Abzhanov, A., Protas, M. B., Grant, R., Grant, P. R., & Tabin, C. J. (2004). Bmp4 and morphological variation of beaks in Darwin’s finches. Science, 305, 1462–1465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Amati, D. & Shallice, T. (2007). On the emergence of modern humans. Cognition, 103, 358–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Berna, F., Goldberg, P., Horwitz, L. K., Brink, J., Holt, S., Bamford, M., & Chazan, M. (2012). Microstratigraphic evidence of in situ fire in the Acheulean strata of Wonderwerk Cave, Northern Cape province, South Africa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, E1215–E1220.Google ScholarPubMed

Campbell, D.T. (1960). Blind generation and selective retention in creative thought as in other thought processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carroll, J. (2004). Literary Darwinism: Literature and the human animal. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charrier, C., Joshi, K., Coutinho-Budd, J., Kim, J. E., Lambert, N., de Marchena, J., Jin, W. L., Vanderhaeghen, P., Ghosh, A., Sassa, T., & Polleux, F. (2012). Inhibition of SRGAP2 function by its human-specific paralogs induces neoteny during spine maturation. Cell, 149, 923–935.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clottes, J. (2003). Return to Chauvet cave. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar

Conard, N. J. (2009). A female figurine from the basal Aurignacian of Hohle Fels Cave in southwestern Germany. Nature, 459, 248–252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 325–339). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1993). The evolving self: A psychology for the third millennium. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Cupchik, G. C. (2016). The aesthetics of emotion: Up the down staircase of the mind-body. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species. London: John Murray.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. (1983). The extended phenotype. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. (1989). The evolution of evolvability. In Langton, C. G. (ed.), Artificial life: The proceedings of an interdisciplinary workshop on the synthesis and simulation of living systems (pp. 201–220). Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. (2004). The ancestor’s tale: A pilgrimage to the dawn of evolution. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. (2006). Universal Darwinism. In Bedau, M. A. and Cleland, C. E. (eds.), The nature of life: Classical and contemporary perspectives from philosophy and science (pp. 360–373). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin’s dangerous idea. New York: Penguin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dennis, M.Y., Nuttle, X., Sudmant, P. H., Antonacci, F., Graves, T. A., Nefedov, M., Rosenfeld, J. A., Sajjadian, S., Malig, M., Kotkiewicz, H., Curry, C. J., Shafer, S., Shaffer, L. G., de Jong, P. J., Wilson, R. K., Eichler, E. E. (2012). Evolution of human-specific neural SRGAP2 genes by incomplete segmental duplication. Cell, 149, 912–922.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dissanayake, E. (2007). What art is and what art does: An overview of contemporary evolutionary hypotheses. In Martindale, C., Locher, P., & Petrov, V. M. (eds.), Evolutionary and neurocognitive approaches to aesthetics, creativity, and the arts (pp. 1–14). Amityville, NY: Baywood.Google Scholar

Donald, M. (2006). Art and cognitive evolution. In Turner, M. (ed.), The artful mind: Cognitive science and the riddle of human creativity (pp. 3–20). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunbar, R. (1996). Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar

Dunbar, R. (1998). The social brain hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 6, 178–190.3.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ericsson, K. A. (1999). Creative expertise as superior reproducible performance: Innovative and flexible aspects of expert performance. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 329–333.Google Scholar

Falk, D. (1983). Cerebral cortices of East African early hominids. Science, 221, 1072–2074.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Feist, G. J. (2008). The psychology of science and the origins of the scientific mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Findlay, C. S. & Lumsden, C. J. (1988). The creative mind. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Fogarty, L., Creanza, N., & Feldman, M. W. (2015). Cultural evolutionary perspectives on creativity and human innovation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 30, 736–754.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Freeman, W. (2000). A neurobiological role of music in social bonding. In Wallin, N. L., Merkur, S., & Brown, S. (eds.), The origins of music (pp. 411–424). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Gabora, L. (2003). Contextual focus: A tentative cognitive explanation for the cultural transition of the middle/upper paleolithic. In Alterman, R. & Hirsch, D. (eds.), Proceedings of the 25th annual meeting of the cognitive science society, Boston, MA. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Gabora, L. (2005). Creative thought as a non-Darwinian evolutionary process. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39, 65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gabora, L. (2010). Revenge of the “neurds”: Characterizing creative thought in terms of the structure and dynamics of human memory. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gabora, L. & Kaufman, S. B. (2010). Evolutionary approaches to creativity. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (1st edn). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gamble, C., Gowlett, J., & Dunbar, R. (2011). The social brain and the shape of the paleolithic. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 21, 115–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geher, G. & Kaufman, S. B. (2013). Mating intelligence unleashed: The role of the mind in sex, love, and dating. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Geher, G. & Miller, G. (eds.). (2008). Mating intelligence: Sex, relationships, and the mind’s reproductive system. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. (1977). Ontogeny and phylogeny. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. & Eldredge, N. (1977). Punctuated equilibria: The tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered. Paleobiology, 3, 115–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gould, S. J. & Lewontin, R. C. (1979). The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 205, 581–598.Google Scholar

Greengross, G. & Miller, G. (2011). Humor ability reveals intelligence, predicts mating success, and is higher in males. Intelligence, 39, 188–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griskevicius, V., Cialdini, R. B., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Peacocks, Picasso, and parental investment: The effects of romantic motives on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 63–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gruber, H. E. (1981). Darwin on man: A psychological study of scientific creativity (rev. edn). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1974).Google Scholar

Gruber, H. E. & Wallace, D. B. (1999). The case study method and evolving systems approach for understanding unique creative people at work. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 93–115). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Guerrier, S., Coutinho-Budd, J., Sassa, T., Gresset, A., Jordan, N. V., Chen, K., Jin, W. L., Frost, A., & Polleux, F. (2009). The F-BAR domain of srGAP2 induces membrane protrusions required for neuronal migration and morphogenesis, Cell, 138, 990–1004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hall, B. K. (1999). Evolutionary developmental biology. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haselton, M. G. & Miller, G. F. (2006). Women’s fertility across the cycle increases the short-term attractiveness of creative intelligence. Human Nature, 17, 50–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Herculano-Houzel, S. (2016). The human advantage: A new understanding of how our brain became remarkable. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holloway, R. L., Yuan, M. S., & Broadfield, D.C. (2004). The human fossil record: Brain endocasts: The paleoneurological evidence. New York. John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Humphrey, N. K. (1976). The social function of intellect. In Bateson, P. P. G. & Hinde, R. A. (eds.), Growing points in ethology (pp. 303–317). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Huxley, J. (1942). Evolution: The modern synthesis. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Indriati, E., Swisher, C. C., Lepre, C., Quinn, R. L., & Suriyanto, R. A., et al. (2011). The age of the 20 meter solo river terrace, java, Indonesia and the survival of homo erectus in Asia. PLoS One, 6, E21562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Irons, W. (2001). Religion as a hard-to-fake sign of commitment. In Nesse, R. (ed.), Evolution and the capacity for commitment (pp. 292–309). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar

Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1993). Human and machine thinking. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Justus, T. & Hutsler, J. J. (2005). Fundamental issues in the evolutionary psychology of music: Assessing innateness and domain specificity. Music Perception, 23, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, J. C. & Kaufman, A. B. (2004). Applying a creativity framework to animal cognition. New Ideas in Psychology, 22, 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, S. B., Kozbelt, A., Silvia, P., Kaufman, J. C., Ramesh, S., & Feist, G. J. (2014). Who finds Bill Gates sexy? Creative mate preferences as a function of cognitive ability, personality, and creative achievement. Journal of Creative Behavior.Google Scholar

Keri, S. (2009). Genes for psychosis and creativity: A promoter polymorphism of the neuregulin 1 gene is related to creativity in people with high intellectual achievement. Psychological Science, 20, 1070–1073.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Klein, R. G. (1992). The archaeology of modern human origins. Evolutionary Anthropology, 1, 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kohn, M. & Mithen, S. (1999). Handaxes: Products of sexual selection? Antiquity, 73, 518–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kolodny, O., Creanza, N., & Feldman, M. W. (2015). Evolution in leaps: The punctuated accumulation and loss of cultural innovations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112, E6762–E6769.Google ScholarPubMed

Kozbelt, A. (2006). Dynamic evaluation of Matisse’s 1935 “Large Reclining Nude.” Empirical Studies of the Arts, 24, 119–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kozbelt, A. (2008). Longitudinal hit ratios of classical composers: Reconciling “Darwinian” and expertise acquisition perspectives on lifespan creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 221–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kozbelt, A. (2009a). Ontogenetic heterochrony and the creative process in visual art: A précis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, 35–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kozbelt, A. (2009b). The evolution of evolvability, applied to human creativity. International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 19, 101–121.Google Scholar

Kozbelt, A. (2015). Prospects for a literally universal science of aesthetics and creativity. International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 25, 21–34.Google Scholar

Kozbelt, A. (2017). Tensions in naturalistic, evolutionary explanations of aesthetic reception and production. New Ideas in Psychology, 47, 113–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kozbelt, A. (in press). Evolutionary explanations for humor and creativity. In Luria, S. R., Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (eds.), Creativity and humor. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Kozbelt, A. & Kaufman, J.C. (2014). Aesthetics assessment. In Smith, J. K. & Tinio, P. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of aesthetics (pp. 86–114). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lalande, K. N., Odling-Smee, J., & Miles, S. (2010). How culture shaped the human genome: Bringing genetics and the human sciences together. National Review, 11, 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lamarck, J. B. (1809). Philosophie zoologique. Paris: Museum d’Histoire Naturelle.Google Scholar

Leakey, M. D. (1971). Olduvai gorge: Excavations in beds I and II, 1960–1963. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lewin, R. & Foley, R. (2004). Principles of human evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Lewis-Williams, D. (2002). The mind in the cave. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar

Livio, M. (2017). Why?: What makes us curious. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Lumsden, C. J. & Wilson, E. O. (1981). Genes, mind, and culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Martindale, C. (1990). The clockwork muse: The predictability of artistic change. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Martindale, C. (2009). The evolution and end of art as Hegelian tragedy. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 27, 133–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McBrearty, S. & Brooks, A. S. (2000). The revolution that wasn’t: A new interpretation of the origin of modern human behavior. Journal of Human Evolution, 30, 453–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McPherron, S. P., Alemseged, Z., Marean, C. W., Wynn, J. G., Reed, D., Geraads, D., Bobe, R., & Bearat, H. A. (2010). Evidence for stone-tool-assisted consumption of animal tissues before 3.39 million years ago at Dikika, Ethiopia. Nature, 466, 857–860.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Miller, G. F. (2000a). Evolution of human music through sexual selection. In Wallin, N. L., Merker, B., & Brown, S. (eds.), The origins of music (pp. 329–360). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Miller, G. F. (2000b). The mating mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Miller, G. F. (2001). Aesthetic fitness: How sexual selection shaped artistic virtuosity as a fitness indicator and aesthetic preferences as mate choice criteria. Bulletin of Psychology and the Arts, 2, 20–25.Google Scholar

Mithen, S. (1996). The prehistory of the mind: The cognitive origins of art and science. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar

Morriss-Kay, G. M. (2010). The evolution of human artistic creativity. Journal of Anatomy, 216, 158–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nettle, D. & Clegg, H. (2006). Schizotypy, creativity and mating success in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 273, 611–615.Google ScholarPubMed

Orians, G. H. 2014. Snakes, sunrises, and Shakespeare. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pfeiffer, J. E. (1982). The creative explosion. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Piffer, D. & Hur, Y.-M. (2014). Heritability of creative achievement. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 151–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Pinker, S. (2002). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Purves, D. (2017). Music as biology: The tones we like and why. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ramachandran, V. S. & Hirstein., W. (1999). The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6, 15–51.Google Scholar

Rampley, M. (2017). The seductions of Darwin: Art, evolution, neuroscience. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar

Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. New York: Oxford Psychology Series.Google Scholar

Rothenberg, D. (2011). Survival of the beautiful: Art, science, and evolution. New York: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar

Ruff, C., Trinkaus, E., & Holliday, T. (1997). Body mass and encephalization in Pleistocene Homo. Nature, 387, 173–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1999). Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2011). Creativity and discovery as blind variation: Campbell’s (1960) BVSR model after the half-century mark. Review of General Psychology, 15, 158–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Cognitive mechanisms in creativity: Is variation blind or sighted? Journal of Creative Behavior, 32, 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In Barkow, J., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 19–136). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vartanian, O. (2015). Neuroimaging studies of making aesthetic products. In Huston, J. P, Nadal, M., Mora, F., Agnati, L.F., & Cela-Conde, C. J. (eds.), Art, aesthetics, and the brain (pp. 174–185). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Villmoare, B., Kimbel, H., Seyoum, C., Campisano, C., DiMaggio, E., Rowan, J., Braun, D., Arrowsmith, J., & Reed, K. (2015). Early homo at 2.8 Ma from Ledi-Geraru, Afar, Ethiopia. Science, 347, 1352–1355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Finke, R. A. (1999). Creative cognition. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 189–212). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Weisberg, R. W. (2004). On structure in the creative process: A quantitative case-study of the creation of Picasso’s Guernica. Empirical Studies in the Arts, 22, 23–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weisberg, R. W. (2006). Creativity: Understanding innovation in problem solving, science, invention, and the arts. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar

Wrangham, R. W. (2009). Catching fire: How cooking made us human. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bachner-Melman, R., Dina, C., Zohar, A. H., Constantini, N., Lerer, E., Hoch, S., … Ebstein, R. (2005). AVPR1a and SLC6A4 gene polymorphisms are associated with creative dance performance. PLoS Genetics, 1(3), e42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baer, J. & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Bridging generality and specificity: The amusement park theoretical (APT) model of creativity. Roeper Review, 27(3), 158–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barbot, B., Besançon, M., & Lubart, T. (2016). The generality-specificity of creativity: Exploring the structure of creative potential with EPoC. Learning and Individual Differences, 52, 178–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barbot, B., Lubart, T. I., & Besançon, M. (2016). “Peaks, slumps, and bumps”: Individual differences in the development of creativity in children and adolescents. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 151, 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barbot, B., Tan, M., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2013). The genetics of creativity: The generative and receptive sides of the creativity equation. In Vartanian, O., Bristol, A., & Kaufman, J. (eds.), The neuroscience of creativity (pp. 71–93). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barbot, B. & Tinio, P. P. (2015). Where is the “g” in “creativity”? A specialization differentiation hypothesis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barbot, B. & Webster, P. R. (2018). Creative thinking in music: Processes of children and adolescents. In Lubart, T. (ed.), The creative process: Perspectives from multiple domains (pp. 255–273). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50563-7_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnett, J. H., Jones, P. B., Robbins, T. W., & Müller, U. (2007). Effects of the catechol-O-methyltransferase Val158Met polymorphism on executive function: A meta-analysis of the Wisconsin card sort test in schizophrenia and healthy controls. Molecular Psychiatry, 12(5), 502–509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Silvia, P. J., & Schacter, D. L. (2016). Creative cognition and brain network dynamics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(2), 87–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Sommer, M., Arendasy, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). Intelligence, creativity, and cognitive control: The common and differential involvement of executive functions in intelligence and creativity. Intelligence, 46, 73–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boyd, B. (2005). Evolutionary theories of art. In Gottschall, J. & Wilson, D. S. (eds.), Literature and the human animal (pp. 147–176). Evanston, IL; Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Chen, H., Gu, X., Zhou, Y., Ge, Z., Wang, B., Siok, W. T., … Sun, Y. (2017). A genome-wide association study identifies genetic variants associated with mathematics ability. Scientific Reports, 7, 40365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chermahini, S. A. & Hommel, B. (2010). The (b) link between creativity and dopamine: Spontaneous eye blink rates predict and dissociate divergent and convergent thinking. Cognition, 115(3), 458–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, G., Tenesa, A., Payton, A., Yang, J., Harris, S. E., Liewald, D., … Deary, I. (2011). Genome-wide association studies establish that human intelligence is highly heritable and polygenic. Molecular Psychiatry, 16(10), 996–1005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Deary, I. J., Johnson, W., & Houlihan, L. M. (2009). Genetic foundations of human intelligence. Human Genetics, 126(1), 215–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Deary, I. J., Spinath, F. M., & Bates, T. C. (2006). Genetics of intelligence. European Journal of Human Genetics, 14(6), 690–700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

De Manzano, Ö., Cervenka, S., Karabanov, A., Farde, L., & Ullen, F. (2010). Thinking outside a less intact box: Thalamic dopamine D2 receptor densities are negatively related to psychometric creativity in healthy individuals. PLoS One, 5(5), e10670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Derringer, J., Krueger, R. F., Dick, D. M., Saccone, S., Grucza, R. A., Agrawal, A., … Bierut, L. J. (2010). Predicting sensation seeking from dopamine genes. A candidate-system approach. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1282–1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeYoung, C. G., Cicchetti, D., Rogosch, F. A., Gray, J. R., Eastman, M., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2011). Sources of cognitive exploration: Genetic variation in the prefrontal dopamine system predicts Openness/Intellect. Journal of Research in Personality, 45(4), 364–371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dissanayake, E. (2007). What art is and what art does: An overview of contemporary evolutionary hypotheses. In Martindale, C. (ed.), Evolutionary and neurocognitive approaches to aesthetics, creativity, and the arts (pp. 1–14). Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing.Google Scholar

Durstewitz, D. (2009). Implications of synaptic biophysics for recurrent network dynamics and active memory. Neural Networks, 22(8), 1189–1200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ebstein, R. P., Novick, O., Umansky, R., Priel, B., Osher, Y., Blaine, D. … Belmaker, R. H. (1996). Dopamine D4 receptor (D4DR) exon III polymorphism associated with the human personality trait of novelty seeking. Nature Genetics, 12(1), 78–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Feist, G. J. (2007). An evolutionary model of artistic and musical creativity. In Martindale, C., Locher, P., & Petrov, V. M. (eds.), Evolutionary and neurocognitive approaches to aesthetics, creativity, and the arts (pp. 15–30). Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing.Google Scholar

Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius. An inquiry into its laws and consequences. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garcia-Garcia, M., Barcelo, F., Clemente, I. C., & Escera, C. (2010). The role of the dopamine transporter DAT1 genotype on the neural correlates of cognitive flexibility. European Journal of Neuroscience, 31(4), 754–760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goldman, N., Glei, D.A., Lin, Y.H., & Weinstein, M. (2010). The serotonin transporter polymorphism (5-HTTLPR): Allelic variation and links with depressive symptoms. Depression and Anxiety, 27(3), 260–269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Guilford, J.P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Guilford, J.P., Christensen, P., Merrifield, P., & Wilson, R. (1978). Alternate uses: Manual of instructions and interpretation. Orange, CA: Sheridan Psychological Services.Google Scholar

