Adams, J. N. (1982) The Latin Sexual Vocabulary. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Ahl, F. M. (1984) “The art of safe criticism in Greece and Rome,” AJPh 105: 174–208.Google Scholar

Ahl, F. M. (1986) “Statius' Thebaid: a reconsideration,” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.32. 5: 2803–912.Google Scholar

Allen, G. (2000) Intertextuality. London.Google Scholar

Anderson, W. S. (1997) Ovid's Metamorphoses: Books 1–5. Norman, OK.Google Scholar

Aricò, G. (1960) “Sul mito di Lino e Corebo in Stazio, Tebaide 1.557–668,” Rivista di filologiae e di istruzione classica 88: 277–85.Google Scholar

Aricò, G. (1961) “Stazio e L'Ipsipile euripidea: note sull'imitazione staziana,” Dioniso 35. 3–4: 56–67, reprinted in Aricò (1972): 85–98.Google Scholar

Aricò, G. (1972) Ricerche staziane. Palermo.Google Scholar

Aricò, G. (1991) “La vicenda di Lemno in Stazio e Valerio Flacco,” in Ratis Omnia Vincet: Untersuchungen zu den Argonautica des Valerius Flaccus, eds. Matthias, K. and Tschiedel, H. J.. Heldesheim: 197–210.Google Scholar

Austin, R. G. (ed.) (1964) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Secundus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bal, M. (1997) Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative, 2nd edn. Toronto.Google Scholar

Bannon, C. J. (1997) The Brothers of Romulus: Fraternal Pietas in Roman Law, Literature, and Society. Princeton.

Barchiesi, A. (1984) La traccia del modello: effetti omerici nella narrazione virgiliana. Pisa.Google Scholar

Barton, C. A. (1993) The Sorrows of the Ancient Romans. Princeton.Google Scholar

Bartsch, S. (1994) Actors in the Audience: Theatricality and Doublespeak from Nero to Hadrian. Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beacham, R. C. (1999) Spectacle Entertainments of Early Imperial Rome. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar

Beard, M., North, J., and Price, S. (1998) Religions of Rome, vol. 1: A History. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bernstein, N. W. (2003) “Ancestors, status, and self-presentation in Statius' Thebaid,” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 133: 353–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernstein, N. W. (2004) “Auferte oculos: modes of spectatorship in Statius, Thebaid 11,” Phoenix 58: 62–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berres, T. (1992) Vergil und die Helenaszene mit einem Exkurs zu den Halbversen. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Billerbeck, M. (1986) “Stoizismus in der römischen Epik der neronischer und flavischer Zeit,” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.36.5: 3116–51.Google Scholar

Bömer, F. (ed.) (1976) P. Ovidius Naso. Metamorphosen. Buch IV–V. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Bond, G. W. (ed.) (1963) Hypsipyle. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bramble, J. (1982) “Lucan,” in The Cambridge History of Classical Literature II: Latin Literature, eds. Kenney, E. J. and Clausen, W. V.. Cambridge: 533–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braund, S. M. (1996) “Ending epic: Statius, Theseus and a merciful release,” PCPhS 42: 1–23.Google Scholar

Braund, S. M. and Gilbert, G. (2003) “An ABC of epic ira: anger, beasts, and cannibalism,” in Ancient Anger: Perspectives from Homer to Galen (YClS vol. XXⅫ), eds. Braund, S. M. and Most, G.. Cambridge: 250–85.Google Scholar

Brooks, P. (1984) Reading for the Plot. New York.Google Scholar

Brown, J. (1994) “Into the woods: narrative studies in the Thebaid of Statius with special reference to books IV–VI,” diss., Cambridge.Google Scholar

Burgess, J. F. (1971–2) “Pietas in Virgil and Statius,” Proceedings of the Virgil Society 11: 48–61.Google Scholar

Burgess, J. F. (1972) “Statius' altar of Mercy,” Classical Quarterly 22: 339–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, H. E. (1909) Post-Augustan Poetry from Seneca to Juvenal. Oxford.Google Scholar

Cairns, F. (1989) Virgil's Augustan Epic. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carrara, P. (1986) “Stazio e i primordia di Tebe: poetica e polemica nel prologo della Tebaide,” Prometheus 12: 146–58.Google Scholar

Carroll, N. (1990) The Philosophy of Horror. London.Google Scholar

Caviglia, F. (ed.) (1973) La Tebaide: Libro I. Rome.Google Scholar

Clausen, W. (1987) Virgil's Aeneid and the Tradition of Hellenistic Poetry. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Coleman, K. M. (1986) “The emperor Domitian and literature,” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.32. 5: 3087–115.Google Scholar

Coleman, K. M. (1990) “Fatal charades: Roman executions staged as mythological enactments,” Journal of Roman Studies 80: 44–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1986) The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets, tr. C. Segal. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Criado, C. (2000) La teología de la Tebaida Estaciana: el anti-virgilianismo de un clasicista. Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Davies, M. (1989) The Epic Cycle. Bristol.Google Scholar

Delarue, F. (2000) Stace, poète, épique: originalité et cohérence. Louvain and Paris.Google Scholar

Dewar, M. (ed.) (1991) Statius: Thebaid IX. Oxford.Google Scholar

Dietrich, J. (1999) “Thebaid's feminine ending,” Ramus 28: 40–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dihle, A. (1994) Greek and Roman Literature of the Roman Empire: From Augustus to Justinian, tr. M. Malzahn. London and New York.Google Scholar

Dodds, E. R. (ed.) (1960) Euripides: Bacchae. Oxford.Google Scholar

Dominik, W. J. (1990) “Monarchal power and imperial politics in Statius' Thebaid,” in The Imperial Muse: Ramus Essays on Roman Literature of the Empire, II: Flavian Epicist to Claudian, ed. A. J. Boyle. Bendigo: 74–97.Google Scholar

Dominik, W. J. (1994a) The Mythic Voice of Statius: Power and Politics in the Thebaid. Leiden.Google Scholar

Dominik, W. J. (1994b) Speech and Rhetoric in Statius' Thebaid. Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Dominik, W. J. (1997) “Ratio et dei: psychology and the supernatural in the Lemnian episode,” in Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History VIII (Collection Latomus 239), ed. Brussels, C. Deroux.: 29–50.Google Scholar

Dominik, W. J. (2003) “Following in whose footsteps?: the epilogue to Statius' Thebaid,” in Literature, Art, History: Studies on Classical Antiquity and Tradition in Honour of W. J. Henderson, eds. Basson, A. F. and Dominik, W. J.. New York: 91–109.Google Scholar

Douglas, M. (1966) Purity and Danger. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edmunds, L. (2001) Intertextuality and the Reading of Roman Poetry. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Edwards, M. W. (1991) The Iliad: A Commentary, vol. V: Books 17–20. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Egan, R. B. (1996) “A reading of the Helen–Venus episode in Aeneid 2,” Echos du monde classique 40, n.s. 15: 379–95.Google Scholar

Erler, M. (1992) “Der Zorn des Helden, Philodems ‘De Ira’ and Vergil's Konzept des Zorns in der ‘Aeneis,’” Grazer Beiträge: Zeitschrift für die klassische Altertumswissenschaft 18: 103–26.Google Scholar

Ernout, A. (1959) Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine: histoire des mots. Paris.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (1983), “Nihil iam iura naturae valent: incest and fratricide in Seneca's Phoenissae,” in Seneca Tragicus: Ramus Essays on Senecan Drama, ed. Boyle, A. J.. Berwick and Victoria, Australia: 61–76.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (1995) “The ambiguity of Virtus in Lucan's Civil War and Statius' Thebaid,” Arachnion3: http://www.cisi.unito.it/arachne/num3/fantham.html.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (1997) “‘Envy and fear the begetter of hate’: Statius' Thebaid and the genesis of hatred,” in The Passions in Roman Thought and Literature, eds. Braund, S. M. and Gill, C.. Cambridge: 185–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fantham, E. (2003) “The angry poet and the angry gods: problems of theodicy in Lucan's epic of defeat,” in Ancient Anger: Perspectives from Homer to Galen (YClS vol. XXⅫ), eds. Braund, S. M. and Most, G.. Cambridge: 229–49.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (1991) Vergil's Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic: The Art of Allusion in Literary History. Oxford.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. (1984) “The reconciliations of Juno,” Classical Quarterly n.s. 34: 179–94, reprinted in Oxford Readings in Vergil's Aeneid, ed. Harrison, S. J. (1990). Oxford: 339–62.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. (1986) “History and revelation in Vergil's underworld,” PCPhS 32: 1–24.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. (1991) The Gods in Epic: Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition. Oxford.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. (1999) “Epic violence, epic order: killings, catalogues, and the role of the reader in Aeneid 10,” in Reading Vergil's Aeneid: An Interpretive Guide, ed. Perkell, C.. Norman, OK: 178–94.Google Scholar

Feldherr, A. (1998) Spectacle and Society in Livy's History. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Fernandelli, M. (2000) “Statius' Thebaid 4.165–72 and Euripides' Phoenissae 1113–18,” Symbolae Osloenses 75: 89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fish, J. (2004) “Anger, Philodemus' good king, and the Helen episode of Aeneid 2.567–589: a new proof of authenticity from Herculaneum,” in Vergil, Philodemus, and the Augustans, eds. Armstrong, D., Fish, J., Johnston, P. A., and Skinner, M.. Austin, TX: 111–38.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. (1990) “Deviant focalisation in Virgil's Aeneid,” PCPhS 36: 42–63.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. (1997a) “On the shoulders of giants: intertextuality and Classical studies,” Materiali e discussioni per l'analisi dei testi classici 39: 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fowler, D. (1997b) “Epicurean anger,” in The Passions in Roman Thought and Literature, eds. Braund, S. M. and Gill, C.. Cambridge: 16–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fowler, D. (2001) “Introduction,” in Texts, Ideas, and the Classics: Scholarship, Theory, and Classical Literature, ed. Harrison, S. J.. Oxford: 65–9.Google Scholar

Franchet, d'Espèrey S. (1977) “Variations épiques sur un thème animalier,” Revue des études latines 55: 157–72.Google Scholar

Franchet, d'Espèrey S. (1986) “Vespasien, Titus et la litérature,” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.32. 5: 3048–86.Google Scholar

Franchet, d'Espèrey S. (1999) Conflit, violence et non-violence dans la Thébaïde de Stace. Paris.Google Scholar

Franchet, d'Espèrey S. (2001) “La causalité dans le chant 1 de la Thébaïde de Stace: où commence la Thébaïde?,” Revue des études latines 79: 188–200.Google Scholar

Frank, M. (ed.) (1995) Seneca's Phoenissae: Introduction and Commentary. Leiden.Google Scholar

Freeland, C. (2000) The Naked and the Undead: Evil and the Appeal of Horror. Boulder, CO.Google Scholar

Frings, I. (1991) Gespräch und Handlung in der Thebais des Statius. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Frings, I. (1996) “Hypsipyle und Aeneas: zur Vergilimitation in Thebais V,” in Epicedion: hommage à P. Papinius Statius (96–1996), eds. Delarue, F., Georgacopoulou, S., Laurens, P., and Taisne, A.-M.. Poitiers: 145–60.Google Scholar

Gale, M. (2000) Virgil on the Nature of Things: The Georgics, Lucretius and the Didactic Tradition. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galinsky, K. (1966) “The Hercules-Cacus episode in Aeneid VIII,” AJPh 87: 18–51.Google Scholar

Galinsky, K. (1988) “The anger of Aeneas,” AJPh 109: 321–48.Google Scholar

Galinsky, K. (1994) “How to be philosophical about the end of the Aeneid,” Illinois Classical Studies 19: 191–201.Google Scholar

Galinsky, K. (1996) Augustan Culture. Princeton.Google Scholar

Gantz, T. (1993) Early Greek Myth: A Guide to Literary and Artistic Sources. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Garrod, H. W. (ed.) (1906) P. Papini Stati: Thebais et Achilleis. Oxford.Google Scholar

Georgacopoulou, S. (1996a) “Jeu d'ironie tragique et jeu de voix à la fin du livre 2 de la Thébaïde de Stace,” Echos du monde classique 40, n.s. 15: 275–81.Google Scholar

Georgacopoulou, S. (1996b) “Ranger/déranger: catalogues et listes de personages dans la Thébaïde,” in Epicedion: hommage à P. Papinius Statius (96–1996), eds. Delarue, F., Georgacopoulou, S., Laurens, P., and Taisne, A.-M.. Poitiers: 83–129.Google Scholar

Georgacopoulou, S. (1998) “Les Erinyes et le narrateur épique ou la métamorphose impossible (Stace Theb. 11.576–579),” Phoenix 52: 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gill, C. (1997) “Passion as madness in Roman poetry,” in The Passions in Roman Thought and Literature, eds. Braund, S. M. and Gill, C.. Cambridge: 213–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gill, C. (2003) “Reactive and objective attitudes: anger in Virgil's Aeneid and Hellenistic philosophy,” in Ancient Anger: Perspectives from Homer to Galen (YClS vol. XXⅫ), eds. Braund, S. M. and Most, G.. Cambridge: 208–28.Google Scholar

Glare, P. G. W. (ed.) (1962–82) Oxford Latin Dictionary. Oxford.

Goold, G. P. (1970) “Servius and the Helen episode,” HSCPh 74: 101–68, reprinted in Oxford Readings in Vergil's Aeneid, ed. Harrison, S. J. (1990). Oxford: 60–126.Google Scholar

Gossage, A. J. (1969) “Virgil and the Flavian epic,” in Virgil, ed. Dudley, D. R.. London: 67–93.Google Scholar

Gransden, K. W. (ed.) (1976) Virgil: Aeneid Book VIII. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gransden, K. W. (1984) Virgil's Iliad: An Essay on Epic Narrative. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. (2000) “The Flavians,” in The Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 11: The High Empire, AD 70–192, eds. Bowman, A., Garnsey, P., and Rathbone, D.. Cambridge: 1–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffin, M. (2003) “Clementia after Caesar: from politics to philosophy,” in Caesar against Liberty?: Perspectives on his Autocracy. Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar vol. Ⅺ, eds. Cairns, F. and Fantham, R. E.. Cambridge: 157–82.Google Scholar

Gruzelier, C. (1994) “The influence of Virgil's Dido on Statius' portrayal of Hypsipyle,” Prudentia 26. 1: 153–65.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1986) Virgil's Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1990a) “Flavian epicists on Virgil's epic technique,” in The Imperial Muse: Ramus Essays on Roman Literature of the Empire, II: Flavian Epicist to Claudian, ed. Boyle, A. J.. Bendigo: 3–20.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1990b) “Ovid's Theban history: the first ‘Anti-Aeneid’?,” Classical Quarterly n.s. 40: 224–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1993) The Epic Successors of Virgil: A Study in the Dynamics of a Tradition. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R.(ed.) (1994) Virgil: Aeneid Book IX. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1997) “Closure in Latin epic,” in Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature, eds. Roberts, D. H., Dunn, F. M., and Fowler, D.. Princeton: 139–62.Google Scholar

Hardie, W. R. (1916) “Virgil, Statius and Dante,” Journal of Roman Studies 6: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, S. J. (ed.) (1991) Vergil: Aeneid 10. Oxford.Google Scholar

Harrison, S. J. (1998) “The sword-belt of Pallas: moral symbolism and political ideology (Aen. 10.495–505),” in Vergil's Aeneid: Augustan Epic and Political Context, ed. Stahl, H.-P.. London: 223–42.Google Scholar

Heinrich, A. (1999) “Longa retro series: sacrifice and repetition in Statius' Menoeceus episode,” Arethusa 32. 2: 165–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heinze, R. (1993) Virgil's Epic Technique, tr. H. Harvey, D. Harvey, and F. Robertson. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Heller, T. (1987) The Delights of Terror: An Aesthetics of the Tale of Terror. Champaign, IL.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (1988) “Lucan/the word at war,” in The Imperial Muse: Ramus Essays on Roman Literature of the Empire, vol. I: To Juvenal through Ovid, ed. Boyle, A. J.. Victoria, Australia: 122–64.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (1991) “Statius' Thebaid/form premade,” PCPhS 37: 30–80.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (1993) “Form remade/Statius' Thebaid,” in Roman Epic, ed. Boyle, A. J.. London and New York: 162–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henderson, J. (1994) “To recognise Bosnia/Statius, Thebaid 11.407–8,” Liverpool Classical Monthly 19. 2: 25–7.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (1998) Fighting for Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hershkowitz, D. (1995) “Patterns of madness in Statius' Thebaid,” Journal of Roman Studies 85: 52–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hershkowitz, D. (1997) “‘Parce metu, Cytherea’: ‘failed’ intertext repetition in Statius' Thebaid, or, don't stop me if you've heard this one before,” Materiali e discussioni per l'analisi dei testi classici 39: 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hershkowitz, D. (1998a) The Madness of Epic: Reading Insanity from Homer to Statius. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hershkowitz, D. (1998b) Valerius Flaccus' Argonautica. Oxford.Google Scholar

Heuvel, H. (ed.) (1932) Papinii Statii Thebaidos Liber Primus. Zutphen.Google Scholar

Hill, D. E. (1990) “Statius' Thebaid: a glimmer of light in a sea of darkness,” in The Imperial Muse: Ramus Essays on Roman Literature of the Empire, II: Flavian Epicist to Claudian, ed. A. J. Boyle. Bendigo: 98–118.Google Scholar

Hill, D. E.(ed.) (1996a) P. Papini Stati Thebaidos Libri Ⅻ, 2nd edn. Leiden.Google Scholar

Hill, D. E. (1996b) “Thebaid I revisited,” in Epicedion: hommage à P. Papinius Statius (96–1996), eds. Delarue, F., Georgacopoulou, S., Laurens, P., and Taisne, A.-M.. Poitiers: 35–54.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. (1998) Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, M. (1999) Statius, Thebais 12,312–463: Einleitung, Übersetzung, Kommentar. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Hopkins, K. (1983) Death and Renewal: Sociological Studies in Roman History, vol. II. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horsfall, N. (ed.) (2000) Virgil, Aeneid 7: A Commentary. Leiden.Google Scholar

Hübner, W. (1970) Dirae in römischen Epos. Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. (1993) The Argonautica of Apollonius: Literary Studies. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutchinson, G. O. (ed.) (1985) Seven Against Thebes. Oxford.Google Scholar

Indelli, G. (2004) “The vocabulary of anger in Philodemus' De ira and Vergil's Aeneid,” in Vergil, Philodemus, and the Augustans, eds. Armstrong, D., Fish, J., Johnston, P. A., and Skinner, M.. Austin, TX: 103–10.Google Scholar

Jackson, R. (1981) Fantasy: The Literature of Subversion. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jakobsen, H. (1974) Ovid's Heroides. Princeton.Google Scholar

Jenkyns, R. (1985) “Pathos, tragedy and hope in the Aeneid,” Journal of Roman Studies 75: 60–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, W. R. (1976) Darkness Visible: A Study of Vergil's Aeneid. Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Juhnke, H. (1972) Homerisches in römischer Epik flavischer Zeit. Munich.Google Scholar

Keith, A. (2000) Engendering Rome: Women in Latin Epic. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keith, A. (2002) “Ovidian personae in Statius' Thebaid,” Arethusa 35: 381–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klinnert, T. C. (1970) Capaneus-Hippomedon: Interpretationen zur Heldendarstellung in der Thebais des P. Papinius Statius, diss., Berlin.Google Scholar

Knauer, G. N. (1964) Die Aeneis und Homer: Studien zur poetischen Technik Vergils mit Listen der Homerzitate in der Aeneis. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Knox, P. (ed.) (1995) Ovid, Heroides: Selected Epistles. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Köhne, E. and Ewigleben, C. (eds.) (2000) Gladiators and Caesars. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Kroll, J. (1932) Gott und Hölle. Berlin and Leipzig.Google Scholar

Krumbholz, G. (1955) “Der Erzählungsstil in der Thebais des Statius,” Glotta 34: 93–139, 231–60.Google Scholar

Kyle, D. (1998) Spectacles of Death in Ancient Rome. London.Google Scholar

Kytzler, B. (1960) “Beobachtungen zum Prooemium der Thebais,” Hermes 88: 331–54.Google Scholar

Kytzler, B. (1969) “Imitatio und aemulatio in der Thebais des Statius,” Hermes 97: 209–32.Google Scholar

Kytzler, B. (1986) “Zum Aufbau der statianischen Thebais. Pius Coroebus, Theb. 1.557–692,” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.32.5: 2913–24.Google Scholar

Lee, A. G. (ed.) (1953) M. Tulli Ciceronis Paradoxa Stoicorum. London.Google Scholar

Legras, L (1905) Etude sur la Thébaide de Stace. Paris.Google Scholar

Leigh, M. (1997) Lucan: Spectacle and Engagement. Oxford.Google Scholar

Lesueur, R. (ed.) (1990–4) Stace: Thébaïde, tr. (3 vols.). Paris.Google Scholar

Lesueur, R. (1992) “Les femmes dans la Thébaïde de Stace,” in L'univers épique: rencontres avec l'antiquité classique II, ed. Woronoff, M.. Paris: 229–43.Google Scholar

Lesueur, R. (1996) “La Thebaïde et ses deux voix: le politique et le privé,” in Epicedion: hommage à P. Papinius Statius (96–1996), eds. Delarue, F. S.GeorgacopoulouLaurens, P., and Taisne, A.-M.. Poitiers: 71–81.Google Scholar

Lesueur, R. (2003) “Claudia et la composition du livre Ⅻ de la Thébaïde de Stace,” Revue des études latines 81: 190–9.Google Scholar

Lewis, C. S. (1936) The Allegory of Love. Oxford.Google Scholar

Lovatt, H. (1999) “Competing endings: rereading the end of the Thebaid through Lucan,” Ramus 28: 126–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lovatt, H. (2002) “Statius' ekphrastic games: Thebaid 6.531–47,” Ramus 31: 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lovatt, H. (2005) Statius and Epic Games: Sport, Politics and Poetics in the Thebaid. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1987) Further Voices in Vergil's Aeneid. Oxford.Google Scholar

Malamud, M. (1995) “Happy birthday, dead Lucan: (p)raising the dead in Silvae 2.7,” Ramus 24: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mandelbaum, A. (1984) Purgatorio: A Verse Translation. New York.Google Scholar

Markus, D. (1997) “Transfiguring heroism: Nisus and Euryalus in Statius' Thebaid,” Vergilius 43: 56–62.Google Scholar

Markus, D. (2000) “Performing the book: the recital of epic in first-century CE Rome,” Classical Antiquity 19: 138–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Markus, D. (2003) “The politics of epic performance in Statius,” in Flavian Rome: Culture, Image, Text, eds. Boyle, A. J. and Dominik, W. J.. Leiden: 431–67.Google Scholar

Markus, D. (2004) “Grim pleasures: Statius's poetic consolationes,” Arethusa 37: 105–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Masters, J. (1992) Poetry and Civil War in Lucan's Bellum Civile. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Mastronarde, D. (ed.) (1994) Euripides: Phoenissae. Cambridge.Google Scholar

McGuire, Jr., D. T. (1990) “Textual strategies and political suicide in Flavian epic,” in The Imperial Muse: Ramus Essays on Roman Literature of the Empire, II: Flavian Epicist to Claudian, ed. Boyle, A. J.. Bendigo: 21–45.Google Scholar

McGuire, D. T. Jr. (1997) Acts of Silence: Civil War, Tyranny, and Suicide in the Flavian Epics. Hildesheim.Google Scholar

McNelis, C. (2004) “Middle-march: Statius' Thebaid and the beginning of battle narrative,” in Middles in Latin Poetry, eds. Kyriakidis, S. and Martino, F.. Bari: 261–309.Google Scholar

Melville, A. D. (1992) Statius: Thebaid. Oxford.Google Scholar

Michels, A. K. (1967) The Calendar of the Roman Republic. Princeton.Google Scholar

Moreland, F. L. (1975) “The role of darkness in Statius: a reading of Thebaid I,” Classical Journal 70. 4: 20–31.Google Scholar

Morgan, L. (1998) “Assimilation and civil war: Hercules and Cacus (Aen. 8.185–267),” in Vergil's Aeneid: Augustan Epic and Political Context, ed. Stahl, H.-P.. London: 175–97.Google Scholar

Most, G. W. (1992) “Disiecti membra poetae: the rhetoric of dismemberment in Neronian poetry,” in Innovations of Antiquity, eds. Hexter, R. and Selden, D.. New York: 391–419.Google Scholar

Mynors, R. A. B. (ed.) (1969) P. Vergili Maronis Opera. Oxford.Google Scholar

Nagle, B. R. (1983) “Byblis and Myrrha: two incest narratives in the Metamorphoses,” Classical Journal 78: 301–15.Google Scholar

Newlands, C. (2002) Statius' Silvae and the Poetics of Empire. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newlands, C. (2004) “Statius and Ovid: transforming the landscape,” TAPA 134: 133–55.Google Scholar

Newmyer, S. (1995) Review of Dominik (1994), BMCR 4. 6: 189–93.Google Scholar

Noreña, C. F. (2001) “The communication of the emperor's virtues,” Journal of Roman Studies 91: 146–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nugent, S. G. (1996) “Statius' Hypsipyle: following in the footsteps of the Aeneid,” Scholia 5: 46–71.Google Scholar

Ogden, D. (2001) Greek and Roman Necromancy. Princeton.Google Scholar

Ogilvie, R. M. (1980) Roman Literature and Society. Brighton.Google Scholar

Hara, O' J. J. (1990) Death and the Optimistic Prophecy in Vergil's Aeneid. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Higgins, O' D. (1988) “Lucan as vates,” Classical Antiquity 7: 208–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Opelt, I. (1972) “Senecas Konzeption des Tragischen,” in Senecas Tragödien, ed. Lefèvre, E.. Darmstadt: 92–128.Google Scholar

Pagán, V. (2000) “The mourning after: Statius, Thebaid 12,” AJPh 121: 423–52.Google Scholar

Parry, A. (1963) “The two voices of Virgil's Aeneid,” Arion 2: 66–80.Google Scholar

Pfeiffer, R. (1949) Callimachus, vol. I. Oxford.Google Scholar

Plass, P. (1995) The Game of Death in Ancient Rome. Madison, WI.Google Scholar

Pollmann, K. (2001) “Statius' Thebaid and the legacy of Vergil's Aeneid,” Mnemosyne 54. 1: 10–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pollmann, K. (2004) Statius, Thebaid 12: Introduction, Text, and Commentary. Paderborn.Google Scholar

Pollmann, K.(forthcoming) “Dislocating morality: virtus, fides, and pietas in Statius' Thebaid.”

Poortvliet, H. M. (1991) C. Valerius Flaccus, Argonautica, Book II: A Commentary. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Pöschl, V. (1962) The Art of Vergil: Image and Symbol in the Aeneid, tr. G Seligson. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

Putnam, M. (1965) The Poetry of the Aeneid. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Putnam, M. (1984) “The hesitation of Aeneas,” Atti del Convegno Mondiale Scientifico di Studi su Virgilio 2: 233–52, reprinted in Putnam (1995): 152–71.Google Scholar

Putnam, M. (1995) Virgil's Aeneid: Interpretation and Influence. Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar

Quint, D. (1993) Epic and Empire. Princeton.Google Scholar

Ramelli, I. (1999) “La concezione del divino in Stazio e la conversione del poeta secondo Dante,” Gerión 17: 417–32.Google Scholar

Ripoll, F. (1998) La morale héroïque dans les épopées latines d'époque flavienne: tradition et innovation. Louvain and Paris.Google Scholar

Roller, M. (2001) Constructing Autocracy: Aristocrats and Emperors in Julio-Claudian Rome. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ross, C. S. (2004) The Thebaid: Seven Against Thebes. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Rossi, A. (2004) Contexts of War: Manipulation of Genre in Virgilian Battle Narrative. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Schetter, W. (1960) Untersuchungen zur epischen Kunst des P. Papinius Statius. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Schetter, W. (1962) “Die Einheit des Prooemium zur Thebais des Statius,” Museum Helveticum 19: 204–17.Google Scholar

Schiesaro, A. (1992) “Forms of Senecan intertextuality,” Vergilius 38: 56–63.Google Scholar

Schiesaro, A. (1994) “Seneca's Thyestes and the morality of tragic furor,” in Reflections of Nero, eds. Elsner, J. and Masters, J.. Chapel Hill, NC: 196–210.Google Scholar

Schiesaro, A. (2003) The Passions in Play. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schubert, W. (1984) Jupiter in den Epen der Flavierzeit. Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Segal, C. (1971) The Theme of the Mutilation of the Corpse in the Iliad. Leiden.Google Scholar

Segal, C. (1992) “Philomela's web and the pleasures of the text: Ovid's myth of Tereus in the Metamorphoses,” in The Two Worlds of the Poet: New Perspectives on Vergil, eds. Wilhelm, R. and Jones, H.. Detroit, MI: 281–95.Google Scholar

Shackleton, Bailey D. R. (2003) Statius (3 vols.). Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Sklenár, R. (2003) The Taste for Nothingness. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smolenaars, J. J. L. (ed.) (1994) Statius, Thebaid VII: A Commentary. Leiden.Google Scholar

Snijder, H. (ed.) (1968) P. Papinius Statius, Thebaid: A Commentary on Book III with Text and Translation. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Stahl, H.-P. (1990) “The death of Turnus: Augustan Vergil and the political rival,” in Between Republic and Empire: Interpretations of Augustus and his Principate, eds. Raaflaub, K. and Toher, M.. Berkeley: 174–211.Google Scholar

Taisne, A.-M. (1991) “Une scène de necromancie à Thèbes chez Stace (Th. IV, 406–645) d'après Sénèque le dramaturge (Oed., 530–659),” in Présence de Sénèque, eds. Chevallier, R. and Poignault, R.. Paris: 257–72.Google Scholar

Taisne, A.-M. (1994) L'esthétique de Stace: la peinture des correspondances. Paris.Google Scholar

Ten, Kate R. (1955) Quomodo Heroes in Statii Thebaide Describantur Quaeritur. Gronigen.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. (2001) Virgil and the Augustan Reception. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tissol, G. (1997) The Face of Nature: Wit, Narrative, and Cosmic Origins in Ovid's Metamorphoses. Princeton.Google Scholar

Todorov, T. (1975) The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre, tr. R. Howard. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Traina, A. (1988) “Pietas,” in Enciclopedia Virgiliana, vol. IV. Rome: 93–101.Google Scholar

Trypanis, C. and Gelzer, T. (eds.) (1958) Callimachus and Musaeus. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Venini, P. (1961a) “Studi sulla Tebaide di Stazio: la composizione,” Rendiconti dell'Istituto Lombardo, Classe di Lettere, Scienze morali e storiche 95: 55–88.Google Scholar

Venini, P. (1961b) “Studi sulla Tebaide di Stazio: l'imitazione,” Rendiconti dell'Istituto Lombardo, Classe di Lettere, Scienze morali e storiche 95: 371–400.Google Scholar

Venini, P. (1964) “Furor e psicologia nella Tebaide di Stazio,” Athenaeum 42: 201–13.Google Scholar

Venini, P. (1965a) “Echi senecani e lucanei nella Tebaide: tiranni e tirannidi,” Rendiconti dell'Istituto Lombardo, Classe di Lettere, Scienze morali e storiche 99: 157–67.Google Scholar

Venini, P. (1965b) “Echi Lucanei nel l. Ⅺ della Tebaide,” Rendiconti dell'Istituto Lombardo, Classe di Lettere, Scienze morali e storiche 99: 149–56.Google Scholar

Venini, P. (1970) (ed.) P. Papini Stati Thebaidos liber Ⅺ: introduzione, testo critico, commento e traduzione. Florence.Google Scholar

Versnel, H. S. (1976) “Two types of Roman devotio,” Mnemosyne 29: 365–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Versnel, H. S. (1981) “Self-sacrifice, compensation and the anonymous gods,” in Le sacrifice dans l'antiquité, ed. Vernant, J.-P.. Geneva: 135–94.Google Scholar

Vessey, D. W. T. (1971a) “Noxia tela: some innovations in Statius, Thebaid 7 and 11,” CPh 66: 87–92.Google Scholar

Vessey, D. W. T. (1971b) “Menoeceus in the Thebaid of Statius,” CPh 66: 236–43.Google Scholar

Vessey, D. W. T. (1971c) “Exitiale genus: some notes on Statius, Thebaid I,” Latomus 30: 375–82.Google Scholar

Vessey, D. W. T. (1973) Statius and the Thebaid. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Vessey, D. W. T. (1986) “Pierius menti calor incidit: Statius' epic style,” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.32. 5: 2965–3019.Google Scholar

Walde, A. and Hoffman, J. B. (1965) Lateinisches etymologisches Wörterbuch, vol. I, A–L. Heidelburg.Google Scholar

Warmington, E. H. (ed.) (1935–40) Remains of Old Latin (4 vols.). Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Watson, L. (1991) Arae: The Curse Poetry of Antiquity. Wiltshire.Google Scholar

Weinstock, S. (1971) Divus Julius. Oxford.Google Scholar

West, M. L. (ed.) (2003) Greek Epic Fragments: From the Seventh to Fifth Centuries BC. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Wiedemann, T. (1992) Emperors and Gladiators. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, G. W. (1978) Change and Decline: Roman Literature in the Early Empire. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Williams, G. W. (1986) “Statius and Vergil: defensive imitation,” in Vergil at 2000: Commemorative Essays on the Poet and His Influence, ed. Bernard, J.. New York: 207–24.Google Scholar

Williams, R. D. (ed.) (1972) Papini Stati Thebaidos Liber Decimus. Leiden.Google Scholar

Wolff, H. J. (1951) Roman Law: An Historical Introduction. Norman, OK.Google Scholar

Wright, M. R. (1997) “‘Ferox uirtus’: anger in Virgil's Aeneid,” in The Passions in Roman Thought and Literature, eds. Braund, S. M. and Gill, C.. Cambridge: 169–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zeitlin, F. I. (1990) “Thebes: theater of self and society in Athenian drama,” in Nothing to Do With Dionysos?: Athenian Drama in its Social Context, eds. Winkler, J. and Zeitlin, F.. Princeton: 130–67.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1982) The Latin Sexual Vocabulary. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Ahl, F. M. (1984) “The art of safe criticism in Greece and Rome,” AJPh 105: 174–208.Google Scholar

Ahl, F. M. (1986) “Statius' Thebaid: a reconsideration,” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.32. 5: 2803–912.Google Scholar

Allen, G. (2000) Intertextuality. London.Google Scholar

Anderson, W. S. (1997) Ovid's Metamorphoses: Books 1–5. Norman, OK.Google Scholar

Aricò, G. (1960) “Sul mito di Lino e Corebo in Stazio, Tebaide 1.557–668,” Rivista di filologiae e di istruzione classica 88: 277–85.Google Scholar

Aricò, G. (1961) “Stazio e L'Ipsipile euripidea: note sull'imitazione staziana,” Dioniso 35. 3–4: 56–67, reprinted in Aricò (1972): 85–98.Google Scholar

Aricò, G. (1972) Ricerche staziane. Palermo.Google Scholar

Aricò, G. (1991) “La vicenda di Lemno in Stazio e Valerio Flacco,” in Ratis Omnia Vincet: Untersuchungen zu den Argonautica des Valerius Flaccus, eds. Matthias, K. and Tschiedel, H. J.. Heldesheim: 197–210.Google Scholar

Austin, R. G. (ed.) (1964) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Secundus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bal, M. (1997) Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative, 2nd edn. Toronto.Google Scholar

Bannon, C. J. (1997) The Brothers of Romulus: Fraternal Pietas in Roman Law, Literature, and Society. Princeton.

Barchiesi, A. (1984) La traccia del modello: effetti omerici nella narrazione virgiliana. Pisa.Google Scholar

Barton, C. A. (1993) The Sorrows of the Ancient Romans. Princeton.Google Scholar

Bartsch, S. (1994) Actors in the Audience: Theatricality and Doublespeak from Nero to Hadrian. Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beacham, R. C. (1999) Spectacle Entertainments of Early Imperial Rome. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar

Beard, M., North, J., and Price, S. (1998) Religions of Rome, vol. 1: A History. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bernstein, N. W. (2003) “Ancestors, status, and self-presentation in Statius' Thebaid,” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 133: 353–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernstein, N. W. (2004) “Auferte oculos: modes of spectatorship in Statius, Thebaid 11,” Phoenix 58: 62–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berres, T. (1992) Vergil und die Helenaszene mit einem Exkurs zu den Halbversen. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Billerbeck, M. (1986) “Stoizismus in der römischen Epik der neronischer und flavischer Zeit,” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.36.5: 3116–51.Google Scholar

Bömer, F. (ed.) (1976) P. Ovidius Naso. Metamorphosen. Buch IV–V. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Bond, G. W. (ed.) (1963) Hypsipyle. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bramble, J. (1982) “Lucan,” in The Cambridge History of Classical Literature II: Latin Literature, eds. Kenney, E. J. and Clausen, W. V.. Cambridge: 533–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braund, S. M. (1996) “Ending epic: Statius, Theseus and a merciful release,” PCPhS 42: 1–23.Google Scholar

Braund, S. M. and Gilbert, G. (2003) “An ABC of epic ira: anger, beasts, and cannibalism,” in Ancient Anger: Perspectives from Homer to Galen (YClS vol. XXⅫ), eds. Braund, S. M. and Most, G.. Cambridge: 250–85.Google Scholar

Brooks, P. (1984) Reading for the Plot. New York.Google Scholar

Brown, J. (1994) “Into the woods: narrative studies in the Thebaid of Statius with special reference to books IV–VI,” diss., Cambridge.Google Scholar

Burgess, J. F. (1971–2) “Pietas in Virgil and Statius,” Proceedings of the Virgil Society 11: 48–61.Google Scholar

Burgess, J. F. (1972) “Statius' altar of Mercy,” Classical Quarterly 22: 339–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, H. E. (1909) Post-Augustan Poetry from Seneca to Juvenal. Oxford.Google Scholar

Cairns, F. (1989) Virgil's Augustan Epic. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carrara, P. (1986) “Stazio e i primordia di Tebe: poetica e polemica nel prologo della Tebaide,” Prometheus 12: 146–58.Google Scholar

Carroll, N. (1990) The Philosophy of Horror. London.Google Scholar

Caviglia, F. (ed.) (1973) La Tebaide: Libro I. Rome.Google Scholar

Clausen, W. (1987) Virgil's Aeneid and the Tradition of Hellenistic Poetry. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Coleman, K. M. (1986) “The emperor Domitian and literature,” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.32. 5: 3087–115.Google Scholar

Coleman, K. M. (1990) “Fatal charades: Roman executions staged as mythological enactments,” Journal of Roman Studies 80: 44–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1986) The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets, tr. C. Segal. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Criado, C. (2000) La teología de la Tebaida Estaciana: el anti-virgilianismo de un clasicista. Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Davies, M. (1989) The Epic Cycle. Bristol.Google Scholar

Delarue, F. (2000) Stace, poète, épique: originalité et cohérence. Louvain and Paris.Google Scholar

Dewar, M. (ed.) (1991) Statius: Thebaid IX. Oxford.Google Scholar

Dietrich, J. (1999) “Thebaid's feminine ending,” Ramus 28: 40–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dihle, A. (1994) Greek and Roman Literature of the Roman Empire: From Augustus to Justinian, tr. M. Malzahn. London and New York.Google Scholar

Dodds, E. R. (ed.) (1960) Euripides: Bacchae. Oxford.Google Scholar

Dominik, W. J. (1990) “Monarchal power and imperial politics in Statius' Thebaid,” in The Imperial Muse: Ramus Essays on Roman Literature of the Empire, II: Flavian Epicist to Claudian, ed. A. J. Boyle. Bendigo: 74–97.Google Scholar

Dominik, W. J. (1994a) The Mythic Voice of Statius: Power and Politics in the Thebaid. Leiden.Google Scholar

Dominik, W. J. (1994b) Speech and Rhetoric in Statius' Thebaid. Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Dominik, W. J. (1997) “Ratio et dei: psychology and the supernatural in the Lemnian episode,” in Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History VIII (Collection Latomus 239), ed. Brussels, C. Deroux.: 29–50.Google Scholar

Dominik, W. J. (2003) “Following in whose footsteps?: the epilogue to Statius' Thebaid,” in Literature, Art, History: Studies on Classical Antiquity and Tradition in Honour of W. J. Henderson, eds. Basson, A. F. and Dominik, W. J.. New York: 91–109.Google Scholar

Douglas, M. (1966) Purity and Danger. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edmunds, L. (2001) Intertextuality and the Reading of Roman Poetry. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Edwards, M. W. (1991) The Iliad: A Commentary, vol. V: Books 17–20. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Egan, R. B. (1996) “A reading of the Helen–Venus episode in Aeneid 2,” Echos du monde classique 40, n.s. 15: 379–95.Google Scholar

Erler, M. (1992) “Der Zorn des Helden, Philodems ‘De Ira’ and Vergil's Konzept des Zorns in der ‘Aeneis,’” Grazer Beiträge: Zeitschrift für die klassische Altertumswissenschaft 18: 103–26.Google Scholar

Ernout, A. (1959) Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine: histoire des mots. Paris.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (1983), “Nihil iam iura naturae valent: incest and fratricide in Seneca's Phoenissae,” in Seneca Tragicus: Ramus Essays on Senecan Drama, ed. Boyle, A. J.. Berwick and Victoria, Australia: 61–76.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (1995) “The ambiguity of Virtus in Lucan's Civil War and Statius' Thebaid,” Arachnion3: http://www.cisi.unito.it/arachne/num3/fantham.html.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (1997) “‘Envy and fear the begetter of hate’: Statius' Thebaid and the genesis of hatred,” in The Passions in Roman Thought and Literature, eds. Braund, S. M. and Gill, C.. Cambridge: 185–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fantham, E. (2003) “The angry poet and the angry gods: problems of theodicy in Lucan's epic of defeat,” in Ancient Anger: Perspectives from Homer to Galen (YClS vol. XXⅫ), eds. Braund, S. M. and Most, G.. Cambridge: 229–49.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (1991) Vergil's Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic: The Art of Allusion in Literary History. Oxford.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. (1984) “The reconciliations of Juno,” Classical Quarterly n.s. 34: 179–94, reprinted in Oxford Readings in Vergil's Aeneid, ed. Harrison, S. J. (1990). Oxford: 339–62.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. (1986) “History and revelation in Vergil's underworld,” PCPhS 32: 1–24.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. (1991) The Gods in Epic: Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition. Oxford.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. (1999) “Epic violence, epic order: killings, catalogues, and the role of the reader in Aeneid 10,” in Reading Vergil's Aeneid: An Interpretive Guide, ed. Perkell, C.. Norman, OK: 178–94.Google Scholar

Feldherr, A. (1998) Spectacle and Society in Livy's History. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Fernandelli, M. (2000) “Statius' Thebaid 4.165–72 and Euripides' Phoenissae 1113–18,” Symbolae Osloenses 75: 89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fish, J. (2004) “Anger, Philodemus' good king, and the Helen episode of Aeneid 2.567–589: a new proof of authenticity from Herculaneum,” in Vergil, Philodemus, and the Augustans, eds. Armstrong, D., Fish, J., Johnston, P. A., and Skinner, M.. Austin, TX: 111–38.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. (1990) “Deviant focalisation in Virgil's Aeneid,” PCPhS 36: 42–63.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. (1997a) “On the shoulders of giants: intertextuality and Classical studies,” Materiali e discussioni per l'analisi dei testi classici 39: 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fowler, D. (1997b) “Epicurean anger,” in The Passions in Roman Thought and Literature, eds. Braund, S. M. and Gill, C.. Cambridge: 16–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fowler, D. (2001) “Introduction,” in Texts, Ideas, and the Classics: Scholarship, Theory, and Classical Literature, ed. Harrison, S. J.. Oxford: 65–9.Google Scholar

Franchet, d'Espèrey S. (1977) “Variations épiques sur un thème animalier,” Revue des études latines 55: 157–72.Google Scholar

Franchet, d'Espèrey S. (1986) “Vespasien, Titus et la litérature,” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.32. 5: 3048–86.Google Scholar

Franchet, d'Espèrey S. (1999) Conflit, violence et non-violence dans la Thébaïde de Stace. Paris.Google Scholar

Franchet, d'Espèrey S. (2001) “La causalité dans le chant 1 de la Thébaïde de Stace: où commence la Thébaïde?,” Revue des études latines 79: 188–200.Google Scholar

Frank, M. (ed.) (1995) Seneca's Phoenissae: Introduction and Commentary. Leiden.Google Scholar

Freeland, C. (2000) The Naked and the Undead: Evil and the Appeal of Horror. Boulder, CO.Google Scholar

Frings, I. (1991) Gespräch und Handlung in der Thebais des Statius. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Frings, I. (1996) “Hypsipyle und Aeneas: zur Vergilimitation in Thebais V,” in Epicedion: hommage à P. Papinius Statius (96–1996), eds. Delarue, F., Georgacopoulou, S., Laurens, P., and Taisne, A.-M.. Poitiers: 145–60.Google Scholar

Gale, M. (2000) Virgil on the Nature of Things: The Georgics, Lucretius and the Didactic Tradition. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galinsky, K. (1966) “The Hercules-Cacus episode in Aeneid VIII,” AJPh 87: 18–51.Google Scholar

Galinsky, K. (1988) “The anger of Aeneas,” AJPh 109: 321–48.Google Scholar

Galinsky, K. (1994) “How to be philosophical about the end of the Aeneid,” Illinois Classical Studies 19: 191–201.Google Scholar

Galinsky, K. (1996) Augustan Culture. Princeton.Google Scholar

Gantz, T. (1993) Early Greek Myth: A Guide to Literary and Artistic Sources. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Garrod, H. W. (ed.) (1906) P. Papini Stati: Thebais et Achilleis. Oxford.Google Scholar

Georgacopoulou, S. (1996a) “Jeu d'ironie tragique et jeu de voix à la fin du livre 2 de la Thébaïde de Stace,” Echos du monde classique 40, n.s. 15: 275–81.Google Scholar

Georgacopoulou, S. (1996b) “Ranger/déranger: catalogues et listes de personages dans la Thébaïde,” in Epicedion: hommage à P. Papinius Statius (96–1996), eds. Delarue, F., Georgacopoulou, S., Laurens, P., and Taisne, A.-M.. Poitiers: 83–129.Google Scholar

Georgacopoulou, S. (1998) “Les Erinyes et le narrateur épique ou la métamorphose impossible (Stace Theb. 11.576–579),” Phoenix 52: 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gill, C. (1997) “Passion as madness in Roman poetry,” in The Passions in Roman Thought and Literature, eds. Braund, S. M. and Gill, C.. Cambridge: 213–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gill, C. (2003) “Reactive and objective attitudes: anger in Virgil's Aeneid and Hellenistic philosophy,” in Ancient Anger: Perspectives from Homer to Galen (YClS vol. XXⅫ), eds. Braund, S. M. and Most, G.. Cambridge: 208–28.Google Scholar

Glare, P. G. W. (ed.) (1962–82) Oxford Latin Dictionary. Oxford.

Goold, G. P. (1970) “Servius and the Helen episode,” HSCPh 74: 101–68, reprinted in Oxford Readings in Vergil's Aeneid, ed. Harrison, S. J. (1990). Oxford: 60–126.Google Scholar

Gossage, A. J. (1969) “Virgil and the Flavian epic,” in Virgil, ed. Dudley, D. R.. London: 67–93.Google Scholar

Gransden, K. W. (ed.) (1976) Virgil: Aeneid Book VIII. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gransden, K. W. (1984) Virgil's Iliad: An Essay on Epic Narrative. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. (2000) “The Flavians,” in The Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 11: The High Empire, AD 70–192, eds. Bowman, A., Garnsey, P., and Rathbone, D.. Cambridge: 1–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffin, M. (2003) “Clementia after Caesar: from politics to philosophy,” in Caesar against Liberty?: Perspectives on his Autocracy. Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar vol. Ⅺ, eds. Cairns, F. and Fantham, R. E.. Cambridge: 157–82.Google Scholar

Gruzelier, C. (1994) “The influence of Virgil's Dido on Statius' portrayal of Hypsipyle,” Prudentia 26. 1: 153–65.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1986) Virgil's Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1990a) “Flavian epicists on Virgil's epic technique,” in The Imperial Muse: Ramus Essays on Roman Literature of the Empire, II: Flavian Epicist to Claudian, ed. Boyle, A. J.. Bendigo: 3–20.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1990b) “Ovid's Theban history: the first ‘Anti-Aeneid’?,” Classical Quarterly n.s. 40: 224–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1993) The Epic Successors of Virgil: A Study in the Dynamics of a Tradition. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R.(ed.) (1994) Virgil: Aeneid Book IX. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1997) “Closure in Latin epic,” in Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature, eds. Roberts, D. H., Dunn, F. M., and Fowler, D.. Princeton: 139–62.Google Scholar

Hardie, W. R. (1916) “Virgil, Statius and Dante,” Journal of Roman Studies 6: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, S. J. (ed.) (1991) Vergil: Aeneid 10. Oxford.Google Scholar

Harrison, S. J. (1998) “The sword-belt of Pallas: moral symbolism and political ideology (Aen. 10.495–505),” in Vergil's Aeneid: Augustan Epic and Political Context, ed. Stahl, H.-P.. London: 223–42.Google Scholar

Heinrich, A. (1999) “Longa retro series: sacrifice and repetition in Statius' Menoeceus episode,” Arethusa 32. 2: 165–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heinze, R. (1993) Virgil's Epic Technique, tr. H. Harvey, D. Harvey, and F. Robertson. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Heller, T. (1987) The Delights of Terror: An Aesthetics of the Tale of Terror. Champaign, IL.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (1988) “Lucan/the word at war,” in The Imperial Muse: Ramus Essays on Roman Literature of the Empire, vol. I: To Juvenal through Ovid, ed. Boyle, A. J.. Victoria, Australia: 122–64.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (1991) “Statius' Thebaid/form premade,” PCPhS 37: 30–80.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (1993) “Form remade/Statius' Thebaid,” in Roman Epic, ed. Boyle, A. J.. London and New York: 162–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henderson, J. (1994) “To recognise Bosnia/Statius, Thebaid 11.407–8,” Liverpool Classical Monthly 19. 2: 25–7.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (1998) Fighting for Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hershkowitz, D. (1995) “Patterns of madness in Statius' Thebaid,” Journal of Roman Studies 85: 52–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hershkowitz, D. (1997) “‘Parce metu, Cytherea’: ‘failed’ intertext repetition in Statius' Thebaid, or, don't stop me if you've heard this one before,” Materiali e discussioni per l'analisi dei testi classici 39: 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hershkowitz, D. (1998a) The Madness of Epic: Reading Insanity from Homer to Statius. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hershkowitz, D. (1998b) Valerius Flaccus' Argonautica. Oxford.Google Scholar

Heuvel, H. (ed.) (1932) Papinii Statii Thebaidos Liber Primus. Zutphen.Google Scholar

Hill, D. E. (1990) “Statius' Thebaid: a glimmer of light in a sea of darkness,” in The Imperial Muse: Ramus Essays on Roman Literature of the Empire, II: Flavian Epicist to Claudian, ed. A. J. Boyle. Bendigo: 98–118.Google Scholar

Hill, D. E.(ed.) (1996a) P. Papini Stati Thebaidos Libri Ⅻ, 2nd edn. Leiden.Google Scholar

Hill, D. E. (1996b) “Thebaid I revisited,” in Epicedion: hommage à P. Papinius Statius (96–1996), eds. Delarue, F., Georgacopoulou, S., Laurens, P., and Taisne, A.-M.. Poitiers: 35–54.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. (1998) Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, M. (1999) Statius, Thebais 12,312–463: Einleitung, Übersetzung, Kommentar. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Hopkins, K. (1983) Death and Renewal: Sociological Studies in Roman History, vol. II. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horsfall, N. (ed.) (2000) Virgil, Aeneid 7: A Commentary. Leiden.Google Scholar

Hübner, W. (1970) Dirae in römischen Epos. Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. (1993) The Argonautica of Apollonius: Literary Studies. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutchinson, G. O. (ed.) (1985) Seven Against Thebes. Oxford.Google Scholar

Indelli, G. (2004) “The vocabulary of anger in Philodemus' De ira and Vergil's Aeneid,” in Vergil, Philodemus, and the Augustans, eds. Armstrong, D., Fish, J., Johnston, P. A., and Skinner, M.. Austin, TX: 103–10.Google Scholar

Jackson, R. (1981) Fantasy: The Literature of Subversion. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jakobsen, H. (1974) Ovid's Heroides. Princeton.Google Scholar

Jenkyns, R. (1985) “Pathos, tragedy and hope in the Aeneid,” Journal of Roman Studies 75: 60–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, W. R. (1976) Darkness Visible: A Study of Vergil's Aeneid. Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Juhnke, H. (1972) Homerisches in römischer Epik flavischer Zeit. Munich.Google Scholar

Keith, A. (2000) Engendering Rome: Women in Latin Epic. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keith, A. (2002) “Ovidian personae in Statius' Thebaid,” Arethusa 35: 381–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klinnert, T. C. (1970) Capaneus-Hippomedon: Interpretationen zur Heldendarstellung in der Thebais des P. Papinius Statius, diss., Berlin.Google Scholar

Knauer, G. N. (1964) Die Aeneis und Homer: Studien zur poetischen Technik Vergils mit Listen der Homerzitate in der Aeneis. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Knox, P. (ed.) (1995) Ovid, Heroides: Selected Epistles. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Köhne, E. and Ewigleben, C. (eds.) (2000) Gladiators and Caesars. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Kroll, J. (1932) Gott und Hölle. Berlin and Leipzig.Google Scholar

Krumbholz, G. (1955) “Der Erzählungsstil in der Thebais des Statius,” Glotta 34: 93–139, 231–60.Google Scholar

Kyle, D. (1998) Spectacles of Death in Ancient Rome. London.Google Scholar

Kytzler, B. (1960) “Beobachtungen zum Prooemium der Thebais,” Hermes 88: 331–54.Google Scholar

Kytzler, B. (1969) “Imitatio und aemulatio in der Thebais des Statius,” Hermes 97: 209–32.Google Scholar

Kytzler, B. (1986) “Zum Aufbau der statianischen Thebais. Pius Coroebus, Theb. 1.557–692,” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.32.5: 2913–24.Google Scholar

Lee, A. G. (ed.) (1953) M. Tulli Ciceronis Paradoxa Stoicorum. London.Google Scholar

Legras, L (1905) Etude sur la Thébaide de Stace. Paris.Google Scholar

Leigh, M. (1997) Lucan: Spectacle and Engagement. Oxford.Google Scholar

Lesueur, R. (ed.) (1990–4) Stace: Thébaïde, tr. (3 vols.). Paris.Google Scholar

Lesueur, R. (1992) “Les femmes dans la Thébaïde de Stace,” in L'univers épique: rencontres avec l'antiquité classique II, ed. Woronoff, M.. Paris: 229–43.Google Scholar

Lesueur, R. (1996) “La Thebaïde et ses deux voix: le politique et le privé,” in Epicedion: hommage à P. Papinius Statius (96–1996), eds. Delarue, F. S.GeorgacopoulouLaurens, P., and Taisne, A.-M.. Poitiers: 71–81.Google Scholar

Lesueur, R. (2003) “Claudia et la composition du livre Ⅻ de la Thébaïde de Stace,” Revue des études latines 81: 190–9.Google Scholar

Lewis, C. S. (1936) The Allegory of Love. Oxford.Google Scholar

Lovatt, H. (1999) “Competing endings: rereading the end of the Thebaid through Lucan,” Ramus 28: 126–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lovatt, H. (2002) “Statius' ekphrastic games: Thebaid 6.531–47,” Ramus 31: 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lovatt, H. (2005) Statius and Epic Games: Sport, Politics and Poetics in the Thebaid. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1987) Further Voices in Vergil's Aeneid. Oxford.Google Scholar

Malamud, M. (1995) “Happy birthday, dead Lucan: (p)raising the dead in Silvae 2.7,” Ramus 24: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mandelbaum, A. (1984) Purgatorio: A Verse Translation. New York.Google Scholar

Markus, D. (1997) “Transfiguring heroism: Nisus and Euryalus in Statius' Thebaid,” Vergilius 43: 56–62.Google Scholar

Markus, D. (2000) “Performing the book: the recital of epic in first-century CE Rome,” Classical Antiquity 19: 138–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Markus, D. (2003) “The politics of epic performance in Statius,” in Flavian Rome: Culture, Image, Text, eds. Boyle, A. J. and Dominik, W. J.. Leiden: 431–67.Google Scholar

Markus, D. (2004) “Grim pleasures: Statius's poetic consolationes,” Arethusa 37: 105–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Masters, J. (1992) Poetry and Civil War in Lucan's Bellum Civile. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Mastronarde, D. (ed.) (1994) Euripides: Phoenissae. Cambridge.Google Scholar

McGuire, Jr., D. T. (1990) “Textual strategies and political suicide in Flavian epic,” in The Imperial Muse: Ramus Essays on Roman Literature of the Empire, II: Flavian Epicist to Claudian, ed. Boyle, A. J.. Bendigo: 21–45.Google Scholar

McGuire, D. T. Jr. (1997) Acts of Silence: Civil War, Tyranny, and Suicide in the Flavian Epics. Hildesheim.Google Scholar

McNelis, C. (2004) “Middle-march: Statius' Thebaid and the beginning of battle narrative,” in Middles in Latin Poetry, eds. Kyriakidis, S. and Martino, F.. Bari: 261–309.Google Scholar

Melville, A. D. (1992) Statius: Thebaid. Oxford.Google Scholar

Michels, A. K. (1967) The Calendar of the Roman Republic. Princeton.Google Scholar

Moreland, F. L. (1975) “The role of darkness in Statius: a reading of Thebaid I,” Classical Journal 70. 4: 20–31.Google Scholar

Morgan, L. (1998) “Assimilation and civil war: Hercules and Cacus (Aen. 8.185–267),” in Vergil's Aeneid: Augustan Epic and Political Context, ed. Stahl, H.-P.. London: 175–97.Google Scholar

Most, G. W. (1992) “Disiecti membra poetae: the rhetoric of dismemberment in Neronian poetry,” in Innovations of Antiquity, eds. Hexter, R. and Selden, D.. New York: 391–419.Google Scholar

Mynors, R. A. B. (ed.) (1969) P. Vergili Maronis Opera. Oxford.Google Scholar

Nagle, B. R. (1983) “Byblis and Myrrha: two incest narratives in the Metamorphoses,” Classical Journal 78: 301–15.Google Scholar

Newlands, C. (2002) Statius' Silvae and the Poetics of Empire. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newlands, C. (2004) “Statius and Ovid: transforming the landscape,” TAPA 134: 133–55.Google Scholar

Newmyer, S. (1995) Review of Dominik (1994), BMCR 4. 6: 189–93.Google Scholar

Noreña, C. F. (2001) “The communication of the emperor's virtues,” Journal of Roman Studies 91: 146–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nugent, S. G. (1996) “Statius' Hypsipyle: following in the footsteps of the Aeneid,” Scholia 5: 46–71.Google Scholar

Ogden, D. (2001) Greek and Roman Necromancy. Princeton.Google Scholar

Ogilvie, R. M. (1980) Roman Literature and Society. Brighton.Google Scholar

Hara, O' J. J. (1990) Death and the Optimistic Prophecy in Vergil's Aeneid. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Higgins, O' D. (1988) “Lucan as vates,” Classical Antiquity 7: 208–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Opelt, I. (1972) “Senecas Konzeption des Tragischen,” in Senecas Tragödien, ed. Lefèvre, E.. Darmstadt: 92–128.Google Scholar

Pagán, V. (2000) “The mourning after: Statius, Thebaid 12,” AJPh 121: 423–52.Google Scholar

Parry, A. (1963) “The two voices of Virgil's Aeneid,” Arion 2: 66–80.Google Scholar

Pfeiffer, R. (1949) Callimachus, vol. I. Oxford.Google Scholar

Plass, P. (1995) The Game of Death in Ancient Rome. Madison, WI.Google Scholar

Pollmann, K. (2001) “Statius' Thebaid and the legacy of Vergil's Aeneid,” Mnemosyne 54. 1: 10–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pollmann, K. (2004) Statius, Thebaid 12: Introduction, Text, and Commentary. Paderborn.Google Scholar

Pollmann, K.(forthcoming) “Dislocating morality: virtus, fides, and pietas in Statius' Thebaid.”

