Abbott, F. F. (1909), ‘Vulgar Latin in the Ars Consentⅱ de barbarismis’, CP 4, 233–47.Google Scholar

Acquati, A. (1971), ‘Il vocalismo latino-volgare nelle iscrizioni africane’, Acme 24, 155–84.Google Scholar

Adamik, T. (1987), ‘Romaniane vivat (Bemerkungen zum Gebrauch des Vokativs und zur afrikanischen Latinität)’, in Herman (1987), 1–9.

Adams, J. N. (1976), The Text and Language of a Vulgar Latin Chronicle (Anonymus Valesianus Ⅱ) (Institute of Classical Studies Bulletin Supplement 36) (London).Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1977a), The Vulgar Latin of the Letters of Claudius Terentianus (Manchester).Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1977b), ‘The vocabulary of the Annales regni Francorum’, Glotta 55, 257–82.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1977c), review of Önnerfors (1975), CR n.s. 27, 194–6.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1981), ‘Ausonius Cento nuptialis 101–131’, SIFC 53, 199–215.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1982a), ‘Anatomical terms transferred from animals to humans in Latin’, IF 87, 90–109.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1982b), The Latin Sexual Vocabulary (London).Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1983), ‘Words for “prostitute” in Latin’, RhM 126, 321–58.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1990a), ‘The Latinity of C. Novius Eunus’, ZPE 82, 227–47.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1990b), ‘The meaning and use of subiugale in veterinary Latin’, RFIC 118, 441–53.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1991), ‘Some neglected evidence for Latin habeo + infinitive: the order of the constituents’, TPhS 89, 131–96.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1992), ‘British Latin: notes on the language, text and interpretation of the Bath curse tablets’, Britannia 23, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1993), ‘The generic use of mula and the status and employment of female mules in the Roman world’, RhM 136, 35–61.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1994), ‘Latin and Punic in contact? The case of the Bu Njem ostraca’, JRS 84, 87–112.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1995a), ‘The Latin of the Vindolanda writing-tablets: an interim report’, JRS 85, 86–134.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1995b), Pelagonius and Latin Veterinary Terminology in the Roman Empire (Leiden).Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1996), ‘The interpretation of souxtum at Tab. Vindol. Ⅱ.301.3’, ZPE 110, 238.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1999), ‘The poets of Bu Njem: language, culture and the centurionate’, JRS 89, 109–34.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (2002), ‘An unusual epistolary formula and the text at RIB Ⅱ.4.2443.7’, ZPE 140, 262.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (2003a), Bilingualism and the Latin Language (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, J. N. (2003b), ‘The new Vindolanda writing-tablets’, CQ n.s. 53, 530–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, J. N. (2003c), ‘Romanitas and the Latin language’, CQ n.s. 53, 184–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, J. N. (2003d), ‘The word moritix in a new inscription from London’, ZPE 143, 275–6.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (2003e), ‘Petronius and new non-literary Latin’, in Herman and Rosén (2003), 11–23.

Adams, J. N. (2004), ‘A passage of Varro, De lingua Latina and an Oscan fragment of Atellan farce’, Mnemosyne 57, 352–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, J. N. (2005a), ‘The accusative + infinitive and dependent quod-/quia-clauses: the evidence of non-literary Latin and Petronius’, in Kiss, Mondin and Salvi (2005), 195–206.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (2005b), ‘The Bellum Africum’, in Reinhardt, Lapidge and Adams (2005), 73–96.

Adams, J. N. (2005c), ‘Neglected evidence for female speech in Latin’, CQ n.s. 55, 582–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, J. N. and Deegan, M. (1992), ‘Bald's Leechbook and the Physica Plinii’, Anglo-Saxon England 21, 87–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, J. N., Lapidge, M. and Reinhardt, T. (2005), ‘Introduction’, in Reinhardt, Lapidge and Adams (2005), 1–36.

Adams, J. N. and Mayer, R. (eds.) (1999), Aspects of the Language of Latin Poetry (Proceedings of the British Academy 93) (Oxford).Google Scholar

Lajara, Adiego I.-J. (1992), Protosabelio, Osco-Umbro, Sudpiceno (Barcelona).Google Scholar

Aebischer, P. (1948), ‘Granica “grange” et sa descendance dans les dialectes italiens et les langues de la péninsule ibérique’, Revista portuguesa de filologia 2, 201–19.Google Scholar

Alföldy, G. (1981), ‘Die älteste römische Inschrift der Iberischen Halbinsel’, ZPE 43, 1–12.Google Scholar

Allen, W. S. (1965), Vox Latina: A Guide to the Pronunciation of Classical Latin (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Alleyne, M. (1961), ‘Les noms des vents en gallo-roman’, Revue de linguistique romane 25, 75–136; 391–445.Google Scholar

Álvarez, Huerta O. (2003), ‘Sobre los hispanismos en el Itinerarium Egeriae’, in Solin, Leiwo and Halla-aho (2003), 83–97.

Amadasi, Guzzo M. G. (1967), Le iscrizioni fenicie e puniche delle colonie in occidente (Rome).Google Scholar

Amadasi, Guzzo M. G. (1986), ‘L'onomastica nelle iscrizioni puniche tripolitane’, Rivista di studi fenici 14, 21–51.Google Scholar

Amadasi, Guzzo M. G. (1990), Iscrizioni fenicie e puniche in Italia (Rome).Google Scholar

Amadasi Guzzo, M. G. (1995), ‘More on the Latin personal names ending with -us and -ius in Punic’, in Zevit, Z., Gitin, S. and Sokoloff, M. (eds.), Solving Riddles and Untying Knots: Biblical, Epigraphic, and Semitic Studies in Honor of Jonas C. Greenfield (Winona Lake, Indiana), 495–504.Google Scholar

André, J. (1949a), La vie et l’œuvre de C. Asinius Pollion (Paris).Google Scholar

André, J. (1949b), Étude sur les termes de couleur dans la langue latine (Paris).Google Scholar

André, J. (1954a), ‘Les noms latins de l'hellébore’, REL 32, 174–82.Google Scholar

André, J. (1954b), ‘Sur quelques noms de plantes’, RPh 28, 52–64.Google Scholar

André, J. (1956), Lexique des termes de botanique en latin (Paris).Google Scholar

André, J. (1958), Pline l'Ancien Histoire naturelle livre ⅩⅣ (Paris).Google Scholar

André, J. (1961), L'Alimentation et la cuisine à Rome (Paris).Google Scholar

André, J. (1964), Pline l'Ancien Histoire naturelle livre ⅩⅦ (Paris).Google Scholar

André, J. (1964–5), ‘Tossia “couverture de lit”’, Études celtiques 11, 409–12.Google Scholar

André, J. (1967), Les noms d'oiseaux en latin (Paris).Google Scholar

André, J. (1971), Pline l'Ancien Histoire naturelle livre ⅩⅩⅢ (Paris).Google Scholar

André, J. (1974), Pline l'Ancien Histoire naturelle livre ⅩⅩⅤ (Paris).Google Scholar

André, J. (1978), Les mots à redoublement en latin (Paris).Google Scholar

André, J. (1981), L'Alimentation et la cuisine à Rome, 2nd edn (Paris).Google Scholar

André, J. (1985a), Les noms de plantes dans la Rome antique (Paris).Google Scholar

André, J. (1985b), ‘Noms de plantes gaulois ou prétendus gaulois dans les textes grecs et latins’, Études celtiques 22, 179–98.Google Scholar

André, J. (1986), Isidore de Séville Étymologies livre Ⅻ (Paris).Google Scholar

André, J. (1987), ‘Étymologies et mots rares’, RPh 61, 185–92.Google Scholar

André, J. (1991), Le vocabulaire latin de l'anatomie (Paris).Google Scholar

Abellán, Arias C. (ed.) (2006), Latin vulgaire – latin tardif Ⅶ: Actes du ⅦèmeColloque international sur le latin vulgaire et tardif. Séville, 2–6 septembre 2003 (Seville).Google Scholar

Ariza Viguera, M. (2006), ‘El supuesto influjo suritálico’, in Arias Abellán (2006), 67–80.

Arnaldi, F., Turriani, M. and Smiraglia, P. (1939–64), Latinitatis Italicae medii aevi inde ab a. CDLXXVI usque ad a. MXXII lexicon imperfectum, 3 vols. (Turin).Google Scholar

Audollent, A. (1904), Defixionum tabellae (Paris).Google Scholar

Auer, P. and Hinskens, F. (2005), ‘The role of interpersonal accommodation in a theory of language change’, in Auer, Hinskens and Kerswill (2005), 335–57.CrossRef

Auer, P., Hinskens, F. and Kerswill, P. (eds.) (2005), Dialect Change: Convergence and Divergence in European Languages (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bachellery, É. and Lambert, P.-Y. (eds.) (1987), Lexique étymologique de l'Irlandais ancien de J. Vendryes (Paris).Google Scholar

Badian, E. (1967), review of E. Malcovati, Brutus and A. E. Douglas, Cicero Brutus, JRS 57, 223–30.Google Scholar

Baehrens, W. A. (1922), Sprachlicher Kommentar zur vulgärlateinischen Appendix Probi (Halle an der Saale).Google Scholar

Bakkum, G. C. L. M. (1994), ‘The second-declension nominative plural in -eis, -es, -is, and the first-declension nominative plural in -as’, in Herman, J. (ed.), Linguistic Studies on Latin: Selected Papers from the 6th International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics (Budapest, 23–27 March 1991) (Amsterdam and Philadelphia), 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldi, P. (1999), The Foundations of Latin (Berlin and New York).Google Scholar

Baldinger, K. (1972), La formación de los dominios lingüísticos en la Península Ibérica, 2nd edn of Spanish translation (Madrid); original publication Berlin, 1958.Google Scholar

Balsdon, J. P. V. D. (1979), Romans and Aliens (London).Google Scholar

Bambeck, M. (1959), Lateinisch-romanische Wortstudien Ⅰ (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar

Banniard, M. (1992), Viva voce: communication écrite et communication orale du IVe au IXe siècle en Occident latin (Paris).Google Scholar

Barbarino, J. L. (1978), The Evolution of the Latin /b/–/u/ Merger: A Quantitative and Comparative Analysis of the B–V Alternation in Latin Inscriptions (University of North Carolina Studies in the Romance Languages and Literatures 182) (Chapel Hill).Google Scholar

Barbier, P. (1920), ‘Les noms des poissons d'eau douce dans les textes latins’, Revue de philologie française et de littérature 32, 124–53.Google Scholar

