Allende, Salvador. Mensaje al Congreso Nacional. Santiago, Chile, 1971.Google Scholar

Amin, Samir. Accumulation on a World Scale: A Critique of the Theory of Underdevelopment. Translated by Pearce, Brian. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Baer, Werner and Love, Joseph L., “Brazil’s EMBRAER: Institutional Entrepreneurship.” In Brazil’s Economy: An Institutional and Sectoral Approach, eds. Bauer, Werner et al., London: Routledge, 2017: 119–135.Google Scholar

Baer, Werner and Love, Joseph L., eds. Liberalization and its Consequences: A Comparative Perspective on Latin America and Eastern Europe. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bértola, Luis and Ocampo, José Antonio. The Economic Development of Latin America since Independence. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Bourguignon, François. The Globalization of Inequality. Translated by Railton, Thomas Scott. Princeton University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Bulmer-Thomas, Victor, Coatsworth, John, and Cortes-Conde, Roberto, eds. Cambridge History of Latin America. Vol. 2: The Long Twentieth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Cano, Wilson. “Instituto de Economia da Unicamp: Notas Sobre sua Origem e Linhas Gerais de sua Evolução.” In Ensaios de História do Pensamento Econômico no Brasil Contemporâneo, eds. Szmrecsányi, Tamás and Da Silva Coelho, Francisco, São Paulo: Atlas, 2007: 199–209.Google Scholar

Cárdenas, Enrique, Ocampo, José Antonio, and Thorp, Rosemary, eds. An Economic History of Twentieth-Century Latin America. Vol. 3: Industrialization and the State in Latin America: The Postwar Years. New York: Palgrave, 2000.Google Scholar

Cardoso, Fernando Henrique. Empresário Industrial e Desenvolvimento Econômico no Brasil. São Paulo: Difusão Européia do Livro, 1964.Google Scholar

CELAM. “II Conferencia General del Episcopado Latinoamericano. Documentos Finales de Medellin.” 2017 www.celam.org/doc_conferencias/Documento_Conclusivo_Medellin.pdf (accessed December 2, 2017).Google Scholar

Coatsworth, John H. and Williamson, Jeffrey G.. “Always Protectionist? Latin American Tariffs from Independence to the Great Depression.” Journal of Latin American Studies, May , 2014: 205–232.Google Scholar

David, Thomas. Nationalisme économique et industrialization: L’expérience des pays de l’Est (1789–1939). Genève: Librairie Droz, 2009.Google Scholar

Dosman, Edgar J. The Life and Times of Raúl Prebisch. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC; Fernando Fajnzylber, principal author). Changing Production Patterns with Social Equity. Santiago, Chile: United Nations, 1990.Google Scholar

Fajnzylber, Fernando. La industrialización trunca de América Latina. México, DF: Nueva Imagen, 1983.Google Scholar

Fajnzylber, Fernando. “Industrialización en América Latina: De la ‘caja negra’ al ‘casillero vacío.’ Comparación de patrones contemporáneos de industrialización.” Cuadernos de la CEPAL No. 60. Santiago de Chile: Naciones Unidas – CEPAL, 1990. https://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/27955 (accessed April 25, 2018).Google Scholar

Fernandez, Joaquin. “Neoestructuralismo y política económica: Entrevista a Osvaldo Sunkel.” Revista de Actualidad Política, Social y Cultural. 2011. www.redseca.cl/?p=2015 (accessed December 3, 2017).Google Scholar

Filippo, Armando di. Desarrollo y desigualdad social en la América Latina. México, DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1981.Google Scholar

Filippo, Armando di. “La visión centro-periferia hoy.” Revista de la CEPAL, número extraordinario, October 1998: 175–185.Google Scholar

Foxley, Alejandro. Distribución del Ingreso. México, DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1974.Google Scholar

Foxley, Alejandro and Óscar, Muñoz. “Redistribución del Ingreso, Crecimiento Económico y Estructura Social (El caso chileno).” El Trimestre Económico 40, 160(4): 905–936, Octubre–Diciembre 1973.Google Scholar

Franco, Rolando. “História del ILPES (1962–2012).” Unpublished manuscript. 2015.Google Scholar

Furtado, Celso. Diagnosis of the Brazilian Crisis. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1965. [Portuguese original: Dialéctica do desenvolvimento, 1964.]Google Scholar

Furtado, Celso. A Fantasia Desfeita. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1989.Google Scholar

Furtado, Celso. Letter to Love, Joseph L.. Author’s possession, Rio de Janeiro. August 8, 1996.Google Scholar

Graham, Lawrence. Civil Service Reform in Brazil: Principles versus Practice. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Helpman, Elhanan. The Mystery of Economic Growth. Harvard: Belknap, 2004.Google Scholar

