Aberson, C. L., & Gaffney, A. M. (2009). An integrated threat model of explicit and implicit attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 808–830.Google Scholar

Allison, R. (1985). Finland’s Relations with the Soviet Union, 1944–84. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Barlow, F. K., Sibley, C. G., & Hornsey, M. J. (2012). Rejection as a call to arms: Inter-racial hostility and support for political action as outcomes of race-based rejection in majority and minority groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 167–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berry, J.W. (1980). Acculturation as varieties of adaptation. In Padilla, A. (ed.), Acculturation: Theories and some new findings. Westview PressGoogle Scholar

Berry, J. W. (2001). A psychology of immigration. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 615–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berry, J. W., Taylor, D. M., & Kalin, R. (1977). Multiculturalism and Ethnic Attitudes in Canada. Ottawa, Canada: Minister of State for Multiculturalism.Google Scholar

Bizman, A., & Yinon, Y. (2001a). Intergroup and interpersonal threats as determinants of prejudice: The moderating role of in-group identification. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 23, 191–196.Google Scholar

Bizman, A., & Yinon, Y. (2001b). Perceived threat and Israeli Jews’ evaluations of Russian immigrants: The moderating role of Jewish and Israeli identity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 25, 691–704.Google Scholar

Bizumic, B., & Duckitt, J. (2008). “My group is not worthy of me”: Narcissism and ethnocentrism. Political Psychology, 29, 437–453.Google Scholar

Bourhis, R. Y., Moïse, L. C., Perreault, S. & Senécal, S. (1997). Towards an interactive acculturation model: A social psychological approach. International Journal of Psychology, 32, 369–386.Google Scholar

Brylka, A., Mähönen, T. A., & Jasinskaja-Lahti, I. (2015a). National identification and attitudes towards Russian immigrants in Finland: Investigating the role of perceived threats and gains. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 56, 670–677.Google Scholar

Brylka, A., Mähönen, T. A., & Jasinskaja-Lahti, I. (2015b). National identification and intergroup attitudes among members of the national majority and immigrants: Preliminary evidence for the mediational role of psychological ownership of a country. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 3, 24–45.Google Scholar

Brylka, A., Mähönen, T. A., Schellhaas, F. M. H., & Jasinskaja-Lahti, I. (2015). From cultural discordance to support for collective action: The roles of intergroup anxiety, trust and group status. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46, 897–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ceuppens, B., & Geschiere, P. (2005). Autochthony: Local or global? New modes in the struggle over citizenship and belonging in Africa and Europe. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 385–407.Google Scholar

Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Gausset, Q., Kenrick, J., & Gibb, R. (2011). Indigeneity and autochthony: A couple of false twins? Social Anthropology, 19, 135–142.Google Scholar

Golec de Zavala, A., Cichocka, A., Eidelson, R., & Jayawickreme, N. (2009). Collective narcissism and its social consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1074–1096.Google Scholar

Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Hayes, A. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50, 1–22.Google Scholar

Hodson, G., Dovidio, J. F., & Esses, V. M. (2003). Ingroup identification as a moderator of positive-negative asymmetry in social discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 215–233.Google Scholar

Horenczyk, G., Jasinskaja-Lahti, I., Sam, D. L., & Vedder, P. (2013). Mutuality in acculturation. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 221(4), 205–213.Google Scholar

Jaakkola, M. (2005). Suomalaisten suhtautuminen maahanmuuttajiin vuosina 1987–2003 [Finns’ attitudes towards immigrants in years 1987–2007]. Helsinki, Finland: Ministry of Labour.Google Scholar

Jaakkola, M. (2009). Maahanmuuttajat suomalaisten näkökulmasta: Asennemuutokset 1987–2007 [Immigrants from the perspective of Finns: Change in attitudes 1987–2007]. Helsinki, Finland: City of Helsinki Information Center.Google Scholar

Jasinskaja-Lahti, I., Liebkind, K., & Solheim, E. (2009). To identify or not to identify? National disidentification as an alternative reaction to perceived ethnic discrimination. Applied Psychology, 58(1), 105–128.Google Scholar

Mähönen, T. A., Brylka, A., & Jasinskaja-Lahti, I. (2014). Perceived ethnic superiority and immigrants’ attitudes towards multiculturalism and the national majority. International Journal of Psychology, 49, 318–322.Google Scholar

