Summary
Abstract
The imagery of films both reflected and spurred radical shifts in women's lives throughout the 20th century. The history of film, and of responses to film, provides evidence of social attitudes and prejudices—those in Hollywood but also regional biases, pertaining to race as well as to gender. Those who were socially denigrated, such as prostitutes, were often treated with a degree of respect in screen narratives. The traditional genres had depended on closure; film, especially post–World War II, featured women and children with complexly difficult lives often lacking neat resolutions. Resnais, Bergman, and Antonioni each focused on women with humdrum rather than heroic lives, and made them the linchpin for studies of the psychological pressures of the modern world.
Keywords: Camille, detective stories, Giulietta Masina, Mae West, Scandinavian feminism, screwball
You’re a good man, sister.
One of the tasks of the 20th century, retrospectively understood, was the recasting of norms for female lives. One of the chief tasks of aesthetics since Romanticism has been defining new attitudes toward sexual themes in the arts. Cinema played an important role in both processes, alternately reflecting expectations and instigating modification. The changes, like the cultural tectonic shifts of the Renaissance, were apparent even to thoseclosest to it. As a character in Josephine Tey's 1948 novel opines, ‘since entertainment came into the country with the cinema, God bless it, an end has been put to witch-hunting’. ‘Women were never seen until films arrived’, Ernst Betts asserted categorically.
Many of the elements of Romanticism carried over into the world of cinema: the swooning female and the swashbuckling hero were both stamped in our collective consciousness in significant part by Romantic artists, renouncers of the allegorical substructure of fiction by which all love was potentially of the divine, which in turn had seemed to guarantee that emotion might be reconciled with reason, or at least with faith. The art of Romanticism instead celebrated emotions for their own sake, and although previous art had been by no means utterly chaste, this shift much enlarged the scope not only for lascivious imagery but for frank celebrations of carnality.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Moving Pictures and Renaissance Art History , pp. 409 - 478Publisher: Amsterdam University PressPrint publication year: 2021