Hirschman, Albert O. Journeys Toward Progress: Studies of Economic Policy-making in Latin America. New York: Twentieth Century Fund, 1963.Google Scholar

Hopkins, Jack W. “Evolution and Revolution: Enduring Patterns and the Transformation of Latin American Bureaucracy.” In Handbook of Comparative and Development Public Administration, ed. Farazmand, Ali, New York: Marcel Dekker, 1991: 705–706.Google Scholar

Hopkins, Jack W. “Contemporary Research on Public Administration and Bureaucracies in Latin America.” LARR (IX, 1), Spring 1974.Google Scholar

Instituto Latinoamericano de Planificación Económica y Social (ILPES), “Programa de Capacitación 1963 [through 1969].” ILPES Archive, CEPAL, 1969.Google Scholar

Instituto Latinoamericano de Planificación Económica y Social (ILPES), Discusiones sobre Planificación: Informe de un seminario. Santiago, 6–14 de Julio de 1965. México: Siglo XXI, 1990 (1st edn. 1976).Google Scholar

Kubitschek, Juscelino. Mensagem ao Congresso Nacional: 1956. Rio de Janeiro: Imprensa Nacional, 1956.Google Scholar

Larrain, Felipe and Selowsky, Marcelo, eds. The Public Sector and the Latin American Crisis. San Francisco, CA: ICS Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Leiva, Fernando Ignacio. Latin American Neostructuralism: The Contradictions of Post-Neoliberal Development. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Love, Joseph L. “The Origins of Dependency Analysis.” Journal of Latin American Studies 22, 1: 143–168, February 1990.Google Scholar

Love, Joseph L. Crafting the Third World: Theorizing Development in Romania and Brazil. Stanford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Love, Joseph L. “Structuralism and Dependency in Peripheral Europe: Latin American Ideas in Spain and Portugal.” Latin American Research Review 39, 2, June 2004: 114–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Love, Joseph L. “Institutional Foundations of Economic Ideas in Latin America, 1914–1950.” In Economic Doctrines in Latin America: Origins, Embedding and Evolution, eds. Thorp, Rosemary and Fitzgerald, Valpy, Houndmills, UK: Palgrave, 2005: 142–156.Google Scholar

Love, Joseph L. “Flux and Reflux: Interwar and Postwar Structuralist Theories of Development in Romania and Latin America.” In History and Culture of Economic Nationalism in East-Central Europe, eds. Helga Schultz and Eduard Kubu, Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, 2006: 71–86. “Latin America, UNCTAD, and the Postwar Trading System.” In Economic Development in Latin America: Essays in Honor of Werner Baer, eds. Esfahani, Hadi Salehi, Facchini, Giovanni, and Hewings, Geoffrey, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010: 22–33.Google Scholar

Montecinos, Veronica. “Economists in Political and Policy Elites in Latin America.” In The Post-1945 Internationalization of Economics, ed. Coats, A. W. Durham: Duke University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Nye, Joseph S. “UNCTAD: Poor Nations’ Pressure Group.” In The Anatomy of Influence: Decision Making in International Organizations, eds. Cox, Robert W. and Karan, Jacobson Harold, New Haven, Connecticut, 1973: 334.Google Scholar

Ocampo, José Antonio and Parra, María Ángela. “Returning to An Eternal Debate: The Terms of Trade for Commodities in the Twentieth Century.” CEPAL, series Informes y estudios especiales 5, 2003: 1–56.Google Scholar

Packenham, Robert A. The Dependency Movement: Scholarship and Politics in Development Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Pinto, Aníbal. “Naturaleza e implicaciones de la ‘heterogeneidad estructural’ de la América Latina.” El Trimestre Económico 37, 1, 145, 1970: 83–100.Google Scholar

Pinto, Aníbal. América Latina: una visión estructuralista. México, DF: UNAM, 1991 [1974].Google Scholar

Porcile, Gabriel. “La teoría estructuralista del desarrollo.” In El desarrollo inclusivo en América Latina y el Caribe: Ensayos sobre políticas de convergencia productiva para la igualdad, ed. Infante, Ricardo, Santiago: CEPAL, 2011: 31–64.Google Scholar

Prado, Eleuterio F. S. “A ortodoxia neoclássica.” USP: Estudos Avançados 15, 41, January/April 2001.Google Scholar

Prebisch, Raúl. Towards a Dynamic Development Policy for Latin America. New York: United Nations, 1963.Google Scholar

Prebisch, Raúl. Towards a New Trade Policy for Development. New York: UNCTAD, 1964.Google Scholar

Prebisch, Raúl. Towards a Global Strategy of Development. New York: UNCTAD, 1968.Google Scholar