Barker, G., Gilbertson, D., Jones, B. and Mattingly, D. (eds.) (1996), Farming the Desert: The UNESCO Libyan Valleys Archaeological Survey, 2 vols. (Paris, Tripoli and London).Google Scholar

Barley, M. W. and Hanson, R. P. C. (eds.) (1968), Christianity in Britain, 300–700 (Leicester).Google Scholar

Bartoccini, R. (1928), ‘Scavi e rinvenimenti in Tripolitania negli anni 1926–1927’, Africa italiana 2, 187–200.Google Scholar

Basso, W. and Durante, D. (2000), Nuovo dizionario veneto-italiano etimologico – italiano-veneto (Villanova del Ghebbo).Google Scholar

Bastardas, Parera J. (1953), Particularidades sint´cticas del latín medieval (Barcelona and Madrid).Google Scholar

Battisti, C. (1949), Avviamento allo studio del latino volgare (Bari).Google Scholar

Battisti, C. and Alessio, G. (1950–7), Dizionario etimologico italiano, 5 vols. (Florence).Google Scholar

Bean, S. C. (2000), The Coinage of the Atrebates and Regni (Oxford).Google Scholar

Bellanger, L. (1902), In Antonini Placentini Itinerarium grammatica disquisitio (Paris).Google Scholar

Bémont, C. and Jacob, J.-P. (eds.) (1986), La terre sigillée gallo-romaine. Lieux de production du Haut Empire: implantations, produits, relations (Paris).Google Scholar

Bendz, G. and Pape, I. (1990–3), Caelii Aureliani Celerum passionum libri Ⅲ, Tardarum passionum libriⅤ, 2 vols. (Berlin).Google Scholar

Benelli, E. (1994), Le iscrizioni bilingui etrusco-latine (Florence).Google Scholar

Berenguer-Sánchez, J. A. and Luján, E. R. (2004), ‘La nueva inscripción falisca de Cavios Frenaios’, ZPE 149, 213–22.Google Scholar

Berrato, G. (2005), ‘Dialect/standard convergence, mixing, and models of language contact: the case of Italy’, in Auer, Hinskens and Kerswill (2005), 81–95.

Bertoldi, V. (1931a), ‘Fenomeno basco-guascone attestato da Plinio?’, Archivum Romanicum 15, 400–10.Google Scholar

Bertoldi, V. (1931b), ‘Problèmes de substrat: essai de méthodologie dans le domaine préhistorique de la toponymie et du vocabulaire’, BSL 32, 93–184.Google Scholar

Bertoldi, V. (1937), ‘Contatti e conflitti di lingue nell'antico Mediterraneo’, Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 57, 137–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bertoldi, V. (1950), Colonizzazioni nell'antico Mediterraneo occidentale alla luce degli aspetti linguistici (Naples).Google Scholar

Bertoldi, V. (1951), ‘Metodi vecchi e nuovi nella ricerca etimologica’, Archivio glottologico italiano 36, 1–48.Google Scholar

Bertoldi, V. (1952), ‘Episodi dialettali nella storia del latino della Campania e dell'Iberia’, in Estudios dedicados a Menéndez Pidal Ⅲ (Madrid), 33–53.Google Scholar

Bieler, L. (1963), The Irish Penitentials (Dublin).Google Scholar

Bieler, L. (1979), The Patrician Texts in the Book of Armagh (Dublin).Google Scholar

Birley, A. R. (1988), The African Emperor Septimius Severus, 2nd edn (London).Google Scholar

Birley, A. R. (1997), Hadrian: The Restless Emperor (London and New York).Google Scholar

Bischoff, B. (1984), Anecdota novissima: Texte des vierten bis sechzehnten Jahrhunderts (Stuttgart).Google Scholar

Biville, F. (1989), ‘Les hellénismes dans les inscriptions latines païennes de la Gaule (1er – 4ème s. ap. J.-C.)’, in La langue des inscriptions de la Gaule: Actes de la Table-ronde tenue au C.E.R.G.R. les 6 et 7 octobre 1988 (Université Lyon Ⅲ) (Paris), 99–115.Google Scholar

Biville, F. (1990), Les emprunts du latin au grec: approche phonétique Ⅰ. Introduction et consonantisme (Louvain and Paris).Google Scholar

Biville, F. (1995), Les emprunts du latin au grec: approche phonétique Ⅱ. Vocalisme et conclusions (Louvain and Paris).Google Scholar

Blaise, A. (1975), Lexicon Latinitatis medii aevi (Turnholt).Google Scholar

Blanchet, A. (1949), ‘Jeux de mots et onomatopées sur des monnaies gauloises’, Études celtiques 5, 82–6.Google Scholar

Blänsdorf, J. (1997), ‘Atellana fabula’, in Der neue Pauly: Enzyklopädie der Antike (Stuttgart and Weimar) II, 151–3.Google Scholar

Blaylock, C. (1964–5), ‘The monophthongization of Latin AE in Spanish’, Romance Philology 18, 16–26.Google Scholar

Blaylock, C. (1965–6), ‘Assimilation of stops to preceding resonants in Ibero-Romance’, Romance Philology 19, 418–34.Google Scholar

Bloch, O. and Wartburg, W. (1968), Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue française, 5th edn (Paris).Google Scholar

Bloch, R. and Foti, G. (1953), ‘Nouvelles dédicaces archaïques à la déesse Féronia’, RPh 27, 65–77.Google Scholar

Blondheim, D. S. (1923), ‘Essai d'un vocabulaire comparatif des parlers romans des Juifs au moyen âge’, Romania 49, 1–47; 343–88.Google Scholar

Blümel, W. (1972), Untersuchungen zu Lautsystem und Morphologie des vorklassischen Lateins (Munich).Google Scholar

Bonfante, G. (1949), ‘Tracce del calendario ebràico in Sardegna?’, Word 5, 171–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonfante, G. (1967), ‘La lingua delle atellane e dei mimi’, in Frassinetti, P. (ed.), Atellanae fabulae (Rome), v–xxiv, = Maia 19 (1967), 3–21.Google Scholar

Bonfante, G. (1999), The Origin of the Romance Languages: Stages in the Development of Latin, edited by Bonfante, L. (Heidelberg).Google Scholar

Bonnet, M. (1890), Le latin de Grégoire de Tours (Paris).Google Scholar

Bourciez, É. (1946), Éléments de linguistique romane, 4th edn (Paris).Google Scholar

Bowman, A. K. and Thomas, J. D. (1994), The Vindolanda Writing-Tablets (Tabulae Vindolandenses Ⅱ) (London).Google Scholar

Bowman, A. K. and Thomas, J. D. (2003), The Vindolanda Writing-Tablets (Tabulae Vindolandenses Ⅲ) (London).Google Scholar

Bowman, A. K., Thomas, J. D. and Adams, J. N. (1990), ‘Two letters from Vindolanda’, Britannia 21, 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradley, G. (2000), Ancient Umbria: State, Culture, and Identity in Central Italy from the Iron Age to the Augustan Era (Oxford).Google Scholar

Braun, P. (1969), ‘Sur une locution du “latin d'Afrique”’, in Hommages à Marcel Renard Ⅰ (Collection Latomus 101) (Brussels), 133–9.Google Scholar

Breyer, G. (1993), Etruskisches Sprachgut im Lateinischen unter Ausschluss des spezifisch onomastischen Bereiches (Louvain).Google Scholar

Briscoe, J. (1998), Valeri Maximi Facta et dicta memorabilia, 2 vols. (Stuttgart and Leipzig).Google Scholar

Brix, J. (1901), Ausgewählte Komödien des T. Maccius Plautus IV. Miles Gloriosus, 3rd edn revised by M. Niemeyer (Leipzig).Google Scholar

Brix, J. (1907), Ausgewählte Komödien des T. Maccius Plautus Ⅰ. Trinummus, 5th edn revised by M. Niemeyer (Leipzig and Berlin).Google Scholar

Brock, M. D. (1911), Studies in Fronto and his Age (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Brown, P. R. L. (1967), Augustine of Hippo: A Biography (London).Google Scholar

Brown, V. (1970), ‘A Latin letter from Oxyrhynchus’, BICS 17, 136–43.Google Scholar

Brugnoli, G. (1985), ‘Donato, Tiberio Claudio’, in Enciclopedia Virgiliana Ⅱ (Rome), 127–9.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. (1971), Italian Manpower 225 B.C.–A.D. 14 (Oxford).Google Scholar

Bruppacher, H. P. (1948), Die Namen der Wochentage im Italienischen und Rätoromanischen (Bern).Google Scholar

Bücheler, F. (1882), ‘Altes Latein’, RhM 37, 516–30.Google Scholar

Buck, C. D. (1904), A Grammar of Oscan and Umbrian (Boston).Google Scholar

Buck, C. D. (1933), Comparative Grammar of Greek and Latin (Chicago).

Bulhart, V. (1942), ‘Textkritische Studien zum lateinischen Oribasius’, WS 60, 106–16.Google Scholar

Burgess, P. (1993), ‘Principes cum tyrannis: two studies on the Kaisergeschichte and its tradition’, CQ n.s. 43, 491–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bussemaker, U. C. and Daremberg, C. (1873), Œuvres d'Oribase Ⅴ (Paris).Google Scholar

Bussemaker, U. C. (1876), Œuvres d'Oribase Ⅵ (Paris).Google Scholar

Calboli, G. (ed.) (1990), Latin vulgaire – latin tardif Ⅱ: Actes du Ⅱème Colloque international sur le latin vulgaire et tardif (Bologne, 29 août–2 septembre 1988) (Tübingen).Google Scholar

Calboli, G. (1994), ‘Latino volgare e latino classico’, in Lo spazio letterario del medioevo Ⅰ.2. Il medioevo latino (Rome), 11–62.Google Scholar

Calboli, G. (2000), ‘La latinizzazione dell'Italia: alcune considerazioni’, in Herman and Marinetti (2000), 5–21.

Calboli, G. (2006), ‘Encore une fois sur les tablettes de Murécine’, in Arias Abellán (2006), 155–68.

