Abe, I. (1962). Call contours. Proceedings of the 4th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), The Hague, pp. 519–23.Google Scholar

Abercrombie, D. (1964). Syllable quantity and enclitics in English. In Abercrombie, D., Fry, D. B., MacCarthy, P. A. D., Scott, N. C. and Trim, J. L. M., eds., In Honour of Daniel Jones, London: Longmans, pp. 216–22.Google Scholar

Abraham, W. (2011). Preface: Traces of Karl Bühler's semiotic legacy in modern linguistics. In Goodwin, D. F., transl. of Bühler 1934, new edn 2011, Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. xiii–xlvii.Google Scholar

Adriaens, L. M. H. (1991). Ein Modell deutscher Intonation, PhD thesis, Eindhoven.Google Scholar

Allen, W. S. (1954). Living English speech, London: Longman.Google Scholar

Ambrazaitis, G. (2005). Between fall and fall-rise: Substance-function relations in German phrase-final intonation contours. Phonetica, 62, 196–214.Google Scholar

Ambrazaitis, G. (2009). Nuclear intonation in Swedish, PhD thesis, Lund University, Travaux de l'Institut de Linguistique de Lund 49.Google Scholar

Armstrong, L. E. and Ward, I. C. (1931). A handbook of English intonation, 2nd edn, Cambridge: W. Heffer.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Barry, W. J. (1981). Prosodic functions revisited again! Phonetica, 38, 320–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumann, S. (2006). The intonation of givenness: Evidence from German, Linguistische Arbeiten 508, Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolinger, D. (1978). Intonation across languages. In Greenberg, J. (ed.), Universals of human language, Stanford University Press, pp. 371–425.Google Scholar

Bolinger, D. (1986). Intonation and its parts: Melody in spoken English, London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Bolinger, D. (1989). Intonation and its uses: Melody in grammar and discourse, London: Edward Arnold.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brazil, D. (1975). Discourse intonation, Discourse Analysis Monographs No. 1, ELR, Birmingham University.Google Scholar

Brazil, D. (1978). Discourse intonation II, Discourse Analysis Monographs No. 2, ELR, Birmingham University.Google Scholar

Bruce, G. (1977). Swedish word accents in sentence perspective, Travaux de l'Institut de Linguistique de Lund XIII, Greerup: CWK.Google Scholar

Bryzgunova, E. A. (1977). Zvuki i intonatsija russkoj retshi [Sounds and intonation of the Russian language], Moscow: Russkij jazyk.Google Scholar

Bryzgunova, E. A. (1980). Intonatsija [Intonation]. In Shviedova, N. J., ed., Russkaja grammatika, vol. I, Moscow: Akademiia Nauka SSSR, pp. 96–122.Google Scholar

Bryzgunova, E. A. (1984). Emotsionaljno-stilistitsheskije razlitshija russkoj zvutshashjej retshi [Emotional and stylistic differences in Russian spontaneous speech] Moscow.Google Scholar

Bühler, K. (1931). Phonetik und Phonologie. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague, 4, 22–53.Google Scholar

Bühler, K. (1934). Sprachtheorie: Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache, Jena: Gustav Fischer. English transl. by Goodwin, D. F. (1990). Theory of language: The representational function of language, Amsterdam: Benjamins. New edn 2011, including Abraham (2011).Google Scholar

Catford, J. (1964). Phonation types: The classification of some laryngeal components of speech production. In Abercrombie, D., Fry, D. B., MacCarthy, P. A. D., Scott, N. C. and Trim, J. L. M., eds., In honour of Daniel Jones, London: Longman, pp. 26–37.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures, The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. and Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English, New York, Evanston, London: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Clark, H. (1996). Using language, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cohen, A. and ’t Hart, J. (1967). On the anatomy of intonation. Lingua, 19, 177–92.Google Scholar

Coleman, H. O. (1914). Intonation and emphasis. Miscellanea Phonetica, 1, 7–26.Google Scholar

Coustenoble, H. N. and Armstrong, L. E. (1934). Studies in French intonation, Cambridge: W. Heffer.Google Scholar

Cruttenden, A. (1974). An experiment involving comprehension of intonation in children from 7 to 10. Journal of Child Language, 1, 221–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cruttenden, A. (1986, 2nd edn, 1997). Intonation, Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cruttenden, A. (1995). Rises in English. In Lewis, J. Windsor, ed., Studies in general and English phonetics: Essays in honour of Professor J. D. O'Connor, Albingdon: Routledge, pp. 155–73.Google Scholar