Presidência da República [Celso Furtado, principal author]. Plano trienal de desenvolvimento econômico e social: 1963–1965 (Síntese). Rio: n. pub, December 1962.Google Scholar

Rodriguez, Octavio. El Estructuralismo latinoamericano. México, DF: Siglo XXI and CEPAL, 2006.Google Scholar

Stiglitz, Joseph E. The Price of Inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers Our Future. New York: Norton, 2013.Google Scholar

Sunkel, Osvaldo and Zuleta, Gustavo. “Neostructuralism vs. Neoliberalism in the 1990s.” CEPAL Review 42: 35–52, 1990.Google Scholar

Szlajfer, Henryk. Economic Nationalism in East-Central Europe and South America (1918–1939). Genève: Librairie Droz, 1990.Google Scholar

Thirion, Gerard. “The Birth of PREALC (1968–1973).” In PREALC: 25 Years. Santiago: International Labour Organization, 1993.Google Scholar

Thorp, Rosemary. Progress, Poverty, and Exclusion: An Economic History of Latin America in the Twentieth Century. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank, 1998.Google Scholar

Thurber, Clarence E., Boeninger, Edgardo and Graham, Lawrence S., eds. Development Administration in Latin America. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1973.Google Scholar

United Nations. Economic Development in Selected Countries: Plans, Programmes and Agencies. Lake Success, NY: UN Department of Economic Affairs, 1947.Google Scholar

Bravo, Pedro Vuskovic. “Distribucion del ingreso y opciones del desarrollo.” In Desarrollo latinoamericano: Ensayos críticos, ed. Serra, José. Mexico, DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1974: 51–74.Google Scholar

Wahrlich, Beatriz M. de Souza. Reforma administrativa na era de Vargas. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Getúlio Vargas, 1983.Google Scholar

Whitehead, Laurence. “State Organization in Latin America since 1930.” In Cambridge History of Latin America, Vol. VI, Part 2, ed. Bethell, Leslie, Cambridge University Press, 1994: 1–96.Google Scholar

Williamson, Jeffrey G. Trade and Poverty: When the Third World Fell Behind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Woods, Ngaire. The Globalizers: The IMF, the World Bank, and their Borrowers. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Ricardo, Bielschowsky. “Cincuenta años del pensamiento de la CEPAL: una reseña.” In Cincuenta años del pensamiento de la CEPAL: textos seleccionados. Vol. I, eds. Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe / Naciones Unidas, Santiago: CEPAL and Fondo de Cultura Economica, 1998: 9–61.Google Scholar

Ricardo, Bielschowsky. “Sesenta Años de la CEPAL y el pensamiento reciente.” In Sesenta años de la CEPAL: Textos seleccionados del decenio 1998–2008, ed. Ricardo, Bielschowsky, Buenos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno/CEPAL, 2010: 15–89.Google Scholar

Brown, Jonathan C. “Introduction, From Structuralism to the New Institutional Economics: A Half-Century of Latin American Economic Historiography.” Latin American Research Review 40:3, 2005: 97–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coatsworth, John H. “Structures, Endowments, and Institutions in the Economic History of Latin America.” Latin American Research Review 40, 3, 2005, 126–144.Google Scholar

Kuntz Ficker, Sandra. “From Structuralism to the New Institutional Economics: The Impact of Theory on the Study of Foreign Trade in Latin America.” Latin American Research Review 40, 3, 2005: 145–162.Google Scholar

Love, Joseph L. “The Rise and Decline of Economic Structuralism in Latin America: New Dimensions.” Latin American Research Review 40, 3, 2005: 100–125.Google Scholar

Love, Joseph L. “Brazilian Structuralism.” In Amann, Edmund, Carlos, Azzoni, and Bauer, Werner, The Oxford Handbook of the Brazilian Economy. Oxford University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar

Adelman, Jeremy and Fajardo, Margarita. “Between Capitalism and Democracy: A Study in the Political Economy of Ideas in Latin America, 1968–1980.” Latin American Research Review, 51, 3 (2016): 3–22.Google Scholar

Ahumada, Jorge En vez de la miseria. Santiago: Editorial del Pacífico, 1958.Google Scholar

Altamirano, Carlos, ed. Historia de los intelectuales en América Latina: Los avatares de la “ciudad letrada” en el siglo XX. 2 vols., vol. II. Buenos Aires: Katz Editores, 2010.Google Scholar

Arruda, Maria Arminda “A Sociologia no Brasil: Florestan Fernandes e a ‘escola paulista.’” In História das Ciências Sociais no Brasil, ed. Miceli, Sergio. São Paulo: Editora Sumaré; IDESP, 1995.Google Scholar