Calboli, Montefusco L. (1979), Consulti Fortunatiani Ars rhetorica (Bologna).Google Scholar

Callebat, L. (ed.) (1995), Latin vulgaire – latin tardif Ⅳ: Actes du 4e Colloque international sur le latin vulgaire et tardif. Caen, 2–5 septembre 1994 (Hildesheim, Zürich and New York).Google Scholar

Camodeca, G. (1999), Tabulae pompeianae Sulpiciorum (TPSulp.): edizione critica dell'archivio puteolano dei Sulpicii, 2 vols. (Rome).Google Scholar

Campanile, E. (1961), ‘Elementi dialettali nella fonetica e nella morfologia del latino’, Studi e saggi linguistici 1, 1–21.Google Scholar

Campanile, E. (1968), ‘Studi sulla posizione dialettale del latino’, Studi e saggi linguistici 8, 16–130.Google Scholar

Campanile, E. (1969), ‘Valutazione del latino di Britannia’, Studi e saggi linguistici 9, 87–110.Google Scholar

Campanile, E. (1974), ‘Denominazione antica di un vento di nord-ovest proprio della Gallia Narbonense in greco, latino e gallico’, Ricerche linguistici 6, 237–45.Google Scholar

Campanile, E. (1993), ‘Il latino dialettale’, in Campanile, E. (ed.), Caratteri e diffusione del latino in etá arcaica (Pisa), 13–23.Google Scholar

Caplan, H. (1954), [Cicero] Ad C. Herennium De ratione dicendi (Rhetorica ad Herennium) (Cambridge, Mass.).Google Scholar

Capponi, F. (1979), Ornithologia Latina (Genoa).Google Scholar

Carlton, C. M. (1965), Studies in Romance Lexicology, Based on a Collection of Late Latin Documents from Ravenna (AD 445–700) (University of North Carolina Studies in the Romance Languages and Literatures 54) (Chapel Hill).Google Scholar

Carnoy, A. J. (1906), Le latin d'Espagne d'après les inscriptions: étude linguistique, 2nd edn (Brussels).Google Scholar

Cassio, A. C. (1986), ‘Continuità e riprese arcaizzanti nell'uso epigrafico dei dialetti greci: il caso dell'eolico d'Asia’, AIΩN 8, 131–46.

Catalano, V. (1969), ‘Petronio e il dialetto napolitano’, GIF 21, 87–107.Google Scholar

Cavalca, M. G. (2001), I grecismi nel Satyricon di Petronio (Bologna).Google Scholar

Cavallo, G. (1992), ‘La cultura scritta a Ravenna tra antichità e alto medioevo’, in A. Carile (ed.), Storia di Ravenna Ⅱ.2. Dall'età bizantina all'età ottoniana (Venice), 79–125.Google Scholar

Cavazza, F. (1995), ‘Gli aggettivi in -ǐ-tǐmus ed il rapporto fra aedituus ed aeditumus’, Latomus 54, 577–91; 784–92.Google Scholar

Cèbe, J.-P. (1994), Varron Satires Ménippées Ⅹ (Rome).Google Scholar

Ceccaldi, M. (1968), Dictionnaire Corse-Français (Paris).Google Scholar

Cennamo, M. (2005), ‘Passive auxiliaries in late Latin’, in Kiss, Mondin and Salvi (2005), 177–94.CrossRef

Chambers, J. K. and Trudgill, P. (1980), Dialectology (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Champlin, E. (1980), Fronto and Antonine Rome (Cambridge, Mass. and London).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Champlin, E. (1987), ‘The testament of the piglet’, Phoenix 41, 174–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chantraine, P. (1999), Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque: histoire des mots, 2nd edn, with a supplement (Paris).Google Scholar

Charles-Edwards, T. (1995), ‘Language and society among the Insular Celts, AD 400–1000’, in Green, M. J. (ed.), The Celtic World (London), 703–36.Google Scholar

Charpin, F. (1979), Lucilius Satires Ⅱ. Livres Ⅸ–ⅩⅩⅧ (Paris).Google Scholar

Cheesman, C. E. A. (1998), ‘Tincomarus Commi filius’, Britannia 29, 309–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christenson, D. (2000), Plautus Amphitruo (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Cioranescu, A. (1966), Diccionario etimológico rumano (Madrid).Google Scholar

Clausen, W. (1994), A Commentary on Virgil Eclogues (Oxford).Google Scholar

Clerici, E. (1970), ‘Note sulla lingua di Venanzio Fortunato’, RIL 104, 219–51.Google Scholar

Coleman, K. (1988), Statius Silvae Ⅳ (Oxford).Google Scholar

Coleman, R. G. G. (1971), ‘The monophthongization of /ae/ and the Vulgar Latin vowel system’, TPhS [no volume number] 175–91.Google Scholar

Coleman, R. G. G. (1986), ‘The central Italic languages in the period of Roman expansion’, TPhS [no volume number] 100–31.Google Scholar

Coleman, R. G. G. (1990), ‘Dialectal variation in Republican Latin, with special reference to Praenestine’, PCPhS n.s. 36, 1–25.Google Scholar

Coleman, R. G. G. (1999), ‘Poetic diction, poetic discourse and the poetic register’, in Adams and Mayer (1999), 21–93.

Coleman, R. G. G. (2000), ‘The contribution to Vulgar Latin in Italy from other languages in the peninsula; some case studies’, in Herman and Marinetti (2000), 23–39.CrossRef

Colin, G. S. (1926), ‘Étymologies maġribines’, Hespéris 6, 55–82.Google Scholar

Collart, J. (1954a), Varron De lingua latina livre Ⅴ (Paris).Google Scholar

Collart, J. (1954b), Varron grammarien latin (Paris).Google Scholar

Collinge, N. E. (1985), The Laws of Indo-European (Amsterdam and Philadelphia).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colson, F. H. (1924), M. Fabii Quintiliani Institutionis oratoriae liber I (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Conant, J. P. (2004), ‘Literacy and private documentation in Vandal North Africa: the case of the Albertini Tablets’, in Merrills (2004), 199–224.

Contini, A. M. V. (1987), ‘Nonio Marcello e l’Africitas’, Studi noniani 12 (Genoa), 17–26.Google Scholar

Cooley, A. E. (ed.) (2002), Becoming Roman, Writing Latin? Literacy and Epigraphy in the Roman West (JRA Supplementary Series 48) (Portsmouth, Rhode Island).Google Scholar

Corbett, P. B. (1958), The Latin of the Regula Magistri (Louvain).Google Scholar

Corcoran, S., Salway, B. and Salway, P. (2002), ‘Moritix Londiniensium: a recent epigraphic find in London’, British Epigraphy Society Newsletter n.s. 8, 10–12.Google Scholar

Corell, J. (1993), ‘Defixionis tabella aus Carmona (Sevilla)’, ZPE 95, 261–8.Google Scholar

Cornell, T. J. (1995), The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000–264 BC) (London and New York).Google Scholar

Corominas, J. (1956), ‘New information on Hispano-Celtic from the Spanish Etymological Dictionary’, Zeitschrift für celtische Philologie 25, 30–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corominas, J. (1967), Breve diccionario etimológico de la lengua castellana, 2nd edn (Madrid).Google Scholar

Corominas, J. and Pascual, J. A. (1980–91), Diccionario crítico etimológico castellana e hispánica, 6 vols. (Madrid).Google Scholar

Coromines, J. (1980–2001), Diccionari etimològic i complementari de la llengua catalana, 10 vols. (Barcelona).Google Scholar

Corsetti, P.-P. (1982), ‘Notes de lexicologie latine’, RPh 56, 233–48.Google Scholar

Cortelazzo, M. and Zolli, P. (1999), DELI – Dizionario etimologico della lingua Italiana, 2nd edn (Bologna).Google Scholar

Courcelle, P. (1969), Late Latin Writers and their Greek Sources (Cambridge, Mass.). Translation of Les lettres grecques en occident de Macrobe à Cassiodore, 2nd edn (Paris, 1948).Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (1980), A Commentary on the Satires of Juvenal (London).Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (1993), The Fragmentary Latin Poets (Oxford).Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (1995), Musa Lapidaria: A Selection of Latin Verse Inscriptions (Atlanta).Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (1999), Archaic Latin Prose (Atlanta).Google Scholar

Courtois, C., Leschi, L., Perrat, C. and Saumagne, C. (1952), Tablettes Albertini: Actes privés de l’époque vandale (Fin du Ve siècle) (Paris).Google Scholar

Cousin, J. (1975), Quintilien Institution oratoire Ⅰ. Livre Ⅰ (Paris).Google Scholar

Cózar, J. M. (2005), Mulomedicina Chironis: estudio filológico. Estudio crítico y edición del libro segundo de la Mulomedicina Chironis (Barcelona, doctoral dissertation).Google Scholar

Crawford, M. H. (ed.) (1996), Roman Statutes (Institute of Classical Studies Bulletin Supplement 64), 2 vols. (London).Google Scholar

Crawford, M. H. and Reynolds, J. M. (1979), ‘The Aezani copy of the Prices Edict’, ZPE 34, 163–210.Google Scholar

Creighton, J. (2000), Coins and Power in Late Iron Age Britain (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cristofani, M. (1993), ‘Nuove iscrizioni “paleoosche”’, in Meiser, G. (ed.), Indogermanica et Italica: Festschrift für Helmut Rix zum 65. Geburtstag (Innsbruck), 69–75.Google Scholar

Cuntz, O. (ed.) (1929), Itineraria Romana I. Itineraria Antonini Augusti et Burdigalense (Leipzig).Google Scholar

Daintree, D. and Geymonat, M. (1988), ‘Scholia non Serviana’, in Enciclopedia virgiliana Ⅳ (Rome), 706–20.Google Scholar

Dalton, O. M. (1915), The Letters of Sidonius, 2 vols. (Oxford).Google Scholar

D'Ascoli, F. (1993), Nuovo vocabolario dialettale napoletano (Naples).Google Scholar

Daube, D. (1969), Roman Law: Linguistic, Social and Philosophical Aspects (Edinburgh).Google Scholar

David, J.-M. (1983), ‘Les orateurs des municipes à Rome: intégration, réticences et snobismes’, in Les ‘bourgeoisies’ municipales italiennes aux Ⅱe et Ier siècles av. J.-C. (Colloques internationaux du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 609. Centre Jean Bérard, Institut Français de Naples, 7–10 décembre 1981) (Paris and Naples), 309–23.