Mallett, R. K., Huntsinger, J. R., Sinclair, S., & Swim, J. K. (2008). Seeing through their eyes: When majority group members take collective action on behalf of an outgroup. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 11, 451–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martinovic, B., & Verkuyten, M. (2013). ‘We were here first, so we determine the rules of the game’: Autochthony and prejudice towards out-groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 637–647.Google Scholar

Migrants Integration Policy Index MIPEX (2015). Retrieved from www.mipex.eu/.Google Scholar

Navas, M., García, M., Sánchez, J., Rojas, A. J., Pumares, P., & Fernandez, J. S. (2005). Relative acculturation extended model (RAEM): New contributions with regard to the study of acculturation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 21–37.Google Scholar

Nieminen, T., Sutela, H., & Hannula, U. (2015). Ulkomaista syntyperää olevien työ ja hyvinvointi Suomessa 2014 [Work and well-being of foreigners in Finland 2014]. Helsinki, Finland: Statistics Finland.Google Scholar

Paolini, S., Hewstone, M., & Cairns, E. (2007). Direct and indirect intergroup friendship effects: Testing the moderating role of the affective and cognitive bases of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1406–1420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pettigrew, T. F. & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.Google Scholar

Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26, 298–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology, 7, 84–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Piontkowski, U., Rohmann, A., & Florack, A. (2002). Concordance of acculturation attitudes and perceived threat. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 5, 221–232.Google Scholar

Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S., Halevy, N., & Eidelson, R. (2008). Toward a unifying model of identification with groups: Integrating theoretical perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 280–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rohmann, A., Florack, A., & Piontkowski, U. (2006). The role of discordant acculturation attitudes in perceived threat: An analysis of host and immigrant attitudes in Germany. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30, 683–702.Google Scholar

Saukkonen, P. (2013). Erilaisuuksien Suomi [Finland of diversities]. Helsinki, Finland: Gaudeamus.Google Scholar

Saukkonen, P. (2014). Multiculturalism and cultural policy in Northern Europe. The Nordic Journal of Cultural Policy/Nordisk Kulturpolitisk Tidsskrift, 16(02), 178–200.Google Scholar

Schatz, R. T., Staub, E., & Lavine, H. (1999). On the varieties of national attachment: Blind versus constructive patriotism. Political Psychology, 20, 151–174.Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. (2007). Universalism, values, and the inclusiveness of our moral universe. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 711–728.Google Scholar

Staerklé, C., Sidanius, J., Green, E. G. T., & Molina, L. (2005). Ethnic minority-majority asymmetry and attitudes towards immigrants across 11 nations. Psicologia Politica, 30, 7–26.Google Scholar

Statistics Finland (2014). Foreign-language speakers account for 90 per cent of the population growth in 2013. Retrieved from www.stat.fi/til/vaerak/2013/vaerak_2013_2014-03-21_tie_001_en.html.Google Scholar

Stephan, W. G., Boniecki, K. A., Ybarra, O., Bettencourt, A., Ervin, K. S., Jackson, L. A., McNatt, P. S., & Renfro, C. L. (2002). The role of threats in the racial attitudes of Blacks and Whites. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1242–1254.Google Scholar

Stephan, W. G., Renfro, C. L., & Davis, M. D. (2008). The role of threat in intergroup relations. In Wagner, U., Tropp, L. R., Finchilescu, G. & Tredoux, C. (Eds.), Improving intergroup relations: Building on the legacy of Thomas F. Pettigrew (pp. 55–72). Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (1985). Intergroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 157–175.Google Scholar

Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In Oskamp, S. (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination. The Claremont Symposium on applied social psychology (pp. 23–45). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Hogg, M. A. & Abrams, D. (Eds.), Intergroup relations (pp. 94–109). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Van Dyne, L., & Pierce, J. L. (2004). Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 439–459.Google Scholar

van Zomeren, M., Leach, C. W., & Spears, R. (2012). Protesters as “passionate economists”: A dynamic dual pathway model of approach coping with collective action. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 180–199.Google Scholar

Varjonen, S., Arnold, L., & Jasinskaja-Lahti, I. (2013). ‘We’re Finns here, and Russians there’: A longitudinal study on ethnic identity construction in the context of ethnic migration. Discourse and Society, 24, 110–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Verkuyten, M., & Martinovic, B. (2006). Understanding multicultural attitudes: The role of group status, identification, friendships, and justifying ideologies. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30, 1–18.Google Scholar

Verkuyten, M., Sierksma, J., & Martinovic, B. (2015). First arrival and collective land ownership: How children reason about who owns the land. Social Development, 24, 868–882.Google Scholar