Babb, Sarah Managing Mexico: Economists from Nationalism to Neoliberalism.Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Boianovsky, Mauro. “Celso Furtado and the Structuralist-Monetarist Debate on Economic Stabilization in Latin America.” History of Political Economy, 44, 2 (2012): 277–329.Google Scholar

Boianovsky, Mauro and Solís, Ricardo. “The Origins and Development of the Latin American Structuralist Approach to the Balance of Payments (1944–1964).” Review of Political Economy, 26, 1 (2014): 23–59.Google Scholar

Campos, Roberto de Oliveira. “Projeto de acôrdo sobre coordenação de pesquisas entre o Banco Nacional do Desenvolvimento Economico e a Comissão Econômica da America Latina.” Roberto de Oliveira Campos to Dr. J.S. Maciel Filho, Rio de Janeiro, 29 de Setembro, 1952. Roberto Campos, Rio de Janeiro, Centro de Pesquisa e Documentação de História Contemporânea do Brasil, Fundação Getulio Vargas, RC e bnde 1952.09.29, pasta I, doc. 1, 1952.Google Scholar

Cardoso, Fernando Henrique Empresariado industrial e desenvolvimento no Brasil. São Paulo: Difusão Europeia do Livro, 1964.Google Scholar

Cardoso, Fernando Henrique “Hegemonia Burguesa e Independência Econômica: Raízes Estruturais da Crise Política Brasileira.” In O Brasil: Tempos Modernos, ed. Furtado, Celso. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 1968.Google Scholar

CEPAL. “Estudio Económico de América Latina, 1949.” New York, 1950.Google Scholar

CEPAL “Estudio Económico de América Latina, 1950.” New York, 1951.Google Scholar

CEPAL “La cooperación internacional en la política de desarrollo latinoamericana.” New York, 1954. E/CN.12/359.Google Scholar

Chilcote, Ronald Intellectuals and the Search for National Identity in Twentieth-Century Brazil. Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Collier, David, ed. The New Authoritarianism in Latin America. Princeton University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Devés, Eduardo El pensamiento latinoamericano en el siglo XX: de la CEPAL al neoliberalismo. Buenos Aires: Biblos, 2003.Google Scholar

Evans, Peter. Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State, and Local Capital in Brazil. Princeton University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Evans, Peter, Skocpol, Theda, and Rueschmeyer, Dietrich, eds. Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Fajardo, Margarita. The Latin American Development Experience: Social Sciences, Economic Policies, and the Making of a Global Order, 1944–1971. PhD Dissertation, Princeton University, 2015.Google Scholar

Fernandes, Florestan “Economia e Sociedade no Brasil: análise sociológica do subdesenvolvimento.” In: A Sociologia numa Era de Revolução Social, ed. Fernandes, Florestan. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar Editores, 1976.Google Scholar

Ferreira, Jorge João Goulart: uma biografia. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 2011.Google Scholar

Ferreira, Jorge O populismo e sua história: debate e crítica. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 2011.Google Scholar

Ferreira, Jorge and Angela de, C. Gomes. 1964: O golpe que derrubou um presidente, pôs fim ao regime democrático e instituiu a ditadura no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 2014.Google Scholar

Furtado, Celso. “Características da economia brasileira.” Revista Brasileira de Economia, 4, 1, 1950: 7–38.Google Scholar

Furtado, Celso. A Economia Brasileira: contribuição a análise do seu desenvolvimento. Rio de Janeiro: Editora A Noite, 1954.Google Scholar

Furtado, Celso. “Obstáculos políticos para el desarrollo económico.” Desarrollo Económico, 4, 16, 1965: 373–389.Google Scholar

Furtado, Celso.La Fantasía Organizada. Bogotá: Tercer Mundo Editores, 1989.Google Scholar

Garretón, Manuel Antonio, Murmis, Miguel, Sierra, Geronimo, and Trindade, Hélgio. “Social Sciences in Latin America: A Comparative Perspective –Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, and Uruguay.” Social Science Information, 557, 2005: 557–593.Google Scholar

Gilman, Claudia Entre la pluma y el fusil: Debates y dilemas del escritor revolucionario en América Latina. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI, 2003.Google Scholar

Hirschman, Albert, ed. Latin American Issues. New York: Twentieth Century Fund, 1961.Google Scholar

Hirschman, Albert, Journeys Toward Progress: Studies of Economic Policy-Making in Latin America. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund, 1963.Google Scholar

Ianni, Octavio “El Estado y el desarrollo económico del Brasil.” Desarrollo Económico, 2, 4, 1964: 551–572.Google Scholar

ILPES (Instituto Latinoamericano y del Caribe de Planificación Económica y Social). “Actas Resumidas de la Cuarta Reunión del Consejo Directivo.” Santiago January 13–14. INST/32/Rev.1, 1964.Google Scholar