Cruttenden, A. (1997). Intonation, Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics, 2nd edn, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Crystal, D. (1969a). Prosodic systems and intonation in English, Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Crystal, D. (1969b). Review of Halliday (1967). Language, 45, 378–93.Google Scholar

Dehé, N. and Braun, B. (2013). The prosody of question tags in English. English Language and Linguistics, 17, 129–56.Google Scholar

Delattre, P. (1948). Le Jeu de l'e instable de monosyllabe initiale en français. I. The French Review, 22, 455–9.Google Scholar

Delattre, P. (1949). Le Jeu de l'e instable de monosyllabe initiale en français. II. The French Review, 23, 43–7.Google Scholar

Delattre, P. (1951). Le jeu de l'e instable intérieur en français. The French Review, 24, 341–51.Google Scholar

Delattre, P. (1966). Studies in French and comparative phonetics, The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Di Cristo, A. (1998). Intonation in French. In Hirst, D., Di Cristo, A., eds., Intonation systems: A survey of twenty languages, Cambridge University Press, pp. 195–218.Google Scholar

d'Imperio, M. (2000). The role of perception in defining tonal targets and their alignment, PhD thesis, Ohio State University.Google Scholar

Dombrowski, E. (2003). Semantic features of accent contours: Effects of F0 peak position and F0 time shape. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Barcelona, pp. 1217–20.Google Scholar

Dombrowski, E. (2013). Semantic features of ‘stepped’ versus ‘continuous’ contours in German intonation. Phonetica, 70:4, 247–73.Google ScholarPubMed

Dombrowski, E. and Niebuhr, O. (2005). Acoustic patterns and communicative functions of phrase-final rises in German: Activating and restricting contours. Phonetica, 62, 176–95.Google Scholar

Dombrowski, E. and Niebuhr, O. (2010). Shaping phrase-final rising intonation in German. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Speech Prosody, Chicago, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar

Draper, M., Ladefoged, P. and Whitteridge, D. (1959). Respiratory muscles in speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 2, 16–27.Google Scholar

Draper, M., Ladefoged, P. and Whitteridge, D. (1960). Expiratory pressures and airflow during speech. British Medical Journal, 1837–43.Google Scholar

Dryer, M. S. (2013). Position of interrogative phrases in content questions. In Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M. S., Gil, D. and Comrie, B., eds., The world atlas of language structures online, Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/93)Google Scholar

Essen, O. von (1964). Grundzüge der hochdeutschen Satzintonation, Ratingen: A. Hen-n Verlag.Google Scholar

Fagyal, Z. (1997). Chanting intonation in French. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 47, 77–90.Google Scholar

Fant, G. and Kruckenberg, A. (1989). Preliminaries to the study of Swedish prose reading and reading style. STL-QPSR, 2, 1–80.Google Scholar

Fant, G. and Kruckenberg, A. (1999). Prominence correlates in Swedish prosody. Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), San Francisco, pp. 1749–52.Google Scholar

Féry, C. and Kügler, F. (2008). Pitch accent scaling on given, new and focused constituents in German. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 680–703.Google Scholar

Firth, J. R. (1948). Sounds and prosodies. Transactions of the Philological Society, 127–52.Google Scholar

Firth, J. R. (1957). Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fletcher, J. and Harrington, J. (2001). High rising terminals and fall-rise tunes in Australian English. Phonetica, 58, 215–29.Google Scholar

Fletcher, J., Stirling, L., Mushin, I. and Wales, R. (2002). Intonational rises and dialog acts in the Australian English map task. Language and Speech, 45, 229–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fónagy, I. (2003). Des Fonctions de l'intonation: Essai de synthèse. Flambeau, Revue Annuelle de la Section Française, Université des Langues Étrangères de Tokyo, 29, 1–20.Google Scholar

Fónagy, I., Bérard, E. and Fónagy, J. (1983). Les Clichés mélodiques du français parisien. Folia Linguistica, 17, 153–85.Google Scholar

Fries, C. C. (1964). On the intonation of ‘yes-no’, questions in English. In Abercrombie, D., Fry, D. B., MacCarthy, P. A. D., Scott, N. C. and Trim, J. L. M., eds., In Honour of Daniel Jones, London: Longman, pp. 242–54.Google Scholar

Fry, D. B. (1955). Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27, 765–8.Google Scholar

Fry, D. B. (1958). Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech, 1, 126–52.Google Scholar

Fry, D. B. (1965). The dependence of stress judgments on vowel formant structure. In Zwirner, E. and Bethge, W., Proceedings of the 6th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Basle, pp. 306–11.Google Scholar