A. Davies Morpurgo (1987), ‘The Greek notion of dialect’, Verbum 10, 7–27 = Harrison, T. (ed.), Greeks and Barbarians (Edinburgh, 2002), 153–71.Google Scholar

A. Davies Morpurgo (1993), ‘Geography, history and dialect: the case of Oropus’, in Crespo, E., García Ramón, J. L. and Striano, A. (eds.), Dialectologica graeca: Actas del Ⅱ Coloquio internacional de dialectología griega (Miraflores de la Sierra, Madrid, 19–21 de junio de 1991) (Madrid), 261–79.Google Scholar

Delamarre, X. (2003), Dictionnaire de la langue gauloise: une approche linguistique du vieux-celtique continental, 2nd edn (Paris).Google Scholar

Vega, del Barrio M. F. (1986–7), ‘Sobre los arcaísmos de Aulo Gelio’, CFC 20, 63–71.Google Scholar

Palma, Del Tutto L. (1997), ‘L'iscrizione di Caso Cantovio’, SE 63, 477–87.Google Scholar

Delz, J. (1952), review of E. Löfstedt (1950), Gnomon 24, 281–2.Google Scholar

Deman, A. (1981), ‘Le terme de parenté germanique suecerio / socerio dans les inscriptions latines’, AC 50, 198–208.Google Scholar

de Melo, W. (2002), ‘The sigmatic future in Plautus’, in Bolkestein, A. M., Kroon, C. H. M., Pinkster, H., Remmelink, H. W. and Risselada, R. (eds.), Theory and Description in Latin Linguistics: Selected Papers from the Ⅺth International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, Amsterdam, June 24–29, 2001 (Amsterdam), 75–90.Google Scholar

Meo, De C. (1983), Lingue tecniche del latino (Bologna).Google Scholar

Dench, E. (1995), From Barbarians to New Men: Greek, Roman, and Modern Perceptions of Peoples from the Central Apennines (Oxford).Google Scholar

Saint-Denis, De E. (1939), ‘Évolution sémantique de “urbanus-urbanitas”’, Latomus 3, 5–24.Google Scholar

Saint-Denis, De E. (1947), Le vocabulaire des animaux marins en latin classique (Paris).Google Scholar

Saint-Denis, De E. (1969), Columelle De l'agriculture livre Ⅹ (Paris).Google Scholar

Desanges, J. (1980), Pline l'Ancien Histoire naturelle livre Ⅴ, 1–46 (Paris).Google Scholar

De, Simone C. (1970), Die griechischen Entlehnungen im Etruskischen Ⅱ. Untersuchung (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar

Deutschmann, O. (1947–8), ‘Französisch aveugle: ein Beitrag zur Methodik und Problematik etymologischer Forschung’, Romanistisches Jahrbuch 1, 87–153.Google Scholar

Devine, A. M. (1970), The Latin Thematic Genitive Singular (Stanford).Google Scholar

Díaz y Díaz, M. C. (1960), ‘El latín de la Península Ibérica 3. Dialectalismos’, in Alvar, M. et al. (eds.), Enciclopedia lingüística hispánica I (Madrid), 237–50.Google Scholar

Dickey, E. (2002), Latin Forms of Address from Plautus to Apuleius (Oxford).Google Scholar

Diehl, E. (1899), De m finali epigraphica (Leipzig).Google Scholar

Diller, A. (1975), ‘Agathemerus, Sketch of Geography’, GRBS 16, 59–76.Google Scholar

Dionisotti, A. C. (1982), ‘From Ausonius’ schooldays? A schoolbook and its relatives’, JRS 72, 83–125.Google Scholar

Dobson, B. and Mann, J. C. (1973), ‘The Roman army and Britons in the Roman army’, Britannia 4, 191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Domergue, C. (1972–74), ‘À propos de Pline, Naturalis historia, 33, 70–78, et pour illustrer sa description des mines d'or romaines d'Espagne’, AEA45–7, 499–548.Google Scholar

Domergue, C. (1983), La mine antique d'Aljustrel (Portugal) et les tables de bronze de Vipasca (Paris). Extract from Conimbriga 22 (1983), 5–193.Google Scholar

Domergue, C. (1990), Les mines de la Péninsule Ibérique dans l'antiquité romaine (Rome).Google Scholar

Donner, H. and Röllig, W. (1966–69), Kanaanäische und aramäische Inschriften, mit einem Beitrag von O. Rössler, 2nd edn, 3 vols. (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar

Donner, H. (2002), Kanaanäische und aramäische Inschriften I, 5th edn (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar

Douglas, A. E. (1966), M. Tulli Ciceronis Brutus (Oxford).Google Scholar

Duchesne, L. (ed.) (1955–7), Le Liber pontificalis: texte, introduction et commentaire, 3 vols. (Paris).Google Scholar

Durante, M. (1978), ‘I dialetti medio-italici’, in Prosdocimi, A. L. (ed.), Lingue e dialetti dell'Italia antica (Rome), 789–823.Google Scholar

Dyck, A. R. (1996), A Commentary on Cicero, De officiis (Ann Arbor).Google Scholar

Edmondson, J. (2002), ‘Writing Latin in the Roman province of Lusitania’, in Cooley (2002), 41–60.

Eigler, U. (2001), ‘Polemius Silvius’, in Der neue Pauly: Enzyklopädie der Antike (Stuttgart and Weimar) X, 5–6.Google Scholar

Eitrem, S. (1932), ‘Zum lateinischen Oribasius’, in Symbolae philologicae O. A. Danielsson octogenario dicatae (Uppsala), 72–7.Google Scholar

Elcock, W. D. (1960), The Romance Languages (London).Google Scholar

Elmayer, A. F. (1985), ‘The centenaria of Roman Tripolitania’, Libyan Studies 16, 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elmes, S. (2005), Talking for Britain: A Journey through the Nation's Dialects (London).Google Scholar

Ernout, A. (1905–06), ‘Le parler de Préneste d'après les inscriptions’, MSL 13, 293–349.Google Scholar

Ernout, A. (1908–9), ‘Recherches sur l'emploi du passif latin à l’époque républicaine’, MSL 15, 273–333.Google Scholar

Ernout, A. (1909a), Les éléments dialectaux du vocabulaire latin (Paris).Google Scholar

Ernout, A. (1909b), ‘De l'emploi du passif dans la Mulomedicina Chironis’, in Mélanges offerts à Louis Havet (Paris), 131–50.Google Scholar

Ernout, A. and Meillet, A. (1959), Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine, 4th edn (Paris).Google Scholar

Eska, J. F. (1987), ‘The language of the Latin inscriptions of Pompeii and the question of an Oscan substratum’, Glotta 65, 146–61.Google Scholar

Euzennat, M., Marion, J. and Gascou, J. (1982), Inscriptions antiques du Maroc Ⅱ. Inscriptions latines (Paris).Google Scholar

Evans, D. Ellis (1967), Gaulish Personal Names: A Study of Some Continental Celtic Formations (Oxford).Google Scholar

Evans, D. Ellis (1983), ‘Language contact in pre-Roman and Roman Britain’, ANRW II.29.2, 949–87.Google Scholar

Fahnestock, E. and Peaks, M. B. (1913), ‘A Vulgar Latin origin for Spanish padres meaning “father and mother”’, TAPA 44, 77–86.Google Scholar

Fernández Martínez, C. (1998–9), Poesía epigráfica latina, 2 vols. (Madrid).Google Scholar

Fischer, D. H. (1989), Albion's Seed: Four British Folkways in America (New York and Oxford).Google Scholar

Fischer, K.-D. (1987), ‘Nochmals ubuppa und tit(t)ina’, Philologus 131 (1987), 156–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischer, K.-D. (1994), ‘Der Liber medicinalis des Pseudo-Democritus’, in Vázquez Buján, M. E. (ed.), Tradición e innovación de la medicina latina de la antigüedad y de la alta edad media: Actas del Ⅳ Coloquio internacional sobre los ‘textos médicos latinos antiguos’ (Santiago de Compostela), 45–56.Google Scholar

Fischer, K.-D. (2000), Bibliographie des textes médicaux latins: antiquité et haut moyen âge. Premier supplément 1986–1999 (Saint-Étienne).Google Scholar

Fischer, K.-D. (2003a), ‘Galeni qui fertur Ad Glauconem Liber tertius ad fidem codicis Vindocinensis 109’, in Garofalo and Roselli (2003), 283–346.

Fischer, K.-D. (2003b), ‘Der pseudogalenische Liber tertius’, in Garofalo and Roselli (2003), 101–32.

Fischer, Drew K. (1949), The Burgundian Code (Philadelphia).Google Scholar

Fleuriot, L. (1991), ‘Celtoromanica in the light of the newly discovered Celtic inscriptions’, Zeitschrift für celtische Philologie 44, 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleury, P. (1990), Vitruve De l'architecture livre Ⅰ (Paris).Google Scholar

Flobert, P. (1981), ‘La Patavinitas de Tite-Live d'après les mœurs littéraires du temps’, REL 59, 193–206.Google Scholar

Flobert, P. (1985), Varron La langue latine livre Ⅵ (Paris).Google Scholar

Flobert, P. (1988), ‘Lingua latina et lingua romana: purisme, administration et invasions barbares’, Ktèma 13, 205–12.Google Scholar

Flobert, P. (1992), ‘Les graffites de La Graufesenque: un témoignage sur le gallo-latin sous Néron’, in Iliescu, M. and Marxgut, W. (eds.), Latin vulgaire – latin tardif Ⅲ: Actes du Ⅲème Colloque international sur le latin vulgaire et tardif (Innsbruck, 2–5 septembre 1991) (Tübingen), 103–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flobert, P. (1995), ‘Le latin des tablettes de Murécine (Pompéi)’, REL 73 (1995), 138–50.Google Scholar

Flobert, P. (1999), ‘Le latin à la cour de Clovis selon Anthime’, in Petersmann and Kettemann (1999), 19–29.

Fogolari, G. and Prosdocimi, A. L. (1988), I Veneti antichi: lingua e cultura (Padua).Google Scholar

Fontaine, J. (1959), Isidore de Séville et la culture classique dans l'Espagne wisigothique I (Paris).Google Scholar

Forbes, R. J. (1966), Studies in Ancient Technology V, 2nd edn (Leiden).Google Scholar

Fordyce, C. J. (1961), Catullus, a Commentary (Oxford).Google Scholar

Fraenkel, E. (1932), ‘Senatus consultum de Bacchanalibus’, Hermes 67, 369–96 = Fraenkel (1964) Ⅱ, 447–75.Google Scholar

Fraenkel, E. (1960), Elementi plautini in Plauto (Florence).Google Scholar

Fraenkel, E. (1961), ‘Two poems of Catullus’, JRS 51, 46–53 = Fraenkel (1964) Ⅱ, 115–29.Google Scholar

Fraenkel, E. (1964), Kleine Beiträge zur Klassischen Philologie, 2 vols. (Rome).Google Scholar

Fraenkel, E. (1968), ‘Zur römischen Komödie’, MH 25, 231–42.Google Scholar

Fraisse, A. (2002), Cassius Felix De la médecine (Paris).Google Scholar

Frank, B. (2002), review of Bonfante (1999), Kratylos 47, 190–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frank, K.-S. (2001), ‘Regula Magistri’, in Der neue Pauly: Enzyklopädie der Antike (Stuttgart and Weimar) X, 838–43.Google Scholar

Fraser, P. M. and Matthews, E. (1997), A Lexicon of Greek Personal Names ⅢA (Oxford).Google Scholar

Freeman, P. (2002), ‘Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum (Berlin, 1862–). I2 365 and Faliscan language survival’, ZPE 140, 252.Google Scholar

Friedländer, L. (1886), M. Valerii Martialis epigrammaton libri, 2 vols. (Leipzig).Google Scholar

Friedrich, J. (1947), ‘Griechisches und Römisches in phönizischem und punischem Gewande’, in Fück, J. (ed.), Festschrift Otto Eissfeldt zum 60. Geburtstage 1. September 1947 (Halle an der Saale), 109–24.Google Scholar

Friedrich, J. (1953), ‘Vulgärpunisch und Vulgärlatein in den neupunischen Inschriften’, Cahiers de Byrsa 3, 99–111.Google Scholar

Frings, T. (1959), ‘Lex salica sunnia, Französisch soin’, Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 81, 416–27.Google Scholar

Funaioli, H. (1907), Grammaticae Romanae fragmenta I (Leipzig).Google Scholar

Funck, A. (1893), ‘Glossographische Studien’, ALL 8, 369–96.Google Scholar

Gaeng, P. A. (1968), An Inquiry into Local Variations in Vulgar Latin, as Reflected in the Vocalism of Christian Inscriptions (University of North Carolina Studies in the Romance Languages and Literatures 77) (Chapel Hill).Google Scholar

Gaeng, P. A. (1969), ‘The extent of Germanic influences on the vocabulary of the so-called Fredegarius Chronicles’, Romance Notes 11, 1–6.Google Scholar

Gaeng, P. A. (1977), A Study of Nominal Inflections in Latin Inscriptions: A Morpho-Syntactic Analysis (University of North Carolina Studies in the Romance Languages and Literatures 182) (Chapel Hill).Google Scholar

Gaeng, P. A. (1984), Collapse and Reorganization of the Latin Nominal Flection as Reflected in Epigraphic Sources (Potomac).Google Scholar

Galdi, G. (2000), ‘Reflexive and possessive pronouns in Greek and Latin inscriptions of the Empire (Moesia Inferior)’, in Calboli, G. (ed.), Papers on Grammar V (Bologna), 73–94.Google Scholar

Galdi, G. (2004), Grammatica delle iscrizioni latine dell'impero (province orientali): morfosintassi nominale (Rome).Google Scholar

Gamillscheg, E. (1934–6), Romania Germanica: Sprach- und Siedlungsgeschichte der Germanen auf dem Boden des alten Römerreiches, 3 vols. (Berlin and Leipzig).

Gamillscheg, E. (1947), review of Svennung (1941) and Norberg (1943), Romanische Forschungen 60, 787–803.Google Scholar

Gamillscheg, E. (1970), Romania Germanica: Sprach- und Siedlungsgeschichte der Germanen auf dem Boden des alten Römerreiches I. Zu den ältesten Berührungen zwischen Römern und Germanen; die Franken, 2nd edn (Berlin).Google Scholar

Garbini, G. (1986), ‘Venti anni di epigrafia punica nel Magreb (1965–1985)’, Rivista di studi fenici 14, Supplemento.Google Scholar

Garofalo, I. and Roselli, A. (eds.) (2003), Galenismo e medicina tardoantica, fonti greche, latine e arabe: Atti del Seminario internazionale di Siena, Certosa di Pontignano, 9 e 10 settembre 2002 (Naples).Google Scholar

Geeson, C. (1969), A Northumberland and Durham Word Book (Newcastle upon Tyne).Google Scholar

Geiger, J. and Rosén, H. (2003), ‘Osca bybliotheca?’, in Herman and Rosén (2003), 123–5.

Geiriadur Prifysgol Cymru. A Dictionary of the Welsh Language (Cardiff, 1950–).

Gerber, A. and Greef, A. (1903), Lexicon Taciteum (Leipzig).Google Scholar

Gernand, K. (1928), Die Bezeichnungen des Sarges im Galloromanischen (Gieβener Beiträge zur Romanischen Philologie 21) (Gieβen).Google Scholar

Gerola, B. (1950), ‘Il nominativo plurale in -ās nel latino e il plurale romanzo’, Symbolae philologicae Gotoburgenses (Acta Universitatis Gotoburgensis LVI: 3) (Göteborg), 327–54.Google Scholar

Geyer, P. (1885), ‘Beiträge zur Kenntnis des gallischen Lateins’, ALL 2, 25–47.Google Scholar

Geyer, P. (1893), ‘Spuren gallischen Lateins bei Marcellus Empiricus’, ALL 8, 469–81.Google Scholar

Giacomelli, G. (1963), La lingua falisca (Florence).Google Scholar

Giacomelli, R. (1978), Problemi di storia linguistica del latino dialettale I. Ricerche falische (Florence).Google Scholar

Giammarco, E. (1968–79), Dizionario abruzzese e molisano, 4 vols. (Rome).Google Scholar

Gignac, F. T. (1976), A Grammar of the Greek Papyri of the Roman and Byzantine Periods I. Phonology (Milan).Google Scholar

Gignac, F. T. (1981), A Grammar of the Greek Papyri of the Roman and Byzantine Periods Ⅱ. Morphology (Milan).Google Scholar

Godefroy, F. (1888), Dictionnaire de l'ancienne langue française V (Paris).Google Scholar

Goetz, G. (1912), M. Terenti Varronis Rerum rusticarum libri tres (Leipzig).Google Scholar

Goetz, G. and Schoell, F. (1910), M. Terenti Varronis De lingua Latina quae supersunt (Leipzig 1910).Google Scholar

Goldberger, W. (1930), ‘Kraftausdrücke im Vulgärlatein’, Glotta 18, 8–65.Google Scholar

Gonis, N. (2005), ‘Consular epithets and regionalism in sixth-century Egypt’, ZPE 152, 183–6.Google Scholar

Goodchild, R. G. and Ward-Perkins, J. B. (1949), ‘The Limes Tripolitanus in the light of recent discoveries’, JRS 39, 81–95.Google Scholar

Gourevitch, D. (1991), ‘Biberons romains: formes et noms’, in Sabbah, G. (ed.), Le latin médical: la constitution d'un langage scientifique (Saint-Étienne), 117–33.Google Scholar

Grandgent, C. H. (1907), An Introduction to Vulgar Latin (Boston).

Gratwick, A. S. (1982), ‘Latinitas Britannica: was British Latin archaic?’, in Brooks, N. (ed.), Latin and the Vernacular Languages in Early Medieval Britain (Leicester), 1–79.Google Scholar

Gratwick, A. S. (1993), Plautus Menaechmi (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Gray, J. H. (1897), T. Macci Plauti Trinummus (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Green, R. P. H. (1991), The Works of Ausonius (Oxford).Google Scholar

Green, W. M. (1951), ‘Augustine's use of Punic’, University of California Studies in Semitic Philology 11, 179–90.Google Scholar

Greene, D. (1968), ‘Some linguistic evidence relating to the British Church’, in Barley and Hanson (1968), 75–86.

Gregori, G. L. and Mattei, M. (eds.) (1999), Supplementa Italica – Imagines: Roma (Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum (Berlin, 1862–)., Ⅵ) Ⅰ. Musei Capitolini (Rome).Google Scholar

Grevander, S. (1926), Untersuchungen zur Sprache der Mulomedicina Chironis (Lund).Google Scholar

Griffiths, J. Gwyn (1975), Apuleius of Madauros: The Isis-Book (Metamorphoses, Book Ⅺ) (Leiden).Google Scholar

Gröber, G. (1884), ‘Vulgärlateinische Substrate romanischer Wörter’, ALL 1, 204–54; 539–57.Google Scholar

Gsell, S. (1901), Les monuments antiques de l'Algérie, 2 vols. (Paris).Google Scholar

Guéraud, O. (1942), ‘Ostraca grecs et latins de l'Wâdi Fawâkhir’, BIFAO 41, 141–96.Google Scholar

Hagen, H. (1867), Scholia Bernensia ad Vergili Bucolica atque Georgica (Leipzig).Google Scholar

Hall, R. A. (1974), External History of the Romance Languages (New York).Google Scholar

Hamp, C. (1888), ‘Die zusammengesetzen Präpositionen im Lateinischen’, ALL 5, 321–68.Google Scholar

Hamp, E. P. (1972), ‘diod, “a drink”’, Bulletin of the Board of Celtic Studies 24, 481–2.Google Scholar

Hamp, E. P. (1975), ‘Social gradience in British spoken Latin’, Britannia 6, 150–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanson, W. S. and Conolly, R. (2002), ‘Language and literacy in Roman Britain: some archaeological considerations’, in Cooley (2002), 151–64.

Harris, M. (1988), ‘The Romance languages’, in Harris and Vincent (1988), 1–25.

Harris, M. and Vincent, N. (eds.) (1988), The Romance Languages (London).Google Scholar

Harris, W. V. (1989) Ancient Literacy (Cambridge, Mass.).Google Scholar

Harrison, S. J. (2000), Apuleius, a Latin Sophist (Oxford).Google Scholar

Hassall, M. W. C. and Tomlin, R. S. O. (1982), ‘Inscriptions’, Britannia 13, 396–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hassall, M. W. C. (1987), ‘Inscriptions’, Britannia 18, 360–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hassall, M. W. C. (1989), ‘Inscriptions’, Britannia 20, 327–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hassall, M. W. C. (1992), ‘Inscriptions’, Britannia 23, 309–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hassall, M. W. C. (1993), ‘Inscriptions’, Britannia 24, 310–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hassall, M. W. C. (1994), ‘Inscriptions’, Britannia 25, 293–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hassall, M. W. C. (1995), ‘Inscriptions’, Britannia 26, 371–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hassall, M. W. C. (1996), ‘Inscriptions’, Britannia 27, 439–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hays, G. (2004), ‘“Romuleis Libicisque litteris”: Fulgentius and the “Vandal Renaissance”’, in Merrills (2004), 101–32.