Jackson, Luiz Carlos “Generaciones pioneras de las ciencias sociales en Brasil.” In Historia de los intelectuales en América Latina, ed. Altamirano, Carlos. Buenos Aires: Katz Editores, 2010.Google Scholar

Kay, Cristóbal Latin American Theories of Development and Underdevelopment. London: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar

Love, Joseph “Economic Ideas and Ideologies in Latin America since 1930.” In The Cambridge History of Latin America, ed. Bethell, Leslie. Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Medina Echavarría, José. “Sección de Sociología del Desarrollo.” Santiago: ILPES, 1963, https://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/32938 (accessed October 17, 2017).Google Scholar

Miller, Nicola In the Shadow of the State: Intellectuals and the Quest for National Identity in Twentieth-Century Spanish America. London: Verso, 1999.Google Scholar

Montecinos, Verónica Economists, Politics and the State: Chile, 1958–94. Amsterdam: CEDLA, 1998.Google Scholar

Moura, Flavio and Montero, Paula. Retrato de grupo. São Paulo: Cosac y Naify, 2009.Google Scholar

O’Donnell, Guillermo Modernization and Bureaucratic Authoritarianism: Studies in South American Politics. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California, 1973.Google Scholar

Oliveira, Lúcia Lippi de “As Ciências Sociais no Rio de Janeiro.” In História das Ciências Sociais no Brasil, ed. Sergio Miceli. São Paulo: Editora Sumaré: FABESP, 1995.Google Scholar

Ross, Dorothy and Porter, Theodore, The Cambridge History of Science, Vol. 7: The Modern Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

San Tiago Dantas, Francisco Clementino de. Plano Restituição Dívida Externa, March 25. Rio de Janeiro, Arquivo Nacional, AP. 47 No. 41: 2, 1963.Google Scholar

Skidmore, Thomas Politics in Brazil, 1930–64: An Experiment in Democracy. Oxford University Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Tavares, Maria Conceição, Melo, Hildete, and Caputo, Ana, “As origens do Banco Nacional Econômico (BNDE) 1952–1955.” Memórias do Desenvolvimento, 4, 4, 2010: 13–44.Google Scholar

Trindade, Helio, Garretón, Manuel Antonio, Murmis, Miguel, and Sierra, Gerónimo, As Ciências Socias na América Latina em Pespective Comparada, 1930–2005. Porto Alegre: Editora UFRGS, 2007.Google Scholar

Weffort, Francisco “Estado y masas en el Brasil.” Revista Latinoamericana de Sociología, 1, 1965: 53–71.Google Scholar

“1958 [alocución de año nuevo].” Speech by Alberto Lleras Camargo, December 31, 1958. In El primer gobierno del Frente Nacional, vol. I, Mayo de 1958–agosto de 1959. Bogotá: Imprenta Nacional, 1960: 224.Google Scholar

Acosta Polo, Benigno. “Bondades y fallas del plebiscito.” La República, September 29, 1962.Google Scholar

Adelman, Jeremy. Worldly Philosopher: The Odyssey of Albert O. Hirschman. Princeton University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Adelman, Jeremy. “Alianza Sí, Progreso No.” Time, March 16, 1962.Google Scholar

Allen, Robert S. “Senators Ring Alarm on Latin Plan.” Los Angeles Times, March 1, 1962.Google Scholar

Andrade Melgarejo, Diana. “‘We Left Legality to Enter the Rule of Law:’ The Constitutional Struggle for Congress in Colombia, 1945–1962,” PhD dissertation, Princeton University, 2018.Google Scholar

Andrade Melgarejo, Diana. “Año del ejecutivo.” Semana, January 14, 1960.Google Scholar

Arocha, Jaime. “Antropología en Colombia: Una visión.” InUn siglo de investigación social: Antropologia en Colombia, eds. Arocha, Jaime and de Friedemann, Nina S. Bogotá: Etno, 1984.Google Scholar

Arocha, Jaime, and de Friedemann, Nina S.. “Prólogo.” In Un siglo de investigación social: Antropología en Colombia, eds. Arocha, Jaime and de Friedemann, Nina S. Bogotá: Etno, 1984.Google Scholar

Bejarano, Ana María, and Leongómez, Eduardo Pizarro. “From ‘Restricted’ to ‘Besieged:’ The Changing Nature of the Limits to Democracy in Colombia.” In The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America: Advances and Setbacks, eds. Hagopian, Frances and Mainwaring, Scott P. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Carpenter, Daniel P. The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Cataño, Gonzalo. La sociología en Colombia: Balance crítico. Bogotá: Plaza & Janés, 1986.Google Scholar

