the demand reduction input-output (I-O) inoperability due to terrorism on interconnected structures. Risk Analysis, 24 1437–1451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanker, . (2002, November 29). Ideal terror weapons: Portable, plentiful missiles. New York Times.Google Scholar
Tambe, M. (2011). Security and game theory: Algorithms, deployed systems, lessons learned. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO). (2004). The Department of Homeland Security needs to fully adopt a knowledge-based approach to its Counter-MANPADS Development Program. Washington, DC: Author, GAO-04-341R.Google Scholar
Violence Policy Center. (2002). Sitting ducks: The threat to chemical and refinery industry from 50 caliber sniper rifles. www.vpc.org/50caliber.html.Google Scholar
von Winterfeldt, D., & Edwards, W. (1986). Decision analysis and behavioral research. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
von Winterfeldt, D., & O’Sullivan, T. (2006). Should we protect commercial airplanes against surface-to-air missile attacks by terrorists? Decision Analysis, 3, 63–75.Google Scholar
Weselby, H. (2012). Fuel burn vs. maintenance cost. Washington, DC: IIATA Maintenance Cost Conference.Google Scholar
Willis, H. H., Morral, A. R., Kelly, T. K., & Medby, J. J. (2005). Estimating terrorism risk. MG-388-RC, RAND Corporation. Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar