Around the middle of the tenth century, Flodoard of Rheims (894–966) wrote a history of his see, the Historia Remensis. In it, we find an interesting attribution of the De XII abusiuis saeculi. This work was, so notes Flodoard, written by Archbishop Hincmar of Rheims (845–882) ‘[…] for the instruction of the king, in which he gathers together the opinions of the Fathers and the constitutions of preceding kings and reminds Charles of the promise he had made before his coronation to the princes and bishops’. Flodoard's attribution of DDAS was likely indebted to his reading of a letter of 859 in which Hincmar extensively used the treatise, written to give advice to King Charles the Bald. Yet in his letter, Hincmar had explicitly attributed his excerpts from DDAS to Cyprian.

While one can interpret this as a simple misreading on the part of Flodoard, it also tells us something about how differently DDAS could be used and contextualized by different Frankish authors at different times. To Hincmar, the treatise was the work of St Cyprian, associated ‘with the tremendous authority of pristine Christianity’, and held up as an example for kings. To Flodoard, on the other hand, it was the work of Hincmar, and associated not with a pristine patristic past, but with the eminently political Carolingian ‘golden age’ of his Church. To him, it exemplified the duty of the bishops of Rheims to admonish their kings and defend their Church on the stage of regnal politics.