Poortvliet, H. M. (1991) C. Valerius Flaccus, Argonautica, Book II: A Commentary. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Pöschl, V. (1962) The Art of Vergil: Image and Symbol in the Aeneid, tr. G Seligson. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

Putnam, M. (1965) The Poetry of the Aeneid. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Putnam, M. (1984) “The hesitation of Aeneas,” Atti del Convegno Mondiale Scientifico di Studi su Virgilio 2: 233–52, reprinted in Putnam (1995): 152–71.Google Scholar

Putnam, M. (1995) Virgil's Aeneid: Interpretation and Influence. Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar

Quint, D. (1993) Epic and Empire. Princeton.Google Scholar

Ramelli, I. (1999) “La concezione del divino in Stazio e la conversione del poeta secondo Dante,” Gerión 17: 417–32.Google Scholar

Ripoll, F. (1998) La morale héroïque dans les épopées latines d'époque flavienne: tradition et innovation. Louvain and Paris.Google Scholar

Roller, M. (2001) Constructing Autocracy: Aristocrats and Emperors in Julio-Claudian Rome. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ross, C. S. (2004) The Thebaid: Seven Against Thebes. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Rossi, A. (2004) Contexts of War: Manipulation of Genre in Virgilian Battle Narrative. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Schetter, W. (1960) Untersuchungen zur epischen Kunst des P. Papinius Statius. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Schetter, W. (1962) “Die Einheit des Prooemium zur Thebais des Statius,” Museum Helveticum 19: 204–17.Google Scholar

Schiesaro, A. (1992) “Forms of Senecan intertextuality,” Vergilius 38: 56–63.Google Scholar

Schiesaro, A. (1994) “Seneca's Thyestes and the morality of tragic furor,” in Reflections of Nero, eds. Elsner, J. and Masters, J.. Chapel Hill, NC: 196–210.Google Scholar

Schiesaro, A. (2003) The Passions in Play. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schubert, W. (1984) Jupiter in den Epen der Flavierzeit. Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Segal, C. (1971) The Theme of the Mutilation of the Corpse in the Iliad. Leiden.Google Scholar

Segal, C. (1992) “Philomela's web and the pleasures of the text: Ovid's myth of Tereus in the Metamorphoses,” in The Two Worlds of the Poet: New Perspectives on Vergil, eds. Wilhelm, R. and Jones, H.. Detroit, MI: 281–95.Google Scholar

Shackleton, Bailey D. R. (2003) Statius (3 vols.). Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Sklenár, R. (2003) The Taste for Nothingness. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smolenaars, J. J. L. (ed.) (1994) Statius, Thebaid VII: A Commentary. Leiden.Google Scholar

Snijder, H. (ed.) (1968) P. Papinius Statius, Thebaid: A Commentary on Book III with Text and Translation. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Stahl, H.-P. (1990) “The death of Turnus: Augustan Vergil and the political rival,” in Between Republic and Empire: Interpretations of Augustus and his Principate, eds. Raaflaub, K. and Toher, M.. Berkeley: 174–211.Google Scholar

Taisne, A.-M. (1991) “Une scène de necromancie à Thèbes chez Stace (Th. IV, 406–645) d'après Sénèque le dramaturge (Oed., 530–659),” in Présence de Sénèque, eds. Chevallier, R. and Poignault, R.. Paris: 257–72.Google Scholar

Taisne, A.-M. (1994) L'esthétique de Stace: la peinture des correspondances. Paris.Google Scholar

Ten, Kate R. (1955) Quomodo Heroes in Statii Thebaide Describantur Quaeritur. Gronigen.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. (2001) Virgil and the Augustan Reception. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tissol, G. (1997) The Face of Nature: Wit, Narrative, and Cosmic Origins in Ovid's Metamorphoses. Princeton.Google Scholar

Todorov, T. (1975) The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre, tr. R. Howard. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Traina, A. (1988) “Pietas,” in Enciclopedia Virgiliana, vol. IV. Rome: 93–101.Google Scholar

Trypanis, C. and Gelzer, T. (eds.) (1958) Callimachus and Musaeus. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Venini, P. (1961a) “Studi sulla Tebaide di Stazio: la composizione,” Rendiconti dell'Istituto Lombardo, Classe di Lettere, Scienze morali e storiche 95: 55–88.Google Scholar

Venini, P. (1961b) “Studi sulla Tebaide di Stazio: l'imitazione,” Rendiconti dell'Istituto Lombardo, Classe di Lettere, Scienze morali e storiche 95: 371–400.Google Scholar

Venini, P. (1964) “Furor e psicologia nella Tebaide di Stazio,” Athenaeum 42: 201–13.Google Scholar

Venini, P. (1965a) “Echi senecani e lucanei nella Tebaide: tiranni e tirannidi,” Rendiconti dell'Istituto Lombardo, Classe di Lettere, Scienze morali e storiche 99: 157–67.Google Scholar

Venini, P. (1965b) “Echi Lucanei nel l. Ⅺ della Tebaide,” Rendiconti dell'Istituto Lombardo, Classe di Lettere, Scienze morali e storiche 99: 149–56.Google Scholar

Venini, P. (1970) (ed.) P. Papini Stati Thebaidos liber Ⅺ: introduzione, testo critico, commento e traduzione. Florence.Google Scholar

Versnel, H. S. (1976) “Two types of Roman devotio,” Mnemosyne 29: 365–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Versnel, H. S. (1981) “Self-sacrifice, compensation and the anonymous gods,” in Le sacrifice dans l'antiquité, ed. Vernant, J.-P.. Geneva: 135–94.Google Scholar

Vessey, D. W. T. (1971a) “Noxia tela: some innovations in Statius, Thebaid 7 and 11,” CPh 66: 87–92.Google Scholar

Vessey, D. W. T. (1971b) “Menoeceus in the Thebaid of Statius,” CPh 66: 236–43.Google Scholar

Vessey, D. W. T. (1971c) “Exitiale genus: some notes on Statius, Thebaid I,” Latomus 30: 375–82.Google Scholar

Vessey, D. W. T. (1973) Statius and the Thebaid. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Vessey, D. W. T. (1986) “Pierius menti calor incidit: Statius' epic style,” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.32. 5: 2965–3019.Google Scholar

Walde, A. and Hoffman, J. B. (1965) Lateinisches etymologisches Wörterbuch, vol. I, A–L. Heidelburg.Google Scholar

Warmington, E. H. (ed.) (1935–40) Remains of Old Latin (4 vols.). Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Watson, L. (1991) Arae: The Curse Poetry of Antiquity. Wiltshire.Google Scholar

Weinstock, S. (1971) Divus Julius. Oxford.Google Scholar

West, M. L. (ed.) (2003) Greek Epic Fragments: From the Seventh to Fifth Centuries BC. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Wiedemann, T. (1992) Emperors and Gladiators. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, G. W. (1978) Change and Decline: Roman Literature in the Early Empire. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Williams, G. W. (1986) “Statius and Vergil: defensive imitation,” in Vergil at 2000: Commemorative Essays on the Poet and His Influence, ed. Bernard, J.. New York: 207–24.Google Scholar

Williams, R. D. (ed.) (1972) Papini Stati Thebaidos Liber Decimus. Leiden.Google Scholar

Wolff, H. J. (1951) Roman Law: An Historical Introduction. Norman, OK.Google Scholar

Wright, M. R. (1997) “‘Ferox uirtus’: anger in Virgil's Aeneid,” in The Passions in Roman Thought and Literature, eds. Braund, S. M. and Gill, C.. Cambridge: 169–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zeitlin, F. I. (1990) “Thebes: theater of self and society in Athenian drama,” in Nothing to Do With Dionysos?: Athenian Drama in its Social Context, eds. Winkler, J. and Zeitlin, F.. Princeton: 130–67.Google Scholar