Gutknecht, L., Jacob, C., Strobel, A., Kriegebaum, C., Müller, J., Zeng, Y. … Lesch, KP. (2007). Tryptophan hydroxylase-2 gene variation influences personality traits and disorders related to emotional dysregulation. The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 10(3), 309–320.Google ScholarPubMed

Heck, A., Lieb, R., Ellgas, A., Pfister, H., Lucae, S., Roeske, D. … Ising, M. (2009). Investigation of 17 candidate genes for personality traits confirms effects of the HTR2A gene on novelty seeking. Genes, Brain and Behavior, 8, 464–472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hill, W. D., Arslan, R. C., Xia, C., Luciano, M., Amador, C., Navarro, P. … & Penke, L. (2018). Genomic analysis of family data reveals additional genetic effects on intelligence and personality. Molecular Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-017-0005-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Irons, W. (2001). Religion as a hard-to-fake sign of commitment. In Nesse, R. M. (ed.), Evolution and the capacity for commitment (pp. 290–309). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Jagannath, V., Gerstenberg, M., Correll, C. U., Walitza, S., & Grünblatt, E. (2018). A systematic meta-analysis of the association of neuregulin 1 (NRG1), D-amino acid oxidase (DAO), and DAO activator (DAOA)/G72 polymorphisms with schizophrenia. Journal of Neural Transmission, 125(1), 89–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jiang, W., Shang, S., & Su, Y. (2015). Genetic influences on insight problem solving: The role of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) gene polymorphisms. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kéri, S. (2009). Genes for psychosis and creativity: A promoter polymorphism of the neuregulin 1 gene is related to creativity in people with high intellectual achievement. Psychological Science, 20(9), 1070–1073.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Laucht, M., Becker, K., & Schmidt, M. H. (2006). Visual exploratory behaviour in infancy and novelty seeking in adolescence: Two developmentally specific phenotypes of DRD4? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47(11), 1143–1151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Logue, S. F. & Gould, T. J. (2014). The neural and genetic basis of executive function: Attention, cognitive flexibility, and response inhibition. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 123, 45–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lumsden, C. J. & Wilson, E. O. (1981). Genes, mind, and ideology. The Sciences, 21(9), 6–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Markon, K. E., Krueger, R. F., & Watson, D. (2005). Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: An integrative hierarchical approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(1), 139–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mayseless, N., Uzefovsky, F., Shalev, I., Ebstein, R. P., & Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. (2013). The association between creativity and 7 R polymorphism in the dopamine receptor D4 gene (DRD4). Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, G. F. (2001). Aesthetic fitness: How sexual selection shaped artistic virtuosity as a fitness indicator and aesthetic preferences as mate choice criteria. Bulletin of Psychology and the Arts, 2(1), 20–25.Google Scholar

Murphy, M., Runco, M. A., Acar, S., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2013). Reanalysis of genetic data and rethinking dopamine’s relationship with creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 25(1), 147–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oikkonen, J., Kuusi, T., Peltonen, P., Raijas, P., Ukkola-Vuoti, L., Karma, K., … Järvelä, I. (2016). Creative activities in music–a genome-wide Linkage Analysis. PloS One, 11(2), e0148679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Oikkonen, J., Onkamo, P., Järvelä, I., & Kanduri, C. (2016). Convergent evidence for the molecular basis of musical traits. Scientific Reports, 6, 39707.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Park, H., Lee, S., Kim, H.-J., Ju, Y. S., Shin, J.-Y., Hong, D. … Seo, J. (2012). Comprehensive genomic analyses associate UGT8 variants with musical ability in a Mongolian population. Journal of Medical Genetics, 49(12), 747–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plomin, R. & Spinath, F. M. (2004). Intelligence: Genetics, genes, and genomics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(1), 112–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Power, R. A. & Pluess, M. (2015). Heritability estimates of the Big Five personality traits based on common genetic variants. Translational Psychiatry, 5(7), e604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pulli, K., Karma, K., Norio, R., Sistonen, P., Göring, H. H. H., & Järvelä, I. (2008). Genome-wide linkage scan for loci of musical aptitude in Finnish families: Evidence for a major locus at 4q22. Journal of Medical Genetics, 45(7), 451–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reuter, M., Roth, S., Holve, K., & Hennig, J. (2006). Identification of first candidate genes for creativity: A pilot study. Brain Research, 1069(1), 190–197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Runco, M. A., Dow, G., & Smith, W. R. (2006). Information, experience, and divergent thinking: An empirical test. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 269–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Runco, M. A., Noble, E. P., Reiter-Palmon, R., Acar, S., Ritchie, T., & Yurkovich, J. M. (2011). The genetic basis of creativity and ideational fluency. Creativity Research Journal, 23(4), 376–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schweizer, T. S. (2006). The psychology of novelty-seeking, creativity and innovation: Neurocognitive aspects within a work-psychological perspective. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15(2), 164–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silvia, P. J., Christensen, A. P., & Cotter, K. N. (2016). Commentary: The development of creativity – ability, motivation, and potential [Monograph]. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 115, 83–97.Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2003). Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product, person, and process perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 475–494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Spain, S. L., Pedroso, I., Kadeva, N., Miller, M. B., Iacono, W. G., McGue, M. … Simpson, M. (2016). A genome-wide analysis of putative functional and exonic variation associated with extremely high intelligence. Molecular Psychiatry, 21(8), 1145–1151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sternberg, R. J. & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Takeuchi, H., Taki, Y., Hashizume, H., Sassa, Y., Nagase, T., Nouchi, R., & Kawashima, R. (2012). The association between resting functional connectivity and creativity. Cerebral Cortex, 22(12), 2921–2929.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tan, Y. T., McPherson, G. E., Peretz, I., Berkovic, S. F., & Wilson, S. J. (2014). The genetic basis of music ability. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Theusch, E., Basu, A., & Gitschier, J. (2009). Genome-wide study of families with absolute pitch reveals linkage to 8q24. 21 and locus heterogeneity. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 85(1), 112–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Velázquez, J. A., Segal, N. L., & Horwitz, B. N. (2015). Genetic and environmental influences on applied creativity: A reared-apart twin study. Personality and Individual Differences, 75, 141–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Vinkhuyzen, A. A., Van der Sluis, S., Posthuma, D., & Boomsma, D. I. (2009). The heritability of aptitude and exceptional talent across different domains in adolescents and young adults. Behavior Genetics, 39(4), 380–392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Volf, N. V., Kulikov, A. V., Bortsov, C. U., & Popova, N. K. (2009). Association of verbal and figural creative achievement with polymorphism in the human serotonin transporter gene. Neuroscience Letters, 463(2), 154–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Walberg, H. J. (1988). Creativity and talent as learning. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 340–361). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wang, E., Ding, Y.-C., Flodman, P., Kidd, J. R., Kidd, K. K., Grady, D. L., … & Moyzis, R. K. (2004). The genetic architecture of selection at the human dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) gene locus. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 74(5), 931–944. https://doi.org/10.1086/420854CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Webster, P. (1994). Measure of creative thinking in music-II (MCTM-II): Administrative guidelines. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.Google Scholar