Centeno, Miguel A. and Agustin E. Ferraro. “With the Best of Intentions. Types of Developmental Failure in Latin America.” In Why Latin American Nations Fail. Development Strategies in the Twenty-First Century, eds. Caldentey, Esteban and Vernengo, Matías, Oakland: University of California Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Centeno, Miguel A.Cincuenta años: Departamento Nacional de Planeación. Bogotá: Departamento Nacional de Planeación, 2009.Google Scholar

Collier, David, ed. The New Authoritarianism in Latin America. Princeton University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Collier, David“Colombia Credit Restored.” Washington Star, December 3, 1966.Google Scholar

Cubides, Fernando. Camilo Torres: Testimonios sobre su figura y su época. Medellín: La Carreta Editores and Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 2010.Google Scholar

Dargent, Eduardo. Technocracy and Democracy in Latin America: The Experts Running Government. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística. Anuario general de estadística. Colombia – 1962. Bogotá: Imprenta Nacional, 1964.Google Scholar

Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística Estadística fiscal, administrativa y financiera. 1963–1964–1965. Bogotá: Imprenta Nacional, 1969.Google Scholar

Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística Estadística fiscal, administrativa y financiera, 1966–1967. Bogotá: Talleres del Departamento Nacional de Estadística, n.d.Google Scholar

Díaz-Alejandro, Carlos F. Colombia. Vol. 9: Foreign Trade Regimes and Economic Development. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1976.Google Scholar

“De una década a otra.” El Tiempo, January 2, 1960. https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=_QodAAAAIBAJ&sjid=K34EAAAAIBAJ&pg=2926,20812&hl=en.Google Scholar

“Discurso de posesión.” Speech by Lleras Camargo, August 7, 1958, in El primer gobierno del Frente Nacional, vol. I, Mayo de 1958–agosto de 1959, Bogotá: Imprenta Nacional, 1960: I,61.Google Scholar

Eder, Richard. “2 Factors Peril Aid to Colombia.” New York Times, November 11, 1962.Google Scholar

Eder, Richard “Bogota Prepares for Aid Program.” New York Times, December 29, 1963a.Google Scholar

Eder, Richard “Colombia Lagging on Economic Plan.” New York Times, October 3, 1963b.Google Scholar

Eder, Richard “Colombia Works for Land Reform.” New York Times, April 8, 1963c.Google Scholar

Eder, Richard “Colombia’s Dangerous Doldrums.” The Reporter, October 7, 1965.Google Scholar

Eder, Richard “Economic Dilemma in Colombia.” New York Times, March 28, 1963d.Google Scholar

Eder, Richard “El embajador en Washington.” El Tiempo, May 17, 1963, http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=2RwhAAAAIBAJ&sjid=yWMEAAAAIBAJ&pg=7098%2C2559472.Google Scholar

Emiliani Román, Raimundo. El fracaso ruinoso de la reforma agraria. Bogotá: Editorial Revista Colombiana, 1971.Google Scholar

Emiliani Román, Raimundo“Enorme incremento de los cultivos de palma africana.” El Tiempo, March 20, 1965: 24, https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=MnQcAAAAIBAJ&sjid=wWMEAAAAIBAJ&pg=7290%2C3232988.Google Scholar

Evans, Peter. “The State as Problem and Solution: Predation, Embedded Autonomy, and Structural Change.” In The Politics of Economic Adjustment: International Constraints, Distributive Conflicts, and the State, eds. Haggard, Stephan and Kaufman, Robert R. Princeton University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Fajardo, Margarita. “The Latin American Experience with Development: Social Sciences, Economic Policies, and the Making of a Global Order, 1944–1971.” PhD diss., Princeton University, 2015.Google Scholar

Fals Borda, Orlando. La transformación de la América Latina y sus implicaciones sociales y económicas. Monografías sociológicas, no. 10. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Sociología, 1961.Google Scholar

Valderrama, Gómez, Pedro. Memoria del Ministro de Gobierno al Congreso de 1966. Bogotá: Imprenta Nacional, 1966.Google Scholar

Gonzalez, Heliodoro. “The Failure of the Alliance for Progress in Colombia.” Inter-American Economic Affairs 23, no.1, Summer 1969: 87–96.Google Scholar

Guillén Martínez, Fernando. “Notas sobre la vida social en Colombia.” El Tiempo, June 4, 1961, sec. Lecturas Dominicales.Google Scholar

Guillén Martínez, Fernando Raíz y futuro de la revolución. Bogotá: Ediciones Tercer Mundo, 1963.Google Scholar

Gutiérrez Quintero, Armando. “La violencia.” El Cronista, January 3, 1964.Google Scholar

