Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T16:13:01.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Three - The Global Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2021

Diana Panke
Affiliation:
Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany
Sören Stapel
Affiliation:
Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany
Anna Starkmann
Affiliation:
Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany
Get access

Summary

Comparative regionalism has illustrated that there are ROs in all parts of the globe (Börzel and Risse, 2016a; Söderbaum, 2016b). While there are detailed case studies on some of these organizations, as of yet, a comprehensive analysis of all ROs over a large period of time is lacking.

In order to detect global trajectories of RO development, this chapter sheds light on all 76 ROs at once in focusing on both dimensions that constitute the RO typology: policy scope and size (see Chapter 2). It describes RO creation and membership dynamics as well as the development of RO policy competencies over time (1945– 2015). This reveals first that the number of ROs has steadily increased over time. While there were only two ROs in 1945, states maintain 71 such organizations in 2015, while five ROs were dissolved. Second, regional cooperation takes place in all parts of the globe. There are 23 ROs in Africa, 18 in the Americas, 19 in Asia, and 16 in Europe (see Table A1 in the Appendix). Third, the average size of ROs has risen over time. Fourth, a broadening of RO policy competencies can be witnessed, which is important since such competencies provide the legal ground on which ROs can act on a daily basis. While, for instance, the average RO covered 14.8 specific policy competencies in 1950, this number slowly increased until the end of the Cold War (28.9) and then skyrocketed afterwards (78 in 2010). In short, the proliferation of newly created ROs and their policy competencies took place in two waves of regionalism, one in the aftermath of WWII and one after the end of the Cold War.

The creation and dissolution of Ros

Regional cooperation began in the early 20th century, when the oldest still existing organization, SACU, was created in 1910 by the predecessors of today's Botswana, the Kingdom of Eswatini, Lesotho, Namibia and South Africa (Panke and Stapel, 2018a). It remained the only RO until the AL was founded in 1945, according to the ROCO dataset. In this decade, four additional ROs came into being, thereby starting the first but rather weak wave of regional cooperation. As the dotted line in Figure 3.1 illustrates, the first wave of regional cooperation in which an incremental increase in the cumulative number of ROs can be observed ended with the end of the Cold War in 1990/91.

Type
Chapter
Information
Comparing Regional Organizations
Global Dynamics and Regional Particularities
, pp. 29 - 44
Publisher: Bristol University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • The Global Perspective
  • Diana Panke, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany, Sören Stapel, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany, Anna Starkmann, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany
  • Book: Comparing Regional Organizations
  • Online publication: 12 March 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.46692/9781529209488.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • The Global Perspective
  • Diana Panke, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany, Sören Stapel, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany, Anna Starkmann, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany
  • Book: Comparing Regional Organizations
  • Online publication: 12 March 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.46692/9781529209488.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • The Global Perspective
  • Diana Panke, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany, Sören Stapel, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany, Anna Starkmann, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany
  • Book: Comparing Regional Organizations
  • Online publication: 12 March 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.46692/9781529209488.004
Available formats
×