Zabelina, D. L., Colzato, L., Beeman, M., & Hommel, B. (2016). Dopamine and the creative mind: Individual differences in creativity are predicted by interactions between dopamine genes DAT and COMT. PloS One, 11(1), e0146768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Zabelina, D. L., O’Leary, D., Pornpattananangkul, N., Nusslock, R., & Beeman, M. (2015). Creativity and sensory gating indexed by the P50: Selective versus leaky sensory gating in divergent thinkers and creative achievers. Neuropsychologia, 69, 77–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Zald, D. H., Cowan, R. L., Riccardi, P., Baldwin, R. M., Ansari, M. S., Li, R. … Kessler, R. M. (2008). Midbrain dopamine receptor availability is inversely associated with novelty-seeking traits in humans. The Journal of Neuroscience, 28(53), 14372–14378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Zhang, S. & Zhang, J. (2017). The association of TPH genes with creative potential. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(1), 2–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhang, S., Zhang, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). An exploratory study on DRD2 and creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 26(1), 115–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abraham, A. (2014). Creative thinking as orchestrated by semantic processing vs. cognitive control brain networks. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(95). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00095CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Abraham, A. (2019). The neuropsychology of creativity. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 27, 71–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abraham, A., Beudt, S., Ott, D. V., & Yves von Cramon, D. (2012). Creative cognition and the brain: Dissociations between frontal, parietal-temporal and basal ganglia groups. Brain Research, 1482, 55–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Addis, D. R., Pan, L., Vu, M. A., Laiser, N., & Schacter, D. L. (2009). Constructive episodic simulation of the future and the past: Distinct subsystems of a core brain network mediate imagining and remembering. Neuropsychologia, 47, 2222–2238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Addis, D. R., Wong, A. T., & Schacter, D. L. (2007). Remembering the past and imagining the future: Common and distinct neural substrates during event construction and elaboration. Neuropsychologia, 45, 1363–1377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Amabile, T. M. (1983). Social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 997–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (2013). Componential theory of creativity. In Kessler, E. H. (ed.), Encyclopedia of management theory (pp. 135–139). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Arden, R., Chavez, R. S., Grazioplene, R., & Jung, R. E. (2010). Neuroimaging creativity: A psychometric view. Behavioural Brain Research, 214, 143–156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Aron, A. R., Fletcher, P. C., Bullmore, E. T., Sahakian, B. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2003). Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 115–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Aron, A. R., Robbins, T. W., & Poldrack, R. A. (2004). Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends Cognitive Sciences, 8, 170–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 829–839.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baer, J. (1998). The case for domain specificity in creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 173–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Kaufman, S. B., & Silvia, P. J. (2015). Default and executive network coupling supports creative idea production. Scientific Reports, 5(10964). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10964CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Silvia, P. J., & Schacter, D. L. (2016). Creative cognition and brain network dynamics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 87–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Wilkins, R. W., Jauk, E., Fink, A., Silvia, P. J., Hodges, D. A., Koschutnig, K., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). Creativity and the default network: A functional connectivity analysis of the creative brain at rest. Neuropsychologia, 64, 92–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Beaty, R. E., Kaufman, S. B., Benedek, M., Jung, R. E., Kenett, Y. N., Jauk, E., Neubauer, A. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2016). Personality and complex brain networks: The role of openness to experience in default network efficiency. Human Brain Mapping, 37, 773–779.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Beaty, R. E., Kenett, Y. N., Christensen, A. P., Rosenberg, M. D., Benedek, M., Chen, Q., Fink, A., Qiu, J., Kwapil, T. R., Kane, M. J., & Silvia, P. J. (2018). Robust prediction of individual creative ability from brain functional connectivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 115, 1087–1092.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bekhtereva, N. P., Starchenko, M. G., Klyucharev, V. A., Vorob’ev, V. A., Pakhomov, S. V., & Medvedev, S. V. (2000). Study of the brain organization of creativity: II. Positron-emission tomography data. Human Physiology, 26, 516–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benedek, M., Franz, F., Heene, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2012). Differential effects of cognitive inhibition and intelligence on creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 480–485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Sommer, M., Arendasy, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). Intelligence, creativity, and cognitive control: The common and differential involvement of executive functions in intelligence and creativity. Intelligence, 46, 73–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Benedek, M. & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). Revisiting Mednick’s model on creativity- related differences in associative hierarchies. Evidence for a common path to uncommon thought. Journal of Creative Behavior, 47, 273–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boccia, M., Piccardi, L., Palermo, L., Nori, R., & Palmiero, M. (2015). Where do bright ideas occur in our brain? Meta-analytic evidence from neuroimaging studies of domain-specific creativity. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(1195). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01195CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boden, M. A. (2013). Creativity as a neuroscientific mystery. In Vartanian, O., Bristol, A. S., & Kaufman, J. C. (eds.), Neuroscience of creativity (pp. 3–18). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bressler, S. & Menon, V. (2010). Large-scale brain networks in cognition: Emerging methods and principles. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 277–290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bunge, S. A., Helskog, E. H., & Wendelken, C. (2009). Left, but not right, rostrolateral prefrontal cortex meets a stringent test of the relational integration hypothesis. NeuroImage, 46, 338–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carlsson, I., Wendt, P. E., & Risberg, J. (2000). On the neurobiology of creativity. Differences in frontal activity between high and low creative subjects. Neuropsychologia, 38, 873–885.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carson, S. H. (2018). Creativity and psychopathology: A relationship of shared neurocognitive vulnerabilities. In Jung, R. E. & Vartanian, O. (eds.), Cambridge handbook of the neuroscience of creativity (pp. 136–157). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carter, C. S., Mintun, M., Nichols, T., & Cohen, J. D. (1997). Anterior cingulate gyrus dysfunction and selective attention deficits in schizophrenia: [15O]H2O PET study during single-trial Stroop task performance. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 1670–1675.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chan Barrett, K. & Limb, C. J. (2019). Unveiling artistic minds: Case studies of creativity. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 27, 84–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christoff, K., Prabhakaran, V., Dorfman, J., Zhao, Z., Kroger, J. K., Holyoak, K. J., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2001) Rostrolateral prefrontal cortex involvement in relational integration during reasoning. NeuroImage, 14, 1136–1149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chrysikou, E. G., Weber, M., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2014). A matched filter hypothesis for cognitive control. Neuropsychologia, 62, 341–355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chuderski, A. (2013). When are fluid intelligence and working memory isomorphic and when are they not? Intelligence, 41, 244–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cocchi, L., Zalesky, A., Fornito, A., & Mattingley, J. B. (2013). Dynamic cooperation and competition between brain systems during cognitive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 494–501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Crone, E. A., Wendelken, C., van Leijenhorst, L., Honomichl, R. D., Christoff, K., & Bunge, S. A. (2009). Neurocognitive development of relational reasoning. Developmental Science, 12, 55–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