Healy, J. F. (1999), Pliny the Elder on Science and Technology (Oxford).Google Scholar

Hedfors, H. (1932), Compositiones ad tingenda musiva (Uppsala).Google Scholar

Hehl, A. (1912), Die Formen der lateinischen ersten Deklination in den Inschriften (Tübingen).Google Scholar

Heraeus, W. (1899), ‘Zur Kritik und Erklärung der Serviusscholien’, Hermes 34, 161–73.Google Scholar

Heraeus, W. (1902), ‘Die römische Soldatensprache’, ALL 12, 255–80.Google Scholar

Heraeus, W. (1904), ‘Sprachliches aus Märtyrerakten’, ALL 13, 429–32.Google Scholar

Heraeus, W. (1937), Kleine Schriften von Wilhelm Heraeus, edited by Hofmann, J. B. (Heidelberg).Google Scholar

Herman, J. (1957), ‘Cur, quare, quomodo: remarques sur l’évolution des particules d'interrogation en latin vulgaire’, Acta antiqua Academiae scientiarum Hungaricae 5, 369–77, = Herman (1990), 289–97.Google Scholar

Herman, J. (1961), ‘Posit (= posuit) et questions connexes dans les inscriptions pannoniennes: essai de géographie linguistique’, Acta antiqua Academiae scientiarum Hungaricae 9, 321–31 = Herman (1990),94–104.Google Scholar

Herman, J. (1963), La formation du système roman des conjonctions de subordination (Berlin).Google Scholar

Herman, J. (1965a), ‘Le datif possessif dans la latinité balkanique’, Omagiu lui Alexandru Rosetti (Bucarest), 375–8 = Herman (1990), 315–20.Google Scholar

Herman, J. (1965b), ‘Aspects de la différenciation territoriale du latin sous l'Empire’, BSL 60, 53–70 = Herman (1990), 10–28.Google Scholar

Herman, J. (1968), ‘Latinitas Pannonica: vue d'ensemble des caractéristiques de la latinité pannonienne: un essai’, Filológiai Közlöny 14, 364–76 = Herman (1990), 105–20 (the original Hungarian version translated by the author).Google Scholar

Herman, J. (1971), ‘Essai sur la latinité du littoral adriatique à l’époque de l'Empire’, in Sprache und Geschichte: Festschrift Harri Meier (Munich), 199–226 = Herman (1990), 121–46.Google Scholar

Herman, J. (1978), ‘Du latin épigraphique au latin provincial: essai de sociologie linguistique sur la langue des inscriptions’, in Travaux de linguistique et de grammaire comparée offerts à Michel Lejeune (Paris), 99–114 = Herman (1990), 35–49.Google Scholar

Herman, J. (1982), ‘Un vieux dossier réouvert: les transformations du système latin des quantités vocaliques’, BSL 77, 285–302 = Herman (1990), 217–31.Google Scholar

Herman, J. (1983), ‘La langue latine dans la Gaule romaine’, ANRW II.29.2, 1045–60 = Herman (1990), 147–63.Google Scholar

Herman, J. (1984), ‘L’Évolution du latin dans les provinces de l'Empire: problèmes et perspectives’, in Actes du Ⅶe Congrès de la Fédération internationale des associations d’études classiques II (Budapest), 305–10 = Herman (1990), 55–61.Google Scholar

Herman, J. (1985a), ‘La différenciation territoriale du latin et la formation des langues romanes’, in Actes du ⅩⅦe Congrès international de linguistique et philologie romanes II (Aix-en-Provence), 15–62 = Herman (1990), 62–92.Google Scholar

Herman, J. (1985b), ‘Témoignage des inscriptions latines et préhistoire des langues romanes: le cas de la Sardaigne’, in M. Deanoviy (ed.), Mélanges de linguistique dédiés á la mémoire de Petar Skok (1881–1956) (Zagreb), 207–16 = Herman (1990), 183–94.

Herman, J. (ed.) (1987), Latin vulgaire – latin tardif: Actes du Ier Colloque international sur le latin vulgaire et tardif (Pécs, 2–5 septembre 1985) (Tübingen).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herman, J. (1990), Du latin aux langues romanes: études de linguistique historique (Tübingen).Google Scholar

Herman, J. (1991), ‘Spoken and written Latin in the last centuries of the Roman Empire: a contribution to the linguistic history of the western provinces’, in Wright, R. (ed.), Latin and the Romance Languages in the Early Middle Ages (London and New York), 29–43.Google Scholar

Herman, J. (1996), ‘Les variétés du latin’, in Holtus, Metzeltin and Schmitt (1996), 44–61.

Herman, J. (2000), Vulgar Latin, translated by R. Wright (University Park, Penn.).Google Scholar

Herman, J. and Marinetti, A. (eds.) (2000), La preistoria dell'italiano: Atti della Tavola rotonda di linguistica storica, Università Ca’ Foscari di Venezia 11–13 giugno 1998 (Tübingen).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herman, J. and Rosén, H. (eds.) (2003), Petroniana: Gedenkschrift für Hubert Petersmann (Heidelberg).Google Scholar

Hernández Pérez, R. (2001), Poesía latina sepulcral de la Hispania Romana: estudio de los tópicos y sus formulaciones (Valencia).Google Scholar

Herren, M. W. (1982), ‘Sprachliche Eigentümlichkeiten in den hibernolateinischen Texten des 7. und 8. Jahrhunderts’, in Löwe, H. (ed.), Die Iren und Europa im früheren Mittelalter (Stuttgart), 425–33.Google Scholar

Herren, M. W. (1984), ‘Old Irish lexical and semantic influence on Hiberno-Latin’, in Ní Chatháin, P. and Richter, M. (eds.), Irland und Europa: Die Kirche im Frühmittelalter (Stuttgart), 197–209.Google Scholar

Herren, M. W. (1996), Latin Letters in Early Christian Ireland (Aldershot).

Hickey, R. (2003), ‘How do dialects get the features they have? On the process of new dialect formation’, in Hickey, R. (ed.), Motives for Language Change (Cambridge), 213–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hilgers, W. (1969), Lateinische Gefäβnamen: Bezeichnungen, Funktion und Form römischer Gefäβe nach den antiken Schriftquellen (Düsseldorf).Google Scholar

Hinskens, F., Auer, P. and Kerswill, P. (2005), ‘The study of dialect convergence and divergence: conceptual and methodological considerations’, in Auer, Hinskens and Kerswill (2005), 1–48.

Hofmann, J. B. and Szantyr, A. (1965), Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik (Munich).Google Scholar

Hofmann, K. and Auracher, T. M. (1883), ‘Der Longobardische Dioskorides des Marcellus Virgilius’, Romanische Forschungen 1, 49–105.Google Scholar

Holford-Strevens, L. (2003), Aulus Gellius: An Antonine Scholar and His Achievement, 2nd edn (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holtus, G., Metzeltin, M. and Schmitt, C. (eds.) (1996), Lexikon der Romanistischen Linguistik (LRL) Ⅱ.1. Latein und Romanisch: Historisch-vergleichende Grammatik der romanischen Sprachen (Tübingen).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holtz, L. (1981), Donat et la tradition de l'enseignement grammatical (Paris).Google Scholar

Hoogterp, P.-W. (1934), ‘Les vies des pères du Jura: étude sur la langue’, ALMA 9, 1–124.Google Scholar

Hornsby, D. (2006), Redefining Regional French: Koinéization and Dialect Levelling in Northern France (London).Google Scholar

Horrocks, G. C. (1997), Greek: A History of the Language and Its Speakers (London and New York).Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. (1997), ‘The unity of Roman Italy: some anomalies’, Scripta classica Israelica 16, 71–6.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. (2000), Virgil, Aeneid 7: A Commentary (Mnemosyne Supplement 198). (Leiden, Boston and Cologne).Google Scholar

Howald, E. and Sigerist, H. E. (eds.) (1927), Antonii Musae De herba uettonica liber. Pseudoapulei Herbarius etc. (Corpus medicorum Latinorum Ⅳ) (Leipzig and Berlin).Google Scholar

Howell, R. B. (2006), ‘Immigration and koineisation: the formation of early modern Dutch urban vernaculars’, TPhS 104, 207–27.Google Scholar

Hubschmid, J. (1953), Sardische Studien (Bern).Google Scholar

Humphrey, J. W., Oleson, J. P. and Sherwood, A. N. (1998), Greek and Roman Technology: A Sourcebook (London and New York).Google Scholar

Ilberg, I. (1927), Sorani Gynaeciorum libri Ⅳ. De signis fracturarum. De fasciis. Vita Hippocratis secundum Soranum (Leipzig and Berlin).Google Scholar

Jackson, K. H. (1953), Language and History in Early Britain (Edinburgh).Google Scholar

Jackson, K. H. (1967), A Historical Phonology of Breton (Dublin).Google Scholar

Jacquemard, C. (1995), ‘L'Emploi des prépositions apud et cum dans le Querolus est-il un régionalisme gaulois?’, in Callebat (1995), 77–91.

Janson, T. (1991), ‘Language change and metalinguistic change’, in Wright (1991), 19–28.

Jasny, N. (1944), The Wheats of Classical Antiquity (Baltimore).Google Scholar

Jeanneret, M. (1918), La langue des tablettes d'exécration latines (Paris and Neuchâtel).Google Scholar

Jocelyn, H. D. (1967), The Tragedies of Ennius (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Joly, R. and Byl, S. (1984), Hippocratis De diaeta (Corpus medicorum Graecorum Ⅰ.2.4) (Berlin).Google Scholar

Jones, M. (1988), ‘Sardinian’, in Harris and Vincent (1988), 314–50.

