Book contents
- Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine
- Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part I Psychology Health and Illness
- Part II Medical Topics
- Section 1 Prevention and Screening
- 87 Genetic Testing
- 88 Immunization
- 89 Screening
- 90 Screening: Antenatal
- 91 Screening: Cancer
- 92 Screening: Cardiac
- Section 2 Medical Conditions and Symptoms
- Section 3 Treatment and Care
- Index
- References
89 - Screening
from Section 1 - Prevention and Screening
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2019
Book contents
- Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine
- Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part I Psychology Health and Illness
- Part II Medical Topics
- Section 1 Prevention and Screening
- 87 Genetic Testing
- 88 Immunization
- 89 Screening
- 90 Screening: Antenatal
- 91 Screening: Cancer
- 92 Screening: Cardiac
- Section 2 Medical Conditions and Symptoms
- Section 3 Treatment and Care
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine , pp. 404 - 406Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Andermann, A., Blancquaert, I., Beauchamp, S., et al. (2008). Revisiting Wilson and Jungner in the genomic age: a review of screening criteria over the past 40 years. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 86 (4), 317–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, A. S., Craigie, A. M., Caswell, S., et al. (2014). The impact of a bodyweight and physical activity intervention (BeWEL) initiated through a national colorectal cancer screening programme: randomised controlled trial. BMJ, 348, g1823.Google Scholar
Brodersen, J. & Siersma, V. D. (2013). Long-term psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening mammography. Annals of Family Medicine, 11(2), 106–115.Google Scholar
Brouwers, M. C., De, V. C., Bahirathan, L., et al. (2011a). Effective interventions to facilitate the uptake of breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening: an implementation guideline. Implementation Science, 6, 112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brouwers, M. C., De, V. C., Bahirathan, L., et al. (2011b). What implementation interventions increase cancer screening rates? A systematic review. Implementation Science, 6, 111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferroni, E., Camilloni, L., Jimenez, B., et al. (2012). How to increase uptake in oncologic screening: a systematic review of studies comparing population-based screening programs and spontaneous access. Preventive Medicine, 55 (6), 587–596.Google Scholar
Hall, S., Bobrow, M. & Marteau, T. M. (2000). Psychological consequences for parents of false negative results on prenatal screening for Down’s syndrome: retrospective interview study. BMJ 320(7232), 407–412.Google Scholar
Hall, S., Chitty, L., Dormandy, E., et al. (2007). Undergoing prenatal screening for Down’s syndrome: presentation of choice and information in Europe and Asia. European Journal of Human Genetics, 15 (5), 563–569.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, T. C. & Del, M. C. (2015). Patients’ expectations of the benefits and harms of treatments, screening, and tests: a systematic review. JAMA Internal Medicine, 175 (2), 274–286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jorgensen, K. J., Keen, J. D. & Gotzsche, P. C. (2011). Is mammographic screening justifiable considering its substantial overdiagnosis rate and minor effect on mortality? Radiology, 260 (3), 621–627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kopans, D. B., Smith, R. A. & Duffy, S. W. (2011). Mammographic screening and ‘overdiagnosis’. Radiology, 260 (3), 616–620.Google Scholar
Lazcano-Ponce, E., Palacio-Mejia, L. S., Allen-Leigh, B., et al. (2008). Decreasing cervical cancer mortality in Mexico: effect of Papanicolaou coverage, birthrate, and the importance of diagnostic validity of cytology. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 17 (10), 2808–2817.Google Scholar
Lu, M., Moritz, S., Lorenzetti, D., et al. (2012). A systematic review of interventions to increase breast and cervical cancer screening uptake among Asian women. BMC Public Health, 12, 413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miles, A., Cockburn, J., Smith, R. A., et al. (2004). A perspective from countries using organized screening programs. Cancer, 101 (Suppl. 5), 1201–1213.Google Scholar
Miles, A., Rainbow, S. & von Wagner, C. (2011). Cancer fatalism and poor self-rated health mediate the association between socioeconomic status and uptake of colorectal cancer screening in England. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 20 (10), 2132–2140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miles, A., McClements, P. L., Steele, R. J., et al. (2015). The psychological impact of a colorectal cancer diagnosis following a negative fecal occult blood test result. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 24 (7), 1–7.Google Scholar
Raffle, A. E. & Gray, J. A. M. (2007). Screening: Evidence and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Solmi, F., von Wagner, C., Kobayashi, L. C., et al. (2015). Decomposing socio-economic inequality in colorectal cancer screening uptake in England. Social Science and Medicine, 134, 76–86.Google Scholar
Troein, M., Rastam, L. & Selander, S. (2002). Changes in health beliefs after labelling with hypercholesterolaemia. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 30 (1), 76–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van der Aalst, C. M., van Klaveren, R. J. & De Koning, H. J. (2010). Does participation to screening unintentionally influence lifestyle behaviour and thus lifestyle-related morbidity? Best Practice & Research: Clinical Gastroenterology, 24 (4), 465–478.Google Scholar
van Rijn, A. F., van Rossum, L. G., Deutekom, M., et al. (2008). Getting adequate information across to colorectal cancer screening subjects can be difficult. Journal of Medical Screening, 15 (3), 149–152.Google Scholar
Vlemmix, F., Warendorf, J. K., Rosman, A. N., et al. (2013). Decision aids to improve informed decision-making in pregnancy care: a systematic review. BJOG, 120 (3), 257–266.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. M. & Junger, C. T. (1968). Principles and practice of screening for disease. Public Health Paper 34. World Health Organization.Google Scholar