Gutiérrez Sanín, Francisco. ¿Lo que el viento se llevó? Los partidos políticos y la democracia en Colombia, 1958–2002. Bogotá: Grupo Editorial Norma, 2007.Google Scholar

Gutiérrez Sanín, Francisco El orangutan con sacoleva: Cien años de democracia y represión en Colombia (1910–2010). Bogotá: IEPRI, 2014.Google Scholar

Hartlyn, Jonathan. “Military Governments and the Transition to Civilian Rule: The Colombian Experience of 1957–1958.” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 26, 2, May 1984: 245–281.Google Scholar

Hirschman, Albert O. Journeys Toward Progress: Studies of Economic Policy-Making in Latin America. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, 1965.Google Scholar

Hirschman, Albert O. Development Projects Observed. Washington: Brookings Institution, 1967.Google Scholar

Hirschman, Albert O.The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism Before Its Triumph. Princeton University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Hirschman, Albert O.“Informe al Congreso.” Speech by Alberto Lleras Camargo, July 20, 1959, in El primer gobierno: del Frente Nacional, vol. II, Agosto de 1959–julio de 1960, Bogotá: Imprenta Nacional, 1960: I, 500.Google Scholar

“Instalación del Congreso.” Speech by Alberto Lleras Camargo, July 20, 1960, in El primer gobierno del Frente Nacional, vol. II, Agosto de 1959–julio de 1960, Bogotá: Imprenta Nacional, 1960: 473–474.Google Scholar

Instituto Colombiano de la Reforma Agraria. Informe de actividades, 1964: Tercer año de reforma agraria. Bogotá: Imprenta Nacional, 1965.Google Scholar

Ioris, Rafael Rossotto. Transforming Brazil: A History of National Development in the Postwar Era. New York and London: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar

Janvry, Alain de. The Agrarian Question and Reformism in Latin America. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Karl, Robert A. “State Formation, Violence, and Cold War in Colombia, 1957–1966.” Unpublished PhD thesis, Harvard University, 2009.Google Scholar

Karl, Robert A. Forgotten Peace: Reform, Violence, and the Making of Contemporary Colombia. Oakland: University of California Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Lilienthal, David E. TVA: Democracy on the March. New York and London: Harper & Brothers, 1944.Google Scholar

Lleras Camargo, Alberto. Nuestra revolución industrial. Bogotá: Aedita Editores, 1957.Google Scholar

“Lleras critica a grupos de presión.” El Tiempo, August 3, 1965: 12, https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=u30cAAAAIBAJ&sjid=3WMEAAAAIBAJ&pg=820%2C416024.Google Scholar

Mares, David R. “State Leadership in Economic Policy: A Collective Action Framework with a Colombian Case.” Comparative Politics 25, no.4, July 1993: 455–473.Google Scholar

“Mater et Magistra.” Encyclical letter of Pope John XXIII, May 15, 1961.Google Scholar

Molina, Adriana. “El servicio civil en Colombia.” In Hacia el rediseño del Estado: Análisis institucional, reformas y resultados económicos, eds. Gandour, Miguel Pordominsky, Luis Bernardo Mejía Guinand, . Bogotá: TM Editores & Departamento Nacional de Planeación, 1999.Google Scholar

Molina Ossa, Camilo. La reforma agraria colombiana. Cali: Imprenta Departmental, 1970.Google Scholar

Benítez, Morales, Otto. Memoria del Ministro de Agricultura al Congreso de 1961, Parte General. Bogotá:Imprenta Nacional, 1962.Google Scholar

Onis, Juan de. “Opiniones divididas sobre el voto el domingo pasado.” El Cronista, March 19, 1964.Google Scholar

Onis, Juan de “Bogota Development Plan Awaits I.M.F. Decision.” New York Times, February 5, 1967.Google Scholar

Onis, Juan de “Problems Mount in Colombia, a Model of Latin Reform.” New York Times, June 16, 1969.Google Scholar

Palacios, Marco. Between Legitimacy and Violence: A History of Colombia, 1875–2002. Translated by Richard Stoller. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Parra Sandoval, Rodrigo, ed. Dependencia externa y desarrollo político en Colombia. Bogotá: Imprenta Nacional, 1970.Google Scholar

Posada, Antonio J., and Posada, Jeanne Anderson. The CVC: Challenge to Underdevelopment and Traditionalism. Colección Aventura Del Desarrollo 9. Bogotá: Ediciones Tercer Mundo, 1966.Google Scholar

Puel, Hugues. “Catholicism and Politics in France in the 20th Century.” Oikonomia: Rivista Di Etica e Scienze Sociali, February 2001.Google Scholar