Gardiner, A. (1932). The theory of speech and language, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gårding, E. (1979). Sentence intonation in Swedish. Phonetica, 36, 207–15.Google Scholar

Gårding, E. (1982). Swedish prosody: Summary of a project. Phonetica, 39, 288–301.Google Scholar

Gårding, E., Kratochvil, P., Svantesson, J.-O. and Zhang, Z. (1985). Tone 4 and tone 3 discrimination in Modern Standard Chinese. Working Papers, Department of Linguistics, Lund University, 28, 53–67.Google Scholar

Gartenberg, R. and Panzlaff-Reuter, C. (1991). Production and perception of F0 peak patterns in German. Arbeitsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik der Universität Kiel (AIPUK), 25, 29–113.Google Scholar

Garvin, P. L. (1994). Karl Bühler's field theory in the light of the current interest in pragmatics. In Čmejrková, S. and Štícha, F., eds., The syntax of sentence and text: A Festschrift for František Daneš, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 59–66.Google Scholar

Gibbon, D. (1976). Perspectives of intonation analysis, Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Gibbon, D. (1998). Intonation in German. In Hirst, D. and Di Cristo, A., eds., Intonation systems: A survey of twenty languages, Cambridge University Press, pp. 78–95.Google Scholar

Ginzburg, J. (2012). The interactive stance: Meaning for conversation, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Grabe, E. (1998). Comparative intonational phonology: English and German, PhD thesis, University of Nijmegen.Google Scholar

Grabe, E., Gussenhoven, C., Haan, J., Marsi, E. and Post, B. (1997). Preaccentual pitch and speaker attitude in Dutch. Language and Speech, 41, 63–85.Google Scholar

Grammont, M. (1894). La Loi des trois consonnes. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, 8, 53–90.Google Scholar

Grammont, M. (1934). La Prononciation française, 8th edn, Paris: Librairie Delagrave.Google Scholar

Gregoromichelaki, E. (2013). Review of Ginzburg (2012). The interactive stance. Folia Linguistica, 47, 293–306.Google Scholar

Grice, H. P. (1957). Meaning. Philosophical Review, 66, 377–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grice, H. P. (1995). Leading tones and downstep in English. Phonology, 12, 183–233.Google Scholar

Grice, M. and Baumann, S. (2002). Deutsche Intonation und GToBI. Linguistische Berichte, 191, 267–98.Google Scholar

Grice, M., Baumann, S. and Benzmüller, R. (2005). German intonation in autosegmental-metrical phonology. In Jun, S.-A., ed., Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing, Oxford University Press, pp. 55–83.Google Scholar

Gussenhoven, C. (1993). The Dutch foot and the chanted call. Journal of Linguistics, 29, 37–63.Google Scholar

Gussenhoven, C. (2002). Intonation and interpretation: Phonetics and phonology. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Speech Prosody, Aix-en-Provence, 47–57.Google Scholar

Gussenhoven, C. (2004). The phonology of tone and intonation, Research Surveys in Linguistics, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1961). Categories of the theory of grammar. Word, 17, 241–92.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1963a). The tones of English. Archivum Linguisticum, 15, 1–28.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1963b). Intonation in English grammar. Transactions of the Philological Society, pp. 143–69.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). Intonation and grammar in British English, The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1970). A course in spoken English: Intonation, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. and Greaves, W. S. (2008). Intonation in the grammar of English, London, Oakville, Conn.: Equinox.Google Scholar

Harris, Z. S. (1951). Methods in structural linguistics, University of Chicago Press (repr. as Structural Linguistics, University of Chicago Press, 1960).Google Scholar

Hasan, R. (2009). Wanted: A theory of integrated sociolinguistics. In Webster, J. J., ed., Collected Works of Ruqaiya Hasan, vol. II, Sheffield: Equinox, pp. 5–40.Google Scholar

Hawkins, S. (2003). Roles and representations of systematic fine phonetic detail in speech understanding. Journal of Phonetics, 31, 373–405.Google Scholar

Hermann, E. (1942). Probleme der Frage. Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen, Philologisch-Historische Klasse, 2–4, 121–408.Google Scholar

Hertrich, I. (1991). The interaction of intonation and accent at the sentence level: Potential perceptual ambiguities. Arbeitsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik der Universität Kiel (AIPUK), 25, 187–218.Google Scholar

Hirschberg, J. and Ward, G. (1992). The influence of pitch range, duration, amplitude and spectral features on the interpretation of the rise-fall-rise intonation contour in English. Journal of Phonetics, 20, 241–51.Google Scholar

Hughes, G. (1998). Swearing: A social history of foul language, oaths and profanity in English, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books Ltd.Google Scholar

IPDS (1994). The Kiel corpus of read speech, vol. I, CD-ROM#1, Kiel: IPDS.Google Scholar

IPDS(1995). The Kiel corpus of spontaneous speech, vol. I, CDROM#2, Kiel: IPDS.Google Scholar

IPDS(1996). The Kiel corpus of spontaneous speech, vol. II, CDROM#3, Kiel: IPDS.Google Scholar

IPDS(1997). The Kiel corpus of spontaneous speech, vol. III, CDROM#4, Kiel: IPDS.Google Scholar

IPDS(2006). The Kiel corpus of spontaneous speech, vol. IV, Video Task Scenario: Lindenstrasse, DVD#1. Kiel: IPDS.Google Scholar

Isačenko, A. V. (1966). On the conative function of language. In Vachek, J., ed., A Prague School reader in linguistics, Bloomington, London: Indiana University Press, pp. 88–97.Google Scholar

Isačenko, A. V. and Schädlich, H. J. (1970). A model of standard German intonation, The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Jakobson, R. (1960). Linguistics and poetics. In Sebeok, T. A., ed., Styles in language, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 350–77.Google Scholar

Jia, Y. (2012). Phonetic realization and phonological analysis of focus in Standard Chinese, Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.Google Scholar

Jones, D. (1956). An outline of English phonetics, 8th edn, Cambridge: W. Heffer.Google Scholar

Jun, S.-A. and Fougeron, C. (2002). The realizations of the accentual phrase in French intonation. In Hualde, J. I., ed., Special issue on intonation in the Romance languages, Probus, 14: 147–72.Google Scholar

Kamp, H. and Reyle, U. (1993). From discourse to logic, vol. I, Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Kamp, H., Genabith, J. van and Reyle, U. (2011). Discourse representation theory: An updated survey. In Gabbay, D., ed., Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 2nd edn, vol. XV, pp. 125–394.Google Scholar

Khromovskikh, T. (2003). Perzeptorische Untersuchungen zur Intonation der Frage im Russischen [A perceptual study of question intonation in Russian], MA dissertation, University of Kiel.Google Scholar

Kingdon, R. (1958). The groundwork of English intonation, London: Longman.Google Scholar

Kingdon, R. (1965). The groundwork of English stress, 3rd edn, London: Longman.Google Scholar

Kleber, F. (2005). Experimentalphonetische Untersuchungen zu Form und Funktion fallender Intonationskonturen im Englischen [Form and function of falling intonation contours in English: An experimental phonetic study], MA dissertation, University of Kiel.Google Scholar

Kleber, F. (2006). Form and function of falling pitch contours in English. Proceedings of Speech Prosody, Dresden, 61–4. (English summary of Kleber 2005.)Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J. (1970). Etymologie und strukturelle Sprachbetrachtung. Indogermanische Forschungen, 75, 16–31.Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J. (1977, 2nd edn 1995). Einführung in die Phonetik des Deutschen, Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J. (1978). Englische ‘Question Tags’ und ihre deutschen Entsprechungen. Arbeits-berichte des Instituts für Phonetik der Universität Kiel (AIPUK), 10, 60–77.Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J. (1979). Kommunikative Aspekte satzphonetischer Prozesse im Deutschen. In Vater, H., ed., Phonologische Probleme des Deutschen, Tübingen: G. Narr, pp. 13–39.Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J. (1987a). The linguistic functions of F0 peaks. Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Tallinn, vol. III, pp. 149–62.Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J. (1987b). Categorical pitch perception. Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Tallinn, vol. V, pp. 331–3.Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J. (1990a). Macro and micro F0 in the synthesis of intonation. In Kingston, J. and Beckman, M. E., eds., Papers in Laboratory Phonology I. Cambridge University Press, pp. 115–38.Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J. (1990b). Segmental reduction in connected speech in German: Phonological facts and phonetic explanations. In Hardcastle, W. J. and Marchal, A. (eds.), Speech Production and Speech Modelling, Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 69–92.Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J. (1991a). Terminal intonation patterns in single-accent utterances of German: Phonetics, phonology and semantics. Arbeitsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik der Universität Kiel (AIPUK), 25, 115–85.Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J. (1991b). A model of German intonation. Arbeitsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik der Universität Kiel (AIPUK), 25, 295–360.Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J. ed. (1991c). Studies in German intonation. Arbeitsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik der Universität Kiel (AIPUK), 25, 1–368.Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J. (1995). The Kiel Intonation Model (KIM), its implementation in TTS synthesis and its application to the study of spontaneous speech. www.ipds.uni-kiel.de/kjk/forschung/kim.en.htmlGoogle Scholar

Kohler, K. J. (1997a). Parametric control of prosodic variables by symbolic input in TTS synthesis. In van Santen, J. P. H., Sproat, R. W., Olive, J. P. and Hirschberg, J., eds., Progress in Speech Synthesis, New York: Springer, pp. 459–75.Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J. (1997b). Modelling prosody in spontaneous speech. In Sagisaka, Y., Campbell, N. and Higuchi, N., eds., Computing prosody: Computational models for processing spontaneous speech, New York: Springer, pp. 187–210.Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J. (1999). Articulatory prosodies in German reduced speech. Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), San Francisco, vol. I, pp. 89–92.Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J. (2001a). The investigation of connected speech processes: Theory, method, hypotheses and empirical data. Arbeitsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik der Universität Kiel (AIPUK), 35, 1–32.Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J. (2001b). Variability of closing and opening gestures in speech communication. Arbeitsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik der Universität Kiel (AIPUK), 35, 33–96.Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J. (2001c). Articulatory dynamics of vowels and consonants in speech communication. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 31, 1–16.Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J. (2002). Phrase-level sound structures in French. In Barry, W. J. and Pützer, M., eds., Festschrift für Max Mangold zum 80. Geburtstag, Reports in Phonetics, University of the Saarland (PHONUS), No. 6, University of the Saarland, pp. 129–57.Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J. (2003). Domains of temporal control in speech and language: From utterance to segment. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Barcelona, vol. I, pp. 7–10.Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J. (2004). Pragmatic and attitudinal meanings of pitch patterns in German syntactically marked questions. In Fant, G., Fujisaki, H., Cao, J. and Xu, Y., eds., From traditional phonology to modern speech processing: Festschrift for Professor Wu Zongji's 95th birthday, Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, pp. 205–14.Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J. (2005). Timing and communicative functions of pitch contours. Phonetica, 62, 88–105.Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J. (2006a). What is emphasis and how is it coded? In Hoffmann, R. and Mixdorff, H., eds., Proceedings of Speech Prosody, Dresden: TUD Press, pp. 748–51. ppt presentation www.ipds.uni-kiel.de/kjk/pub_exx/kk2006_2/sp2006.zip; audio files www.ipds.uni-kiel.de/kjk/pub_exx/kk2006_2/sp2006.htmlGoogle Scholar

Kohler, K. J. (2006b). Paradigms in experimental prosodic analysis: From measurement to function. In Sudhoff, S., Lenertová, D., Meyer, R., Pappert, S., Augurzky, P., Mleinek, I., Richter, N. and Schließer, J., eds., Methods in empirical prosody research, Berlin, New York: de Gruyter, pp. 123–52.Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J. (2007). Review of A. Dufter, Typen sprachrhythmischer Konturbildung. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. Studies in Language, 7, 873–84.Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J. (2008). The perception of prominence patterns. Phonetica, 65, 257–69.Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J. (2009a). Rhythm in speech and language. Phonetica, 66, 29–45.Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J. (2009b). Patterns of prosody in the expression of the speaker and the appeal to the listener. In Fant, G., Fujisaki, H. and Shen, J., eds., Frontiers in phonetics and speech science, Beijing: The Commercial Press, pp. 287–302.Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J. (2010). The transmission of meaning by prosodic phrasing: A comparison of French with English and German, using no Ls and Hs. Phonetica, 67, 100–24.Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J. (2011a). On the interdependence of sounds and prosodies in communicative functions. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Hong Kong, pp. 19–27.Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J. (2011b). Communicative functions integrate segments in prosodies and prosodies in segments. Phonetica, 68, 25–56.Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J. (2012). The perception of lexical stress in German: Effects of segmental duration and vowel quality in different prosodic patterns. Phonetica, 69, 68–93.Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J. (2013a). Review of Ladd (2011), From phonetics to phonology and back again. Phonetica, 69, 254–73.Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J. (2013b). From communicative functions to prosodic forms. Phonetica, 70, 1–23.Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J. and Niebuhr, O. (2011). On the role of articulatory prosodies in German message decoding. Phonetica, 68, 57–87.Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J., Kleber, F. and Peters, B., eds. (2005). Prosodic structures in German spontaneous speech. Arbeitsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik der Universität Kiel (AIPUK), 35a, 1–345.Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J. and Niebuhr, O. (2007). The phonetics of emphasis. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Saarbrücken, pp. 2145–8.Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J, Pätzold, M. and Simpson, A. (1995). From scenario to segment: The controlled elicitation, transcription, segmentation and labeling of spontaneous speech. Arbeitsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik der Universität Kiel (AIPUK), 29, 1–141.Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J., Peters, B. and Scheffers, M. (2017a). The Kiel corpus of spoken German – read and spontaneous speech. New edn, revised and enlarged. Data. Kiel: Christian-Albrechts-Universität. www.isfas.uni-kiel.de/de/linguistik/forschung/kiel-corpusGoogle Scholar

Kohler, K. J., Peters, B. and Scheffers, M. (2017b). The Kiel corpus of spoken German – read and spontaneous speech. New edn, revised and enlarged. Documentation. Kiel: Christian-Albrechts-Universität. www.isfas.uni-kiel.de/de/linguistik/forschung/kiel-corpus/docs/Info_KielCorp_2017.pdfGoogle Scholar

Ladd, D. R. (1978). Stylized intonation. Language, 54, 517–38.Google Scholar

Ladd, D. R. (1983). Phonological features of intonational peaks. Language, 59, 721–59.Google Scholar

Ladd, D. R. (1996, 2nd edn 2008). Intonational phonology, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ladd, D. R. (2011). Phonetics in phonology. In Goldsmith, J., Riggle, J. and Yu, A. C. L., eds., The handbook of phonological theory, 2nd edn, Wiley-Blackwell: Chichester, pp. 348–73.Google Scholar

Ladefoged, P. (1960). The regulation of subglottal pressure. Folia Phoniatrica, 12, 169–75.Google Scholar

Ladefoged, P., Draper, M. and Whitteridge, D. (1958). Syllables and stress. Miscellanea Phonetica, 3, 1–14, London: International Phonetic Association.Google Scholar

Laver, J. (1980). The phonetic description of voice quality, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lee, W. R. (1956). Fall-rise intonations in English. English Studies, 37, 62–72.Google Scholar

Lees, R.B. (1961). The phonology of Modern Standard Turkish, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Léon, P. (1966). Apparition, maintien et chute du ‘e’ caduc. La Linguistique, 2, 111–22.Google Scholar

Liberman, M. (1975). The intonational system of English, PhD thesis, MIT, Indiana University Linguistic Club, Bloomington.Google Scholar

Liberman, M. and Pierrehumbert, J. (1984). Intonational invariance under changes in pitch range and length. In Aronoff, M. and Oehrle, R., eds., Language sound structure, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 157–233.Google Scholar

Liberman, M. and Prince, A. (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 249–336.Google Scholar

Lindblom, B. (1990). Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In Hardcastle, W. J. and Marchal, A., eds., Speech production and speech modelling, Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 403–39.Google Scholar

Liu, F. (2009). Intonation systems of Mandarin and English: A functional approach, PhD thesis, University of Chicago.Google Scholar

Liu, F. and Xu, Y. (2005). Parallel encoding of focus and interrogative meaning in Mandarin. Phonetica, 62, 70–87.Google Scholar

Local, J. and Walker, G. (2005). Methodological imperatives for investigating the phonetic organization and phonological structures of spontaneous speech. Phonetica, 62, 120–30.Google Scholar

Lyons, J. (1968). Introduction to theoretical linguistics, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Malécot, A.(1976). The effect of linguistic and paralinguistic variables on the elision of the French mute-e. Phonetica, 33, 93–112.Google Scholar

Malinowski, B. (1923). The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In Ogden, C. K. and Richards, I. A., eds., The meaning of meaning, London: Routledge, pp. 146–52.Google Scholar

Mathesius, V. (1966). Verstärkung und Emphase. In Vachek, J., A Prague School reader in linguistics, Bloomington, London: Indiana University Press, pp. 426–32.Google Scholar

Niebuhr, O. (2003a). Perzeptorische Untersuchungen zu Zeitvariablen in Grundfrequenzgipfeln [Perceptual investigations of timing variables in pitch peak contours], MA dissertation, University of Kiel.Google Scholar

Niebuhr, O. (2003b). Perceptual study of timing variables in F0 peaks. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Barcelona, pp. 1225–8. (English summary of Niebuhr 2003a.)Google Scholar

Niebuhr, O. (2007a). Perzeption und kognitive Verarbeitung der Sprechmelodie: Theoretische Grundlagen und empirische Untersuchungen [Perception and cognitive processing of speech melody: Theoretical foundations and empirical investigations]. In Steube, A., ed., Language, Context, and Cognition, vol. VII, Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Niebuhr, O. (2007b). The signalling of German rising-falling intonation categories: The interplay of synchronization, shape, and height. Phonetica, 64, 174–91. (English summary of Niebuhr 2003a, 2007a.)Google Scholar

Niebuhr, O. (2008). Coding of intonational meanings beyond F0: Evidence from utterance-final /t/ aspiration in German. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124, 1252–63.Google Scholar

Niebuhr, O. (2010). On the phonetics of intensifying emphasis in German. Phonetica, 67, 170–98.Google Scholar

Niebuhr, O. ed. (2012). Understanding prosody: The role of context, function and communication, Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Niebuhr, O. (2013). Resistance is futile: The intonation between continuation rise and calling contour in German. Proceedings of the 14th Interspeech Conference, Lyons, 225–9.Google Scholar

Niebuhr, O. and Kohler, K. J. (2004). Perception and cognitive processing of tonal alignment in German. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages. Emphasis on Tone Languages, Beijing: The Institute of Linguistics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, 155–8.Google Scholar

Niebuhr, O. and Kohler, K. J. (2011). Perception of phonetic detail in the identification of highly reduced words. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 319–29.Google Scholar

Niebuhr, O., d'Imperio, M., Gili Fivela, B. and Cangemi, F. (2011). Are there ‘shapers’ and ‘aligners’? Individual differences in signalling pitch accent category. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Hong Kong, pp. 120–3.Google Scholar

O'Connor, J. D. (1955). The intonation of tag questions in English. English Studies, 36, 97–105.Google Scholar

O'Connor, J. D. and Arnold, G. F. (1961). Intonation of colloquial English, London: Longman.Google Scholar

Ogden, C. K. and Richards, I. A. (1956). The meaning of meaning, International Library of Psychology Philosophy and Scientific Method, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Ogden, R. (2012). Making sense of outliers. Phonetica, 69, 48–67.Google Scholar

Ohala, J. (1983). Cross-language use of pitch: An ethological view. Phonetica, 40, 1–18.Google Scholar

Ohala, J. (1984). An ethological perspective on common cross-language utilization of F0 of voice. Phonetica, 41, 1–16.Google Scholar

Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J. and Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning, Urbana, Chicago, London: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Palmer, H. E. (1924). English intonation with systematic exercises, 2nd edn, Cambridge: W. Heffer.Google Scholar

Palmer, H. E. and Blandford, F. G. (1939). A grammar of spoken English, 2nd edn, Cambridge: W. Heffer.Google Scholar

Panconcelli-Calzia, G. (1948). Phonetik als Naturwissenschaft, Berlin: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Passy, P. (1890). Étude sur les changements phonétiques et leurs caractères généraux, Paris: Firmin-Didot.Google Scholar

Passy, J. and Rambeau, A. (1918). Chrestomathie française, Leipzig, Berlin: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar

Peters, B. (2001). ‘Video Task’ oder ‘Daily Soap Szenario’: Ein neues Verfahren zur kontrollierten Elizitation von Spontansprache. www.ipds.uni-kiel.de/pub_exx/bp2001_1/Linda21.htmlGoogle Scholar

Peters, B. (2006). Form und Funktion prosodischer Grenzen im Gespräch [Form and function of prosodic phrasing in conversation], PhD thesis, University of Kiel.Google Scholar

Pheby, J. (1975). Intonation und Grammatik im Deutschen, Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, J. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation, PhD thesis, MIT.Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, J. and Hirschberg, J. (1990). The meaning pf intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In Cohen, P. R., Morgan, J. and Pollack, M. E., eds., Intentions in Communication, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 271–311.Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, J. and Steele, S. A. (1987). How many rise-fall-rise contours? Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Tallinn, vol. III, pp. 145–8.Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, J. and Steele, S. A. (1989). Categories of tonal alignment in English. Phonetica, 46, 181–96.Google Scholar

Pike, K. L. (1945). The intonation of American English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Rathcke, T. V.(2006). A perceptual study on Russian questions and statements. Arbeitsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik der Universität Kiel (AIPUK), 37, 51–62. (English summary of Khromovskikh 2005.)Google Scholar

Repp, B. H. (1984). Categorical perception, issues, methods, findings. In Lass, N. J., ed., Speech and language: Advances in basic research and practice, vol. X, Academic Press: Orlando, pp. 244–335.Google Scholar

Rialland, A. (2007). Question prosody: An African perspective. In Gussenhoven, C. and Riad, C., eds., Tones and tunes: Studies in word and sentence prosody, Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 35–62.Google Scholar