De Pisapia, N., Bacci, F., Parrott, D., & Melcher, D. (2016). Brain networks for visual creativity: a functional connectivity study of planning a visual artwork. Scientific Reports, 6(39185). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39185CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

DeYoung, C. G. (2010). Personality neuroscience and the biology of traits. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(12), 1165–1180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: Ten aspects of the big five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 880–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dietrich, A. & Kanso, R. (2010). A review of EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies of creativity and insight. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 822–848.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dorfman, L., Martindale, C., Gassimova, V., & Vartanian, O. (2008). Creativity and speed of information processing: A double dissociation involving elementary versus inhibitory cognitive tasks. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1382–1390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Draganski, B., Gaser, C., Busch, V., Schuierer, G., Bogdahn, U., & May, A. (2004). Changes in grey matter induced by training. Nature, 427, 311–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dunbar, K. (1997). How scientists think: Online creativity and conceptual change in science. In Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Vaid, S. (eds.), Conceptual structures and processes: Emergence, discovery and change (pp. 461–493). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.Google Scholar

Ellamil, M., Dobson, C., Beeman, M., & Christoff, K. (2012). Evaluative and generative modes of thought during the creative process. Neuroimage, 59, 1783–1794.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Eysenck, H. J. (1993). Creativity and personality: Suggestions for a theory. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 147–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. (1995). Genius: The natural history of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of the impact of personality on scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feist, G. J. (1999). The influence of personality on artistic and scientific creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 273–296). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Feist, G. J. (2010). The function of personality in creativity. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 113–130). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferstl, E. C., Neumann, J., Bogler, C., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2008). The extended language network: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on text comprehension. Human Brain Mapping, 29, 581–593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fink, A., Koschutnig, K., Benedek, M., Reishofer, G., Ischebeck, A., Weiss, E. M., & Ebner, F. (2012). Stimulating creativity via the exposure to other people’s ideas. Human Brain Mapping, 33, 2603–2610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Galton, F. (1874). English men of science: Their nature and nurture. London: Macmillan & Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gentner, D. (1998). Analogy. In Bechtel, W. & Graham, G. (eds.), A companion to cognitive science (pp. 107–113). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Gentner, D., Bowdle, B. Wolff, P., & Boronat, C. (2001). Metaphor is like analogy. In Gentner, D., Holyoak, K. J., & Kokinov, B. (eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 199–253). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilhooly, K. J., Fioratou, E., Anthony, S. H., & Wynn, V. (2007). Divergent thinking: Strategies and executive involvement in generating novel uses for familiar objects. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 611–625.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Glucksberg, S. (2003). The psycholinguistics of metaphor. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 92–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goel, V. (2007). Anatomy of deductive reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 435–441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goff, K. & Torrance, E. P. (2002). Abbreviated Torrance Test for adults manual. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.Google Scholar

Gonen-Yaacovi, G., de Souza, L. C., Levy, R., Urbanski, M., Josse, G., & Volle, E. (2013). Rostral and caudal prefrontal contribution to creativity: A meta-analysis of functional imaging data. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7(465). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00465CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Green, A. E., Kraemer, D. J., Fugelsang, J. A., Gray, J. R., & Dunbar, K. N. (2012). Neural correlates of creativity in analogical reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 264–272.Google ScholarPubMed

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts (Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Haier, R. J., Jung, R. E., Yeo, R. A., Head, K., Alkire, M. T. (2005). The neuroanatomy of general intelligence: Sex matters. Neuroimage, 25, 320–327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Horn, J. L., & Cattell, R. B. (1966). Refinement and test of the theory of fluid and crystallized general intelligences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 57, 253–270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Horn, J. L., & Cattell, R. B. (1967). Age differences in fluid and crystallized intelligence. Acta Psychologica, 26, 107–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Japardi, K., Bookheimer, S., Knudsen, K., Ghahremani, D. G., & Bilder, R. M. (2018). Functional magnetic resonance imaging of divergent and convergent thinking in Big-C creativity. Neuropsychologia, 118, 59–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jauk, E., Benedek, M., Dunst, B., & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). The relationship between intelligence and creativity: New support for the threshold hypothesis by means of empirical breakpoint detection. Intelligence, 41, 212–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy. In John, O. P., Robbins, R. W., & Pervin, L. A. (eds.), Personality handbook: Theory and research (pp. 114–158). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar

Jung, R. E., Gasparovic, C., Chavez, R. S., Flores, R. A., Smith, S. M., Caprihan, A., & Yeo, R. A. (2009). Biochemical support for the “threshold” theory of creativity: A magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 5319–5325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jung, R. E., Grazioplene, R., Caprihan, A., Chavez, R. S., Haier, R. J. (2010). White matter integrity, creativity, and psychopathology: disentangling constructs with diffusion tensor imaging. PLoS One, 5, e9818.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jung, R. E., Mead, B. S., Carrasco, J. & Flores, R. A. (2013). The structure of creative cognition in the human brain. Frontiers in Human Neurosciences, 7(330).Google ScholarPubMed