Joseph, B. D. and Wallace, R. E. (1991), ‘Is Faliscan a local Latin patois?’, Diachronica 8, 159–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Josephson, ἱ. (1950), Casae litterarum: Studien zum Corpus agrimensorum Romanorum (Uppsala).Google Scholar

Jungemann, F. H. (1955), La teoría del sustrato y los dialectos hispano-romances y gascones (Madrid).Google Scholar

Kahane, H. and Kahane, R. (1969–76), ‘Abendland und Byzanz: Literatur und Sprache’, in Reallexikon der ByzantinistikI.3.227–6.639 (Amsterdam).Google Scholar

Kaimio, J. (1969), ‘The nominative singular in -i of Latin gentilicia’, Arctos n.s. 6, 23–42.Google Scholar

Kaimio, J. (1972), The Ousting of Etruscan by Latin in Etruria (Rome).Google Scholar

Kajanto, I. (1963), A Study of the Greek Epitaphs of Rome (Helsinki).Google Scholar

Kajanto, I. (1965), The Latin Cognomina (Helsinki).Google Scholar

Karakasis, E. (2003), ‘Legal language in Plautus with special reference to Trinummus’, Mnemosyne 56, 194–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaster, R. A. (1988), Guardians of Language: The Grammarian and Society in Late Antiquity (Berkeley and Los Angeles).Google Scholar

Kaster, R. A. (1995), C. Suetonius Tranquillus De grammaticis et rhetoribus (Oxford).Google Scholar

Kaster, R. A. (2006), Marcus Tullius Cicero: Speech on behalf of Publius Sestius (Oxford).Google Scholar

Kästner, H. F. (1896), ‘Pseudo-Dioscoridis De herbis femininis’, Hermes 31 (1896), 578–636.Google Scholar

Kay, N. M. (2006), Epigrams from the Anthologia Latina: Text, Translation and Commentary (London).Google Scholar

Kelly, J. N. D. (1975), Jerome: His Life, Writings, and Controversies (London).Google Scholar

Kent, R. G. (1958), Varro on the Latin Language, 3rd edn, 2 vols. (Cambridge, Mass.).Google Scholar

Kerlouégan, F. (1968), ‘Le latin du De excidio Britanniae de Gildas’, in Barley and Hanson (1968), 151–76.

Kerr, R. M. (2005), ‘North African centenaria and Hebrew םיבִיצִגְ: some remarks relating to the Latino-Punic inscription from Gasr el-Azaiz (J. M. Reynolds and J. B. Ward Perkins (eds.), The Inscriptions of Roman Tripolitania (Rome and London, 1952). 893)’, Orientalia et Classica 8 (2005), 475–511.Google Scholar

Kerswill, P. and Trudgill, P. (2005), ‘The birth of new dialects’, in Auer, Hinskens and Kerswill (2005), 196–220.

Kiss, S. (1971), Les transformations de la structure syllabique en latin tardif (Debrecen).Google Scholar

Kiss, S., Mondin, L. and Salvi, G. (eds.) (2005), Latin et langues romanes: études de linguistique offertes à József Herman à l'occasion de son 80ème anniversaire (Tübingen).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, H.-W. (1968), Die Reichenauer Glossen Ⅰ (Munich).Google Scholar

Klein, K. K. (1953), ‘Die germanischen Wörter bei Anthimus’, in Knobloch, J. (ed.), Ammann-Festgabe Ⅰ (Innsbruck), 124–6.Google Scholar

Koch, J. T. (1983), ‘The loss of final syllables and loss of declension in Brittonic’, Bulletin of the Board of Celtic Studies 30, 201–33.Google Scholar

Koehler, A. (1878), ‘De auctorum belli Africani et belli Hispaniensis Latinitate’, Acta Seminarii Philologici Erlangensis (Erlangen), 367–476.Google Scholar

Kohlstedt, H. (1917), Das Romanische in den Artes des Consentius (Erlangen).Google Scholar

Kramer, J. (1976), Literarische Quellen zur Aussprache des Vulgärlateins (Meisenheim am Glan).Google Scholar

Kramer, J. (1978), ‘Vom Vulgärlatein zum Italischen: Bemerkungen zu einer Stele aus Rom’, ZPE 31, 291–4.Google Scholar

Kramer, J. (1980), ‘Ein weiterer inschriftlicher Beleg für ∗Lulius = Iulius: ΛΟΥΛΙΑΝΗ’, ZPE 39, 237–8.Google Scholar

Kramer, J. (1997), ‘Zwischen Latein und Moselromanisch: die Gondorfer Grabinschrift für Mauricius’, ZPE 118, 281–6.Google Scholar

Kramer, J. (1998), Die Sprachbezeichnungen Latinus und Romanus im Lateinischen und Romanischen (Berlin).Google Scholar

Kramer, J. (2001), Glossaria bilinguia altera (C. Gloss. Biling. Ⅱ) (Munich and Leipzig).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krebs, J. P. and Schmalz, J. H. (1905), Antibarbarus der lateinischen Sprache, 7th edn, 2 vols. (Berlin).Google Scholar

Krenkel, W. (1970), Lucilius Satiren, 2 vols. (Berlin).Google Scholar

Kristiansen, T. and J⊘rgensen, J. N. (2005), ‘Subjective factors in dialect convergence and divergence’, in Auer, Hinskens and Kerswill (2005), 287–302.

Kroll, W. (1897), ‘Das afrikanische Latein’, RhM 52, 569–90.Google Scholar

Kroll, W. (1913), M. Tullii Ciceronis Orator (Berlin).Google Scholar

Kroll, W. (1915), ‘Literaturbericht für das Jahr 1912: Sprachgeschichte’, Glotta 6, 362–76.Google Scholar

Kroll, W. (1929), C. Valerius Catullus, 2nd edn (Leipzig and Berlin).Google Scholar

Kruschwitz, P. (2002), Carmina saturnia epigraphica: Einleitung, Text und Kommentar zu den saturnischen Versinschriften (Stuttgart).Google Scholar

Kübler, B. (1893a), ‘Die lateinische Sprache auf afrikanischen Inschriften’, ALL 8, 161–202.Google Scholar

Kübler, B. (1893b), ‘Zur Sprache der Leges Burgundionum’, ALL 8, 445–51.Google Scholar

Lambert, P.-Y. (1995), La langue gauloise: description linguistique, commentaire d'inscriptions choisies (Paris).Google Scholar

Lambert, P.-Y. (ed.) (2002), Recueil des inscriptions gauloises (R.I.G.) II.2. Textes gallo-latins sur instrumentum (Paris).Google Scholar

Lancel, S. (1981), ‘La fin et la survie de la latinité en Afrique du Nord: état des questions’, REL 59, 269–97.Google Scholar

Lancel, S. (1985), ‘Y a-t-il une Africitas?’, REL 63, 161–82.Google Scholar

Landgraf, G. (1896), ‘Über die Latinität des Horazscholiasten Porphyrion’, ALL 9, 549–65.Google Scholar

Landgraf, G. (1914), Kommentar zu Ciceros Rede Pro Sex. Roscio Amerino, 2nd edn (Leipzig and Berlin).Google Scholar

Langslow, D. R. (2000), Medical Latin in the Roman Empire (Oxford).Google Scholar

Langslow, D. R. (2005a), ‘Linguistic “highs” and “lows” in late Latin medical texts: L. utique and the dangers of generalizing’, in Kiss, Mondin and Salvi (2005), 313–25.

Langslow, D. R. (2005b), ‘“Langues réduites au lexique”? The languages of Latin technical prose’, in Reinhardt, Lapidge and Adams (2005), 287–302.

Langslow, D. R. (2006), The Latin Alexander Trallianus: The Text and Transmission of a Late Latin Medical Book (JRS Monograph 10) (London).Google Scholar

Laoust, E. (1920), Mots et choses berbères: notes de linguistique et d'ethnographie. Dialectes du Maroc (Paris).Google Scholar

Lapesa, R. (1980), Historia de la lengua española, 8th edn (Madrid).Google Scholar

Lapidge, M. and Sharpe, R. (1985), A Bibliography of Celtic–Latin Literature 400–1200 (Dublin).Google Scholar

La, Regina A. (1976), ‘Rivista di epigrafia italica’, SE 44, 283–8.Google Scholar

Latham, R. E. (1965), Revised Medieval Latin Word-List from British and Irish Sources (London).Google Scholar

Latte, K. (1940), ‘Livy's Patavinitas’, CP 35, 56–60.Google Scholar

Lauffer, S. (1971), Diokletians Preisedikt (Berlin).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laughton, E. (1960), ‘Observations on the style of Varro’, CQ n.s. 10, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laughton, E. (1964), The Participle in Cicero (Oxford).Google Scholar

Lazzeroni, R. (1956), ‘La “geminatio vocalium” nelle iscrizioni latine’, ASNP 25, 124–35.Google Scholar

Lazzeroni, R. (1962), ‘Le più antiche attestazioni del nom. pl. -ās in latino e la provenienza dei Coloni pesaresi’, Studi e saggi linguistici 2, 106–22.Google Scholar

Lazzeroni, R. (1965), ‘Il dativo “sabellico” in -a: contributo alla conoscenza della latinizzazione dei Peligni’, Studi e saggi linguistici 5, 65–86.Google Scholar

Lazzeroni, R. (1974), ‘Contatti di lingue e di culture nell'Italia antica: il patronimico nella formula onomastica’, Studi e saggi linguistici 14, 275–306.Google Scholar

Leary, T. J. (1996), Martial Book ⅩⅣ: The Apophoreta (London).Google Scholar

Leeman, A. D., Pinkster, H. and Nelson, H. L. W. (1985), M. Tullius Cicero De oratore libri III II. Buch I, 166–265; Buch II, 1–98 (Heidelberg).