Rousselot, l'Abbé P. J. (1892). Les Modifications du langage, étudiées dans le patois d'une famille de Cellefrouin Charante, Paris: H. Walter.Google Scholar

Rousselot, l'Abbé P. J. (1897–1901). Principes de phonétique expérimentale, Paris: H. Walter.Google Scholar

Saussure, F. de (1922). Cours de linguistique générale, ed. Bally, Ch. and Sechehaye, A., Paris: Payot.Google Scholar

Schäfer-Vincent, K. (1982). Significant points: Pitch period detection as a problem of segmentation. Phonetica, 39, 241–53.Google Scholar

Schäfer-Vincent, K. (1983). Pitch period detection and chaining: Method and evaluation. Phonetica, 40, 177–202.Google Scholar

Scheffers, M. and Rettstadt, T. (1997). xassp: User's manual (Advanced Speech Signal Processor under the X Window system). Arbeitsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik der Universität Kiel (AIPUK), 32, 31–115. version 1.3.8 May 2000: www.ipds.uni-kiel.de/kjk/pub_exx/aipuk32/xassp_manual.pdfGoogle Scholar

Schegloff, E., Jefferson, G. and Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–82.Google Scholar

Schubiger, M. (1958). English intonation, Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Scripture, E. W. (1902). The elements of experimental phonetics, New York: Scribner's Sons/London: Arnold.Google Scholar

Scripture, E. W. (1935). Bulletin of the International Society of Experimental Phonetics III. Archives Néerlandaises de Phonétique Expérimentale, 11, 133–47.Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Selting, M. (1995). Prosodie im Gespräch, Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Sharp, A. L. (1958). Falling-rising intonation patterns in English. Phonetica, 2, 127–52.Google Scholar

't Hart, J. (1998). Intonation in Dutch. In Hirst, D. and Di Cristo, A., eds., Intonation systems: A survey of twenty languages, Cambridge University Press, pp. 96–111.Google Scholar

’t Hart, J., Collier, R. and Cohen, A. (1990). A perceptual study of intonation: An experimental-phonetic approach to speech melody, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Trojan, F., Tembrock, G. and Schendl, H. (1975). Biophonetik, Mannheim, Vienna, Zürich: Bibliographisches Institut.Google Scholar

Trubetzkoy, N. S. (1939). Grundzüge der Phonologie, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht (3rd edn 1962).Google Scholar

Truckenbrodt, H. (2002). Upstep and embedded register levels. Phonology, 19, 77–120.Google Scholar

Uldall, E. (1960). Attitudinal meanings conveyed by intonation contours. Language and Speech, 3, 223–4.Google Scholar

Uldall, E. (1964). Dimensions of meaning in intonation. In Abercrombie, D., Fry, D., MacCarthy, P., Scott, N. and Trim, J. L., eds., In Honour of Daniel Jones. London: Longman, pp. 271–9.Google Scholar

Vaihinger, H. (1920). Die Philosophie des Als Ob, Leipzig: Felix Meiner. English transl. by C. K. Ogden (1935). The philosophy of ‘as if’, International Library of Psychology Philosophy and Scientific Method, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Vaissière, J. (2006). La Phonétique, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Voegelin, C. F. and Ellinghausen, M. E. (1943). Turkish structure. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 63, 34–65.Google Scholar

Wagner, P. (2002). Vorhersage und Wahrnehmung deutscher Betonungsmuster, PhD thesis, University of Bonn.Google Scholar

Ward, G. and Hirschberg, J. (1985). Implicating uncertainty. Language, 61, 747–76.Google Scholar

Waterson, N. (1956). Some aspects of the phonology of the nominal forms of the Turkish word. In Honour of J. R. Firth, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 18, 578–91.Google Scholar

Wegener, Ph. (1885). Untersuchungen über die Grundfragen des Sprachlebens, Halle: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Wells, J. C. (2006). English intonation: An introduction, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wichmann, A. (2004). The intonation of please-requests: A corpus-based study. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1521–49.Google Scholar

Xu, Y. (1999). Effects of tone and focus on the formation and alignment of F0 contours. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 55–105.Google Scholar

Xu, Y. and Liu, F. (2012). Intrinsic coherence of prosodic and segmental aspects of speech. In Niebuhr, (2012), pp. 1–25.Google Scholar

Xu, Y. and Xu, C. X. (2005). Phonetic realization of focus in English declarative intonation. Journal of Phonetics, 33, 159–97.Google Scholar

Zwirner, E. and , K. (1936, 2nd edn 1966). Grundfragen der Phonometrie. Basle: Karger.Google Scholar