Jung, R. E., Segall, J. M., Jeremy Bockholt, H., Flores, R. A., Smith, S., Chavez, R. S., & Haier, R. J. (2010). Neuroanatomy of creativity. Human Brain Mapping, 31, 398–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jung, R. E., & Vartanian, O. (eds.). (2018). The Cambridge handbook of the neuroscience of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., & Engle, R. W. (2004). The generality of working memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 189–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kaufman, J. C. & Baer, J. (eds.). (2005). Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, J. C. & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, A. B., Kornilov, S. A., Bristol, A. S., Tan, M., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2010). The neurobiological foundation of creative cognition. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 216–232). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenett, Y. N., Anaki, D., & Faust, M. (2014). Investigating the structure of semantic networks in low and high creative persons. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(407). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00407CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kenett, Y. N., Levy, O., Kenett, D. Y., Stanley, H. E., Faust, M., & Havlin, S. (2018). Flexibility of thought in high creative individuals represented by percolation analysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 115, 867–872.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Killeen, P. R. (2001). The four causes of behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 136–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kim, K. H. (2005). Can only intelligent people be creative? Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16, 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kris, E. (1952). Psychoanalytic explorations in art. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar

Kyaga, S. (2018). A heated debate: Time to address the underpinnings of the association between creativity and psychopathology? In Jung, R. E. & Vartanian, O. (eds.), Cambridge handbook of the neuroscience of creativity (pp. 114–135). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Limb, C. J. & Braun, A. R. (2008). Neural substrates of spontaneous musical performance: an FMRI study of jazz improvisation. PLoS One, 3, e1679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Liu, S., Erkkinen, M. G., Healey, M. L., Xu, Y., Swett, K. E., Chow, H. M., & Braun, A. R. (2015). Brain activity and connectivity during poetry composition: toward a multidimensional model of the creative process. Human Brain Mapping, 36, 3351–3372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lotze, M., Erhard, K., Neumann, N., Eickhoff, S. B., & Langner, R. (2014). Neural correlates of verbal creativity: differences in resting-state functional connectivity associated with expertise in creative writing. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(516). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00516CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Madore, K. P., Addis, D. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2015). Creativity and memory effects of an episodic-specificity induction on divergent thinking. Psychological Science, 26, 1461–1468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Madore, K. P., Jing, H. G., & Schacter, D. L. (2016). Divergent creative thinking in young and older adults: Extending the effects of an episodic specificity induction. Memory and Cognition, 44, 974–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martindale, C. (1999). Biological bases of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 137–152). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Martindale, C. (2007). Creativity, primordial cognition, and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1777–1785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mashal, N., Faust, M., Hendler, T., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2007). An fMRI investigation of the neural correlates underlying the processing of novel metaphorical expressions. Brain and Language, 100, 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mendelsohn, G. A. (1976). Associative and attentional processes in creative performance. Journal of Personality, 44, 341–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Menon, V. & Uddin, L. Q. (2010). Saliency, switching, attention and control: A network model of insula function. Brain Structure and Function, 214, 655–667.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nusbaum, E. C. & Silvia, P. J. (2011). Are intelligence and creativity really so different? Fluid intelligence, executive processes, and strategy use in divergent thinking. Intelligence, 39, 36–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ovando-Tellez, M. P., Bieth, T., Bernard, M., & Volle, M. (2019). The contribution of the lesion approach to the neuroscience of creative cognition. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 27, 100–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pinho, A. L., Ullén, F., Castelo-Branco, M., Fransson, P., & de Manzano, Ö. (2016). Addressing a paradox: dual strategies for creative performance in introspective and extrospective networks. Cerebral Cortex, 26, 3052–3063.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Shah, C., Erhard, K., Ortheil, H. J., Kaza, E., Kessler, C., & Lotze, M. (2013). Neural correlates of creative writing: an fMRI Study. Human Brain Mapping, 34, 1088–1101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Silvia, P. J. (2008). Creativity and intelligence revisited: A reanalysis of Wallach and Kogan (1965). Creativity Research Journal, 20, 34–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1999). Significant samples: The psychological study of eminent individuals. Psychological Methods, 4, 425–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2001). The psychology of creativity: A historical perspective. Presentation given at the Green College Lecture Series on The nature of creativity: History, biology, and socio-cultural dimensions, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C.Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2010). Creative thought as blind-variation and selective-retention: Combinatorial models of exceptional creativity. Physics of Life Reviews, 7, 156–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Simonton, D. K. (2014). Significant samples – Not significance tests! The often overlooked solution to the replication problem. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 11–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2018). Creative ideas and the creative process: Good news and bad news for the neuroscience of creativity. In Jung, R. E. & Vartanian, O. (eds.), Cambridge handbook of the neuroscience of creativity (pp. 9–18). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stephan, K. E., Penny, W. D., Moran, R. J., den Ouden, H. E., Daunizeau, J., & Friston, K. J. (2010). Ten simple rules for dynamic causal modeling. NeuroImage, 49, 3099–3109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sternberg, R. J. (1977). Component processes in analogical reasoning. Psychological Review, 84, 353–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (1980). Sketch of a componential subtheory of human intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 573–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (ed.). (1999). Handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Storm, B. C., Angello, G., & Bjork, E. L. (2011). Thinking can cause forgetting: Memory dynamics in creative problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1287–1293.Google ScholarPubMed