Leeman, A. D., Pinkster, H. and Rabbie, E. (1989), M. Tullius Cicero De oratore libri Ⅲ III. Buch Ⅱ, 99–290 (Heidelberg).Google Scholar

Leeman, A. D., Pinkster, H. and Wisse, J. (1996), M. Tullius Cicero De oratore libri Ⅲ Ⅳ. Buch Ⅱ, 291–367; Buch Ⅲ, 1–95 (Heidelberg).Google Scholar

Lejeune, M. (1970), ‘Phonologie osque et graphie grecque’, REA 72, 271–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lejeune, M. (1975), ‘Réflexions sur la phonologie du vocalisme osque’, BSL 70, 233–51.Google Scholar

Lejeune, M. and Marichal, R. (1976–7), ‘Textes gaulois et gallo-romains en cursive latine’, Études celtiques 15, 151–68.Google Scholar

Lennartz, K. (2003), ‘Zu Sprachniveau und Stilbildung in der republikanischen Tragödie’, Glotta 79, 83–136.Google Scholar

Leo, F. (1895–6), Plauti Comoediae, 2 vols. (Berlin).Google Scholar

Letta, C. (1972), Ⅰ Marsi e il Fucino nell'antichità (Milan).Google Scholar

Letta, C. (1976), ‘Dialetti italici minori: Marso’, SE 44, 275–81.Google Scholar

Letta, C. (1979), ‘Una nuova coppia di questori eponimi (qestur) da Supinum’, Athenaeum n.s. 57, 404–10.Google Scholar

Letta, C. and D'Amato, S. (1975), Epigrafia della regione dei Marsi (Milan).Google Scholar

Leumann, M. (1947), ‘Die lateinische Dichtersprache’, MH 4, 116–39 = Leumann (1959), 131–56.Google Scholar

Leumann, M. (1959), Kleine Schriften (Zürich and Stuttgart).Google Scholar

Leumann, M. (1960), ‘Zwei lateinische Wortbedeutungen: Lucina und bubo’, Die Sprache 6, 156–61.Google Scholar

Leumann, M. (1977), Lateinische Laut- und Formenlehre, 6th edn (Munich).Google Scholar

Levick, B. (1967), Roman Colonies in Southern Asia Minor (Oxford).Google Scholar

Della, Levi Vida G. and Amadasi, Guzzo M. G. (1987), Iscrizioni puniche della Tripolitania (1927–1967) (Rome).Google Scholar

Lewis, C. T. and Short, C. (1879), A Latin Dictionary (Oxford).Google Scholar

Lewis, H. (1943) Yr Elfen Ladin yn yr Iaith Gymraeg (Cardiff).Google Scholar

Liebermann, W.-L. (1997), ‘Consultus Fortunatianus’, in Der neue Pauly: Enzyklopädie der Antike (Stuttgart and Weimar) III, 151.Google Scholar

Liechtenhan, E. (1963), Anthimi De obseruatione ciborum ad Theodericum regem Francorum epistula (Berlin).Google Scholar

Linderbauer, B. (1922), S. Benedicti Regula monachorum (Metten).Google Scholar

Lindsay, W. M. (1894), The Latin Language: An Historical Account of Latin Sounds, Stems, and Flexions (Oxford).Google Scholar

Lindsay, W. M. (1900), The Captivi of Plautus (London).Google Scholar

Lintott, A. W. (1992), Judicial Reform and Land Reform in the Roman Republic (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Lipsius, R. A. (1891), Acta apostolorum apocrypha Ⅰ (Leipzig).Google Scholar

Lloyd, P. M. (1987), From Latin to Spanish Ⅰ. Historical Phonology and Morphology of the Spanish Language (American Philosophical Society Memoirs 173).

Lodge, R. A. (1993), French: From Dialect to Standard (London and New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Löfstedt, B. (1961), Studien über die Sprache der langobardischen Gesetze: Beiträge zur frühmittelalterlichen Latinität (Stockholm).Google Scholar

Löfstedt, B. (1963), ‘Bemerkungen zum Problem Genus: Sexus im Lateinischen’, Symb. Osl. 38, 47–68 = B. Löfstedt (2000), 24–46.

Löfstedt, B. (1965), Der hibernolateinische Grammatiker Malsachanus (Uppsala).Google Scholar

Löfstedt, B. (1973), ‘Le problème de l'unité du latin vulgaire’, in Actes du 5ème Congrès des romanistes scandinaves (Turku), 107–11 = B. Löfstedt (2000), 101–05.Google Scholar

Löfstedt, B. (1976), ‘Zum spanischen Mittellatein’, Glotta 54, 117–57 = B. Löfstedt (2000), 169–211.Google Scholar

Löfstedt, B. (1979), ‘Zu Arbeos Latein’, ALMA 41, 51–73 = B. Löfstedt (2000), 238–60.

Löfstedt, B. (2000), Ausgewählte Aufsätze zur lateinischen Sprachgeschichte und Philologie, edited by Berschin, W. (Stuttgart).Google Scholar

Löfstedt, E. (1911), Philologischer Kommentar zur Peregrinatio Aetheriae: Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der lateinischen Sprache (Uppsala).Google Scholar

Löfstedt, E. (1936), Vermischte Studien zur lateinischen Sprachkunde und Syntax (Lund).Google Scholar

Löfstedt, E. (1950), Coniectanea: Untersuchungen auf dem Gebiete der antiken und mittelalterlichen Latinität (Uppsala and Stockholm).Google Scholar

Löfstedt, E. (1956), Syntactica: Studien und Beiträge zur historischen Syntax des Lateins Ⅰ, 2nd edn, Ⅱ (Lund).Google Scholar

Löfstedt, E. (1959), Late Latin (Oslo).Google Scholar

Loth, J. (1892), Les mots latins dans les langues brittoniques (gallois, armoricain, cornique): phonétique et commentaire (Paris).Google Scholar

Lundström, S. (1943), Studien zur lateinischen Irenäusübersetzung (Lund).

Lunelli, A. (ed.) (1980), La lingua poetica latina, 2nd edn (Bologna).Google Scholar

Macalister, R. A. S. (1945–9), Corpus inscriptionum insularum Celticarum, 2 vols. (Dublin).Google Scholar

MacCary, W. T. and Willcock, M. M. (1976), Plautus Casina (Cambridge).Google Scholar

McCone, K. (1982), ‘Brigit in the seventh century: a saint with three lives?’, Peritia 1 (1982), 107–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGlynn, P. (1963–7), Lexicon Terentianum, 2 vols. (London and Glasgow).Google Scholar

MacKinney, L. C. (1937), Early Medieval Medicine with Special Reference to France and Chartres (Baltimore).Google Scholar

Machado, J. P. (1967), Dicionário etimológico da língua portuguesa, 2nd edn, 3 vols. (Lisbon).Google Scholar

Maiden, M. (1995), A Linguistic History of Italian (London and New York).Google Scholar

Maire, B. (2002), Gargilius Martialis: les remèdes tirés des légumes et des fruits (Paris).Google Scholar

Malagòli, G. (1939), Vocabolario pisano (Florence).Google Scholar

Mallinson, G. (1988), ‘Rumanian’, in Harris and Vincent (1988), 391–419.

Maltby, R. (2002), ‘Hispanisms in the language of Isidore of Seville’, in Urso, G. (ed.), Hispania terris omnibus felicior. Premesse ed esiti di un processo di integrazione: Atti del convegno internazionale, Cividale del Friuli, 27–29 settembre 2001 (Pisa), 345–55.Google Scholar

Maltby, R. (2003), ‘Evidence for late and colloquial Latin in the commentaries of Porphyrio, Donatus and Servius’, in Solin, Leiwo and Halla-aho (2003), 265–76.

Mancini, M. (1997), ‘Tracce di interferenza fra etrusco e latino a Preneste’, SE 63, 315–45.Google Scholar

Mancini, M. (2002), ‘Tra linguistica ed ermeneutica: nuove acquisizioni falische’, Incontri linguistici 25, 23–46.Google Scholar

Mann, J. C. (1971), ‘Spoken Latin in Britain as evidenced in the inscriptions’, Britannia 2, 218–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marchetti, P. (2001), L'usu córsu: dizionario dei vocaboli d'uso e dei modi di dire di Corsica settentrionale e centrale con i corrispondenti delle lingue italiana e francese (Ajaccio).Google Scholar

Marichal, R. (1988), Les graffites de La Graufesenque (Paris).Google Scholar

Marichal, R. (1992), Les ostraca de Bu Njem (Assraya al Hamra, Tripoli).Google Scholar

Mariner, Bigorra S. (1952), Inscripciones hispanas en verso (Barcelona and Madrid).Google Scholar

Mariner, Bigorra S. (1960), ‘El latín de la Península Ibérica, 2. Léxico’, in Alvar, M. et al. (eds.), Enciclopedia lingüística hispánica Ⅰ (Madrid), 199–236.Google Scholar

Mariner, Bigorra S. (1983), ‘Hispanische Latinität und sprachliche Kontakte im römischen Hispanien’, ANRW II.29.2, 819–52.Google Scholar

Marinetti, M. (2000), ‘La romanizzazione linguistica della Penisola’, in Herman and Marinetti (2000), 61–79.CrossRef

Markovich, M. and Georgiadou, A. (1988), ‘Eucheria's adynata’, ICS 13, 165–74.Google Scholar

Marmorale, E. V. (1950), Naevius poeta (Florence).Google Scholar

Marouzeau, J. (1949), Quelques aspects de la formation du latin littéraire (Paris).Google Scholar

Marx, F. (1894), Incerti auctoris De ratione dicendi ad C. Herennium libri Ⅳ (Leipzig).Google Scholar

Marx, F. (1904–5), C. Lucilii Carminum reliquiae, 2 vols. (Leipzig).Google Scholar

Matthews, J. F. (1971), ‘Gallic supporters of Theodosius’, Latomus 30, 1073–99.Google Scholar

Mattingly, D. J. (1992), ‘Appendix 1: the cemetery adjacent to the entrance to the sports ground (Site 8)’, in Ben, N. Lazreg and Mattingly, D. J. (eds.), Leptiminus (Lamta): A Roman port city in Tunisia Report no. 1 (JRA Supplementary Series 4) (Ann Arbor), 253–9.Google Scholar

Mattingly, D. J. (2002), ‘Vulgar and weak “Romanization”, or time for a paradigm shift?’, review of Keay, S. and Terrenato, N. (eds.), Italy and the West: Comparative Issues in Romanization (Oxford, 2001), JRA 15, 536–40.Google Scholar

Mattingly, D. J. and Hitchner, R. B. (1995), ‘Roman Africa: an archaeological review’, JRS 85, 165–213.Google Scholar

Mayer, M. (1994), ‘El latín de Hispania’, in Actas del Ⅷ Congreso español de estudios clásicos Ⅰ (Madrid), 363–82.Google Scholar

Mayer, R. G. (2005), ‘The impracticability of Latin “Kunstprosa”’, in Reinhardt, Lapidge and Adams (2005), 195–210.CrossRef

Mazzarino, A. (1982), M. Porci Catonis De agri cultura, 2nd edn (Leipzig).Google Scholar

Mazzini, I. (1981), ‘Il latino medico in Italia nei secoli Ⅴ e Ⅵ’, in La cultura in Italia fra tardo antico e alto medioevo: Atti del Convegno tenuto a Roma, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, dal 12 al 16 novembre 1979 (Rome), 433–41.Google Scholar

Mazzini, I. (1984), De observantia ciborum: traduzione tardo-antica del Περὶ διαίτης pseudoippocratico l. Ⅱ (Rome).Google Scholar

Mazzini, I. (1988), Q. Gargili Martialis De hortis, 2nd edn (Bologna).Google Scholar