República de Colombia. Memoria del Ministerio de Agricultura al Congreso Nacional – 1959. Bogotá: Imprenta Nacional, 1959.Google Scholar

República de Colombia Memoria del Ministerio de Agricultura al Congreso Nacional – 1960. Bogotá: Imprenta Nacional, 1960.Google Scholar

Restrepo, Gabriel. “El Departamento de Sociologia de la Universidad Nacional y la tradicion sociologica colombiana.” In La sociología en Colombia: Balance y perspectivas. Memoria del III Congreso Nacional de Sociología, Bogotá, agosto 20–22 de 1980. Bogotá: Asociación Colombiana de Sociología, 1981.Google Scholar

Restrepo Piedrahita, Carlos. “El moderno Leviatán: La ciencia y la política.” El Tiempo, November 2. 1963, https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=YdkbAAAAIBAJ&sjid=7mMEAAAAIBAJ&pg=5714%2C172620.Google Scholar

Ruiz, Rojas, Humberto. “El Frente Nacional: ¿Solución política a un problema de desarrollo?” In Dependencia externa y desarrollo político en Colombia, ed. Parra Sandoval, Rodrigo. Bogotá: Imprenta Nacional, 1970.Google Scholar

Roldán, Mary. Blood and Fire: La Violencia in Antioquia, Colombia, 1946–1953. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Sáenz Rovner, Eduardo. “La Misión del Banco Mundial en Colombia, el Gobierno de Laureano Gómez (1950–1951) y la Asociación Nacional de Industriales (ANDI).” Cuadernos de Economía 20, 35, December 2001: 245–265.Google Scholar

Sáenz Rovner, Eduardo Colombia años 50: Industriales, política y diplomacia. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Bogotá, 2002.Google Scholar

Sandilands, Roger J. The Life and Political Economy of Lauchlin Currie: New Dealer, Presidential Adviser, and Development Economist. Durham: Duke University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Schmidt, Steffen W. “The Alliance’s Anniversary.” New York Times, March 13, 1962.Google Scholar

Schmidt, Steffen W. “Bureaucrats as Modernizing Brokers? Clientelism in Colombia.” Comparative Politics 6, 3, April 1974: 425–450.Google Scholar

Schmidt, Steffen W. “La Violencia Revisited: The Clientelist Bases of Political Violence in Colombia.” Journal of Latin American Studies 6, 1, May 1974: 97–111.Google Scholar

“The Mess in Bogota.” Time, October 22, 1956.Google Scholar

Thorp, Rosemary. Economic Management and Economic Development in Peru and Colombia. University of Pittsburgh Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Thorp, Rosemary Progress, Poverty and Exclusion: An Economic History of Latin America in the 20th Century. Washington, D.C.: Inter-American Development Bank, 1998.Google Scholar

“Trascendentales tesis políticas de Lleras.” El Tiempo, August 6, 1965: 20, https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=vn0cAAAAIBAJ&sjid=3WMEAAAAIBAJ&pg=672%2C853160.Google Scholar

UNICEF, “The 1960s: Decade of Development.” N.d., www.unicef.org/sowc96/1960s.htm.Google Scholar

Vargas, Uribe, Diego. Evolución política y constitucional de Colombia. Madrid: Instituto de Derecho Comparado, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 1996.Google Scholar

Urrutia, Miguel. “On the Absence of Economic Populism in Colombia.” InThe Macroeconomics of Populism in Latin America, eds. Dornbusch, Rudiger and Edwards, Sebastian. University of Chicago Press, 1991.Google Scholar

US Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, and Comptroller General. “Survey of the Alliance for Progress: Colombia – A Case Study of U.S. Aid,” February 1, 1969.Google Scholar

Álvarez, Vélez, Guillermo, Luis. “Lauchlin Currie: El maestro de los economistas colombianos.” Lecturas de Economía, 79, December 2013: 233–239.Google Scholar

Vidal Perdomo, Jaime. La reforma constitucional de 1968 y sus alcances jurídicos. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia, 1970.Google Scholar

Vieira, Gilberto. “Los diez años de ‘Documentos Políticos’ y sus nuevas tareas teórico-políticas.” Documentos Políticos, December 1966.Google Scholar

“Youth Points Way for Colombia to Return to a Stable Economy.” New York Times, January 13, 1960.Google Scholar

Zamosc, León. The Agrarian Question and the Peasant Movement in Colombia: Struggles of the National Peasant Association, 1967–1981. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Zuluaga Gil, Ricardo. “Reforma constitucional de 1968. La última gran reforma.” Crónica Constitucional (blog), April 29, 2016. http://ricardozuluagagil.blogspot.com/2016/04/reforma-constitucional-de-1968-la-ultima.html?q=colombia+1968.Google Scholar