Szpunar, K. K., Watson, J. M., & McDermott, K. B. (2007). Neural substrates of envisioning the future. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 642–647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Takeuchi, H., & Kawashima, R. (2018). Structural studies of creativity measured by divergent thinking. In Jung, R. E. & Vartanian, O. (eds.), Cambridge handbook of the neuroscience of creativity (pp. 451–463). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Uddin, L. Q. (2015). Salience processing and insular cortical function and dysfunction. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16, 55–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Vartanian, O. (2009). Variable attention facilitates creative problem solving. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, 57–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vartanian, O. (2011). Brain and neuropsychology. In Runco, M. & Pritzker, S. (eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (2nd edn, pp. 164–169). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Vartanian, O. (2012). Dissociable neural systems for analogy and metaphor: Implications for the neuroscience of creativity. British Journal of Psychology, 103, 302–316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Vartanian, O. (2015). Neuroimaging studies of making aesthetic products. In Nadal, M. R., Huston, J. P., Agnati, L., Mora, F., & Cela-Conde, J. (eds.), Art, aesthetics and the brain (pp. 174–185). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vartanian, O. (2018). Openness to experience: Insights from personality neuroscience. In Jung, R. E. & Vartanian, O. (eds.), Cambridge handbook of the neuroscience of creativity (pp. 464–475). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vartanian, O., Beatty, E. L., Smith, I., Blackler, K., Lam, Q., & Forbes, S. (2018). One-way traffic: The inferior frontal gyrus controls brain activation in the middle temporal gyrus and inferior parietal lobule during divergent thinking. Neuropsychologia, 118, 68–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Vartanian, O., Bristol, A. S., & Kaufman, J. C. (eds.). (2013). Neuroscience of creativity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vartanian, O. & Goel, V. (2005). Task constraints modulate activation in right ventral lateral prefrontal cortex. Neuroimage, 27, 927–933.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Vartanian, O. & Mandel, D. R. (2012). Neural bases of judgment and decision making. Dhami, M. K., Schlottmann, A., & Waldmann, M. (eds.), Judgment and decision making as a skill: Learning, development, and evolution (pp. 29–52). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Vartanian, O., Martindale, C., & Kwiatkowski, J. (2007). Creative potential, attention, and speed of information processing. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1470–1480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waltz, J. A., Knowlton, B. J., Holyoak, K. J., Boone, K. B., Mishkin, F. S., de Menenzes Santos, M., Thomas, C. R., & Miller, B. L. (1999). A system for relational reasoning in human prefrontal cortex. Psychological Science, 10, 119–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wu, X., Yang, W., Tong, D., Sun, J., Chen, Q., Wei, D., Zhang, Q., Zhang, M., & Qiu, J. (2015). A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on divergent thinking using activation likelihood estimation. Human Brain Mapping, 36, 2703–2718.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Zabelina, D. L. & Andrews-Hanna, J. (2016). Dynamic network interactions supporting internally-oriented cognition. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 40, 86–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Zabelina, D. L., O’Leary, D., Pornpattananangkul, N., Nusslock, R., & Beeman, M. (2015). Creativity and sensory gating indexed by the P50: Selective versus leaky sensory gating in divergent thinkers and creative achievers. Neuropsychologia, 69, 77–84.Google ScholarPubMed

Zabelina, D. L. & Robinson, M. D. (2010). Creativity as flexible cognitive control. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4, 136–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zabelina, D. L., Saporta, A., & Beeman, M. (2016). Flexible or leaky attention in creative people? Distinct patterns of attention for different types of creative thinking. Memory and Cognition, 44, 488–498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to “The social psychology of creativity.” Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1983). Social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashcraft, M. H. (1978). Property norms for typical and atypical items from 17 categories: A description and discussion. Memory and Cognition, 6(3), 227–232. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197450CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barlowe, W. D. & Summers, I. (1979). Barlowe’s guide to extraterrestrials. New York: Workman Publishing.Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. W. (1983). Ad hoc categories. Memory and Cognition, 11, 211–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barsalou, L. W. (1991). Deriving categories to achieve goals. In Bower, G. H. (ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 27, pp. 1–64). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Basadur, M. (1994). Managing the creative process in organizations. In Runco, M.A. (ed.), Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity (pp. 237–268). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Basalla, G. (1988). The evolution of technology. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Silvia, P. J., & Schacter, D. L. (2016). Creative cognition and brain network dynamics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.10.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Becker, A. H. & Ward, T. B. (1991). Children’s use of shape in extending novel labels to animate objects: Identity versus postural change. Cognitive Development, 6, 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bredart, S., Ward, T. B., & Marczewski, P. (1998). Structured imagination of novel creatures’ faces. American Journal of Psychology, 111, 607–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Browne, B. A. & Cruse, D. F. (1988). The incubation effect: Illusion or illumination? Human Performance, 1(3), 177–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cacciari, C., Levorato, M. C., & Cicogna, P. (1997). Imagination at work: Conceptual and linguistic creativity in children. In Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Vaid, J. (eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 145–177). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cardoso, C. & Badke-Schaub, P. (2011). The influence of different pictorial representations during idea generation. Journal of Creative Behavior, 45(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01092.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chan, J., Fu, K., Schunn, C., Cagan, J., Wood, K., & Kotovsky, K. (2011). On the benefits and pitfalls of analogies for innovative design: Ideation performance based on analogical distance, commonness, and modality of examples. Journal of Mechanical Design, 133, 081004. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4004396CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chan, J. & Schunn, C. (2015a). The impact of analogies on creative concept generation: Lessons from an in vivo study in engineering design. Cognitive Science, 39, 126–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12127CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chan, J. & Schunn, C. (2015b). The importance of iteration in creative conceptual combination. Cognition, 145, 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.08.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cheng, P., Mugge, R., & Schoormans, J. P. (2014). A new strategy to reduce design fixation: Presenting partial photographs to designers. Design Studies, 35(4), 374–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2014.02.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christensen, B.T. & Schunn, C.D. (2005). Spontaneous access and analogical incubation effects. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 207–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christensen, B.T. & Schunn, C.D. (2007). The relationship of analogical distance to analogical function and pre-inventive structure: The case of engineering design. Memory and Cognition, 35, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chrysikou, E. G. & Weisberg, R. W. (2005). Following the wrong footsteps: Fixation effects of pictorial examples in a design problem-solving task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(5), 1134–1148.Google Scholar

Chua, R. Y. J., Yannig, , & Lemoine, J. F. (2014). The impact of culture on creativity: How cultural tightness and cultural distance affect global innovation crowdsourcing work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60, 189–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cockbain, J., Vertolli, M. O., & Davies, J. (2014). Creative imagination is stable across technological media: The spore creature creator versus pencil and paper. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 48(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.38CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cropley, A. J. (1999). Creativity and cognition: Producing effective novelty. Roeper Review, 21(4), 253–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cropley, D. & Cropley, A. (2010). Functional creativity: “Products” and the generation of effective novelty. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (eds.). The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 301–317), New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crouch, T. D. (1992). Why Wilbur and Orville? Some thoughts on the Wright brothers and the process of invention. In Weber, R. J. & Perkins, D. N. (eds.), Inventive minds (pp. 80–92), London: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313–335). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Getzels, J. W. (1971). Discovery-oriented behavior and the originality of creative products: A study with artists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19, 47–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dahl, D. & Moreau, P. (2002). The influence and value of analogical thinking during new product ideation. Journal of Marketing Research, 39, 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Cruz, H. (2013). Religious concepts as structured imagination. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 23(1), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2013.735495CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Cruz, H. & De Smedt, J. (2010). Science as structured imagination. Journal of Creative Behavior, 44, 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dodds, R. A., Smith, S. M., & Ward, T. B. (2002). The use of environmental clues during incubation. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 287–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar